Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 24;89:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.08.021

The role of ARID1B, a BAF chromatin remodeling complex subunit, in neural development and behavior

Jeffrey J Moffat b,#, Eui-Man Jung b,#, Minhan Ka c, Amanda L Smith b, Byeong Tak Jeon a, Gijs W E Santen d, Woo-Yang Kim a,*
PMCID: PMC6249083  NIHMSID: NIHMS1505763  PMID: 30149092

Abstract

Haploinsufficiency of the chromatin remodeling factor ARID1B leads to autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Several independent research groups, including our own, recently examined the effects of heterozygous deletion of Arid1b in mice and reported severe behavioral abnormalities reminiscent of autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability as well as marked changes in gene expression and decreased body size. Arid1b heterozygous mice also display significant cortical excitatory/inhibitory imbalance due to altered GABAergic neuron numbers and impaired inhibitory synaptic transmission. Abnormal epigenetic modifications, including histone acetylation and methylation, are additionally associated with Arid1b haploinsufficiency in the brain. Treating adult Arid1b mutant mice with a positive GABA allosteric modulator, however, rescues multiple behavioral abnormalities, such as cognitive and social impairments, as well as elevated anxiety. While treating Arid1b haploinsufficient mice with recombinant mouse growth hormone successfully increases body size, it has no effect on aberrant behavior. Here we summarize the recent findings regarding the role of ARID1B in brain development and behavior and discuss the utility of the Arid1b heterozygous mouse model in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric research. We also discuss some of the opportunities and potential challenges in developing translational applications for humans and possible avenues for further research into the mechanisms of ARID1B pathology in the brain.

Keywords: ARID1B, autism, intellectual disability, neural progenitor, brain development, interneuron, GABA intervention

Introduction

ARID1B encodes AT-rich-interactive-domain-containing protein 1B (ARID1B), a subunit of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex. Haploinsufficiency of this gene has been linked to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) (Hoyer et al., 2012; Santen et al., 2012; Tsurusaki et al., 2012; Santen et al., 2014). Recent studies from our group and others have now examined the effects of heterozygous deletion of Arid1b in mice, which provides multiple novel insights into the mechanisms and roles of Arid1b in the developing brain and in behavior and suggest potential pharmacologic treatments for ARID1B-related neurodevelopmental disorders (Celen et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2017; Shibutani et al., 2017). In this review we summarize and analyze these findings and provide potential plans for future research. Further understanding of ARID1B and its functions in the developing brain are now much more feasible with the availability and description of animal models and may play an important role in the future of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorder research.

ARID1B mutations in human patients

ARID1B mutations are prevalent in ID, a developmental disorder characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual function and adaptive behavior. An overall incidence is estimated to be between 1 and 8% (Roeleveld et al., 1997; Simonoff et al., 2006; Westerinen et al., 2007). As ID is a severely incapacitating condition that imposes a significant burden on affected individuals and their families, much work has been done to identify its underlying causes. ID has a genetic origin in the majority of cases, and studies of X-linked, autosomal-recessive, syndromic and sporadic cases have resulted in the identification of more than two thousand ID-associated genes. Mutational analysis in 887 patients with unexplained ID reveals nine different de novo nonsense or frameshift mutations predicted to cause ARID1B haploinsufficiency, indicating haploinsufficiency of ARID1B as a common cause of ID (Hoyer et al., 2012), which was also confirmed in more recent exome sequencing studies of large cohorts of ID patients, which identify ARID1B as the most frequent cause of ID (Wright et al., 2015).

Although ID is a very heterogeneous disease, it has long been recognized that there are syndromic subtypes of ID which are delineated by combinations of external features and/or congenital anomalies as syndromes. Coffin-Siris Syndrome (CSS) is such a syndrome, and aside from mild to severe ID, patients often have hypoplastic nails on the fifth finger and/or toe, coarse facial features, growth deficiencies, sparse scalp hair and hypertrichosis elsewhere (Schrier Vergano et al., 1993). Corpus callosum abnormalities are also often observed in individuals with CSS (Halgren et al., 2012; Santen et al., 2014; Mignot et al., 2016). To identify the genetic basis of CSS, Santen et al. utilize whole-exome sequencing on three diagnosed individuals, revealing de novo truncating mutations in one copy of ARID1B in all cases. Array-based copy-number variation analysis in 2,000 individuals diagnosed with ID reveals 3 subjects with deletions in the ARID1B gene who also have phenotypes partially overlapping with that of CSS (Santen et al., 2012). Using exome sequencing in 23 individuals with CSS, another group shows 6 patients with de novo heterozygous mutations in the ARID1B gene, providing further evidence of ARID1B haploinsufficiency as a cause of CSS (Tsurusaki et al., 2012). In addition, several targeted sequencing studies confirm mutations in BAF complex genes in patients with CSS (Santen et al., 2013; Wieczorek et al., 2013; Tsurusaki et al., 2014).

ASD is characterized by significant communication and social interaction deficits as well as restricted interests and stereotyped behaviors (Walsh et al., 2011). ID is also a highly prevalent phenotype in individuals with ASD, seen in as many as 30-75% of those affected (Fombonne, 1999; O'Brien and Pearson, 2004; Perou et al., 2013; Baio et al., 2018). The SFARI Gene initiative, a comprehensive online database of genes and copy number variants associated with ASD, has identified ARID1B as one of the 25 high confidence genes related to autism. Indeed, many of the described ARID1B patients also have autism. Next generation sequencing and microarray analysis of samples from eight patients, all presenting with ID, shows de novo translocations or deletions resulting in a truncated copy of ARID1B in all cases (Halgren et al., 2012). Of these patients, 5 are diagnosed with ASD or have autistic traits. In addition, 4 of these 5 patients show corpus callosum abnormalities demonstrated by brain imaging. This finding suggests that structural defects may be associated with the cognitive and behavioral phenotypes stemming from ARID1B haploinsufficiency. A separate study shows that the transcript level of the ARID1B gene is reduced in individuals with ASD (Nord et al., 2011).

Taken together, these studies all emphasize the role ARID1B plays in proper brain development and behavior. Various de novo mutations resulting in haploinsufficiency cause ID, CSS, ASD, and corpus callosum abnormalities to varying degrees. These findings add to the growing evidence that mutations in chromatin-remodeling genes are important contributors to neurodevelopmental disorders (Ronan et al., 2013; Sokpor et al., 2017; Gabriele et al., 2018), and that several of these disorders with overlapping phenotypes have converging genetic causes.

Arid1b knockdown and neuronal development

Proper neurite outgrowth and maintenance, which involve coordinated changes between the actin cytoskeleton and the microtubule network, are critical for normal neural development and brain function (Tsaneva-Atanasova et al., 2009). This process is regulated by the BAF (SWI/SNF) complex (Weinberg et al., 2013; Choi et al., 2015; Bachmann et al., 2016). ARID1B is a component of the mammalian BRG1/BRM associated factor (BAF) chromatin remodeling complex (Ho and Crabtree, 2010; Ronan et al., 2013) and plays an essential role in neurite outgrowth and maintenance. Using in utero shRNA delivery, Ka et al. show that ARID1B is required for dendrite outgrowth and arborization in cortical and hippocampal pyramidal neurons during brain development (Ka et al., 2016). In addition to decreased dendritic branching, ARID1B-deficient neurons exhibit markedly decreased dendritic innervation into cortical layer I and fewer attachments of dendritic terminals at the pial surface (Ka et al., 2016). It is noteworthy that layer I of the cerebral cortex receives inputs primarily from neurons in higher-order thalamic and cortical areas, and neurons in this layer preferentially increase their activity during attention-demanding processes (Baluch and Itti, 2011; van Gaal and Lamme, 2012; Larkum, 2013). Thus, the decreased dendritic innervation into cortical layer I caused by ARID1B deficiency may disrupt balanced excitatory and inhibitory inputs and thereby give rise to pathologic conditions of ID and ASD.

Dendritic spines are the major sites of excitatory synaptic input in the brain and, therefore, form the basis of synaptic circuitry (Harris and Kater, 1994; Bourne and Harris, 2008). Ka et al. show that ARID1B contributes to spine formation, maturation and maintenance (Ka et al., 2016). ARID1B-deficient neurons exhibit a decreased number of dendritic spines and a prevalence of filopodia-like immature spines (Ka et al., 2016). The aberrant dendrites and spines in ARID1B-deficient pyramidal neurons greatly resemble the unbranched dendritic and filopodia-like spine morphology observed in mouse models of ID and ASD, as well as in Rett, Down, and fragile-X syndrome (FXS) models (Irwin et al., 2002; McKinney et al., 2005; Jentarra et al., 2010). Thus, ARID1B abnormalities may contribute to clinical outcomes by creating inappropriate synaptic connectivity. Incorrect growth and differentiation of dendrites is linked to the pathology of many neurodevelopmental and psychiatric diseases including ID, ASD and schizophrenia (Machado-Salas, 1984; Kaufmann and Moser, 2000; Fiala et al., 2002; Chapleau et al., 2009; Penzes et al., 2011). Abnormalities in the dendritic differentiation of cortical pyramidal neurons are seen in postmortem brain samples from individuals with ID (Huttenlocher, 1974). A reduction in spine size along dendrites is also reported in Down syndrome (Marin-Padilla, 1976; Roberts et al., 1996) and altered dendrite arborization in cortical pyramidal neurons is found in the brains of Rett syndrome patients (Belichenko et al., 1994; Armstrong, 2005).

Neural phenotypes of Arid1b knockout mice

Three recent independent studies, including our own, describe abnormal brain anatomy and cellular composition in Arid1b heterozygous mice (Celen et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2017; Shibutani et al., 2017). We observe normal density and distribution of pyramidal neurons, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes in Arid1b heterozygous mice in our study but find that GABAergic interneuron numbers are significantly reduced in Arid1b mutant mice, due to increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation of progenitors in the ganglionic eminence (Jung et al., 2017). The ventral ganglionic eminence is essential for the generation of GABAergic interneurons (Pleasure et al., 2000; Brandao and Romcy-Pereira, 2015). GABAergic interneurons containing parvalbumin (PV), calretinin, somatostatin or calbindin-D28k are the primary source of GABA in the nervous system and play an important role in neural circuitry and activity (Kelsom and Lu, 2013; Butt et al., 2017). Specifically, the number of PV-positive interneurons is reduced in several brain regions including the cortex, amygdala, thalamus, and hippocampus in Arid1b heterozygous mice, but Arid1b haploinsufficiency does not lead to significant changes in the somatostatin-, calbindin- or calretinin-positive interneuron number in Arid1b heterozygous cortices (Jung et al., 2017). Decreases in GABAergic interneuron numbers in the cortex and hippocampus have previously been linked to autism and schizophrenia (Benes and Berretta, 2001; Pizzarelli and Cherubini, 2011) and, more specifically, the number of PV-positive interneurons has been shown to be significantly reduced in autism and schizophrenia in both mouse models and postmortem brain tissue (Gogolla et al., 2009; Lawrence et al., 2010). Consistently, ASD-like behavioral profiles, such as social interaction and communication deficits with repetitive and stereotyped behavior, can be observed in PV knockout mice (Wohr et al., 2015). Neuronal excitatory/inhibitory balance is regulated at the synaptic level, and a reduction in inhibitory synapse number or strength results in a shift of that balance (Gao and Penzes, 2015; Nelson and Valakh, 2015). As a result, excitatory/inhibitory imbalance leads to broken synaptic homeostasis and facilitates the risk of the neurological disorders such as autism and schizophrenia. Arid1b heterozygous mice exhibit fewer inhibitory synaptic puncta, namely vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter- (VGAT) and glutamic acid decarboxylase 2- (GAD2) positive puncta, in the cerebral cortex (Jung et al., 2017). In addition, glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (Gad1) and Gad2 expression levels are markedly decreased in Arid1b haploinsufficient mouse brains. Heterozygous deletion of Arid1b also leads to abnormal miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSC) frequencies, characterized by increased inter-event intervals and increased inhibitory synaptic cleft width (Jung et al., 2017). Furthermore, GABAergic interneuron neurite number and length are decreased in Arid1b heterozygous mice (Jung et al., 2017). Thus, Arid1b haploinsufficiency results in excitatory/inhibitory imbalance via decreased GABAergic interneuron numbers and impaired synaptic transmission of inhibitory signals.

Two other reports indicate that a small subset of Arid1b heterozygous mice are born with hydrocephalus (Celen et al., 2017; Shibutani et al., 2017), which corresponds well with some individuals with ASD (Turner et al., 2016) and a portion of patients with CSS who present with Dandy-Walker malformations (Schrier Vergano et al., 1993; Imai et al., 2001). Celen et al. also report reductions in the size of the cerebral cortex, corpus callosum and dentate gyrus, as well as decreased adult hippocampal neurogenesis, in Arid1b mutant mice (Celen et al., 2017). Shibutani et al. report no neuroanatomical abnormalities in non-hydrocephalic Arid1b haploinsufficient mice, but they also did not make any detailed histological examinations in that study (Shibutani et al., 2017). We also do not report any corpus callosum abnormalities, as we did not explicitly investigate the corpus callosum in the cited study (Jung et al., 2017).

Gene expression changes in Arid1b knockout mice

The ATP-dependent BAF chromatin remodeling complex regulates gene expression via nucleosome remodeling (Singhal et al., 2010; Alver et al., 2017). Considering ARID1B’s role as a member of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex, it is unsurprising that heterozygous deletion of Arid1b leads to broad changes in gene expression in the brain. Shibutani et al. report that many of the genes shown to be up- and down-regulated in Arid1b heterozygous brains are similarly altered in human patients with ASD and in another animal model of autism (Cdh8 heterozygous mice) (Shibutani et al., 2017). Celen et al. also report multiple changes in gene expression in Arid1b heterozygous mice, when compared to wild-type controls. In the adult hippocampus they find that genes associated with nervous system development and psychological, behavioral and developmental disorders appear to be distinctly affected. More specifically, they describe marked expression changes in Ephrin, nNOS, axonal guidance and glutamate receptor signaling pathway-related genes (Celen et al., 2017). Of the 140 differentially-expressed genes they identify, 91 are thought to be directly targeted by the BAF chromatin remodeling complex (Attanasio et al., 2014; Celen et al., 2017) and 14 are included amongst the highest ranking autism risk genes in the SFARI database (Basu et al., 2009; Celen et al., 2017). A list of these genes can be found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Selected genes with altered expression in Arid1b heterozygous mice

GENE FUNCTION/DESCRIPTION ASD ASSOCIATION*
ARID1B Chromatin remodeling subunit High confidence (syndromic)
GRIN2B NMDA receptor subunit High confidence
ZBTB20 Transcription factor Suggestive evidence
(syndromic)
PRICKLE1 Nuclear receptor Suggestive evidence
PRICKLE2 Nuclear receptor Suggestive evidence
RBFOX1 Alternative splicing regulator Suggestive evidence
HOMER1 Postsynaptic density scaffolding Minimal evidence
LAMA1 Lamanin alpha 1 subunit Minimal evidence
MKL2 Transcriptional coactivator Minimal evidence
NBEA A-kinase anchor protein Minimal evidence
NTNG1 Neurite outgrowth-promoting protein Minimal evidence
SOX5 Transcription factor Minimal evidence
SSPO Neuronal aggregation modulator Minimal evidence
EGR2 Transcription factor Hypothesized
EPHA6 Receptor tyrosine kinase Hypothesized
ITGA4 Integrin subunit Hypothesized
ROBO1 Membrane protein involved in axon guidance and cell migration Hypothesized
*

Based on Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI) numerical gene scoring: 1 = High confidence; 2 = Strong candidate; 3 = Suggestive evidence; 4 = Minimal evidence; 5 = Hypothesized; 6 = Not supported.

Histone modifications such as acetylation and deacetylation are important for the regulation of gene expression (Eberharter and Becker, 2002; Kurdistani and Grunstein, 2003; Shahbazian and Grunstein, 2007; Bannister and Kouzarides, 2011; Lawrence et al., 2016). We report that Arid1b haploinsufficiency leads to an overall decrease in the acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9ac) and tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3), both markers of transcriptional activation, and an increase in tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27, a marker for transcriptional repression (Figure 1) (Jung et al., 2017). We do not, however, report any global changes in histone acetyl-transferase (HAT) or histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity in Arid1b heterozygous brains, but do observe decreases in the level of acetyl-CREB-binding protein (CBP), which has been shown to enhance HAT function (Vecsey et al., 2007; Jung et al., 2017). In a similar vein, a previous study shows that HAT and HDAC activities are regulated by the interaction of ARID1B with HATs or HDACs in mouse osteoblast cells (Nagl et al., 2007). We also report decreased protein levels for PCAF, a HAT, in Arid1b homozygous embryonic brains, but not in Arid1b heterozygous brains, and decreased binding of several HATs to H3K9 acetylated sites in Arid1b heterozygous brains (Jung et al., 2017).

Figure 1. Graphical model of the neuronal effects of Arid1b haploinsufficiency.

Figure 1.

Arid1b heterozygous mice exhibit wider inhibitory synaptic clefts and narrower postsynaptic density (PSD). The mutant mice also show lower levels of transcription-activating histone post-translational modifications at specific GABAergic neuron-associated promoters. The latter leads to decreased phosphorylation of Ser 5 within the CTD of RNA polymerase II at these DNA loci, which is necessary for gene transcription. These changes in gene expression contribute to the functional, anatomical and behavioral abnormalities observed in Arid1b mutant mice.

Corresponding with the overall reduction in PV-positive interneurons in Arid1b heterozygous cortices, we observe a decrease in Pvalb and Ntrk2 transcripts in mutant brains. We further report that ARID1B binds to the Pvalb promoter in wild-type brains and that this localized binding is decreased in Arid1b heterozygous brains along with decreased H3K9ac in this region. One presumed effect of these changes is the decrease in transcriptional initiation for the Pvalb gene, shown by lower levels of the phosphorylated (ser5)-carboxy-terminal-domain of RNA polymerase II at the Pvalb promoter (Figure 1) (Jung et al., 2017). Therefore, ARID1B is likely an essential factor in regulating GABA neuron-associated genes through recruiting histone modification molecules to specific promoters and promoting chromatin remodeling for RNA polymerases to initiate gene transcription. These findings, in particular, provide insight into novel mechanisms for ARID1B-mediated gene regulation, as it appears that ARID1B-histone modifier interactions may act to facilitate gene transcription. It remains to be seen whether this is the case at the promoters of other genes altered in the Arid1b heterozygous mouse brain. These findings also suggest that the gross neural effects of Arid1b-deletion may be due to impaired stem cell differentiation via gene regulation during early development, as only a subset of inhibitory neurons are significantly decreased in Arid1b heterozygote mice.

Particularly, ARID1B may regulate histone modification at the Wnt signaling genes because Arid1b haploinsufficiency reduces the expression of Wnt-α-catenin signaling-related genes including Cyclin D1, c-Myc, n-Myc, Creb, Lef1, Ctnnb1, and others in inhibitory neural progenitors (Jung et al., 2017). A number of studies show that histone modifications can regulate cell proliferation and differentiation as well as cell death (Mehnert and Kelly, 2007; Roidl and Hacker, 2014; Li et al., 2018). Wnt signaling plays important roles in ventral progenitor proliferation during brain development (Liebner et al., 2008; Brandao and Romcy-Pereira, 2015). Furthermore, expression of c-Myc, a key target of Wnt signaling and a cell cycle regulator, is decreased in ARID1B-deficient cells (Nagl et al., 2007). ARID1B deficiency also prevents the self-renewal capacity of embryonic stem cells (Yan et al., 2008). Thus, future studies should consider whether ARID1B can control Wnt-β-catenin signaling in ventral progenitor proliferation and development.

It should be noted that a number of studies have reported that the BAF complex and/or ARID1B repress Wnt-β-catenin signaling in vivo and in vitro in a subset of cell types (Vasileiou et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2016). A previous study, however, finds that BRG1, the central component of the BAF complex, physically interacts with β-catenin and facilitates target gene expression (Barker et al., 2001). Numerous studies demonstrate an extensive assortment of BAF complex configurations dependent on cell type and developmental stage (de la Serna et al., 2001; Olave et al., 2002; Lickert et al., 2004; Ohkawa et al., 2006; Cvekl and Duncan, 2007; Lessard et al., 2007; Li et al., 2013; Xiong et al., 2013; Son and Crabtree, 2014; Yu et al., 2015). This may explain the existence of apparently contradictory results regarding BAF complex regulation of Wnt-β-catenin. It is also possible that ARID1B’s regulation of Wnt-β-catenin signaling in the developing brain occurs in a BAF-independent manner.

Arid1b haploinsufficiency and mouse behavior

ASD is associated with a variety of mutated genes or copy-number variants. Because experimental mouse models are important for discovering the causes and pathogeneses of human disorders, there have been many attempts to develop genetic animal models of ASD based on human ASD-linked genetic mutations (Kazdoba et al., 2014). Typical hallmarks of ASD include impaired social behavior and communication, and repetitive and/or stereotyped behaviors. Additionally, ASD often presents with other co-occurring conditions, including depression, epilepsy, anxiety (Wing and Gould, 1979), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), ID, and motor coordination problems (Purpura et al., 2016). Similar behaviors are seen in animal models of ASD using specific tests developed to measure these behavioral abnormalities. One of the most commonly inherited genetic causes of ASD is FXS, which is caused by an expanded CGG repeat in the 5' untranslated portion of the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1), leading to deficiency or absence of the FMR1 protein (Harris et al., 2008; Kogan et al., 2009). Mouse models of FXS (Fmr1 knockout mice) exhibit several ASD- and ID-like behaviors such as anxiety, social behavior deficits, and cognitive deficiencies, although different groups report varying degrees of behavioral abnormalities and sometimes contradict one another (Harris and Kater, 1994; Peier et al., 2000; Yabe et al., 2004; McNaughton et al., 2008; Pietropaolo et al., 2011; Kazdoba et al., 2014). Due to the multiple variables present in mouse colony maintenance and in the inconsistent environmental conditions between laboratories, reproducing animal behavior, even in the same mouse model, is a difficult task. Without complete and detailed reporting of all protocols and experimental conditions, determining the grounds for discordant behavioral results is next to impossible. Contradictory results in the same mouse strains in different environments can be beneficial, however, as assays performed in standardized conditions actually have an increased likelihood of reporting false-positives (Richter et al., 2009). In order to draw more accurate conclusions, it is therefore beneficial to compare behavioral experiment results between groups using the same or similar animal models.

Recently, three independent groups, including our own, developed mouse models of ARID1B haploinsufficiency. Two of the groups delete exon 5 of the Arid1b gene (Celen et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2017) while the other removes exon 3 (Shibutani et al., 2017), but both strategies appear to result in haploinsufficiency due to frameshift mutations. Celen et al. and Shibutani et al. generate the mutant mice using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing while Jung et al. use a more traditional knockout strategy. The genetic background of the three mouse models is C57BL/6. Each group performed a different array of behavioral assays, many overlapping, and the results are generally concurrent, with a few exceptions. A summary of each group’s results is described in Table 2. All three groups performed the elevated plus maze test for anxiety-like behavior. Arid1b heterozygous mice spend less time in the open arms of the maze and exhibit a lower percentage of entries into open arms, which indicates heightened anxiety (Celen et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2017; Shibutani et al., 2017). In the open field test, Arid1b heterozygous mice spend less time in the center area and enter the center area less frequently than controls, although their total travel distance is not different, which may also indicate anxiety-like behavior (Celen et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2017). In addition, Arid1b heterozygous mice avoid exploring the brightly-lit section in the light-dark box test, another common anxiety assay (Celen et al., 2017). Arid1b heterozygous mice also spend more time immobile in the forced swim and tail suspension tests, used to assess depression-like behavioral phenotypes (Jung et al., 2017), although Shibutani et al. report opposite results in the forced swim test (Shibutani et al., 2017).

Table 2.

Summary of behavioral findings from three studies utilizing Arid1b heterozygous mice

HUMAN BEHAVIORAL CORRELATE BEHAVIORAL ASSAY CELEN ET AL. 2017 JUNG ET AL. 2017 SHIBUTANI ET AL. 2017
ANXIETY Elevated Plus Maze Heightened Anxiety Heightened Anxiety Heightened Anxiety
ANXIETY Open Field Heightened Anxiety Heightened Anxiety Unclear
ANXIETY Light-Dark Box Heightened Anxiety n/a No Change
DEPRESSION Forced Swim n/a Increased Depression Increased Activity
DEPRESSION Tail Suspension n/a Increased Depression n/a
SOCIAL INTERACTION Three-Chamber Test for Sociability n/a Decreased Social Interaction No Change
SOCIAL INTERACTION Three-Chamber Test for Social Novelty Preference n/a Decreased Social Interaction No Change
SOCIAL INTERACTION Home-Cage Social Interaction n/a n/a Decreased Social Interaction
SOCIAL INTERACTION Open Field Social Interaction Decreased Social Interaction Decreased Social Interaction No Change
COMMUNICATION Ultrasonic Vocalizations Altered Communication n/a n/a
REPETITIVE BEHAVIOR Grooming Increased Repetitive Behavior Increased Repetitive Behavior No Change
BEHAVIORAL INFLEXIBILITY Barnes Maze n/a n/a Decreased Behavioral Flexibility
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY Morris Water Maze No Change Impaired Spatial Memory n/a
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY Novel Object Recognition n/a Impaired Recognition Memory n/a
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY T-Maze n/a Impaired Learning No Change
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY Barnes Maze n/a n/a No Change
INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY/FEAR LEARNING Fear Conditioning No Change n/a Increased Long-Term Fear Memory and Fear Generalization
PAIN RESPONSE Response to Foot Shock No Change n/a Heightened Response to Stimulus

As discussed above, one of the key characteristics of ASD is deficits in social behavior (Cohen et al., 1988). We use the three-chamber social assay to assess social interaction and social novelty preference. Arid1b heterozygous mice spend less time in the chamber containing an unfamiliar mouse than in the empty chamber, indicative of impaired social interaction, and also spend less time with a novel stranger mouse than they do with a more-familiar stranger (Jung et al., 2017). Celen et al. report that Arid1b heterozygous mice spend less time interacting with unfamiliar juvenile mice compared to WT littermates, when placed together in a fresh cage (Celen et al., 2017).We additionally report that Arid1b heterozygous mice spend less time interacting with one another when two unfamiliar mice of the same genotype are placed in the open field, compared with WT controls (Jung et al., 2017). Shibutani et al. evaluate social behavior between mice of the same genotype in a home-cage environment and observe decreased interaction between Arid1b heterozygous mice, compared with WT controls. In open field social interaction and three-chamber sociability and social novelty tests, however, Shibutani et al. do not report any differences between Arid1b heterozygous and control mice (Shibutani et al., 2017). This discrepancy could be due to a multitude of factors including animal stress, differences in protocols or environmental stimuli. Taken together, however, all three groups report significant impairments in social behavior in Arid1b heterozygous mice (Celen et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2017; Shibutani et al., 2017). These results agree with those seen in other mouse models of ASD, including haploinsufficiency of Chd8 (Katayama et al., 2016).

Intellectual disability is a common comorbid disorder with ASD and is present in patients with haploinsufficient mutations of ARID1B (Santen et al., 2014), as well as in FXS (Harris et al., 2008). Arid1b heterozygous mice present with learning and memory deficits (Jung et al., 2017), which have also been observed in previous animal models of ASD (Kim et al., 2014). We use the Morris water maze test to assess cognitive function in Arid1b heterozygous mice. These mutant mice exhibit increased escape latencies during training trials and spend less time in the target quadrant during probe trials, with no changes in the distance or speed of swimming, compared with controls (Jung et al., 2017). However, another group reports that Arid1b heterozygous mice do not exhibit cognitive deficits as measured by the Morris water maze test (Celen et al., 2017). Celen and colleagues’ results are unexpected and somewhat surprising given the strong neurogenetic evidence of Arid1b haploinsufficiency causing intellectual disability (Halgren et al., 2012; Hoyer et al., 2012; Santen et al., 2012). In the Barnes maze task, another assay of spatial learning and memory, Shibutani et al. report that Arid1b heterozygous mice demonstrate a similar latency to escape compared with wild type littermates, but, when the escape box is moved to the opposite side of the maze in a reversal task, mutant mice display a significantly longer latency to escape (Shibutani et al., 2017). This is indicative of increased perseveration or behavioral inflexibility. We also perform the novel-object recognition test to assess recognition memory. We find that Arid1b heterozygous mice demonstrate no preference for a novel object over a familiar one, whereas control mice spend considerably more time interacting with the novel object (Jung et al., 2017). Arid1b heterozygous mice are also less successful in the T-maze test, compared to controls (Jung et al., 2017). However, Shibutani et al. report that their Arid1b heterozygous mice do not demonstrate any deficiencies in the T-maze test, although they did not publish any of this data or report the method or protocol used (Shibutani et al., 2017). In addition, Celen et al. report that Arid1b heterozygous mice respond normally to foot shocks and perform similarly to controls in fear conditioning tests, while Shibutani et al. report that Arid1b heterozygous mice display a heightened response to foot shocks and enhanced performance in fear conditioning tests (Shibutani et al., 2017). Reports on FXS mouse models are also inconsistent in contextual and cued fear conditioning tests (Paradee et al., 1999; Dobkin et al., 2000; Van Dam et al., 2000; Auerbach et al., 2011; Ding et al., 2014; Kazdoba et al., 2014), which implies that these fear conditioning paradigms may be unreliable methods for testing cognitive deficits in genetic mouse models of ID.

In summary, Arid1b heterozygous mice demonstrate anxiety-like behavior, social behavior deficits and learning/memory impairments. Although there exists some contradiction regarding the results of a subset of individual behavioral assays, Arid1b heterozygous mice conveniently recapitulate many ASD-like and ID-like behavioral profiles, similar to those seen in other mouse models (Bilousova et al., 2009; Kazdoba et al., 2014; Katayama et al., 2016). Therefore, Arid1b heterozygous mouse models present a useful opportunity for advancing our understanding of the pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms of neurodevelopmental disorders and related behavioral defects.

GABA modulation as therapeutic interventions for Arid1b haploinsufficiency-induced neurodevelopmental conditions

As stark decreases in PV-positive interneurons are seen in Arid1b heterozygous cortices, in our study we attempt to rescue some of the behavioral deficits in these mice using a positive allosteric modulator for the GABAA receptor, clonazepam (Jung et al., 2017). Clonazepam is shown to be effective in treating seizures and anxiety in humans (Dahlin et al., 2003) and also effectively ameliorates some of the behavioral deficits in the BTBR mouse ASD model (Han et al., 2014). Accordingly, we observe that a single intraperitoneal injection of clonazepam at a concentration of 0.0625 mg/kg for 0.5 to 1h prior to behavioral assays is sufficient to rescue impaired recognition memory, social memory and heightened anxiety-like behavior in adult Arid1b heterozygous mice but has no measurable effect on depression-like behaviors. Clonazepam treatment also rescues the decreased mIPSC frequency in Arid1b heterozygous mice (Jung et al., 2017). While it is encouraging to see that treatment with a GABA allosteric modulator is sufficient to rescue several of the hallmark behavioral abnormalities in this mouse model of ASD and ID, attempted restoration of the excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in Arid1b heterozygous mice does not lead to improvements in all behavioral tests. Thus, there appears to be more at play in this mouse model than a gross reduction in the interneuron population. Clonazepam, or related drugs, may still prove to alleviate some of the symptoms caused by excitatory/inhibitory imbalance, be it due to ARID1B haploinsufficiency or other causes. It is especially promising that this treatment leads to improved behavior in adult mice, which may indicate that treatment during a critical developmental window may not be entirely necessary to treat all consequences of ARID1B haploinsufficiency. A deeper understanding of the cell-types and circuits regulating the behaviors related to ASD and ID will be required to develop more targeted therapies.

Arid1b haploinsufficiency and body growth

All three groups find reduced body weight at multiple ages in Arid1b heterozygous mice, compared with controls (Celen et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2017; Shibutani et al., 2017). Jung et al. report that females show less obvious weight differences than males (Jung et al., 2017). Mice lacking one copy of Arid1b also develop disproportionately small kidneys and hearts (Celen et al., 2017). Celen et al. hypothesize that the growth hormone-releasing hormone–growth hormone–Insulin-like growth factor (GHRH-GH-IGF) axis deficiencies could be responsible for the smaller body size observed in Arid1b heterozygous mice and the short stature reported in ARID1B human patients (Santen et al., 2014; Celen et al., 2017). They report reduced IGF1 protein levels in the plasma and lower Igf1 mRNA levels in the liver but no changes in GH in the pituitary gland or fasting plasma of Arid1b heterozygous mice. The pituitary gland also appears to respond normally to GHRH stimulation and they detect no change in Ghrh mRNA levels in the hypothalamus.

To ascertain whether this reduction in IGF1 in Arid1b heterozygous mice is indeed due to a problem with central nervous system (CNS) control of the GHRH-GH-IGF axis, Celen et al. conditionally delete one copy of Arid1b in the CNS and peripheral nervous system or in the liver by crossing Arid1bFl/+ mice with Nestin-Cre mice or Albumin-Cre mice, respectively. The Nestin-Cre; Arid1bFl/+ mice present with a similar growth impairment and a reduction in plasma IGF1 levels with no accompanying increase in GH. Albumin-Cre; Arid1bFl/+ mice do not demonstrate any significant differences in body size or in plasma IGF levels, when compared to controls. Therefore, nervous system-based haploinsufficiency of Arid1b is likely the cause of the growth retardation and GHRH-GH-IGF deficiencies observed in Arid1b heterozygous mice (Celen et al., 2017). It should be noted, however, that the Nestin-Cre mouse driver line has been reported to have hypopituitarism, decreased anxiety-like behavior and lower body weight (Galichet et al., 2010; Harno et al., 2013; Giusti et al., 2014; Declercq et al., 2015). As Celen et al. do not include the Cre-driver lines as controls in their conditional knockout experiments (Celen et al., 2017), these results should be cautiously interpreted until they can be independently confirmed. Celen et al. also attempt to treat the smaller body size and weight by correcting the apparent GHRH-GH-IGF deficiencies. They first treat Arid1b heterozygous mice with recombinant human IGF1, but this does not have any measurable effects on body weight or anxiety-like behavior. Treatment with recombinant mouse GH for 40 consecutive days, however, is sufficient to rescue the growth deficits and grip weakness in Arid1b haploinsufficient mice but has no measurable effect on anxiety-like behavior (Celen et al., 2017).

Concluding remarks/future directions

ARID1B research has made rapid advances in recent years, thanks in part to the development of Arid1b mutant mouse models. Because they closely recollect the behavioral effects of ARID1B mutations in the human population and resemble other ASD and ID mouse models, Arid1b mutant mice have the potential to provide profound insights into ARIDIB’s broad role in brain development and activity. Arid1b heterozygous mice may also continue to prove useful as preclinical models of excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in the brain.

Further research should continue to decipher the molecular mechanisms by which ARID1B regulates gene expression and, thus, brain function. Additionally, Arid1b heterozygous mice could be used to dissect neural circuits that regulate behaviors related to ASD and ID. Mouse models in which Arid1b can be conditionally deleted in specific neuronal subtypes will also provide more mechanistic insight, seeing as Arid1b homozygous mice do not survive postnatally (Celen et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2017; Shibutani et al., 2017). For example, we have already shown that hemizygous deletion of Arid1b in GABAergic interneurons recapitulates many of the behavioral abnormalities present in Arid1b heterozygous mice (Jung et al., 2017), but it may prove fruitful to further exam the effects of cell-type specific Arid1b deletion in other neuronal subsets. Drugs that influence histone modifiers may be another avenue worth exploring. Future studies are required to provide a better understanding of ARID1B’s gene regulatory mechanisms. Overall, ARID1B is critical in regulating proper nervous system development and behavior. Recent advances in technology and the utilization and sharing of large data sets will help provide the tools necessary for major breakthroughs in neurodevelopmental disorder research around ARID1B haploinsufficiency.

Highlights.

  • Arid1b haploinsufficiency leads to autistic behavior and intellectual dysfunction.

  • Arid1b haploinsufficiency causes E/I imbalance due to abnormal GABA interneurons.

  • Altered epigenetic modifications are associated with Arid1b haploinsufficiency.

  • GABA PAM rescues abnormal behaviors induced by Arid1b haploinsufficiency.

  • Recombinant growth hormone increases body size in Arid1b haploinsufficient mice.

Acknowledgments

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01NS091220 to Woo-Yang Kim.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Competing interests

None

References

  1. Alver BH, Kim KH, Lu P, Wang X, Manchester HE, Wang W, Haswell JR, Park PJ, Roberts CW (2017) The SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex is required for maintenance of lineage specific enhancers. Nat Commun 8:14648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong DD (2005) Neuropathology of Rett syndrome. J Child Neurol 20:747–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Attanasio C, Nord AS, Zhu Y, Blow MJ, Biddie SC, Mendenhall EM, Dixon J, Wright C, Hosseini R, Akiyama JA, Holt A, Plajzer-Frick I, Shoukry M, Afzal V, Ren B, Bernstein BE, Rubin EM, Visel A, Pennacchio LA (2014) Tissue-specific SMARCA4 binding at active and repressed regulatory elements during embryogenesis. Genome Res 24:920–929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Auerbach BD, Osterweil EK, Bear MF (2011) Mutations causing syndromic autism define an axis of synaptic pathophysiology. Nature 480:63–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bachmann C, Nguyen H, Rosenbusch J, Pham L, Rabe T, Patwa M, Sokpor G, Seong RH, Ashery-Padan R, Mansouri A, Stoykova A, Staiger JF, Tuoc T (2016) mSWI/SNF (BAF) Complexes Are Indispensable for the Neurogenesis and Development of Embryonic Olfactory Epithelium. PLoS Genet 12:e1006274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baio J et al. (2018) Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ 67:1–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baluch F, Itti L (2011) Mechanisms of top-down attention. Trends Neurosci 34:210–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T (2011) Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 21:381–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barker N, Hurlstone A, Musisi H, Miles A, Bienz M, Clevers H (2001) The chromatin remodelling factor Brg-1 interacts with beta-catenin to promote target gene activation. EMBO J 20:4935–4943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Basu SN, Kollu R, Banerjee-Basu S (2009) AutDB: a gene reference resource for autism research. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D832–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Belichenko PV, Oldfors A, Hagberg B, Dahlstrom A (1994) Rett syndrome: 3-D confocal microscopy of cortical pyramidal dendrites and afferents. Neuroreport 5:1509–1513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Benes FM, Berretta S (2001) GABAergic interneurons: implications for understanding schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 25:1–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bilousova TV, Dansie L, Ngo M, Aye J, Charles JR, Ethell DW, Ethell IM (2009) Minocycline promotes dendritic spine maturation and improves behavioural performance in the fragile X mouse model. J Med Genet 46:94–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bourne JN, Harris KM (2008) Balancing structure and function at hippocampal dendritic spines. Annu Rev Neurosci 31:47–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brandao JA, Romcy-Pereira RN (2015) Interplay of environmental signals and progenitor diversity on fate specification of cortical GABAergic neurons. Front Cell Neurosci 9:149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Butt SJ, Stacey JA, Teramoto Y, Vagnoni C (2017) A role for GABAergic interneuron diversity in circuit development and plasticity of the neonatal cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 43:149–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Celen C et al. (2017) Arid1b haploinsufficient mice reveal neuropsychiatric phenotypes and reversible causes of growth impairment. Elife 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chapleau CA, Larimore JL, Theibert A, Pozzo-Miller L (2009) Modulation of dendritic spine development and plasticity by BDNF and vesicular trafficking: fundamental roles in neurodevelopmental disorders associated with mental retardation and autism. J Neurodev Disord 1:185–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Choi J, Jeon S, Choi S, Park K, Seong RH (2015) The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex regulates germinal center formation by repressing Blimp-1 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E718–727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cohen IL, Fisch GS, Sudhalter V, Wolf-Schein EG, Hanson D, Hagerman R, Jenkins EC, Brown WT (1988) Social gaze, social avoidance, and repetitive behavior in fragile X males: a controlled study. Am J Ment Retard 92:436–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cvekl A, Duncan MK (2007) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation during lens development. Prog Retin Eye Res 26:555–597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dahlin MG, Amark PE, Nergardh AR (2003) Reduction of seizures with low-dose clonazepam in children with epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 28:48–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de la Serna IL, Carlson KA, Imbalzano An (2001) Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes promote MyoD-mediated muscle differentiation. Nat Genet 27:187–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Declercq J, Brouwers B, Pruniau VP, Stijnen P, de Faudeur G, Tuand K, Meulemans S, Serneels L, Schraenen A, Schuit F, Creemers JW (2015) Metabolic and Behavioural Phenotypes in Nestin-Cre Mice Are Caused by Hypothalamic Expression of Human Growth Hormone. PLoS One 10:e0135502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ding Q, Sethna F, Wang H (2014) Behavioral analysis of male and female Fmr1 knockout mice on C57BL/6 background. Behav Brain Res 271:72–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dobkin C, Rabe A, Dumas R, El Idrissi A, Haubenstock H, Brown WT (2000) Fmr1 knockout mouse has a distinctive strain-specific learning impairment. Neuroscience 100:423–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Eberharter A, Becker PB (2002) Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin. Second in review series on chromatin dynamics. EMBO Rep 3:224–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fiala JC, Spacek J, Harris KM (2002) Dendritic spine pathology: cause or consequence of neurological disorders? Brain Res Brain Res Rev 39:29–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fombonne E (1999) The epidemiology of autism: a review. Psychol Med 29:769–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gabriele M, Lopez Tobon A, D'Agostino G, Testa G (2018) The chromatin basis of neurodevelopmental disorders: Rethinking dysfunction along the molecular and temporal axes. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 84:306–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Galichet C, Lovell-Badge R, Rizzoti K (2010) Nestin-Cre mice are affected by hypopituitarism, which is not due to significant activity of the transgene in the pituitary gland. PLoS One 5:e11443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gao R, Penzes P (2015) Common mechanisms of excitatory and inhibitory imbalance in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Curr Mol Med 15:146–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Giusti SA, Vercelli CA, Vogl AM, Kolarz AW, Pino NS, Deussing JM, Refojo D (2014) Behavioral phenotyping of Nestin-Cre mice: implications for genetic mouse models of psychiatric disorders. J Psychiatr Res 55:87–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gogolla N, Leblanc JJ, Quast KB, Sudhof TC, Fagiolini M, Hensch TK (2009) Common circuit defect of excitatory-inhibitory balance in mouse models of autism. J Neurodev Disord 1:172–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Halgren C et al. (2012) Corpus callosum abnormalities, intellectual disability, speech impairment, and autism in patients with haploinsufficiency of ARID1B. Clin Genet 82:248–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Han S, Tai C, Jones CJ, Scheuer T, Catterall WA (2014) Enhancement of inhibitory neurotransmission by GABAA receptors having alpha2,3-subunits ameliorates behavioral deficits in a mouse model of autism. Neuron 81:1282–1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Harno E, Cottrell EC, White A (2013) Metabolic pitfalls of CNS Cre-based technology. Cell Metab 18:21–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Harris KM, Kater SB (1994) Dendritic spines: cellular specializations imparting both stability and flexibility to synaptic function. Annu Rev Neurosci 17:341–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Harris SW, Hessl D, Goodlin-Jones B, Ferranti J, Bacalman S, Barbato I, Tassone F, Hagerman PJ, Herman H, Hagerman RJ (2008) Autism profiles of males with fragile X syndrome. Am J Ment Retard 113:427–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ho L, Crabtree GR (2010) Chromatin remodelling during development. Nature 463:474–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoyer J, Ekici AB, Endele S, Popp B, Zweier C, Wiesener A, Wohlleber E, Dufke A, Rossier E, Petsch C, Zweier M, Gohring I, Zink AM, Rappold G, Schrock E, Wieczorek D, Riess O, Engels H, Rauch A, Reis A (2012) Haploinsufficiency of ARID1B, a member of the SWI/SNF-a chromatin-remodeling complex, is a frequent cause of intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet 90:565–572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Huttenlocher PR (1974) Dendritic development in neocortex of children with mental defect and infantile spasms. Neurology 24:203–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Imai T, Hattori H, Miyazaki M, Higuchi Y, Adachi S, Nakahata T (2001) Dandy-Walker variant in Coffin-Siris syndrome. Am J Med Genet 100:152–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Irwin SA, Idupulapati M, Gilbert ME, Harris JB, Chakravarti AB, Rogers EJ, Crisostomo RA, Larsen BP, Mehta A, Alcantara CJ, Patel B, Swain RA, Weiler IJ, Oostra BA, Greenough WT (2002) Dendritic spine and dendritic field characteristics of layer V pyramidal neurons in the visual cortex of fragile-X knockout mice. Am J Med Genet 111:140–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jentarra GM, Olfers SL, Rice SG, Srivastava N, Homanics GE, Blue M, Naidu S, Narayanan V (2010) Abnormalities of cell packing density and dendritic complexity in the MeCP2 A140V mouse model of Rett syndrome/X-linked mental retardation. BMC Neurosci 11:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jung EM, Moffat JJ, Liu J, Dravid SM, Gurumurthy CB, Kim WY (2017) Arid1b haploinsufficiency disrupts cortical interneuron development and mouse behavior. Nat Neurosci 20:1694–1707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ka M, Chopra DA, Dravid SM, Kim WY (2016) Essential Roles for ARID1B in Dendritic Arborization and Spine Morphology of Developing Pyramidal Neurons. J Neurosci 36:2723–2742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Katayama Y, Nishiyama M, Shoji H, Ohkawa Y, Kawamura A, Sato T, Suyama M, Takumi T, Miyakawa T, Nakayama KI (2016) CHD8 haploinsufficiency results in autistic-like phenotypes in mice. Nature 537:675–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kaufmann WE, Moser hW (2000) Dendritic anomalies in disorders associated with mental retardation. Cereb Cortex 10:981–991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kazdoba TM, Leach PT, Silverman JL, Crawley JN (2014) Modeling fragile X syndrome in the Fmr1 knockout mouse. Intractable Rare Dis Res 3:118–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kelsom C, Lu W (2013) Development and specification of GABAergic cortical interneurons. Cell Biosci 3:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim SY, Burris J, Bassal F, Koldewyn K, Chattarji S, Tassone F, Hessl D, Rivera SM (2014) Fear-specific amygdala function in children and adolescents on the fragile × spectrum: a dosage response of the FMR1 gene. Cereb Cortex 24:600–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kogan MD, Blumberg SJ, Schieve LA, Boyle CA, Perrin JM, Ghandour RM, Singh GK, Strickland BB, Trevathan E, van Dyck PC (2009) Prevalence of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder among children in the US, 2007. Pediatrics 124:1395–1403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kurdistani SK, Grunstein M (2003) Histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:276–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Larkum ME (2013) The yin and yang of cortical layer 1. Nat Neurosci 16:114–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lawrence M, Daujat S, Schneider R (2016) Lateral Thinking: How Histone Modifications Regulate Gene Expression. Trends Genet 32:42–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lawrence YA, Kempert TL, Bauman ML, Blatt GJ (2010) Parvalbumin-, calbindin-, and calretinin-immunoreactive hippocampal interneuron density in autism. Acta Neurol Scand 121:99–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lessard J, Wu JI, Ranish JA, Wan M, Winslow MM, Staahl BT, Wu H, Aebersold R, Graef IA, Crabtree GR (2007) An essential switch in subunit composition of a chromatin remodeling complex during neural development. Neuron 55:201–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Li F, Wan M, Zhang B, Peng Y, Zhou Y, Pi C, Xu X, Ye L, Zhou X, Zheng L (2018) Bivalent Histone Modifications and Development. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 13:83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Li W, Xiong Y, Shang C, Twu KY, Hang CT, Yang J, Han P, Lin CY, Lin CJ, Tsai FC, Stankunas K, Meyer T, Bernstein D, Pan M, Chang CP (2013) Brg1 governs distinct pathways to direct multiple aspects of mammalian neural crest cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:1738–1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lickert H, Takeuchi JK, Von Both I, Walls JR, McAuliffe F, Adamson SL, Henkelman RM, Wrana JL, Rossant J, Bruneau BG (2004) Baf60c is essential for function of BAF chromatin remodelling complexes in heart development. Nature 432:107–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Liebner S, Corada M, Bangsow T, Babbage J, Taddei A, Czupalla CJ, Reis M, Felici A, Wolburg H, Fruttiger M, Taketo MM, von Melchner H, Plate KH, Gerhardt H, Dejana E (2008) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling controls development of the blood-brain barrier. J Cell Biol 183:409–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Machado-Salas JP (1984) Abnormal dendritic patterns and aberrant spine development in Bourneville's disease--a Golgi survey. Clin Neuropathol 3:52–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Marin-Padilla M (1976) Pyramidal cell abnormalities in the motor cortex of a child with Down's syndrome. A Golgi study. J Comp Neurol 167:63–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. McKinney BC, Grossman AW, Elisseou NM, Greenough WT (2005) Dendritic spine abnormalities in the occipital cortex of C57BL/6 Fmr1 knockout mice. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 136B:98–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. McNaughton CH, Moon J, Strawderman MS, Maclean KN, Evans J, Strupp BJ (2008) Evidence for social anxiety and impaired social cognition in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Behav Neurosci 122:293–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Mehnert JM, Kelly WK (2007) Histone deacetylase inhibitors: biology and mechanism of action. Cancer J 13:23–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Mignot C et al. (2016) ARID1B mutations are the major genetic cause of corpus callosum anomalies in patients with intellectual disability. Brain 139:e64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Nagl NG Jr., Wang X, Patsialou A, Van Scoy M, Moran E (2007) Distinct mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes with opposing roles in cell-cycle control. EMBO J 26:752–763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Nelson SB, Valakh V (2015) Excitatory/Inhibitory Balance and Circuit Homeostasis in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Neuron 87:684–698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nord AS, Roeb W, Dickel DE, Walsh T, Kusenda M, O'Connor KL, Malhotra D, McCarthy SE, Stray SM, Taylor SM, Sebat J, Network SP, King B, King MC, McClellan JM (2011) Reduced transcript expression of genes affected by inherited and de novo CNVs in autism. Eur J Hum Genet 19:727–731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. O'Brien G, Pearson J (2004) Autism and learning disability. Autism 8:125–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ohkawa Y, Marfella CG, Imbalzano AN (2006) Skeletal muscle specification by myogenin and Mef2D via the SWI/SNF ATPase Brg1. EMBO J 25:490–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Olave I, Wang W, Xue Y, Kuo A, Crabtree GR (2002) Identification of a polymorphic, neuron-specific chromatin remodeling complex. Genes Dev 16:2509–2517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Paradee W, Melikian HE, Rasmussen DL, Kenneson A, Conn PJ, Warren ST (1999) Fragile X mouse: strain effects of knockout phenotype and evidence suggesting deficient amygdala function. Neuroscience 94:185–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Peier AM, McIlwain KL, Kenneson A, Warren ST, Paylor R, Nelson DL (2000) (Over)correction of FMR1 deficiency with YAC transgenics: behavioral and physical features. Hum Mol Genet 9:1145–1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Penzes P, Cahill ME, Jones KA, VanLeeuwen JE, Woolfrey KM (2011) Dendritic spine pathology in neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Neurosci 14:285–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Perou R et al. (2013) Mental health surveillance among children--United States, 2005-2011. MMWR Suppl 62:1–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Pietropaolo S, Guilleminot A, Martin B, D'Amato FR, Crusio WE (2011) Genetic-background modulation of core and variable autistic-like symptoms in Fmr1 knock-out mice. PLoS One 6:e17073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Pizzarelli R, Cherubini E (2011) Alterations of GABAergic signaling in autism spectrum disorders. Neural Plast 2011:297153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Pleasure SJ, Anderson S, Hevner R, Bagri A, Marin O, Lowenstein DH, Rubenstein JL (2000) Cell migration from the ganglionic eminences is required for the development of hippocampal GABAergic interneurons. Neuron 28:727–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Purpura G, Fulceri F, Puglisi V, Masoni P, Contaldo A (2016) Motor coordination impairment in children with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study using Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Checklist. Minerva Pediatr. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Richter SH, Garner JP, Wurbel H (2009) Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments? Nat Methods 6:257–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Roberts DA, Balderson D, Pickering-Brown SM, Deakin JF, Owen F (1996) The relative abundance of dopamine D4 receptor mRNA in post mortem brains of schizophrenics and controls. Schizophr Res 20:171–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Roeleveld N, Zielhuis GA, Gabreels F (1997) The prevalence of mental retardation: a critical review of recent literature. Dev Med Child Neurol 39:125–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Roidl D, Hacker C (2014) Histone methylation during neural development. Cell Tissue Res 356:539–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ronan JL, Wu W, Crabtree GR (2013) From neural development to cognition: unexpected roles for chromatin. Nat Rev Genet 14:347–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Santen GW, Clayton-Smith J, consortium ABC (2014) The ARID1B phenotype: what we have learned so far. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 166C:276–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Santen GW, Aten E, Sun Y, Almomani R, Gilissen C, Nielsen M, Kant SG, Snoeck IN, Peeters EA, Hilhorst-Hofstee Y, Wessels MW, den Hollander NS, Ruivenkamp CA, van Ommen GJ, Breuning MH, den Dunnen JT, van Haeringen A, Kriek M (2012) Mutations in SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex gene ARID1B cause Coffin-Siris syndrome. Nat Genet 44:379–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Santen GW et al. (2013) Coffin-Siris syndrome and the BAF complex: genotype-phenotype study in 63 patients. Hum Mutat 34:1519–1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Schrier Vergano S, Santen G, Wieczorek D, Wollnik B, Matsumoto N, Deardorff MA (1993) Coffin-Siris Syndrome In: GeneReviews((R)) (Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, eds). Seattle (WA). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Shahbazian MD, Grunstein M (2007) Functions of site-specific histone acetylation and deacetylation. Annu Rev Biochem 76:75–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Shibutani M, Horii T, Shoji H, Morita S, Kimura M, Terawaki N, Miyakawa T, Hatada I (2017) Arid1b Haploinsufficiency Causes Abnormal Brain Gene Expression and Autism-Related Behaviors in Mice. Int J Mol Sci 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Simonoff E, Pickles A, Chadwick O, Gringras P, Wood N, Higgins S, Maney JA, Karia N, Iqbal H, Moore A (2006) The Croydon Assessment of Learning Study: prevalence and educational identification of mild mental retardation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:828–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Singhal N, Graumann J, Wu G, Arauzo-Bravo MJ, Han DW, Greber B, Gentile L, Mann M, Scholer HR (2010) Chromatin-Remodeling Components of the BAF Complex Facilitate Reprogramming. Cell 141:943–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Sokpor G, Xie Y, Rosenbusch J, Tuoc T (2017) Chromatin Remodeling BAF (SWI/SNF) Complexes in Neural Development and Disorders. Front Mol Neurosci 10:243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Son EY, Crabtree GR (2014) The role of BAF (mSWI/SNF) complexes in mammalian neural development. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 166C:333–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Tsaneva-Atanasova K, Burgo A, Galli T, Holcman D (2009) Quantifying neurite growth mediated by interactions among secretory vesicles, microtubules, and actin networks. Biophys J 96:840–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Tsurusaki Y, Okamoto N, Ohashi H, Mizuno S, Matsumoto N, Makita Y, Fukuda M, Isidor B, Perrier J, Aggarwal S, Dalal AB, Al-Kindy A, Liebelt J, Mowat D, Nakashima M, Saitsu H, Miyake N, Matsumoto N (2014) Coffin-Siris syndrome is a SWI/SNF complex disorder. Clin Genet 85:548–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Tsurusaki Y et al. (2012) Mutations affecting components of the SWI/SNF complex cause Coffin-Siris syndrome. Nat Genet 44:376–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Turner AH, Greenspan KS, van Erp TGM (2016) Pallidum and lateral ventricle volume enlargement in autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 252:40–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Van Dam D, D'Hooge R, Hauben E, Reyniers E, Gantois I, Bakker CE, Oostra BA, Kooy RF, De Deyn PP (2000) Spatial learning, contextual fear conditioning and conditioned emotional response in Fmr1 knockout mice. Behav Brain Res 117:127–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. van Gaal S, Lamme VA (2012) Unconscious high-level information processing: implication for neurobiological theories of consciousness. Neuroscientist 18:287–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Vasileiou G, Ekici AB, Uebe S, Zweier C, Hoyer J, Engels H, Behrens J, Reis A, Hadjihannas MV (2015) Chromatin-Remodeling-Factor ARID1B Represses Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling. Am J Hum Genet 97:445–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Vecsey CG, Hawk JD, Lattal KM, Stein JM, Fabian SA, Attner MA, Cabrera SM, McDonough CB, Brindle PK, Abel T, Wood MA (2007) Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance memory and synaptic plasticity via CREB:CBP-dependent transcriptional activation. J Neurosci 27:6128–6140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Walsh P, Elsabbagh M, Bolton P, Singh I (2011) In search of biomarkers for autism: scientific, social and ethical challenges. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:603–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Weinberg P, Flames N, Sawa H, Garriga G, Hobert O (2013) The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex selectively affects multiple aspects of serotonergic neuron differentiation. Genetics 194:189–198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Westerinen H, Kaski M, Virta L, Almqvist F, Iivanainen M (2007) Prevalence of intellectual disability: a comprehensive study based on national registers. J Intellect Disabil Res 51:715–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Wieczorek D et al. (2013) A comprehensive molecular study on Coffin-Siris and Nicolaides-Baraitser syndromes identifies a broad molecular and clinical spectrum converging on altered chromatin remodeling. Hum Mol Genet 22:5121–5135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Wing L, Gould J (1979) Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: epidemiology and classification. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 9:11–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Wohr M, Orduz D, Gregory P, Moreno H, Khan U, Vorckel KJ, Wolfer DP, Welzl H, Gall D, Schiffmann SN, Schwaller B (2015) Lack of parvalbumin in mice leads to behavioral deficits relevant to all human autism core symptoms and related neural morphofunctional abnormalities. Transl Psychiatry 5:e525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Wright CF et al. (2015) Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data. Lancet 385:1305–1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wu J et al. (2016) Insertional Mutagenesis Identifies a STAT3/Arid1b/beta-catenin Pathway Driving Neurofibroma Initiation. Cell Rep 14:1979–1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Xiong Y, Li W, Shang C, Chen RM, Han P, Yang J, Stankunas K, Wu B, Pan M, Zhou B, Longaker MT, Chang CP (2013) Brg1 governs a positive feedback circuit in the hair follicle for tissue regeneration and repair. Dev Cell 25:169–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Yabe I, Soma H, Takei A, Fujik N, Sasaki H (2004) No association between FMR1 premutations and multiple system atrophy. J Neurol 251:1411–1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Yan Z, Wang Z, Sharova L, Sharov AA, Ling C, Piao Y, Aiba K, Matoba R, Wang W, Ko MS (2008) BAF250B-associated SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex is required to maintain undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 26:1155–1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Yu Y, Yao R, Wang L, Fan Y, Huang X, Hirschhorn J, Dauber A, Shen Y (2015) De novo mutations in ARID1B associated with both syndromic and non-syndromic short stature. BMC Genomics 16:701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES