Skip to main content
Journal of Health & Pollution logoLink to Journal of Health & Pollution
. 2016 Jun 16;6(10):28–41. doi: 10.5696/2156-9614-6-10.28

Incidence Rates of Tuberculosis among Children and Adolescents Living in Areas Most Affected by the Chernobyl Disaster

Larissa Gorbach 1,
PMCID: PMC6236545  PMID: 30524783

Abstract

Background.

The Chernobyl accident has attracted the attention of healthcare experts all over the world due to the unprecedented scale of damage the disaster inflicted upon human health.

Objectives.

To examine incidence rates of tuberculosis and patterns among children and adolescents living in areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster between 2004 and 2014.

Methods.

The tuberculosis incidence rate was calculated per 100,000 people. Incidence dynamics were traced for the period 2004 to 2014 and average rates were measured. Average incidence rates were calculated for different age groups, including 0–4 years, 5–9 years, 10–14 years, and 15–19 years, as well as the total value for all those between 0–19 years of age. Average incidence rates were estimated for tuberculosis, pulmonary tuberculosis and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. A comparative analysis of incidence rates of tuberculosis in areas more and less affected by the Chernobyl disaster was conducted. To avoid gender and age disparities among the population in the two different study areas, a method of direct standardization was applied.

Results.

Tuberculosis incidence rates showed identical patterns among the population across all areas in this region. At the same time, the incidence rates of tuberculosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, and extrapulmonary tuberculosis were higher among children and adolescents living in the most affected areas in comparison to those living in less affected areas.

Conclusion.

The results do not allow us to conclude whether radioactive pollution has a direct impact on incidence of tuberculosis among children and adolescents in the most radioactively contaminated areas. The author believes that the higher incidence rates of tuberculosis in the most affected areas are conditioned by a set of negative factors that have a pernicious influence on the general health of the population, and on the health of children and adolescents in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster.

Keywords: Chernobyl accident, affected areas, children, adolescents, tuberculosis

Introduction

Thirty years ago, on April 26th, 1986, the largest accident in the history of the nuclear industry took place at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, leading to a massive release of radionuclides into the environment.1 An area of 155,000 square kilometers was contaminated, with 7.1 million residents. Russia, Ukraine and Belarus suffered most in the catastrophe, and approximately 70 percent of the radioactive fallout descended on Belarus, making it the worst contaminated of all the affected countries.1 The losses Belarus suffered during the 30-year period of disaster mitigation has been estimated at $235 billion. In 1985, this sum accounted for 32 annual budgets of the Belarusian state.2–4

In Belarus, the overall contaminated area was 46,450 km2 or about 23% of the country.4 The polluted territory was then a densely inhabited area in Belarus with 2.2 million residents.5 One half of the total number of 118 districts of Belarus was impacted by the Chernobyl disaster. Currently, 21 of the impacted districts are included in the list of the most affected areas.6,7

Over 135,000 people were resettled outside the contaminated areas. Some 1,650,000 people continued to live in the contaminated areas, including 344,000 children.4 Every fifth Belarusian, including over half a million children, was affected by the consequences of the nuclear accident.3

A mixture of radionuclides were released into the atmosphere for about 10 days. The majority of the released radionuclides had a short half-life, but there was a small quantity of radionuclides with a long half-life.8 Short-lived iodine-131 with an 8-day half-life and long-lived caesium-137 (137Cs) with a 30-year half-life were the two radionuclides that delivered the highest radiation dose to the population as a result of their release into the atmosphere.8

The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) reported that “iodine-131 was the main contributor to the thyroid doses, received mainly via internal irradiation within a few weeks after the accident. In contrast, 137Cs was (and remained) the main contributor to the doses to organs and tissues other than the thyroid, due to either internal or external irradiation; these doses would continue to be received at low rates over several decades”.8

UNSCEAR rates the collective thyroid dose to the 98 million residents of the former Soviet Union at 1,600,000 man Gray (man Gy) At the country level, the collective thyroid dose was highest in Ukraine (960,000 man Gy distributed over 51 million people), however the average thyroid dose in Ukraine was about 3 times lower than in Belarus.8 At the regional level, the highest collective thyroid dose was to the population of the Gomel region (located in Belarus), where a collective thyroid dose of about 320,000 man Gy was distributed over a population of 1.6 million people, corresponding to an average thyroid dose of about 200 milligray (mGy).8

Compared to Russia and Ukraine, Belarus recorded the highest (rounded) dose to the population of the contaminated areas exposed to radiation as a result of the Chernobyl accident.8 The average thyroid dose was 1.5 times higher in Belarus (182 mGy) than in Ukraine (123 mGy), and 6.7 times higher than in Russia (27 mGy).8 The average effective dose to this population between 1986 and 2005 was 1.2 times higher in Belarus (12 millisievert (mSv)) than in Ukraine (10 mSv), and 1.7 times higher than in Russia (7 mSv).8 The collective thyroid dose to this population group was 1.2 times higher in Belarus (320,000 man Gy) than in Ukraine (260,000 man Gy) and 4.6 times higher than in Russia (70,000 man Gy).8

Abbreviations

kBq

Kilobecquerels

man Gy

Man gray

mGy

Milligray

mSv

Millisievert

PBq

Petabecquerels

UNSCEAR

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation

WHO

World Health Organization

137Cs

Caesium-137

The average thyroid dose to children and teenagers was the highest in the Gomel region of Belarus and exceeded the rates recorded in other Belarusian regions, as well as in Russia and Ukraine.8 The average thyroid dose to pre-school children in the Gomel region was 475.8 mGy, 3.9 times higher than the average thyroid dose to pre-school children in the whole of Belarus (122 mGy) and 9.9 times higher than the average thyroid dose to pre-school children in all three countries combined (Belarus, Russia and Ukraine) (48 mGy).8 The average thyroid dose to school children in the Gomel region was 250.3 mGy, 4 times higher than the average thyroid dose to school children in the whole of Belarus (63 mGy) and 13.2 times higher than the average thyroid dose to school children of the three countries combined (19 mGy).8 The average thyroid dose to adolescents in the Gomel region was 145 mGy, 3.9 times higher than the average thyroid dose to adolescents in the whole of Belarus (37 mGy) and 11.2 times higher than the average thyroid dose to adolescents of the three countries combined (13 mGy).8

Most radionuclides released as a result of the Chernobyl disaster had disintegrated to lower levels by 2008. Currently, 137Cs remains the main contributor to the radiation dose.8 UNSCEAR reports 137Cs to be the main contributor to the dose to organs and tissues other than the thyroid, due to either internal or external irradiation, and contends that the afore-mentioned doses will continue at low rates over the next several decades.8

The total quantity of 137Cs deposited in the former Soviet Union as a result of the accident, including in areas of lesser deposition, was estimated to be approximately 40 PBq (petabecquerels), and apportioned as follows: 40% in Belarus; 35% in the Russian Federation; 24% in Ukraine; and less than 1% in other republics of the former Soviet Union. Regionally the highest estimate of 137Cs density is in the Gomel region at 154 kilobecquerels (kBq)/m2.8

The radioactive nuclides distributed by the Chernobyl accident in the environment had different characteristics as well as biological effects. Radioactive iodine led to substantial health effects as a result of the Chernobyl disaster. It has been recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) that the development of thyroid pathology and subsequent thyroid cancer development among the population affected by the Chernobyl disaster is a result of irradiation with radioactive iodine-131. From 1992 to 2002 in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine, more than 4000 cases of thyroid cancer were diagnosed among those who were children and adolescents (0–18 years) at the time of the accident.9

The impact of the Chernobyl accident on the health of the Belarus population has attracted the attention of healthcare experts all over the world due to the unprecedented scale of damage the Chernobyl disaster inflicted upon human health.10,11 Many people in Belarus have been exposed to long-term small-dose radiation that inflicted grave consequences on the health of the population, especially children.12 Aleynikova et al. reported an increased incidence of all types of chronic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the Gomel and Mogilev areas.13 An increase in breast cancer was observed in women from areas in the Gomel region where the deposits of 137Cs exceeded 555 kBq/m2 from 1990–2003. Breast cancer rates increased by 1.2% among the monitored women of the Vitebsk region and by 5.7% in the Gomel areas with deposits of 137Cs of more than 185 kBq/m2, while in the areas with deposits of 137Cs exceeding 555 kBq/m2 there was a breast cancer rate increase of 32.7%. The risk of breast cancer increased by 25% in women who live in contaminated areas. In addition, women aged between 55–59 years constitute the highest risk group in the most contaminated areas of the Gomel region, while in the Vitebsk region, the highest risk group consists of women aged 70–74 years (94.9 ± 6.8 per 100,000 female population). An increase of non-oncological diseases among the population in the contaminated areas such as autoimmune thyroiditis, cataracts and circulatory system diseases was also noted. The increase in disease incidence was linked with radiation exposure combined with a set of factors—environmental, anthropogenic, psychological, social and economic disturbances, the Soviet Union collapse and deterioration of the quality of life. The study also contends that exposure to ionizing radiation might have aggravated and ignited all of these negative factors.13

In addition, after the Chernobyl disaster, epidemiological surveys revealed a rise in the rate of tuberculosis in the radioactively polluted areas. The tuberculosis incidence rate in 1985 was 75.8 cases per 100,000 people and the most destructive forms of tuberculosis accounted for 17.2% of all cases, while in 1996 the tuberculosis incidence rate was 84.0 cases per 100,000 people and the most destructive forms of tuberculosis accounted for 41.7% of all cases.14

From 1991 to 1995, the tuberculosis incidence rates in Belarus increased by 42.5%, while the rates of mortality caused by tuberculosis increased by 28.6%.15–17 The incidence rates for pulmonary tuberculosis with bacterioexcretion increased from 12.8 cases per 100,000 people in 1991 to 17.9 cases in 1995.16 In the Gomel region the tuberculosis incidence rates increased from 50.4 cases per 100,000 people in 1993 to 60.5 cases per 100,000 people in 1994,15 and tuberculosis incidence rates in the radioactively polluted areas exceeded the national average by 43%.17 The spread of tuberculosis across the radioactively polluted areas has been linked with a comprehensive set of negative factors, such as cuts in the number of preventive X-ray examinations of the population, rising levels of migration outflow from the regions with high tuberculosis rates, worsening socioeconomic situation, poverty, micro-epidemics of tuberculosis among alcohol and drug addicts, and fear of X-rays.15,18,19

Studies conducted between 1983 and 1996 found higher rates of drug resistant tuberculosis, tuberculosis mortality rates and tuberculosis relapse rates in areas more affected by the Chernobyl disaster compared to areas less affected by the disaster.20–22

Tuberculosis incidence rates among children and adolescents from different areas of Belarus did not vary much before the Chernobyl disaster. After the disaster, tuberculosis incidence rates among children and adolescents increased in the Gomel region, reaching 2.7 times the national average in 1994, and tripling between 1985 to 1996, increasing from 4.1 cases per 100,000 people in 1985 to 12.8 cases per 100,000 people in 1996.15–18,23–26

Prior to this, tuberculosis incidence rates had decreased by 7.6% among children in the monitored areas of the Gomel region from 1981–1985. From 1991–1995, tuberculosis incidence rates among children in these areas increased by 45.8%.25,26

Currently, the incidence rates of tuberculosis in Belarus are significantly lower than those in other post-Soviet countries. However, according to the Global Tuberculosis Report 2015 of the WHO, Belarus was listed among 27 other countries with a high multidrug-resistant tuberculosis burden.27 Incidence rates of tuberculosis among children and adolescents are closely linked to the spread of tuberculosis among adults. Considering the prevalence of aggressive infections among the adult population, a study of tuberculosis incidence rates among children and adolescents is useful. Research on tuberculosis incidence rates among children and adolescents is also important for forecasting the future of the tuberculosis epidemic and developing appropriate prevention measures.

The objective of this study was to examine tuberculosis incidence rates and patterns among children and adolescents living in areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster, analyzing data from 2004 to 2014.

Methods

Radioactively contaminated areas were legally defined by the Republic of Belarus on May 26, 2012 in a statue (No. 385-3) titled “The legal regime for territories affected by radioactive contamination as a result of the disaster at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station”.28 The statute defined radioactive contamination zones as the areas across Belarus with a density of soil contamination of 137Cs, strontium-90, or plutonium- 238, -239, -240, equaling or exceeding 37, 5.55, and 0.37 kBq/m2 (1.0, 0.15, 0.01 Ci/km2), respectively. In addition, according to this legislation, the average annual effective radiation dose to the population in these territories may exceed 1 mSv (over the natural and technogenic background level). As a result of this law, radioactively polluted areas have been divided into the following zones:

  • 1. Evacuation zone (Exclusion zone)—the area around the Chernobyl nuclear station. The population in this area was evacuated in 1986 (30-km radius of land whose inhabitants were resettled due to soil contamination density of strontium-90 exceeding 111 kBq/m2 (3 Ci/km2) and the level of plutonium-238, -239, and -240 exceeded 3.7 kBq/m2 (0.1 Ci/km2)).

  • 2. Zone of primarily resettlement—area with soil contamination density of 137Cs exceeding 1480 kBq/m2 (40 Ci/km2) or soil contamination density of strontium-90 or plutonium-238, -239, and -240 exceeding 111 and 3.7 kBq/m2 (3 and 0.1 Ci/km2), respectively.

  • 3. Zone of subsequent resettlement—area with soil contamination density of 137Cs between 555-1480 kBq/m2 (15–40 Ci/km2), soil contamination density of strontium-90 between 74–111 kBq/m2 (2–3 Ci/km2), or soil contamination density of plutonium-238, -239, and -240 between 1.85–3.7 kBq/m2 (0.05–0.1 Ci/km2). The average annual effective radiation dose to the population in these territories may exceed 5 mSv (over the level of natural and technogenic background). The zone also includes areas with lower soil contamination density for these radionuclides, but where the average annual effective radiation dose to the population exceeded 5 mSv.

  • 4. Zone with the right of resettlement—area with soil contamination density of 137Cs between 185–555 kBq/m2 (5–15 Ci/km2), strontium-90 between 18.5–74 kBq/m2 (0.5–2 Ci/km2), or plutonium-238, -239, and -240 between 0.74–1.85 kBq/m2 (0.02–0.05 Ci/km2). The annual effective radiation dose to the population in those territories may exceed 1 mSv (over the level of natural and technogenic background). The zone also includes areas with lower soil contamination density of these radionuclides, but where the average annual effective radiation dose to the population exceeded 1 mSv.

  • 5. Zone of residence with periodic radiation monitoring—area with a soil contamination density of 137Cs between 37–185 kBq/m2 (1–5 Ci/km2), strontium-90 between 5.55–18.5 kBq/m2 (0.15–0.5 Ci/km2), or plutonium-238, -239, and -240 between 0.37–0.74 kBq/m2 (0.01–0.02 Ci/km2). The average annual effective radiation dose to the population in these territories may exceed 1 mSv (over the level of natural and technogenic background).

In Belarus, the Gomel region occupies the largest territory, accounting for a fifth of the country's land. This region was the most affected by the Chernobyl disaster. Table 1 gives the number of settlements located in the radioactively polluted territories in the Gomel region between 2004 and 2014, according to the data of the Central Statistics Committee of the Gomel region. Table 2 shows the total population living in the settlements in the Gomel region situated in the radioactively polluted areas between 2004 and 2014 according to the data of the Central Statistics Committee of the Gomel region.

Table 1.

Number of Settlements Located in the Radioactively Polluted Territories in the Gomel Region Between 2004–2014

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Total Number of Settlements Located in Radioactive Contamination Zones 1,481 1,427 1,426 1,426 1,404 1,404 1,402 1,313 1,309 1,308 1,308
Total number of settlements with resident population 1,462 1,414 1,414 1,410 1,396 1,391 1,385 1,299 1,289 1,278 1,277
Zones:Zones of residence with periodic radiation monitoring 748 801 802 802 795 794 790 939 932 929 928
Zones with right of resettlement 681 589 588 586 580 576 574 347 344 337 337
Zones of subsequent resettlement 33 24 24 22 21 21 21 13 13 12 12

Table 2.

Total Population Living in Settlements in the Gomel Region Situated in Radioactively Polluted Areas Between 2004–2014

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Population 1,142,201 1,023,944 1,017,956 1,013,215 1,012,087 1,011,955 1,000,627 879,335 882,655 886,375 889,374
Total population in zones of residence with periodic radiation monitoring 949,154 874,122 870,081 867,429 868,235 869,803 858,511 782,232 786,417 791,106 795,428
Total population in zones with the right of resettlement 177,456 145,923 144,066 142,204 140,856 139,182 139,220 95,261 94,413 93,477 92,158
Total population in zones of subsequent resettlement 15,591 3,899 3,809 3,582 2,996 2,970 2,896 1,842 1,825 1,792 1,788

Data adapted from statistics compiled by the Central Statistics Committee of the Gomel region.29

For the present study, a database was developed where all primary cases of tuberculosis among children and adolescents in the Gomel region during 2004–2014 were recorded. The Gomel region accounts for 25.2% of all registered tuberculosis cases among children and adolescents in the Republic of Belarus. The following criteria were considered in the analysis: tuberculosis verified by the bacteriological method and/or radiological method, patient age between 0–19 years, and permanent residence of patient in the Gomel region. Patient consent was obtained. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Research Practical Centre «Mother and Child» as part of the research project: “Development and Implementation of a Comprehensive System of Measures for Prevention of Tuberculosis among Children's Population in the Affected Areas.” (State registration number 20143300, date of registration 01/12/2014).

All children and adolescents diagnosed with tuberculosis and recorded in this database were then divided into two groups. The first group included children and adolescents living in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster. The second group included children and adolescents living in less affected areas of the Gomel region.

The overall characteristics of the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster in the Gomel region are presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Characteristics of the Gomel Areas Most Affected by the Chernobyl Disaster

Number Area Name Zones of Residence With Periodic Radiation Monitoring Zones with Right of Resettlement Zones of Subsequent Resettlement
1 Bragin present present absent
2 Buda-Koshelevo present present absent
3 Vetka present present present
4 Dobrush present present present
5 Elsk present present absent
6 Kalinkovichi present present absent
7 Korma present present absent
8 Lelchitsy present present absent
9 Narovlia present present present
10 Rahachou present present absent
11 Rechitsa present present absent
12 Khoiniki present present present
13 Chechersk present present present

Data adapted from statistics of the Department for Elimination of the Consequences of the Catastrophe at the Chernobyl NPP from the Ministry for Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus.30

The list of areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster was made in compliance with the decree of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus of June 9, 2000, No 845, and includes the following 13 areas in the Gomel region: Bragin, Buda-Koshelevo, Vetka, Dobrush, Elsk, Kalinkovichi, Korma, Lelchitsy, Narovlia, Rahachou, Rechitsa, Khoiniki and Chechersk.6 The location of these areas is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Map of Gomel region indicating the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster.

The list of less affected areas is comprised of 8 territories in the Gomel region that were not mentioned in the list of the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster, including the region's major city Gomel. These areas include Gomel city, Zhitkovichy, Zhlobin, Loyev, Mozyr, Octyabr, Petrikov, and Svetlogorsk.

Calculations were made for the intensive indicators of tuberculosis incidence rate per 100,000 people in the present study. The incidence dynamics were traced during the period from 2004 to 2014 and the average rates were measured. Average tuberculosis incidence rates were calculated for different age groups, including 0–4 years, 5–9 years, 10–14 years, and 15–19 years, as well as the total value for all those between 0–19 years. Average incidence rates were estimated for tuberculosis, pulmonary tuberculosis and extrapulmonary tuberculosis (for the period from 2004 to 2014). A comparative analysis of tuberculosis incidence rates in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster and less affected areas of the Gomel region was conducted. To avoid gender and age disparities among the population in the two different study areas, a method of direct standardization was applied. Data on age composition of the population of Belarus for the period 2004–2014 was used as a standard for calculating incidence rates. The official census data of the National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus for the population inhabiting the areas of the Gomel region and the Republic of Belarus in general were used for calculating indicators of tuberculosis incidence rates.

Results

From 2004–2014, tuberculosis incidence rates decreased among the population aged between 0–19 years living in the Gomel region. As depicted in Figure 2, a decrease in tuberculosis incidence rates was recorded among the population inhabiting both study areas. Nevertheless, tuberculosis incidence rates in the population in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster decreased at a swifter pace. The tuberculosis incidence rates in less affected areas decreased from 5.66 cases per 100,000 people in 2004 to 5.22 cases in 2014, a decrease of 7.8%. Simultaneously, the tuberculosis incidence rates among the population in the most affected areas decreased by 2.5 times—from 13.44 cases to 5.38 cases per 100,000 people.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Tuberculosis incidence rates among the population aged between 0–19 years in the Gomel region for the period 2004–2014

The observed decrease in the tuberculosis incidence rates among children and adolescents in the Gomel region from 2004–2014 may be explained by the reduced number of tuberculosis inspections conducted in Belarus. The annual screening by the Mantoux tuberculin skin test that had been compulsory for all children was cancelled in 2011. Moreover, the decrease in tuberculosis incidence rates in the Gomel region is in line with the general tendency of declining tuberculosis incidence rates currently observed throughout the world.

The average rate of tuberculosis incidence among children and adolescents aged 0–19 years for the period 2004–2014 was calculated. The average rate of tuberculosis incidence in the areas most affected by the disaster was determined to be 7.32 cases per 100,000 people, which is 1.5 times higher than the average rate of tuberculosis incidence in less affected areas (4.86 cases per 100,000 people).

To exclude differences in the age of the population in the two different study areas, standard rates of tuberculosis incidence in the population in the two different areas in the Gomel region between 2004 and 2014 were determined. A method of direct standardization was applied to determine standard rates. The composition of the Belarusian population aged between 0–19 years between 2004 and 2014 was taken as a standard. The results are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Tuberculosis incidence rates among those aged between 0–19 years in the Gomel region for the period 2004–2014 comparing standardized and non-standardized indicators.

As seen in Figure 3, after tuberculosis incidence rates were standardized, the disparity between the rates in the areas most affected by the disaster and less affected areas became more conspicuous. Before the standardization, the tuberculosis incidence in the most affected areas was 1.5 times higher than the tuberculosis incidence in less affected areas (7.32 vs 4.86 cases per 100,000 people), and after standardization the rate was 1.7 times higher (8.24 vs 4.79 cases per 100,000 people).

Therefore, supposing the population aged between 0–19 years in the two study areas of the Gomel region was age-homogeneous, tuberculosis incidence rates in the most affected areas would be 1.7 times higher than in less affected areas. Thus, the differences in the age structure of the population had an impact on tuberculosis incidence rates among these two different populations. These estimates may indicate higher prevalence rates of tuberculosis infection among children and adolescents in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster.

A study on tuberculosis incidence rates was carried out focusing on localization of the pathological process in the human body, i.e. pulmonary tuberculosis vs extrapulmonary tuberculosis. The average pulmonary tuberculosis incidence rates among the population aged between 0–19 years during 2004–2014 were determined. The pulmonary tuberculosis incidence rate in the most affected areas was 5.20 cases per 100,000 people, which is 1.4 times higher than the pulmonary tuberculosis incidence rates in less affected areas (3.75 cases per 100,000 people).

Similar to the results on tuberculosis incidence, standardized rates of pulmonary tuberculosis incidence in the population aged between 0–19 years in the two study areas were determined. The outcomes of those calculations are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Incidence rates of pulmonary tuberculosis among the population aged between 0–19 years in the Gomel region for the period 2004–2014 comparing standardized and non-standardized indicators.

As seen in Figure 4, after the pulmonary tuberculosis incidence rates were standardized by age, the disparity between the rates became more conspicuous. Before standardization, the pulmonary tuberculosis incidence in the most affected areas was 1.4 times higher than in less affected areas (5.20 vs. 3.75 cases per 100,000 people), and after standardization the rate was 2.9 times higher (6.13 vs. 2.11 cases per 100,000 people). Therefore, if we assume that the population in the two study areas in the Gomel region had a homogeneous age structure, the pulmonary tuberculosis incidence rates in the most affected areas would be 2.9 times higher than in less affected areas. Thus, the differences in age structure of the population had an effect on pulmonary tuberculosis incidence rates among the population in the two different study areas in the Gomel region. Again, these estimates may point to the higher incidence rates of pulmonary tuberculosis among children and adolescents in the most affected areas.

The average extrapulmonary tuberculosis incidence rate among the population aged between 0–19 years during 2004–2014 was determined. The average extrapulmonary tuberculosis incidence rate in the most affected areas was 2.12 cases per 100,000 people, which is 1.9 times higher than the rate in less affected areas (1.11 cases per 100,000 people). Extrapulmonary tuberculosis is characterized by a more severe clinical course. The disease is less effectively treated than pulmonary tuberculosis and there are more cases of failed treatment. The higher incidence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis among children and adolescents in the most affected areas indirectly indicates a more severe tuberculosis clinical course among the population in these areas. Similarly, standardized rates for extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the population aged between 0–19 years in the two different study areas were determined. The results are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Incidence rates of extrapulmonary tuberculosis among the population aged between 0–19 years in the Gomel region for the period 2004–2014 comparing standardized and non-standardized indicators.

As demonstrated by the results, standardization of rates did not impact the incidence ratio for extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the two different study areas. Before the rates were standardized, the incidence rate of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the most affected areas was 1.9 times higher than the rate of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in less affected areas (2.12 vs 1.11 cases per 100,000 people), and after standardization the same rate was found, i.e. a 1.9-fold difference (2.11 vs 1.11 cases per 100,000 people). Thus, differences in the age structure of the population did not affect the extrapulmonary tuberculosis incidence rates in the population of the two different areas in the Gomel region. As previously noted, these estimates suggest the presence of higher prevalence rates of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children and adolescents in the most affected areas. The average incidence rates in different age groups (0–4; 5–9; 10–14; 15–19 years) in the two study areas for the period 2004–2014 were determined. The results of the calculations are shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Average tuberculosis incidence rates across age groups living in the Gomel region for the period 2004–2014

It has been found that tuberculosis incidence rates increase with age, which is a general characteristic of tuberculosis epidemiology. The present study found this trend to be a long-standing pattern for both of the study areas. The lowest tuberculosis rates were detected in the youngest age group (0–4 years). The tuberculosis incidence rates for the group aged between 0–4 years in the most affected areas were 15.1% lower than in the less affected areas (1.8 cases per 100,000 people in the most affected areas vs 2.12 cases in less affected areas). For the group aged between 5–9 years, tuberculosis incidence rates were higher than for the group aged between 0–4 years. The tuberculosis incidence rates for the group aged between 5–9 years were 1.8 times higher in the most affected areas compared to the less affected areas (4.44 cases vs 2.51 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). For the group aged between 10–14 years, tuberculosis incidence rates were relatively identical for the two study areas (3.62 cases vs 3.67 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The low tuberculosis incidence rates for the groups aged between 0–4, 5–9 and 10–14 years may be partially explained by insufficient tuberculosis diagnostics among children in these age groups.

The highest incidence of tuberculosis was detected in the oldest age group (between 15–19 years). The tuberculosis incidence was 2.1 times higher in the most affected areas than in less affected areas (19.53 cases vs 9.36 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The tuberculosis incidence rates observed for the group aged between 15–19 years may be a more realistic reflection of the general epidemic situation of tuberculosis among the population, because in Belarus, adolescents at this age are examined for tuberculosis more thoroughly. The population aged between 15–19 years is screened for tuberculosis by the following two methods: skin testing (Mantoux tuberculin skin test or the Diaskin test) and by the radiological method.

The present study revealed a higher tuberculosis incidence among adolescents living in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster than from less affected areas, as well as different tendencies in incidence rates of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis among various age groups of the population.

The incidence rates of pulmonary tuberculosis in the population of the two study areas had identical patterns and were marked by a wide range of fluctuations—from 0.36 cases to 17.4 cases per 100,000 people. While rates were low among children, rates were high among adolescents. This pattern is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Average pulmonary tuberculosis incidence rates across age groups in the Gomel region for the period 2004–2014

The lowest pulmonary tuberculosis incidence rates were detected in children in the youngest age group (0–4 years) living in the most affected areas, 2.9 times lower than in less affected areas (0.36 cases vs 1.06 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis in children aged between 5–9 years living in the most affected areas was higher than in less affected areas (1.48 cases vs 1.16 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The incidence rates of pulmonary tuberculosis in children aged between 10–14 years were 1.8 times higher in the most affected areas than in less affected areas (2.62 cases in the most affected areas vs 1.48 cases per 100,000 people in less affected areas). The highest incidence rates of pulmonary tuberculosis were found in adolescents aged between 15–19 years. Thus, the incidence rates in the most affected areas were 2.1 times higher than in less affected areas (17.4 cases vs 8.32 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The discrepancy between the incidence rates of pulmonary tuberculosis may be closely related to the dissimilar requirements for tuberculosis screening among different age groups of the population. For instance, younger children are selectively examined for tuberculosis and only by the Mantoux tuberculin skin test.

A dramatically different tendency was revealed in the analysis of incidence rates of extrapulmonary tuberculosis among different age groups of the population. These rates showed only minor fluctuations compared to pulmonary tuberculosis. The highest incidence was estimated at 2.96 cases per 100,000 people, while the lowest rate was 1.04 cases per 100,000 people. The incidence for all age groups was higher among the population in the most affected areas compared to less affected areas. This pattern is shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Average incidence rates of extrapulmonary tuberculosis across age groups in the Gomel region for the period 2004–2014

The incidence rates of extrapulmonary tuberculosis for the youngest age group (0–4 years) of the population in the most affected areas were 1.4 times higher than for the same age group in less affected areas (1.44 cases vs 1.06 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The incidence rates of extrapulmonary tuberculosis among children aged 5–9 years in the most affected areas were 2.2 times higher than for the same age group in less affected areas (2.96 cases vs 1.35 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The incidence rates of extrapulmonary tuberculosis for children aged between 10–14 years was 1.9 times higher in the most affected areas than in less affected areas (1.97 cases vs 1.05 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The incidence rates of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the adolescent population (15–19 years) in the most affected areas were twice as high as those in less affected areas (2.13 cases vs 1.04 cases per 100,000 people, respectively). The results of the present study demonstrate that the incidence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis was higher among children and adolescents (across all age groups) living in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster. The results also indicate that the population in the most affected areas suffers from a more severe clinical course of tuberculosis.

Discussion

The present research revealed similar epidemiological tendencies in tuberculosis distribution in all study areas among those aged between 0–19 years. From 2004 to 2014, there was a decrease in tuberculosis incidence across all areas of the Gomel region. The observed decrease in tuberculosis incidence rates in the Gomel region appears to be in line with the general tendency of declining tuberculosis incidence rates currently observed globally.

At the same time, the present study found that the tuberculosis incidence was higher in the most affected areas compared to less affected areas. The tuberculosis incidence rates among the population in the most affected areas were 1.5 times higher than among the population in less affected areas. The current research found a higher incidence of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the population in the most affected areas. The incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis among the population aged 0–19 years from the most affected areas was 1.4 times higher than in the same age group in less affected areas. The incidence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis was 1.9 times higher in the population of the most affected areas than in the population of less affected areas.

After standardization, the disparity between the tuberculosis incidence rates in the two study areas increased. The same pattern was noted for pulmonary tuberculosis incidence. The results demonstrated that the higher prevalence of tuberculosis and pulmonary tuberculosis in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster is not conditioned by the age structure of the population in those areas. This clearly points to a higher prevalence of tuberculosis infection among the population in the areas most affected by the disaster.

In the course of the comparative analysis of the tuberculosis incidence across age groups, a clear pattern emerged showing that the incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis increased with age. The highest rates of pulmonary tuberculosis were detected in the oldest age group of adolescents, those between 15–19 years. The same pattern was found both of the study areas. Moreover, the incidence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in all studied age groups was higher in the most affected areas.

Conclusion

The results of the present study do not allow us to conclude whether radioactive pollution has a direct impact on tuberculosis incidence among children and adolescents in the most radioactively contaminated areas of the Gomel region. However, the author believes that the higher tuberculosis incidence rates in the most affected areas of the Gomel region are conditioned by a set of negative factors that have a pernicious influence on the health of the population in these areas.

The results of the present study demonstrate the need for further research on the health of children and adolescents in the areas of the Gomel region most affected by the Chernobyl disaster. The incidence of tuberculosis in children and adolescents as well as in adults should be studied in these areas. A comparative study of the immune system of children and adolescents with latent and active tuberculosis who live in different areas in the Gomel region is another potential area for further research, with an evaluation of individual absorbed doses. Modern laboratory, micro–biological, molecular genetic and immunologic technologies should be applied in the course of such research.

The Expert Group on Health presented a report at the United Nations Chernobyl Forum titled “Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident and Special Health Care Programmes”, and researchers emphasized the urgency and importance of conducting monitored surveys on infectious diseases and the immune condition of children in the affected and non-affected territories.31

The results of the present study demonstrate the need for enhanced tuberculosis prevention among children and adolescents living in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster. The data acquired in the course of the present research can be further applied to the planning and implementation of tuberculosis prevention campaigns among the population in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster.

Acknowledgments

The author expresses gratitude to Igor Semenenya, head of the Division for Research and International Cooperation, Department for Elimination of the Consequences of the Catastrophe at the Chernobyl NPP, Ministry for Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus, for his valuable advice on approaches to the analysis of the research outcomes. The author expresses gratitude to Konstantin Vilchuk, Director of the National Research Practical Centre «Mother and Child», for his kind assistance in the organization of field trips to the Gomel region. The author expresses gratitude to Alexander Shiryaev, Director the Gomel Regional Tuberculosis Clinical Hospital; Sergey Butko, Deputy Director for Organizational and Methodological Work at Gomel Regional Tuberculosis Clinical Hospital, and Valentina Gorbachyova, chief expert on childhood tuberculosis of the Gomel region, for their help in collecting data on children and adolescents diagnosed with tuberculosis. The author also expresses gratitude to Tatiana Tishkevich, specialist at the Centre for International Cooperation and Educational Programmes, Academy of Public Administration under the aegis of the President of the Republic of Belarus, for her assistance in translating the present article into English.

References

  • 1.Annan KA. Chernobyl: a continuing catastrophe [Internet] New York: United Nations; 2000 [cited 2016 Apr 26]. p. 28. p. Available from: https://docs.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/Chernobyl_2000.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rzheutskaya VV, editor. A quarter of a century after the Chernobyl catastrophe: outcomes and prospects for the mitigation of consequences [Internet] Minsk, Belarus: Ministry for Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus, Department for Mitigation of the Consequences of the Catastrophe at the Chernobyl NPP; 2011[cited 2016 Apr 26]. p. 82. editor. p. Available from: http://chernobyl.info/Portals/0/Docs/BelNationalReport-2011-eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malofeev AA. Vstupitel'noe slovo [Opening remarks] In: Rolevicha IV, editor. Problemy likvidacii v Respublike Belarus' posledstvij katastrofy na Cernobyl'skoj AES [Elimination of problems in the Republic of Belarus consequences of the Catastrophe at the Chernobyl NPP ] [Internet]. Doklady na parlamentskih slusanijah Palaty predstavitelej i Soveta Respubliki Nacional'nogo sobranija Respubliki Belarus' [Reports at the parliamentary hearings The House of Representatives and the Council of the Republic National Assembly of Belarus]; 1999 Apr 21; Minsk, Belarus. Minsk, Belarus: Ministerstvo po crezvycajnym situacijam Respubliki Belarus' [The Ministry for Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus]; 1999 [cited 2016 Apr 26]. pp. 6–7. In. editor. p. Available from: http://www.progettohumus.it/include/bielorussia/docs/reportkom/UdienzaCernobyl99.pdf Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.The human consequences of the Chernobyl nuclear accident: a strategy for recovery [Internet] New York: United Nations Development Programme; 2002 Feb 6 [cited 2016 Apr 26]. p. 75. p. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/strategy_for_recovery.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Konoplya EF, Rolevich IV, . Cernobyl'skaja avarija: posledstvija i ih preodolenie [The Chernobyl accident: the consequences and how to overcome them] [Internet] Baranovichy, United Press: Ministerstvo po crezvycajnym situacijam Respubliki Belarus', Nacionalnaja akademija nauk Belarusi [The Ministry for Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus]; 1998 [cited 2016 Apr 28]. p. 102. editors. p. Available from: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/30/006/30006827.pdf Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O nekotoryh merah ekonomiceskoj podderzki organizacij potrebitel'skoj kooperacii, raspolozennyh v naibolee postradavsih ot avarii na Cernobyl'skoj AES rajonah respubliki [On certain measures of economic support to consumers cooperation organizations located in the country's areas most affected by the disaster at the Chernobyl NPS] [Internet] Minsk, Belarus: Postanovlenie Soveta Ministrov Respubliki Belarus' [Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus]; 2000 Jun 9 [cited 2016 Apr 28]. p. 469. No. 845. p. Available from: http://pravo.newsby.org/belarus/postanovsm10/sovm883.htm Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bashilov AV, Borisevich NY, Goranskaya EI, Sobolev OV, Trafimshik ZI, . Belarus' i Cernobyl': 27 let spustja [Belarus and Chernobyl: 27 Years Later] [Internet] Minsk, Belarus: Ministerstvo po crezvycajnym situacijam Respubliki Belarus' [The Ministry for Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus]; 2013 [cited 2016 Apr 28]. p. 104. editors. p. Available from: http://venezuela.mfa.gov.by/docs/27_%C3%B0_%C3%B0%C2%B5%C3%B1_.pdf Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation. Vol. 2 [Internet] New York: United Nations; 2011 Apr [cited 2016 Apr 29]. p. 219. p. Available from: http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/11-80076_Report_2008_Annex_D.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chernobyl's legacy: health, environmental and socio-economic impacts and recommendations to the governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Vol. 2 [Internet] Vienna: The Chernobyl Forum; 2003–2005 [cited 2016 Apr 29]. p. 57. p. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/chernobyl.pdf Second revised version. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian and disaster relief assistance of the United Nations, including special economic assistance: strengthening of international cooperation and coordination of efforts to study, mitigate and minimize the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. Fiftieth session [Internet] New York: United Nations General Assembly; 1995 Sep 8 [cited 2016 Apr 29]. p. 19. p. Report No.: A/50/418. Available from: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/docs/50/plenary/a50-418.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Postoyalko LA. Medicinskie posledstvija Cernobyl'skoj katastrofy v Belarusi: problemy i perspektivy [Health effects of the Chernobyl disaster in Belarus: problems and prospects] Medicinskie Novosti [Health News] [Internet] 2004 [cited 2016 Apr 29];11:3–7. Available from: http://www.mednovosti.by/journal.aspx?article=2073 Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nesterenko VB. Opasnyj uroven' nakoplenija radionuklidov cezija-137 v organizme detej Cernobyl'skoj zony Belarusi i neobhodimost' ih radiacionnoj zasity [Dangerous Level of Accumulation of Caesium-137 Radionuclides in Children of the Chernobyl Area of Belarus and the Necessity in Their Radiation Protection] In: Rolevich IV, editor. Problemy likvidacii v Respublike Belarus' posledstvij katastrofy na Cernobyl'skoj AES [Elimination of problems in the Republic of Belarus consequences of the Catastrophe at the Chernobyl NPP ] [Internet] Minsk, Belarus: Ministerstvo po crezvycajnym situacijam Respubliki Belarus' Komitet po problemam posledstvij katastrofy na Cernobyl'skoj AES [The Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus, the Committee on the Health Effects of the Chernobyl disaster]; 1999 Apr 21 [cited 2016 Apr 29]. pp. 90–104. In. editor. p. Available from: http://www.progettohumus.it/include/bielorussia/docs/reportkom/UdienzaCernobyl99.pdf Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aleinikova OV, Vilchuk KU, Gurmanchuk IE, Gusev SG, Demidchik EP, Demidchik JE, Kapitonova EK, Kolbanov VV, Laziyuk GI, Potapnev MP, Sosnovskaya EY. Medicinskie posledstvija katastrofy na Cernobyl'skoj AES [Health effects of the Chernobyl accident] In: Shevchuk VE, Gurachevskiy VL, . 20 let posle Cernobyl'skoj katastrofy: posledstvija v Respublike Belarus' i ih preodolenie [20 years after the Chernobyl catastrophe: the consequences in the Republic of Belarus and their overcoming] [Internet] Minsk, Belarus: Komitet po problemam posledstvij katastrofy na Cernobyl'skoj AES pri Sovete Ministrov Respubliki Belarus' [Committee on the Problems of the Consequences of the Catastrophe at the Chernobyl NPP under the Belarusian Council of Ministers]; 2006 [cited 2016 Apr 29]. pp. 45–60. In. editors. p. Available from: http://www.chernobyl.gov.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32&Itemid=19 Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Godlevsky I, Nasvit O. Dynamics of health status of residents in the Lugyny district after the accident at the ChNPS. In: Imanaka T, editor. Research activities about the radiological consequences of the Chernobyl NPS accident and social activities to assist the sufferers by the accident [Internet] Osaka, Japan: Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University; 1998 Mar [cited 2016 Apr 29]. pp. 149–56. In. editor. p. Available from: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Godlevsky.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Borschevsky VV, Kalechitc OM, Bogomazova AV. [Medical biological aspects of the Chernobyl accident]; no. 1. Minsk, Belarus: Ministerstvo Zdravoohranenija Respubliki Belarus' [Ministry of Health of the Republic of Belarus]; 1996. [Tendencies in the tuberculosis morbidity after the Chernobyl accident in Belarus] pp. 33–7. In. p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Borschevsky VV, Kalechitc OM, Bogomazova AV. [Ecologic anthropology: almanac] Minsk, Belarus: [Belarus Committee for Chernobyl Children]; 1997. [Epidemiology of tuberculosis in Belarus during the Post-Chernobyl period] pp. 187–8. In. p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Borschevsky VV, Kalechitc OM, Krivonos PS, Bogomazova AV. Gomel, Belarus: Gomel'skij Gosudarstvennyj Medicinskij Universitet [Gomel State Medical Institute]; 1995. [Epidemic situation on tuberculosis in Belarus in the post-Chernobyl period] p. 243. [Proceedings of the International Research Conference Dedicated to the 5th Anniversary of the Gomel State Medical Institute]; 1995 Nov 9–10; Gomel, Belarus. p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Borschevsky VV, Kalechitc OM, Bogomazova AV. [Nine years since Chernobyl: health implications] Minsk, Belarus: 1995. [The tuberculosis incidence among the Belarusian Population: before and after the Chernobyl disaster] pp. 131–41. In. [publisher unknown] p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Antypova SI, Suvorova IV, Babichevskaya AI. Minsk, Belarus: 1998. [The incidence of active tuberculosis among the population impacted by the Chernobyl disaster] pp. 26–7. [Proceedings of the 6th Summit of Phthisiatricians of Belarus] [publisher unknown] p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Golyshevskaia VI, Cheshek VG, Shevchenko NI. [The microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis in areas under strict radiation control] Probl Tuberk. 1993;(6):30–2. Russian. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chernetsky VD, Gelberg IS. Tuberkulez v sovremennyh social'nyh, ekonomiceskyh i radio ekologiceskyh uslovijayh Respubliki Belarus' [Tuberculosis in modern social, economic and environmental radio conditions of Belarus] Gomel, Belarus: 1997. Dinamika epidemiologicheskih pokazateley po tuberculezu v raionah radiacionnogo kontrolaj [Dynamics of epidemiological rates of tuberculosis in the radiation-monitored areas; pp. 36–7. In. [publisher unknown] p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Negerish AI, Levchuk LI, Papkov MM. [Tuberculosis issue in a transformed ecologic and social environment] Grodno, Belarus: 1994. [Epidemic situation on Tuberculosis in districts of Brest Region polluted with radionuclides] pp. 34–7. In. [publisher unknown] p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kalechits OM, Al'khimovich VA. [Tuberculosis and the Chernobyl tragedy: status and prognosis] Probl Tuberk. 1990;(11):14–6. Russian. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brylina IV, Sokolovsky EI, Rusanov DU. Gomel, Belarus: 1997. [Particular characteristics of Tuberculosis in respiratory organs of children in the Gomel Region after the Chernobyl disaster] p. 67. [Proceedings of the International Research Congress “Chernobyl–Vilsede VII”] [publisher unknown] p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sokolovsky EI, Brylina IV. [Tuberculosis in modern social, economic and environmental radio conditions of Belarus] Gomel, Belarus: 1997. [Tuberculosis among children in the districts of the Gomel Region polluted by radionuclides] pp. 42–8. In. [publisher unknown] p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sokolovsky EI, Brylina IV. [Chernobyl: ecology and health] Gomel, Belarus: 1996. [Tuberculosis in children in the Gomel Region: before and after the Chernobyl disaster] pp. 24–8. In. [publisher unknown] p. Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Global tuberculosis report 2015 [Internet] 20th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015 [cited 2016 May 2]. p. 192. p. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/ [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zakony Respubliki Belarus' [Law of the Republic of Belarus] [Internet] Minsk, Belarus: Nacional'nyj reestr pravovyh aktov Respubliki Belarus' [The National Register of Legal Acts of the Republic of Belarus]; 2012 May 29 [cited 2016 May 2]. O pravovom rezime territorij, podvergsihsja radioaktivnomu zagrjazneniju v rezul'tate katastrofy na Cernobyl'skoj AES [On legal regime for territories affected by radioactive contamination as a result of the disaster at the Chernobyl NPS]. No. 63, 2/1937; pp. 13–27. In. p. Available from: http://www.pravo.by/pdf/2012-63/2012-63(004-027).pdf Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gomel, Belarus: Glavnoe statisticeskoe upravlenie Gomel'skoj oblasti [Central Statistics Committee of the Gomel Region]; c2014 [cited 2016 May 2]. Cislo naselennyh punktov, raspolozennyh v zonah radioaktivnogo zagrjaznenija, cislennost' prozivajusego v nih naselenija po Gomel'skoj oblasti [Number of settlements located in the radioactively polluted territories, total population living in these settlements of the Gomel Region] [Internet] Available from: http://gomel.belstat.gov.by/ofitsialnaya-statistika/otrasli-statistiki/naselenie/demografiya_2/osnovnye-pokazateli-za-period-s-__-po-____gody_3/chislo-naselennyh-punktov-raspolozhennyh-v-zonah-radioaktivnogo-zagryazneniya-chislennost-prozhivayuschego-v-nih-naseleniya/ Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harakteristika postradavsih rajonov [Characteristics of the most affected areas] Minsk, Belarus: Ministerstvo po crezvycajnym situacijam Respubliki Belarus', Departament po likvidacii posledstvij katastrofy na Cernobyl'skoj AES [The Ministry for Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus, Department for Elimination of the Consequences of the Catastrophe at the Chernobyl NPP]; c2011 [cited 2016 May 2]. Available from: http://www.chernobyl.gov.by/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=88&Itemid=38 Russian. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bennett B, Repacholi M, Carr Z, . Health effects of the Chernobyl accident and special health care programmes: report of the UN Chernobyl forum expert group “Health” [Internet] Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006 [cited 2016 May 2]. p. 160. editors. p. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43447/1/9241594179_eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Health & Pollution are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES