Skip to main content
EJIFCC logoLink to EJIFCC
. 2018 Nov 7;29(3):221–226.

miRNA and Other Non-Coding RNAs as Promising Diagnostic Markers

Dorota Trzybulska 1, Eleni Vergadi 2, Christos Tsatsanis 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6247131  PMID: 30479608

Abstract

Since the discovery of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) a new area has emerged in the field of biomarkers. NcRNAs are RNA molecules of different sizes that are transcribed as independent genes or as part of protein coding genes and are not translated, therefore they do not produce proteins. They have been classified according to their size and function and include microRNAs (miRNAs), piwiRNAs (piRNAs), snoRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). These non-coding RNAs are present in different cell compartments participating in multiple cell functions, but they have also been identified in biological fluids, also known as cell-free or circulating ncRNAs, where they can be detected in exosomes, bound on lipoproteins as well as free circulating molecules. The role of circulating ncRNAs is still under investigation but are believed to be paracrine or endocrine messengers to systematically deliver signals between cells and tissues. Detecting ncRNAs in biological fluids has opened a new field in Clinical Chemistry utilizing them as biomarkers of diseases or prognostic markers for different pathological conditions. Herein, the different types of ncRNAs and their potential in the field of diagnostics are outlined.

Key words: miRNA, lncRNA, piRNA, serum, biomarkers, cancer, inflammation

INTRODUCTION

Protein-coding genes have been studied thoroughly during the last decades, even though they represent only 1.5% of the genome, which can increase to 2% if untranslated regions (UTRs) are included. The remaining genome, the non-protein coding region has remained a ‘black box’ until recently when characterization of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) has emerged, due to the development of novel nucleotide sequencing technologies. The importance of the ncRNAs has become increasingly apparent and our knowledge on the significance and contribution of ncRNAs in development and disease pathogenesis is expanding rapidly (1). NcRNAs can also explain phenotypic diversity between species given the fact that i.e. protein-coding genes are very similar among mammals while their ncRNAs do not exhibit the same level of similarity. The functional role of a class of ncRNAs, this of microRNAs (miRNAs), in cell physiology and human disease has been widely studied and acknowledged. In nearly all diseases miRNA expression pattern has been shown to differ both in tissues and extracellularly, contributing to disease pathogenesis. However, miRNAs are only the tip of the iceberg since additional ncRNAs are emerging as contributors of tissue homeostasis and regulators of cell function and fate. Hence, PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), transcribed small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), ultraconserved regions (T-UCRs), large intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs) and the heterogeneous group of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), are also key contributors to tissue homeostasis and disease pathogenesis. Among those, a significant number has been detected in biological fluids, allowing their use as circulating biomarkers.

Emergence of novel technologies has allowed to characterize sequences of ncRNAs in different healthy and diseased tissues as well as biological fluids from healthy and diseased individuals. The most prominent and widely studied ncRNAs are miRNAs which are already utilized as disease biomarkers.

miRNAs AS BIOMARKERS OF HUMAN DISEASE

After the discovery of miRNAs and their first association with human disease sixteen years ago (2), their contribution in human disease has been established. miRNAs are ncRNAs 19-24 nucleotides(nt) long, and control gene expression by targeting the 3’UTR of mRNAs leading them to degradation or inhibiting translation. Alternatively, miRNAs stabilize mRNA molecules and lead to more efficient translation, thus positively affecting gene expression (3). Changes in intracellular miRNA expression have been causally associated with multiple diseases including cancer (4), neurodegenerative diseases (5), cardiovascular diseases (6) and more. Similar as well as distinct changes in miRNA expression pattern has been observed in the serum of patients, introducing detection of serum miRNAs as biomarkers of human diseases (7). MiRNAs are present in the serum in different configurations; they are transported inside exosomes, bound on lipoproteins such as LDL and HDL, and also bound on proteins such as Argonaut 2 (Ago2) (8).

All configurations allow miRNAs to be uptaken by distant tissues and cells, altering gene expression in the target cells. Initial studies were focusing in functionally relevant miRNAs but utilization of serum-specific miRNA arrays has led to the identification of additional diagnostic and prognostic miRNAs. Recent work from our group has shown that miRNA levels in the serum are potential markers linking different diseases. For example, changes in miR-155-5p, miR-200a-3p, miR122-5p and miR-200c-3p are common determinants of male subfertility and metabolic disease, suggesting potential common causal events and mechanisms (9, 10). MiRNAs in the circulation can transmit information similar to that of cytokines, chemokines and hormones but with more specificity in targeting gene expression in the recipient cell. In the context of inflammation, expression of miRNAs such as miR-155-5p and let-7 family in the serum may modulate expression of their target genes such as SOCS1 or TLR4, thus limiting detrimental effects of inflammation or augmenting anti-pathogen responses from distant cells and organs (11-14).

piRNAs AS BIOMARKERS

PiRNAs are ncRNAs slightly larger than miRNAs having size of 24–30 nt and are characterized by their ability to bind to the PIWI subfamily of Argonaut family proteins which are involved in maintaining genome integrity in germline cells, primarily in those of the male (15, 16). PiRNAs are transcribed from genomic regions that contain transposable elements and other repetitive elements and is believed that their function is to suppress those. PiRNA/PIWI complexes bind on transposable elements and inhibit their mobilization either by cleavage of transposable element transcripts by PIWI proteins using a mechanism based on recognition of homology between piRNAs and transposable elements or through heterochromatin-mediated silencing of transposable element transcription. PiRNAs, even though they are not abundant, they utilize the ‘ping-pong’ amplification cycle based on PIWI proteins (such as PIWILI1, PIWIL1 and PIWIL4) resulting in generation of antisense molecules that repress transcripts. PIWI proteins are also involved in DNA methylation and piRNAs mediate epigenetic changes (17). PiRNAs are also expressed in additional cell types to germ cells including endothelial cells but their function remains to be elucidated (18). Recent reports have shown that piRNAs are present in biological fluids, primarily in the seminal fluid and their expression has been associated to fertility (19). Whether soluble piRNAs are signals to mediate information imprinting between cells is not known. Profiling of soluble piRNAs can provide functionally significant and, more importantly, cell-source specific biomarkers for diseases.

snoRNAs AS POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS

SnoRNAs is another family of ncRNAs of intermediate size ranging from 60 to 300 nucleotides. They are components of small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs), which are complexes controlling sequence-specific 2′ O-methylation and pseudouridylation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA). RRNAs are post-transcriptionally modified in the nucleolus facilitating rRNA folding and stability. SnoRNA sequences are responsible for targeting the assembled snoRNPs to a specific target (20). Recently snoRNAs have been detected in biological fluids and have been suggested to be useful as biomarkers (21, 22). Whether they possess functional significance in biofluids remains to be determined.

lncRNAs AS POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS

LncRNAs include a broad and heterogeneous family of non-coding RNAs defined by their size being over 200 nt long. LncRNAs are involved in a diverse array of biological processes. This family is the largest family of ncRNAs including the largest portion of the mammalian non-coding transcriptome. The main function of lncRNAs is regulation of gene expression. Thus, lncRNAs mediate epigenetic modifications of DNA by recruiting chromatin remodeling complexes to target genes and therefore controlling their temporal and spatial expression (23). Among the known functions of lncRNAs, one involves regulating chromatin accessibility through histone modification enzymes and RNA polymerases. Physiological processes such as X chromosome inactivation occurs by the X-inactivation specific transcript (XIST) lncRNA which recruits the polycomb complex to silence the X chromosome from which it is transcribed. TSIX, another lncRNA, is transcribed from the opposite strand to XIST and regulates XIST levels during X-chromosome inactivation (24). In addition, multiple lncRNAs are expressed by imprinted loci, where they contribute in genetic imprinting (25). A distinct family of lncRNAs are lincRNAs, which are transcribed from intergenic regions. LincRNAs control transcription, such as the p53 regulated lincRNA, lincRNA p21, which is located near the p21 gene and suppresses transcription when p53 is activated upon DNA damage (26). LincRNAs do not only regulate expression of neighboring genes but also act on distant ones. Another family of lncRNAs is this including lncRNAs transcribed from ultraconserved regions (UCRs). UCRs are conserved between vertebrates and are thought to date from a very early period in evolution. Some UCRs overlap with coding exons, although it is believed that more than half of the UCRs do not encode proteins. The UCRs that are transcribed are termed T-UTRs (27). The length of UCRs ranges from 200 to 80 nucleotides while T-UCRs have an unspliced length of up to 2kb. Their function remains unknown and the expression pattern has not been determined in disease conditions to allow them to serve as biomarkers.

OTHER ncRNAs AND THEIR POTENTIAL AS BIOMARKERS

Different ncRNAs have been shown to associate with transcriptional initiation sites such as the promoter-associated small RNAs (PASRs), promoter upstream transcripts (PROMPTs), the Transcription Start Site-associated RNAs (TSS-RNAs) and transcription initiation RNAs (tiRNAs) (28,29). The biological role of these ncRNAs is not well characterized but it is believed that they also regulate transcription. Another family of ncRNAs is this of telomeric repeat-containing RNAs (TERRAs), which are transcribed from telomeres (30). TERRAs regulate telomerase function and secure maintenance of heterochromatin integrity (31).

CONCLUSIONS

Since the initial characterization of non-coding RNAs and their identification as determinants on human disease pathogenesis, a new area in the field of biomarkers has emerged. Thus, our knowledge on the differential expression of different families of ncRNAs as well as their contribution in tissue homeostasis will open a new field of biomarkers that could be measured both in tissues and in biological fluids, and support disease diagnosis and prediction. A bottleneck at the moment in the field is the availability of automated rapid detection methods of ncRNAs and the identification of the most important ones that will serve as biomarkers. A list of different types of ncRNAs, their size, function and whether are currently used as biomarkers is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

ncRNAs, their function and use as biomarkers

Family of ncRNAs Size (nucleotides) Potential function Used as biomarker
miRNAs 19–24 Regulation of mRNA expression Yes, widely
piRNAs 26–31 Repression of transposons and DNA methylation in germ cells Yes, limited
tiRNAs 17–18 Regulation of transcription no
snoRNAs 60–300 Regulation of rRNAs Yes, limited
PASRs 22–200 Unknown no
TSSa-RNAs 20–90 Transcriptional regulation no
PROMPTs <200 Transcriptional regulation no
lincRNAs >200 Chromatin regulation Yes, limited
T-UCRs 200-780 Regulation of miRNAs no
Other lncRNAs >200 Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of gene expression Yes, limited

Ackgnowledgements

This article is part of the ReproUnion collaborative study, co-financed by the European Union, Interreg V ÖKS.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Esteller M. 2011. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet 12: 861-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Calin G. A., Dumitru C. D., Shimizu M., Bichi R., Zupo S., Noch E., Aldler H., Rattan S., Keating M., Rai K., Rassenti L., Kipps T., Negrini M., Bullrich F., Croce C. M. 2002. Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 15524-15529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.He L., Hannon G. J. 2004. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet 5: 522-531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Esquela-Kerscher A., Slack F. J. 2006. Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 6: 259-269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gupta P., Bhattacharjee S., Sharma A. R., Sharma G., Lee S. S., Chakraborty C. 2017. miRNAs in Alzheimer Disease - A Therapeutic Perspective. Curr Alzheimer Res 14: 1198-1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Navickas R., Gal D., Laucevicius A., Taparauskaite A., Zdanyte M., Holvoet P. 2016. Identifying circulating microRNAs as biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Res 111: 322-337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Backes C., Meese E., Keller A. 2016. Specific miRNA Disease Biomarkers in Blood, Serum and Plasma: Challenges and Prospects. Mol Diagn Ther 20: 509-518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Robbins P. D., Morelli A. E. 2014. Regulation of immune responses by extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Immunol 14: 195-208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Trzybulska D., Bobjer J., Giwercman A., Tsatsanis C. 2017. Serum microRNAs in male subfertility-biomarkers and a potential pathogenetic link to metabolic syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet 34: 1277-1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsatsanis C., Bobjer J., Rastkhani H., Dermitzaki E., Katrinaki M., Margioris A. N., Giwercman Y. L., Giwercman A. 2015. Serum miR-155 as a potential biomarker of male fertility. Hum Reprod 30: 853-860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Androulidaki A., Iliopoulos D., Arranz A., Doxaki C., Schworer S., Zacharioudaki V., Margioris A. N., Tsichlis P. N., Tsatsanis C. 2009. The kinase Akt1 controls macrophage response to lipopolysaccharide by regulating microRNAs. Immunity 31: 220-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vergadi E., Vaporidi K., Theodorakis E. E., Doxaki C., Lagoudaki E., Ieronymaki E., Alexaki V. I., Helms M., Kondili E., Soennichsen B., Stathopoulos E. N., Margioris A. N., Georgopoulos D., Tsatsanis C. 2014. Akt2 deficiency protects from acute lung injury via alternative macrophage activation and miR-146a induction in mice. J Immunol 192: 394-406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Doxaki C., Kampranis S. C., Eliopoulos A. G., Spilianakis C., Tsatsanis C. 2015. Coordinated Regulation of miR-155 and miR-146a Genes during Induction of Endotoxin Tolerance in Macrophages. J Immunol 195: 5750-5761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Trzybulska D., Eckersten D., Giwercman A., Christensson A., Tsatsanis C. 2018. Alterations in Serum MicroRNA Profile During Hemodialysis - Potential Biological Implications. Cell Physiol Biochem 46: 793-801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aravin A. A., Sachidanandam R., Girard A., Fejes-Toth K., Hannon G. J. 2007. Developmentally regulated piRNA clusters implicate MILI in transposon control. Science 316: 744-747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carmell M. A., Girard A., van de Kant H. J., Bourc’his D., Bestor T. H., de Rooij D. G., Hannon G. J. 2007. MIWI2 is essential for spermatogenesis and repression of transposons in the mouse male germline. Dev Cell 12: 503-514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Camprubi C., Cigliano R. A., Salas-Huetos A., Garrido N., Blanco J. 2017. What the human sperm methylome tells us. Epigenomics 9: 1299-1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yin K. J., Hamblin M., Chen Y. E. 2014. Non-coding RNAs in cerebral endothelial pathophysiology: emerging roles in stroke. Neurochem Int 77: 9-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hale B. J., Keating A. F., Yang C. X., Ross J. W. 2015. Small RNAs: Their Possible Roles in Reproductive Failure. Adv Exp Med Biol 868: 49-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kiss-Laszlo Z., Henry Y., Bachellerie J. P., Caizergues-Ferrer M., Kiss T. 1996. Site-specific ribose methylation of preribosomal RNA: a novel function for small nucleolar RNAs. Cell 85: 1077-1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Steinbusch M. M., Fang Y., Milner P. I., Clegg P. D., Young D. A., Welting T. J., Peffers M. J. 2017. Serum snoRNAs as biomarkers for joint ageing and post traumatic osteoarthritis. Sci Rep 7: 43558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Umu S. U., Langseth H., Bucher-Johannessen C., Fromm B., Keller A., Meese E., Lauritzen M., Leithaug M., Lyle R., Rounge T. B. 2018. A comprehensive profile of circulating RNAs in human serum. RNA Biol 15: 242-250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gupta R. A., Shah N., Wang K. C., Kim J., Horlings H. M., Wong D. J., Tsai M. C., Hung T., Argani P., Rinn J. L., Wang Y., Brzoska P., Kong B., Li R., West R. B., van de Vijver M. J., Sukumar S., Chang H. Y. 2010. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature 464: 1071-1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Navarro P., Page D. R., Avner P., Rougeulle C. 2006. Tsix-mediated epigenetic switch of a CTCF-flanked region of the Xist promoter determines the Xist transcription program. Genes Dev 20: 2787-2792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guttman M., Amit I., Garber M., French C., Lin M. F., Feldser D., Huarte M., Zuk O., Carey B. W., Cassady J. P., Cabili M. N., Jaenisch R., Mikkelsen T. S., Jacks T., Hacohen N., Bernstein B. E., Kellis M., Regev A., Rinn J. L., Lander E. S. 2009. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458: 223-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huarte M., Guttman M., Feldser D., Garber M., Koziol M. J., Kenzelmann-Broz D., Khalil A. M., Zuk O., Amit I., Rabani M., Attardi L. D., Regev A., Lander E. S., Jacks T., Rinn J. L. 2010. A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell 142: 409-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lujambio A., Portela A., Liz J., Melo S. A., Rossi S., Spizzo R., Croce C. M., Calin G. A., Esteller M. 2010. CpG island hypermethylation-associated silencing of noncoding RNAs transcribed from ultraconserved regions in human cancer. Oncogene 29: 6390-6401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kapranov P., Cheng J., Dike S., Nix D. A., Duttagupta R., Willingham A. T., Stadler P. F., Hertel J., Hackermuller J., Hofacker I. L., Bell I., Cheung E., Drenkow J., Dumais E., Patel S., Helt G., Ganesh M., Ghosh S., Piccolboni A., Sementchenko V., Tammana H., Gingeras T. R. 2007. RNA maps reveal new RNA classes and a possible function for pervasive transcription. Science 316: 1484-1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Preker P., Nielsen J., Kammler S., Lykke-Andersen S., Christensen M. S., Mapendano C. K., Schierup M. H., Jensen T. H. 2008. RNA exosome depletion reveals transcription upstream of active human promoters. Science 322: 1851-1854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Montero J. J., Lopez-Silanes I., Megias D., M F. F., Castells-Garcia A., Blasco M. A. 2018. TERRA recruitment of polycomb to telomeres is essential for histone trymethylation marks at telomeric heterochromatin. Nat Commun 9: 1548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Koch L. 2017. Non-coding RNA: A protective role for TERRA at telomeres. Nat Rev Genet 18: 453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from EJIFCC are provided here courtesy of International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

RESOURCES