Skip to main content
Paediatrics & Child Health logoLink to Paediatrics & Child Health
letter
. 2018 Jul 9;23(6):428. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy092

Neonatal abstinence syndrome – a better way

Paul Thiessen 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6234432  PMID: 30455578

The excellent practice point published in the June 2018 issue of Paediatrics & Child Health strongly advocates that rooming in with mother should become the normative way to manage infants at risk of neonatal abstinence syndrome. This stands in sharp contrast to the ‘usual’ pattern of practice where infants exhibiting signs of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) are transferred to an neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or ‘observational nursery’, as occurs in approximately 90% of Canadian hospitals as revealed by a national survey of practice published in 2017 (1). In Vancouver, we have been employing a ‘rooming in’ model of care at BC Women’s Hospital since 2001, when we dedicated an entire postpartum ward for the care of mothers and infants with opiate exposure at risk of NAS. NICU or intermediate nursery admission only happens if there are medical problems requiring other interventions such as respiratory support, NG feeding or IV antibiotics. We have demonstrated convincingly that this model significantly reduces the proportion of infants needing treatment with morphine, reduces the number of days they need treatment AND significantly increases the odds of breastfeeding and discharge in the custody of their mother (2,3). Our rooming in model of care has never employed the Finnegan numerical scoring system in the original or modified form, as we were very concerned that it would lead to over treatment. We opted instead for a variation of the ‘Eat/Sleep/Console’ model of observation espoused by Grossman et al. in their recently published article (4), which convincingly shows that use of the Finnegan scoring system leads to over treatment.

The ideal model of care for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome is still evolving, but on balance of best evidence we should 1) bypass NICU and have the baby ‘room in’ with mother as the default strategy and 2) avoid the use of the Finnegan scoring system. Based on our 17 year experience with approximately 1,500 infants here in Vancouver, everyone will be happier!

References

  • 1. Murphy K, Coo H, Warre R, Shah V, Dow K. Variations and similarities in clinical management of neonatal abstinence syndrome: Findings of a Canadian survey. Paediatr Child Health 2017;22:148–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Abrahams RR, Kelly SA, Payne S, Thiessen PN, Mackintosh J, Janssen PA. Rooming- in compared to standard care of newborns of mothers using methadone or heroin. Can Fam Physician 2007;53:1723–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Abrahams RR, Mackay-Dunn MH, Nevmerjitskaia V, MacRae GS, Payne S, Hodgson ZG. An evaluation of rooming-in among substance-exposed newborns in British Columbia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34:475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Grossman MR, Lipshaw MJ, Osborn RR, Berkwitt AK. A novel approach to assessing infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Hospital Pediatrics 2018;8:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Paediatrics & Child Health are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES