Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1933–1934. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12291

Provision of Naloxone Without a Prescription by California Pharmacists 2 Years After Legislation Implementation

Talia Puzantian 1,, James J Gasper 2
PMCID: PMC6248130  PMID: 30422185

Abstract

This study assesses the availability of pharmacist-furnished naloxone 2 years after implementation of legislation in California allowing provision of the drug without a physician’s prescription.


Layperson access to the opioid overdose reversal medication naloxone can reduce mortality.1,2 Legislation in California has allowed trained pharmacists to furnish naloxone without a physician’s prescription since January 27, 2016.3 Under a Board of Pharmacy protocol, naloxone is available by patient request or pharmacist suggestion. A furnishing pharmacist is required to screen and educate patients on opioid overdose prevention, recognition, and response. With patient consent, the pharmacist must notify the primary physician that naloxone was furnished. We estimated the availability of pharmacist-furnished naloxone 2 years after implementation.

Methods

The Office for Human Research Protections at Claremont Graduate University deemed this study nonhuman research. An anonymous telephone survey of a 20% random sample of California community pharmacies was conducted between January 23 and February 28, 2018. The California State Board of Pharmacy website was accessed on January 2, 2018, to identify all licensed California pharmacies, excluding pharmacies with canceled, revoked, probationary, or restricted licenses and hospital, correctional, or specialty pharmacies. Thirty trained interviewers posed as potential customers. Using a standardized script, they asked any pharmacy staff: “I heard that you can get naloxone from a pharmacy without a prescription from your doctor. Can I do that at your pharmacy?” If the response was affirmative, they asked what formulations were available, the cash price, and whether naloxone could be billed to insurance. Additional unsolicited information was recorded.

Proportions with 95% confidence intervals, medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs), and χ2 tests comparing differences in availability by urbanity (census tract designation) and pharmacy type (independent or chain, defined as ≥5 locations) were estimated using Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp). With a power of 85% and α = .05, the sample size required to detect an effect size of 0.1 in χ2 tests comparing differences in availability by urbanity and pharmacy type was n = 898. Statistical significance was set at a 2-tailed P < .05.

Results

Of 6962 California pharmacies, 6047 were eligible, 1209 were surveyed, and data were collected from 1147 (93.3%). Most pharmacies were urban (98.7%) and part of a chain (66.2%) (Table 1). Pharmacist-furnished naloxone was available at 23.5% (95% CI, 21.0%-26.0%) of pharmacies. Differences by urbanity were not statistically significant, although rural pharmacies were underrepresented. There was a significant difference by pharmacy type, with 31.6% (95% CI, 28.3%-35.1%) of chain pharmacies compared with 7.5% (95% CI, 5.1%-10.6%) of independent pharmacies furnishing naloxone (P < .001).

Table 1. Availability of Naloxone Without a Physician’s Prescription in California Pharmaciesa.

No. (%) [95% CI] P Valuec
All Pharmacies Pharmacist-Furnished Naloxone Availableb Pharmacist-Furnished Naloxone Not Available
Overall 1147 (100.0) 269 (23.5) [21.0-26.0] 878 (76.5) [74.0-79.0]
Pharmacy type
Chain 759 (66.2) [63.4-68.9] 240 (31.6) [28.3-35.1] 519 (68.4) [64.9-71.7] <.001
Independent 388 (33.8) [31.1-36.6] 29 (7.5) [5.1-10.6] 359 (92.5) [89.4-94.9]
Settingd
Urban/urban cluster 1132 (98.7) [97.9-99.3] 263 (23.2) [20.8-25.8] 869 (76.8) [74.1-79.2] .13
Rural 15 (1.3) [0.7-2.2] 6 (40) [16.3-67.7] 9 (60) [32.3-83.7]
a

There were 1209 sampled pharmacies available for inclusion. Data were not collected from 62 sampled pharmacies for the following reasons: closed door (n = 33), permanently closed (n = 6), specialty pharmacy (n = 5), medical supply (n = 5), no contact after 3 attempts (n = 4), part of closed health center (n = 3), no working telephone number (n = 2), pet pharmacy (n = 2), mail order (n = 1), and telepharmacy (n = 1).

b

Survey question: “I heard that you can get naloxone from a pharmacy without a prescription from your doctor. Can I do that at your pharmacy?”

c

By Pearson χ2 test for independence.

d

Urbanity was determined using the 2010 Census of Population and Housing.6

Among pharmacies furnishing naloxone (n = 269), 225 (83.6%) offered a nasal formulation (Table 2). Fourteen (5.2%) offered combination buprenorphine-naloxone tablets used for treatment of opioid use disorder, not opioid overdose. Of pharmacies furnishing naloxone, 50.6% had nasal naloxone in stock. Chain pharmacies were significantly more likely to have nasal naloxone in stock (52.3%; 95% CI, 46.3%-59.4%) compared with independents (31.0%; 95% CI, 15.3%-50.8%) (P = .03). Regarding insurance billing, 59.9% of pharmacies replied correctly that pharmacist-furnished naloxone could be billed, with no significant difference by pharmacy type. The median cash price of nasal naloxone (pack of 2) at chain pharmacies was $136 (IQR, $120-$143.50) compared with $150 (IQR, $138.50-$170) (P = .04) at independents.

Table 2. Characteristics of Naloxone Without a Physician’s Prescription in California Pharmaciesa.

Characteristics Estimate P Valueb
Pharmacies offering pharmacist-furnished naloxone, No. (%) [95% CI] (n = 269)
Nasal naloxone offered 225 (83.6) [78.7-87.9]
Auto-injector offered 19 (7.1) [4.3-10.8]
Other formulations offeredc 70 (26.0) [20.9-31.7]
Nasal naloxone in stock 136 (50.6) [44.4-56.7]
Chain (n = 240) 127 (52.3) [46.3-59.4] .03
Independent (n = 29) 9 (31.0) [15.3-50.8]
Able to bill insurance 161 (59.9) [53.7-65.8]
Chain (n = 240) 143 (59.6) [53.1-65.8] .64
Independent (n = 29) 18 (62.1) [42.3-79.3]
Pharmacies providing cost information (n = 203)
Cash cost of nasal formulation, median (IQR), $ 136 (123.5-146)
Chain (n = 184) 136 (120-143.5) .04
Independent (n = 19) 150 (138.5-170)

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

a

Survey questions: “What formulations of naloxone are available?”; “What is the cost if I want to pay cash?”; “Can you bill insurance for this?”; “Do you have Narcan nasal spray in stock right now?”

b

By Pearson χ2 test for independence.

c

Fourteen pharmacies (5.2% of 269) offered buprenorphine-naloxone combination products as a potential formulation option.

A number of erroneous statements were made by respondents, including that naloxone was a controlled substance, that a tablet formulation was available, and that injectable formulations not appropriate for layperson use were available.

Discussion

Two years after implementation, only 23.5% of a representative sample of California retail pharmacies were furnishing naloxone to patients without a physician prescription. Reasons the practice was not being implemented may include lack of knowledge of legislation, lack of required training, stigma about substance use disorder, and time.4,5 With only 50.6% of pharmacies stocking nasal naloxone, patients may face a delay in access to the drug.

Limitations include low rural pharmacy representation, inclusion of nonpharmacist respondents, absence of data on reasons why pharmacies were not furnishing naloxone, and restriction to California, although most states have some form of pharmacy-based naloxone distribution. Over the last 2 years, the Board of Pharmacy has provided naloxone training to more than 700 of California’s 40 000 pharmacists. Whether naloxone will become more available with training of additional pharmacists and implementation of standardized policies by pharmacy chains needs to be studied.

Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Deputy Editor.

References

  • 1.Walley AY, Xuan Z, Hackman HH, et al. . Opioid overdose rates and implementation of overdose education and nasal naloxone distribution in Massachusetts: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McDonald R, Strang J. Are take-home naloxone programmes effective? systematic review utilizing application of the Bradford Hill criteria. Addiction. 2016;111(7):1177-1187. doi: 10.1111/add.13326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.California State Board of Pharmacy Protocol for pharmacists furnishing naloxone hydrochloride. https://www.pharmacy.ca.gov/publications/naloxone_protocol.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2018.
  • 4.Thompson EL, Rao PSS, Hayes C, Purtill C. Dispensing naloxone without a prescription: survey evaluation of Ohio pharmacists [published online February 25, 2018]. J Pharm Pract. doi: 10.1177/0897190018759225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bakhireva LN, Bautista A, Cano S, Shrestha S, Bachyrycz AM, Cruz TH. Barriers and facilitators to dispensing of intranasal naloxone by pharmacists. Subst Abus. December 5, 2017:1-11. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1391924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.US Census Bureau 2010 Census of Population and Housing, Population and Housing Unit Counts, CPH-2-6, California Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2012. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-6.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2018.

Articles from JAMA are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES