Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Hemodial Int. 2017 Mar 22;21(Suppl 1):S21–S27. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12556

Markers of Iron Status in Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosing Iron Deficiency

Adam E Gaweda 1
PMCID: PMC6247786  NIHMSID: NIHMS995613  PMID: 28328097

Abstract

Anemia is one of the main comorbidities related to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Until the advent of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA), endogenous erythropoietin deficiency has been thought to be the main culprit of anemia in CKD patients. The use of ESA’s has shed new light on the physiology of CKD anemia, where iron homeostasis plays an increasingly important role. Disorders of iron homeostasis occurring in CKD turn the anemia management in those patients into a complex multifactorial therapeutic task, where ESA and Iron dose must be properly balanced to achieve the desired outcome without exposing the patients to the risk of serious adverse events. This review covers diagnostic markers traditionally used for quantifying iron status in CKD patients, such as serum ferritin and transferrin saturation, new ones, such as reticulocyte hemoglobin content and percent hypochromic red cells, as well as experimental ones, such as hepcidin and soluble transferrin receptor. Each marker is presented in terms of their diagnostic performance, followed by biological and analytical variability data. Advantages and disadvantages of each marker are briefly discussed. Although serum ferritin and transferrin saturation are easily available, they exhibit large biological variability and require caution when used for diagnosing iron status in CKD patients. Reticulocyte hemoglobin content and the percentage of hypochromic red cells are more powerful, but their widespread use is hampered by the issue of sample stability in storage. Soluble transferrin receptor and hepcidin show promise, but require further investigation as well as the development of standardized, low-cost assay platforms.

Introduction

Anemia is one of the most common comorbidities of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and is precipitated by multiple mechanisms including but not limited to: 1) decline in endogenous erythropoietin production in kidneys1, 2, 2) shortened erythrocyte survival35 3) nutritional deficiencies (folate, vitamin B12)6, 7. The introduction of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) revolutionized the treatment of anemia in patients with advanced CKD8, whose primary form of treatment up to that point consisted of repeated blood transfusions potentially leading to secondary iron overload9. Although the use of rHuEpo freed patients from transfusion dependence and reduced the risk of iron overload, it brought to light another important role that this metal plays in the anemia of CKD10. Being the oxygen carrier while at the same time having the ability to damage cells through free radicals, systemic iron must be tightly balanced11.

In healthy individuals, iron is recycled from the senescent erythrocytes and transported via the reticuloendothelial system into the bone marrow where it is incorporated into erythroblasts1. Normal iron homeostasis is maintained by compensating daily loss through duodenal absorption of dietary iron12. Due to increased blood losses, especially in dialysis dependent patients13, as well as potentially compromised gastrointestinal iron absorption 1416, the total body iron stores in CKD patients are likely to be depleted resulting in absolute iron deficiency. In addition, many CKD patients suffer from functional iron deficiency, defined as the inability to deliver sufficient iron amount to the site of erythroblast production, even in presence of adequate stores, typically due to reticuloendothelial cell iron blockade. Due to the multifactorial nature, proper quantification of the iron status in CKD patients is challenging.

Methods of Iron Quantification

Existing clinical practice guidelines focus on measuring iron status using two standard indices: 1) serum ferritin and 2) transferrin saturation17.

Serum Ferritin

Ferritin is the main iron storage protein whose production is regulated by the intracellular iron concentration. Each ferritin molecule has a capacity to store more than 4000 iron atoms18. Analysis of ferritin iron content has revealed that despite elevated ferritin concentration, hemodialysis patients might have a decreased ferritin iron content19. In addition to functioning as iron storage, ferritin is also regulated by acute phase proteins 20, 21.

Ferritin concentration is commonly used as the primary index for diagnosing absolute iron deficiency. Whereas low levels of ferritin concentration (<100 ng/dL – non-dialysis, <200ng/dL – dialysis-dependent) enable physician to reliably diagnose absolute iron deficiency, there exists no consensus as to the upper ferritin limit in dialysis dependent CKD patients2224. Retrospective analyses of the erythropoietic response previously showed that elevated ferritin concentrations might predict erythropoietic hyporesponsiveness25, 26, potentially caused by the malnutrition inflammation complex syndrome27. On the other hand, a steady rise in average ferritin levels that has been observed among dialysis patient population in the United States has been attributed to the increase in intravenous iron utilization and the decrease in Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESA) use 28.

Several studies analyzed biological and analytical variability of serum ferritin29, 30. Both studies concluded that due to large biological variability, single measurements of serum ferritin had limited diagnostic value in evaluating iron status in CKD patients and should not be used to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment of iron deficiency. In clinical practice, serum ferritin is measured at quarterly intervals in both non-dialysis and dialysis dependent CKD patients. To improve the diagnostic performance of serum ferritin, a more frequent measurement schedule might be necessary.

Transferrin Saturation

Plasma transferrin is a glycoprotein with two iron-binding domains and is synthesized by the liver31. It is the most important vehicle for transporting iron into cells and preventing iron-mediated free radical toxicity. Approximately 3 mg of iron (0.1% of total body iron stores) circulates in the plasma and is bound to transferrin. The sum of all iron binding sites on plasma transferrin is known as Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC). Transferrin Saturation (TSat) is the ratio of total number of occupied iron binding sites to TIBC. The number of available iron binding sites is known as Unsaturated Iron Binding Capacity (UIBC). In healthy individuals, approximately one-third of the iron binding sites are occupied (TSat ≈ 33 %) 32. When the total iron-binding capacity of transferrin is exceeded, Non-Transferrin Bound Iron (NTBI) is produced. NTBI is virtually undetectable until TSat reaches 80%33.

In the care of CKD patients, low TSat (< 20%) combined with low serum ferritin is diagnostic of absolute iron deficiency. Low TSat combined with normal or elevated serum ferritin is diagnostic of functional iron deficiency. Retrospective analyses of erythropoietic responsiveness showed that maximum erythropoietic response is achieved at TSat levels greater than 30%25, 26, 34. Iron repletion / supplementation protocols used by most dialysis organizations in the United States specify TSat target range 30-50%.

Biological and analytical variability of TSat and serum iron has been studied repeatedly29, 3538. All studies consistently report remarkable biological variability of TSat (as high as 38%29). Although some of this variability could be partially explained by diurnal changes in serum iron concentration39, these results call for caution when using TSat to quantify iron status in CKD patients. Similar to serum ferritin, a more frequent measurement schedule might be required to improve the diagnostic performance.

Other readily available laboratory parameters can be used to aid iron status quantification in CKD patients40. These include: 1) reticulocyte hemoglobin content (equivalent), 2) percentage hypochromic red cells.

Reticulocyte Hemoglobin Content (Equivalent)

Under normal erythropoietic conditions, young erythrocytes (reticulocytes) are released from the bone marrow into circulation and become mature erythrocytes after several days. Reticulocyte Hemoglobin Content (CHr), first introduced in Siemens analyzers, quantifies hemoglobin mass in reticulocytes, providing information about a short-term change in iron status. In a study of 78 patients undergoing bone marrow examination, CHr proved superior to serum ferritin and TSat in diagnosing iron status in the bone marrow41. In patients with pre-existing diagnosis of functional iron deficiency, CHr turned out to be a better predictor of response to intravenous iron treatment compared to serum ferritin and TSat42. CHr is approved both in United States and Europe as marker of functional iron deficiency with a diagnostic threshold of 29 pg.

Reticulocyte Hemoglobin Equivalent (RetHe), introduced by Sysmex, is an alternative measure of hemoglobin mass in reticulocytes. Multiple studies found strong correlation between RetHe and CHr in iron deficient CKD patients43, 44. In a study of 504 subjects with different anemia etiologies, a diagnostic threshold of 25 pg was established to identify iron deficiency (<25 pg) from other forms of anemia44. Furthermore, in a study of 40 dialysis patients, Urrechaga et al.45 found RetHe to be a reliable predictor of response to intravenous iron supplementation at a diagnostic threshold of 30.8 pg.

Van Wyck et al. 29 demonstrated that biological and analytical variability of CHr was significantly smaller than that of serum ferritin and TSat. When measuring CHr (RetHe) in clinical practice, the time delay between blood sample draw and analysis should be taken into account when interpreting the results. Dialysis organizations in the United States typically use centralized laboratories with specimen shipment times ranging between 24 to 48 hours. Due to the quick maturation process of reticulocytes, there is a risk that this time delay may introduce measurement bias. A study of sample stability by Lippi et al. 46 showed that there was a small but statistically significant decrease in CHr values when samples were stored for 24 hours in 4 C.

A study of 60 newly diagnosed elderly anemic patients compared the utility of CHr and Mean Cellular Hemoglobin (MCH) in screening for iron deficiency using bone marrow stain as a gold standard47. Both markers showed comparable diagnostic performance at thresholds of 30.5 pg (CHr) and 28.5 pg (MCH), respectively. This finding suggests that MCH, which is usually reported as part of a standard Complete Blood Count panel, may be a useful alternative for diagnosing iron deficiency when CHr or RetHe are not available. CHr (RetHe) provide information about short-term trends and may be useful for monitoring early response to ESA/Iron dose changes. On the other hand, MCH provides information about long-term trends and may be more useful during maintenance therapy.

Percentage Hypochromic Red Cells

Hypochromic red cells (HRC) are erythrocytes with Mean Cellular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) less than 28g/dL. The clinical utility of %HRC in diagnosing functional iron deficiency was first described by Macdougall et al. 48. With a diagnostic threshold of 6 %, %HRC was found to be superior to other iron indices in detection of iron deficiency49. Similar to CHr, %HRC was first introduced on Siemens analyzers. Sysmex introduced another measure of hypochromia, %Hypo-He, which defines red cells with MCH < 17 pg. In a previously mentioned study, Urrechaga et al. demonstrated the reliability of %Hypo-He in predicting response to iron supplementation at a diagnostic threshold of 2.4%45. Several other studies demonstrate the utility of %HRC and %Hypo-He in diagnosing iron deficiency and predicting response to intravenous iron treatment in CKD patients5052.

Because measurement of %HRC and %Hypo-He takes into account the size of the erythrocytes, the clinical utility of this test is somewhat compromised when samples are shipped to centralized laboratories as is the case in the United States, due to the fact that erythrocytes may expand in storage40.

In addition to above mentioned laboratory parameters, commercially available on automated analyzers, there are other parameters that may shed more light on the pathophysiology of iron deficiency component of CKD anemia: 1) soluble transferrin receptor, 2) hepcidin.

Soluble Transferrin Receptor

Iron uptake into erythroid precursors occurs through internalizing transferrin bound iron. The transferrin bound iron binds to transferrin receptors present on the surface of the plasma membrane and is internalized through endosomes ultimately leading to the release of iron. Plasma membrane bound transferrin receptors are released into the blood in form of a truncated soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR). Iron-restricted erythropoiesis may cause overexpression of sTfR, as increased number of transferrin receptors may come off the surface of the erythroblasts and become detectable5355.

Soluble transferrin receptor has been demonstrated to be superior to serum ferritin in differentiating between iron deficiency anemia and anemia of inflammation56. However, in CKD patients receiving ESA treatment, sTfR appears to be more of a marker of erythropoietic activity itself than iron-restricted erythropoiesis57, 58. Evaluation of sTfR as a predictor of response to intravenous iron treatment in dialysis dependent CKD patients on ESA showed that at a diagnostic threshold of 1.5mg/L, sTfR was superior to serum ferritin and TSat, but inferior to %HRC and CHr49. A measure combining sTfR and serum ferritin (sTfR index), calculated as the ratio of sTfR to log-transformed serum ferritin 59 was evaluated in 121 dialysis-dependent CKD patients and at a diagnostic threshold value of 0.6 proved to be superior to serum ferritin and TSat in predicting response to intranvenous iron treatment60. In a study of 145 patients with iron deficiency anemia or anemia of chronic disease, Skikne et al.61 showed that the sTfR index was superior to sTfR alone in differentiating between the two anemia etiologies. They also showed a doubling in detection rate in iron deficiency anemia when all serum ferritin, sTfR, and sTfR index were used together, compared to using ferritin alone. Although further studies might be needed to shed more light on the diagnostic utility of sTfR, currently available evidence suggests that this marker is best used in combination with other iron indices. Clinical utility of sTfR as a measure of iron status in CKD patients is further compromised by the cost of the assay and the lack of standardization.

Hepcidin

Hepcidin is a peptide produced by the liver to regulate iron absorption and mobilization62. Hepcidin level is affected by iron stores, inflammation states, and erythropoiesis63, 64. These factors, as well as decreased renal clearance are believed to be the main determinants of hepcidin levels in CKD patients65.

In a study of 20 dialysis-dependent CKD patients, there was a significant short-term reduction of serum hepcidin after dialysis treatment 66. Hepcidin concentration was further positively correlated with serum ferritin and TSat, negatively correlated with reticulocyte count, and not correlated to inflammatory cytokines. Hepcidin concentration has been demonstrated to decrease following administration of ESA administration in some studies63, 67. In a study of 56 dialysis-dependent CDK patients, Tessitore et al.68 showed that serum hepcidin concentration was not an important predictor of a response to intravenous iron treatment in patients receiving ESA. A similar conclusion was reached by the FIND-CKD investigators69. Further studies are ongoing to determine whether and how hepcidin measurement can be used to quantify iron status in patients with CKD anemia. An assessment of biological hepcidin variability over 2- to 6-week period suggests that short-term measurement of hepcidin might not be useful for guiding clinical decisions regarding iron status in CKD patients70. The potential clinical utility of hepcidin as a marker of iron status is further complicated by the lack of consensus on a unified methodology and standards to measure hepcidin.

Conclusion

Anemia in CKD patients is a multifactorial complex problem influenced by the combination of insufficient erythropoietin production, absolute and function iron deficiency, as well as chronic inflammatory states. As of now, a nephrologist treating anemia has a choice diagnostic tools at their disposal to discern the anemia etiology. While serum ferritin and transferrin saturation have been the most commonly used laboratory parameters due to their wide availability, both these markers are subject to excessive biological variability and require caution when used for guiding iron supplementation in CKD patients. Cellular indices of iron status, such as reticulocyte hemoglobin content or percentage of hypochromic red cells, based on the iron content measurement in newly created erythrocytes, are more powerful in diagnosing anemia as well as guiding the treatment. Their widespread use is hampered by the issue of sample stability in storage. Newly available parameters, such as soluble transferrin receptor and hepcidin show promise, but require further investigation to establish the exact way in which they can be used in diagnosing the etiology of CKD anemia. For future use in the clinical practice, these new markers will also require development of standardized, low-cost assay platforms.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: None

References

  • 1.Eschbach JW, Haley NR, Adamson JW. The anemia of chronic renal failure: pathophysiology and effects of recombinant erythropoietin. Contrib Nephrol. 1990;78: 24–36; discussion 37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Besarab A Recombinant human erythropoietin: physiology, pathophysiology of anemia in renal failure, and economic aspects related to dosing. Am J Nephrol. 1990;10 Suppl 2: 2–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Handelman GJ, Levin NW. Red cell survival: relevance and mechanism involved. J Ren Nutr. 2010;20(5 Suppl): S84–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kalicki RM, Uehlinger DE. Red cell survival in relation to changes in the hematocrit: more important than you think. Blood Purif. 2008;26(4): 355–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vos FE, Schollum JB, Coulter CV, Doyle TC, Duffull SB, Walker RJ. Red blood cell survival in long-term dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58(4): 591–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Teschner M, Kosch M, Schaefer RM. Folate metabolism in renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17 Suppl 5: 24–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zachee P, Chew SL, Daelemans R, Lins RL. Erythropoietin resistance due to vitamin B12 deficiency. Case report and retrospective analysis of B12 levels after erythropoietin treatment. Am J Nephrol. 1992;12(3): 188–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Adamson JW, Eschbach JW. Erythropoietin for end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(9): 625–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eschbach JW, Adamson JW. Iron overload in renal failure patients: changes since the introduction of erythropoietin therapy. Kidney Int Suppl. 1999;69: S35–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Babitt JL, Lin HY. Mechanisms of anemia in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(10): 1631–1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Emerit J, Beaumont C, Trivin F. Iron metabolism, free radicals, and oxidative injury. Biomed Pharmacother. 2001;55(6): 333–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ganz T Systemic iron homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(4): 1721–1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sargent JA, Acchiardo SR. Iron requirements in hemodialysis. Blood Purif. 2004;22(1): 112–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Macdougall IC. Strategies for iron supplementation: oral versus intravenous. Kidney Int Suppl. 1999;69: S61–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Macdougall IC. Iron supplementation in the non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) patient: oral or intravenous? Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(2): 473–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Magana L, Dhar SK, Smith EC, Martinez C. Iron absorption and utilization in maintenance hemodialysis patients: oral and intravenous routes. Mt Sinai J Med. 1984;51(2): 180–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Locatelli F, Barany P, Covic A, De Francisco A, Del Vecchio L, Goldsmith D, et al. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines on anaemia management in chronic kidney disease: a European Renal Best Practice position statement. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(6): 1346–1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harrison PM, Arosio P. The ferritins: molecular properties, iron storage function and cellular regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1275(3): 161–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Spada PL, Rossi C, Alimonti A, Bocca B, Cozza V, Ricerca BM, et al. Ferritin iron content in haemodialysis patients: comparison with septic and hemochromatosis patients. Clin Biochem. 2008;41(12): 997–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rogers JT, Bridges KR, Durmowicz GP, Glass J, Auron PE, Munro HN. Translational control during the acute phase response. Ferritin synthesis in response to interleukin-1. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(24): 14572–14578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stam TC, Swaak AJ, Kruit WH, Eggermont AM. Regulation of ferritin: a specific role for interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha)? The acute phase response in patients treated with IFN-alpha-2b. Eur J Clin Invest. 2002;32 Suppl 1: 79–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kapoian T, O’Mara NB, Singh AK, Moran J, Rizkala AR, Geronemus R, et al. Ferric gluconate reduces epoetin requirements in hemodialysis patients with elevated ferritin. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(2): 372–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fishbane S, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Nissenson AR. Serum ferritin in chronic kidney disease: reconsidering the upper limit for iron treatment. Semin Dial. 2004;17(5): 336–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fishbane S Upper limit of serum ferritin: misinterpretation of the 2006 KDOQI anemia guidelines. Semin Dial. 2008;21(3): 217–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gaweda AE, Goldsmith LJ, Brier ME, Aronoff GR. Iron, inflammation, dialysis adequacy, nutritional status, and hyperparathyroidism modify erythropoietic response. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(4): 576–581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lee GH, Miller JE, Streja E, Jing J, Robertson JA, Kovesdy CP. Predictors of hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53(5): 823–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kalantar-Zadeh K, Rodriguez RA, Humphreys MH. Association between serum ferritin and measures of inflammation, nutrition and iron in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(1): 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karaboyas A, Zee J, Morgenstern H, Nolen JG, Hakim R, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Understanding the Recent Increase in Ferritin Levels in United States Dialysis Patients: Potential Impact of Changes in Intravenous Iron and Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Dosing. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(10): 1814–1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Van Wyck DB, Alcorn H, Jr., Gupta R. Analytical and biological variation in measures of anemia and iron status in patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(3): 540–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ford BA, Coyne DW, Eby CS, Scott MG. Variability of ferritin measurements in chronic kidney disease; implications for iron management. Kidney Int. 2009;75(1): 104–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huebers HA, Finch CA. The physiology of transferrin and transferrin receptors. Physiol Rev. 1987;67(2): 520–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huebers HA, Eng MJ, Josephson BM, Ekpoom N, Rettmer RL, Labbe RF, et al. Plasma iron and transferrin iron-binding capacity evaluated by colorimetric and immunoprecipitation methods. Clin Chem. 1987;33(2 Pt 1): 273–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Piga A, Longo F, Duca L, Roggero S, Vinciguerra T, Calabrese R, et al. High nontransferrin bound iron levels and heart disease in thalassemia major. Am J Hematol. 2009;84(1): 29–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gaweda AE, Bhat P, Maglinte GA, Chang CL, Hill J, Park GS, et al. TSAT is a better predictor than ferritin of hemoglobin response to Epoetin alfa in US dialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2014;18(1): 38–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dale JC, Burritt MF, Zinsmeister AR. Diurnal variation of serum iron, iron-binding capacity, transferrin saturation, and ferritin levels. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117(5): 802–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Statland BE, Winkel P, Bokelund H. Variation of serum iron concentration in young healthy men: Within-day and day-to-day changes. Clin Biochem. 1976;9(1): 26–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adams PC, Reboussin DM, Press RD, Barton JC, Acton RT, Moses GC, et al. Biological variability of transferrin saturation and unsaturated iron-binding capacity. Am J Med. 2007;120(11): 999 e991–997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Borel MJ, Smith SM, Derr J, Beard JL. Day-to-day variation in iron-status indices in healthy men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54(4): 729–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Speck B Diurnal variation of serum iron and the latent iron-binding in normal adults. Helv Med Acta. 1968;34(3): 231–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wish JB. Assessing iron status: beyond serum ferritin and transferrin saturation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1 Suppl 1: S4–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mast AE, Blinder MA, Lu Q, Flax S, Dietzen DJ. Clinical utility of the reticulocyte hemoglobin content in the diagnosis of iron deficiency. Blood. 2002;99(4): 1489–1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chuang CL, Liu RS, Wei YH, Huang TP, Tarng DC. Early prediction of response to intravenous iron supplementation by reticulocyte haemoglobin content and high-fluorescence reticulocyte count in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18(2): 370–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brugnara C, Schiller B, Moran J. Reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent (Ret He) and assessment of iron-deficient states. Clin Lab Haematol. 2006;28(5): 303–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Canals C, Remacha AF, Sarda MP, Piazuelo JM, Royo MT, Romero MA. Clinical utility of the new Sysmex XE 2100 parameter - reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent - in the diagnosis of anemia. Haematologica. 2005;90(8): 1133–1134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Urrechaga E, Boveda O, Aguayo FJ, de la Hera P, Munoz RI, Gallardo I, Escanero JF. Percentage of hypochromic erythrocytes and reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent predictors of response to intravenous iron in hemodialysis patients. Int J Lab Hematol. 2016;38(4): 360–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Solero GP, Franchini M, Guidi GC. Stability of blood cell counts, hematologic parameters and reticulocytes indexes on the Advia A120 hematologic analyzer. J Lab Clin Med. 2005;146(6): 333–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Karlsson T Comparative evaluation of the reticulocyte hemoglobin content assay when screening for iron deficiency in elderly anemic patients. Anemia. 2011;2011: 925907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Macdougall IC, Cavill I, Hulme B, Bain B, McGregor E, McKay P, et al. Detection of functional iron deficiency during erythropoietin treatment: a new approach. BMJ. 1992;304(6821): 225–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tessitore N, Solero GP, Lippi G, Bassi A, Faccini GB, Bedogna V, et al. The role of iron status markers in predicting response to intravenous iron in haemodialysis patients on maintenance erythropoietin. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(7): 1416–1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cullen P, Soffker J, Hopfl M, Bremer C, Schlaghecken R, Mehrens T, et al. Hypochromic red cells and reticulocyte haemglobin content as markers of iron-deficient erythropoiesis in patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14(3): 659–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rehu M, Ahonen S, Punnonen K. The diagnostic accuracy of the percentage of hypochromic red blood cells (%HYPOm) and cellular hemoglobin in reticulocytes (CHr) in differentiating iron deficiency anemia and anemia of chronic diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(19–20): 1809–1813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jones CH, Richardson D, Ayers S, Newstead CG, Will EJ, Davison AM. Percentage hypochromic red cells and the response to intravenous iron therapy in anaemic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(11): 2873–2876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cazzola M, Beguin Y. New tools for clinical evaluation of erythron function in man. Br J Haematol. 1992;80(3): 278–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.R’Zik S, Beguin Y. Serum soluble transferrin receptor concentration is an accurate estimate of the mass of tissue receptors. Exp Hematol. 2001;29(6): 677–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Skikne BS, Flowers CH, Cook JD. Serum transferrin receptor: a quantitative measure of tissue iron deficiency. Blood. 1990;75(9): 1870–1876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ferguson BJ, Skikne BS, Simpson KM, Baynes RD, Cook JD. Serum transferrin receptor distinguishes the anemia of chronic disease from iron deficiency anemia. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;119(4): 385–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chiang WC, Tsai TJ, Chen YM, Lin SL, Hsieh BS. Serum soluble transferrin receptor reflects erythropoiesis but not iron availability in erythropoietin-treated chronic hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2002;58(5): 363–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tarng DC, Huang TP. Determinants of circulating soluble transferrin receptor level in chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(6): 1063–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Punnonen K, Irjala K, Rajamaki A. Serum transferrin receptor and its ratio to serum ferritin in the diagnosis of iron deficiency. Blood. 1997;89(3): 1052–1057. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen YC, Hung SC, Tarng DC. Association between transferrin receptor-ferritin index and conventional measures of iron responsiveness in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(6): 1036–1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Skikne BS, Punnonen K, Caldron PH, Bennett MT, Rehu M, Gasior GH, et al. Improved differential diagnosis of anemia of chronic disease and iron deficiency anemia: a prospective multicenter evaluation of soluble transferrin receptor and the sTfR/log ferritin index. Am J Hematol. 2011;86(11): 923–927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ganz T Hepcidin and its role in regulating systemic iron metabolism. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2006: 29–35, 507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ashby DR, Gale DP, Busbridge M, Murphy KG, Duncan ND, Cairns TD, et al. Erythropoietin administration in humans causes a marked and prolonged reduction in circulating hepcidin. Haematologica. 2010;95(3): 505–508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ashby DR, Gale DP, Busbridge M, Murphy KG, Duncan ND, Cairns TD, et al. Plasma hepcidin levels are elevated but responsive to erythropoietin therapy in renal disease. Kidney Int. 2009;75(9): 976–981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zaritsky J, Young B, Wang HJ, Westerman M, Olbina G, Nemeth E, et al. Hepcidin--a potential novel biomarker for iron status in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(6): 1051–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Weiss G, Theurl I, Eder S, Koppelstaetter C, Kurz K, Sonnweber T, et al. Serum hepcidin concentration in chronic haemodialysis patients: associations and effects of dialysis, iron and erythropoietin therapy. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009;39(10): 883–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.van der Putten K, Jie KE, van den Broek D, Kraaijenhagen RJ, Laarakkers C, Swinkels DW, et al. Hepcidin-25 is a marker of the response rather than resistance to exogenous erythropoietin in chronic kidney disease/chronic heart failure patients. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(9): 943–950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tessitore N, Girelli D, Campostrini N, Bedogna V, Pietro Solero G, Castagna A, et al. Hepcidin is not useful as a biomarker for iron needs in haemodialysis patients on maintenance erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(12): 3996–4002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gaillard CA, Bock AH, Carrera F, Eckardt KU, Van Wyck DB, Bansal SS, et al. Hepcidin Response to Iron Therapy in Patients with Non-Dialysis Dependent CKD: An Analysis of the FIND-CKD Trial. PLoS One. 2016;11(6): e0157063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ford BA, Eby CS, Scott MG, Coyne DW. Intra-individual variability in serum hepcidin precludes its use as a marker of iron status in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2010;78(8): 769–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES