Abstract
The aim of the study presented here was to evaluate retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS) compared with healthy controls and to analyze the impact of carotid endarterectomy using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). 25 eyes of 25 patients with CAS (study group) and 25 eyes of 25 healthy controls (control group) were prospectively included in this study. OCT-A was performed using RTVue XR Avanti (Optovue, Inc, Fremont, California, USA). The flow density data in the superficial and deep retinal OCT-angiogram of the macula and in the radial peripapillary capillary network (RPC) of the ONH were extracted and analyzed. The flow density in the superficial retinal OCT angiogram of the macula and in the ONH were significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group (macula: p = 0.003) (ONH: p = 0.013). The flow density in the ONH improved significantly after carotid endarterectomy (p = 0.004). A reduced flow density was observed in patients with CAS when compared with healthy controls. The flow density also improved after carotid endarterectomy. Quantitative changes in the microvascular density, as measured using OCT-A, could well be useful in the diagnosis of CAS and the evaluation of therapy success.
Introduction
Carotid artery stenosis is an important risk factor for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks1. Management of vascular risk factors, antiplatelet therapy and different surgical procedures (carotid endarterectomy, carotid angioplasty and stenting) are therapeutic options available for the management of carotid artery stenosis. Detection of stenosis of the carotid artery is therefore especially important in neurologically asymptomatic patients2–4. In current guidelines, the degree of stenosis is an important surrogate measure for stroke risk and indication for intervention. Various imaging technologies such as CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and/or duplex ultrasonography are therefore used to evaluate patients with CAS5,6.
Internal carotid artery stenosis can be associated with impaired ocular blood flow and retinal examination is generally performed in internal carotid artery stenosis patients when clinical ocular symptoms such as sudden or progressive visual loss occur7. However, chronic carotid artery stenosis is not necessarily associated with morphological or functional retinal damage7.
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a novel technology, providing high-resolution images of the retinal vasculature8. This method also enables quantitative evaluation of the retinal blood flow and blood flow in the optic nerve head (ONH)9–11.
The aim of the study presented here was to evaluate the retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion, as measured using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in patients with asymptomatic severe internal carotid artery stenosis compared to healthy controls, and to evaluate the impact of carotid endarterectomy.
Methods
Patients
For this prospective study 25 eyes of 25 patients suffering from internal carotid artery stenosis were consecutively enrolled. A control group of 25 eyes of 25 healthy subjects without ocular disease of any sort were also included. 18 patients were planned for surgical treatment and were evaluated before and after surgery. The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Muenster, North Rhine Westphalia, Germany. Before imaging, the study protocol was explained in detail and all participants signed an informed consent form.
Inclusion criteria were asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis ≥70% with perioperative risk <3% (Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association12), age over 18 years, and a planned surgical treatment.
Exclusion criteria were ocular symptoms (visual loss or visual impairment), media opacities preventing high-quality imaging, vitreoretinal disease or status post vitreoretinal surgery. Patients with neurological diseases, myocardial infarction or strokes were excluded. Patients with diabetes without diabetic retinopathy were included. The comorbidities of the study group and control group are summarized in Table 1 (Table 1).
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of the study groups.
| Study group | Control group | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | mean ± SD | ||
| n | 25 | 25 | |
| age (years) | 64.56 ± 7.23 | 64.76 ± 9.81 | 0.935 |
| sphericalequivalent (D) | 0.81 ± 1.16 | 0.52 ± 1.47 | 0.503 |
| IOD | 13.95 ± 2.39 | 15.25 ± 2.49 | 0.136 |
| visualacuity | 0.86 ± 0.17 | 0.89 ± 0.18 | 0.604 |
| comorbidity | |||
| diabetes | 2 | 2 | |
| art. hypertension | 21 | 7 | |
| hyperlipoproteinemia | 21 | 3 | |
Bold: statistically significant results.
Before imaging subjects were also asked to take a rest of about 5 minutes and systemic blood pressure was measured in the left brachial artery at the height of the heart with the subject in an upright sitting position. Subjects with systolic blood pressure (>150 mmHg/<100 mmHg) or diastolic blood pressure (>90 mmHg/ <60 mmHg) were not included.
Surgical Treatment
Surgical treatment was performed in the Department of Vascular Surgery at the University of Muenster Medical Center. Surgery was carried out under general anesthesia. After exposure of the carotid bifurcation and administration of a bolus of heparin, the internal, common and external carotid arteries were clamped. A shunt was placed to maintain perfusion of the intracranial vessels during the procedure and a meticulous removal of the plaque was performed. Depending on the anatomical characteristics of the bifurcation, an eversion endarterectomy with direct suture or a longitudinal endarterectomy with Dacron patch was carried out. All patients were postoperatively monitored in an intermediate care ward for at least 24 hours.
Examination
Before OCT-A imaging, patients underwent a complete ocular examination including refraction, IOP (intraocular pressure) measurement, slit lamp biomicroscopy and funduscopy. OCT-A imaging was performed before and 3–4 days after surgery. OCT-A imaging was performed using the AngioVue device (RTVue XR Avanti with AngioVue, OptovueInc, Fremont, California, USA). This system has an A-scan rate of 70,000 scans/second and the split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm was used to generate the angiography data. The OCT-A technology has been described in detail elsewhere9,11. Briefly, repeated OCT scans of a certain area are performed and the OCT images of that area evaluated to identify possible changes. Blood flow in the retinal vessels will result in changes between the successive OCT images, whereas static tissue will show no change11.
OCT-A imaging was performed in the same location by an expert examiner under the same conditions. Imaging of the optic nerve head (ONH) required a 4.5 × 4.5 mm2 scans while macula imaging required a 3.0 × 3.0 mm2 scan. Images of poor quality (lines or gaps arising from poor signal strength or motion artifacts) were excluded from the study. The software automatically segmented the tissue into 4 layers: in the ONH (optic nerve head, vitreous, radial peripapillary capillary (RPC), and choroid) and in the macula (superficial, deep, outer retina and choriocapillaris). After checking the segmentations, the flow density data in the optic nerve head (radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) layer and the macula (superficial and deep retinal OCT angiogram) were then extracted and analyzed.
Data analysis and statistics
Data management was performed using Microsoft Excel 2013. IBM SPSS® Statistics 22 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Somers, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The normality of the data distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. After confirmation of the normality assumption data are generally presented as mean ± standard deviation while changes at follow-up compared with baseline were assessed using paired sample t-tests. The two treatment groups were compared using independent Student’s t-tests. All inferential statistics are intended to be exploratory, not confirmatory, and are interpreted accordingly. The global statistical significance level was set to 0.05.
Results
25 patients with CAS (age: 64.56 ± 7.23) and 25 healthy control subjects (age: 64.76 ± 9.81) were prospectively included in the study. There was no statistically significant difference in age between the two groups (p = 0.94). Clinical characteristics of the study group and the control group are summarized in Table 1.
There was no significant difference between the signal strength indices (SSI) in the control group and the study group (SSI of the macula measurements: study group: 69.23 ± 7.57; control group: 69.81 ± 6.27; p = 0.78; SSI of the ONH measurements: study group: 63.78 ± 7.84, control group: 68.18 ± 4.32, p = 0.07).
The flow density (whole en face) in the superficial retinal OCT angiogram of the macula in patients with CAS was significantly lower compared with healthy controls (study group: 48.52 ± 4.46; control group: 51.88 ± 2.70; p = 0.003) (Fig. 1). Significant differences were also found in the ONH. The flow density data in the macula and ONH of the study group and the control group are summarized in Table 2.
Figure 1.
OCT angiograms of a patient with CAS (Top row) and a healthy control (Bottom row).
Table 2.
Flow density in the macula and optic nerve head of patients with CAS and of healthy controls.
| Study group | Control group | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | mean ± SD | ||
| OCT-A superficial | |||
| whole en face | 48.52 ± 4.46 | 51.88 ± 2.70 | 0.003 |
| fovea | 28.31 ± 7.95 | 28.84 ± 6.04 | 0.726 |
| parafovea | 50.72 ± 4.39 | 54.08 ± 2.57 | 0.002 |
| OCT-A deep | |||
| whole en face | 54.88 ± 4.44 | 55.07 ± 4.77 | 0.892 |
| fovea | 32.79 ± 8.31 | 31.81 ± 9.31 | 0.706 |
| parafovea | 57.03 ± 4.73 | 57.05 ± 5.41 | 0.989 |
| OCT-A RPC | |||
| whole en face | 51.53 ± 3.72 | 54.17 ± 3.43 | 0.013 |
| inside Disc | 40.02 ± 9.12 | 47.88 ± 6.61 | <0.001 |
| peripapillary | 58.96 ± 6.10 | 60.43 ± 5.43 | 0.376 |
Bold: statistically significant differences between the two groups.
In patients with CAS there were no significant differences in flow density between the ipsilateral and the contralateral eye at baseline (p > 0.05). The flow density (whole en face) in the RPC in the ipsilateral eyes, improved significantly after carotid endarterectomy. The flow density values in the ipsilateral eyes are summarized in Table 3 and the flow density values of the contralateral eyes in Table 4.
Table 3.
Flow density values obtained in the indicated regions in the ipsilateral eyes before and after carotid endarterectomy.
| n = 18 | preopertive | postoperative | Relative change (%) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | mean ± SD | |||
| OCT-A superficial | ||||
| whole en face | 50.21 ± 2.23 | 50.38 ± 2.32 | 0.34 | 0.720 |
| fovea | 30.82 ± 6.21 | 29.50 ± 5.36 | −4.28 | 0.238 |
| parafovea | 52.25 ± 2.69 | 52.29 ± 2.62 | 0.08 | 0.857 |
| OCT-A deep | ||||
| whole en face | 56.84 ± 2.12 | 56.57 ± 2.09 | −0.48 | 0.590 |
| fovea | 33.58 ± 8.36 | 32.13 ± 5.81 | −4.32 | 0.399 |
| parafovea | 59.08 ± 2.46 | 58.60 ± 2.63 | −0,81 | 0.483 |
| OCT-A RPC | ||||
| whole en face | 53.06 ± 2.69 | 54.59 ± 2.39 | 2.88 | 0.004 |
| inside Disc | 37.58 ± 8.60 | 39.03 ± 8.16 | 3.86 | 0.265 |
| peripapillary | 62.21 ± 2.12 | 63.62 ± 2.43 | 2.27 | 0.005 |
Bold: statistically significant differences.
Table 4.
Flow density values obtained in the indicated regions in the contralateral eyes before and after carotid endarterectomy.
| n = 18 | preopertive | postoperative | Relative change (%) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | mean ± SD | |||
| OCT-A superficial | ||||
| whole en face | 49.16 ± 4.28 | 49.53 ± 3.02 | 0.75 | 0.775 |
| fovea | 29.65 ± 5.74 | 29.89 ± 5.20 | 0.81 | 0.733 |
| parafovea | 51.15 ± 4.31 | 51.36 ± 3.37 | 0.41 | 0.847 |
| OCT-A deep | ||||
| whole en face | 55.28 ± 3.44 | 55.61 ± 4.41 | 0.60 | 0.956 |
| fovea | 32.17 ± 5.28 | 32.38 ± 5.57 | 0.65 | 0.578 |
| parafovea | 57.35 ± 3.34 | 57.66 ± 4.47 | 0.54 | 0.991 |
| OCT-A RPC | ||||
| whole en face | 52.69 ± 3.86 | 54.54 ± 3.30 | 3.51 | 0.004 |
| inside Disc | 36.87 ± 9.72 | 38.86 ± 7.26 | 5.40 | 0.233 |
| peripapillary | 62.22 ± 3.18 | 63.90 ± 3.29 | 2.70 | 0.003 |
Bold: statistically significant differences.
Discussion
This pilot study is the first to determine reduced flow density in patients with CAS compared with healthy controls using OCT-A. OCT-A is non-invasive and can be performed easily and fast. It enables visualization of blood flow in the retina and ONH without intravenously injected dye. This technology has attracted a great deal of clinical research interest over the last two years and is finding increasing use in clinical practice9. OCTA also enables quantitative analysis of flow density in the retina and optic nerve head and has been assessed in various ocular and systemic diseases9,10,13–16. The reproducibility of the quantitative analysis of flow density has been evaluated in healthy subjects and in patients with different ocular diseases9,10,14.
Various studies in the literature have evaluated morphological and functional ophthalmological parameters in patients with CAS compared with healthy controls: Sayin et al. found a decreased choroidal thickness in patients with CAS, while in the same study no significant difference was found in the thicknesses of the retinal nerve fiber layer, macula or ganglion cell complex17. Whereas Heßler et al. also failed to find a significantly reduced RNFL thickness in patients with CAS7, a community-based study recently published by Wang et al. does describe reduced RNFL thicknesses in patients with CAS4. In functional tests, Kofoed et al. described significantly reduced and delayed electroretinographic responses in patients with carotid artery stenosis18.
Stenosis of the carotid artery leads to a fall in ocular blood flow7,19–21. In our study, patients with CAS showed a reduced flow density in the RPC layer of the ONH and in the superficial retinal OCT-angiogram when compared with healthy controls. In the superficial retinal OCT-angiogram the differences in the parafovea and in the entire evaluated area (whole en face) were significant whereas the difference in the fovea did not reach the significance level. This could be explained by interindividual variation in the area of the FAZ (higher SD in the fovea when compared with parafovea)22. The difference between the two groups in the deep retinal OCT-angiogram was also not significant. However, the analysis of flow density values in the deep retinal OCT-angiogram should be interpreted with caution, since the quantification of flow density in the deep retinal OCT angiogram is more challenging, being affected by projection artefacts, and repeatability was found to be weaker compared with that of the superficial retinal OCT-angiogram in previous studies11,23–25.
Most of the patients included in our study had a bilateral CAS. Therefore there were no significant differences between the flow density of the ipsilateral eye and the contralateral eye at baseline. After carotid endarterectomy the flow density improved significantly in the ipsilateral and in the contralateral eye. Carotid revascularization surgery improves cerebral perfusion and has a positive effect on the contralateral cerebral blood flow through the collateral circulation26–28. The positive effect of carotid endarterectomy on the ipsilateral retinal blood flow has been reported before21. Lareyre et al. also demonstrated bilaterally increased choroidal thickness using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) in patients with CAS after carotid endarterectomy26. Lareyre et al. hypothesized that EDI OCT could be a potential marker for the assessment of cerebral and/or ocular perfusion after carotid endarterectomy26. An important issue to consider in this context is that collateral pathways through the ophthalmic artery may be recruited to compensate for diminished cerebral blood flow in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis5. Although OCT-A is fast, non-invasive, accurate and reproducible an important limitation of OCT-A that should be mentioned here is the absence of flow direction.
This pilot study is also limited by the small sample size and short follow-up period. Further studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period are now required to evaluate whether OCT-A could be useful as a potential marker in the diagnosis of CAS and the evaluation of treatment success.
To conclude patients with CAS showed a reduced flow density in the RPC layer (ONH) and in the superficial retinal OCT-angiogram when compared with healthy controls. The flow density improved significantly after surgical treatment (carotid endarterectomy). Measurement of OCT-A and quantitative analyses of flow density could represent a useful, fast, non-invasive and objective approach to diagnosis of CAS and evaluation of treatment success.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support by Open Access Publication Fund of University of Muenster. There are no funders to report for this submission.
Author Contributions
L.L., E.M., G.P. and M.A. designed the study. N.E. and G.T. provided resources. L.L., E.M. administered and M.A. supervised the study. L.L., E.M., G.P., P.N., F.S., N.M. recruited the patients. L.L., E.M., G.P., P.N., F.S., N.M. performed investigation and formal analysis. L.L., E.M. and M.A. performed data visualization. L.L., E.M. and M.A. evaluated data. L.L., E.M. and M.A. wrote the first draft of the manuscript with input of G.P., P.N., F.S., N.M., N.E. and G.T. All authors critically revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and all authors shared final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Larissa Lahme and Elena Marchiori contributed equally.
References
- 1.Fairhead JF, Rothwell PM. The need for urgency in identification and treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis is already established. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;19:355–358. doi: 10.1159/000085201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Warlow C, Farrell B, Fraser A, Sandercock P, Slattery J. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) The Lancet. 1998;351(9113):1379–1387. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Inzitari Domenico, Eliasziw Michael, Gates Peter, Sharpe Brenda L., Chan Richard K.T., Meldrum Heather E., Barnett Henry J.M. The Causes and Risk of Stroke in Patients with Asymptomatic Internal-Carotid-Artery Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;342(23):1693–1701. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006083422302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang Dandan, Li Yang, Zhou Yong, Jin Cheng, Zhao Qi, Wang Anxin, Wu Shouling, Wei Wen Bin, Zhao Xingquan, Jonas Jost B. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. A community-based, observational study. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Montorsi P, Galli S, Ravagnani PM, Roffi M. Symptomatic Carotid Artery Disease: Revascularization. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;59(6):601–611. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brinjikji W, et al. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(1):27–42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heßler H, et al. No Evidence for Retinal Damage Evolving from Reduced Retinal Blood Flow in Carotid Artery Disease. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:604028. doi: 10.1155/2015/604028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Savastano Maria Cristina, Lumbroso Bruno, Rispoli Marco. IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF RETINAL VASCULARIZATION MORPHOLOGY USING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY. Retina. 2015;35(11):2196–2203. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kashani AH, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;2017(60):66–100. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alnawaiseh, M., Schubert, F., Heiduschka, P. & Eter, N. Optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Retina. 2017 Oct 24. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. 2015;35(11):2163–80. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Meschia JF, et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American. Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:3754. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Treder M, Lauermann JL, Alnawaiseh M, Heiduschka P, Eter N. Quantitative changes in flow density in patients with adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy: an OCT angiography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(1):23–28. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3815-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Al-Sheikh M, Tepelus TC, Nazikyan T, Sadda SR. Repeatability of automated vessel density measurements using optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(4):449–452. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alnawaiseh, M., Lahme, L., Müller, V., Rosentreter, A., Eter, N. Correlation of flow density, as measured using optical coherence tomography angiography, with structural and functional parameters in glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 13. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Brand, C. et al. Aberrant ocular architecture and function in patients with Klinefelter syndrome. Sci Rep. Oct 13 7(1), 13130 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Sayin N, Kara N, Uzun F, Akturk IF. A quantitative evaluation of the posterior segment of the eye using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in carotid artery stenosis: a pilot study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015;46(2):180–5. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20150213-20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kofoed PK, et al. Cone pathway function in relation to asymmetric carotid artery stenosis: correlation to blood pressure. Acta Ophthalmol. Dec. 2013;91(8):728–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Enaida H, et al. Changes in chorioretinal blood flow velocity and cerebral blood flow after carotid endarterectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016;60(6):459–465. doi: 10.1007/s10384-016-0472-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Costa VP, et al. Clinical findings and hemodynamic changes associated with severe occlusive carotid artery disease. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(12):1994–2002. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30066-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cardia G, Porfido D, Guerriero S, Loizzi D, Giancipoli G. Retinal circulation after carotid artery revascularization. Angiology. 2011;62(5):372–375. doi: 10.1177/0003319710386472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fujiwara Atsushi, Morizane Yuki, Hosokawa Mio, Kimura Shuhei, Shiode Yusuke, Hirano Masayuki, Doi Shinichiro, Toshima Shinji, Takahashi Kosuke, Hosogi Mika, Shiraga Fumio. Factors affecting foveal avascular zone in healthy eyes: An examination using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0188572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Spaide RF, Curcio CA. Evaluation of Segmentation of the Superficial and Deep Vascular Layers of the Retina by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Instruments in Normal Eyes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(3):259–262. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Al-Sheikh M, GhasemiFalavarjani K, Akil H, Sadda SR. Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2017;15(3):13. doi: 10.1186/s40942-017-0068-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fenner, B. J. et al. Identification of imaging features that determine quality and repeatability of retinal capillary plexus density measurements in OCT angiography. Br. J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 16. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Lareyre, F. et al. Changes in Ocular Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness After Carotid Endarterectomy Using Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography: A Pilot Study. Angiology. 3319717737223 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Matsubara S, et al. Analysis of cerebral perfusion and metabolism assessed with positron emission tomography before and after carotid artery stenting. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(1):28–36. doi: 10.3171/2008.09.17663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yun TJ, et al. Effect of carotid artery stenting on cerebral blood flow: evaluation of hemodynamic changes using arterial spin labeling. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(3):271–281. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1104-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and all authors shared final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.