Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;66(1):269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.09.008

Long-term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Children

Pamela D Winterberg 1, Rouba Garro 1
PMCID: PMC6251502  NIHMSID: NIHMS1509593  PMID: 30454748

Kidney transplantation in children

The most common causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in children are congenital, cystic, and hereditary diseases, which combined account for 38% of incident cases.1 The most common disorders in this category are congenital obstructive uropathies (9.5%) and renal hypoplasia/dysplasia (10%). Primary glomerular disease is the second-most common etiology accounting for 25% of new cases, predominantly due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Secondary glomerulonephritis and vasculitis account for 12% of new cases, of which lupus nephritis is the most common. The underlying etiology of ESRD also varies by age of presentation (Figure 1A). As expected, congenital/hereditary/cystic disorders are the most common underlying cause of ESRD amongst the youngest age groups, while primary and secondary glomerular diseases are the leading cause among adolescents.1

Figure 1. Epidemiology of pediatric kidney transplantation in the U.S.

Figure 1.

(A) Causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis or kidney transplant for children in the U.S. broken down by age group. C/H/C, congenital/hereditary/cystic disorders; GN, glomerulonephritis; CAKUT, Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) 2017 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases. (B) Recipients of living donor kidney transplant have superior graft survival compared to recipients of deceased donor transplant. Kidney graft survival at 3, 5, and 10 years is plotted by donor source and year transplanted. LD, Living Donor; DD, Deceased Donor. (C) Kidney graft survival by recipient age and donor source. Graft survival over 5 years is plotted for pediatric recipients <11 years and those age 11–17 years transplanted in the U.S. between 2006 and 2010.

Data (B and C) from Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant. 2017;17 Suppl 1:21–116.

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for ESRD in children and confers improved survival, skeletal growth, heath-related quality of life, and neuropsychological development compared to dialysis.1

Timing of Transplant

Transplantation is initially considered when renal replacement therapy is imminent. Due to increased risk of graft loss and mortality in very young children, most pediatric centers perform kidney transplantation once children achieve a weight above 10–15 kg, which is typically around the age of 2 years. The underlying etiology for kidney failure, the rapidity of decline in kidney function, and the age and size of the patient determine whether an individual can receive a pre-emptive kidney transplant without preceding dialysis, which may provide a graft survival advantage.2 On average, 30% of pediatric kidney transplant recipients in the U.S. receive pre-emptive transplant, and an additional 24% receive dialysis treatment for less than 1 year prior to transplant.3

Donor Source

Patients can receive kidney transplants from living or deceased donors. Historically, living-related donor transplants were more common in children than deceased-donor transplants. This was likely driven by parents’ understanding of the benefit of living donation for their child such as superior long-term graft survival (see Figure 1B) and ability to schedule the procedure.4,5 However, the rate of living donor transplants in children has been declining since 2002, with only 34% of pediatric recipients in 2015 receiving living donor kidney transplants compared to 50% in 2004.

The transplant community has consistently supported timely access to deceased-donor kidney grafts for pediatric candidates with an allocation system that has historically emphasized younger donors and shorter waiting times over human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching. As a result, the absolute number and proportion of deceased-donor kidney transplants in pediatric recipients has been steadily increasing over the past 20 years accompanied by a decrease in the absolute number of living-donor transplants.6 It is unclear at this time if the trend in fewer living donor transplants is a direct consequence of policy change or due to increasing prevalence of co-morbidities in parents that preclude them from donating (e.g. obesity and diabetes).7

Patient Survival

The success of kidney transplantation in children with ESRD now results in 10-year patient survival of 90–95%. Therefore, the long-term management of these patients is focused on maintaining quality of life and minimizing long-term side effects of immunosuppression. Optimal management of pediatric kidney transplant recipients includes preventing rejection and infection, identifying and reducing the cardiovascular and metabolic effects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy, supporting normal growth and development, and managing a smooth transition into adulthood (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Long-term outcomes of pediatric kidney transplant.

Figure 2.

Issues facing pediatric kidney transplant recipients include those pertaining directly to the health of the allograft (e.g. rejection, recurrence), immune deficiency due to medications (e.g. viral infections, malignancy), growth and development in the context of organ failure (e.g. bone disease, transition to adulthood with chronic medical condition), and cardio-metabolic co-morbidities from immunosuppression (e.g. obesity, hypertension). Optimal care of the pediatric kidney transplant recipient addresses these issues in a multi-disciplinary fashion. CKD, chronic kidney disease; CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein Barr virus; BKV, BK polyoma virus; UTI, urinary tract infection; NODAT, new-onset diabetes after transplant.

Determinants of Graft Survival

In general, the estimated half-life for transplanted kidneys in children is 12–15 years, therefore children with ESRD often require more than one kidney transplant in their lifetime. The adolescent age group (11–17 years), which accounts for >50% of the pediatric kidney transplant waiting list, has worse 5-year graft survival compared to pediatric recipients under age 11 years (Figure 1C).3 Overall, living donor transplants have improved long-term outcomes compared to deceased donor transplants with 10-year graft loss of 38% versus 52%, respectively (Figure 1B).3 Long-term graft survival is affected by a number of factors including the quality of the donated kidney (e.g. living vs deceased donor, number of HLA mismatches, delayed graft function, donor age and size), the presence of pre-existing HLA antibodies (pre-sensitization), recipient race/ethnicity, recipient age (e.g. adolescence), as well as subsequent graft injury from recurrence of primary disease (e.g. FSGS), allograft infections, and acute or chronic rejection episodes.8

Rejection

Children with kidney transplants require life-long immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection of the allograft. The most common medication regimen in the U.S. includes the combination of corticosteroid (e.g. prednisone), a calcineurin inhibitor (or CNI, most commonly tacrolimus), and an anti-metabolite such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Cyclosporine and azathioprine are less commonly used for maintenance immunosuppression. Some centers offer steroid-sparing, or CNI-sparing regimens as well.

With modern immunosuppressive therapy, rates of acute rejection episodes within the first 12-months for pediatric kidney transplant in the U.S. are reported at 11%.3 Chronic allograft rejection, however, is a leading cause of graft loss in children. Late and multiple episodes of acute rejection are associated with worse long-term allograft survival. Therefore, early identification and treatment of acute rejection are paramount to improve long-term outcomes.

The diagnosis of acute rejection is not always straightforward in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Small children who have adult-sized allografts have a large renal reserve relative to their muscle mass. Therefore, significant renal injury may occur with little to no change in the serum creatinine. Children with acute rejection can present with low-grade fever and mild hypertension, but can also be asymptomatic. Therefore, most transplant centers follow serum creatinine closely with serial laboratory testing to establish baseline kidney function in order to detect early changes graft function. Some centers also perform surveillance biopsies to detect and treat subclinical rejection.

Suspected nonadherence contributes to approximately 44% of graft losses and 23% of late acute rejection episodes reported in the literature for adolescent kidney transplant recipients.9 Pre-transplant patterns of medication and dialysis treatment adherence may predict post-transplant behavior. Social, behavioral, and psychiatric interventions should be initiated prior to transplant and maintained post-transplant for those patients with identified or anticipated issues with non-adherence.

Infection and Immunity

While modern immunosuppression regimens have reduced the rate of acute rejection, infectious complications have become more frequent.1012 In particular, pediatric transplant recipients are at risk for developing virus-related complications due to immunological naiveté at the time of transplantation and primary infection under immunosuppressive therapy.

Common Viral Illnesses

Children with kidney transplants often have more severe and prolonged illness from even common viral pathogens (e.g. RSV, influenza, adenovirus) secondary to their immunocompromised status. Therefore, pediatric transplant recipients are recommended to receive annual influenza vaccination and to remain up-to-date on all other non-live viral vaccine schedules, including those for the prevention of human papilloma virus (HPV), meningococcal, and pneumococcal diseases. Care-givers and close household contacts should also be fully immunized and there are no restrictions for these otherwise healthy contacts to receive live-attenuated vaccines.

Diarrheal illness in children with kidney transplants requires special attention, since graft injury can occur even with mild dehydration, and diarrhea often significantly alters the metabolism and absorption of immunosuppressant medications. Therefore, children with kidney transplants presenting with vomiting and/or diarrhea require prompt medical evaluation including laboratory testing to assess kidney function and drug levels, and often the administration of IV fluids. Finally, should diarrhea persist, testing for opportunistic pathogens such as Giardia, microsporidia, and cryptosporidium should be considered.

Latent Viruses

Transplant recipients are routinely monitored for the re-activation or primary infection of the latent viruses, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and BK polyoma virus (BKV) using detection of viral nucleic acid in plasma (viremia). Roughly half of children are serologically naïve to CMV or EBV at the time of transplant. The combination of a CMV or EBV-positive donor with a serologically naïve pediatric recipient represents the highest risk for infection and disease post-transplant. Early detection of viremia and intervention with antiviral medications and/or reduced immunosuppression are the cornerstones of management for these viruses post-transplant.

CMV disease can present as fever, elevated transaminases, diarrhea, and pneumonia. Morbidity and mortality from early disseminated CMV disease has dramatically improved with the use of surveillance testing and effective prophylaxis (e.g. valgancyclovir) in the highest risk recipients.

Primary EBV infection in children with kidney transplant can present similarly to healthy children (e.g. pharyngitis, fever, cervical lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, mononucleosis syndrome). However, children receiving immunosuppression are at increased risk for developing post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and lymphoma as consequences of EBV infection (see more under Malignancy below). There is no effective chemoprophlyaxis for EBV infection.

BK virus is a polyomavirus that establishes a latent infection of the uroepithelium and is typically asymptomatic in the healthy host. In the transplant recipient, uncontrolled BK virus replication leads to infection of the kidney allograft (BK nephropathy) and can result in permanent damage and graft loss. BK virus infection (e.g. viremia) can occur early (within the first month) or late (several years) following kidney transplant in children. Definitive diagnosis of BK nephropathy (BKN) is obtained only by renal biopsy and the incidence in pediatric kidney transplant recipients is estimated to be 4–5%.13,14 Prospective monitoring for BK viremia with pre-emptive lowering of immunosuppression has been suggested as an effective approach.15

Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication following kidney transplant in children, occurring in 15–33% of patients.10,16 Recurrent UTI has been associated with more rapid deterioration in graft function in children.16,17 Risk factors for febrile UTI include anatomical abnormalities, dysfunctional bladder, presence of foreign material (e.g. urinary catheter or stents), and baseline immunosuppression. Parenteral antibiotics are indicated for febrile UTI in pediatric transplant patients. Some children with recurrent UTI are treated with antibiotic prophylaxis, though the benefit of this approach needs to be weighed against the increased risk for bacterial resistance with prolonged antibiotic use.

Malignancy

Long-term use of immunosuppressive medications coupled with decades of remaining life expectancy place the pediatric transplant recipient at increased risk for the development of malignancy during their lifetime. The most common malignancy in childhood transplant recipients is viral-induced lymphoproliferative disease (or PTLD) with a cumulative incidence of 1.8% by 5 years. PTLD in children is often associated with EBV infection, and children who are immunologically naïve to EBV at the time of transplant are at highest risk of developing PTLD.3 EBV-related lymphoid hyperplasia may present as adenotonsillar hypertrophy, but can also affect the GI tract (chronic diarrhea) and kidney allograft. Central nervous system involvement is also described and can be fatal. Early recognition of PTLD via surveillance for significant EBV viremia and prompt detection of lymphadenopathy with appropriate intervention are essential. Chronic, low-grade EBV viremia in transplant recipients without development of PTLD is not uncommon, therefore serial monitoring and trending of viral load using consistent laboratory methods (e.g. whole blood versus plasma, consistent lab site) are required to detect changes in viral control when evaluating risk for PTLD.

There is limited data about long-term risk for non-lymphoproliferative malignancy in patients receiving kidney transplant during childhood. In a study of adult survivors of pediatric ESRD in The Netherlands, nearly 41% developed cancer after 30 years following transplant.18 Non-melanoma skin cancer was the most common form of malignancy and had very low mortality associated with it. Renal cell carcinoma of the native kidneys was the most common solid tumor reported during childhood following kidney transplant.19 Given the increased lifetime-risk for all cancers, pediatric transplant recipients should be counseled on avoiding additional risk factors for malignancy including excessive sun exposure (e.g. sunscreen use), alcohol consumption, and tobacco use.

Another viral-associated malignancy to consider in pediatric transplant patients is urogenital cancer associated with human papilloma virus (HPV). As such, all pediatric transplant recipients are encouraged to complete the full HPV vaccine series prior to sexual maturity.

Cardio-Metabolic Comorbidities

Children with ESRD have increased cardiovascular mortality relative to their peers accounting for nearly 40% of deaths among pediatric ESRD patients.20,21 Although kidney transplantation leads to a dramatic improvement in renal function and elimination of many traditional risk factors, cardiovascular disease still accounts for over one-third of deaths among patients who receive transplants prior to 21 years of age.

Hypertension

Hypertension is common in children post-transplant and is likely due to a combination of rapid weight-gain, medication side effects (e.g. CNI and steroids), and renal injury. An estimated 50–65% of pediatric kidney transplant recipients have hypertension at 1 year post-transplant.2224 In addition to the concerns for long-term cardiovascular risk associated with uncontrolled hypertension, retrospective analyses of pediatric kidney transplant recipients suggest that systolic hypertension independently predicts poor long-term allograft survival.24,25

Obesity

Obesity is an emerging challenge in renal transplant recipients, in parallel with the general pediatric population, leading to increased risk of surgical complications, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension post-transplant.26 Many children experience rapid weight gain following transplant, likely due to a combination of lifted dietary restrictions imposed during ESRD and appetite stimulation from corticosteroids used to prevent or treat rejection. Up to 50% of pediatric transplant recipients have been classified as obese or overweight in recent studies.27,28 Furthermore, obesity complicates hypertension management with approximately 80% of obese pediatric transplant recipients having poor control of hypertension at one year.22 Weight gain should be monitored closely following transplant to identify children early at risk for obesity, as increases in BMI in the first 6 months following transplant are likely to be persistent.29

Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia are also common in children with kidney transplant likely due to a combination of drug side effects30 (e.g. cyclosporine, mTOR inhibitors, glucocorticoids) and obesity.31,32 Therefore, semi-annual screening for hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia is suggested.33 Lifestyle modification including dietary changes and increased physical activity is typically preferred for young children with hyperlipidemia. While the use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylgultaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) is generally considered safe and effective in children over the age of 8 years, few data are available on long-term safety.34 Omega-3 fatty acids have been reported to be effective at reducing LDL levels in young kidney transplant recipients in small case series.35

Diabetes

Hyperglycemia and new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) are serious and increasingly more common metabolic complications following kidney transplantation, with a reported incidence of 3–20% in pediatric recipients.3638 NODAT is associated with increased morbidity from cardiovascular complications, increased infection risk, and inferior allograft and patient survival following kidney transplantation.37 The increased incidence of NODAT in the pediatric kidney transplant population has paralleled both the obesity epidemic in the general population and the increased use of calcinuerin inhibitors (CNIs) for post-transplant immunosuppression.39 Management should focus on prevention with close screening for early signs of glucose intolerance, tailoring of immunosuppressant regimen as appropriate, and promotion of lifestyle modifications. Pharmacologic intervention (e.g. insulin) is necessary to reduce complications of hyperglycemia and improve overall allograft and patient survival when lifestyle and medication modifications fail to achieve adequate glycemic control.

Growth and Development

Short Stature and Bone Health

Impaired linear growth in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is multifactorial and is mainly due to disturbances in the axis involving growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF-binding protein. Despite satisfactory renal function following transplant, spontaneous catch-up growth is often insufficient. Abnormalities in mineral metabolism including disturbances in serum calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and vitamin D stores, are common in children following kidney transplant and increase the risk for growth delay and osteopenia or rickets.4042

Determinants of growth following transplant include age at the time of transplant, exposure to glucocorticoids, allograft function, and administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Children under the age of 6 years have increased growth rates following transplant compared to older children.43 The degree of growth stunting prior to transplant is also predictive of final adult height.44 Therapy with rhGH is effective in improving the growth velocity and final adult height of children following kidney transplant.45,46 Finally, steroid-sparing immunosuppressive protocols have demonstrated improved linear growth for pre-pubertal children undergoing kidney transplant.47

Bladder Function

Even children with non-urological causes of ESRD often have lower urinary tract symptoms following transplant including urinary urgency, bladder pain, incomplete bladder emptying, nighttime or daytime incontinence, and urinary tract infections.48 Timed voiding and prevention or treatment of functional constipation are important in the management of incontinence and dysfunctional voiding. For those with congenital bladder outlet obstruction, intermittent catheterization is often still required to avoid graft damage and dysfunction.49 Anticholinergic therapy and intermittent catheterization should be continued following transplantation as medical management of pre-existing neurogenic bladder.

Puberty

Onset of puberty is an important milestone during adolescence. The majority of children achieve normal puberty following transplant, but many may have a delayed onset and shortened duration of pubertal growth spurt, which is predicted by delayed bone age compared to their chronological age.50,51

Psychosocial Development

Transplant recipients are exposed to additional psychosocial stress related to their chronic illness. Developmental delay, issues with body image from drug side effects, difficulty interacting with peers, prolonged school absences, fastidious schedules required for immunosuppressant medication regimens, symptoms of post-traumatic stress, and family disruption due to financial burden or role strain may all exacerbate psychosocial difficulties in the pediatric transplant recipient. Collaboration with psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers is important for the early identification and intensified treatment of high-risk individuals.

Children with emotional or psychiatric disorders often require additional mental health resources including psychiatric care before and after transplant. Acquisition of coping skills, problem solving skills, and behavior modification can improve a child’s experience with the inherent complexity of dialysis or transplantation medical care. Pharmacotherapy for depression, bipolar disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder are important adjunctive therapies. Reduced clearance with impaired renal function, clearance by dialysis, and interference with the metabolism of immunosuppressive medications should be considered when selecting psychotropic medications in children with ESRD or transplant.

Children with ESRD during infancy can have significant developmental delay due to uremia. In the absence of structural brain abnormalities, psychomotor delay often improves following transplant, with many infants regaining normal developmental milestones.52 Lower IQ and learning disabilities are most common in children born prematurely and those who had multiple hypertensive crises and/or seizures prior to transplant.53 Ongoing evaluation of neurocognitive abilities and appropriate support from school systems are needed to achieve optimal school performance following transplant.

Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood

Adolescence is an important transition period between childhood and adulthood characterized by a quest for independence and autonomy. This rapidly changing and volatile developmental period places adolescent transplant recipients at increased risk for medication non-adherence, acute rejection episodes, and graft loss. Furthermore, it may be difficult for teenagers to accept the cosmetic side effects of immunosuppressant medications such as weight gain, Cushingoid facial features, acne, and gingival hypertrophy. The accompanying psychological stress and impact on self-image for teenagers can provide a dangerous disincentive to adhere to immunosuppressant medications. Medical management of this population can be challenging and benefits from specialized, multi-disciplinary approaches to improve outcomes.

Sexuality-related issues including prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and family planning also need to be addressed with teenage transplant patients. Adolescent female transplant recipients have successfully become pregnant while receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus. The effect of contraception on the metabolism of immunosuppressant medications needs to be considered when counseling adolescent girls about pregnancy prevention. In addition, the teratogenic potential of immunosuppressant medications (notably MMF) and antihypertensive medications (e.g. ACE inhibitors) should be explained to the adolescent female and her family.

Transition to Adult Healthcare Delivery

The term, emerging adulthood, is used to define the interval of 18 to 25 years of age when young adults appear physically mature, yet brain maturation has not yet completed. This age group is at increased risk for graft failure likely due to a combination of age-related risk behavior and the processes involved in transitioning from pediatric-based to adult-based health care delivery systems.54 The identification of strategies to facilitate safe transition to adult healthcare delivery systems and improve outcomes for adolescent transplant recipients has become a priority for the pediatric transplant community.5456

Synopsis:

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in children and confers improved survival, skeletal growth, heath-related quality of life, and neuropsychological development compared to dialysis. Kidney transplantation in children with ESRD results in 10-year patient survival exceeding 90%. Therefore, the long-term management of these patients is focused on maintaining quality of life and minimizing long-term side effects of immunosuppression. Optimal management of pediatric kidney transplant recipients includes preventing rejection and infection, identifying and reducing the cardiovascular and metabolic effects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy, supporting normal growth and development, and managing a smooth transition into adulthood.

Key Points:

  • Patient survival is excellent following kidney transplantation in children (90–95% at 10-years)

  • Long-term kidney transplant outcomes are dependent on excellent adherence to follow-up and immunosuppressive regimens

  • Adolescent and young adult recipients have the highest risk for graft loss at 5-years

  • Life-long immunosuppression increases the risk for infections and malignancies in children with kidney transplant

  • Weight gain and immunosuppressive medications increase the risk for cardio-metabolic complications (hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes)

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosure Statement: The authors have no financial interests or conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.USRDS. United States Renal Data System. 2017 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institure of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases;2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lofaro D, Jager KJ, Abu-Hanna A, et al. Identification of subgroups by risk of graft failure after paediatric renal transplantation: application of survival tree models on the ESPN/ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016;31(2):317–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Kidney. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons 2017;17 Suppl 1:21–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Van Arendonk KJ, Chow EK, James NT, et al. Choosing the order of deceased donor and living donor kidney transplantation in pediatric recipients: a Markov decision process model. Transplantation 2015;99(2):360–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Van Arendonk KJ, James NT, Orandi BJ, et al. Order of donor type in pediatric kidney transplant recipients requiring retransplantation. Transplantation 2013;96(5):487–493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Agarwal S, Oak N, Siddique J, Harland RC, Abbo ED. Changes in pediatric renal transplantation after implementation of the revised deceased donor kidney allocation policy. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons 2009;9(5):1237–1242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Keith DS, Vranic G, Barcia J, Norwood V, Nishio-Lucar A. Longitudinal analysis of living donor kidney transplant rates in pediatric candidates in the United States. Pediatric transplantation 2017;21(2). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hwang AH, Cho YW, Cicciarelli J, Mentser M, Iwaki Y, Hardy BE. Risk factors for short-and long-term survival of primary cadaveric renal allografts in pediatric recipients: a UNOS analysis. Transplantation 2005;80(4):466–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dobbels F, Ruppar T, De Geest S, Decorte A, Van Damme-Lombaerts R, Fine RN. Adherence to the immunosuppressive regimen in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. Pediatric transplantation 2010;14(5):603–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hogan J, Pietrement C, Sellier-Leclerc AL, et al. Infection-related hospitalizations after kidney transplantation in children: incidence, risk factors, and cost. Pediatr Nephrol 2017;32(12):2331–2341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kizilbash SJ, Rheault MN, Bangdiwala A, Matas A, Chinnakotla S, Chavers BM. Infection rates in tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-treated pediatric kidney transplant recipients on a rapid discontinuation of prednisone protocol: 1-year analysis. Pediatric transplantation 2017;21(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ettenger R, Chin H, Kesler K, et al. Relationship Among Viremia/Viral Infection, Alloimmunity, and Nutritional Parameters in the First Year After Pediatric Kidney Transplantation. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons 2017;17(6):1549–1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Smith JM, Dharnidharka VR, Talley L, Martz K, McDonald RA. BK virus nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients: an analysis of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) registry. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;2(5):1037–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Momynaliev KT, Gorbatenko EV, Shevtsov AB, Gribanov OG, Babenko NN, Kaabak MM. Prevalence and subtypes of BK virus in pediatric renal transplant recipients in Russia. Pediatric transplantation 2012;16(2):151–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smith JM, Dharnidharka VR. Viral surveillance and subclinical viral infection in pediatric kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30(5):741–748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Weigel F, Lemke A, Tonshoff B, et al. Febrile urinary tract infection after pediatric kidney transplantation: a multicenter, prospective observational study. Pediatr Nephrol 2016;31(6):1021–1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Herthelius M, Oborn H. Urinary tract infections and bladder dysfunction after renal transplantation in children. The Journal of urology 2007;177(5):1883–1886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ploos van Amstel S, Vogelzang JL, Starink MV, Jager KJ, Groothoff JW. Long-Term Risk of Cancer in Survivors of Pediatric ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;10(12):2198–2204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smith JM, Martz K, McDonald RA, Harmon WE. Solid tumors following kidney transplantation in children. Pediatric transplantation 2013;17(8):726–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Parekh RS, Carroll CE, Wolfe RA, Port FK. Cardiovascular mortality in children and young adults with end-stage kidney disease. The Journal of pediatrics 2002;141(2):191–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McDonald SP, Craig JC, Australian, New Zealand Paediatric Nephrology A. Long-term survival of children with end-stage renal disease. The New England journal of medicine 2004;350(26):2654–2662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hooper DK, Williams JC, Carle AC, et al. The quality of cardiovascular disease care for adolescents with kidney disease: a Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium study. Pediatr Nephrol 2013;28(6):939–949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dobrowolski LC, van Huis M, van der Lee JH, et al. Epidemiology and management of hypertension in paediatric and young adult kidney transplant recipients in The Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016;31(11):1947–1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suszynski TM, Rizzari MD, Gillingham KJ, et al. Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy and long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2013;27(3):472–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mitsnefes MM, Khoury PR, McEnery PT. Early posttransplantation hypertension and poor long-term renal allograft survival in pediatric patients. The Journal of pediatrics 2003;143(1):98–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Terrace JD, Oniscu GC. Paediatric obesity and renal transplantation: current challenges and solutions. Pediatr Nephrol 2016;31(4):555–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Friedman AN, Miskulin DC, Rosenberg IH, Levey AS. Demographics and trends in overweight and obesity in patients at time of kidney transplantation. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation 2003;41(2):480–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Boschetti SB, Nogueira PC, Pereira AM, Fisberg M, Pestana JO. Prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of overweight in children and adolescents who underwent renal transplantation--short- and medium-term analysis. Pediatric transplantation 2013;17(1):41–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Foster BJ, Martz K, Gowrishankar M, Stablein D, Al-Uzri A. Weight and height changes and factors associated with greater weight and height gains after pediatric renal transplantation: a NAPRTCS study. Transplantation 2010;89(9):1103–1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Habbig S, Volland R, Krupka K, et al. Dyslipidemia after pediatric renal transplantation-The impact of immunosuppressive regimens. Pediatric transplantation 2017;21(3). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wilson AC, Greenbaum LA, Barletta GM, et al. High prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and associated left ventricular hypertrophy in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatric transplantation 2010;14(1):52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen J, Liverman R, Garro R, Jernigan S, Travers C, Winterberg P. A Single Center Retrospective Review of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Outcomes According to Banff Grade and Cellular Rejection Treatment. Poster presented at American Transplant Congress; 5/2/17, 2017; Chicago, IL. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hooper DK, Kirby CL, Margolis PA, Goebel J. Reliable individualized monitoring improves cholesterol control in kidney transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2013;131(4):e1271–1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Braamskamp MJ, Wijburg FA, Wiegman A. Drug therapy of hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents. Drugs 2012;72(6):759–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Filler G, Weiglein G, Gharib MT, Casier S. Omega3 fatty acids may reduce hyperlipidemia in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatric transplantation 2012;16(8):835–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mehrnia A, Le TX, Tamer TR, Bunnapradist S. Effects of acute rejection vs new-onset diabetes after transplant on transplant outcomes in pediatric kidney recipients: analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database. Pediatric transplantation 2016;20(7):952–957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Koshy SM, Guttmann A, Hebert D, Parkes RK, Logan AG. Incidence and risk factors for cardiovascular events and death in pediatric renal transplant patients: a single center long-term outcome study. Pediatric transplantation 2009;13(8):1027–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prokai A, Fekete A, Kis E, et al. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus in children following renal transplantation. Pediatric transplantation 2008;12(6):643–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Garro R, Warshaw B, Felner E. New-onset diabetes after kidney transplant in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30(3):405–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shroff R, Knott C, Gullett A, Wells D, Marks SD, Rees L. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with short stature and may influence blood pressure control in paediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 2011;26(12):2227–2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bonthuis M, Busutti M, van Stralen KJ, et al. Mineral metabolism in European children living with a renal transplant: a European society for paediatric nephrology/european renal association-European dialysis and transplant association registry study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;10(5):767–775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ebbert K, Chow J, Krempien J, Matsuda-Abedini M, Dionne J. Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatric transplantation 2015;19(5):492–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Franke D, Thomas L, Steffens R, et al. Patterns of growth after kidney transplantation among children with ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;10(1):127–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Englund MS, Tyden G, Wikstad I, Berg UB. Growth impairment at renal transplantation--a determinant of growth and final height. Pediatric transplantation 2003;7(3):192–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gil S, Vaiani E, Guercio G, et al. Effectiveness of rhGH treatment on final height of renal-transplant recipients in childhood. Pediatr Nephrol 2012;27(6):1005–1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Berard E, Andre JL, Guest G, et al. Long-term results of rhGH treatment in children with renal failure: experience of the French Society of Pediatric Nephrology. Pediatr Nephrol 2008;23(11):2031–2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tsampalieros A, Knoll GA, Molnar AO, Fergusson N, Fergusson DA. Corticosteroid Use and Growth After Pediatric Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transplantation 2017;101(4):694–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Van der Weide MJ, Cornelissen EA, Van Achterberg T, de Gier RP, Feitz WF. Lower urinary tract symptoms after renal transplantation in children. The Journal of urology 2006;175(1):297–302; discussion 302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Luke PP, Herz DB, Bellinger MF, et al. Long-term results of pediatric renal transplantation into a dysfunctional lower urinary tract. Transplantation 2003;76(11):1578–1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tainio J, Qvist E, Vehmas R, et al. Pubertal development is normal in adolescents after renal transplantation in childhood. Transplantation 2011;92(4):404–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ghanem ME, Emam ME, Albaghdady LA, et al. Effect of childhood kidney transplantation on puberty. Fertility and sterility 2010;94(6):2248–2252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mendley SR, Zelko FA. Improvement in specific aspects of neurocognitive performance in children after renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1999;56(1):318–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Qvist E, Pihko H, Fagerudd P, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in high-risk patients after renal transplantation in early childhood. Pediatric transplantation 2002;6(1):53–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Foster BJ. Heightened graft failure risk during emerging adulthood and transition to adult care. Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30(4):567–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Harden PN, Walsh G, Bandler N, et al. Bridging the gap: an integrated paediatric to adult clinical service for young adults with kidney failure. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2012;344:e3718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kreuzer M, Prufe J, Oldhafer M, et al. Transitional Care and Adherence of Adolescents and Young Adults After Kidney Transplantation in Germany and Austria: A Binational Observatory Census Within the TRANSNephro Trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(48):e2196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES