Skip to main content
Journal of Health & Pollution logoLink to Journal of Health & Pollution
. 2016 Jun 21;6(10):103. doi: 10.5696/2156-9614-6.10.103

Comment on “Effect of Mercury Exposure on Renal Function and Hematological Parameters among Artisanal and Smallscale Gold Miners at Sekotong, West Lombok, Indonesia”

SMJ Mortazavi 1,2, Ghazal Mortazavi 3, Maryam Paknahad 4,
PMCID: PMC6236552  PMID: 30524790

Correspondence is not peer reviewed. Opinions expressed are that of the author.

With great interest, we have read the article by Ekawanti and Krisnayanti1 entitled “Effect of Mercury Exposure on Renal Function and Hematological Parameters among Artisanal and Smallscale Gold Miners at Sekotong, West Lombok, Indonesia” that is published in the Journal of Health & Pollution Vol. 5, No. 9, 2015. Ekawanti and Krisnayanti investigated the effects of mercury exposure on renal function along with the hematological parameters of gold miners and the community as a first indication of mercury exposure symptoms. The authors assessed the correlations between mercury exposure and several health parameters such as urine protein level, hemoglobin, hematocrit, urine and hair mercury levels in two different mercury exposure groups, miners and non-miners. This investigation concluded that miners and non-miners showed significant differences in all health parameters except for hair mercury value, which showed no significant difference between the miners and non-miners. The general population is primarily exposed to methylmercury through their diet (particularly seafood) and mercury from dental amalgam.2 Mercury is widely believed to be a main global contaminant of aquatic food chains.3 Numerous studies show that ingestion of fish contaminated with methyl mercury may cause adverse health effects, particularly when this exposure occurs in utero.4 It is worth noting that besides consumption of sea foods, mercury released from dental amalgam fillings should also be taken into account in these studies. Furthermore, we have also shown that exposure to electromagnetic fields generated in magnetic resonance imaging or electromagnetic fields generated by common mobile phones significantly increase the mercury release from dental amalgam restorations.5,6 These findings have been further confirmed by some microleakage studies.7,8 Moreover, Kursun et al. demonstrated that exposure to X-rays, an ionizing component of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum, can increase the mercury release from amalgam fillings.9 These findings have recently been reviewed by Mortazavi and Mortazavi.10 Therefore, as Ekawanti and Krisnayanti did not evaluate the income level of the study participants and their nutritional status, confounding factors such as the frequency of fish/seafood consumption and other parameters which affect the amount of mercury release from amalgam restorations, including the number of amalgam fillings, the size of the fillings, and the composition of amalgam have possibly decreased the accuracy of their findings. Moreover, any other factors that cause load over the restorations such as the pattern of tooth brushing, chewing habits, and bruxism in both miners and non-miners may have possibly affected the findings of this study.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Shiraz, Iran.

References

  • 1.Ekawanti A, Krisnayanti BD. Effect of Mercury Exposure on Renal Function and Hematological Parameters among Artisanal and Small-scale Gold Miners at Sekotong, West Lombok, Indonesia. J Health Pollut. 2015;5:25–32. doi: 10.5696/2156-9614-5-9.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clarkson TW, Vyas JB, Ballatori N. Mechanisms of mercury disposition in the body. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50(10):757–64. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Elliott JE, Kirk DA, Elliott KH. Mercury in Forage Fish from Mexico and Central America: Implications for Fish-Eating Birds. Arc Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015;69(4):375–89. doi: 10.1007/s00244-015-0188-x. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buchanan S, Anglen J, Turyk M. Methyl mercury exposure in populations at risk: Analysis of NHANES 2011–2012. Environ Res. 2015;140:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mortazavi SM, Neghab M, Anoosheh SM. High-field MRI and mercury release from dental amalgam fillings. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2014;5:316–101. et al. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mortazavi SM, Daiee E, Yazdi A. Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11:1142–6. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1142.1146. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yilmaz S, Misirlioğlu M. The effect of 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2013;42(8):20130072. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shahidi SH, Bronoosh P, Alavi AA. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2009;38:470–4. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30077669. et al. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kursun S, Öztas B, Atas H, Tastekin M. Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva. Oral Radiol. 2014;30(2):142–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mortazavi G, Mortazavi SM. Increased Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Restorations after Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields as a Potential Hazard for Hypersensitive People and Pregnant Women. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):287–92. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Health & Pollution are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES