Correction to: Research Integrity and Peer Review (2018) 3:8 10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5
Following publication of this article [1] it was brought to our attention that we omitted to provide credit for Table 1. While the content of the table and the systematization of blinding in review have been referenced in the text as coming from [2], the credit line for Table 1 should have been added as follows: “Reproduced with permission from [2] licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 License”. The original publication of this article has been corrected accordingly.
References
- 1.Horbach SPJM, Halffman W. The changing forms and expectations of peer review. Res Integ Peer Rev. 2018;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pontille D, Torny D. The blind shall see! The question of anonymity in journal peer review. Ada J Gend New Med Technol. 2014;4. 10.7264/N3542KVW.