Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2018 Nov 15;13(11):e0206030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206030

Demographic analysis of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid exposed predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Somayyeh Ghasemzadeh 1,¤,*, Jawwad A Qureshi 2,*
Editor: Nicolas Desneux3
PMCID: PMC6237301  PMID: 30439960

Abstract

Knowledge of the impact of pesticides on predators is crucial for developing integrated pest management (IPM) programs. Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is a predatory mite used to control several species of pest including Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and arthropods. T. urticae is a major pest of multiple greenhouse-grown and field crops including apples in Iran. Lethal and sublethal effects of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid were investigated on A. swirskii, using these chemicals separately at recommended rates or in combination at reduced rates. Recommended tested rates of both pesticides negatively influenced the biological parameters of A. swirskii such as the net reproductive rate (R0) and the intrinsic rate of increase (r). However, the combined treatment of the two pesticides at their reduced rates was less hazardous to A. swirskii. Our findings indicate that the combined use of these chemicals may be compatible with IPM programs utilizing A. swirskii as biological control tool against phytophagous mites and other pests. However, semifield and field studies to investigate the effects of reduced rate treatments of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid alone and in combination on T. urticae and A. swirskii are required for developing IPM programs.

Introduction

The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), is a widespread, destructive and polyphagous pest of agricultural crops and ornamental plants worldwide [13]. Sever infestations could negatively influence quality and quantity of the fruit and more so for fresh production [4,5]. Predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae are effective natural enemies of spider mites [6,7,8]. Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is a key predator of several major pests of agricultural crops and it is commercially available as a biological control agent. This species can develop and reproduce on a wide range of pests, including mites, thrips, whiteflies and moth eggs, as well as on various kinds of pollen [915].

Biological control and selective insecticides are important for developing an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program and sustainable production system [1618]. Use of biological control agents with selective pesticides could be an effective strategy to control pests and reduce the use of negative effects of synthetic pesticides. However, the use of conventional insecticides is common in several agro-ecosystems [19]. The sole reliance on synthetic pesticides could induce pest resistance, increase production cost and negatively impact environment, ecological services and human health [2023]. Exposure to lethal or sublethal concentrations of pesticides may impact behavior, developmental rate, longevity, fecundity and sex ratio of the target pest species but also of non-target species, either harmful or beneficial [2429]. Application of demographic analysis at the population level takes into account all the aforementioned effects that a toxicant might have on the target species [30,31,32]. This approach considers both lethal and sublethal effects and incorporate them into one endpoint, the intrinsic rate of natural increase [31,33,34], which is useful in detecting subtle, individual-level effects of contaminants that alter the growth of populations even at rates below the lethal concentration [35]. Few studies have been conducted to evaluate population growth rates of insect natural enemies in response to chemicals [3640]. Therefore, knowledge of the toxicity of pesticides to beneficial organisms is important for effective pest management [29, 41].

Fenpyroximate and thiacloprid are widely used as acaricide and insecticide against many mites and insect pests of agricultural crops and ornamentals. The negative effects of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid on other beneficial mites and insects were reported [42,43,44]. However, evaluations against A. swirskii are limited. Only fenpyroximate was tested and fresh residues caused increased mortality of adults and larvae and decreased fecundity at high concentration [45].

Bearing this context in mind, we investigate lethal and sublethal effects of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid in independent treatments at the recommended rates, as well as in a combination at reduced rates, calculated with the non-linear programing on A. swirskii [46]. The non-linear programing is an analytical approach which helps identify and optimize limited production resources, under restricting conditions to obtain the most feasible benefit [47]. The knowledge of the effects of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid on A. swirskii could be useful to IPM programs against T. urticae [29].

Materials and methods

Rearing of mites

The colony of T. urticae mites was initiated from individuals collected from apple orchards of Urmia (West Azerbaijan province of Iran, in August and September 2015) and reared on bean plants (Phaseoulus vulgaris L. var. Talash) (Fabales: Fabaceae). No specific written permissions were required for field collections of mites because the owner had given us verbal permission to work in his orchard and make the collections. No permit or specific permission was required, because this study did not involve endangered or protected species. Amblyseius swirskii was provided by Koppert Biological Systems (Berkel en Rodenrijs, The Netherlands) and was reared on T. urticae on leaf disks of bean plants. The leaves were placed upside down on a wet sponge with a layer of cotton on the top in plastic trays with water (23×13 cm) and held in a climatic chamber at 25±1°C, 70±5% RH and a photoperiod of 16:8 (L:D) h. All experiments were conducted under these laboratory conditions.

Pesticides

Fenpyroximate, commercial formulation Ortus 5% suspension concentrate, was provided by AGROXIR, Iran. Foliar sprays of fenpyroximate are used to control both immature and adult stages of mites [48]. Fenpyroximate is a mitochondrial electron transport inhibitor (METI) and affects target species by contact and ingestion. This pesticide is registered for the control of the European red mite, Panonychus ulmi Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), and the two-spotted mite (T. urticae) on pome fruits, citrus, grapes and hops in several countries. Thiacloprid, commercial formulation Calypso 48% suspension concentrate, was provided by Bayer Crop Science, Germany. This chemical disrupts the nervous system of the target organism by inhibiting nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Thiacloprid is used in the agricultural crops such as cotton and pome fruits to control a variety of sucking insects. Aphids and whiteflies are the primary target in cotton and psyllid, codling moth and plum Curculio in pome fruits [49].

Lethal effect on adults

The acute toxicity and LC50 determinations were made on adult mites. In contact bioassay tests, commercial formulation of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid was applied at concentration of 0, 6, 11, 18, 30 and 50 mg a.i. liter-1 and 0, 6, 9, 13, 20 and 30 mg a.i. liter-1, respectively. Each concentration was replicated five times, with 10 individuals per replicate. Required solutions were prepared in distilled water. The concentrations of the pesticides were chosen based on the maximum field recommended concentration (MFRC) of these commercial compounds in Iran. The bean leaf discs (Ø 2.5 cm) were dipped in the tested pesticides’ solution for 10 s and allowed to dry for about three h under laboratory condition. The control leaf discs were dipped in distilled water. Mortality was recorded after 24 h of exposure. Mites were considered dead if they did not move when prodded with a soft paint brush.

Sublethal effects on the progeny

The sublethal effects of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid were evaluated on the fecundity, survival and development of the progeny of the treated A. swirskii. The concentrations of the pesticides were prepared based on the MFRC in Iran. Fenpyroximate and thiacloprid in the independent treatments were used at 50 mg a.i. liter-1 and 30 mg a.i. liter-1, respectively, and in combination treatment at reduced rates of 17.2 mg a.i. liter-1 and 0.8 mg a.i. liter-1, respectively. These rates were determined using the non-linear programming framework for bean plants to estimate the optimum rates of two pesticides in the mixture to cause mortality of more than 50% to T. urticae and less than 50% to A. swirskii [46].

Mites were tested on freshly-excised bean leaf discs treated and control placed upside down in 30-ml transparent plastic cups containing water agar mixture (10%). The bean leaf discs were dipped for 10 s in the solution of each treatment (fenpyroximate, thiacloprid, fenpyroximate + thiacloprid combined at reduced rates) and in distilled water for control and allowed to dry for 3 h [50]. Cohort of fifty 24-h old females of A. swirskii from untreated bean plants was placed on leaf discs of each treatment and control. After 24 h, forty surviving females from each treatment and control were moved to untreated bean leaf discs at one per disc. Forty females were selected due to mortality of few individuals in some treatments and to use equal numbers across treatments. After 24 h, the eggs laid by each female from each of the experimental arena were placed in new arena at one egg per disc per female. The cohort of 0–24 h old eggs from each female was monitored through the development of nymphs and adults. Developing nymphs were provided with an abundant supply of T. urticae as prey. Ten adults of T. urticae were more than enough for the predator. The daily maximum food intake of one predatory mite was four adult spider mites [SG, personal observations]. Experimental arenas were checked daily to record survival and developmental time of the different life stages. The leaves were replaced every three days if it was necessary. Each newly emerged female from the four treatments (15–23 in each treatment) were coupled with an untreated male for mating under the conditions described above. Survival and fecundity was recorded until the death of the last individual.

Statistical analysis

Mortality curves were estimated by probit analysis [51]. Raw data on the survival, longevity, and daily fecundity of individual females were analyzed using a life-stage specific and TWOSEX life table using both sexes in computer program MSChart [5254]. The means and standard errors of the population parameters were estimated by a Bootstrapping procedure with 10,000 replicates [5557]. The bootstrap method generates a normal distribution. Bootstrapping uses random resampling, otherwise a small number of replicates will generate variable means and large standard errors. Some data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at P = 0.05. Differences between means were compared with the Tukey-Kramer (P = 0.05) procedure [58].

Following Chi and Liu [52], the age-stage specific survival rate (sxj), where x is age and j is the stage; the age-specific survival rate (lx); the age-specific fecundity (mx); the net reproductive rate (R0); the intrinsic rate of increase (r); the finite rate of increase (λ); the mean generation time (T) and the doubling time (DT) were calculated as follows:

lx=j=1βsxj
mx=j=1βsxjfxjj=1βsxj

Where β is the number of stages and fxj is age-stage specific fecundity (where x = age and j = stage)

R0=x=0lxmx
x=0e-r(x+1)lxmx=1
λ=er
T=lnR0r
DT=ln2r

Results

Lethal effect on adults

The median lethal concentration (LC50) values for A. swirskii adults exposed to fenpyroximate and thiacloprid, were 16.67 mg a.i. liter-1 and 35.21 mg a.i. liter-1, respectively (Table 1). Mortality was significant in fenpyroximate (F = 104.66; df = 4, 20; P < 0.0001) and thiacloprid (F = 46.04; df = 4, 20; P < 0.0001) treatments averaging 89% and 47% after 24 h exposure at highest concentrations, respectively (Fig 1). No mortality was recorded in the control group.

Table 1. Median lethal concentration (LC50) estimated using probit analysis for adult female Amblyseius swirskii exposed to fenpyroximate and thiacloprid for 24 h.

Pesticide 95% Confidence limits χ2 Df LC(50) Slope ± SE
Fenpyroximate 14.69–18.89 1.77 3 16.67 2.25 ± 0.20
Thiacloprid 27.49–53.58 0.36 3 35.212 1.70 ± 0.26

Fig 1. Mean (± SE) number of Amblyseius swirskii adults killed by residual concentrations of 6, 11, 18, 30 and 50 mg a.i. liter-1 for fenpyroximate and 6, 9, 13, 20 and 30 mg a.i. liter-1 for thiacloprid.

Fig 1

A one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s mean separation test (P = 0.05) was performed to compare adult mortality among concentrations. Letters beside data points represent differences among concentrations of each pesticide.

Sublethal effects on the progeny

Overall biological parameters of the developing female and male progeny of females exposed to sublethal concentrations of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid were significantly affected compared with the control (Table 2). Duration of egg and larval stage of female and male from fenpyroximate alone treatment was significantly prolonged compared to those from control and treatments of thiacloprid alone and combination (P < 0.0001). However, there was no difference between treatments of fenpyroximate alone and thiacloprid alone for egg stage of female. Thiacloprid alone also prolonged the egg duration of female compared to control. Development time of each sex was significantly prolonged by each of the three treatments compared with control except combination against control for male (P < 0.0001). Female and male progeny of the females treated with fenpyroximate alone took significantly longer time to develop followed by those in thiacloprid alone, combination and control. Longevity of both sexes compared with control was significantly reduced in the treatment of fenpyroximate alone followed by thiacloprid alone and combination (P < 0.0001).

Table 2. Mean (±SE) developmental time, longevity and total life span (days) of offspring from females of Amblyseius swirskii from control or treatments of recommended rates of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid alone or in combination at reduced rates.

Sex/stage Treatments
Fenpyroximate Thiacloprid Fenpyroximate+ Thiacloprid Control F (df,n)* P
Female
Egg duration 2.20 ± 0.13a 2.08 ± 0.15a 1.71 ± 0.13b 1.50 ± 0.14b 225.70 <0.0001
Larva duration 1.80 ± 0.25a 1.25 ± 0.13b 1.14 ± 0.10b 1.00 ± 0.00c 174.20 <0.0001
Protonymph 2.10 ± 0.18a 1.75 ± 0.13b 2.00 ± 0.15ab 2.00 ± 0.15ab 27.90 <0.0001
Deutonymph 2.10 ± 0.10a 2.00 ± 0.12a 2.14 ± 0.10a 2.00 ± 0.15a 7.20 0.0003
Developmental time 8.20 ± 0.29a 7.08 ± 0.19b 7.00 ± 0.23b 6.50 ± 0.23c 256.50 <0.0001
Longevity 15.80 ± 0.39d 20.67 ± 0.31c 21.64 ± 0.37b 23.50 ± 0.29a 2633.00 <0.0001
Total life span 24.00 ± 0.47d 27.75 ± 0.37c 28.64 ± 0.34b 30.00 ± 0.23a 1179.00 <0.0001
Male
Egg duration 2.25 ± 0.16a 1.89 ± 0.11b 1.70 ± 0.15b 1.60 ± 0.16b 83.90 <0.0001
Larva duration 2.00 ± 0.27a 1.33 ± 0.17b 1.20 ± 0.13b 1.30 ± 0.15b 50.00 <0.0001
Protonymph 2.00 ± 0.27ab 1.78 ± 0.15b 2.00 ± 0.00a 2.00 ± 0.00a 27.00 <0.0001
Deutonymph 2.12 ± 0.12a 2.00 ± 0.00a 2.00 ± 0.15a 1.60 ± 0.22b 6.14 <0.0011
Developmental time 8.38 ± 0.32a 7.00 ± 0.00b 6.90 ± 0.28bc 6.50 ± 0.40c 157.40 <0.0001
Longevity 12.50 ± 0.33d 19.33 ± 0.29c 20.90 ± 0.55b 22.50 ± 0.54a 2111.00 <0.0001
Total life span 20.88 ± 0.35d 26.33 ± 0.29c 27.80 ± 0.39b 29.00 ± 0.33a 2685.00 <0.0001

Means followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Tukey-Kramer, P = 0.05)

*F: female (3,75), male (3,56)

Treatment of thiacloprid alone resulted in significantly prolonged pre-oviposition time compared with control (P < 0.0001, Table 3). Oviposition time was significantly reduced compared with control in all three treatments most with fenpyroximate alone followed by thiacloprid alone and combination (P < 0.0001, Table 3). Similar effect was observed for post-oviposition period and fecundity (P < 0.0001).

Table 3. Mean (±SE) reproductive period and total fecundity of offspring from females of Amblyseius swirskii from control or treatments of recommended rates of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid alone or in combination at reduced rates.

Parameters Treatments
Fenpyroximate Thiacloprid Fenpyroximate+ Thiacloprid Control F (df,n)* P
Pre-oviposition (day) 3.30 ± 0.15ab 3.50 ± 0.15a 3.21 ± 0.11b 3.14 ± 0.10b 381.05 <0.0001
Oviposition (day) 6.70 ± 0.26d 10.25 ± 0.25c 11.94 ± 0.30b 13.86 ± 0.25a 2199.64 <0.0001
Post-oviposition (day) 3.70 ± 0.14d 4.77 ± 0.12c 5.44 ± 0.13b 6.37 ± 0.12a 459.05 <0.0001
Total fecundity
(no. eggs)
6.70 ± 0.25d 10.42 ± 0.30c 12.36 ± 0.35b 14.79 ± 0.40a 1562.25 <0.0001

Means followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Tukey-Kramer, P = 0.05)

*F (3,75)

Data on the age-specific survival rate (lx) and age-specific fecundity in all treatments are provided in Figs 2 and 3. Total life span averaged 30 days for the untreated females and 24 days, 27.75 days and 28.64 days for the females treated with fenpyroximate alone, thiacloprid alone and the combination at reduced rates, respectively. There was 2.5% mortality in the immature stages in the combination treatment, with 97.5% chance of reaching adulthood compared with control. In contrast, the mites treated with recommended concentrations of two pesticides showed highest mortality in immature stages, with 85 and 92.5% chances of reaching adulthood for fenpyroximate and thiacloprid, respectively.

Fig 2. Age-specific survival (lx) of the population of Amblyseius swirskii females from control or treatments of recommended rates of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid alone or in combination at reduced rates.

Fig 2

lx represents the probability that an egg will survive to age x, and the curve of the age-specific survival rate is a simplified form of the curves of age-stage survival rate, regardless of developmental stage.

Fig 3. Age-specific fecundity (mx) of the population from Amblyseius swirskii females from control or treatments of recommended rates of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid alone or in combination at reduced rates.

Fig 3

A maximum mx of 0.84 eggs/female/day was observed on day 11–13 of the untreated mites. For fenpyroximate alone, thiacloprid alone and combination treatment mx was approximately 0.55, 0.65 and 0.76 eggs/female/day, respectively, at 15, 14 and 14 day of the life span, respectively (Fig 3). Compared to the control, the fenpyroximate and thiacloprid treatments increased the duration of both egg and larval stages, and the pre-oviposition period. Male adults emerged earlier than females. The highest female survival rate was observed in the combination treatment and on average 56% of the eggs developed to the adult stage (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Age-stage specific survival rate (sxj) of the population from Amblyseius swirskii females from control or treatments of recommended rates of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid alone or in combination at reduced rates.

Fig 4

There was significant negative effect of the recommended rates of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid applied alone on the population parameters including intrinsic rate of increase (r), the finite rate of increase (λ), the net reproductive rate (R0), the gross reproductive rates (GRR), the mean generation time (T) and the doubling time (DT) (P < 0.0001, Table 4). However the effect of the combination treatment containing reduced rates of both pesticides compared to control were not statistically significant except for increase in DT.

Table 4. Mean (±SE) population parameters of the females of Amblyseius swirskii from control or treatments of recommended rates of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid alone or in combination at reduced rates.

Population parameters Treatments
Fenpyroximate Thiacloprid Fenpyroximate+ Thiacloprid Control F (df,n)* P
Intrinsic rate of increase, r (day-1) 0.06 ± 0.016c 0.09 ± 0.01b 0.12 ± 0.01ab 0.13 ± 0.01a 266.77 <0.0001
Finite rate of increase, λ (day-1) 1.06 ± 0.017c 1.10 ± 0.01b 1.13 ± 0.01ab 1.14 ± 0.01a 267.26 <0.0001
Net reproductive rate, R0 (offspring) 2.68 ± 0.66c 5.00 ± 1.04b 6.92 ± 1.24ab 8.28 ± 1.48a 233.27 <0.0001
Gross reproductive rate, GRR (offspring) 3.83 ± 0.79c 5.95 ± 1.14b 7.22 ± 1.26ab 8.62 ± 1.50a 112.67 <0.0001
Mean generation time, T (day) 16.31 ± 0.60a 16.16 ± 0.29a 16.11 ± 0.29ab 15.95 ± 0.26b 86.66 <0.0001
Doubling time, DT (day) 11.46 ± 0.15a 6.96 ± 0.26b 5.77 ± 0.21c 5.23 ± 0.25d 146.54 <0.0001

Means followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Tukey-Kramer, P = 0.05)

* F (3,156)

Discussion

Determination of the compatibility of pesticides with natural enemies of plant pests is crucial for developing effective IPM strategies [24,59,60]. Assessment of the toxic effects of pesticides on natural enemies by measuring mortality rate alone underestimate the residual effects of the pesticides [61,62,63]. Knowledge of the population level effects of the pesticides on beneficial organisms is needed for developing integrated and sustainable pest management programs. Fenpyroximate and thiacloprid and several others pesticides are often used in combination and therefore selection of proper treatments is important [24,64]. Our study is the first evaluation of the effects of recommended field rate of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid applied alone and combination of the reduced rates of both pesticides on the demographic parameters of A. swirskii. The recommended rates prolonged egg and larval development of A. swirskii and reduced total life span. The combination treatment also reduced total life span. These effects may result in a reduced population growth of this predator as observed with reduced net reproductive rate and intrinsic rate of increase particularly at recommended rates, which could be significant to reduce biocontrol of pest mites. Overall, fenpyroximate had the strongest negative effect on A. swirskii followed by thiacloprid, whereas effects were strongly reduced or absent in the combination treatment of the two pesticides at reduced rates. Similar effects were observed on the eggs and larval development of A. swirskii when exposed to LC30 concentrations of fenazaquin, another insecticide with a mode of action similar to fenpyroximate [27]. The low-concentration strategy when effective against pests and compatible with biological control agents could be useful within an IPM program and to reduce selection pressure and the development of resistance [28,65]. There were no adverse effects of sublethal concentrations of spirodiclofen on developmental time, longevity and total life span of both sexes of A. swirskii [66]. Differences in phytoseiid species, populations, experimental method, pesticide mode of action, formulations and concentrations could be responsible for different results between studies. Fenpyroximate and fenazaquin functions as METI, thiacloprid acts on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) [67,68,69] and spirodiclofen inhibits the acetyl-CoA carboxylase [70].

Reproductive variables of A. swirskii in all treatments except pre-oviposition period in the fenpyroximate treatment at recommended rate and combination treatment were reduced compared to the control. A negative impact of these and some other pesticides used at different rates on predatory mites including A. swirskii was also observed by other researchers. Lopez et al. [45] tested low lethal and sublethal concentrations of the proposed average field rate in bell peppers against A. swirskii under laboratory conditions and found that survival increased and fecundity decreased with the increase in concentration. Fecundity of Phytoseius plumifer Canestrini and Fanzago (Acari: Phytoseiidae) also decreased substantially with the increasing sublethal concentrations of fenpyroximate [71]. However, sublethal concentrations of spirodiclofen had no significant effects on the oviposition period and fecundity of A. swirskii [66]. Fecundity of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henroit (Acari: Phytoseiidae) was reduced when treated with sublethal concentrations of fenpyroximate [72]. Sublethal effects of fenpyroximate on P. plumifer and of fenazaquin on A. swirskii were also reported [27,71]. However, mortality of Neoseiulus cucumeris Oudemans (Acari: Phytoseiidae), Typhlodromips montdorensis Schicha (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and A. swirskii from direct applications and dry residues of thiacloprid and pymetrozine was similar to the control [73].

The age specific survival and fecundity of A. swirskii were reduced in the full rate treatments of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid but not much in the combination treatment at reduced rates. Exposure of P. plumifer to fenpyroximate and abamectin at the highest recommended field concentration produced similar effects [74]. Fecundity of acequinocyl exposed Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae), was also reduced [75], however, fecundity and some other demographic parameters of A. swirskii exposed to spirodiclofen were not influenced suggesting that sublethal concentrations may not affect the population parameters of offspring from treated A. swirskii [66]. Due to the variability in the developmental rate among individuals, the survival curve of predatory mites treated with pesticides showed significant stage over-lapping in our study and others [26,27,66]. Some of the discrepancies in findings between studies could be due to use of different pesticide and the mite response to those.

Our results revealed significant differences in population growth and reproductive rates between the treated and untreated females of A. swirskii. The population parameters including the intrinsic rate of increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ), net reproductive rate (R0) and gross reproductive rate (GRR) of the A. swirskii were reduced in the full rate treatments of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid compared with the mites in control but not in the combination treatment. A noticeable reduction of these population parameters was observed with fenpyroximate than thiacloprid. Similar effects of these and some other pesticides against A. swirskii and other species were also observed by other researchers. For example, adverse impacts of chlorantraniliprole, cyantraniliprole and lambda-cyhalothrin on the rm of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Trioxys pallidus (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) [76]; and of lethal concentrations of spiromesifen and spirodiclofen on the rm of Neoseiulus californicus McGregor (Acari: Phytoseiidae) [28]. However, frequent sprays of hexythiazox had no significant effect on rm of P. persimilis for several generations [77]. Hamedi et al. [71] demonstrated that P. plumifer treated with LC10, LC20 and LC30 concentrations of fenpyroximate had significantly reduced λ than the untreated mites also observed in similar studies against N. californicus [78]. Our findings of reduced R0 and GRR of A. swirskii in the treatments of full rates were similar to other reports indicating that the lethal and sublethal concentration of acaricides significantly reduced the R0 of phytoseiids [26,27,28,79]. The full treatments of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid prolonged the mean generation time (T) of A. swirskii compared with control but not when combined at the reduced rates. Similar effect on A. swirskii was seen with the sublethal concentration of fenazaquin [27]. Noticeably prolonged doubling time (DT) of A. swirskii was observed from exposure to full rate treatments of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid than combination treatment of their reduced rates.

Fenpyroximate and thiacloprid at recommended rates compared to the control negatively influenced the biological parameters of A. swirskii. The combination of the reduced rates of both pesticides was less hazardous to A. swirskii and may be useful within an IPM program utilizing A. swirskii for biological control of phytophagous mites and other pests. However, semifield and field studies are needed to investigate the level of compatibility between the concentrations of fenpyroximate and thiacloprid and A. swirskii and to assess their efficiency in controlling T. urticae.

Data Availability

All relevant data are provided in the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Urmia Unversity and the funder had no role in the design of the study, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Nauen R, Stumpf N, Elbert A, Zebitz CPW, Kraus W. Acaricide toxicity and resistance in larvae of different strains of Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Pest Manage Sci. 2001; 57: 253–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sedaratian A, Fathipour Y, Moharramipour S. Comparative life table analysis of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on 14 soybean genotypes. Insect Sci. 2011; 18: 541–553. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Migeon A, Dorkeld F. Spider mites web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae. 2014. http://www.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb
  • 4.Fasulo TR, Denmark HA. Two spotted Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Arachnida: Acari: Tetranychidae). 2000. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN30700.pdf
  • 5.Casuso N, Smith H. Two-spotted Spider Mite–Life Cycle. 2017. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN105900.pdf
  • 6.Ganjisaffar F, Fathipour Y, Kamali K. Temperature–dependent development and life table parameters of Typhlodromus bagdasarjani (Phytoseiidae) fed on two spotted spider mite. Exp Appl Acarol. 2011; 55: 259–272. 10.1007/s10493-011-9467-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Messelink GJ, Van Maanen R, Van Holstein-Saj R, Sabelis MW, Janssen A. Pest species diversity enhances control of spider mites and whiteflies by a generalist phytoseiid predator. Biocontrol. 2010; 55: 387–398. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Montserrat M, Pena FDL, Hormaza JI, Gonzalez-Fernandez JJ. How do Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) females penetrate densely webbed spider mite nests? Exp Appl Acarol. 2008; 44: 101–106. 10.1007/s10493-008-9137-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Swirski E, Amitai S, Dorzia N. Laboratory studies on the feeding, development and oviposition of the predacious mite Amblyseius rubini Swirski and Amitai and Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on various kinds of food substances. Israel J Agric Res. 1967; 17: 101–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ghasemzadeh S, Leman A, Messelink GJ. Biological control of Echinothrips americanus by phytoseiid predatory mites and the effect of pollen as supplemental food. Exp Appl Acarol. 2017. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10493-017-0191-1.pdf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Messelink GJ, Van Steenpaal S, Van Wensveen W. Typhlodromips swirskii (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): a new predator for thrips control in greenhouse cucumber. IOBC Bulletin. 2005; 28: 183–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Messelink GJ, Van Maanen R, Van Steenpaal SEF, Janssen A. Biological control of thrips and whiteflies by a shared predator: Two pests are better than one. Biol Control. 2008; 44: 372–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Delisle JF, Shipp L, Brodeur J. Apple pollen as a supplemental food source for the control of western flower thrips by two predatory mites, Amblyseius swirskii and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), on potted chrysanthemum. Exp Appl Acarol. 2015; 65: 495–509. 10.1007/s10493-014-9863-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Messelink GJ, Van Maanen R, Van Holstein-Saj R, Sabelis MW, Janssen A. Pest species diversity enhances control of spider mites and whiteflies by a generalist phytoseiid predator. BioControl. 2010; 55: 387–398. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Messelink GJ, Van Steenpaal EF, Ramakers PMJ. Evaluation of phytoseiid predators for control of western flower thrips on greenhouse cucumber. BioControl. 2006; 51: 753–768. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bueno AF, Bueno RCOF. Integrated pest management as a tool to mitigate the pesticide negative impact into the agroecosystem: the soybean example In: Jokanovic M, editor. The impact of pesticides. Cheyenne: Academy Publish; 2012. pp. 165–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zalucki MP, Adamson D, Furlong MJ. The future of IPM: whither or wither? Aust J Entomol. 2009; 48: 85–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jansen JP. Pest select database: a new tool to use selective pesticides for IPM. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2013; 78: 115–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sarwar M. The Killer Chemicals as Controller of Agriculture Insect Pests: The Conventional Insecticides. Int J Chem Biomol Sci. 2015; 1: 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tegtmeier EM, Duffy MD. External Costs of Agricultural Production in the United States. 2004; 2: 1–20 [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser WW, Emmerson M, Morales MB, et al. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Appl Ecol. 2010; 11: 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mascarelli A. Growing Up with Pesticides. Science. 2013; 341: 740–741. 10.1126/science.341.6147.740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pimentel D, Greiner A. Environmental and socioeconomic costs of pesticide use In: Pimentel D, editor. Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use: Environmental and Economic Benefits. Chichester, UK, John Wiley and Sons; 1997. pp. 51–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Roush R T. Designing resistance management programs: how can you choose? Pestic Sci. 1989. 26:423–441 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nadimi A, Kamali K, Arbabi M, Abdoli F. Study on persistence tests of miticides abamectin and fenpyroximate to the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Afr J Agric Res. 2011; 6: 338–342. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ghaderi S, Minaei K, Kavousi A, Akrami MA, Aleosfoor M, Ghadamyari M. Demographic analysis of the effect of fenpyroximate on Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Entomol Gen. 2013; 34(3): 225–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alinejad M, Kheradmand K, Fathipour Y. Sublethal effects of fenazaquin on life table parameters of the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 2014; 64: 361–373. 10.1007/s10493-014-9830-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sarbaz S, Goldasteh Sh, Zamani AA, Solymannejadiyan E, Vafaei Shoushtari R. Side effects of spiromesifen and spirodiclofen on life table parameters of the predatory mite, Neoseiulus californicus McGregor (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int J Acarol. 2017. Available from: 10.1080/01647954.2017.1325396 28931960 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech JM. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007; 52: 81–106. 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stark JD, Tanigoshi L, Bounfour M, Antonelli A. Reproductive potential: its influence on the susceptibility of a species to pesticides. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 1997; 37: 273–279. 10.1006/eesa.1997.1552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stark JD, Banken JO, Walthal WK. The importance of population perspective for the evaluation of side effects of pesticides on beneficial species In: Haskell PT., McEwen P. (Eds.), Ecotoxicology: pesticides and beneficial organisms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 1998. pp. 348–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stark JD, Banks JE, Acheampong S. Estimating susceptibility of biological control agents to pesticides: Influence of life history strategies and population structure. Biol Control. 2004; 29(3): 392–398. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stark JD, Banks JE. The toxicologists’ and ecologists’ point of view unification through a demographic approach In: Kammenga J., Laskowski R. (Eds.), Demography in Ecotoxicology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York; 2000. pp. 9–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stark JD, Banks JE. Population-level effects of pesticides and other toxicants on arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol. 2003; 48: 505–519. 10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bechmann RK. Use of life tables and LC50 tests to evaluate chronic and acute toxicity effects of copper on the marine copepod Tisbe furcata (Baird). Environ Toxicol Chem. 1994; 13: 1509–1517. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stark JD, Vargas R, Banks JE. Incorporating ecologically relevant measures of pesticide effect for estimating the compatibility of pesticides and biocontrol agents. J Econ Entomol. 2007; 100: 1027–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gontijo PC, Moscardini VF, Michaud JP, Carvalho GA. Non-target effects of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam on Chrysoperla carnea when employed as sunflower seed treatments. J Pest Sci. 2014; 87: 711–719. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gontijo PC, Moscardini VF, Michaud JP, Carvalho GA. Non-target effects of two sunflower seed treatments on Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2015; 71: 515–522. 10.1002/ps.3798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gontijo PC, Abbade Neto DO, Oliveira RL, Michaud JP, Carvalho GA. Non-target impacts of soybean insecticidal seed treatments on the life history and behavior of Podisus nigrispinus, a predator of fall armyworm. 2017; 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moscardini VF, Gontijo PC, Michaud JP, Carvalho GA. Sublethal effects of insecticide seed treatments on two nearctic ladybeetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Ecotoxicology. 2015; 24: 1152–1161. 10.1007/s10646-015-1462-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sandez-De-Cabezon IFJ, Zalom FG. Side effects of five new acaricides on the predator Galendromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 2006; 38: 229–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Saber M. Acute and population level toxicity of imidacloprid and fenpyroximate on an important egg parasitoid, Trichogramma cacoeciae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ecotoxicology. 2011; 20(6): 1476–1484. 10.1007/s10646-011-0704-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim SS, Seo SG, Park JD, Kim SG, Kim DI. Effects of selected pesticides on the predatory mite, Amblyseius cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae). J Entomol Sci. 2005; 40(2) 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao X, Wu Ch, Wang Y, Cang T, Chen L, Yu R, et al. Assessment of toxicity risk of insecticides used in rice ecosystem on Trichogramma japonicum, an egg parasitoid of rice Lepidopterans. J. Econ Entomol. 2012; 105(1): 92–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lopez L, Smith HA, Hoy MA, Bloomquist JR. Acute toxicity and sublethal effects of 364 fenpyroximate to Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae). J. Econ Entomol. 2015; 108: 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ghasemzadeh S, Ghosta Y, Pourmirza AA, Ghadamyari M, Mahdavifar F. Application of non-linear programming in apple orchards pest control. Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2015; 25(2): 503–506. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Han Y, Huang YF, Wang GQ, Maqsood I. A multi-objective linear programming model with interval parameters for water resources allocation in Dalian city. Water Resour Manag. 2011; 25: 449–463. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Acceptance of petition for extension of the exclusive use data protection period for fenpyroximate. 2014. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-12/documents/fenpyroximate-response.pdf
  • 49.United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances. Name of chemical: Thiacloprid. 2003. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/fs_PC-014019_26-Sep-03.pdf
  • 50.Helle W, Overmeer WPJ. Toxicological test methods In: Helle W, Sabelis MW, editors. Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1A Elsevier, Amsterdam; 1985. pp. 391–395. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.SPSS 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  • 52.Chi H, Liu H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull Inst Zool Acad Sin (Taipei). 1985; 24(2): 225–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chi H. Life table analysis incorporating both sex and variable development rate among individuals. Environ Entomol. 1988; 17(1): 26–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chi H. Computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis. National Chung Hsing University, Taiching Taiwan; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Huang YB, Chi H. Life tables of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): with an invalidation of the jackknife technique. J Appl Entomol. 2013; 137: 327–339. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Khanamani M, Fathipour Y, Hajiqanbar H. Population growth response of Tetranychus urticae to eggplant quality: application of female age-specific and age-stage, two-sex life tables. Int J Acarol. 2013; 39: 638–648. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dunnett CW. Pairwise multiple comparisons in the homogeneous variance, unequal sample size case. J Am Stat Assoc. 1980; 75: 789–795. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Biondi A, Desneux N, Siscaro G, Zappala L. Using organic-certified rather than synthetic pesticides may not be safer for biological control agents: Selectivity and side effects of 14 pesticides on the predator Orius laevigatus. Chemosphere. 2012; 87: 803–812. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Desneux N, Denoyelle R, Kaiser L. A multi-step bioassay to assess the effect of the deltamethrin on the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi. Chemosphere. 2006; 65: 1697–1706. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Irigary F, Zalom FG, Thompson PB. Residual toxicity of acaricides to Galendromus occidentalis and Phytoseiulus persimilis reproductive potential. Biol Control. 2007; 40: 153–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Biondi A, Zappala L, Stark JD, Desneux N. Do biopesticides affect the demographic traits of a parasitoid wasp and its biocontrol services through sublethal effects? PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: e76548 10.1371/journal.pone.0076548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Abbes K, Biondi A, Kurtulus A, Ricupero M, Russo A, Siscaro G, et al. Combined non-target effects of insecticide and high temperature on the parasitoid Bracon nigricans. PLOS ON. 2015; 10: e0138411 10.1371/journal.pone.0138411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Curtis CF. Theoretical models of the use of insecticide mixtures for management of resistance. Bull Entomol Res. 1985; 75: 259–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dent D. Insect pest management. CABI Publishing, 2000; Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Alinejad M, Kheradmand K, Fathipour Y. Assessment of sublethal effects of spirodiclofen on biological performance of the predatory mite, Amblyseius swirskii. Sys Appl Acarol. 2016; 21(3): 375–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hirata K, Kawamura Y, Kuno M, Igarasgi H. Development of a new acaricide, pyridaben. J Pestic Sci. 1995; 20: 177–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yamada T, Takahashi H, Hatano R. A novel insecticide, acetamiprid In: Yamamoto I., Casida J.E. (Eds.), Nicotinoid Insecticides and the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor. Springer, Tokyo; 1999. pp. 149–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dekeyser MA. Acaricide mode of action. Pest Manag Sci. 2005; 61: 103–110. 10.1002/ps.994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nauen R. Spirodiclofen: mode of action and resistance risk assessment in tetranychid pest mites. J Pestic Sci. 2005; 30: 272–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hamedi N, Fathipour Y, Saber M. Sublethal effects of fenpyroximate on life table parameters of the predatory mite Phytoseius plumifer. Biol Control. 2010; 55: 271–279. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Park JJ, Kim M, Lee JH, Shin KI, Lee SE, Kim JG, et al. Sublethal effects of fenpyroximate and pyridaben on two predatory mite species, Neoseiulus womersleyi and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 2011; 54: 243–259. 10.1007/s10493-011-9435-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cuthbertson AG, Mathers JJ, Croft P, Nattriss N, Blackburn LF, Luo W, et al. Prey consumption rates and compatibility with pesticides of four predatory mites from the family Phytoseiidae attacking Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Pest Manag Sci. 2012; 68: 1289–1295. 10.1002/ps.3296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Nadimi A, Kamali K, Arbabi M, Abdoli F. Selectivity of three miticides to spider mite predator, Phytoseius plumifer (Acari: Phytoseiidae) under laboratory conditions. Agric Sci China. 2009; 8: 326–331. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Puchalska E, Piotrowska M. Side effects of acequinocyl on predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). CBCS. 2016; 11: 140–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Amarasekare KG, Shearer PW, Mills NJ. Testing the selectivity of pesticide effects on natural enemies in laboratory bioassays. Biol Control. 2015; 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sanatgar E, Shoushtari RV, Zamani AA, Nejadian ES. Effect of frequent application of hexythiazox on predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acad J Entomol. 2011; 4(3): 94–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Maroufpoor M, Ghosta Y, Pourmirza AA, Lotfalizadeh H. The effects of selected acaricides on life table parameters of the predatory mite, Neoseiulus californicus, fed on European red mite. North West J Zool. 2016; 12(1): 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ibrahim YB, Yee TS. Influence of sublethal exposure to abamectin on the biological performance of Neoseiulus longispinosus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). J. Econ Entomol. 2000; 93: 1085–1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are provided in the manuscript.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES