Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2018;19(9):2591–2597. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.9.2591

Effects of Exergaming in Cancer Related Fatigue in the Quality of Life and Electromyography of the Middle Deltoid of People with Cancer in Treatment: A Controlled Trial

Paulo Furtado de Oliveira 1,2, Denise Hollanda Iunes 1,3, Ricardo Silva Alves 2, Jovana Maria de Carvalho 1, Flávia da Silva Menezes 1, Leonardo César Carvalho 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC6249443  PMID: 30256065

Abstract

Objective:

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effects an exergaming protocol for cancer patients who undergo or have already undergone cancer treatment. We sought to evaluate changes in cancer-related fatigue, function, and ability to perform daily activities, in addition to changes in the electromyographic pattern of the middle deltoid muscle.

Methods:

We conducted a controlled trial. Nineteen volunteers in the cancer group (aged 61 ± 9 years; body mass index28 ± 5) and 19 in the control group (aged 58 ± 8 years); body mass index 28 ± 4) participated in the study. They were evaluated by means of a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire, and surface electromyography in the deltoid muscle at three moments: before the beginning of the exergaming protocol, after 10 training sessions, and after 20 sessions. The protocol consisted of practicing exergaming using Xbox 360® (Microsoft, Redmond, USA) with Kinect®. The game “Your Shape Fitness Evolved” (Ubisoft, Rennes, France) was used.

Results:

Total FACIT-F scores, fatigue subscale scores, and median frequency values observed in the cancer group were lower than those in the control group. These values improved in relation to the initial evaluation in the cancer group after the practice of the exergaming protocol.

Conclusion:

The exergaming protocol used in this study was effective for reducing reported symptoms of fatigue, increasing perceived quality of life, and improving the pattern of deltoid muscle contraction in cancer patients.

Keywords: Fatigue, exergaming, quality of life, eletromiography, rehabilitation

Introduction

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in developed countries and the third in developing countries (WHO, 2003). The most prevalent side effect of cancer treatment is fatigue (Jones et al., 2015; Shapiro and Recht, 2001). Fatigue affects cancer patients from the beginning to the end of treatment, persisting for years and negatively impacting quality of life (Jones et al., 2015; Hampson et al., 2015).

The definition of cancer-related fatigue (CRF), according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, is the “persistent and distressing physical, emotional, and/or cognitive exhaustion or fatigue related to cancer or its treatment that is not proportional the recent activities performed and interfere in their normal function” (Mock et al., 2000).

Fatigue is present at the time of diagnosis in 50–75% of cancer patients. Among patients undergoing chemotherapy, this prevalence increases to 80–96%, and the rate is 60–93% among patients undergoing radiotherapy (Stasi et al., 2003).

Treatments for CRF include psychotherapy, physiotherapy, therapy for sleep disturbances, nutritional adequacy, and pharmacological treatment (Franc et al., 2014). Research has found that regular physical activity (measured weekly) is positively associated with reduction in CRF symptoms in individuals with cancer (Huang et al., 2010; Spence et al., 2010; Cramp and Byron-Daniel, 2012). Physical activity should be light at first, and individuals’ reactions should guide increases in intensity to maintain patient safety (Wollin et al., 2012; Schimitz et al., 2010).

Performing exercises using videogames, or exergaming, demands attention and motivation, and it promotes a feeling of task accomplishment in users. Therefore, it is used as a form of entertainment that can assist patients in adhering to CRF treatment protocols (Kuys et al., 2011; Chang et al., 2013). Exergaming is a physical activity of mild to moderate intensity, requiring coordinated movement of all body parts, thus using different muscle groups (Peng et al., 2011). Therefore, because it is also a pleasant activity, exergaming is a viable alternative for CRF treatment (Harvard Health Publishing, 2012).

Therefore, this study evaluated an exergaming protocol for cancer patients who undergo or have already undergone treatment. The aim was to determine whether patients’ self-reported fatigue, function, and ability to perform daily activities changed after the exergaming protocol. The study also examined whether the exergaming protocol was followed by changes the electromyographic pattern of the middle deltoid muscle.

Materials and Methods

This is a controlled study conducted between June, 2015, and October, 2016. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Alfenas (Protocols numbers 923.589; 1.366.215) and registered in the Registration Platform of Clinical Trials (RBR-9t48g5).

For convenience, participants were assigned to two groups: a cancer group (n =19) and a control group (n = 19). The cancer group was recruited in the Oncology department of the Santa Casa de Alfenas hospital, and the control group at the Physiotherapy Clinic of the Federal University of Alfenas - Minas Gerais State (MG).

The inclusion criteria for the cancer group were: age between 18 and 80 years, good ability to understand the methods of evaluation and training, clinical diagnosis of any type of cancer in stage 0 to III, undergoing or having previously undergone radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and medically cleared for the practice of physical activity. The control group had the same inclusion criteria, but could not have had a medical diagnosis of cancer until the end of the study.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: presence of orthopedic lesion in the shoulder with signs and symptoms active in the last six months, presence of nerve damage that impairs upper limb motility, reduction limb activity that prevents participation in the exergaming protocol, presence of infectious disease, presence of cutaneous lesions that make evaluation impossible, incapable of voluntary movement of the upper limbs, and incapable of performing isotonic exercises. Those who, for any reason, refused to sign the free and informed consent form were also excluded.

All the evaluations were performed by a different evaluator that didn’t participate in the interventions and did not know which group the volunteer participated in. The interventions were realized by the other researchers. All the researchers were physiotherapists very experienced in rehabilitation of cancer patients. This study was carried out at the Human Movement Analysis Laboratory of the Federal University of Alfenas - MG. A preliminary evaluation was carried out by means of a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire. Then, an inspection and palpation was performed on the upper limb, anterior trunk, and posterior trunk in order to observe changes such as hyperemia, cyanosis, spots, fibrosis, feverish state, or any other dermal alteration.

CRF and the quality of life were evaluated using the full score and the fatigue subscale of a Portuguese translation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire, which is a validated instrument designed to evaluate fatigue and the quality of life of cancer patients. The questionnaire covers five domains: physical well-being (7 items), social and family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional concerns or fatigue subscale (13 items). The fatigue subscale is used as an evaluator of the presence of the symptoms, and higher scores indicate lower self-perception of symptoms. The overall FACIT-F score consists of the sum of the scores of the five domains and evaluates patients’ quality of life, where a higher score indicates better quality-of-life indices (Ishikawa et al., 2010).

A Trigno 8 Channel Wireless electromyograph (Delsys Inc., Natick, USA) and EMG Works Acquisition software (Delsys Inc., Natick, USA) were used for muscle fatigue analysis. The median frequency data were analyzed during the isometric contraction test.

The electrode was positioned on an imaginary line between the acromion and the lateral epicondyle, in the region of greater muscle belly of the deltoid muscle, after tricotomy (if necessary) and skin cleaning with 70% alcohol, as recommended by Surface-EMG for The Non Invasive Assessment of Muscle (SENIAM 8, 2015).

For the test, participants were seated in a rigid chair, with the upper limb to be tested at approximately 90º, where the middle deltoid muscle is highly activated (Witte et al., 2014). Patients were encouraged to perform an abduction of the shoulder against a load cell, maintaining maximum force throughout the test. The test was terminated if the patient could not maintain maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) for 60 seconds from the start of the test (Grange and Houston, 1991). This test was performed three times, with a 5-minute interval between tests (De Luca et al., 1983). Prior to the test, participants were verbally and visually instructed in the correct manner of performing the test, using a demonstration by the assessor. The volunteer was verbally encouraged to achieve maximum strength through the command (“Force, Force”).

Muscle contraction patterns were graphically analyzed through the evaluation of the median frequency during the test. The first and the last 5 seconds were excluded in order to minimize the effects of the verbal command on the muscular contraction, resulting in 50-second tests for evaluation. The mean of the three trials was considered for MVIC analysis (Heinonen et al., 1994).

After the first evaluation, participants completed 10 exergaming sessions, followed by a second evaluation, then a further 10 sessions of the proposed exergaming protocol, and, finally, a third evaluation using the same evaluation instruments.

Initially, the volunteers were positioned in front of a 42” LED television equipped with the Xbox 360® (Microsoft, Redmond) console with Kinect®. The game “Your Shape Fitness Evolved” was used, with the subgames called “Stomp It” and “Wall Breaker”. The subgame “Wall Breaker” has the objective of breaking blocks with the upper limbs. Players are scored as a function of execution time, with higher scores being obtained with faster execution. The initial duration is 1.5 minutes, and 10 seconds are added for each group of broken blocks. The average game duration is 2 minutes, and the protocol asked participants to repeat the game 9 times. The subgame “Stomp It” has the objective of executing a movement with the lower limbs, indicated by lights on the screen demonstrating different positions. The resulting movement resembles a dance. Again, the average game duration is 2 minutes, and the protocol asked participants to repeat the game 9 times. These exercises were chosen because they encourage aerobic exercise, which is effective in reducing fatigue in cancer patients (Cramp and Byron-Daniel, 2012). Participants performed 20 sessions each, with progressive game duration according to their tolerance to the exercise, reaching a maximum of 50 minutes, including the duration of the games and the rest time between games. Participants performed the exergaming protocol two or three times per week, for a total study duration of 8–10 weeks. Before the study began, all participants were briefed on the games and console handling.

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM Corp., Chicago, USA), version 20.0 was used for statistical analysis of the data. The variables were analyzed by means of the intention-to-treat (ITT) method, demonstrated through a flow chart of the study design (Figure 1). Initially, the data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, obtaining the values of mean, standard deviation, and confidence intervals. Then, all datasets were tested for their normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, using a significance level of 5%. To analyze differences in the variables (a) age and (b) body mass index (BMI), the independent t test was used, and for the variables (c) sex, (d) practice of physical activity, (e) smoking, and (f) alcoholism, the chi-squared test was used.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study design

For the independent variables, when the normal distribution criterion was met, Student’s t tests were carried out for independent samples; if the statistical assumption criteria were not met, the corresponding non-parametric alternative, the Mann-Whitney U test, was used for intergroup comparison. For both tests, a significance level of 5% was used.

Regarding the dependent variables, when both criteria were met (normal distribution and homoscedasticity), a Student’s t test was performed for dependent samples and, when any criterion was not met, the non-parametric alternative, Wilcoxon test, was used for the intragroup comparison, using a significance level of 5% for both tests.

The effect of the intervention was compared between the groups by means of a two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) model when the criterion of normality was met. When normality was not met, the corresponding nonparametric alternative, Friedman test with two factors (group and evaluations), was used, with a significance level of 5% for both tests. The comparisons for the variables which is normal were performed using the Bonferroni test.

For the normal variables, the statistical power of the results given the sample size was calculated, with a high power defined as 0.8 or above.

Results

The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample of the present study are presented in Table 1. The independent t test revealed no significant differences between the groups with respect to age (p = 0.301) or body mass index (p = 0.707). The chi-squared test revealed no significant differences with respect to sex (p = 0.426), physical activity (p = 0.721), smoking (p = 0.146), or alcoholism (p = 0.311).

Table 1.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Study Participants

Characteristics Cancer Group (n = 19) Control Group (n = 19)
Age (years) 61.46 ± 8.79 57.62 ± 7.57
Body Mass Index 28.36 ± 4.94 28.06 ± 3.74
Sex
 Male- n (%) 3 (15.79) 5 (26,32)
 Female- n (%) 16 (84.21) 14 (73,68)
Cancer diagnosis (months) 49.78 ± 39.40
Performs physical activity- n(%) 5 (26.32) 6 (31.58)
Smoking- n (%) 0 2 (10.52)
Alcoholism- n (%) 0 1 (5.26)
Cancer diagnosis site- n (%)
 Gastrointestinal tract 2 (10.52)
 Breast 9 (47.37)
 Abdomino-pelvic 1 (5.26)
 Ovary 2 (10.52)
 Uterus 2 (10.52)
 Prostate 2 (10.52)
 Oropharynx 2 (10.52)
Stage- n (%)
 0 0
 I 3 (15.79)
 II 9 (47.37)
 III 2 (10.52)
 IV 0
 No data 5 (26.32)
Chemotherapeutic drug- n (%)
 Antibiotics 1 (11.1)
 Platinum 2 (22.2)
 Taxanes 6 (66.7)
Types of treatment performed-n (%)
 Just surgery 1 (5.26)
 Just chemotherapy 0
 Just radiotherapy 2 (10.52)
 Surgery and chemotherapy 4 (21.05)
 Surgery and radiotherapy 1 (5.26)
 Chamotherapy and radiotherapy 1 (5.26)
 All 10 (52.65)

Mean ± standard deviation; % , percentages; n, number of members.

The fatigue subscale scores and the FACIT-F scores are described in Table 2. The cancer group obtained lower fatigue subscale scores relative to the control during the initial evaluation (p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant increase in the cancer group for the fatigue subscale, when the scores between the first evaluation and the two subsequent ones were compared (evaluation 1 vs. 2: p = 0.003; evaluation 1 vs. 3: p = 0.003). For the FACIT-F score, the cancer group had statistically lower values than those in the control group in all evaluations (evaluation 1: p = 0.001; evaluation 2: p = 0.002; evaluation 3: p = 0.007), although the FACIT-F score of the cancer group increased from the first to the two following evaluations (evaluation 1 vs. 2: p = 0.005; evaluation 1 vs. 3: p = 0.003) and from the second to the last evaluation (evaluation 2 vs. 3: p = 0.04).

Table 2.

Comparative Analysis of Scores (mean ± Standard Deviation) Obtained in the Fatigue Subscale and FACIT-F Questionnaire of Cancer and Control Groups at the Moments of Evaluation

Variables Groups Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 Evaluation 3 P (G*E) P (E)
Fatigue Subscale Cancer 40.26 ± 6.69& 44.10 ± 7.75* 44.36 ± 8.13* 0.003 0.001
Control 48.05 ± 4.45 48.05 ± 4.33 48.10 ± 4.34 0.926
FACIT-F Cancer 117.04 ± 23.74& 124.58 ± 27.36&* 127.45 ± 28.02&*# 0.001 0.001
Control 145.31 ± 10.58 146.94 ± 9.47 146.68 ± 9.30 0.089

Intragroups: Wilcoxon test – *vs. evaluation 1; # vs. evaluation 2; p < 0.05; Intergroups, Mann Whitney U test – & vs. control; p < 0.05; G*E, Friedman test two factors (groups and evaluations) ;E, Friedman test with evaluation factor

Table 3 shows the mean values and standard deviations of bilateral middle deltoid muscle performance of the cancer and control groups at the evaluation moments. Among the groups, it is possible to observe lower values of the median frequency of the cancer group compared with the control group in all evaluations for the right upper limb, and in the first and last evaluation for the upper left limb. In addition, for the cancer group, an increase in the median frequency from the second to the last evaluation was observed in the right upper limb.

Table 3.

Comparative Analysis of the Median Frequency Values (Hz) (Mean ± Standard Deviation) of the Mean of Deltoid Muscles of the Cancer and Control Groups at the Moments of Evaluation

Groups Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 Evaluation 3 P (G*E) Power P (E) Power P (G) Power
R Cancer 59.12 ± 14.07& 59.61 ± 14.07& 62.38 ± 13.29&# 0.523 0.156 0.013 0.765 0.005 0.825
(52.34–65.91) (53.10–66.12) (55.97–68.79)
Control 69.41 ± 8.27 70.82 ± 7.64 71.54 ± 6.99
(65.42–73.40) (67.13–74.50) (68.17–74.91)
L Cancer 60.98 ± 13.89& 63.57 ± 14.09 64.48 ± 12.92& 0.204 0.332 0.198 0.338 0.017 0.684
(54.28–67.68) (56.77–70.36) (58.26–70.71)
Control 71.85 ± 8.45 70.68 ± 8.21 72.32 ± 8.24
(67.78–75.92) (66.72–74.64) (68.35–76.29)

R, Right; L, Left; G*E, ANOVA groups and evaluation factors; E, ANOVA evaluation factor; G, ANOVA group factor; Bonferroni – # vs. Evaluation 2; & vs. control; p < 0.05

Discussion

Perceived fatigue and quality of life are important for comparative analysis of the effects of treatments on cancer patients. These factors can help in making decisions about continuity and future treatments, in addition to possible palliative care (Yellen et al., 1997).

People diagnosed with cancer who undergo chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery have higher rates of perceived fatigue during and after treatment (Curt et al., 2000; Rubin et al., 2004). In the present study, most of the participants with cancer underwent these procedures together and initially presented a lower score for the fatigue subscale and for the FACIT-F questionnaire, demonstrating a higher level of fatigue, lower level of function and ability to perform activities of daily living in this group.

In general, aging results in deterioration of the physiological systems. In a study involving young women affected by cancer, they show a greater presence of fatigue when compared to older women regardless of the type of cancer (Smith et al., 2013, Sekse et al., 2015).

In another study, women surviving from breast cancer have a correlation between age and the presence of fatigue. In our study, these variables were not correlated, since it was not the purpose of the study (Tabrizi, Alizadeh, 2017). However, we believe that due to the fact that the volunteers have adult characteristics, they could even report a greater presence of fatigue independently from the presence of cancer, but this would not influence the results of the study since the age profile between the groups does not show a significant statistical difference.

After the exergaming protocol, the FACIT-F scores increased significantly at the end of the evaluations, suggesting an improvement in the symptoms of fatigue and in the function and activities of daily living. These findings are similar to those of other authors, who demonstrate an increase in FACIT-F score after aerobic exercise in people with cancer diagnosis (Cramp and Byron-Daniel, 2012; Meneses-Echávez et al., 2015). However, previous studies did not use devices that encourage physical activity in a virtual way. It was also observed that the volunteers with cancer had significantly lower mean bilateral frequency values than the control, also consistent with the literature (Yavuzsen et al., 2009), which demonstrates the influence of the peripheral nervous system on the fatigue mechanism as evaluated in another muscle group (Alves et al., 2017). The pattern of muscle fiber distribution of the deltoid also makes it more susceptible to metabolic changes derived from a constant muscle contraction period, contributing to changes in the electromyographic signal spectrum (Bouissou et al., 1985; Stallknecht et al., 1998; Komi and Tesch, 1979).

There was an increase in the median frequency values of the last evaluation of the right middle deltoid muscle in relation to the previous evaluation, a fact that did not occur in the other limbs. One factor that may have influenced this response is muscle memory. Muscle cells maintain their nuclei even after disuse atrophy, favoring muscle recovery according to its previous characteristics after the resumption of stimulus (Bruusgaard and Gundersen, 2008; Bruusgaard et al., 2010; Bruusgaard et al., 2012). This could correspond to a faster response of the muscles of the dominant limb to the activity promoted by the exergame; the non-dominant limb could require more stimulation to obtain the same result. However, dominance was not measured in the present study. Perelle and Ehrman (1994) showed that the majority of the population had right-side dominance.

Exergaming consists of controlled physical activity that motivates patients and promotes increased intensity without perceived exertion (Kho et al., 2012; Schneider and Hood, 2007). With improved physical abilities and reduced fatigue symptoms, quality of life tends to improve among the cancer group in this study (Cramp and Byron-Daniel, 2012). However, despite the improvement in the FACIT-F result, the cancer group did not reach scores similar to those in the control group. It is possible that the offered stimulus may not produce effects similar to the practice of other physical activity modalities (Comello et al., 2016).

Therapy with the use of videogames has the advantage of distracting the patient, thus reducing anxiety and pain levels and encouraging greater treatment adherence (Leutwyler et al., 2014; Chirico et al., 2016). Because exergaming is pleasurable, there is less perception of effort and time required for task accomplishment. In addition, exergaming incentivizes users to increase the intensity of the exercise to achieve higher scores in the game (Kho et al., 2012; Schneider and Hood, 2007). The improvement in the variables evaluated after the exergaming protocol demonstrates that this is a valid way to improve deltoid muscle activation, as well as to reduce self-reported fatigue and improve quality of life in cancer patients, suggesting that the practice of exergaming may be a viable and reliable alternative in the clinical setting.

The study has some limitations, among them the fact that we did not control for possible etiology of fatigue symptoms, such as changes in hematological factors.

Because the study did not take place in a center for the treatment of cancer, there was great difficulty in obtaining a satisfactory sample, which could influence the results. This explains the heterogeneity of cancers obtained in the cancer group, as well as the types of treatment that participants underwent.

In addition, an analysis of intensity of physical activity during exergaming practice could have been used to monitor volunteers’ responses to the effort. Future studies will be needed to better elucidate these still-obscure issues.

The protocol of 20 exergaming sessions used in this study changed the perception of reported symptoms of fatigue, increasing the perceived quality of life, and improving the MDF values in cancer patients, regardless of the stage of the treatment. This therapeutic tool was effective to restore the differences initially found in the perception of fatigue and the patterns of the deltoid muscle contraction between cancer and control groups. This is important because the practice of exergames is relatively inexpensive and easy to use and may be a valid alternative for the treatment of CRF.

Funding

This study was supported by the Foundation for Research of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), under APQ: 03580-13, APQ 01955-14 and Oncology Network of State of Minas Gerais- FAPEMIG, under RED - 11-14 for their support.

Trial registration

Registry of Clinical Trials Platform (RBR-9t48g5).

Statement conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

The researchers thank all the participants for volunteering for the study and the Universidade Federal de Alfenas for their support. The authors thank Santa Casa de Alfenas and the Fundação para Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais- FAPEMIG, PET MEC / SESu.

References

  1. Alves RS, Iunes DH, Pereira IC, et al. Influence of exergaming on the perception of cancer-related fatigue. Games Health J. 2017;6:119–26. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2016.0051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouissou P, Estrade PY, Goubel F, Guezennec CY, Serrurier B. Surface EMG power spectrum and intramuscular pH in human vastus lateralis muscle during dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md. 1989;67:1245–9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.3.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruusgaard JC, Egner IM, Larsen TK, et al. No change in myonuclear number during muscle unloading and reloading. J Appl Physiol. 1985;113:290–6. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00436.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruusgaard JC, Gundersen K. In vivo time-lapse microscopy reveals no loss of murine myonuclei during weeks of muscle atrophy. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1450–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI34022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruusgaard JC, Johansen IB, Egner IM, Rana ZA, Gundersen K. Myonuclei acquired by overload exercise precede hypertrophy and are not lost on detraining. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15111–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913935107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang Y-J, Han W-Y, Tsai Y-C. A Kinect-based upper limb rehabilitation system to assist people with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:3654–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chirico A, Lucidi F, De Laurentiis M, et al. Virtual reality in health system:beyond entertainment. A mini-review on the efficacy of VR during cancer treatment. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231:275–87. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Comello MLG, Francis DB, Marshall LH, et al. Cancer survivors who play recreational computer games:motivations for playing and associations with beneficial physiological outcomes. Games Health J. 2016;5:286–92. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2016.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cramp F, Byron-Daniel J. Exercise management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2012;11:CD006145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006145.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Curt GA, Breitbart W, Cella D, et al. Impact of cancer-related fatigue on the lives of patients:new findings from the Fatigue Coalition. Oncologist. 2000;5:353–60. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-5-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. De Luca C, Sabbahi M, Stulen F, Bilotto G. Some properties of the median frequency of the myoelectric signal during localized muscular fatigue. Biochemistry. 1983;13:175–86. [Google Scholar]
  12. Franc M, Michalski B, Kuczerawy I, Szuta J, Skrzypulec-Plinta V. Cancer related fatigue syndrome in neoplastic diseases. Przegla?d Menopauzalny Menopause Rev. 2014;13:352–5. doi: 10.5114/pm.2014.47989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grange RW, Houston ME. Simultaneous potentiation and fatigue in quadriceps after a 60-second maximal voluntary isometric contraction. J Appl Physiol. 1991;70:726–31. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.2.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hampson JP, Zick SM, Khabir T, Wright BD, Harris RE. Altered resting brain connectivity in persistent cancer related fatigue. NeuroImage Clin. 2015;8:305–13. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harvard Health Publishing. Fun and exergames:Not just for kids anymore. Harvard Health Letter. 2012. [Accessed, September 30th, 2015]. http://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/fun-and-exergames-not-just-for-kids-anymore .
  16. Heinonen A, Sievänen H, Viitasalo J, et al. Reproducibility of computer measurement of maximal isometric strength and electromyography in sedentary middle-aged women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1994;68:310–4. doi: 10.1007/BF00571449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang X, Zhang Q, Kang X, Song Y, Zhao W. Factors associated with cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy in an urban setting:a cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:453. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ishikawa NM, Thuler LC, Giglio AG, et al. Validation of the Portuguese version of functional assessment of cancer therapy-fatigue (FACT-F) in Brazilian cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:481–90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0697-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones JM, Olson K, Catton P, et al. Cancer-related fatigue and associated disability in post-treatment cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv Res Pract. 2015;10:51–61. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0450-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kho ME, Damluji A, Zanni JM, Needham DM. Feasibility and observed safety of interactive video games for physical rehabilitation in the intensive care unit:a case series. J Crit Care. 2012;27:219.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Komi PV, Tesch P. EMG frequency spectrum, muscle structure, and fatigue during dynamic contractions in man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1979;42:41–50. doi: 10.1007/BF00421103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuys SS, Hall K, Peasey M, et al. Gaming console exercise and cycle or treadmill exercise provide similar cardiovascular demand in adults with cystic fibrosis:a randomised cross-over trial. J Physiother. 2011;57:35–40. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leutwyler H, Hubbard EM, Dowling GA. Adherence to a videogame-based physical activity program for older adults with schizophrenia. Games Health J. 2014;3:227–33. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2014.0006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meneses-Echávez JF, González-Jiménez E, Ramírez-Vélez R. Effects of supervised multimodal exercise interventions on cancer-related fatigue:systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:328636. doi: 10.1155/2015/328636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mock V, Atkinson A, Barsevick A, et al. NCCN practice guidelines for cancer-related fatigue. Oncol (Williston Park) 2000;14:151–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peng W, Lin J-H, Crouse J. Is playing exergames really exercising? A meta-analysis of energy expenditure in active video games. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw. 2011;14:681–8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Perelle IB, Ehrman L. An international study of human handedness:The data. Behav Genet. 1994;24:217–27. doi: 10.1007/BF01067189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rubin GJ, Hardy R, Hotopf M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence and severity of postoperative fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:317–26. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00615-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, et al. American college of sports medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1409–26. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schneider SM. I look funny and I feel bad:Measurement of symptom distress. J Child Fam Nurs. 1999;2:380–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schneider SM, Prince PM, Allen MJ, et al. Virtual reality as a distraction intervention for women receiving chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31:81–8. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.81-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schneider SM, Hood LE. Virtual Reality:A distraction intervention for chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007;34:39–46. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.39-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hufthammer KO, Vika ME. Fatigue and quality of life in women treated for various types of gynaecological cancers:a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:546–55. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. SENIAM 8. European recommendations for surface electromyography. SENIAM. 2015. [Accessed, September 28th, 2015]. http://seniam.org/
  35. Shapiro CL, Recht A. Side effects of adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1997–2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200106283442607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Smith AW, Bellizzi KM, Keegan THM, et al. Health-related quality of life of adolescent and young adult patients with cancer in the united states:the adolescent and young adult health outcomes and patient experience study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2136–45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Spence RR, Heesch KC, Brown WJ. Exercise and cancer rehabilitation:a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:185–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Stallknecht B, Vissing J, Galbo H. Lactate production and clearance in exercise. Effects of training. A mini-review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998;8:127–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1998.tb00181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stasi R, Abriani L, Beccaglia P, Terzoli E, Amadori S. Cancer-related fatigue:evolving concepts in evaluation and treatment. Cancer. 2003;98:1786–801. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tabrizi FM, Alizadeh S. Cancer related fatigue in breast cancer survivors:in correlation to demographic factors. Maedica (Buchar) 2017;12:106–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Witte PB, Werner S, ter Braak LM, et al. The supraspinatus and the deltoid –not just two arm elevators. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;33:273–83. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wolin KY, Schwartz AL, Matthews CE, Courneya KS, Schmitz KH. Implementing the exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. J Support Oncol. 2012;10:171–7. doi: 10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. World Health Organization. Global action against cancer. WHO Library. 2003. [Accessed, September 28th, 2015]. http://www.who.int/cancer/media/en/GlobalActionCancerEnglfull.pdf .
  44. Yavuzsen T, Davis MP, Ranganathan VK, et al. Cancer-related fatigue:central or peripheral? J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:587–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997;13:63–74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES