Abstract
The analysis of volatiles released by marine Salinispora bacteria uncovered a new class of natural compounds displaying an unusual bicyclic [3.1.0]-lactone skeleton. Although only sub-μg quantities of the compounds were available, the combination of analytical methods, computational spectroscopy, and synthesis allowed unambiguous structural identification of the compounds, called salinilactones, without the need for isolation. Orthogonal hyphenated methods, GC/MS and solid-phase GC/IR allowed to propose a small set of structures consistent with the data. A candidate structure was selected by comparison of DFT-calculated IR spectra and the experimental IR-spectrum. Synthesis confirmed the structure and absolute configuration of three bicyclic lactones, salinilactones A–C. The salinilactones are structurally closely related to the A-factor class of compounds, autoregulators from streptomycete bacteria. They exhibited inhibitory activity against Salinispora and Streptomyces strains.
Keywords: A-factor, autoinducer, bicyclic lactones, GC/IR, structure elucidation
Marine actinomycete bacteria of the genus Salinispora are known to produce a wide variety of natural products,[1–3] for example, the antimalarial salinipostins[4] or the proteasome inhibitor salinosporamide A.[5,6] Salinispora bacteria also emit an extensive range of volatiles.[7] In an effort to reveal the function of these volatiles, we analyzed liquid cultures of Salinispora arenicola CNQ748 by closed loop stripping analysis (CLSA).[8] These experiments furnished complex samples of volatiles containing many compounds in just ng amounts. Therefore, isolation and standard NMR procedures for structure elucidation of unknowns cannot be used. GC/EI-MS analyses are well suited for identification of compounds in such samples because of the high chromatographic resolution, sensitivity, and mass spectra revealing skeletal and functional group information. In favorable cases, mass spectrometric analysis and GC retention index data can lead to a structural proposal for an unknown compound, a method frequently used for example, in chemical ecology, geochemistry, or metabolomics. Nonetheless, more complex target compounds are sometimes difficult to identify because the interpretation of mass spectra can become insufficient. At this point, IR offers orthogonal information, for example, on functional groups and double bonds. Solid-phase GC/IR techniques available nowadays allow the use of infrared detectors integrating high sensitivity with high chromatographic resolution comparable to GC/MS.[9] Finally, structural proposals developed by these methods have to be verified by synthesis, sometimes only successful by a trial-and-error method needing multiple syntheses to finally arrive at the correct structure.
We add here a third type of information to these methods, computational spectroscopy.[10] Combining solid-phase GC/IR analysis with DFT-simulations and MS data allows to select effectively candidate compounds worth considering for synthetic verification. This combination of methods led to the identification of a hitherto unknown class of volatile bicyclic lactones emitted by several Salinispora bacteria with minimal synthetic effort and without the need of isolation of the natural compounds (Figure S1, Supporting Information).
These lactones are structurally related to the A-factor, a bacterial autoregulator that triggers secondary metabolism and cellular differentiation in Streptomyces griseus.[11,12] Several A-factor like autoregulators carrying a monocyclic γ-butyrolactone core structure are already known from different Streptomycetes.[13–16]
The GC/MS analysis of volatile compounds extracted from liquid cultures of Salinispora arenicola CNQ748 showed three unknown compounds sharing the same characteristic ions m/z 140 and m/z 122 (Figure 1, A–C). Several other S. arenicola strains, CNS205, CNB527, CNH646, CNH996A, and CNQ748, produced the same compounds. Structural analysis was initially performed for compound B occurring in the highest concentration. A detailed analysis of the mass spectrum (Figure 2A) revealed the existence of a C5-acyl side-chain from which the two characteristic fragments arise by McLafferty rearrangement (m/z 140) and subsequent loss of water (m/z 122). Additional peaks resulting from alkyl chain fragmentation at m/z 153 by loss of an ethyl group from M+ at m/z 182 and at m/z 125 (α-carbonyl cleavage) supported this assignment (see Figure S3). GC/HR-MS delivered the molecular formula C10H14O3 (found 182.0972, calc. 182.0943) requiring four double-bond equivalents (DBE). Solid-phase GC/IR confirmed the presence of a ketone and an ester group, recognizable by their C–O double-bond stretching bands at 1696 and 1769 cm−1, respectively (Figure 2B).[17]
Figure 1.
Total-ion chromatogram of a headspace extract of a liquid culture of Salinispora arenicola CNQ748 obtained by CLSA. Compounds A–C are indicated.
Figure 2.
A) Mass spectrum and B) infrared spectrum of natural compound B.
The high energy of the ester stretching vibration indicated ring strain, excluding an open-chain ester. Another important piece of information was the absence of a C–C double-bond stretch vibration (1620–1680 cm−1). In order to reach the required number of DBEs without a C–C double-bond we proposed a [3.1.0]-bicyclic structure. Although a good amount of structural information was obtained, many candidate structures were still in agreement with the data, among them for example, compounds 1–8 (Figure 3). Synthesizing all possible isomers was therefore considered to be ineffective.
Figure 3.
Experimental infrared spectrum (bottom) and simulated IR spectra of the depicted structures based on lowest energy conformers. Conformational analysis with MMFF and optimization/frequency calculation using B3LYP-D/6–311G(p,d), scaling factor 0.975.
Consequently, we decided to apply dispersion-corrected DFT[18] (density functional theory) calculations at the B3LYP level of theory[19] to simulate the IR spectra of the relevant lactone isomers in question. The lowest energy conformer of each isomer was determined using a hybrid Monte Carlo/Low Frequency Mode algorithm[20] applying the MMFF[21] force field. In a second step, each of the global force field minima was subject to a DFT-based optimization and frequency calculation applying the B3LYP-D/6–311G(p,d) level of theory (Figure 3). Though we are comparing solid-state IR data with gas-phase computations,[22] the agreement between theory and experiment was sufficient for our purpose. The visual comparison of the fingerprint areas of the spectra revealed 8 as the most likely structure for B. A detailed discussion of the spectra is given in Figures S10–S17 in the Supporting Information. To quantify our results a computer-assisted comparison based on a first derivative correlation algorithm available through the GRAMS software package was performed, also revealing 8 as the most similar structure (see Figure S9 and Table S5).
A more sophisticated calculation with additional optimization steps and Boltzmann averaging of several conformers further emphasized the degree of similarity (Figure S18). The close resemblance between this simulation and the spectrum of the natural product justified the synthesis of compound 8.
The racemic synthesis started from commercially available ester 9 (Scheme 1). Saponification and subsequent esterification with allyl alcohol gave the enyne ester 16 that was converted into the target compound 8 under oxidizing conditions and Pd catalysis according to Sanford et al.[23] Structural proposals for compounds A and C, 18 and 19, were made with respect to the gas chromatographic retention index of each compound. The synthesis of 18 and 19 started from the terminal alkynes 10 and 11, which were transformed into acids 12 and 14 with CO2 and further developed as outlined in Scheme 1. Mass and IR spectra as well as gas chromatographic retention indices of compounds 8,18, and 19 matched those of the natural products A–C, thus confirming their identity (see Figure S2).
Scheme 1.
Racemic synthesis of bicyclic lactones 8, 18 and 19.
To determine the absolute configuration of B, an asymmetric synthesis was performed. Valeroyl chloride (20) was converted into the β-keto ester 21 utilizing meldrums acid and allyl alcohol.[24] The carbene precursor 22 was synthesized by diazo transfer under basic conditions.[25] The key step was the asymmetric copper-catalyzed intramolecular cyclopropanation described by Nakada and co-workers (Scheme 2).[26]
Scheme 2.
Asymmetric synthesis of 8 via intramolecular cyclopropanation.[25] ligand*: 2,2-bis((4S)-(—)-4-isopropyloxazoline)propane, p-ABSA: 4-acetamidobenzene sulfonyl azide.
The mediocre enantioselectivity of 52% ee under standard conditions could be slightly enhanced to 58% ee by lowering the reaction temperature, yet the yield dropped significantly. The absolute configuration of the major enantiomer suggested by the proposed transition state from Nakada et al. was proven by electronic circular dichroism measurements, DFT simulations, and literature comparison of the specific rotation of structurally related compounds (see Figures S19 and S20). Chiral GC/MS investigations disclosed the absolute configuration of the natural compound B using the synthesized scalemic mixture (see Figure S21). The natural compound B occurred in a 97:3 (1R,5S)/(1S,5R)-mixture. Both the natural compounds A and C were also submitted to chiral GC analyses and compared to the corresponding racemic mixtures as references. In each case the natural product was identical with the later eluting enantiomer (see Figure S12), indicating the same absolute configuration as found in B.
The biosynthesis of the A-factor (30), related to the salinilactones, has been investigated in detail (Scheme 3).[27] Horinouchi et al. showed that the enzyme A-factor synthase AfsA synthesizes ester 25 by coupling an acyl carrier protein (ACP) bound β-ketoacyl unit (24) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (23).[28] The phosphorylated ester 25 is then converted into lactone 26, followed by reduction to lactone 27 that only needs a phosphatase to release 30. We hypothesized that the salinilactones might be biosynthesized by the same pathway.
Scheme3.
Proposed biosynthesis of salinilactones based on A-factor biosynthesis in Streptomyces griseus.[4,27] The key intermediate, enolate 28, gives salinilactones via C-alkylation, while O-phosphorylation leads to salinipostins (29).
We recently reported the creation of a mutant of the AfsA-like gene called spt9 in the related isolate S. arenicola CNS205 associated with salinipostin biosynthesis.[29] In contrast to the wildtype, no salinilactones were detected in the mutant. Therefore, the biosynthetic routes of γ-butyrolactone signaling compounds and salinilactones seemed to be closely connected. Especially phosphate 27 seems to be a suitable precursor for salinilactone biosynthesis, offering a leaving group for the construction of the three-membered ring. We propose that compound 27 is enzymatically deprotonated to form enolate 28. This enolate can then form the cyclopropane unit of the salinilactones by C-alkylation via nucleophilic displacement of the phosphate group. We suspect that the phosphate 27 also gives rise to the recently discovered salinipostins (29), potent anti-malaria compounds also isolated from Salinispora,[4] as the spt9 knockout mutant also abolishes its biosynthesis.[29] The oxygen of enolate 28 likely attacks alternatively the phosphate group, or a derivative thereof, leading finally to 29.
γ-Butyrolactones like A-factor are generally produced in small amounts in Streptomyces. To determine the amount of salinilactones produced by Salinispora, we opted for an isotope dilution method. Therefore, the deuterated analogue d2-8 was synthesized and spiked to bacterial cultures. The following headspace analysis of liquid cultures, performed at different time points during the culture growth allowed determination of the amount of 8 produced and its time course.
Reduction of acryloyl chloride gave crude 1,1-d2-allyl alcohol[30] used for the synthesis of ester d2-16 that was converted to the deuterated bicyclic lactone d2-8 as described (see Scheme S1). S. arenicola CNS205, the strain with the highest production rate of salinilactones A–C was used for the spiking experiments (Figure 4). Awell grown liquid culture of strain CNS205 yielded about 500 μL−1 of salinilactone B. Quantification of salinilactones A and C was possible by referencing characteristic ions to the deuterated internal standard (Figure 4). The amounts of salinilactones produced by S. arenicola CNS205 are one order of magnitude higher than that of A-factor in Streptomyces griseus that produces 25–30 μgL−1.[31]
Figure 4.
Production of salinilactones A–C in a liquid culture of S. arenicola CNS205 within a six-day period. square: salinilactone A; circle: salinilactone B; triangle: salinilactone C.
Preliminary experiments were performed to test the biological effects of these compounds. Agar diffusion assays of the salinilactones A-C showed inhibition of growth of the test strain S. arenicola CNH996A that also can produce these metabolites. Similarly, growth of Streptomyces violaceoruber A3(2), producer of the γ-butyrolactone SCB1 closely related to the A-factor, was inhibited.[13] No inhibition was observed with loadings below 50 mg (see Supporting Information). The analysis of S. violaceoruber A3(2) showed no production of salinilactones. The self-inhibitory activity of the salinilactones may hint to a signaling function, but further experiments are needed to clarify the function of these compounds in the biology of Salinispora.
The salinilactones have an interesting structural feature, the reactive cyclopropane ring. An analysis of the relaxed DFT force constants revealed kinetically labile C–C bonds in the three-membered ring of 8 indicated by a deviation from the Badger rule by more than 20%, not far from the value for fluxional molecules.[32] The β-keto functionality on one side and the alkyl group on the other side are structural features of push-pull cyclopropanes, which show enhanced reactivity against nucleophiles and/or electrophiles.[33] Several synthetic strategies using this concept have been developed. Therefore, multiple activities of salinilactones in biological systems can be assumed. The bicyclic fused cyclopropabutyrolactone motif has not been reported before as a natural product.
In summary, we were able to combine solid-phase GC/IR and DFT-based simulation of infrared spectra to complement GC/MS analysis, thus enabling identification of natural compounds present in trace amounts without NMR spectros-copy. This approach led to the discovery of a new class of A-factor related γ-butyrolactones produced by Salinispora bacteria. Research on naturally occurring derivatives and the biological function of these unique fused bicyclic lactones is currently ongoing.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grant GM085770 to B.S.M. and a JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships postdoctoral fellowship from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science to Y.K. The authors thank Prof. Paul Jensen, Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, for the Salinispora strains and cultivation advice and Prof. Joachim Wink, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research in Braunschweig, for advice regarding the cultivation of Streptomycetes and the provision of streptomycete bacteria.
Footnotes
Supporting information and the ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201807923.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- [1].Jensen PR, Williams PG, Oh D-C, Zeigler L, Fenical W, Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2007, 73, 1146–1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Buchanan GO, Williams PG, Feling RH, Kauffman CA, Jensen PR, Fenical W, Org. Lett 2005, 7, 2731–2734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Jensen PR, Moore BS, Fenical W, Nat. Prod. Rep 2015, 32, 738–751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Schulze CJ, Navarro G, Ebert D, DeRisi J, Linington RG, J Org. Chem 2015, 80, 1312–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Feling RH, Buchanan GO, Mincer TJ, Kauffman CA, Jensen PR, Fenical W, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2003, 42, 355–357; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2003,115, 369–371. [Google Scholar]
- [6].Gulder TAM, Moore BS, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2010, 49, 9346–9367; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2010,122, 9534–9556. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Groenhagen U, de Oliveira ALL, Fielding E, Moore BS, Schulz S, ChemBioChem 2016,17, 1978–1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Schulz S, Fuhlendorff J, Reichenbach H, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 3863–3872. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Favaro CF, Zarbin PHG, J. Chem. Ecol 2013, 39, 1182–1185; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Herrera H, Barros-Parada W, Flores MF, Francke W, Fuentes-Contreras E, Rodriguez M, Santis F, Zarbin PHG, Bergmann J, Chem J. Ecol 2016, 42, 908–918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Grunenberg J, Computational Spectroscopy: Methods, Experiments and Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Khokhlov AS, Anisova LN, Tovarova II, Kleiner EM, Kovalenko IV, Krasilnikova OI, Kornitskaya EY, Pliner SA, Allg Z. Mikrobiol. 1973,13, 647–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Horinouchi S, Beppu T, Mol. Microbiol 1994,12, 859–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Takano E, Nihira T, Hava Y, Jones JJ, Gershater CJL, Yamada Y, Bibb M, J. Biol. Chem 2000, 275, 11010–11016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Efremenkova OV, Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem 2016, 42, 457–472. [Google Scholar]
- [15].Schulz S, Hotling S, Nat. Prod. Rep 2015, 32, 1042–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Willey JM, Gaskell AA, Chem. Rev 2011,111, 174–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Socrates G, Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies, 3rd ed., Wiley, Chichester, 2001, pp. 115–142. [Google Scholar]
- [18].Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H, J. Chem. Phys 2010, 132, 154104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Becke AD, J. Chem. Phys 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar]
- [20].Kolossvary I, Guida WC, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1996,118, 5011–5019. [Google Scholar]
- [21].Halgren TA, J. Comput. Chem 1996,17, 490–519. [Google Scholar]
- [22].Grunenberg J, Hopf H, Bahadir M, Pieper A, Vogt R, Wichmann H, Chem. Phys. Lett 2002, 366, 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Welbes LL, Lyons TW, Cychosz KA, Sanford MS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007,129, 5836–5837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Li L, Ma L, Wang X, Liu J, J. Heterocycl. Chem 2013,50,164–168. [Google Scholar]
- [25].Baum JS, Shook DA, Davies HML, Smith HD, Synth. Commun 1987,17, 1709–1716. [Google Scholar]
- [26].Honma M, Sawada T, Fujisawa Y, Utsugi M, Watanabe H, Umino A, Matsumura T, Hagihara T, Takano M, Nakada M, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003,125, 2860–2861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Sakuda S, Tanaka S, Mizuno K, Sukcharoen O, Nihira T, Yamada Y, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans 1 1993, 2309–2315; [Google Scholar]; Horinouchi S, Beppu T, Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 2007, 83, 277–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Kato J-Y, Funa N, Watanabe H, Onishi Y, Horinouchi S, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007,104, 2378–2383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Amos GCA, Awakawa T, Tuttle RN, Letzel A-C, Kim MC, Kudo Y, Fenical W, Moore BS, Jensen PR, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2017,114, E11121–E11130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Trost BM, Xu J, Schmidt T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 18343–18357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Ando N, Ueda K, Horinouchi S, Microbiology 1997,143,2715–2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Markopoulos G, Grunenberg J, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013,52, 10648–10651; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2013,125, 10842–10845. [Google Scholar]
- [33].Schneider TF, Kaschel J, Werz DB, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 5504–5523; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem 2014,126, 5608–5628. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







