Abstract
Glucocorticoid, a major risk factor of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), is widely known to promote microtubule dysfunction recognized as the early pathological feature that culminates in memory deficits. However, the exact glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated mechanism of how glucocorticoid triggers microtubule destabilization and following intracellular transport deficits remains elusive. Therefore, we investigated the effect of glucocorticoid on microtubule instability and cognitive impairment using male ICR mice and human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. The mice group that was exposed to corticosteroid, the major glucocorticoid form of rodents, showed reduced trafficking of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) 1/2 and mitochondria, which are necessary for memory establishment, into the synapse due to microtubule destabilization. In SH-SY5Y cells, cortisol, the major glucocorticoid form of humans, also decreased microtubule stability represented by reduced acetylated α-tubulin to tyrosinated α-tubulin ratio (A/T ratio), depending on the mitochondria GR-mediated pathway. Cortisol translocated the Hsp70-bound GR into mitochondria which thereafter promoted GR-Bcl-2 interaction. Increased ER-mitochondria connectivity via GR-Bcl-2 coupling led to mitochondrial Ca2+ influx, which triggered mTOR activation. Subsequent autophagy inhibition by mTOR phosphorylation increased SCG10 protein levels via reducing ubiquitination of SCG10, eventually inducing microtubule destabilization. Thus, failure of trafficking AMPAR1/2 and mitochondria into the cell terminus occurred by kinesin-1 detachment from microtubules, which is responsible for transporting organelles towards periphery. However, the mice exposed to pretreatment of microtubule stabilizer paclitaxel showed the restored translocation of AMPAR1/2 or mitochondria into synapses and improved memory function compared to corticosterone-treated mice. In conclusion, glucocorticoid enhances ER-mitochondria coupling which evokes elevated SCG10 and microtubule destabilization dependent on mitochondrial GR. This eventually leads to memory impairment through failure of AMPAR1/2 or mitochondria transport into cell periphery.
Introduction
Microtubule takes a pivotal role acting as major highway for intracellular trafficking of necessary components such as proteins or organelles. Notably, maintaining homeostasis in microtubule networks in neuronal cells is particularly important for strengthening synaptic connection and regulating axonal transport. Therefore, it is not surprising that microtubule dysfunction and following synaptic transport deficits are commonly observed in neurodegenerative diseases. For instances, reduced microtubule numbers and altered post-translational modification (PTM) of α-tubulins are observed in AD1. Microtubule networks are important for consolidating memory via promoting AMPAR translocation into synapse. Previous research already demonstrated that stable microtubule structures promoted AMPAR endocytosis via MAP1B synthesis or the kinesin-1-mediated AMPAR transport, which enhance cognitive function2,3. Stable acetylated α-tubulin is also responsible for transporting mitochondria into neuronal cell periphery to provide energy for synaptic homeostasis and memory formation4. Thus, microtubule dysfunction precedes memory impairment since neuronal cells failed to import AMPAR and mitochondria into synapses, both of which are necessary to trigger long term potentiation and eventual memory formation. However, even though microtubule dysfunction represents a downstream of neurodegenerative cascades, the mechanism concerning pathogenesis of microtubule destabilization and memory impairment needs further investigation for discovering potential therapeutics of AD.
Stress, a major etiology of AD, is generally believed to induce alterations in microtubule networks through the glucocorticoid signaling pathway. Numerous reports have previously focused on the effect of glucocorticoid on hyperphosphorylation of tau as a key regulator of microtubule destabilization in AD5. Recently, however, many changes in microtubule networks have been observed like change in the ratio of acetylated/tyrosinated α-tubulins rather than tau pathology in AD. Namely, it is important to define the detailed mechanisms of glucocorticoid on microtubule dysfunction rather than neurofibrillary tangle formations to find the new neurodegenerative cascades of AD. Glucocorticoid mediates microtubule destabilization via various signaling methods. Growing evidence demonstrates that excessive glucocorticoid inhibited microtubule assembly through activating genomic pathway in rat C6 glioma cells6 or hyper-stabilizing the tubulin through nongenomic mechanism7. However, understanding of how glucocorticoid enhances microtubule dysfunction in neuronal cells and subsequent memory deficits remains unclear. Among the various effects, mitochondrial GR is of interest in the AD pathogenesis since it plays a crucial role in Ca2+ homeostasis in mitochondria through interacting with Bcl-2. Aberrant changes of Ca2+ in mitochondria can damage the microtubule dynamics through elevating cytoskeletal protein calpains and forming tangles, eventually leading to memory deficits8. Thus, identifying how glucocorticoid promotes microtubule dysfunction and memory impairment via changing Ca2+ homeostasis is important for understanding molecular links between stress and AD.
In the present study, we used male ICR mice exposed to glucocorticoid to assess how glucocorticoid can affect memory formation. Mice with short-term glucocorticoid treatment during several hours were used to confirm the newly revealed mechanism of mitochondrial Ca2+ influx. The mechanisms of microtubule destabilization and following memory deficits were observed in mice underwent relatively longer term of glucocorticoid treatment for 2–3 days. In addition, human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, widely used as neurodegenerative disease model, were utilized to investigate the detailed mechanism of microtubule dysfunction via GR-mediated changes in mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis. Overall, we determined detrimental effects of glucocorticoid on microtubule networks followed by memory impairment and the underlying mechanisms using both in vivo and in vitro models.
Results
The effect of corticosterone on memory impairment in vivo
We first examined microtubule dynamics in hippocampus of male ICR mice treated with corticosterone, the major glucocorticoid form in rodents. Microtubule dynamics can be controlled by the intrinsic GTPase activity of tubulins and various PTMs that occur on C-terminal tails, interacting with motor proteins and microtubule-associated proteins. Acetylated or detyrosinated α-tubulin is the marker of stable tubulin which reduces microtubule depolymerization. In contrast, tyrosinated α-tubulin is the labile tubulin and susceptible to microtubule destabilizing molecules. Thus, A/T ratio has been used to evaluate microtubule stability9. Both immunoblotting and immunofluorescent results revealed that corticosterone reduced A/T ratio in hippocampus (Figs. 1a, b). Microtubule destabilization usually exerts decreased transport of necessary components into cell periphery. Thus, a failure to traffick AMPAR1/2, the major subunits for regulating the memory function in hippocampus, into synapse was shown while there were no detectable changes in AMPAR1/2 expressions in mice group with corticosterone (Fig. 1c). In addition, the perinuclear clumping of mitochondria was observed in mice with corticosterone (Fig. 1d), which is the representative phenomenon for microtubule dysfunction. Since mitochondrial trafficking to cell terminus was impaired, cell death would likely follow. We identified that the cell apoptosis was increased with corticosterone treatment using the TUNEL assay (Fig. 1e). With decreased AMPAR and mitochondria transport, the spontaneous alteration percentage for evaluating cognitive function was decreased in corticosterone-treated mice (Fig. 1f). Thus, the results suggest that corticosterone triggered reduced A/T ratio and transport deficits, followed by memory deficits.
Translocation of GR into mitochondria induced ER-mitochondria tethering
We evaluated the effect of cortisol, the major form of glucocorticoid in humans, on microtubule destabilization in SH-SY5Y cell lines based on in vivo experiments. We showed that cortisol decreased the A/T ratio of cells in a concentration and time dependent manner (Figs. 2a, b). Reduced A/T ratio was also detected in the immunostaining results upon cortisol (Fig. 2c). Cortisol can trigger various signaling including genomic, nongenomic, and mitochondria GR-mediated pathway. To differentiate which signaling induces the change in microtubule dynamics, actinomycin D (nuclear transcription inhibitor) that blocks the genomic pathway of cortisol and the cortisol-BSA, which specifically induces the membrane GR-mediated pathway, were treated. We found that A/T ratio was not recovered in cortisol-treated cells with actinomycin D and no detectable change in the A/T ratio was observed in cortisol-BSA-treated cells (Figs. S1A–S1B). In contrast, mitochondrial GR played an important role in regulation of microtubule dynamics. Co-localization of GR and COX IV, the mitochondrial marker, increased upon cortisol for 2 h (Fig. 2d). Subcellular fraction results also indicated that cortisol induced GR translocation into mitochondria, which was inhibited by RU 486 (competitive inhibitor of GR, Fig. S1C). The inactive form of GR binds to many chaperone proteins. In contrast, the active form of GR detaches from heat shock protein90 (Hsp90) with ligand and is subsequently translocated into nucleus or mitochondria. Some GRs do not detach from Hsp70 or selectively associate with un-bound cytosolic Hsp70; all of which guide the GR to translocate into mitochondria10. Consistent with previous research, cortisol promoted GR-Hsp70 coupling while GR-Hsp90 interaction was reduced (Fig. 2e). The immunoprecipitation result of mitochondrial parts also revealed that GR-Hsp70 binding was elevated when exposed to cortisol while there was no GR-Hsp90 complex detected (Fig. 2f). The tendency of increased GR translocation into mitochondria was inhibited with VER 155008 (Hsp70 inhibitor) pretreatment (Fig. 2g). We also found that the reduced A/T ratio was recovered with VER 155008 pretreatment (Fig. S1D), suggesting that mitochondrial GR signaling among the various pathways of glucocorticoid is likely to alter microtubule dynamics.
GR increases mitochondrial calcium by binding to Bcl-2, but underlying mechanism is not understood. One of major factors in facilitating the uptake of Ca2+ by mitochondria is the contact between ER and mitochondria where inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor (IP3R) and voltage-dependent anion-selective channel 1 (VDAC1) bridge. Thus, we examined the effect of cortisol on ER-mitochondria coupling via GR binding to Bcl-2. We found the interaction between mitochondrial protein TOMM20 and mitochondria-associated membrane of ER (MAM) protein IP3R was increased with cortisol treatment, while the Bcl-2 was also translocated into mitochondria (Fig. 3a). We also showed that the binding between GR to Bcl-2, IP3R, and TOMM20 was increased with cortisol (Fig. 3b), suggesting that GR-Bcl-2 complex may increase ER-mitochondria contacts. As predicted, co-localization between IP3R and VDAC1 was strongly stimulated with cortisol treatment, but reduced by RU 486 (Fig. 3c). Proximal ligation assay (PLA) results also showed that cortisol triggered IP3R-VDAC1 interactions, which were decreased with the knockdown of bcl-2 (Fig. 3d). We then assessed protein from which each organelle ligates to form ER-mitochondria coupling. Cortisol triggered the binding between mfn2 and phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 2 (PACS2), reversed by knockdown of bcl-2 (Fig. 3e). Meanwhile, this had no effect on vesicle-associated protein B (VAPB)-protein tyrosine phosphatase interacting protein 51 (PTPIP51) complex (Fig. S2A). Similar to in vitro results, corticosterone increased IP3R-VDAC1 interaction binding to GR and Bcl-2 in hippocampus of mice (Fig. 3f). Furthermore, we also found that ER-mitochondria contact was increased with corticosterone treatment in PLA results (Fig. 3g) via mfn2-PACS2 binding (Figs. 3h, i). Inhibiting ER-mitochondria tethering by knockdown of bcl-2 or pretreatment of RU 486 also reduced A/T ratio, which indicates that this connectivity decreases microtubule stability (Figs. S2B – 2C).
Involvement of ER-mitochondria connectivity in reduced ubiquitination of SCG10
ER-mitochondria contact by cortisol increased rhod-2 intensity which binds to mitochondrial Ca2+ (Fig. 4a). This indicates that Ca2+ was transferred through the IP3R-VDAC1 bridge, which mainly functions as a Ca2+ pathway from ER to mitochondria11. Induction of mitochondrial Ca2+ was decreased by the knockdown of bcl-2 and pretreatment of xestospongin C (the potent membrane permeable IP3R antagonist) or VDAC1 inhibitor ruthenium red (Figs. S3A – 3C). Consistent Ca2+ transfer from ER to mitochondria is basically required to maintain ample NADH production12. We showed ATP production was increased approximately 20% with cortisol but reduced with RU 486 pretreatment (Fig. 4b). Increased ATP level generally leads to the deactivation of AMPK, which modulates the mTOR pathway. We showed that cortisol decreased AMPK activity, while stimulating mTOR phosphorylation (Fig. 4c). mTOR phosphorylation was remarkably reduced to the control level with xestospongin C or ruthenium red pretreatment, indicating that mitochondria calcium influx induced mTOR activation (Fig. 4d). mTOR inhibits autophagy function by directly phosphorylating or inhibiting ULK, AMBRA1, or Atg1413. Our results also showed that cortisol inhibited autophagy function represented by Atg5 reduction, increased p62 level, and decreased LC3B formation all of which were reversed by rapamycin (Fig. 4e). Autophagy is closely related to regulating protein level especially microtubule-associated proteins as cytoskeleton assembly plays a critical role in cell growth. Unlike mRNA expression of microtubule-associated proteins that remain unchanged (Fig. S3D), the expression of SCG10 was increased with cortisol (Fig. 4f) but decreased with rapamycin pretreatment (Fig. 4g), where cortisol had no effect on stathmin-1 expression. We therefore speculated that selective ubiquitination of SCG10 generally occurred, which was inhibited with cortisol. We showed ubiquitination of SCG10 was reduced with cortisol, but increased to the control level upon rapamycin pretreatment (Fig. 4h). Co-localization of LC3 and SCG10 was also promoted to the control level with pretreatment of rapamycin (Fig. 4i). We confirmed that increase in SCG10 level was dependent on the ubiquitination-proteasome system as proteasome inhibitor MG 132 decreased the SCG10 level whereas protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide had no effect on SCG10 expression (Fig. S3E). These results indicated that cortisol increased mitochondrial calcium influx which resulted in mTOR-dependent inhibition of autophagy and following SCG10 level increase.
Glucocorticoid triggered microtubule dysfunction and kinesin-1 detachment leading to memory deficits through reducing trafficking of AMPAR and mitochondria into cell periphery
Microtubule destabilization occurs when binding with SCG10 through activating/deactivating enzymes that regulate the PTM of α-tubulin. Increased SCG10-tubulin binding by cortisol was observed due to upregulation of SCG10 level (Fig. 5a). Thus, decreased A/T ratio of α-tubulins in cells upon cortisol was restored with pretreatment of rapamycin (Fig. 5b). Microtubule destabilization has been generally known to reduce the binding of kinesin-1, the motor protein that transports protein from cytosol close to the nucleus towards cell terminus. We showed decreased binding of kinesin-1 to α-tubulin with cortisol (Figs. 5c, d). Our animal studies also showed that corticosterone decreased A/T ratio in the hippocampus. On the other hand, rapamycin pretreatment not only restored A/T ratio (Fig. 5e), but also kinesin-1 binding to α-tubulin (Fig. 5f). As microtubule transports the important molecules into the necessary parts, we found that AMPAR1/2 did not closely interact with α-tubulin upon cortisol treatment (Figs. 5g, h). Mitochondria transport towards the cell terminus was also decreased by cortisol (Fig. 5i). Subsequently, cortisol reduced the cell viability, which was reversed by paclitaxel (Fig. 5j).
We investigated whether microtubule stabilization reversed corticosterone effect that induced memory impairment and cell death in vivo. Corticosterone decreased translocation of AMPAR1/2 and TOMM20 into the synapse, which was recovered by paclitaxel injections (Fig. 6a). Similarly, corticosterone reduced co-localization between synaptic marker (post synaptic density 95-PSD95) and TOMM20 or AMPAR1/2 in hippocampal tissue, which was recovered with paclitaxel treatment (Figs. 6b–d). The TUNEL assay results showed that neuronal apoptosis was increased with corticosterone, which was reduced by paclitaxel treatment (Fig. 6e). In Y-maze test, mice with corticosterone showed memory impairment whereas the mice with paclitaxel pretreatment showed recovered cognition (Fig. 6f). Overall, our data supported that microtubule dysfunction led to failure of AMPAR or mitochondria trafficking into cell terminus, which promoted memory impairment and cell death.
Discussion
Our study not only showed glucocorticoid changes microtubule dynamics through increasing ER-mitochondria coupling followed by reduction of SCG10 ubiquitination, but also demonstrated how microtubule dysfunction affects memory formation in both the animal model and SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 7). We first demonstrated that microtubule destabilization in the hippocampus by corticosterone treatment eventually induced memory deficits. There are considerable research investigating how glucocorticoid induces microtubule dysfunction via amyloidosis and tau hyperphosphorylation by genomic pathway5 or membrane GR-dependent CREB pathway14, but the detailed mechanism elucidating the effect of glucocorticoid on microtubule has not been studied. Current research demonstrated, for the first time, that the effects of mitochondrial GR on the microtubule dysfunction and memory deficits. Our work identified Hsp70 played an important role in GR trafficking into mitochondria since Hsp70 is known to be mitochondrial chaperones importing various proteins into the mitochondria15. There are many debates that consider whether or not cortisol induced the translocation of GR into mitochondria. Chronic cortisol treatment triggered the reductions in GR trafficking into mitochondria due to the changes in GR expressions or PTM16. In contrast, cortisol usually stimulated GR movement into mitochondria with short term treatment representing an acute stress state, which is the same as our condition. Mitochondrial GR can directly affect the mitochondrial function including transcription of OXPHOS genes, ATP synthesis, and Ca2+ reuptake17–19. These changes in mitochondrial function alter microtubule dynamics since assembly or PTM of tubulin is mediated by mitochondrial Ca2+, which in turn affects ATP synthesis16,20. In particular, GR designated toward mitochondria has been widely accepted for binding to Bcl-2 to exert mitochondrial function change, but the detailed mechanism has not been implicated21. In this paper, we demonstrate how the GR-Bcl-2 complex increased the ER-mitochondria connectivity. Normally, about twenty percent of mitochondria are closely related to MAM. However, increased ER-mitochondria communication has been extensively observed in AD models, indicating that AD is deeply associated with the MAM function22. Interestingly, our works showed that ER-mitochondria contacts formed by GR-Bcl-2 complex triggered IP3R-VDAC1 bridging where both GR and Bcl-2 attach. Bcl-2 is previously described to bind to IP3R and mediate Ca2+ transfer from ER into mitochondria11,23,24. Surprisingly, we also observed GR interacted with IP3R, which was not observed in previous research. Indeed, we could assume that GR-Bcl-2 complex binds to the MAM region serving as scaffold to help ER-mitochondria coupling, although the exact mechanism needs further investigation. Several tethering proteins function to increase interaction between MAM and mitochondria such as PACS2-mfn2 and VAPB-PTPIP5125. In our work, cortisol formed mfn2-PACS2 interaction, one of the major tethering protein complexes stabilizing the ER-mitochondria network, which was decreased with knockdown of bcl-211. We also confirmed that inhibiting ER-mitochondria coupling restored A/T ratio, suggesting that GR translocation into mitochondria is highly associated with microtubule destabilization through integration of ER and mitochondria.
Recent studies have concentrated on elucidating new therapeutic approach to AD through an in-depth inspection on the downstream effect of ER-mitochondria interaction since it precedes the accumulation of plaques or tangles22,26. We showed that IP3R-VDAC1 bridging increased mitochondrial Ca2+ which finally culminated in autophagy dysfunction12,23,27. Ca2+ overload in mitochondria conversely leads to increased ATP synthesis via stimulating OXPHOS enzymes28. Although some previous reports suggested that chronic glucocorticoid treatment reduced ATP synthesis due to prolonged mitochondria damage and different tendency of regulating OXPHOS genes, many studies showed glucocorticoid promotes ATP synthesis by increasing mitochondrial calcium storing capacity or GR binding to the promoters of OXPHOS genes in mitochondrial DNA17,18. With increased ATP level, the deactivation of AMPK either phosphorylates TSC2 or raptor to inhibit the autophagy process13. Several studies showed that glucocorticoid elevated autophagy-related genes stimulating autophagy process in lymphocytes and osteoblasts29,30. However, the glucocorticoid dosage to treat such inflammatory diseases in other types of tissues rather than brain is different from the stress-induced glucocorticoid level since it is designed to efficiently induce autophagic cell death. In contrast, our results showed that the deactivation of AMPK triggered phosphorylation of its substrate mTOR leading to defective autophagy, which agrees with glucocorticoid effect on altered mTOR signaling of brain in the previous report31. Our works showed that glucocorticoid inhibited selective autophagy towards the SCG10. Selective autophagy via ubiquitination is important to avoid the accumulation of redundant proteins32. In particular, selective autophagy serve as crucial regulator of microtubules responsible for migration, development, and differentiation33,34. There are many proteins subject to selective autophagy inducing axonal degeneration such as α-synuclein, huntingtin proteins, stathmin, and neurofilament. Namely, if defective autophagy clearance occurs, the microtubule dysfunction is likely to follow. Previous reports suggest that autophagy induction stabilizes neuronal microtubule via decreasing SCG10, indicating that autophagy plays a pivotal role in regulating SCG10 level35,36. Our results also indicated that selective ubiquitination of SCG10 among stathmin family was reduced by cortisol whereas inhibition of mTOR eventually triggered reduction in SCG10 level. However, the regulatory mechanism of SCG10 ubiquitination in neuronal cells should be further investigated.
SCG10-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics were already reported to be involved in memory formation, but the exact mechanism of how glucocorticoid induces memory deficits via microtubule dysfunction is far from clear. Mounting evidence also suggest that multiple bindings between kinesin-1 and α-tubulin move necessary components further than single binding, indicating that the kinesin-1 detachment from α-tubulin can dramatically fail to transfer cargos into cell terminus37. Thus, microtubule destabilization due to increased tyrosination of α-tubulin triggers reduction in the binding of kinesin-1 motor protein to α-tubulin9. Accordingly, we exhibited that decreasing SCG10 level with rapamycin restored the A/T ratio and kinesin-1 binding to α-tubulin. Stathmin-dependent changes in microtubule stability are widely known to influence memory formation. Several reports showed that transiently unstable microtubule is necessary for memory consolidation9. However, this report focused on the phosphorylation state of stathmin which inactivates its depolymerizing. On the other hand, previous research reported that excessive SCG10-tubulin binding significantly affects the microtubule stability, resulting in decreased intracellular transport into the synaptic sites9. Given the observations, we speculated that the glucocorticoid-treated cells are likely to fail transporting the necessary components for memory formation towards the cell periphery. Microtubule transports AMPARs and mitochondria to establish the memory consolidation and synaptic strength38 since they play a major role in establishing hippocampal LTP24,39. For example, the stathmin family regulates binding between AMPAR2 and kinesin-1 in synaptic sites maintaining memory function40. However, the relationship between glucocorticoid and trafficking of AMPAR or mitochondria has not yet been studied. We identified in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that the AMPAR and mitochondria transport into cellular extremities and synapse was significantly reduced upon glucocorticoid treatment. Furthermore, these works agree with the previous report demonstrating that excessive glucocorticoid triggers the synaptic dysfunction and hippocampal apoptosis with increased caspases41. We then used microtubule-stabilizing drug for helping microtubule become acetylated to confirm that microtubule is essential for intracellular transport42. Using paclitaxel that stimulates the recovery of the AMPAR and mitochondria levels in cell periphery, memory formation was restored to normal functions and the neuronal cell death was reduced, indicating that microtubule dynamics play an important role in memory function via normalizing intracellular transport. Therefore, our data demonstrate that glucocorticoid impairs the localization of memory-related receptors and mitochondria in the synapse by SCG10-mediated changes in microtubule stability.
In conclusion, the results of this study showed that glucocorticoid impairs microtubule function by reorganizing the ER-mitochondria interaction which inhibits selective autophagosome formation of SCG10 through inducing mitochondrial calcium influx and subsequent activating mTOR pathway. Furthermore, we also demonstrated the underlying mechanisms that microtubule destabilization by glucocorticoid finally decreases memory formation and induces neurodegeneration via inhibiting the transport of AMPAR and mitochondria into the cell terminus. Thus, our approach to investigate the new signaling pathways of glucocorticoid on memory deficits via microtubule dysfunction in the animal model and neuroblastoma cells can provide potential therapeutic targets that control the memory recovery.
Materials and methods
Materials
Cells from the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y were obtained by Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) and serum replacement (SR) were purchased from Hyclone (Logan, UT, USA) and Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA), respectively. The antibodies of mfn2 (sc-515647), VDAC1 (sc-390996), stathmin-1 (sc-48362), SCG10 (sc-135620), Bcl-2 (sc-492), p-mTOR (Ser2448, sc-8319), p-AMPK (Thr172, sc-33524), VAPB (sc-293364), and β-actin (sc-47778) were acquired from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The antibodies of TOMM20 (ab56783), IP3R (ab5804), and the product of xestospongin C were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, England). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch (West Groove, PA, USA). The antibodies of AMPAR1 (AB1504), AMPAR2 (AB1768-I), and PSD95 (MAB1596) were purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). The antibodies of AMPK (2532 S), mTOR (2983 S), and GR (12041 S) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA). The antibodies of LC3 (NB100-2220), p62 (NBP1-48320), Atg5 (NB110-53818), and kinesin-1 (NBP2-21667) were purchased from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO, USA). The antibodies of ubiquitin (701339) and PSD95 (51-6900) were obtained from Thermo Fisher (Rockford, IL, USA). The antibodies of COX IV (CSB-PA001765), Hsp90 (CSB0PA005496), Hsp70 (CSB-PA863082HA01HU), PACS2 (CSB-PA017372LA01HU), PTPIP51 (CSB-PA836307DSR2HU), and the chemical cortisol-BSA were obtained from Cusabio (Wuhan, Hubei, China). Cortisol, corticosterone, BSA, RU 486, paclitaxel, DAPI, actinomycin D, rapamycin, cycloheximide, MG132, Hoechst, ruthenium red, and the antibodies of acetylated α-tubulin (T7451), tyrosinated α-tubulin (T9028), α-tubulin (T6074) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA). VER 155008 was obtained from Calbiochem (Merk Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).
Cell culture
The SH-SY5Y cells were cultured in high glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Hyclone) containing 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic mixture. Cells were cultured in 60, 100 mm diameter culture dishes, or a 96-well plate in an incubator kept at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were incubated for 72 h and then the medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM containing 1% SR and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution for 24 h. The in vitro studies using SH-SY5Y cells are designed to investigate the effect of cortisol on microtubule dynamics-dependent intracellular trafficking.
Experimental design of animal study
Male ICR mice exposed to corticosterone mimic the stress-induced mouse model since corticosterone is primarily responsive steroid hormone to stress. The hippocampus of mice was mainly used for evaluating glucocorticoid effect on microtubule dynamics since the hippocampus has the most abundant GRs among the brain. Male ICR mice aged 7 weeks were used, in compliance and approval with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University (SNU-171017-9). Animals were housed 6 per cage under standard environmental conditions (22 °C relative humidity 70%; 12 h light: dark cycle; ad libitum access to food and drinking solution). Total seventy two of 7-week-old male ICR mice were used for the in vivo study. Six mice were utilized for each group throughout the study. Applying size of samples (minimum of n = 3) can be acceptable if very low p values are observed rather than the large size of N including interfering results43. Therefore, we set the minimum of n = 4 (western blotting, Immunohistochemistry (IHC)) and n = 6 (behavior test) to gain statistical powers according to the previous published article of brain44. The experiments were designed in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. Allocations of animals were randomly done to minimize the effects of subjective bias. No exclusion of data obtained from samples was done.
Corticosterone (10 mg/kg) was dissolved in the solution containing 50% propylene glycol in PBS and injected intraperitoneally14. Vehicle-treated mice were similarly injected with the solution containing propylene and PBS. Rapamycin (8 mg/kg) were dissolved in the solution containing 1% DMSO and 99% corn oil (Sigma Chemical Company). The dosage and treatment period of rapamycin is modified from previous reports45. The vehicle solution includes the 1% DMSO and 50% propylene glycol in PBS. Paclitaxel (15 mg/kg) was dissolved in the solution containing 50% β-cyclodextrin and treated 3 h before the corticosterone treatment following the modified method and dosage of previous report46. Vehicle-treated mice were similarly injected with the solution containing propylene glycol and β-cyclodextrin. Mice were monitored twice a day during all experiments.
Y-maze spontaneous alteration test
Y-maze spontaneous alteration test is based on the innate willingness of rodents to differently explore new environments. This behavior test is frequently used for quantifying the cognitive deficits of the animals. Rodents usually prefer to challenge a new arm of the Y-maze rather than returning back to the one which was previously visited. Before the test, the animals were placed in the home cage at the testing room for 3 h to minimize the effects of stress on behavior. The mice were placed in the Y-shaped maze purchased from Sam-Jung Company (Seoul, Korea). The mice were allowed to explore the open field for 10 min, and at the same time, the number of arm entries and triads were recorded to calculate the percentage of alteration. Only an entry when all four limbs were within the arm was counted. The alteration amount represents the number of alterations which was divided by total triads (total entries-2). When the animals show higher alteration percentage, the animals tend to maintain the memory function.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Mice underwent deep anesthesia with zoletil (50 mg/kg) and were perfused transcardially with calcium-free Tyrode’s solution followed by a fixative including 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphatebuffer (pH 7.4). The removed brain was post-fixed for 2 h, and subsequently placed in 30% sucrose in PBS for 24 h at 4 °C. Serial transverse sections (40 μm) were performed using a cryostat (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany). The brain tissues containing hippocampus were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then pre-blocked with 5% normal goat serum (Sigma Chemical Company) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS at room temperature for 1 h. Samples were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Completed samples were visualized by using Eclipse Ts2™ fluorescence microscopy (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The fluorescent intensity analysis was undertaken using Fiji software.
Synaptic protein extraction
Synaptosome of hippocampus was extracted using Syn-Per synaptic protein extraction reagent (Thermo Fisher). Hippocampus was homogenized with Dounce grinder with 20 slow strokes. The homogenates underwent centrifugation at 1200×g for 10 min at 4 °C. After discarding the pellet, the supernatant was centrifuged at 15,000×g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant part is cytosolic fraction and the pellet (synaptosome) was dissolved with the extraction reagent.
TUNEL assay
The cryo-sectioned brain tissue underwent the TUNEL assay using Click-iTTM TUNEL Alexa FluorTM 488 Imaging Assay (Thermo Fisher) to evaluate the apoptosis of hippocampal neuronal cells. The samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and then placed with 0.25% triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. The processes of TdT incorporation of EdUTP into dsDNA strand breaks and incubation with fluorescent dye detecting the EdUTP were conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were obtained by Eclipse Ts2™ fluorescence microscopy. The fluorescent intensity analysis was performed using Fiji software.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and real-time PCR
The SH-SY5Y cells were treated for 12 h with cortisol, and the total RNA was extracted using MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Otsu, Shinga, Japan). Reverse transcription was performed using 1 μg of RNA with a Maxime RT-PCR PreMix Kit (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea) to obtain cDNA. Two microliters of cDNA was then amplified using Quanti NOVA SYBR Green PCR Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Real-time quantification of RNA targets was performed in a Rotor-Gene 6000 real-time thermal cycling system (Corbett Research, NSW, Australia). The primers for microtubule associated proteins were purchased from the Bioneer Corporation (Daejeon, Korea). The reaction mixture (20 μl) contained 200 ng of total RNA, 0.5 mM of each primer, and appropriate amounts of enzymes and fluorescent dyes as recommended by the manufacturer. The real-time PCR was performed as follows: 15 min at 95 °C for DNA polymerase activation; 15 s at 95 °C for denaturing; and 50 cycles of 15 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 54 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. Data were collected during the extension step, and analysis was performed using the software provided; melting curve analysis was performed to verify the specificity and identity of the PCR products. Normalization of gene expression levels was performed by using the β-actin gene as a control.
Western blot analysis
Harvested tissues or cells were incubated with the appropriate buffer for 30 min on ice. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation (10,000×g at 4 °C for 30 min) and the supernatant was collected. To evaluate the protein concentration, the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used. Equal amounts of sample proteins (1–5 μg) were prepared for 8-15% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Subsequently, the membranes were blocked with 5% BSA or 5% skim milk (Gibco) in TBST solution for 30 min. Blocked membranes were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were then washed and incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h. The western blotting bands were visualized by using chemiluminescence solution (Bio-Rad) and the densitometry analysis for quantification was carried out by using Image J software.
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection
Cells were grown until 60% of the surface of the plate. Prior to cortisol treatment, siRNAs specific for bcl-2 and nontargeting (NT) obtained from Bioneer Corporation (Daejeon, Korea), and Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA), respectively, were transfected to cells for 24 h with turbofect transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of each transfected siRNA was 25 nM. NT siRNA was used as the negative control.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells on a confocal dish (Thermo Fisher) were fixed with 80% acetone for 10 min. Then, cells were incubated with 5% normal goat serum in PBS and incubated with primary antibody for overnight in 4 °C. Next, the cells were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with Alexa fluor secondary antibody. Images were obtained by Eclipse Ts2™ fluorescence microscopy or super-resolution radial fluctuations (SRRF) imaging system (Andor Technology, Belfast, UK)47. The fluorescent intensity analysis and co-localization analysis with Pearson’s correlation coefficient were acquired by Fiji software.
Measurement of cellular ATP levels
Intracellular ATP concentration level of cells was measured using ATP Bioluminescent HSII kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ATP levels were detected with luminometer (Victor3; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) and normalized to total protein concentration.
Co-immunoprecipitation
The magnetic bead conjugated with specific primary antibodies was immobilized according to the supplier’s instructions. The total lysates of cells (300 μg) was incubated with 10 μg of primary antibody for overnight at 4 °C. Magnetic beads were spun-down by magnet and then collected. The antibody-bound protein was acquired by incubation in elution buffer (Thermo Fisher).
In situ proximal ligation assay (PLA)
Duolink™ in situ PLA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma Chemical Company). After fixation and blocking at 37 °C, primary antibodies against rabbit anti-IP3R and mouse anti-VDAC1 were diluted in antibody diluent and then incubated overnight at 4 °C. The Duolink™ secondary antibodies against the particular primary antibodies were applied for 1 h at 37 °C. Ligase was then added for 1 h at 37 °C and then amplification was done. Fluorescent images were visualized with Eclipse Ts2™ fluorescence microscopy or SRRF imaging system.
Water soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1) assay
WST-1 assay was used for determining the cell proliferation and viability in vitro model. After treatment, cells were incubated in 10 μl of EZ-CytoxTM solution including WST-1 in 100 μl of medium for 30 min at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The absorbance of each sample using a microplate reader was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as mean value ± standard error of mean (S.E.M.) and analyzed with the sigma plot 10 software. All experiments were analyzed by ANOVA, and some experiments which needed to compare with 3 groups were examined by comparing the treatment means to the control using a Bonferroni-Dunn test. A result with a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2013M3A9B4076541 and NRF-2017R1A2B2008661) and BK21 PLUS Program for Creative Veterinary Science Research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection or analysis, the decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by A. Yaron
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-018-1172-y).
References
- 1.Brandt R, Bakota L. Microtubule dynamics and the neurodegenerative triad of Alzheimer’s disease: the hidden connection. J. Neurochem. 2017;143:409–417. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davidkova G, Carroll RC. Characterization of the role of microtubule-associated protein 1B in metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated endocytosis of AMPA receptors in hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:13273–13278. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3334-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mandal M, et al. Impaired α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor trafficking and function by mutant huntingtin. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:33719–33728. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.236521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Friedman JR, Webster BM, Mastronarde DN, Verhey KJ, Voeltz GK. ER sliding dynamics and ER–mitochondrial contacts occur on acetylated microtubules. J. Cell. Biol. 2010;190:363–375. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200911024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Green KN, Billings LM, Roozendaal B, McGaugh JL, LaFerla FM. Glucocorticoids increase amyloid-β and tau pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:9047–9056. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2797-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Akner G, Wikstro AC, Stro PE, Stockman O, Wallin M. Glucocorticoid receptor inhibits microtubule assembly in vitro. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1995;110:49–54. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(95)03515-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kershaw S, et al. Glucocorticoids stabilise the microtubule network to inhibit cell migration. Endocr. Abstr. 2015;38:OC3.2. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bezprozvanny I, Mattson MP. Neuronal calcium mishandling and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2008;31:454–463. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Uchida S, et al. Learning-induced and stathmin-dependent changes in microtubule stability are critical for memory and disrupted in ageing. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4389. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Du J, McEwen B, Manji HK. Glucocorticoid receptors modulate mitochondrial function: A novel mechanism for neuroprotection. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2009;2:350–352. doi: 10.4161/cib.2.4.8554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hedskog L, et al. Modulation of the endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria interface in Alzheimer’s disease and related models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013;110:7916–7921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300677110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cárdenas C, et al. Essential regulation of cell bioenergetics by constitutive InsP3 receptor Ca2+ transfer to mitochondria. Cell. 2010;142:270–283. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Galluzzi L, Pietrocola F, Levine B, Kroemer G. Metabolic control of autophagy. Cell. 2014;159:1263–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Choi GE, et al. Membrane-associated effects of glucocorticoid on BACE1 upregulation and Aβ generation: involvement of lipid raft-mediated CREB activation. J. Neurosci. 2017;37:8459–8476. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0074-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yoo SM, Jung YK. A molecular approach to mitophagy and mitochondrial dynamics. Mol. Cells. 2018;41:18. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2018.2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Du J, et al. Dynamic regulation of mitochondrial function by glucocorticoids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009;106:3543–3548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812671106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hunter RG, et al. Stress and corticosteroids regulate rat hippocampal mitochondrial DNA gene expression via the glucocorticoid receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016;113:9099–9104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602185113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Psarra AMG, Sekeris CE. Glucocorticoids induce mitochondrial gene transcription in HepG2cells: role of the mitochondrial glucocorticoid receptor. Biochim. Et. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2011;1813:1814–1821. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yao J, et al. Mitochondrial bioenergetic deficit precedes Alzheimer’s pathology in female mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009;106:14670–14675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903563106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McEwen BS, et al. Mechanisms of stress in the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2015;18:1353. doi: 10.1038/nn.4086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Picard M, McEwen BS. Mitochondria impact brain function and cognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111:7–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321881111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pinho CM, Teixeira PF, Glaser E. Mitochondrial import and degradation of amyloid-β peptide. Biochim. Et. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2014;1837:1069–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cárdenas C, Foskett JK. Mitochondrial Ca2+ signals in autophagy. Cell Calcium. 2012;52:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Krugers HJ, Hoogenraad CC, Groc L. Stress hormones and AMPA receptor trafficking in synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010;11:675. doi: 10.1038/nrn2913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Paillusson S, et al. There’s something wrong with my MAM; the ER–mitochondria axis and neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:146–157. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Area-Gomez E, et al. Presenilins are enriched in endoplasmic reticulum membranes associated with mitochondria. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;175:1810–1816. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gomez-Suaga P, et al. The ER-mitochondria tethering complex VAPB-PTPIP51 regulates autophagy. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:371–385. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pera M, et al. Increased localization of APP‐C99 in mitochondria‐associated ER membranes causes mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer disease. EMBO J. 2017;36:3356–3371. doi: 10.15252/embj.201796797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Molitoris JK, et al. Glucocorticoid elevation of dexamethasone-induced gene 2 (Dig2/RTP801/REDD1) protein mediates autophagy in lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:30181–30189. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.245423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shen Gengyang, Ren Hui, Shang Qi, Qiu Ting, Yu Xiang, Zhang Zhida, Huang Jinjing, Zhao Wenhua, Zhang Yuzhuo, Liang De, Jiang Xiaobing. Autophagy as a target for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis therapy. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2018;75(15):2683–2693. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2776-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang J, et al. Glucocorticoids suppress antimicrobial autophagy and nitric oxide production and facilitate mycobacterial survival in macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01174-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shaid S, Brandts C, Serve H, Dikic I. Ubiquitination and selective autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:21. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nunan J, et al. The C‐terminal fragment of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid protein precursor is degraded by a proteasome‐dependent mechanism distinct from γ‐secretase. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001;268:5329–5336. doi: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Grenningloh G, Soehrman S, Bondallaz P, Ruchti E, Cadas H. Role of the microtubule destabilizing proteins SCG10 and stathmin in neuronal growth. Dev. Neurobiol. 2004;58:60–69. doi: 10.1002/neu.10279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.He M, et al. Autophagy induction stabilizes microtubules and promotes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2016;113:11324–11329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611282113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shin JE, Geisler S, DiAntonio A. Dynamic regulation of SCG10 in regenerating axons after injury. Exp. Neurol. 2014;252:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vershinin M, Carter BC, Razafsky DS, King SJ, Gross SP. Multiple-motor based transport and its regulation by Tau. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007;104:87–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607919104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kaganovsky K, Wang CY. How do microtubule dynamics relate to the hallmarks of learning and memory? J. Neurosci. 2016;36:5911–5913. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0920-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brown TC, Tran IC, Backos DS, Esteban JA. NMDA receptor-dependent activation of the small GTPase Rab5 drives the removal of synaptic AMPA receptors during hippocampal LTD. Neuron. 2005;45:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dent EW. Of microtubules and memory: implications for microtubule dynamics in dendrites and spines. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2017;28:1–8. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e15-11-0769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sotiropoulos I, et al. Female hippocampus vulnerability to environmental stress, a precipitating factor in tau aggregation pathology. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015;43:763–774. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baas PW, Ahmad FJ. Beyond taxol: microtubule-based treatment of disease and injury of the nervous system. Brain. 2013;136:2937–2951. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vaux DL. Research methods: Know when your numbers are significant. Nature. 2012;492:180. doi: 10.1038/492180a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Olmos-Alonso A, et al. Pharmacological targeting of CSF1R inhibits microglial proliferation and prevents the progression of Alzheimer’s-like pathology. Brain. 2016;139:891–907. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Malagelada C, Jin ZH, Jackson-Lewis V, Przedborski S, Greene LA. Rapamycin protects against neuron death in in vitro and in vivo models of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:1166–1175. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3944-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fellner S, et al. Transport of paclitaxel (Taxol) across the blood-brain barrier in vitro and in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 2002;110:1309–1318. doi: 10.1172/JCI0215451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gustafsson N, et al. Fast live-cell conventional fluorophore nanoscopy with ImageJ through super-resolution radial fluctuations. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12471. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.