Ureaplasma species have been largely considered as commensal or opportunistic pathogens inhabiting urogenital and respiratory tracts of vertebrate hosts. However, some Ureaplasma species such as Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum in humans (1) and Ureaplasma diversum in bovine species (2,3), have been recognized as important pathogens. Cattle diseases associated with U. diversum infection include seminal vesiculitis, balanoposthitis, and alterations in spermatozoids in bulls and pneumonia, placentitis, abortion and birth of weak calves, in cows (2–5).
Ureaplasma diversum in bovine species has been reported in several countries including Brazil (6,7), France (8), Canada (9,10), Costa Rica (11), Argentina (12), and Australia (13). In Canada, U. diversum has been identified in the reproductive tracts of cattle without clinical signs, in dairy cows with granular vulvitis (9,10) and in aborted bovine fetuses (14), showing lymphofollicular conjunctivitis and/or pneumonia and in some cases, destructive polyarthropathy (5). Several cases of cow abortions from 2010 to 2016, in the province of Quebec (Canada), have been associated with U. diversum, with a significant increase in 2015 and 2016, as reported by the Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ) (15).
Identification of U. diversum can be done by bacterial isolation or by PCR assay. Bacterial culture is laborious and time-consuming while PCR assays are less time-consuming and more sensitive for detecting U. diversum in bovine clinical samples (16).
A new quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) diagnosis assay for the identification of U. diversum in bovine clinical samples was developed at the molecular diagnostic laboratory (MDL) of the Faculté de médecine vétérinaire (FMV) of the Université de Montréal, adapted from Marques et al (17). During the validation of this U. diversum qPCR diagnostic assay, 133 samples, including lung, nasal, and vaginal swabs, feces, milk, placenta, intestine, fetal tissues, synovial membrane and joint, serum and pools of tissues were used to determine the specificity of this assay. The samples came from various animal species, namely, pigs, cattle, cats, sheep, birds, dogs, goats, raccoons, and alpacas. Interestingly, 2 lung samples from pigs were found positive for U. diversum during the validation process. In Canada, this Ureaplasma species has never been reported in animal species other than cattle. To our knowledge, it has been reported once in swine worldwide and, more specifically, in Cuba (18). Ureaplasma diversum positive porcine lung samples came from 2 unrelated clinical cases which were submitted to MDL in 2015 and in 2016.
Case descriptions
Case 1 (FMV15-1774804). A boar from an insemination center was submitted for necropsy at the Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ) veterinary pathology laboratory in Quebec city, in June 2015 with a history of loss of appetite and a peak body temperature of 40°C. The diagnosis was a multicentric lymphosarcoma with gastric rupture and secondary peritonitis explaining the poor condition of this animal. However, there was also a broncho-interstitial pneumonia with bronchial-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT) hyperplasia, alveolar and interlobular edema, as well as infiltration of foamy macrophages arranged in small sheets, in some alveoli, strongly suggestive of a mycoplasma infection.
As requested by the pathologist, several diagnostic assays were performed but the results for these tests (Table 1) were not initially available to the FMV’s employees who use a different computer system than do the MAPAQ’s employees. Because qPCR for both Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma hyorhinis were negative, PCR for Mycoplasma spp. was requested, which interestingly, was found to be positive. Additional sequencing of the PCR amplicon was also requested and revealed 100% homology with Ureaplasma spp. which was subsequently confirmed to be U. diversum by a specific qPCR assay at Prairie Diagnostic Services (PDS) in Saskatoon.
Table 1.
Diagnostic assay results obtained from the 2 porcine U. diversum positive lung samples.
Pathogens | Case 1a | Case 2b | Type of diagnostic assay |
---|---|---|---|
PRRSV | − | + | qPCR |
PCV2 | nt | − | qPCR |
Influenza A virus | − | − | qPCR |
Streptococcus spp. | + | − | Bacterial culture |
Trueperella pyogenes | + | − | Bacterial culture |
Actinobacillus indolicus | + | − | Bacterial culture |
Haemophilus parasuis | − | − | Bacterial culture |
Mycoplasma spp. | + | + | PCR |
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae | − | + | qPCR |
Mycoplasma hyorhinis | − | + | qPCR |
Ureaplasma diversum | + | + | qPCR |
Case 1 — Boar from an insemination center subjected to necropsy on June 2015.
Case 2 — Three to six-month-old fattening pig euthanized and submitted to necropsy on April 2016.
PCV2 — porcine circovirus type 2; nt — Not tested.
Case 2 (FMV16-1864716). A 3- to 6-month-old fattening pig with a mycoplasma-type cough was euthanized and submitted to MAPAQ’s veterinary pathology laboratory in Quebec city, in April 2016, less than a year after the submission of the previous case. The pig came from a herd of 1200 animals with a mortality of 2.08% and respiratory clinical signs affecting 33% of the pigs for 1 month. Similar pulmonary histological lesions, as described for case 1, were present. However, the lung sample was positive by qPCR for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyorhinis, as well as positive for Mycoplasma spp. Being aware at the MAPAQ laboratory of the previous U. diversum positive case, sequencing of Mycoplasma spp. PCR amplicon was performed, showing again the presence of U. diversum, but this time with 99% homology. Other tests were negative (Table 1).
Results
During the validation of a new U. diversum qPCR assay at FMV, the lung samples from these 2 cases were randomly selected and were found to be positive. We were not aware of the previous results. For confirmation of our findings, the samples were submitted to a second diagnostic reference laboratory, PDS in Saskatoon, Canada, for detection of Ureaplasma spp. and U. diversum by PCR. They confirmed our positive results. Presence of U. diversum in these lung samples was also confirmed through sequencing of a PCR amplicon of 1037 nucleotides which was obtained using primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and MGSO (5′-TGCACCATCTGTCACTCTGTTAACCT-3′). The PCR amplicon nucleotide sequences, which contain a partial sequence of the 16S rRNA gene, were deposited in the GenBank database (Case 1: strain FMV15-1774804; accession number MH428100) and (Case 2: strain FMV16-1864716; accession number MH428101). Nucleotide sequences obtained from both swine lungs showed 99% identity with U. diversum reference strain A417, as determined using the NCBI nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).
Ureaplasma diversum was first reported in pneumonic lungs of swine in Cuba in 2014 (18). A phylogenetic analysis by Burgher et al (18) in 2014 demonstrated the genetic relatedness of the porcine Cuban ureaplasma strains with U. diversum species. A phylogenetic analysis was carried out to confirm the phylogenetic relatedness of our porcine ureaplasma strains with U. diversum, and particularly, to determine the genetic relatedness of the Canadian porcine ureaplasma strains with the Cuban porcine Ureaplasma strains. The partial sequences of the 16S rRNA of the Cuban and Canadian porcine Ureaplasma strains as well as of the following Ureaplasma species were included in this analysis: U. urealyticum, U. parvum, U. cati, U. felinum, U. gallorale, U. canigenitalium, and U. diversum. The nucleotide phylogenetic tree confirmed that the Canadian porcine ureaplasma strains were grouped within the U. diversum cluster. Interestingly, these porcine ureaplasma strains formed a sub-cluster with the Cuban porcine ureaplasma strains within the U. diversum cluster. The sequences of the porcine sub-cluster were 99% identical to the bovine U. diversum strains (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Molecular phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA partial nucleotide sequences of species of the genus Ureaplasma. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the Maximum Likelihood method in the MEGA 7 package (24). The tree was scaled with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site (bar, 0.05 substitutions per site). The bootstrap values presented at corresponding branches were evaluated from 1000 replications. The tree is rooted using the sequence of the strain M. hyopneumoniae J. FMV15-1774804 (GenBank accession number: MH428100) and FMV16-1864716 (GenBank accession number: MH428101) are the 16S rRNA partial nucleotide sequences from the porcine U. diversum strains identified in this study (▲). All sequences of porcine origin are highlighted in bold. Herein the GenBank accession numbers of the ureaplasma strains included into the nucleotide phylogenetic tree: NR 025878 (U. diversum A417); CP009770 (U. diversum ATCC 49782); JN935894 (U. diversum T95); U06096 (U. urealyticum ser 2); AF073447 (U. urealyticum ser 4); AF073448 (U. urealyticum ser 5); AF073449 (U. urealyticum ser 7); AF073450 (U. urealyticum ser 8 ATCC 27618); AF073451 (U. urealyticum ser 9); CP001184 (U. urealyticum ser 10 ATCC 33699); AF073453 (U. urealyticum ser 11); AF073454 (U. urealyticum ser 12); AF073455 (U. urealyticum ser 13); AF073458 (U. parvum ser 1); CP000942 (U. parvum ser 3 ATCC 27815); AF073459 (U. parvum ser 6); AF073457 (U. parvum ser 14); NR 026027 (U. gallorale strain D6 -1); HM135464 (U. felinum ATCC 49229); HM241738 (U. cati ATCC 49228); NR 025877 (U. canigenitalium D6P C); KC686352 (U Cuba 36 2009); KC686353 (U Cuba 32 2009); KC686354 (U Cuba 23 2009); KC686355 (U Cuba 135 2012) and AE017243 (Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae J).
Discussion
The pathogenic potential of U. diversum identified in swine remains unknown. However, a previous study conducted in Cuba reported a prevalence of U. diversum of 6.6% (7 of 106 porcine respiratory tract samples) (18). Moreover, all U. diversum positive samples reported in this previous study, were collected from pneumonic swine lungs. Ureaplasma diversum was not detected in any sample from the lungs of 13 healthy swine included in this study (18). Prevalence of U. diversum in the Canadian swine population is unknown. Therefore, 114 additional pig samples (76 lung, 36 pools of tissues, and 2 trachea) were selected randomly and subsequently tested by qPCR for U. diversum. Those samples, most of which originated from different swine facilities, were submitted to MDL to conduct several molecular diagnostic assays including porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) qPCR. Only 1 additional lung sample was found U. diversum positive, suggesting that the prevalence of U. diversum in lungs from pigs may be relatively low (i.e., 3/78 = 3.85%) (Table 2). However, a better experimental design is required to establish the prevalence of U. diversum in the Canadian swine population.
Table 2.
Prevalence of U. diversum qPCR positive porcine samples.
U. diversum | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Type of sample | Number of samples tested | Number of samples positive | % of samples positive |
Lung | 78 | 3a | 3.85% |
Trachea | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Pool of tissuesb | 36 | 0 | 0% |
Total | 116 | 3 | 2.59% |
Includes the 2 U. diversum positive cases described in the manuscript (i.e., FMV15-1774804 and FMV16-1864716).
No description of the type of tissues within the pools was provided by the veterinarians who submitted the samples to MDL.
Respiratory disease in swine generally has a multifactorial origin. The combination of primary and opportunistic infectious agents is a common finding during respiratory disease outbreaks in pig farms (19). The U. diversum positive porcine lung samples were also positive for Mycoplasma spp. (Table 1). Based on bioinformatic analyses, our Mycoplasma spp. PCR diagnostic assay may detect several species of mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas including U. diversum. Therefore, both U. diversum positive lung samples may also be co-infected by other mycoplasma and ureaplasma species. In fact, the lungs of the second case were positive for M. hyopneumoniae, M. hyorhinis in addition to PRRSV (Table 1). Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and PRRSV are common primary infectious agents found in the respiratory tracts of swine. This is particularly the case with M. hyopneumoniae, which is the primary pathogen associated with enzootic pneumonia. It colonizes the respiratory tract of pigs by adhering to the cilia, leading to reduced function of the mucociliary apparatus (20). This allows the respiratory tract of pigs to be colonized by secondary bacterial pathogens. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus is one of the most economically important pathogens of swine, responsible for both reproductive and respiratory diseases. It is the most common virus isolated from cases of Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex (PRDC) (21). Some studies demonstrated that M. hyopneumoniae enhances the severity and duration of PRRSV-induced pneumonia (22). There is also evidence of the association of PRRSV with outbreaks caused by other pathogens (21). It is believed that in addition to the pathogens known to induce respiratory disease, several emerging pathogens could play a role in the development of PRDC (21). Therefore, further studies will be necessary to determine whether U. diversum could be an opportunistic pathogen or a primary agent involved in PRDC.
To our knowledge, this is the first report of U. diversum in the respiratory tract of swine in Canada. However, the present study has the limitation that the classification and phylogeny of the porcine U. diversum was only based on the 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence. There are several examples in which different species of the family Mycoplasmataceae, including Ureaplasma species, share 99% sequence identities based on 16S rRNA sequence analyses (23). This latest data support the need to confirm the phylogenetic results by others means. In that regard, high throughput sequencing analyses are being conducted to obtain the complete genome sequence of the porcine U. diversum strains.
Ureaplasma diversum is a well-recognized bovine pathogen that can cause various clinical signs in infected cattle. For this reason, we believe that it is important to inform the Canadian swine industry stakeholders of its existence in the respiratory tract of swine.
Acknowledgment
We thank Dr. Musangu Ngeleka, Prairie Diagnostic Services, University of Saskatchewan, for the confirmation of the porcine U. diversum positive samples.
Footnotes
Use of this article is limited to a single copy for personal study. Anyone interested in obtaining reprints should contact the CVMA office (hbroughton@cvma-acmv.org) for additional copies or permission to use this material elsewhere.
This work was funded by the Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ). Carl A. Gagnon was financially supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) discovery grant.
References
- 1.Xiao L, Glass JI, Paralanov V, et al. Detection and characterization of human Ureaplasma species and serovars by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2715–2723. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01877-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ruhnke HL, Palmer NC, Doig PA, Miller RB. Bovine abortion and neonatal death associated with Ureaplasma diversum. Theriogenology. 1984;21:295–301. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(84)90415-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gaeti JG, Lana MV, Silva GS, et al. Ureaplasma diversum as a cause of pustular vulvovaginitis in bovine females in Vale Guapore, Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2014;46:1059–1063. doi: 10.1007/s11250-014-0614-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gambarini ML, Kunz TL, Oliveira Filho BD, et al. Granular vulvovaginitis syndrome in nelore pubertal and post pubertal replacement heifers under tropical conditions: Role of Mycoplasma spp., Ureaplasma diversum and BHV-1. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009;41:1421–1426. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9330-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Himsworth CG, Hill JE, Huang Y, Waters EH, Wobeser GA. Destructive polyarthropathy in aborted bovine fetuses: A possible association with Ureaplasma diversum infection? Vet Pathol. 2009;46:269–272. doi: 10.1354/vp.46-2-269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Azevedo JB, Silva GS, Rocha PS, et al. Presence of Ureaplasma diversum in the genital tracts of female dairy cattle in Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017;49:311–316. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1194-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nascimento-Rocha JM, Oliveira BDF, Arnhold E, Porto RNG, Lima SF, Gambarini ML. Assessment of cow and farm level risk factors associated with Ureaplasma diversum in pasture-based dairy systems — A field study. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017;89:1779–1783. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720160813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Le Grand D, Poumarat F, Martel JL. Genital Ureaplasma diversum infection: Investigations in cattle in France. Vet Res. 1995;26:11–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mulira GL, Saunders JR, Barth AD. Isolation of Ureaplasma diversum and mycoplasmas from genital tracts of beef and dairy cattle in Saskatchewan. Can Vet J. 1992;33:46–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ruhnke H, Doig P, MacKay A, Gagnon A, Kierstead M. Isolation of Ureaplasma from bovine granular vulvitis. Can J Comp Med. 1978;42:151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Leon BA, Campos E, Bolanos H, Caballero M. Risk factors for Ureaplasma diversum infections in cattle of a tropical environment. Rev Biol Trop. 1995;43:21–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sosa C, Tirante L, Chaves J, et al. Identification of species of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma diversum from Argentinian dairy herds. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2018;50:31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2017.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Argue B, Chousalkar KK, Chenoweth PJ. Presence of Ureaplasma diversum in the Australian cattle population. Aust Vet J. 2013;91:99–101. doi: 10.1111/avj.12009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kreplin CM, Maitland VF. Alberta abortion due to Ureaplasma diversum. Can Vet J. 1989;30:435. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bergeron L. Bilan Réseau Bovin 2016. Ministère de l’agriculture des pêcheries et de l’alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ); Gouvernement du Québec; 2016. [Last accessed October 18, 2018]. Available from: https://www.mapaq.gouv.qc.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/Santeanimale/Reseaubovins/BilanBovin_2016.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vasconcellos Cardoso M, Blanchard A, Ferris S, Verlengia R, Timenetsky J, Florio Da Cunha RA. Detection of Ureaplasma diversum in cattle using a newly developed PCR-based detection assay. Vet Microbiol. 2000;72:241–250. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00203-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marques LM, Amorim AT, Martins HB, et al. A quantitative TaqMan PCR assay for the detection of Ureaplasma diversum. Vet Microbiol. 2013;167:670–674. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Burgher Y, Miranda L, Rodriguez-Roche R, et al. Ureaplasma diversum in pneumonic lungs of swine. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:486–488. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Opriessnig T, Gimenez-Lirola LG, Halbur PG. Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011;12:133–148. doi: 10.1017/S1466252311000120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.DeBey MC, Ross RF. Ciliostasis and loss of cilia induced by Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in porcine tracheal organ cultures. Infect Immun. 1994;62:5312–5318. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.12.5312-5318.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brockmeier SL, Halbur PG, Thacker EL. Porcine respiratory disease complex. In: Brogden KA, Guthmiller JM, editors. Polymicrobial Diseases. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thacker EL, Halbur PG, Ross RF, Thanawongnuwech R, Thacker BJ. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae potentiation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus-induced pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:620–627. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.3.620-627.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Volokhov DV, Simonyan V, Davidson MK, Chizhikov VE. RNA polymerase beta subunit (rpoB) gene and the 16S–23S rRNA intergenic transcribed spacer region (ITS) as complementary molecular markers in addition to the 16S rRNA gene for phylogenetic analysis and identification of the species of the family Mycoplasmataceae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;62:515–528. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]