Abstract
Topological indices correlate certain physicochemical properties like boiling point, stability, and strain energy of chemical compounds. In this report, we compute M-polynomials for PAMAM dendrimers and polyomino chains. Moreover, by applying calculus, we compute nine important topological indices of under-study dendrimers and chains.
1. Introduction
The polyomino chains constitute a finite 2-connected floor plan, where each inner face (or a unit) is surrounded by a square of length one. We can say that it is a union of cells connected by edges in a planar square lattice. For the origin of dominoes, we quote [1]. The polyomino chains have a long history dating back to the beginning of the 20th century, but they were originally promoted by Golomb [2, 3]. Dendrimers [4] are repetitively branched molecules. The name comes from the Greek word, which translates to “trees.” Synonymous terms for dendrimers include arborols and cascade molecules. The first dendrimer was made by Fritz Vögtle in [5]. For detailed study about dendrimer structures we refer the reader to [6–9].
Many studies have shown that there is a strong intrinsic link between the chemical properties of chemical compounds and drugs (such as melting point and boiling point) and their molecular structure [10, 11]. The topological index defined on the structure of these chemical molecules can help researchers better understand the physical characteristics, chemical reactivity, and biological activity [12]. Therefore, the study of topological indices of chemical substances and chemical structures of drugs can make up for the lack of chemical experiments and provide theoretical basis for the preparation of drugs and chemical substances. In the previous two decades, a number of topological indices have been characterized and utilized for correlation analysis in pharmacology, environmental chemistry, toxicology, and theoretical chemistry [13]. Hosoya polynomial (Wiener polynomial) [14] plays a pivotal role in finding topological indices that depend on distances. From this polynomial, a long list of distance-based topological indices can be easily evaluated. A similar breakthrough was obtained recently by Klavžar et al. [15], in the context of degree-based indices. In the year 2015, authors in [15] introduced the M-polynomial, which plays similar role “to what Hosoya polynomial does” to determine many topological indices depending on the degree of end vertices [16–20].
In the present paper, we compute M-polynomials for different dendrimer structures and polyomino chains. By applying fundamental calculus, we recover nine degree-based topological indices for these dendrimers and chains.
2. Basic Definitions and Literature Review
In this paper, we fixed G as a connected graph, V (G) is the set of vertices, E (G) is the set of edges, and dv is the degree of any vertex v. Most of the definitions presented in this section can be found in [17].
Definition 1 (see [15]). —
The M-polynomial of G is defined as
(1) where δ = min{dv∣v ∈ V(G)}, Δ = max{dv∣v ∈ V(G)}, and mij(G) is the edge vu ∈ E(G) that is i ≤ j.
The very first topological index was the Wiener index, defined by Wiener in 1945, when he was studying boiling point of alkane [21]. For comprehensive details about the applications of Wiener index, see [22, 23]. After that, in 1975, Milan Randić [24] introduced the first degree-based topological index, which is now known as Randić index and is defined as
| (2) |
The generalized Randić index is defined as
| (3) |
The inverse generalized Randić index is defined as
| (4) |
It can be seen easily that the Randić index is particular case of the generalized Randić index and the inverse generalized Randić index. Other oldest degree-based topological indices are Zagreb indices. The first Zagreb index is defined as
| (5) |
and the second Zagreb index is defined as
| (6) |
The second modified Zagreb index is defined as
| (7) |
For detailed study about Zagreb indices, we refer the reader to [30–32]. There are many other degree-based topological indices, for example, symmetric division index:
| (8) |
harmonic index:
| (9) |
inverse sum index:
| (10) |
augmented Zagreb index:
| (11) |
We refer to [33–45] for detailed survey about the above defined indices and applications. Tables exhibited in [15–19] relate some notable degree-based topological indices with M-polynomial with the following notations [17]:
| (12) |
3. Computational Results
In this section we give our computational results.
3.1. M-Polynomials and Degree-Based Indices for PAMAM Dendrimers
Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers are hyperbranched polymers with unparalleled molecular uniformity, narrow molecular weight distribution, defined size and shape characteristics, and a multifunctional terminal surface. These nanoscale polymers consist of an ethylenediamine core, a repetitive branching amidoamine internal structure, and a primary amine terminal surface. Dendrimers are “grown” off a central core in an iterative manufacturing process, with each subsequent step representing a new “generation” of dendrimer. Increasing generations (molecular weight) produce larger molecular diameters, twice the number of reactive surface sites and approximately double the molecular weight of the preceding generation. PAMAM dendrimers also assume a spheroidal, globular shape at generation 4 and above (see molecular simulation below). Their functionality is readily tailored, and their uniformity, size, and highly reactive “molecular Velcro” surfaces are the functional keys to their use. Here we consider PD1, which denote PAMAM dendrimers with trifunctional core unit generated by dendrimer generations Gn with n growth stages, and PD2, the PAMAM dendrimers with different core generated by dendrimer generators Gn with n growth stages. DS1 is kinds of PAMAM dendrimers with n growth stages
Theorem 2 . —
For the PAMAM dendrimers PD1, we have
(13)
Proof —
Let PD1 denote PAMAM dendrimers with trifunctional core unit generated by dendrimer generations Gn with n growth stages.
The edge set of PD1 has following four partitions:
(14) Now
(15) and
(16)
Theorem 3 . —
For the PAMAM dendrimers PD1, we have
1. M1(G) = 105 × 2n+1 − 108.
2. M2(G) = 111 × 2n+1 − 117.
3. mM2(G) = 2n+1 + 19 × 2n−1 − 21/4.
4. Rα(G) = 3 × 2n+α + (3α+1 + 22α × 9)(2n+1 − 1) + 2α × 3α+1(7 · 2n − 4).
5. Rα(G) = 3 × 2n−α + (1/3α−1 + 9/22α)(2n+1 − 1) + (1/(3α−1 × 2α))(7 · 2n − 4).
6. SSD(G) = 7 × 2n+3 + 3 × 2n+1 + 47 × 2n − 54.
7. H(G) = (7/5) × 2n+4 − 54/5
8. I(G) = (497/20) × 2n+1 − 513/20.
9. A(G) = 3 × 2n+3 + 21 × 2n+2 + 369 × 2n−2 − 753/8.
Proof —
Let PD1 denote PAMAM dendrimers with trifunctional core unit generated by dendrimer generations Gn with n growth stages. Let
(17) Then
(18)
(1) First Zagreb Index
| (19) |
(2) Second Zagreb Index
| (20) |
(3) Modified Second Zagreb Index
| (21) |
(4) Generalized Randić Index
| (22) |
(5) Inverse Randić Index
| (23) |
(6) Symmetric Division Index
| (24) |
(7) Harmonic Index
| (25) |
(8) Inverse Sum Index
| (26) |
(9) Augmented Zagreb Index
Theorem 4 . —
For the PAMAM dendrimers PD2, we have
(27)
Proof —
Let PD2 be the PAMAM dendrimers with different core generated by dendrimer generators Gn with n growth stages. Then the edge set of PD2 has following four partitions:
(28) Now
(29) and
(30)
Theorem 5 . —
For the PAMAM dendrimers PD2, we have
1. M1(G) = 5(7 × 2n+3 − 26).
2. M2(G) = 37 × 2n+3 − 140.
3. mM2(G) = (23/3) × 2n+1 − 77/12.
4. Rα(G) = 2n+α+2 + (4 × 3α + 2α+1 × 3α × 7)(2n+1 − 1) + 22α(24 · 2n − 11).
5. Rα(G) = 2n + (4/3α + 14/6α)(2n+1 − 1) + (1/22α)(24 · 2n − 11).
6. SSD(G) = (109/3) × 2n+2 − 197/3.
7. H(G) = (7/5) × 2n+6 − 131/10.
8. I(G) = (497/15) × 2n+1 − 154/5.
9. A(G) = 475 × 2n − 427/2.
Theorem 6 . —
For the PAMAM dendrimers DS1, we have
(31)
Proof —
Let DS1 be kinds of PAMAM dendrimers with n growth stages.
The edge set of DS1 has the following three partitions:
(32) Now
(33) and
(34)
Theorem 7 . —
For the PAMAM dendrimers DS1, we have
1. M1(G) = 4(7 × 3n+1 − 16).
2. M2(G) = 8(11 × 3n − 9).
3. mM2(G) = 4 × 3n − 3.
4. Rα(G) = 3n × 4α+1 + (2α+1 × 5 + 23α+2)(3n − 1).
5. Rα(G) = 3n/4α−1 + (5/22α−1 + 1/23α−2)(3n − 1).
6. SSD(G) = 47 × 3n − 30
7. H(G) = (119/15) × 3n − 19/5
8. I(G) = (278/15) × 3n − 46/3.
9. A(G) = (3280/27) × 3n − 112.
3.2. M-Polynomials and Degree-Based Indices for Polyomino Chains
From the geometric point of view, a polyomino system is a finite 2-connected plane graph in which each interior cell is encircled by a regular square. In other words, it is an edge-connected union of cells in the planar square lattice. Polyomino chain is a particular polyomino system such that the joining of the centers (set ci as the center of the ith square) of its adjacent regular composes a path c1, c2, c3,…cn.
Let Bn be the set of polyomino chains with n squares. There are 2n+1 edges in every Bn ∈ Bn, where Bn is named as a linear chain and denoted by Ln if the subgraph of Bn induced by the vertices with d(v)=3 is a molecular graph with exactly n-2 squares. Also, Bn can be called a zigzag chain and labelled as Zn if the subgraph of Bn is induced by the vertices with d(v)>2 is Pn.
The angularly connected, or branched, squares constitute a link of a polyomino chain. A maximal linear chain (containing the terminal squares and kinks at its end) in the polyomino chains is called a segment of polyomino chain. Let l(S) be the length of S which is calculated by the number of squares in S. For any segment S of a polyomino chain, we get l(S) ∈ {2,3, 4,…, n}. Furthermore, we deduce l1 = n and m=1 for a linear chain Ln with n squares and li = 2 and m=n-1 for a zigzag chain Zn with n squares.
In what follows, we always assume that a polyomino chain consists of a sequence of segments S1, S2, S3,…Sn and L(Si) = li, where m ≥ 1 and i ∈ {2,3, 4,…, m}. We derive that ∑i=1mli = n + m − 1.
Theorem 8 . —
For a linear polyomino chain Ln, we have M(Ln; x, y) = 2x2y2 + 4x2y3 + (3n − 5)x3y3.
Proof —
Let Ln be the polyomino chain with n squares where l1 = n and m=1. Ln is called the linear chain.
The edge set of Ln has the following three partitions:
(35) Now
(36) and
(37)
(38)
Theorem 9 . —
For a linear polyomino chain Ln, we have the following:
1. M1(G) = 18n − 2.
2. M2(G) = 27n − 13.
3. mM2(G) = (1/3)n − 11/18.
4. Rα(G) = 22α+1 + 2α+2 · 3α + 32α(3n − 5).
5. Rα(G) = 1/2α−1 + 22−α/3α + (1/32α)(3n − 5).
6. SSD(G) = 6n + 8/3.
7. H(G) = n + 14/15.
8. I(G) = (9/2)n − 7/10.
9. A(G) = (2187/64)n − 573/64.
Theorem 10 . —
Let Zn be zigzag polyomino chain with n squares such that li = 2 and m = n − 1. Then
(39)
Proof —
Let Zn be zigzag polyomino chain with n squares such that li = 2 and m = n − 1. Polyomino chain consists of a sequence of segments S1, S2,…Sm and l(Si) = li where m ≥ 1 and i ∈ {1,2,…, m}.
The edge set of Zn has the following five partitions:
(40) Now
(41) and
(42)
Theorem 11 . —
For the Zigzag polyomino chain Zn for n ≥ 2, we have the following:
1. M1(G) = 24n − 4m − 10.
2. M2(G) = 48n − 16m − 40.
3. mM2(G) = (1/2)n + (1/3)m + 37/18
4. Rα(G) = 22α+1 + 2α+2 × 3α + 23α+1(m − 1) + 3α × 22α+1 + 24α(3n − 2m − 5).
5. Rα(G) = 1/22α−1 + 1/(3α · 2α−2) + (1/23α−1)(m − 1) + 1/(22α−1 × 3α) + (1/24α)(3n − 2m − 5).
6. SSD(G) = 6n + m + 11/6
7. H(G) = (3/4)n + (1/6)m + 61/60.
8. I(G) = (3/5)n − (4/3)m − 92/35.
9. A(G) = (512/9)n − (592/27)m − 118688/3375.
Theorem 12 . —
For the polyomino chain with n squares and of m segments S1 and S2 satisfying l1 = 2 and l2 = n − 1, Bn1 (n ≥ 3), we have
(43)
Proof —
Let Bn1 (n ≥ 3) be the polyomino chain with n squares and of m segments S1 and S2 satisfying l1 = 2 and l2 = n − 1. The edge set of Bn1 (n ≥ 3) has the following five partitions:
(44) Now
(45) and
(46)
(47)
Theorem 13 . —
For the polyomino chain with n squares and of m segments S1 and S2 satisfying l1 = 2 and l2 = n − 1, Bn1 (n ≥ 3), we have the following:
1. M1(G) = 18n.
2. M2(G) = 27n − 8.
3. mM2(G) = n/3 + 43/72.
4. Rα(G) = 22α+1 + 6α × 5 + 23α + 32α(3n − 10) + 3α+1 × 4α.
5. Rα(G) = 1/22α−1 + 5/6α + 1/23α + (1/32α)(3n − 10) + 1/(22α × 3α−1).
6. SSD(G) = 6n + 43/12.
7. H(G) = n + 6/7.
8. I(G) = 27n − 709/10.
9. A(G) = (2187/64)n − 33737/4000.
Theorem 14 . —
For polyomino chain with n squares and m segments S1, S2,…, Sm (m ≥ 3) satisfying l1 = lm = 2 and l2,…, lm−1 ≥ 3, Bn2 (n ≥ 4), we have
(48)
Proof —
Let Bn2 (n ≥ 4) be a polyomino chain with n squares and m segments S1, S2,…, Sm (m ≥ 3) satisfying l1 = lm = 2 and l2,…, lm−1 ≥ 3. Then the edge set of Bn2 (n ≥ 4) has the following five partitions:
(49) Now
(50) and
(51)
(52)
Theorem 15 . —
For polyomino chain with n squares and m segments S1, S2,…, Sm (m ≥ 3) satisfying l1 = lm = 2 and l2,…, lm−1 ≥ 3, Bn2 (n ≥ 4), we have the following:
1. M1(G) = 2(9n + m − 2).
2. M2(G) = 3(9n + 2m − 7).
3. mM2(G) = (1/3)n + 7/12
4. Rα(G) = 32α+1n + (3α × 2α+1 − 2 × 32α+1 + 3α × 22α+2)m + (1 + 3α+1)22α+1 + 23α+1 + 32α+1.
5. Rα(G) = (1/32α−1)n + (1/(3α · 2α−1) + 2/32α−1 + 1/(22α−2 × 3α))m + (1 − 1/3α−1)(1/22α−1) + 1/23α−1 + 1/32α−1.
6. SSD(G) = 6n + (2/3)m + 5/2
7. H(G) = n − (2/35)m + 20/21.
8. I(G) = (9/2)n + (9/35)m − 47/42.
9. A(G) = (2187/64)n + (11809/4000)m − 134177/8000.
4. Conclusions
Topological indices calculated in this paper help us to guess biological activities, chemical reactivity, and physical features of under-study dendrimers and polyomino chains. For example, Randić index is useful for determining physiochemical properties of alkanes as noticed by chemist Milan Randić in 1975. He noticed the correlation between the Randić index and several physicochemical properties of alkanes like boiling point, vapor pressure, enthalpies of formation, surface area, and chromatographic retention times. Hence our results are helpful in determination of the significance of PAMAM dendrimers and polyomino chains in pharmacy and industry.
Acknowledgments
The first author is funded by Dong-A University, Korea.
Contributor Information
Waqas Nazeer, Email: nazeer.waqas@ue.edu.pk.
Shin Min Kang, Email: smkang@gnu.ac.kr.
Data Availability
All data required for this research is included within this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.
Authors' Contributions
All authors contributed equally to this paper.
References
- 1.Go T. In: Handbook of discrete and computational geometry. Goodman J. E., O'Rourke J., editors. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 1997. (CRC Press Series on Discrete Mathematics and its Applications). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Golomb S. W. Polyominoes, Puzzles, Patterns, Problems, And Packings. Princeton University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alonso L., Cerf R. The three dimensional polyominoes of minimal area. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 1996;3(1 R):1–39. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Astruc D., Boisselier E., Ornelas C. Dendrimers designed for functions: from physical, photophysical, and supramolecular properties to applications in sensing, catalysis, molecular electronics, photonics, and nanomedicine. Chemical Reviews. 2010;110(4):1857–1959. doi: 10.1021/cr900327d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vögtle F., Richardt G., Werner N. Dendrimer Chemistry Concepts, Syntheses, Properties, Applications. 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Farahani M. R., Gao W., Kanna M. R. The connective eccentric index for an infinite family of dendrimers. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 2015;5(S4):766–771. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gao W., Shi L., Farahani M. R. Distance-based indices for some families of dendrimer nanostars. IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2016;46(2):168–186. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gao W., Wang W. Degree-based indices of polyhex nanotubes and dendrimer nanostar. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. 2016;13(3):1577–1583. doi: 10.1166/jctn.2016.5083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gao W., Farahani M. R. The hyper-zagreb index for an infinite family of nanostar dendrimer. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences & Cryptography. 2017;20(2):515–523. doi: 10.1080/09720529.2016.1220088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gao W., Farahani M. R., Shi L. The forgotten topological index of some drug structures. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2016;32(1):579–585. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gao W., Wang Y., Wang W., Shi L. The first multiplication atom-bond connectivity index of molecular structures in drugs. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2017;25(4):548–555. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gao W., Younas M., Farooq A., et al. M-Polynomials and Degree-Based Topological Indices of the Crystallographic Structure of Molecules. Biomolecules. 2018;8(4):p. 107. doi: 10.3390/biom8040107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang H., Zhang F. The Clar covering polynomial of hexagonal systems. Discrete Applied Mathematics. 1996;69(1-2):147–167. doi: 10.1016/0166-218X(95)00081-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wiener H. Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1947;69(1):17–20. doi: 10.1021/ja01193a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deutsch E., Klavžar S. M-Polynomial and degree-based topological indices. Iranian Journal of Mathematical Chemistry. 2015;6:93–102. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Munir M., Nazeer W., Rafique S., Kang S. M. M-polynomial and related topological indices of nanostar dendrimers. Symmetry. 2016;8(9):p. 97. doi: 10.3390/sym8090097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Munir M., Nazeer W., Nizami A. R., Rafique S., Kang S. M. M-polynomials and topological indices of titania nanotubes. Symmetry. 2016;8(11):p. 117. doi: 10.3390/sym8110117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kwun Y. C., Munir M., Nazeer W., Rafique S., Min Kang S. M-Polynomials and topological indices of V-Phenylenic Nanotubes and Nanotori. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08309-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Munir M., Nazeer W., Rafique S., Nizami A. R., Kang S. M. Some computational aspects of boron triangular nanotubes. Symmetry. 2017;9(6) doi: 10.3390/sym9010006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Munir M., Nazeer W., Rafique S., Kang S. M. M-polynomial and degree-based topological indices of polyhex nanotubes. Symmetry. 2016;8(12):p. 149. doi: 10.3390/sym8120149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dobrynin A. A., Entringer R., Gutman I. Wiener index of trees: theory and applications. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae. 2001;66(3):211–249. doi: 10.1023/a:1010767517079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mohar B., Pisanski T. How to compute the Wiener index of a graph. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry. 1988;2(3):267–277. doi: 10.1007/BF01167206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhou B., Gutman I. Relations between Wiener, hyper-Wiener and Zagreb indices. Chemical Physics Letters. 2004;394(1–3):93–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Randić M. On characterization of molecular branching. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1975;97(23):6609–6615. doi: 10.1021/ja00856a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kang S. M., Zahid M. A., Nazeer W., Gao W. Calculating the Degree-based Topological Indices of Dendrimers. Open Chemistry. 2018;16(1):681–688. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bollobás B., Erdös P. Graphs of extremal weights. Ars Combinatoria. 1998;50:225–233. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amić D., Bešlo D., Lučić B., Nikolić S., Trinajstić N. The Vertex-Connectivity Index Revisited. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 1998;38(5):819–822. doi: 10.1021/ci980039b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hu Y., Li X., Shi Y., Xu T., Gutman I. On molecular graphs with smallest and greatest zeroth-order general randić index. MATCH - Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry. 2005;54(2):425–434. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Caporossi G., Gutman I., Hansen P., Pavlović L. Graphs with maximum connectivity index. Computational Biology and Chemistry. 2003;27(1):85–90. doi: 10.1016/S0097-8485(02)00016-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gutman I., Das K. C. The first Zagreb index 30 years after. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry. 2004;50(1):83–92. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Das K. C., Gutman I. Some properties of the second Zagreb index. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry. 2004;52(1):1–3. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gutman I. An exceptional property of first Zagreb index. MATCH - Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry. 2014;72(3):733–740. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huang Y., Liu B., Gan L. Augmented Zagreb index of connected graphs. MATCH - Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry. 2012;67(2):483–494. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nazeer W., Farooq A., Younas M., Munir M., Kang S. On Molecular Descriptors of Carbon Nanocones. Biomolecules. 2018;8(3):p. 92. doi: 10.3390/biom8030092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kwun Y., Virk A., Nazeer W., Rehman M., Kang S. On the Multiplicative Degree-Based Topological Indices of Silicon-Carbon Si2C3-I [p, q] and Si2C3-II [p, q] Symmetry. 2018;10(8):p. 320. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kang S., Iqbal Z., Ishaq M., Sarfraz R., Aslam A., Nazeer W. On Eccentricity-Based Topological Indices and Polynomials of Phosphorus-Containing Dendrimers. Symmetry. 2018;10(7):p. 237. doi: 10.3390/sym10070237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kwun Y. C., Ali A., Nazeer W., Ahmad Chaudhary M., Kang S. M. M-Polynomials and Degree-Based Topological Indices of Triangular, Hourglass, and Jagged-Rectangle Benzenoid Systems. Journal of Chemistry. 2018;2018:8. doi: 10.1155/2018/8213950.8213950 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu J.-B., Pan X.-F., Yu L., Li D. Complete characterization of bicyclic graphs with minimal Kirchhoff index. Discrete Applied Mathematics. 2016;200:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2015.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu J.-B., Wang W.-R., Zhang Y.-M., Pan X.-F. On degree resistance distance of cacti. Discrete Applied Mathematics: The Journal of Combinatorial Algorithms, Informatics and Computational Sciences. 2016;203:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2015.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu J.-B., Pan X.-F. Minimizing Kirchhoff index among graphs with a given vertex bipartiteness. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2016;291:84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.06.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gao W., Jamil M. K., Javed A., Farahani M. R., Wang S., Liu J.-B. Sharp Bounds of the Hyper-Zagreb Index on Acyclic, Unicylic, and Bicyclic Graphs. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. 2017;2017:5. doi: 10.1155/2017/6079450.6079450 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu J.-B., Gao W., Siddiqui M. K., Farahani M. R. Computing three topological indices for Titania nanotubes TiO2[m,n] AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics. 2016;13(3):255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.akcej.2016.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liu Q., Liu J.-B., Cao J. The Laplacian polynomial and Kirchhoff index of graphs based on R-graphs. Neurocomputing. 2016;177:441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.11.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu J.-B., Wang S., Wang C., Hayat S. Further results on computation of topological indices of certain networks. IET Control Theory & Applications. 2017;11(13):2065–2071. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2016.1237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Huo Y., Liu J.-B., Baig A. Q., Sajjad W., Farahani M. R. Connective eccentric index of NAnm manotube. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. 2017;14(4):1832–1836. doi: 10.1166/jctn.2017.6512. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data required for this research is included within this paper.
