Skip to main content
Wellcome Open Research logoLink to Wellcome Open Research
. 2018 Oct 29;3:135. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14867.1

Tissue and host species-specific transcriptional changes in models of experimental visceral leishmaniasis

Helen Ashwin 1, Karin Seifert 2, Sarah Forrester 1, Najmeeyah Brown 1, Sandy MacDonald 3, Sally James 3, Dimitris Lagos 1, Jon Timmis 4, Jeremy Mottram 1, Simon L Croft 2, Paul M Kaye 1,a
PMCID: PMC6248268  PMID: 30542664

Abstract

Background: Human visceral leishmaniasis, caused by infection with Leishmania donovani or L. infantum, is a potentially fatal disease affecting 50,000-90,000 people yearly in 75 disease endemic countries, with more than 20,000 deaths reported. Experimental models of infection play a major role in understanding parasite biology, host-pathogen interaction, disease pathogenesis, and parasite transmission. In addition, they have an essential role in the identification and pre-clinical evaluation of new drugs and vaccines. However, our understanding of these models remains fragmentary. Although the immune response to Leishmania donovani infection in mice has been extensively characterized, transcriptomic analysis capturing the tissue-specific evolution of disease has yet to be reported.

Methods: We provide an analysis of the transcriptome of spleen, liver and peripheral blood of BALB/c mice infected with L. donovani. Where possible, we compare our data in murine experimental visceral leishmaniasis with transcriptomic data in the public domain obtained from the study of L. donovani-infected hamsters and patients with human visceral leishmaniasis. Digitised whole slide images showing the histopathology in spleen and liver are made available via a dedicated website, www.leishpathnet.org.

Results: Our analysis confirms marked tissue-specific alterations in the transcriptome of infected mice over time and identifies previously unrecognized parallels and differences between murine, hamster and human responses to infection. We show commonality of interferon-regulated genes whilst confirming a greater activation of type 2 immune pathways in infected hamsters compared to mice. Cytokine genes and genes encoding immune checkpoints were markedly tissue specific and dynamic in their expression, and pathways focused on non-immune cells reflected tissue specific immunopathology. Our data also addresses the value of measuring peripheral blood transcriptomics as a potential window into underlying systemic disease. 

Conclusions: Our transcriptomic data, coupled with histopathologic analysis of the tissue response, provide an additional resource to underpin future mechanistic studies and to guide clinical research.

Keywords: Leishmania, infection, host response, transcriptomics, immunopathology

Introduction

Of the many diseases associated with infection by the protozoan parasite Leishmania, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) represents one of the most challenging to understand in terms of its pathophysiology. Unlike cutaneous leishmaniasis, where parasite growth and the pathological consequences of the ensuing immune response are largely confined to the site of transmission, VL is characterized by systemic spread of parasites, multi-organ involvement and a systemic response that is fatal without treatment. Systemic cytokine mediated immunosuppression 1, 2, T cell functional defects 37, alterations to the structural integrity of the lymphoid tissue 810 and systemic coagulopathies 11, 12 have all been proposed as mechanisms that promote parasite survival, render the host susceptible to concomitant secondary infections and/or act as negative prognostic markers. Evidence from animal models suggests that tissue specific control over immunity and immunopathology also exists, that may in part reflect extremes within the clinical spectrum of VL 13, 14. In spite of the broad impact of infection on a range of key physiological processes, a systems-wide appreciation of the underlying immune, metabolic and physiological changes associated with VL has yet to emerge.

Over the past several years, transcriptomic profiling has been adopted as a key methodology for generating an unbiased view of many disease processes. The application of transcriptomic profiling has provided valuable insights into the pathogenesis of many infectious and non-infectious diseases 1526, and on the response to drugs, vaccines and other immunotherapeutic interventions 2731. From a clinical perspective, the application of whole blood transcriptomic profiling (WBTP) opened a new era in clinical monitoring of disease, fuelled notably by the work of Chaussebel and others that illustrated its potential to provide insights into systemic disease processes and serve as a clinical tool 19, 3234. Nevertheless, whether WBTP provides information reflecting a subset of systemic events or is an avatar of that response remains to be fully determined. Indeed, studies formally comparing whole blood with the systemic tissue transcriptome are rare 21.

Transcriptomic profiling in leishmaniasis has been limited to date. In human disease, this has largely focused on cutaneous leishmaniasis 3537. A single study has reported on transcriptional changes in the draining lymph node of Sudanese patients with VL before and after treatment with sodium stibogluconate, identifying a potential role for nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)-regulated immune responses in treatment response 38. One study has examined whole blood transcriptional responses in healthy controls versus asymptomatic and symptomatic VL patients in Brazil 39. Three studies have evaluated transcriptional changes in the spleen of hamsters infected with L. donovani 4042. Here, we have applied transcriptional profiling to address key aspects of the tissue specific response to L. donovani infection in mice. We describe key differences between immune response and metabolic events occurring in the principal target organs of liver and spleen, as well as in blood, and where possible through publically available data, provide a formal comparison between the splenic response in mice and hamsters and between murine and human whole blood.

Methods

Ethics statement

Experiments were approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Review Bodies of the University of York and the LSHTM and the work was performed under UK Home Office license (PPL 60/4377; PPL 70/6997; PPL 70/8207). Mice were killed by cervical dislocation prior to tissue collection, as described below.

Mice and infections

6-8-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River, Margate, UK) weighing 20±1 gm and health screened to FELASA 67M standard and mantained under specific pathogen free conditions in individually ventilated cages were used in this study. Leishmania donovani (LV9) parasites were maintained in B6. Rag1 -/- mice and amastigotes prepared following tissue disruption, cell lysis and differential centrifugation, as described elsewhere 43. 2x10 7 amastigotes in 150 μl RPMI were injected intravenously (i.v.) via the lateral tail vein and without anaesthetic to initiate infection. After infection, mice were allocated to cages of 5 and provided food and water ad libitum. Experiments reported here are derived from two cohorts of mice (designated CRACK-IT_1 and CRACK-IT_2; 20 mice per cohort, n=5 per infection time point and for time-matched uninfected controls). In CRACK-IT_1, mice (n=5) were killed by cervical dislocation at day 15, 17 and 21 post infection. Control naïve mice were killed on the equivalent of day 14 p.i. for logistical reasons. In CRACK-IT_2, infected mice (n=5 per group) were killed at day 36 and 42, alongside a control naïve group. All animals were killed and processed over an approximate time period of 4-6h beginning in the morning. Tissues were aseptically removed post mortem and stored/processed as detailed below. All downstream tissue analysis was performed blinded to group by investigators not involved in animal handling.

Histology and quantitative morphometry

Spleens and livers were embedded in OCT, snap frozen and stored at -80°, before preparing 7 µm cryosections. All subsequent steps were carried out at room temperature. For gross morphology, sections were fixed for 5 minutes in ice-cold acetone and rehydrated by immersion for 2–3 minutes in 90% ethanol, 70% ethanol and finally ddH 2O. Sections were transferred to Harris’s haematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) for 5 minutes, then ‘blued’ in running tap water for 5 minutes. Slides were differentiated using 1% acid alcohol for 5 seconds, washed in tap water for 3minutes and stained with 1% w/v eosin (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) in distilled water for 3 minutes. Slides were washed for 3 minutes in ddH 2O and dehydrated through alcohols, cleared in Xylene and mounted in DPX.

For immunohistochemistry, sections were fixed for 5 minutes in ice cold acetone and rehydrated for 2 x 5 minutes in wash buffer (0.05% w/v BSA in PBS) and blocked for 30 minutes in dilution buffer (5% v/v goat serum in wash buffer). After washing, sections were stained for 45 min with AlexaFlour 647-F4/80 or isotype control (BioLegend, USA; 1:500), counterstained with DAPI and mounted in Prolong Gold. Sections were examined using a Zeiss Axio Scan Z1 with a x 20 objective. Granuloma size and distribution was quantified using image analysis software TissueQuest 4.0 (TissueGnostics, Vienna, Austria), blind to treatment group. DAPI was used as the master channel to identify all events within the regions of interest, and clustering of F4/80 + cells was used to identify granulomas. All granulomas within a 1mm 2 region of interest were identified as individual sub regions of interest, and size and cell density was recorded.

Tissue transcriptomics

RNA was isolated from tissue/blood samples and amplified via Agilent low-input Quick Amp labelling kit (Agilent Technologies). Amplified RNA was then assayed with Agilent SurePrint G3 mouse GE 8x60k microarray chips that were scanned with an Agilent C Scanner with Surescan High Resolution Technology (Agilent Technologies). The data were normalized using the percentile shift method to the 75 th percentile. Comparison of the gene expression data between infected and naïve samples was performed using the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction 44. This analysis was performed with GeneSpring software (version 9; Agilent) as a standard 5% FDR, with the variances assessed by the software for each t test performed. A 2-fold expression criteria was then applied to each gene list. For DE analysis in CRACK-IT_1, a single group of naïve mice were killed at d14 for comparison with samples of infected mice taken at d15, d17 and d21 p.i. For CRACK-IT_2, DE analysis was performed using matched naïve samples for each tissue taken at each time point (see Results).

Gene ontology analysis was performed using GeneSpring (Agilent), and pathway analysis was conducted using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (Ingenuity Systems). For the identification of upstream regulators in IPA, we used the z score, which reflects the extent to which known target genes are regulated in the expected direction, whereby positive z scores predict activation of the regulator whereas negative z scores predict inhibition of the regulator. z scores of >2 and <-2 are considered significant. GSEA 34 was performed to identify enriched gene sets associated with each phenotype (i.e. infected at each time point vs. naïve). Data were collapsed to gene set against an Agilent mouse array chip file (~24K genes) and parameters set for GSEA were: permutations =1000; permutations type = gene set (sample n<7) or phenotype (sample n>7). Putative protein-protein interactions were identified using STRING 45. Interferon-inducible genes were identified using Interferome v2.0 46. Venn diagrams were generated using Venny 2.1 47. Hamster transcriptomic datasets were from 41. Human transcriptomic data sets were from 39.

Results

Splenic response to L. donovani infection in BALB/c mice

As part of a larger program of research aimed at evaluating multiple aspects of EVL (the CRACK-IT VIDR project; see Discussion), we infected two cohorts of female BALB/c mice with 2x10 7 amastigotes of L. donovani (CRACK-IT_1 and CRACK-IT_2) and at defined time points corresponding to increased parasite load and architectural changes in the splenic microenvironment ( Figure 1), spleen tissues were processed for genome-wide transcriptomic profiling by microarray. An overview of the expression data is presented as volcano plots and heat maps for naïve mice (total n=15) and infected mice (total n=25) examined at each time post infection (p.i.) ( Figure 2A and B). To account for minor variations between groups of naïve mice used in the two experiments, differentially expressed (DE) genes were identified by reference to time- and experiment-matched naïve controls ( Figure 2B). Using a mean FDR adjusted p value cut-off of 0.05 and a FC of 2 (Log 2FC = 1) for at least one of the infection time points, 9634 probes were scored as DE across the entire time series ( Table S1). The number of DE probes increased over time, peaking at d36 p.i. (d15: 1997 probes, Log 2FC -3.52 to +5.82; d17: 2826 probes, log 2FC -4.01 to +6.37; d21: 5124 probes, Log 2FC -4.54 to +7.59; d36: 5051 probes, Log 2FC -6.45 to +8.36; d42: 4946 probes, Log 2FC -6.30 to +7.13).

Figure 1. Splenic response to L. donovani infection.

Figure 1.

Spleens from BALB/c mice infected with L. donovani were removed at 15-, 17-, 21-, 36- and 42-days post infection, along with spleens from naïve age matched controls. A. Parasite burdens were determined by impression smears and are represented as mean LDU ± SE (n=5 mice per time point). B. Spleen weight for naïve and infected mice (mg ± SE). CH. Representative histology of spleens from naïve mice ( C and D) and from d17 ( E and F) and d42 ( G and H) infected mice. Hematoxylin and Eosin x20 ( C, E and G) and x40 ( D, F and H); scale bars 50 µm. Blue arrows highlight parasite clusters. G and H show increased frequency of megakaryocytes, indicative of extramedullary haematopoiesis. Data are pooled from two independent experiments covering the early and late phase of infection.

Figure 2. Transcriptomic profiling of spleen response to L. donovani infection in BALB/c mice.

Figure 2.

A. Volcano plots showing DE probes at each time point of infection (relative to matched naïve control mice). Data are shown as Log2 FC in expression against Log10 adjusted p value. B. Heat map of probe expression intensity across time series. Data are pooled for n=5 mice per group for clarity. Vertical blue trace indicates mean intensity signal. Sample “naïve 0” was used to calculate DE genes for days 15, 17 and 21 p.i. Samples “naïve 36” and “naïve 42” were used to calculate DE genes for their respective time points p.i.

After removal of multiple probes, 5096 annotated genes were identified within this DE probe set across all time points (d15, 1078 genes; d17, 1653 genes; d21, 2880 genes; d36, 2708; d42, 2805). To determine if genes related to specific biological responses were differentially regulated over time of infection, we used gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) 34. As shown in Figure 3A, Table 1 and Table S2, the most commonly enriched gene sets across the time course were interferon gamma signalling, TNF signalling, hypoxia, myogenesis, allograft rejection, IL-6 – JAK/STAT signalling, angiogenesis, coagulation, G2M checkpoint, inflammatory response, oestrogen response, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, E2F targets, KRAS signalling and complement. These changes occurred concurrently with loss of red pulp/white pulp differentiation and the onset of extramedullary haematopoiesis (as evident from the abundance of splenic megakaryocytes; Figure 1G and H).

Figure 3. Characteristics of the spleen transcriptomic response to L. donovani infection in BALB/c mice.

Figure 3.

A. Data were subjected to GSEA with reference to MSigDB Hallmark gene sets and normalized enrichment score over time is shown in a radar plot for the top 25 gene sets (from NES values of 0–3.5). Days post infection are indicated by coloured lines (d15, dark blue; d17, red; d21, grey; d36, yellow, d46 light blue). B. IPA-predicted upstream regulators presented as a heat map based on z scores ranging from -9 (negative regulators) to +9 (positive regulators). C. IPA mechanistic pathway analysis indicating the 16 linked regulatory proteins, that together are predicted to regulate ~14% of all DE genes in the L. donovani infected spleen. D. Venn diagram showing distribution of 1645 Type I and II Interferon-induced genes, as identified using Interferome v2.01. E. Predicted Trim24 targets identified in IPA that show upregulated expression during infection.

Table 1. Summary of enriched gene sets in the spleen of L. donovani-infected BALB/c mice.

Data was subjected to GSEA against the MSigDB
Hallmark gene set and represents a summary of the
top 10 gene sets (by FDR) for each time point. For full
dataset including gene lists, see S2Table. Normalised
enrichment scores for all gene sets listed for all time
points are shown in Figure 3A.
day 15 day 17 day 21 day 36 day 42
Gene Set Name FDR q-value
HALLMARK_KRAS_SIGNALING_UP 7.80E-09 3.07E-11 2.70E-24 1.63E-20
HALLMARK_KRAS_SIGNALING_DN 2.67E-08
HALLMARK_ALLOGRAFT_REJECTION 1.15E-07 8.95E-10 9.97E-27
HALLMARK_IL6_JAK_STAT3_SIGNALING 2.48E-07
HALLMARK_INTERFERON_GAMMA_RESPONSE 2.40E-06 7.24E-26 1.07E-22 2.75E-40 1.88E-27
HALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_EARLY 9.16E-06
HALLMARK_INFLAMMATORY_RESPONSE 9.16E-06 3.07E-11 1.13E-19 4.08E-25 8.69E-23
HALLMARK_ANGIOGENESIS 1.06E-05
HALLMARK_COAGULATION 1.77E-05 1.90E-23
HALLMARK_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION 3.20E-05 4.76E-13 1.13E-19 1.52E-18 3.09E-21
HALLMARK_INTERFERON_ALPHA_RESPONSE 1.26E-12
HALLMARK_HYPOXIA 1.26E-12 3.81E-20 3.38E-25
HALLMARK_MYOGENESIS 1.26E-12
HALLMARK_G2M_CHECKPOINT 3.07E-11 1.50E-36 1.96E-24
HALLMARK_TNFA_SIGNALING_VIA_NFKB 4.32E-09 2.37E-30 6.38E-26
HALLMARK_E2F_TARGETS 1.50E-36 1.63E-20
HALLMARK_MITOTIC_SPINDLE 1.13E-19
HALLMARK_IL2_STAT5_SIGNALING 6.16E-19 1.18E-22
HALLMARK_UV_RESPONSE_DN 2.57E-17
HALLMARK_XENOBIOTIC_METABOLISM 1.54E-14
HALLMARK_COMPLEMENT 4.08E-25 9.69E-20
HALLMARK_ESTROGEN_RESPONSE_LATE 1.54E-14 5.18E-22

We next used pathway analysis to look in more detail at the evolution of and the main upstream regulators of the DE genes identified at each time point post infection. Comparative analysis within Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) indicated that IFN γ, LPS, IL-1β, TLR4, TNF and STAT1 were amongst the highest scoring and significant upstream regulators predicted to be activated during infection (with activation z scores ranging from 2.89 to 9.5 and p values from ~10 -5 to 10 -48), whereas IL-10RA and TRIM24 were upstream regulators that were predicted to be down regulated (z scores of ~-4 to -9 and p values from 10 -7 to 10 -35; Figure 3B), despite not being DE themselves. For example, at day 36 p.i., activation of IFNγ was predicted by the regulation of 301 target genes, consistent with an observed Log2FC change in expression of 3.474. IFNγ was predicted to interact with 694 genes (or 13.7%) of all DE genes via a mechanistic network involving 15 other regulators ( Figure 3C). Similarly, using the Interferome database which contains expression data related to ~4000 interferon regulated genes (v2.01; 46), 32.3% (1645/5096) of all DE genes scored as interferon inducible, of which 743 and 431 scored as uniquely regulated by Type I and II (IFNγ) interferons, respectively ( Figure 3D). In contrast, IL-10RA and TRIM24 were predicted to be inhibited based on the expression change of 108 and 41 genes, respectively. The 41 genes that predict inactivation of TRIM24 during L. donovani infection are shown in Figure 3E.

Finally, we examined expression of cytokine and chemokine genes as well as genes for their respective receptors, to provide a high-level view of immune pathways activated during infection in this target tissue ( Figure 4). Cytokines with increased mRNA accumulation at all time points included Il10 and Il21, whereas for others (e.g. Il1b and Il6) there was progressive increase in mRNA accumulation over time. Ifnγ mRNA abundance also increased over time post infection, whilst enhanced accumulation of Tnf mRNA was observed only late in infection and other TNF superfamily members showed variable responses. Distinct temporal regulation of chemokine mRNA abundance was also observed. In contrast to chemokine ligands, mRNAs for many chemokine receptors were found at lower abundance in infected mice compared to controls (e.g. Ccr1 and Ccr9), and the same trend was also observed for some cytokine receptors, notably Il17rb, Il17rd and Il17re.

Figure 4. Cytokine and chemokine ligand and receptor gene expression in the spleen of mice infected with L. donovani.

Figure 4.

AC. Heat maps representing Log2 fold change in mRNA abundance for chemokines, interleukins and IFNγ / TNF family members and their receptors are shown. Only genes that were DE for at least one time point post infection are shown. Blue blocks represent down-regulated genes and red blocks indicate up-regulated genes. White blocks represent genes that were not significantly DE at a given time point.

Comparative analysis of splenic response in mice and hamsters infected with L. donovani

In contrast to murine EVL, hamsters infected with L. donovani develop progressive and fatal visceral leishmaniasis, providing a better model of end stage human disease. The heightened sensitivity of hamsters to L. donovani infection has been attributed, in part, to a deficiency in NOS2 production, resulting from a promoter polymorphism similar to that seen in humans 48. In addition, alterations in immune response associated with T cell exhaustion and myeloid cell dysregulation have been reported based on transcriptomic as well as functional analysis 41, 42. However, a detailed comparison of the pathophysiology in infected hamsters and mice has not been conducted. We made use of recently published RNA-Seq data derived from the spleens of hamsters infected with L. donovani infection 41 to compare these two infection models, albeit with the caveat that different technologies were used for measuring mRNA abundance. Kong et al. observed 4360 DE transcripts at d28 post infection, of which 2340 (53.7%) were up-regulated and 2020 (46.3%) were down-regulated compared to spleens from naïve hamsters. In comparison, in L. donovani infected mice at the best matched time point in our study (d36 p.i.), we identified 41.2% of DE probes as upregulated and 58.8% as down-regulated ( Table S1). By filtering on FDR and FC (<0.05; >2FC), removing the bottom quartile of hamster genes that were expressed with a cpm of <1 and by averaging across multiple probes/reads, we generated three lists of genes, those DE in hamster and not mouse (1504 genes), DE in mouse and not hamster (2239 genes) and those DE in both (485 genes, Figure 5A and Table S3).

Figure 5. Comparison between DE genes in hamster and mouse spleen.

Figure 5.

DE genes identified in mouse spleen (d36 p.i.; this study) were compared to those identified in 41. A. Venn diagram showing overlap of DE genes. B. Correlation plot of Log2FC for mouse and hamster DE genes. CF. STRING analysis of predicted protein interactions for DE genes identified as upregulated in both mouse and hamster ( C; yellow = cell cycle, blue = immune response), down-regulated in mouse and hamster ( D; red = anatomical structure, blue = vascular development), up-regulated in hamster only ( E; yellow = negative regulation, blue = immune system), and down-regulated in hamster only ( F; green = regulation of multicellular processes, red = complex of collagen fibres, yellow = drug metabolism, blue = serine proteases trypsin domain).

Amongst common DE genes, there were those that were up or down consistently in both species, and in more limited number, some that showed differential expression in alternate directions (35 up in mouse and down in hamster and 37 up in hamster and down in mouse; Figure 5B and Table S3). To further examine these DE gene lists, we used STRING, a protein-protein interaction database 45. We identified no discernible functional pathways associated with the small number of inversely DE genes. Analysis of common upregulated DE genes identified a highly significant enrichment for immune system process (GO:002376; FDR 7.37×10 -23) and cell cycle process (GO:0022402; FDR 2.75×10 -19) related genes ( Figure 5C). Amongst common down-regulated DE genes, there was a significant enrichment in GO terms related to changes in morphology, pathways for anatomical structure morphogenesis (GO:0009653; FDR 3.22×10 -14) and vascular development (GO:0001944; 1.82×10 -11), the latter including negative regulators of angiogenesis such as Mmrn2 and promoters of angiogenesis such as Vegfa ( Figure 5D). These data are consistent with the notion that the well documented changes in vasculature associated with murine infection 9 also occur during hamster infection.

Amongst DE genes upregulated only in infected hamsters, GO pathways related to negative regulation (e.g. GO: 0048519; FDR 1.13×10 -7) and immune system processes (e.g. GO:0002376; FDR 2.1×10 -7) predominated ( Figure 5E). Most notable amongst the top 25 up regulated genes were Ido1, a potent negative regulator of immune responses (245-fold upregulated) and Arg1, associated with Th2-associated cytokines (36-fold upregulated). Surprisingly, Il10 was not upregulated in splenic tissue. In contrast, DE genes downregulated in hamsters only related to morphogenesis and organismal processes (e.g. GO:0051239: FDR 5.78×10 -9), complexes of collagen trimers (GO:0098644; FDR 3.4×10 -11), drug metabolism (KEGG:00983; FDR 7.94×10 -8) and serine proteases, trypsin domain (IPR001254; FDR 0.00741). Of the top 25 down-regulated genes, 10 encoded amylase or amylase precursor proteins and 10 have serine peptidase activity ( Table S3).

Amongst DE genes upregulated only in murine infection, genes associated with GO terms related to host defence and immune response again predominated (e.g. GO:0006955; FDR 2.03×10 -10; GO:0006952; FDR 4.96×10 -10). Notable amongst the top 25 upregulated genes were Ptgs2 (or Cox-2), a key enzyme in the pathway leading to prostaglandin synthesis (124-fold upregulated), Tff1, associated with chronic inflammation (75-fold upregulated), Ctsg, thought to promote excessive inflammation (33-fold upregulated) and the neutrophil related proteins Lcn2 and Ngp (19.7 and 24.3-fold upregulated respectively). Notable in the top 25 downregulated genes were Cd27 (langerin; 23-fold downregulated), the sodium voltage gated channel encoding Scn3a (18-fold down regulated), Cd209c (SIGNR2; 9-fold), and Il22ra2, a soluble receptor that inhibits IL-22 activity (12.7-fold).

Finally, given its importance to the host response to infection, we examined the status of macrophage activation, and observed a good degree of concordance for M1-associated transcripts (as described in Figure 6 of 41) between hamster and mouse (55% of genes, including Ccl2, Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Ifng, Irf1, Irf7, Irg1, Socs3, Stat1 and Ccr7). In contrast, M2-associated genes were less commonly regulated in mouse compared to hamster spleen (23% of genes listed in Figure 7 of 41, including Ccl2, Cd209a, Cebpb, Chi3l1, and Il1rn). These data are in accord with the above analysis indicating an enhanced Th-2 type inflammation in hamster compared to murine EVL.

Hepatic response to L. donovani infection in BALB/c mice

We adopted a similar approach to examine transcriptional changes in the liver of L. donovani infected mice, where the process of granulomatous inflammation has been well-characterised at the histological level 13, 49, 50. In contrast to the persistent parasite burden observed in the chronically infected spleen, parasite burden was significantly reduced in the liver by d42 p.i. ( Figure 6A). This was commensurate with the development and maturation of host protective granulomas, as indicated by quantitative morphometric analysis of granuloma number and area ( Figure 6B–F) and through observation of H&E stained sections ( Figure 6G–J).

In the infected liver, 16192 probes were scored as DE (>2 FC, 5% FDR) for at least one time point ( Figure 7 and Table S4). As seen in volcano plots ( Figure 7A vs Figure 2A) there was a tendency towards greater fold changes in mRNA accumulation compared to spleen with a bias towards up-regulated genes.

By GSEA analysis, we identified 20-24 hallmark gene sets that were associated with infection over the time course of infection (using a conservative threshold of 5% FDR); these enriched gene sets showed a high level of concordance and included allograft rejection, inflammatory response, IFNγ and IFNα signalling, TNF- , IL-2- and IL-6-related signalling pathways, pathways related to cell cycle, apoptosis, and complement Several were also found associated with the response to infection in the spleen ( Table 1 and Figure 8). There was, however, liver-specific enrichment for hallmark gene sets representing regulation of Kras signalling, epithelial and mesenchyme transition, angiogenesis, notch signalling and apical junction and apical surface. The latter are likely to reflect underlying changes in hepatocytes, which although not grossly abnormal in structure in H&E sections, may nevertheless have an important role in liver pathophysiology during disease 51.

Figure 6. Hepatic response to L. donovani infection.

Figure 6.

Livers from BALB/c mice infected with L. donovani were removed at 15-, 17-, 21-, 36- and 42-days post infection. A. Parasite burdens were determined from impression smears and are represented as mean LDUs ± SEM. B. Granuloma density (mm 2; green squares) and average granuloma size (µm 2; yellow squares) are shown per mouse and with group mean. CF. Distribution plot of granuloma size (ranging from 150 µm 2 to 6140 µm 2) for 15, 21, 36 and 42 days p.i. respectively. Inset shows representative granulomas identified using TissueQuest, with F4/80 staining (red) and attributed size in µm 2. GJ. Granuloma morphology at 15, 21, 36 and 42 days p.i. respectively. H&E x40 magnification; scale bars 50 µm. Blue arrows indicate amastigote clusters. Dashed line denotes granuloma perimeter.

Figure 7. Transcriptomic profiling of hepatic response to L. donovani infection in BALB/c mice.

Figure 7.

A. Volcano plots showing DE probes at each time point of infection (relative to matched naïve control mice). Data are shown as Log2 FC in expression against Log10 adjusted p value. B. Heat map of probe expression intensity across time series. Data are pooled for n=5 mice per group for clarity. Vertical blue trace indicates mean intensity signal. Sample “naïve 0” was used to calculate DE genes for days 15, 17 and 21 p.i. Samples “naïve 36” and “naïve 42” were used to calculate DE genes for their respective time points p.i.

Figure 8. Comparison between hepatic and splenic responses to L. donovani by GSEA.

Figure 8.

Data were subjected to GSEA with reference to MSigDB Hallmark gene sets and normalized enrichment score (NES) over time is shown as a heat map for significant gene sets enriched in liver spleen and blood at the state time points.

mRNA accumulation for genes associated with cytokines, chemokines and their associated receptors were also compared over time ( Figure 9). In general, the breadth and intensity of response seen in the liver was greater than in the spleen, a result at least in part due to the greater change in cellular composition between resting and inflamed liver compared to resting and inflamed spleen. Of note, for many cytokines and chemokines, day 36 represented the peak of the response, with reduced mRNA accumulation at day 42 associated with the reduction in parasite load seen at this time ( Figure 6).

Figure 9. Cytokine and chemokine ligand and receptor gene expression in the liver of mice infected with L. donovani.

Figure 9.

AC. Heat maps representing Log2 fold change in mRNA abundance for chemokines, interleukins and IFNγ / TNF family members and their receptors are shown. Only genes that were DE for at least one time point post infection are shown. Blue blocks represent down-regulated genes and red blocks indicate up-regulated genes. White blocks represent genes that were not significantly DE at a given time point.

Finally, we examined the expression of inhibitory receptors associated with T cell exhaustion 5, 52, 53, to determine whether expression at the whole tissue level provided any clues as to the rate of cure for L. donovani infection seen in these two organs ( Figure 10). Inhibitory receptors were more prominently associated with the hepatic response, again likely reflecting the more dramatic increase in relative T cell frequency in liver vs. spleen. In spleen, Lag3 was the only inhibitory receptor that remained elevated over the entire course of infection. Of note, similar to mouse spleen, Lag3 was also significantly upregulated in hamster spleen whereas Havcr2 (Tim-3) was also significantly down-regulated ( Table S3).

Figure 10. Expression of immune checkpoint genes in the spleen and liver of mice infected with L. donovani.

Figure 10.

Heat map representing Log2 fold change in mRNA abundance for immune checkpoint genes in spleen and liver of L. donovani-infected BALB/c mice. Only genes that were DE for at least one time point and at least one organ are shown. Blue blocks represent down-regulated genes and red blocks indicate up-regulated genes. White blocks represent genes that were not significantly DE at a given time point.

Whole blood transcriptional response to L. donovani infection.

As whole blood is the most accessible target tissue for transcriptomic profiling in humans and previous work had suggested that whole blood signatures might be useful avatars of the systemic response, we compared the response between spleen, liver and blood. 26,836 probes (12348 annotated genes) were identified as DE (FDR 0.05, FC2) in at least one time point ( Table S5). By GSEA analysis blood was, not surprisingly, more similar to spleen than liver ( Figure 8). We next took advantage of a recently published whole blood transcriptomic analysis 39 to compare responses across murine EVL and human VL. Using day 36-infected mice as a comparator, our results suggest a high divergence in whole blood response between EVL and human VL ( Figure 11).

Figure 11. Comparison of whole blood transcriptome in murine EVL and human VL.

Figure 11.

A and B. Murine whole blood data from day 36 p.i. was re-analysed with a cut off of log2FC= 1.5 to make comparable with the human data presented in 39. Venn diagram indicates a minimal overlap between DE genes that are up regulated ( A) and down-regulated ( B) during infection. C and D. STRING analysis of the common up-regulated ( C) and down-regulated ( D) genes. E and F. Most significant (by FDR) GO terms and Kegg pathways associated with mouse and human specific up-regulated ( E) and down-regulated ( F) genes, generated by STRING.

Identification of common response signature in spleen, liver and blood during murine L. donovani infection

Finally, we asked whether it was possible to identify a common response signature found in all tissues that might act as a biomarker of infection and which, when measured in blood might reflect or predict systemic disease. When analysed for genes that were DE at all time points in all tissues, we did not identify any genes that were significantly down regulated in expression. In contrast, 26 genes were consistently and significantly up-regulated across blood, spleen and liver at all times p.i in murine EVL ( Figure 12). These genes, of which 25/26 (96%) are interferon responsive, clustered in STRING analysis around 2 nodes ( Cxcl9 and Gbp1: Figure 12B and C) and reflected a significant enrichment for GO TERMS including “cellular response to interferon-beta” (GO:0035458, FDR 7.19×10 -8), “defence response to protozoans” (GO:0042832, FDR 7.22×10 -8), “immune response” (GO:0006955, FDR 9.71×10 -8), and symbiont containing vacuole” (GO:0020003, FDR 2.15×10 -9). The gene set also contained 3 apolipoprotein L genes ( Apol10a, Apol10b and Apol11b) which are phylogenetically related amongst the 12 members of the murine Apolipoprotein L family 54. Of note, 19/26 (73%) genes in this signature were also upregulated in hamster spleen ( Figure 12B), whereas 6/26 (23%) were upregulated in human whole blood 39. Common to all data sets were genes encoding IFNγ, the CD20-like antigen membrane spanning 4-domains A6A (MS4A6A/ Ms4a6d), and the interferon-inducible genes guanylate binding protein 2 (GBP2/ Gbp2), suppressor of cytokine signalling (SOCS1/ Socs1) and tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase (WARS/ Wars).

Figure 12. A 26-gene transcriptional signature is present in blood, spleen and liver throughout the course of L. donovani infection in BALB/c mice.

Figure 12.

A. Venn diagram showing relationship between genes consistently up-regulated across time in blood, spleen and liver. B. Heat map showing expression over time for the 26 gene signature in each tissue. Data are shown as Log2FC, indicated by the scale bar. Asterisks denote that genes were also upregulated in the spleen of hamsters infected for 28 days (data from 41.) C. STRING analysis of the 26-gene signature indicates two hub genes ( Cxcl9 and Gbp1) forming a network that encompasses 21/26 (81%) of these genes.

Discussion

The immune response to L. donovani infection has been extensively analysed using a wide array of technologies, including use of gene KO mice, advanced imaging techniques and cell/cytokine manipulations 5, 8, 50, 5557. Yet a comprehensive picture of the dynamic complexity of the host response has not previously been reported. Here, we provide data from a detailed transcriptional analysis of the response of BALB/c mice to L. donovani infection and compare this where possible to existing data sets from other species, including humans. This high-level overview of transcriptional changes associated with infection poses a number of important questions and provides an important additional data resource for the leishmaniasis research community.

BALB/c mice were chosen for this study due to their extensive use as an immunological model of infection and as a tool for the pre-clinical evaluation of drugs and vaccines 5861. In this and most other mouse strains on a Slc11a1 (Nramp1) mutant background, hepatic infection is self-resolving and associated with the development of granulomatous inflammation, whereas splenic parasite load persists, often for several months, accompanied by marked alterations to organ microarchitecture 13. We selected time points when hepatic and splenic parasite burden were increasing and also to reflect the time frame over which a dichotomy in host resistance becomes apparent in spleen and liver. Where possible, we have also mined existing data to look for similarities and/or differences in transcriptional response. Whilst these comparisons are informative, some degree of caution needs to be exerted on their interpretation. Platforms used for analysis of transcriptomic changes differ (Agilent gene arrays, Illumina Bead Chip arrays, RNA-Seq) negating quantitative comparison in expression levels, variables such as tissue parasite load and time of infection are difficult to standardise (particularly for human disease), and with the exception of our study, data is restricted to a single tissue site. Although in some cases our results were unexpected and showed dissimilarity between experimental models and human disease, this should not be taken as an argument against the value of research in such models. Rather, it stresses that once proof-of-concept has been achieved in a model, additional validation based on human data is essential. Furthermore, such human data may form the basis for selecting an appropriate pre-clinical model for the question at hand, or indeed for engineering more refined models of novel aspects of human disease.

Splenic histopathology of infected BALB/c mice, as expected, indicated extensive remodelling of the splenic architecture and the late onset of extramedullary haematopoiesis, similar to that seen in other mouse strains 8. Coincident with these changes, we observed transcriptional signatures associated with the activation of immune responses, angiogenesis and coagulation pathways. Interferon-related pathways were highly dominant. Approximately 13% of the identified DE genes were predicted to be downstream of IFNγ signalling and ~30% of all genes were scored as interferon inducible using the Interferome database 46. IPA identified two candidate negative regulators IL-10Ra and TRIM24. IL-10 signalling through IL-10Ra (CD210) is well recognised for its role in inhibiting immune clearance of Leishmania in mouse models and in humans 1, 2, 7, 6264, operating to directly regulate macrophage activation and also the function and development of IL-10 producing Th1 and Tr1 cells 1, 6366. Therapeutic interventions to target IL-10 mediated immune regulation in human VL have been posited 67. TRIM24 is a bromodomain-containing transcriptional regulator protein that has recently been the focus of attention as a regulator of STAT3 recruitment during oncogenesis 68 and as a positive regulator of Th2 cytokine production in Th2 cells 69. The predicted inhibition of TRIM24 would, therefore, be consistent with a dominant Th1 type immune response during murine EVL. TRIM24 is also observed as a target for inactivation during infection with lab-adapted H1N1influenza A virus 70 and has been shown to be targetable using novel heterobifunctional protein degraders 71, suggesting that pathways controlled by TRIM24 could be further manipulated in favour of host protection.

In contrast to the murine EVL model, data generated by Melby and colleagues suggests that the immune response in hamster EVL favours a more prominent Th2 like response 40, 41. In addition, their analysis also indicates that macrophages in hamster EVL are conditioned to respond to activation with the induction of a program of gene expression that favours amastigote growth, including Arg1, Ido-1 and Irg1 and associated with STAT3 activation 41. We did not observe increased accumulation of Ido1 in murine EVL and a comparison of signature M1 and M2 genes suggested that in murine EVL, M1 activation was favoured. At a tissue level, alternate regulators of inflammation such as Ptsg2 and Il-10 appeared to be favoured in murine EVL. Upregulation of Ptsg2 (Cox2) is consistent with the enhanced production of prostaglandins in spleen cells from mice with L. donovani infection 72 and with the host protective effect of Cox2 inhibition in vivo 73.

There has been considerable recent interest in the potential for host-directed therapies in different forms of leishmaniasis 4, 5, 67, 7477. Of interest, therefore, is how well pre-clinical models may predict novel approaches applicable to human VL. Our analysis showing increased mRNA abundance for a variety of checkpoint inhibitors including CTLA4, PD1, LAG3 and others ( Figure 10) supports the notion that these may be candidates for the development of immunotherapy, along with key suppressive cytokines like IL-10. Some of these checkpoint targets are equally represented in mouse and hamster spleen and human whole blood e.g. LAG3 and CTLA4, whereas others show species restricted regulation. For example, IDO-1 is up regulated in hamster spleen and human whole blood, but not in any mouse tissue examined. Importantly, these diverse data as well as the clear dichotomy of expression at a tissue specific level, indicate the need to build a more comprehensive and uniform knowledge base regarding these pathways in different models and forms of human disease.

Analysis of whole blood has been a valuable tool for monitoring transcriptional changes associated with infection and even for predicting drug efficacy 19, but the relationship between transcriptomic changes in blood and tissue remains poorly understood. Pooling data across all tissues and time points, we were able to identify a 26-gene signature that was common to spleen, liver and blood during murine VL. 96% of these genes have been reported as interferon inducible, and clearly indicate the dominant nature of interferon signalling during murine VL. The clinical value of this signature is however questionable, given the lack of similarity between whole blood transcriptomic responses observed in our study and that of humans with VL in Brazil 39. In a similar study in acute melioidosis, 26.9% of genes were similarly regulated in murine and human infection 21. The reasons for this lack of similarity in VL are likely to be multiple, including the chronicity of infection, difference in pathogen ( L. donovani vs. L. infantum), specific characteristics of Brazilian VL 12 or differing analytical methods. It would be informative, given the above discussion, to compare human whole blood with hamster whole blood to ascertain whether the latter may provide a greater degree of similarity and to understand the extent of temporal and geographic diversity in the transcriptome of patients with VL.

Finally, a deeper understanding of subtleties of the immunopathology of leishmaniasis in different target tissues (e.g. granulomatous vs. non-granulomatous) and their relationship to gene transcriptional changes will require more in-depth analysis than that reported here, using new techniques to integrate image analysis with complex “omics” and other meta data. Such approaches are fuelling significant advances in precision medicine in other fields, notably cancer and neuroscience 7880, but have to date had limited application in the field of infectious disease. To facilitate the development of such approaches in leishmaniasis, we have generated a digital whole slide collection of the tissue sections generated in this study, stained with both H&E and markers to identify myeloid cells (F4/80 and 1A8). These are available via a new network designed to support the development of digital pathology in leishmaniasis ( www.leishpathnet.org), and improve transparency and data sharing. In addition, the data collected from the animals used in this study forms part of a larger program of work (the CRACKIT Virtual Infectious Diseases Research Challenge; https://crackit.org.uk/challenge-16-virtual-infectious-disease-research) that had the goal of generating an in silico model of the immune response during murine EVL, with the aim of reducing the number of animals required for basic research on immune regulation and for evaluating potentially novel therapeutic interventions ( www.leishsim.org).

Data availability

Microarray data is available via the Gene Expression Omnibus (Ascension number GSE113376: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE113376).

OSF: CRACKIT Virtual Infectious Diseases project. Supplementary Table 1Supplementary Table 5 (see information below in Supplementary material) and raw data for Figure 1A and B and Figure 6A–F are available, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9WSDK 81.

Data on OSF are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Whole slide images and individual mouse metadata are available from www.leishpathnet.org (study designations CRACKIT-1 and CRACKIT-2). Requests for access to tissue samples from these studies will be accommodated where possible and subject to availability.

RNA-Seq data from a hamster model of VL is available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE91187

Blood transcription of human infection are available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE77528

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff at the Biological Services Facilities of University of York and LSHTM for their support with animal husbandry.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by a National Centre for Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animal in Research (NC3Rs) / Innovate UK CRACKIT Challenge Award (NC.CO13117 and NC/CO13295 to PMK, SLC, JT and JM), by a UK MRC Programme Grant (G1000230 to PMK) and by a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award (WT104726 to PMK). KS and SLC were also supported by UK MRC (MR/J008702/1).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; referees: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Supplementary material

Supplementary Tables 1–5 are available here: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9WSDK 81

Table S1. 9634 DE probes across time course of L. donovani infection in the spleen of BALB/c mice. Sheet 1 provides the list of 9634 DE probes identified on the basis of FDR of 0.05 and a FC of 2 for at least one infection time point vs naïve control. Sheet 2 provides the collapsed 5096 DE gene list. Expression data are shown as Log2FC.

Table S2. GSEA analysis of DE genes in the spleen of L. donovani infected BALB/c mice. Data in the Summary tab was used to generate Table 1 and Figure 3A.

Table S3. Lists of annotated DE genes in mouse and hamster spleen following L. donovani infection. Gene lists are arranged as DE in both hamster and mouse, hamster DE only and mouse DE only. Expression data are shown as log2FC.

Table S4. 16192 DE probes across time course of L. donovani infection in the liver of BALB/c mice. Sheet 1 provides the list of 16192 DE probes identified on the basis of FDR of 0.05 and a FC of 2 for at least one infection time point vs naïve control. Sheet 2 provides the collapsed 8033 DE gene list. Expression data are shown as Log2FC.

Table S5. 28636 DE probes across time course of L. donovani infection in the blood of BALB/c mice. Sheet 1 provides the list of 28636 DE probes identified on the basis of FDR of 0.05 and a FC of 2 for at least one infection time point vs naïve control. Sheet 2 provides the collapsed 12348 DE gene list. Expression data are shown as Log2FC. Sheet 3 contains DE genes identified by Gardinassi et al. from whole blood of VL patients 39.

References

  • 1. Nylén S, Maurya R, Eidsmo L, et al. : Splenic accumulation of IL-10 mRNA in T cells distinct from CD4 +CD25 + (Foxp3) regulatory T cells in human visceral leishmaniasis. J Exp Med. 2007;204(4):805–17. 10.1084/jem.20061141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gautam S, Kumar R, Maurya R, et al. : IL-10 neutralization promotes parasite clearance in splenic aspirate cells from patients with visceral leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(7):1134–7. 10.1093/infdis/jir461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Faleiro RJ, Kumar R, Hafner LM, et al. : Immune regulation during chronic visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(7):e2914. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gautam S, Kumar R, Singh N, et al. : CD8 T cell exhaustion in human visceral leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(2):290–9. 10.1093/infdis/jit401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Joshi T, Rodriguez S, Perovic V, et al. : B7-H1 blockade increases survival of dysfunctional CD8 + T cells and confers protection against Leishmania donovani infections. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(5):e1000431. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Maurya R, Kumar R, Prajapati VK, et al. : Human visceral leishmaniasis is not associated with expansion or accumulation of Foxp3 + CD4 cells in blood or spleen. Parasite Immunol. 2010;32(7):479–83. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2010.01219.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Montes de Oca M, Kumar R, de Labastida Rivera F, et al. : Blimp-1-Dependent IL-10 Production by Tr1 Cells Regulates TNF-Mediated Tissue Pathology. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(1):e1005398. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ato M, Stager S, Engwerda CR, et al. : Defective CCR7 expression on dendritic cells contributes to the development of visceral leishmaniasis. Nat Immunol. 2002;3(12):1185–91. 10.1038/ni861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dalton JE, Maroof A, Owens BM, et al. : Inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinases restores immunocompetence and improves immune-dependent chemotherapy against experimental leishmaniasis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(4):1204–16. 10.1172/JCI41281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Engwerda CR, Ato M, Cotterell SE, et al. : A role for tumor necrosis factor-alpha in remodeling the splenic marginal zone during Leishmania donovani infection. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(2):429–37. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64199-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Costa CH, Werneck GL, Costa DL, et al. : Is severe visceral leishmaniasis a systemic inflammatory response syndrome? A case control study. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2010;43(4):386–92. 10.1590/S0037-86822010000400010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Costa DL, Rocha RL, Carvalho RM, et al. : Serum cytokines associated with severity and complications of kala-azar. Pathog Glob Health. 2013;107(2):78–87. 10.1179/2047773213Y.0000000078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Engwerda CR, Kaye PM: Organ-specific immune responses associated with infectious disease. Immunol Today. 2000;21(2):73–8. 10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01549-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sanchez MA, Diaz NL, Zerpa O, et al. : Organ-specific immunity in canine visceral leishmaniasis: analysis of symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs naturally infected with Leishmania chagasi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70(6):618–24. 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.70.618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Albuquerque SS, Carret C, Grosso AR, et al. : Host cell transcriptional profiling during malaria liver stage infection reveals a coordinated and sequential set of biological events. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:270. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Berry MP, Blankley S, Graham CM, et al. : Systems approaches to studying the immune response in tuberculosis. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(5):579–87. 10.1016/j.coi.2013.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Berry MP, Graham CM, McNab FW, et al. : An interferon-inducible neutrophil-driven blood transcriptional signature in human tuberculosis. Nature. 2010;466(7309):973–7. 10.1038/nature09247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bloom CI, Graham CM, Berry MP, et al. : Transcriptional blood signatures distinguish pulmonary tuberculosis, pulmonary sarcoidosis, pneumonias and lung cancers. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70630. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chaussabel D: Assessment of immune status using blood transcriptomics and potential implications for global health. Semin Immunol. 2015;27(1):58–66. 10.1016/j.smim.2015.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chiche L, Jourde-Chiche N, Whalen E, et al. : Modular transcriptional repertoire analyses of adults with systemic lupus erythematosus reveal distinct type I and type II interferon signatures. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(6):1583–95. 10.1002/art.38628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Conejero L, Potempa K, Graham CM, et al. : The Blood Transcriptome of Experimental Melioidosis Reflects Disease Severity and Shows Considerable Similarity with the Human Disease. J Immunol. 2015;195(7):3248–61. 10.4049/jimmunol.1500641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Linsley PS, Chaussabel D, Speake C: The Relationship of Immune Cell Signatures to Patient Survival Varies within and between Tumor Types. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138726. 10.1371/journal.pone.0138726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Mejias A, Dimo B, Suarez NM, et al. : Whole blood gene expression profiles to assess pathogenesis and disease severity in infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. PLoS Med. 2013;10(11):e1001549. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pitt JM, Blankley S, Potempa K, et al. : Analysis of Transcriptional Signatures in Response to Listeria monocytogenes Infection Reveals Temporal Changes That Result from Type I Interferon Signaling. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0150251. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tako EA, Hassimi MF, Li E, et al. : Transcriptomic analysis of the host response to Giardia duodenalis infection reveals redundant mechanisms for parasite control. mBio. 2013;4(6):e00660-13. 10.1128/mBio.00660-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhang ZN, Xu JJ, Fu YJ, et al. : Transcriptomic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in rapid progressors in early HIV infection identifies a signature closely correlated with disease progression. Clin Chem. 2013;59(8):1175–86. 10.1373/clinchem.2012.197335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Benet M, Moya M, Donato MT, et al. : A simple transcriptomic signature able to predict drug-induced hepatic steatosis. Arch Toxicol. 2014;88(4):967–82. 10.1007/s00204-014-1197-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Blankley S, Graham CM, Levin J, et al. : A 380-gene meta-signature of active tuberculosis compared with healthy controls. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(6):1873–6. 10.1183/13993003.02121-2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Flanagan KL, Noho-Konteh F, Ghazal P, et al. : Transcriptional profiling technology for studying vaccine responses: an untapped goldmine. Methods. 2013;60(3):269–74. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.03.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Paranavitana C, DaSilva L, Vladimirova A, et al. : Transcriptional profiling of recall responses to Francisella live vaccine strain. Pathog Dis. 2014;70(2):141–52. 10.1111/2049-632X.12113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wang IM, Bett AJ, Cristescu R, et al. : Transcriptional profiling of vaccine-induced immune responses in humans and non-human primates. Microb Biotechnol. 2012;5(2):177–87. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00317.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chaussabel D, Pascual V, Banchereau J: Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics. BMC Biol. 2010;8:84. 10.1186/1741-7007-8-84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. O'Garra A: Systems approach to understand the immune response in tuberculosis: an iterative process between mouse models and human disease. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2013;78:173–7. 10.1101/sqb.2013.78.020172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, et al. : Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–50. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Christensen SM, Dillon LA, Carvalho LP, et al. : Meta-transcriptome Profiling of the Human- Leishmania braziliensis Cutaneous Lesion. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(9):e0004992. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Masoudzadeh N, Mizbani A, Taslimi Y, et al. : Leishmania tropica infected human lesions: Whole genome transcription profiling. Acta Trop. 2017;176:236–41. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Vivarini ÁC, Calegari-Silva TC, Saliba AM, et al. : Systems Approach Reveals Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2/Protein Kinase R Crosstalk in Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1127. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Salih MAM, Fakiola M, Lyons PA, et al. : Expression profiling of Sudanese visceral leishmaniasis patients pre- and post-treatment with sodium stibogluconate. Parasite Immunol. 2017;39(6):e12431. 10.1111/pim.12431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gardinassi LG, Garcia GR, Costa CH, et al. : Blood Transcriptional Profiling Reveals Immunological Signatures of Distinct States of Infection of Humans with Leishmania infantum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(11):e0005123. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Espitia CM, Saldarriaga OA, Travi BL, et al. : Transcriptional profiling of the spleen in progressive visceral leishmaniasis reveals mixed expression of type 1 and type 2 cytokine-responsive genes. BMC Immunol. 2014;15:38. 10.1186/s12865-014-0038-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kong F, Saldarriaga OA, Spratt H, et al. : Transcriptional Profiling in Experimental Visceral Leishmaniasis Reveals a Broad Splenic Inflammatory Environment that Conditions Macrophages toward a Disease-Promoting Phenotype. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(1):e1006165. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Medina-Colorado AA, Osorio EY, Saldarriaga OA, et al. : Splenic CD4 + T Cells in Progressive Visceral Leishmaniasis Show a Mixed Effector-Regulatory Phenotype and Impair Macrophage Effector Function through Inhibitory Receptor Expression. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169496. 10.1371/journal.pone.0169496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Seifert K, Juhls C, Salguero FJ, et al. : Sequential chemoimmunotherapy of experimental visceral leishmaniasis using a single low dose of liposomal amphotericin B and a novel DNA vaccine candidate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(9):5819–23. 10.1128/AAC.00273-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Pawitan Y, Michiels S, Koscielny S, et al. : False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(13):3017–24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, et al. : STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D447–52. 10.1093/nar/gku1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Rusinova I, Forster S, Yu S, et al. : Interferome v2.0: an updated database of annotated interferon-regulated genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D1040–6. 10.1093/nar/gks1215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Venny: An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn's diagrams [Internet]. 2007–2015. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Melby PC, Chandrasekar B, Zhao W, et al. : The hamster as a model of human visceral leishmaniasis: progressive disease and impaired generation of nitric oxide in the face of a prominent Th1-like cytokine response. J Immunol. 2001;166(3):1912–20. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.1912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Beattie L, Peltan A, Maroof A, et al. : Dynamic imaging of experimental Leishmania donovani-induced hepatic granulomas detects Kupffer cell-restricted antigen presentation to antigen-specific CD8 T cells. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(3):e1000805. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Murray HW: Tissue granuloma structure-function in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Int J Exp Pathol. 2001;82(5):249–67. 10.1046/j.1365-2613.2001.00199.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Gissen P, Arias IM: Structural and functional hepatocyte polarity and liver disease. J Hepatol. 2015;63(4):1023–37. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.06.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Jayaraman P, Jacques MK, Zhu C, et al. : TIM3 Mediates T Cell Exhaustion during Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(3):e1005490. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Wherry EJ, Ha SJ, Kaech SM, et al. : Molecular signature of CD8 + T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity. 2007;27(4):670–84. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kreit M, Vertommen D, Gillet L, et al. : The Interferon-Inducible Mouse Apolipoprotein L9 and Prohibitins Cooperate to Restrict Theiler's Virus Replication. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133190. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Engwerda CR, Murphy ML, Cotterell SE, et al. : Neutralization of IL-12 demonstrates the existence of discrete organ-specific phases in the control of Leishmania donovani. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28(2):669–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Moore JW, Beattie L, Osman M, et al. : CD4 + Recent Thymic Emigrants Are Recruited into Granulomas during Leishmania donovani Infection but Have Limited Capacity for Cytokine Production. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163604. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Sacks DL, Melby PC: Animal models for the analysis of immune responses to leishmaniasis. Curr Protoc Immunol.edited by John E Coligan [ et al].2015;108:19.2.1–24. 10.1002/0471142735.im1902s108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Blackwell JM, Roberts B, Alexander J: Response of BALB/c mice to leishmanial infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1985;122:97–106. 10.1007/978-3-642-70740-7_15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Escobar P, Yardley V, Croft SL: Activities of hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine), AmBisome, and sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam) against Leishmania donovani in immunodeficient scid mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(6):1872–5. 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1872-1875.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Maroof A, Brown N, Smith B, et al. : Therapeutic vaccination with recombinant adenovirus reduces splenic parasite burden in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(5):853–63. 10.1093/infdis/jir842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Stäger S, Alexander J, Carter KC, et al. : Both interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-4 receptor alpha signaling contribute to the development of hepatic granulomas with optimal antileishmanial activity. Infect Immun. 2003;71(8):4804–7. 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4804-4807.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Anderson CF, Oukka M, Kuchroo VJ, et al. : CD4 +CD25 -Foxp3 - Th1 cells are the source of IL-10-mediated immune suppression in chronic cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Exp Med. 2007;204(2):285–97. 10.1084/jem.20061886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Owens BM, Beattie L, Moore JW, et al. : IL-10-producing Th1 cells and disease progression are regulated by distinct CD11c + cell populations during visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(7):e1002827. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Stager S, Maroof A, Zubairi S, et al. : Distinct roles for IL-6 and IL-12p40 in mediating protection against Leishmania donovani and the expansion of IL-10 + CD4 + T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36(7):1764–71. 10.1002/eji.200635937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Brockmann L, Gagliani N, Steglich B, et al. : IL-10 Receptor Signaling Is Essential for T R1 Cell Function In Vivo. J Immunol. 2017;198(3):1130–41. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Ranatunga D, Hedrich CM, Wang F, et al. : A human IL10 BAC transgene reveals tissue-specific control of IL-10 expression and alters disease outcome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(40):17123–8. 10.1073/pnas.0904955106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Kumar R, Chauhan SB, Ng SS, et al. : Immune Checkpoint Targets for Host-Directed Therapy to Prevent and Treat Leishmaniasis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1492. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Lv D, Li Y, Zhang W, et al. : TRIM24 is an oncogenic transcriptional co-activator of STAT3 in glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1454. 10.1038/s41467-017-01731-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Perez-Lloret J, Okoye IS, Guidi R, et al. : T-cell-intrinsic Tif1α/Trim24 regulates IL-1R expression on T H2 cells and T H2 cell-mediated airway allergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(5):E568–76. 10.1073/pnas.1522287113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Josset L, Belser JA, Pantin-Jackwood MJ, et al. : Implication of inflammatory macrophages, nuclear receptors, and interferon regulatory factors in increased virulence of pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus after host adaptation. J Virol. 2012;86(13):7192–206. 10.1128/JVI.00563-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Gechijian LN, Buckley DL, Lawlor MA, et al. : Functional TRIM24 degrader via conjugation of ineffectual bromodomain and VHL ligands. Nat Chem Biol. 2018;14(4):405–12. 10.1038/s41589-018-0010-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Reiner NE, Malemud CJ: Arachidonic acid metabolism in murine leishmaniasis ( Donovani): ex-vivo evidence for increased cyclooxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase activity in spleen cells. Cell Immunol. 1984;88(2):501–10. 10.1016/0008-8749(84)90181-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Saha A, Biswas A, Srivastav S, et al. : Prostaglandin E 2 negatively regulates the production of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and IL-17 in visceral leishmaniasis. J Immunol. 2014;193(5):2330–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.1400399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Dalton JE, Kaye PM: Immunomodulators: use in combined therapy against leishmaniasis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8(7):739–42. 10.1586/eri.10.64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Faleiro RJ, Kumar R, Bunn PT, et al. : Combined Immune Therapy for the Treatment of Visceral Leishmaniasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(2):e0004415. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Murphy ML, Cotterell SE, Gorak PM, et al. : Blockade of CTLA-4 enhances host resistance to the intracellular pathogen, Leishmania donovani. J Immunol. 1998;161(8):4153–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Zubairi S, Sanos SL, Hill S, et al. : Immunotherapy with OX40L-Fc or anti-CTLA-4 enhances local tissue responses and killing of Leishmania donovani. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34(5):1433–40. 10.1002/eji.200324021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Cruz-Roa A, Gilmore H, Basavanhally A, et al. : High-throughput adaptive sampling for whole-slide histopathology image analysis (HASHI) via convolutional neural networks: Application to invasive breast cancer detection. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196828. the digital pathology company Inspirata Inc. Drs Madabhushi, Feldman, Ganesan, and Tomaszewski also serve on the scientific advisory board for the digital pathology company Inspirata Inc. Dr. Madabhushi also has an equity stake in Inspirata Inc. and Elucid Bioimaging Inc. 10.1371/journal.pone.0196828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Fountzilas E, Tsimberidou AM: Overview of precision oncology trials: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018;11(8):797–804. 10.1080/17512433.2018.1504677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Nichols JA, Herbert Chan HW, Baker MAB: Machine learning: applications of artificial intelligence to imaging and diagnosis. Biophys Rev. 2018. 10.1007/s12551-018-0449-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Kaye P: CRACKIT Virtual Infectious Diseases Project. OSF. 2018. 10.17605/OSF.IO/9WSDK [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Nov 22. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.16203.r34134

Referee response for version 1

Philip Scott 1

This study provides an analysis of transcriptional changes occurring in the Leishmania donovani infected mouse over time in the spleen and liver. There is no comparable kinetic analysis of transcriptional changes in visceral leishmaniasis, thus indicating the significance of the work. The authors also attempt to compare their findings with published transcriptional analyses in hamster and human VL, which is useful. Overall, the study is well-done with some important caveats that the authors are aware of and which they mention in the text. First and foremost, the kinetic study in mice is a combination of two experiments and the authors might be clearer in how they handled the potential batch effects that one might anticipate seeing. Looking at Figure 2 it would appear that there are significant differences between the first experiment (Day 15, 17 and 21) and the second experiment (day 36 and 42).  Second, a comparison between data generated by microarray and RNAseq will have several notable issues, and while the authors mention this issue they might expand a bit on how those differences will influence interpretation of their results. It can be useful to make these comparisons, but critical to ensure the readers understand the significant caveats. Finally, it would be helpful to have a clearer discussion of what they have found out about tissue differences in response to infection between the spleen and liver, and how those differences might be responsible for differences in the parasite control that is seen in these two tissues.

The minor problem that becomes a bigger problem as it is evident in many of the figures is the inability to read several of the figures because of font size, as well as some figures that may not be informative for the readers. For example: Fig. 1C-D: arrows almost invisible: Fig. 3A. difficult to evaluate; Fig. 3C- Font size; Fig. 3E- Font size; Fig 5B (a really cool figure)- but font size too small for the labeled genes; Fig. 5C-F- difficult to interpret; Fig. 11C, D- Font size; Fig. 12C- Font size. One additional question: There appear to be no changes in the granulomas in Fig. 6B from day 21 to 42. Is this expected?

In summary, in spite of the caveats mentioned above, this study provides data that can be mined by others to better understand the immune responses in VL. 

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Nov 20. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.16203.r34135

Referee response for version 1

Syamal Roy 1

The manuscript entitled “Tissue and host species-specific transcriptional changes in models of experimental visceral leishmaniasis” by Ashwin et al. describes tissue specific alteration in transcriptome in Leishmania donovani infected Balb/c mice in a longitudinal infection and compares the results with those from other species.

The number of DE probes was studied between normal and infected splenic tissues of Balb/c mice as a function of time, peaking at d36.  After removal of multiple probes, the number of annotated genes was 5096 set across all time points. The most commonly enriched genes were IFN-Y, TNF-α signalling, IL-6-JAK/STAT signaling, E2F targets, KRAS signaling and others. Interestingly these changes are coupled with extra medullary myelopoiesis in spleen. IPA showed significant upstream regulators predicted to be up regulated during infection whereas IL-10RA and TRIM24 were upstream regulators that were predicted to be down regulated, despite not being DE themselves. Using the Interferome database they could show that 32.3% of all DE genes scored as interferon inducible. Further pathway analysis was done to find upstream regulators of the DE genes. The mouse data was compared with the hamster and human data available in the literature. It is also highly appreciable that the data collected from the animals used in this study forms part of a CRACKIT Virtual Infectious Diseases Research Challenge program that focuses on generating an in silico model of the immune response during murine EVL in order to reduce the number of animals required for basic research on immune regulation and for evaluating potentially novel therapeutic interventions. Besides this, they have also made Microarray data accessible in the public domain through Gene Expression Omnibus a part of NCBI Databases.

And finally, they have confirmed that there is marked tissue-specific alteration in the transcriptome of infected mice over time and also identified commonality and differences between murine, hamster and human responses to infection that were previously unrecognized. They have shown the commonality of interferon-regulated genes while confirming a greater activation of type 2 immune pathways in infected hamsters compared to mice, and also pointed out that Cytokine genes and genes encoding immune checkpoints were markedly tissue-specific and dynamic in their expression and pathways. Through data, they have made an effort to address the value of measuring peripheral blood transcriptomics as a potential window into the underlying systemic disease. They could show a 26-gene signature that is common to spleen, liver and blood during murine VL. Oddly enough, there is a lack of similarity in whole blood transcriptomic response between mouse and human systems.

The major challenge now is the absence of an experimental model that would mimic the spectrum of human disease. Studies on the animal model provide us with a wealth of information about the host-parasite interaction, but there is no such model available that would reproduce human disease. Thus, so many questions remain unanswered in order to design control strategies. This observation re-enforces the notion that there is a gap between experimental data and human disease on leishmaniasis.

General comments:

  1. The authors try to compare DE transcripts at d28 post infection from naïve hamsters to L. donovani to 36 days post infected mice and their study is based on the best match (page 9 of 21). It will be nice if the basis for the match criterion can be elaborated.

  2. Figure 5A is a Venn diagram showing the overlap of DE genes in page 10. It looks like a weighted Venn diagram and the authors have cited Venny 2.1 for making Venn diagram but I wonder if the weighted Venn cannot be formed by Venny 2.1.  It will be helpful if the tool or package that has been utilized for its formation can be included. In case it is just a normal Venn diagram then the figure requires an edit.

  3. Figure 5B: Please provide the citation to the tool or package that has been utilized for the correlation plot of Log2FC for mouse and hamster DE genes.

  4. There are a few issues like parasite stain, duration of infection and resulting host-pathogen interaction etc that are beyond the authors’ control. This raises the question whether even monkeys can be used for testing vaccine candidates as little is known if the immune response to leishmania is similar to that observed in human.

Nevertheless as a whole I think it is a great effort by the group. It is a pleasure to read the article.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Nov 15. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.16203.r34131

Referee response for version 1

Washington Luis Conrado dos-Santos 1, Caroline Vilas Boas de Melo 2

This is a very informative paper that compares gene expression during the early course of EVL in mice and hamsters, the differential expression pattern in spleen, liver and whole blood and the experimental data with the available data obtained from HVL. The strategy used is robust and very transparent. The results are in accordance with the methodology used. It will help to define new strategies for using of experimental models and to define new markers of immune response for HVL.

METHODS:

Why did the authors perform the study using two different experiments CRACK-IT_1 and CRACK-IT_2?

Tissue transcriptomics: what impact may the early amplification and removal of outliers by normalisation have had on the comparative study presented in the manuscript?

Was any additional normalization needed for comparisons performed between the data presented in this manuscript and those presented in references 39 and 41?

RESULTS:

Figures 1A and 1B_Raw (Supplementary data) The mean spleen weight of control animals at 36 days was ~4x higher than of animals with 14 and 42 days? Was the histology of these enlarged spleens similar to that observed in the other control animals? Do the authors think that including animals with enlarged spleen may have interfered with the data on gene expression?

Figure 1C-1H:

Technical details: For some reason the figures present some degree of opacity impairing adequate visualization. The blue arrows are so small that is difficult to find and the details such as infected macrophages are barely seen.

For the usual reader the loss of red pulp/white pulp differentiation mentioned by the authors in the text may not be easily seen. A more representative image and addition of markers and legends indicating these morphological changes may help to present the data.

Still about the figure comments presented in the text. Extramedullary splenic hematopoiesis is common in normal mice and has a tendency of increasing with age. Did the authors make any comparative quantitative assessment of spleen hematopoiesis between control and infected animals?

Figure 6B: please replace “green square” with “green dots”.

Figure 6E and 6F: I had the impression that there was a substantial decrease in F4/80+ cells in the granuloma. Was there a change in cell population in the granuloma at these stages of infection?

Figure 10: It is interesting that Ptger4, Klrag9 and Havcr2 are upregulated in liver and down regulated in spleen. Can the author comment on this data?

We have read this submission. We believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Nov 14. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.16203.r34133

Referee response for version 1

Yasuyuki Goto 1

Tissue-specific immune responses are always of interest in visceral leishmaniasis. The authors address this question by looking at transcriptomes of the spleen, liver and blood of infected mice and comparing them with infected hamsters and human VL patients. I feel that their approach is reasonable and the data shown here are very useful to the research field. It will be great if the authors can strengthen the conclusion by discussing/interpreting the data more in depth.

Major comments

  • The authors described in the Discussion that BALB/c were used in this study ‘due to their extensive use as an immunological model of infection…’. However, the authors’ group also use C57BL/6 mice for immunological studies of experimental VL. Is there any stronger reason to select BALB/c over C57BL/6?In fact, pathogenesis/immune responses during L. donovani infection may be different between those two inbred mice. For example, in the current study using BALB/c mice, the splenic parasite burden and spleen weight were almost parallel. It means the parasite number per host nuclei are relative stable over the course of infection. In contrast, C57BL/6 mice show higher increase in LDU over spleen weight, according to Ato M et al., Nature Immunology, 2002. Also, splenomegaly by L. donovani infection seems worse in BALB/c mice (~8 times enlargement at D35) than C57BL/6 mice (only 1.7 time at D28). These differences should be welcomed because they mean that comparison of the inbred mouse strains is also a viable approach besides comparison with other species.

  • Although the title says tissue and host species-‘specific’ changes, I feel that the article more focuses on commonality among tissues and species. For example, the last part of this work focuses on the 26 genes commonly up-regulated in the spleen, liver and blood; what is the significance of identifying such genes? The authors know that at the time point kinetics of parasite proliferation in the spleen and liver are different, so what kind of phenomena should be associated with the commonly up-regulated genes? I believe that more careful watch into differently regulated genes, across tissues and across species, is indispensable. Identification of IDO-1 as a mouse-low, hamster-high and human-high factor is really intriguing and the authors are encouraged to take further analyses to identify such ‘protection-related factor candidates’ because it is supposed to be their objective.

  • Related to the previous comment, representation of each tissue/species is a little vague. My understanding is; mouse spleen, vulnerable at D42; mouse liver, protective at D42; hamster spleen, vulnerable at D42; hamster liver, vulnerable at D42; human blood, reflecting systemic vulnerable condition. Is it correct and if yes what does mouse blood represent? Although I understand the authors know that it is not that simple, data analyses and discussions with clear and consistent hypotheses/assumptions are helpful to the readers.

  • Page 4: Discussions on IL-10Ra and Trim24 are difficult to understand. ‘Upstream regulators that were predicted to be down regulated, despite not being DE themselves’, do you mean that they are upstream regulators for down-regulated genes? Also, what does this actually mean in the setting of murine VL? Can you also discuss the fact that IL-10 is up-regulated in the spleen at all time points and what it means in connection with IL-10Ra?

  • Not sure what Figure 3E means, what two kinds of line means there. No description in the legend. Besides the letters are too small to see.

 

Minor comments:

  • Many abbreviations are not spelled out at their first appearance; for example, DE and GSEA are explained in full at Results section while already used in Methods. Check other abbreviations too, some are not being spelled out at all.

  • Supplementary table for Figure 1A and 1B Raw data says the spleen weight of naïve mice at D36 is 412 mg. Please correct.

  • Page 9: The first sentence ‘Kong et al….’ please add the reference number here too.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Microarray data is available via the Gene Expression Omnibus (Ascension number GSE113376: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE113376).

    OSF: CRACKIT Virtual Infectious Diseases project. Supplementary Table 1Supplementary Table 5 (see information below in Supplementary material) and raw data for Figure 1A and B and Figure 6A–F are available, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9WSDK 81.

    Data on OSF are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

    Whole slide images and individual mouse metadata are available from www.leishpathnet.org (study designations CRACKIT-1 and CRACKIT-2). Requests for access to tissue samples from these studies will be accommodated where possible and subject to availability.

    RNA-Seq data from a hamster model of VL is available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE91187

    Blood transcription of human infection are available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE77528


    Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

    RESOURCES