Skip to main content
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation logoLink to Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
. 2018 Nov 21;9:2151459318806442. doi: 10.1177/2151459318806442

Charlson Comorbidity Index Predicts 5-Year Survivorship of Surgically Treated Hip Fracture Patients

Lei Jiang 1,, Andrew Chia Chen Chou 1, Nivedita Nadkarni 2, Caris En Qi Ng 1, Yun San Chong 1, Tet Sen Howe 1, Joyce Suang Bee Koh 1
PMCID: PMC6249653  PMID: 30479849

Abstract

Introduction:

This study aims to assess the correlation of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) with 5-year mortality in a surgically treated hip fracture population.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis was performed on 1057 patients aged 60 years and above who underwent surgery for hip fracture with a minimum of 5-year follow-up (92.2% 5-year follow-up rate) in a tertiary hospital. Manual review of patients’ electronic hospital records was performed to record demographic data, comorbidities, and length of stay. Mortality data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic medical records and corroborated with the National Electronic Health Record.

Results:

Of the 1057 patients, 283 (26.8%) were male. The majority of patients were 80 years of age and above (42.5%), with the oldest patient operated on age 102 with a mean age of 77.8 (8.6) years. Four hundred eighteen (39.5%) patients sustained extracapsular intertrochanteric fractures. The mean follow-up duration was 8 years and 3 days with an overall survivorship of 37.2%. A multiple regression model constructed with ACCI, age, gender, and fracture pattern demonstrated satisfactory predictive ability with a concordance statistic of 0.68. Patients with a higher ACCI category (≥6) had an increased 5-year mortality rate (41.8%) with an odds ratio of 13.6 (6.7-31.8, P < .001) compared to those with an ACCI category of 3 and below (89.3%).

Discussion:

The study demonstrates that ACCI correlated with 5-year mortality after surgical treatment of hip fracture. This information is pertinent in the counseling of patients with regard to their midterm survival following hip fracture surgery and may inform policy makers of the varied midterm survival rates in patients with differing ACCI scores and educate the allocation of health-care resources.

Conclusion:

The ACCI correlates with 5-year mortality after surgical treatment of hip fracture.

Keywords: hip fracture, Charlson comorbidity index, postsurgical mortality, geriatric, trauma, osteoporosis

Introduction

Osteoporotic hip fracture is a leading health problem associated with significant mortality, estimated to range from 14% to 58% 1 year after sustaining the injury.1-3 With the proportion of older individuals rising throughout the globe driven by increased life expectancy,4 the incidence of hip fracture is expected to rise from 1.66 million in 1990 to 6.26 million by 2050.5 The burden is especially acute in developed Asian countries, and by 2050, more than 50% of all osteoporotic fractures will occur in Asia.6 Given the rising burden of osteoporotic hip fractures on the public health system, prognosticating factors not only assist clinicians and patients in making informed decisions regarding their managements but also aid in the distribution of public health resources.7

The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was first developed to evaluate a weighted series of comorbid disease to estimate the probability of death within 1 year.8 It has since been modified in 1994 to adjust for age as an additional weighted variable by Charlson et al.9 The CCI has been demonstrated to accurately predict in-hospital deaths,10 30-day mortality,11 and 1-year mortality.12 In addition, various authors have correlated CCI with other outcome measures including length of stay and readmission rates after orthopedic surgery.13 The use of CCI has also been expanded to predict long-term survival up to 5 years in patients with non-small cell lung cancer14 as well as type 2 diabetic nephropathy.15

The deleterious effects of a hip fracture persist beyond the oft-studied 1-year postfracture period. A meta-analysis by Haentjens et al demonstrated that the excess annual mortality persists over time in both men and women,16 a finding that corresponded to a similar 22-year postfracture study.17 The long-term mortality of patients with hip fracture highlights the need to consider factors such as comorbidities to optimize the long-term outcome of patients and prognosticate their survival. These findings warrant studies that evaluate mortality predictive indices to stratify patient populations. There is a paucity of literature evaluating the effect of comorbid diseases on mid- to long-term mortality in patients who underwent surgery for osteoporotic hip fractures.

The aim of this study is to assess the correlation of the age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) with 5-year mortality in a surgically treated geriatric hip fracture population in a developed Asian country and compare the time to event between patients with varying ACCIs. The authors hypothesize patients with a higher ACCI are correlated with a higher risk of 5-year mortality.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary orthopedic practice in an academic center. From January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009, 1147 patients who were aged 60 and above and underwent surgery for hip fracture were recruited for our study. Patients who had a high-energy mechanism of injury, multiple fractures of the femur, and those with pathological lesions in other areas of the femur were excluded from the study. In addition, only patients with a minimum of 5-year follow-up or were died during this period were analyzed, leaving 1057 patients available for final analysis as shown in Figure 1. The average follow-up duration was 8 years and 3 days.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Patient selection process and exclusion criteria.

Manual review of patients’ electronic hospital records was performed to obtain demographic data, comorbidities, and length of stay data. Inpatient, 30-day, 1-year, and beyond 5-year mortality data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic medical records and corroborated with the National Electronic Health Record.18 The ACCI9 was obtained directly from the medical records and the patients were classified into ACCI category 1, 2, and 3 with an ACCI of 0 to 3, 4 to 5, and 6 and above, respectively. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous data have been summarized by mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate and categorical data by frequency (%). The t test or the Mann-Whitney test as appropriate was used to evaluate differences in continuous predictors between the groups. The χ2 test and Fisher exact test as appropriate were used to evaluate associations between the primary outcome and categorical predictors of interest. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the outcome and the predictors of interest. The multiple logistic regression model included the statistically and clinically significant predictors. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to check for model adequacy.

Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to assess the differences in 5-year mortality with respect to different categorical predictors of interest. The log-rank test was used to test for difference in survival. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the relationship between 5-year survival and different predictors of interest.

Results

Of the 1057 patients, 283 (26.8%) were male. The majority of patients were 80 years of age and above (42.5%), with the oldest patient operated on age 102. Four hundred eighteen (39.5%) patients sustained extracapsular intertrochanteric fractures. The mean duration of operation was 62 (60) minutes. The most prevalent comorbid conditions were hypertension (66.1%), high cholesterol (35.8%), and diabetes mellitus (30.3%), reflected in the baseline characteristics in Table 1.

Table 1.

Preoperative Characteristics and Univariate Predictors of 5-Year Mortality.

Characteristics Overall, N = 1057 Alive, n = 593 (56.1%) Dead, n = 464 (43.9%) Odds Ratio 2.5% 97.5% P Value
Age (years) 77.8 (8.6) 75.9 (7.7) 80.2 (9.0) 1.77 1.31 2.42 <.001
Male (%) 283 (26.8) 124 (20.9) 159 (34.3) 1.97 1.50 2.60 <.001
Intertrochanteric fracture (%) 418 (39.5) 214 (36.1) 204 (44.0) 1.43 1.11 1.84 .005
Operative time (minutes) 61.7 (60.4) 63.0 (72.3) 60.0 (40.3) 1.00 1.00 1.00 .448
Diabetes (%) 320 (30.3) 187 (31.5) 133 (28.7) 0.87 0.67 1.14 .313
Hypertension (%) 699 (66.1) 398 (67.1) 301 (64.9) 0.90 0.70 1.17 .444
Hyperlipidemia (%) 378 (35.8) 218 (36.8) 160 (34.5) 0.91 0.70 1.17 .442
Ischemic heart disease (%) 206 (19.5) 111 (18.7) 95 (20.5) 1.12 0.82 1.52 .475
Previous acute myocardial infarct (%) 60 (5.7) 28 (4.7) 32 (6.9) 1.49 0.89 2.53 .132
Liver failure (%) 11 (1.0) 5 (0.8) 6 (1.3) 3.01 0.83 14.04 .111
End-stage renal failure (%) 40 (3.8) 6 (1.0) 34 (7.3) 7.74 3.46 20.62 <.001
Cancer (%) 135 (12.8) 47 (7.9) 88 (19.0) 2.72 1.87 3.99 <.001
Dementia (%) 74 (7.0) 28 (4.7) 46 (9.9) 2.22 1.37 3.65 .001
Previous cerebrovascular accident (%) 177 (16.7) 82 (13.8) 95 (20.5) 1.60 1.16 2.22 .004

Univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of 5-year mortality as listed in Table 1. Multivariate analysis revealed that age group (odds ratio [OR]: 2.33, 1.65-3.34, P < .001), male gender (OR: 2.08, 1.54-2.81, P < .001), intertrochanteric fracture pattern (OR: 1.30, 1.00-1.70, P = .05), and the comorbidities identified in Table 2 were significant predictors for 5-year mortality. Significantly, the OR of 5-year mortality was almost 10 times higher in patients with end-stage renal failure, superseding that of cancer (OR: 2.53, 1.70-3.81) and dementia (OR: 2.10, 1.27-3.51) in our population.

Table 2.

Multivariate Analysis of Univariate Predictors of 5-Year Mortality.

Factors Odds Ratio 2.5% 97.5% P Value
Age group 2.33 1.65 3.34 <.001
Male gender 2.08 1.54 2.81 <.001
Extracapsular vs intracapsular fracture 1.30 1.00 1.70 .05
End-stage renal failure 9.52 4.08 26.17 <.001
Cancer 2.53 1.70 3.81 <.001
Dementia 2.10 1.27 3.51 .001
Previous cerebrovascular accident 1.43 1.01 2.03 .04

A multiple regression model constructed with ACCI, age, gender, and fracture pattern as factors demonstrated satisfactory predictive ability with a concordance statistic of 0.68 and the respective ORs are described in Table 3. For the multiple regression analysis, we did not include age group as it is collinear with CCI. Patients with an ACCI category of 3 and below, 4 to 5, and 6 and above had a 5-year survivorship of 89.3%, 62.1%, and 41.8%, respectively. The mortality rates of patients in the varying ACCI categories at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years are also described in Table 4.

Table 3.

Multiple Regression Model Using Gender, Fracture Pattern, and ACCI as Predictors of 5-Year Mortality.

Factors Odds Ratio 2.5% 97.5% P Value
Male gender 2.08 1.54 2.81 <.001
Intertrochanteric Fracture 1.30 1.00 1.70 .05
ACCI 4-5 6.23 3.12 14.46 <.001
ACCI ≥ 6 13.57 6.72 31.84 <.001

Abbreviation: ACCI, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index.

Table 4.

30-Day, 1-Year, and 5-Year Mortality Rates for Patients in Varying ACCI Categories.

ACCI Category 30-Day Mortality (%) 1-Year Mortality (%) 5-Year Mortality (%)
All patients 3.0 14.4 43.9
ACCI ≤3 0 1.3 10.7
ACCI 4-5 1.9 10.6 37.9
ACCI ≥6 5.1 22.0 58.2

Abbreviation: ACCI, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index.

The Kaplan-Meier curves by ACCI categories in Figure 2 demonstrate differences in 5-year mortality. The log-rank test was statistically significant for testing differences in survival by all the above predictors.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients in the different age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) categories: ACCI category 1: ACCI 3 and below; ACCI category 2: ACCI 4 to 5; and ACCI category 3: ACCI 6 and above.

Discussion

The study demonstrated that the ACCI correlated with 5-year mortality after surgical treatment of hip fracture in a geriatric population. Recent studies have demonstrated that the CCI correlates with 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery in an Asian population,19 but the study has shown that the correlative abilities of the ACCI extend to 5-year mortality. This information is particularly vital in an aging population with greater access to health care as the proper identification and management of higher risk patients can reduce mortality.20 This is especially pertinent with studies demonstrating that hip fracture mortality after surgery has in fact increased in certain populations.21

The 5-year mortality rates are similar to previously published studies22 in Asian populations and reflect previous identification of hip fracture as an independent predictor of 5-year mortality in a similar population.23 The relatively high 5-year mortality rates reflect the frailty of the osteoporotic fracture population and highlight the importance of identifying hip fractures as sentinel events limiting the longevity of geriatric patients. Although there is insufficient high-quality evidence to conclude that surgery affects hip fracture mortality,24 some retrospective studies have shown that surgically treated patients had lower mortality rates,25 decreased mobility,26 and quality of life indices.27 The information derived from this study will be useful in the targeted counseling of patient and family members prior to surgery.

The ACCI was chosen as it was demonstrated as the most predictive score in a study by Neuhaus et al.10 While the updated score proposed by Quan et al28 reflected a reweighted score based on advances in disease management, this did not translate into greater predictive ability for mortality after hip fracture surgery.

Besides the ACCI, the study also revealed other factors that correlated with 5-year mortality. Males were at higher risk of mortality, a finding echoed by previous studies.29 The finding of increased 5-year mortality rates in patients with intertrochanteric versus neck of femur fractures is more controversial in existing literature, with some describing an increased mortality rate in patients with intertrochanteric fracture patterns owing to differences in intrinsic prefracture factors30 but other studies have disputed this in univariate analyses.31

Although diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol were the most prevalent comorbid conditions, their ORs did not demonstrate a correlation with 5-year mortality. The authors opine that the cumulative effect of multiple comorbidities and their complications were more important than the presence of these common individual comorbidities, thus highlighting the importance of a weighted comorbidity index in stratifying patients.

Of particular interest is the clinically significant OR of 5-year mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease detected in our study. The increased mortality post-hip fracture has been described previously,32 and even in patients with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis.33 However, the OR reported in our population exceeds those reported in other study populations, prompting future studies to determine whether this is due to greater mobility of patients with end-stage renal failure leading to hip fractures in our population or whether there is a genuine differential in post-hip fracture care in this fragile patient group leading to higher mortality rates.

Instead of using administrative data for the calculation of the CCI, the study reported CCI from manual review of patient medical records which improve the accuracy and sensitivity of the scoring,34 eliminating errors encountered during coding. In addition, the national health-care database has enabled a centralized record of mortality data, leading to a low dropout rate, largely due to the inclusion of patients from different countries. Lastly, the study has included data from multiple surgeons of varying seniority to reflect the reality of hip fracture patients admitted to a busy tertiary practice in an academic center.

The authors acknowledge several limitations of the study. As a retrospective study, the use of OR may exaggerate the estimated relative risk, especially when the mortality rates increase at the 5-year follow-up. The study also did not include patients who were treated nonsurgically, the inclusion of which would have provided a control arm to determine differences in 5-year mortality rates. Lastly, the study was not able to control for other potential confounding factors such as initial injury severity scores, premorbid quality of life indices, and caregiver arrangements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the ACCI has been shown to correlate with 5-year mortality in a surgically managed hip fracture population. Besides affecting the management of individual patients, the results may inform policy makers of the varied midterm survival rates in patients with differing ACCI scores and educate the allocation of health-care resources.

Footnotes

Authors’ Note: L.J., A.C., T.H., and J.K. contributed to study concept and design. L.J., C.N., and Y.C. did acquisition of data. Analysis and interpretation of data was done by L.J., N.N., and J.K. L.J., T.H., and J.K. drafted the manuscript. L.J., T.H., and J.K. did critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was made possible by funding support from the Singhealth Foundation Grant (grant number: SHF/HSRAg001/2015).

ORCID iD: Lei Jiang, MBBS Inline graphic http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2727-0863

References

  • 1. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1573–1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331(7529):1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bentler SE, Liu L, Obrizan M, et al. The aftermath of hip fracture: discharge placement, functional status change, and mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(10):1290–1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lutz W, Sanderson W, Scherbov S. The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature. 2008;451(7179):716–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ., 3rd Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992;2(6):285–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mithal A, Dhingra V, Lau E. The Asian Audit: epidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in Asia. Int Osteoporos Foundation. 2009:24–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Johnson DJ, Greenberg SE, Sathiyakumar V, et al. Relationship between the Charlson comorbidity index and cost of treating hip fractures: implications for bundled payment. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015;16(3):209–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Neuhaus V, King J, Hageman MG, Ring DC. Charlson comorbidity indices and in-hospital deaths in patients with hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(5):1712–1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kirkland LL, Kashiwagi DT, Burton MC, Cha S, Varkey P. The Charlson comorbidity index score as a predictor of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26(6):461–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Toson B, Harvey LA, Close JC. The ICD-10 Charlson comorbidity index predicted mortality but not resource utilization following hip fracture. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(1):44–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Voskuijl T, Hageman M, Ring D. Higher Charlson comorbidity index scores are associated with readmission after orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1638–1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Birim O, Kappetein AP, Bogers AJ. Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of long-term outcome after surgery for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(5):759–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Huang YQ, Gou R, Diao YS, et al. Charlson comorbidity index helps predict the risk of mortality for patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2014;15(1):58–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colón-Emeric CS, et al. Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(6):380–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. von Friesendorff M, Besjakov J, Akesson K. Long-term survival and fracture risk after hip fracture: a 22-year follow-up in women. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(11):1832–1841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sinha P, Sunder G, Bendale P, Mantri M, Dande A. Singapore’s NEHR, in Electronic Health Record: Standards, Coding Systems, Frameworks, and Infrastructures. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lau TW, Fang C, Leung F. Assessment of postoperative short-term and long-term mortality risk in Chinese geriatric patients for hip fracture using the Charlson comorbidity score. Hong Kong Med J. 2016;22(1):16–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. McGinn T, Conte JG, Jarrett MP, ElSayegh D. Decreasing mortality for patients undergoing hip fracture repair surgery. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(6):304–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Has mortality after a hip fracture increased? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(11):1720–1726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Vaseenon T, Luevitoonvechkij S, Wongtriratanachai P, Rojanasthien S. Long-term mortality after osteoporotic hip fracture in Chiang Mai, Thailand. J Clin Densitom. 2010;13(1):63–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Koh GC, Tai BC, Ang LW, Heng D, Yuan JM, Koh WP. All-cause and cause-specific mortality after hip fracture among Chinese women and men: the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(7):1981–1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Handoll HH, Parker MJ. Conservative versus operative treatment for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD000337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tay E. Hip fractures in the elderly: operative versus nonoperative management. Singapore Med J. 2016;57(4):178–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Moulton LS, Green NL, Sudahar T, Makwana NK, Whittaker JP. Outcome after conservatively managed intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97(4):279–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Prasad JD, Varghese AK, Jamkhandi D, Chakraborty A, Rakesh PS, Abraham VJ. Quality-of-life among elderly with untreated fracture of neck of femur: a community based study from Southern India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2013;2(3):270–273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(6):676–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kannegaard PN, van der Mark S, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B. Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture: national analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival. Age Ageing. 2010;39(2):203–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Fox KM, Magaziner J, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE, Kashner TM. Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment, and sequelae. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54(12):M635–M640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kesmezacar H, Ayhan E, Unlu MC, Seker A, Karaca S. Predictors of mortality in elderly patients with an intertrochanteric or a femoral neck fracture. J Trauma. 2010;68(1):153–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hung LW, Hwang YT, Huang GS, Liang CC, Lin J. The influence of renal dialysis and hip fracture sites on the 10-year mortality of elderly hip fracture patients: a nationwide population-based observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(37):e7618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Nitsch D, Mylne A, Roderick PJ, Smeeth L, Hubbard R, Fletcher A. Chronic kidney disease and hip fracture-related mortality in older people in the UK. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(5):1539–1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. MacLean CH, Louie R, Shekelle PG, et al. Comparison of administrative data and medical records to measure the quality of medical care provided to vulnerable older patients. Med Care. 2006;44(2):141–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES