Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B logoLink to Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B
. 2018 Jun 1;8(6):969–980. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.05.009

Accurate authentication of Dendrobium officinale and its closely related species by comparative analysis of complete plastomes

Shuying Zhu a,b,†, Zhitao Niu a,†, Qingyun Xue a, Hui Wang a, Xuezhu Xie a, Xiaoyu Ding a,⁎
PMCID: PMC6251949  PMID: 30505665

Abstract

Owing to its great medicinal and ornamental values, Dendrobium officinale is frequently adulterated with other Dendrobium species on the market. Unfortunately, the utilization of the common DNA markers ITS, ITS2, and matK+rbcL is unable to distinguish D. officinale from 5 closely related species of it (D. tosaense, D. shixingense, D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum and D. aduncum). Here, we compared 63 Dendrobium plastomes comprising 40 newly sequenced plastomes of the 6 species and 23 previously published plastomes. The plastomes of D. officinale and its closely related species were shown to have conserved genome structure and gene content. Comparative analyses revealed that small single copy region contained higher variation than large single copy and inverted repeat regions, which was mainly attributed to the loss/retention of ndh genes. Furthermore, the intraspecific sequence variability among different Dendrobium species was shown to be diversified, which necessitates a cautious evaluation of genetic markers specific for different Dendrobium species. By evaluating the maximum likelihood trees inferred from different datasets, we found that the complete plastome sequence dataset had the highest discriminatory power for D. officinale and its closely related species, indicating that complete plastome sequences can be used to accurately authenticate Dendrobium species.

Abbreviations: BS, bootstrap value; CE, capillary electrophoresis; HPLC, high-pressure liquid chromatography; Indels, insertions/deletions; IR, inverted repeat region; LSC, large single copy region; ML, maximum likelihood; NGS, next-generation sequencing; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; SSC, small single copy region; SV, sequence variability.

KEY WORDS: Authentication, Complete plastome sequence, Dendrobium officinale, Plastomic comparison, Genetic marker

Graphical abstract

In this study, the authors compared 63 Dendrobium plastomes comprising 40 newly sequenced plastomes of this group and 23 previously published plastomes. By evaluating the maximum likelihood (ML) trees inferred from different sequence datasets, we found that D. officinale and its closely related species could be accurately authenticated by using the complete plastome sequences.

fx1

Open in a new tab

1. Introduction

The genus Dendrobium, one of the largest genera in the family Orchidaceae, comprises approximately 1200–1500 species, mainly distributed in tropical and subtropical Asia and eastern Australia1, 2. There are about 80 species of this genus in China. Dendrobium orchids are one of the most well known orchids in global horticultural trade due to their beautiful flowers and ideal characteristics as houseplants3. Moreover, many species in this genus have been extensively used as traditional herbal medicine in many Asian countries for hundreds of years4. Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo is a rare and endangered species endemic to China, mainly distributed in southern provinces such as Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Fujian and Zhejiang5, 6. However, because of its high medicinal and ornamental values, D. officinale has often been adulterated with other Dendrobium species on the market7, 8.

Dendrobium species are notoriously difficult to identify due to their similar appearance and tissue structure9, 10, 11. Usually, their identification relies heavily on morphological methods as well as phytochemical approaches such as capillary electrophoresis (CE)12 and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC)13. Unfortunately, these methods are unable to distinguish D. officinale from several Dendrobium species, especially 5 closely related species of it (D. tosaense Makino; D. shixingense Z. L. Chen, S. J. Zeng et J. Duan; D. flexicaule Z. H. Tsi, S. C. Sun et L. G. Xu; D. scoriarum W. W. Smith; D. aduncum Lindl.)14, 15 because of their close affinities.

Recently, molecular techniques have been used in the authentication studies of Dendrobium, and a great number of molecular markers have been developed to identify D. officinale and its closely related species3, 16, 17, 18. Moreover, a single or a combination of DNA barcodes has also been adopted to infer their species relationships14, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23. However, the identification of D. officinale and its close relatives remains difficult because of the high similarities in their genetic backgrounds. For instance, by using 5 DNA markers (ITS, rbcL, matK, psbA-trnH and trnL intron) to construct the relationships among 109 Dendrobium species, the relationships among most of these Dendrobium species were clearly settled, yet D. officinale and its closely related species were still nested with each other14. Xu et al.23 employed the sequence combination of ITS+matK to identify Dendrobium species, which showed high specificity for most of the species, but failed to distinguish D. officinale and its closely related species. Therefore, it is desirable to develop an effective method for authenticating D. officinale and its closely related species.

Chloroplasts, the photosynthetic plastids, are usually uniparentally inherited and have their own genomes called plastomes. In general, plastomes of seed plants have relatively small sizes, conserved gene contents, and dense coding regions as compared with nuclear and mitochondrial genomes24. With these unique features, plastomes can be easily assembled and compared25. With the advance of next-generation sequencing (NGS), the number of complete plastome sequences has increased rapidly, which provided the opportunity to identify species using the complete plastome sequences. For example, Nock et al.26 employed complete plastome sequences for the species identification studies of grasses. Using the similar approach, Hu et al.27 established a phylogeny for the species of Orychophragmus and discriminated 6 close relatives in this genus, and Zhang et al.28 successfully distinguished 9 species of Echinacea. The positive results in these studies implied that the complete plastome sequences had the potential ability to clarify the relationships of D. officinale and its closely related species. In addition, the mutational hotspots among Dendrobium species were assessed by Niu et al.29, with 10 loci being put forth as mutational hotspots for Dendrobium plastomes. However, it remains to be determined whether these loci are still maintaining the highest degree of sequence variability within species.

In this study, 63 Dendrobium plastomes were compared, comprising 40 newly sequenced plastomes of D. officinale and its closely related species as well as 23 previously published plastomes. Our aims were: (1) to characterize the plastomes of D. officinale and 5 close relatives of it regarding genome structure, gene content, and sequence divergence; (2) to detect the intraspecific plastomic mutational hotspots that are useful for population studies and conservation genetic research; (3) to assess the species discriminatory power of the complete plastome sequences for D. officinale and its closely related species. Based on the comparison of different sequence datasets, our results showed that complete plastome sequences could be used for the authentication study of D. officinale and its closely related species.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant materials and DNA extraction

A total of 40 representative individuals were collected from the main distribution areas of D. officinale and 5 closely related species of it: D. tosaense, D. shixingense, D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum (D. guangxiense), and D. aduncum (Table 130, 31). All the plant samples were identified by Prof. Xiaoyu Ding and grown in a greenhouse at Nanjing Normal University, China. Total genomic DNA of each sample was extracted from 2 g fresh leaves using Dneasy Plant Mini Kits (QIAGEN, Germany). DNA samples that met the quality requirements (A260/280 ratio=1.8–2.0, A260/230 ratio >1.7, and DNA concentration >100 ng/µL) were used for sequencing.

Table 1.

Sampling information and plastome characteristics of D. officinale and its closely related species.

No. Species Code Location Plastome length (bp) LSC length (bp) SSC length (bp) IR length (bp) AT content (%) Voucher Accession No.
1 D. officinale DoWS Wenshan, Yunnan Province 152156 85016 14522 26309 62.52 ZSY01005 LC331062
2 D. officinale DoGN Guangnan, Yunnan Province 152018 84910 14514 26297 62.50 ZSY01011 LC348520
3 D. officinale DoSP Shiping, Yunnan Province 152246 85106 14510 26315 62.54 ZSY01017 LC348521
4 D. officinale DoXY Xingyi, Guizhou Province 152165 85025 14522 26309 62.56 ZSY01213 LC348522
5 D. officinale DoSD Sandu, Guizhou Province 152029 84919 14516 26297 62.46 ZSY01808 LC348523
6 D. officinale DoTE Tian׳e, Guangxi Province 152042 84920 14522 26300 62.51 ZSY01710 LC348524
7 D. officinale DoGL Guilin, Guangxi Province 152167 85040 14509 26309 62.52 ZSY01709 LC348525
8 D. officinale DoSG Shaoguan, Guangdong Province 152224 85094 14514 26308 62.53 ZSY01622 LC348526
9 D. officinale DoHS Huoshan, Anhui Province 152163 85033 14514 26308 62.52 ZSY01521 LC348527
10 D. officinale DoSY Shaoyang, Hunan Province 152023 84931 14476 26308 62.51 ZSY01423 LC348528
11 D. officinale DoLN Longnan, Jiangxi Province 152226 85096 14514 26308 62.53 ZSY01314 LC348529
12 D. officinale DoJG Jinggangshan, Jiangxi Province 152066 84936 14514 26308 62.51 ZSY01315 LC348530
13 D. officinale DoLC Liancheng, Fujian Province 152163 85031 14514 26309 62.52 ZSY01807 LC348725
14 D. officinale DoLS Lishui, Zhejiang Province 152219 85104 14515 26300 62.61 ZSY01918 LC348531
15 D. officinale DoYD Yandang, Zhejiang Province 152221 85109 14516 26298 62.53 Luo et al.30
16 D. officinale DoZJ Zhejiang Province 152018 84944 14506 26284 62.43 Yang et al.31
17 D. tosaense DtTD Taidong, Taiwan 152253 85094 14507 26321 62.63 ZSY03221 LC348532
18 D. tosaense DtHL Hualian, Taiwan 152250 85091 14517 26321 62.53 ZSY03226 LC348720
19 D. tosaense DtLN Longnan, Jiangxi Province 152256 85099 14508 26320 62.53 ZSY03325 LC348721
20 D. shixingense DsDA Du’an, Guangxi Province 152123 85063 14502 26279 62.50 ZSY09212 LC348726
21 D. shixingense DsGL Guilin, Guangxi Province 152195 85076 14501 26309 62.56 ZSY09331 LC348722
22 D. shixingense DsLZ Liuzhou, Guangxi Province 152175 85056 14501 26309 62.52 ZSY09330 LC348723
23 D. shixingense DsCZ Chenzhou, Hunan Province 152183 85062 14503 26309 62.50 ZSY09688 LC348724
24 D. shixingense DsNX Nanxiong, Guangdong Province 152184 85063 14503 26309 62.52 ZSY09008 LC348861
25 D. shixingense DsSX Shixing, Guangdong Province 152178 85057 14503 26309 62.52 ZSY09001 LC348860
26 D. shixingense DsLN Longnan, Jiangxi Province 152178 85058 14502 26309 62.52 ZSY09335 LC348863
27 D. shixingense DsQN Quannan, Jiangxi Province 152181 85061 14502 26309 62.52 ZSY09213 LC348862
28 D. flexicaule DfGZ Ganzi, Sichuan Province 152191 85030 14483 26339 62.55 ZSY05441 LC348965
29 D. flexicaule DfGL Ganluo, Sichuan Province 152245 85045 14492 26354 62.56 ZSY05225 LC348856
30 D. flexicaule DfSN Shennongjia, Hubei Province 152252 85049 14495 26354 62.54 ZSY05002 LC348854
31 D. flexicaule DfNZ Nanzhao, Henan Province 152242 85039 14495 26354 62.53 ZSY05008 LC348855
32 D. scoriarum DgDB Debao, Guangxi Province 151982 84929 14449 26302 62.52 ZSY02011 LC348847
33 D. scoriarum DgHC Hechi, Guangxi Province 151992 84933 14455 26302 62.52 ZSY02022 LC348848
34 D. scoriarum DgXL Xilin, Guangxi Province 151998 84941 14455 26301 62.53 ZSY02035 LC348849
35 D. scoriarum DgFN Funing, Yunnan Province 151995 84936 14455 26302 62.52 ZSY02215 LC348852
36 D. scoriarum DgWS Wenshan, Yunnan Province 151994 84938 14454 26301 62.53 ZSY02205 LC348851
37 D. scoriarum DgXC Xichou, Yunnan Province 151978 84921 14455 26301 62.52 ZSY02238 LC348853
38 D. scoriarum DgXY Xingyi, Guizhou Province 151990 84934 14442 26307 62.42 ZSY02106 LC348864
39 D. scoriarum DgAL Anlong, Guizhou Province 151985 84951 14450 26292 62.53 ZSY02118 LC348850
40 D. aduncum DaLF Luofushan, Guangdong Province 152112 84952 14522 26319 62.52 ZSY06111 LC348858
41 D. aduncum DaTY Taoyuan, Hunan Province 152104 84944 14522 26319 62.46 ZSY06116 LC348859
42 D. aduncum DaXY Xingyi, Guizhou Province 152123 84961 14524 26319 62.48 ZSY06088 LC348857
Open in a new tab

2.2. DNA sequencing, plastome assembly, annotation, and PCR-based validation

Paired-end sequencing of 150 bp was conducted on an Illumina Hiseq. 4000 platform, and >6 Gb of sequence data for each sample was obtained. The raw reads were trimmed with an error probability <0.05 and by removing one nucleotide at both terminal ends, and then assembled on CLC Genomics Workbench 8.5.1 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark) by using the de novo assembling method coupled with reference-guided assembling method as described by Niu et al32. The plastome of D. officinale NC_02401930 was used as reference. The gaps and 4 junctions between inverted repeat (IR) regions and single copy (SC) regions were confirmed by PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing with specific primers.

The complete plastome sequences were annotated by using the online program DOGMA33. The tRNA genes were detected with tRNAscan-SE 1.234. The exact boundaries of each gene were manually checked by comparing them with homologous genes of other plastomes in the genus of Dendrobium.

2.3. The analysis of plastomic sequence divergence of D. officinale and its closely related species

In addition to 40 plastomes newly sequenced in this study, two published plastomes of D. officinale with the GenBank accession numbers NC_02401930 and KJ86288631 were also retrieved for comparative analyses. Full alignments of 42 these plastomes were performed using mVISTA program35, with D. officinale (NC_024019) used as the reference. To estimate the sequence divergence of different regions of the plastomes, sequences of coding regions and non-coding regions (introns, intergenic spacer regions, and pseudogenes) were retrieved from these 42 plastomes. The syntenic loci were aligned using MUSCLE 3.8.3136 implemented in MEGA 5.237. The sequences of non-coding regions were firstly aligned with the default parameters and then realigned with the “Refining” option. The sequences of protein-coding genes were aligned with the Align Codons option using the default parameters. The gaps located at the 5′- and 3′-ends of alignments were excluded. Then, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions/deletions (Indels) were identified by DnaSP v538.

2.4. Estimates of sequence variability

The intraspecific-level sequence variability (SV) for each intergenic and intronic locus with the length of more than 150 bp was estimated according to the formula described by Niu et al.39 as follows: SV (%)=(The number of SNPs+the number of Indel events) / (The number of conserved sites+the number of SNPs+the number of Indel events)×100. For each locus, there were 120, 3, 28, 12, 28, and 3 pairwise alignments for D. officinale, D. tosaense, D. shixingense, D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum, and D. aduncum, respectively. Finally, we determined the average SV of each syntenic locus for each species.

2.5. Species authentication analyses

To determine whether the complete plastome sequences or commonly used DNA markers have higher discriminatory power for D. officinale and its closely related species, a total of 10 DNA regions (ITS, ITS2, matK, rbcL, psbA-trnH, trnT-trnL, rpl32-trnL, clpP-psbB, trnL intron, and rps16-trnQ) and the complete plastome sequences of 72 samples were employed for the authentication studies (Supplementary Information Table S1). The sequences of DNA markers were aligned with MEGA 5.237. The complete plastome sequences were aligned with MAFFT v7.22140 and then adjusted manually in MEGA 5.237. All of the gaps and ambiguous sites were removed. Subsequently, these sequences were categorized into 9 datasets: (1) ITS, (2) ITS2, (3) ITS+matK, (4) ITS+psbA-trnH, (5) ITS2+rbcL, (6) matK+rbcL, (7) ITS+matK+rbcL, (8) trnT-trnL+rpl32-trnL+clpP-psbB+trnL intron+rps16-trnQ, and (9) the complete plastome sequences. Maximum likelihood (ML) trees for the 9 datasets were reconstructed using RAxML 8.0.241 with the GTRGAMMA model. A thousand bootstrap replicates were executed to estimate the robustness of the ML trees. Moreover, given that different regions of plastomes vary in molecular evolutionary rates42, we also reconstructed ML trees using the following datasets: (1) the large single copy (LSC) regions, (2) the small single copy (SSC) regions, (3) the IRs, (4) protein-coding genes, and (5) non-coding regions.

2.6. Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS Statistics 22.0.

3. Results

3.1. Plastome features

A total of 40 complete plastomes from D. officinale and 5 closely related species of it were sequenced, which came from 14, 3, 8, 4, 8, and 3 individual plants of D. officinale, D. tosaense, D.shixingense, D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum, and D. aduncum, respectively (Table 130, 31). Additionally, two published plastomes of D. officinale (NC_02401930 and KJ86288631) were also included in comparative analyses. The plastome length of D. officinale ranged from 152,018 to 152,246 bp. All of the 16 plastomes displayed the typical quadripartite structure comprising a pair of IRs (26,284–26,315 bp) separated by the LSC (84,910–85,109 bp) and SSC (14,476–14,522 bp) regions. The overall AT content ranged from 62.43% to 62.61%. Each of these plastomes contained 103 unique genes (Fig. 1) consisting of 69 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA genes. Nine pseudogenes were detected, comprising 7 ndh remnants (ψndhA, D, E, F, G, H and J) and 2 incompletely duplicated genes at the IR/SC boundaries (ψrpl22 and ψycf1). The coding regions occupied 53.88–53.97% of the complete plastome. Non-coding regions that were composed of pseudogenes, introns, and intergenic spacers occupied 3.33–3.36%, 11.70–11.74%, and 30.95–31.04% of the plastome sequences, respectively. On the other hand, the plastomes of other 5 species had the lengths of 151,978–152,256 bp, and also possessed highly conserved structure, gene content and order.

Figure 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Plastome map of D. officinale and its closely related species. The genes outside and inside the circle are transcribed clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively. The length of the plastomes among the six species ranges from 151,978 to 152,256 bp.

The sequences flanking IR/SC junctions were compared between D. officinale and its closely related species (Fig. 2). The boundaries of IR/LSC rarely changed among the 6 species. The junctions of IRa/SSC were located in the 5′ end of ycf1, which resulted in a duplicated ψycf1 in the IRb regions. The length of ψycf1 was 309 bp consistently in D. officinale, D. tosaense, and D. shixingense, while varing slightly among D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum, and D. aduncum (being 342, 326, and 318 bp, respectively). The IRb/SSC junctions of D. officinale, D. tosaense, and D. shixingense were located upstream of ψndhF by 3 bp; whereas the junctions of D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum, and D. aduncum were expanded into 3′ end of ψndhF, resulting in an overlap of ψycf1 and ψndhF by approximately 10 bp. These results revealed that the expansion/contraction of IRs was conversed among D. officinale and its closely related species.

Figure 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Comparison of the regions flanking IR/SC junctions among D. officinale and its closely related species. The plastome of Phalaenopsis equestris is used as the reference.

3.2. Plastomic sequence divergence

The sequence divergence of 42 plastomes of D. officinale and its closely related species were estimated. As expected, the non-coding regions exhibited higher divergence levels than the coding regions (Fig. 3). Based on the plastome-wide investigation, totally 1168 SNPs and 452 Indels were detected among these plastomes (Table 2 and Supplementary information Table S2), with the average densities of 7.6 SNPs per kb and 3.0 Indels per kb across the complete plastome. Most of the variants (585 SNPs and 355 Indels) were located in intergenic spacers. In addition, the SNP and Indel distribution were also compared among the LSC, SSC, and IR regions. The remarkably higher SNP and Indel densities in SSC region indicated that the variation of SSC was higher than that of LSC and IR regions. The drastic variation of SSC region might be related to the independent loss/retention of ndh genes. Therefore, in order to determine the effects of the loss/retention of ndh genes on the variation of SSC, we divided the SSC sequences into 3 parts: ndh pseudogenes, intergenic spacer regions adjacent to ndh pseudogenes, and the other regions (Table 3). Our comparison results showed a higher density and number of SNPs and Indels in ndh pseudogenes and their adjacent intergnic spacer regions, suggesting that the loss/retention of ndh genes played an important role in causing the high variation of SSC.

Figure 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Sequence identity plots among the plastomes of D. officinale and its closely related species with D. officinale (NC_024019) sequence as the reference by using mVISTA. Each species is represented by one accession.

Table 2.

The SNPs and Indels in 42 complete plastomes of D. officinale and its closely related species.

Region Coding region
 Intergenic spacer
 Intron
 Pseudogene
 Summary
SNP Indel SNP Indel SNP Indel SNP Indel SNP Indel
LSC 174 (4.0) 3 (0.07) 425 (13.6) 280 (9.0) 112 (10.6) 42 (4.0) 7 (15.9) 2 (4.6) 718 (8.4) 327 (3.8)
SSC 105 (15.1) 6 (0.9) 104 (31.7) 33 (10.1) – – 91 (20.9) 24 (5.6) 300 (20.6) 63 (4.3)
IRs 66 (2.1) 10 (0.3) 56 (4.2) 42 (3.1) 26 (3.5) 10 (1.4) 2 (5.8) 0 150 (2.8) 62 (1.2)
Total 345 (4.2) 19 (0.2) 585 (12.2) 355 (7.4) 138 (7.7) 52 (2.9) 100 (19.5) 26 (5.1) 1168 (7.6) 452 (3.0)
Open in a new tab

The figures in the bracket indicate the density (per kb) of SNPs or Indels in a target region.

Table 3.

The SNPs and Indels in SSC regions of D. officinale and its closely related species.

Region SNP Indel
Ndh pseudogene 91 (21.1) 24 (5.6)
Adjacent regions of ndh pseudogene 77 (38.3) 20 (10.0)
Other regions 132 (16.0) 19 (2.3)
Ndh pseudogene + adjacent regions of ndh pseudogene 168 (26.6) 44 (7.0)
Open in a new tab

The figures in the bracket indicate the density (per kb) of SNPs or Indels in a target region.

3.3. Diversified evolution of plastomic sequence variability among Dendrobium species

Recent studies showed diversified evolution of the plastome sequence among different orchid genera39. In this study, to determine whether the evolution of SV was conserved within the genus of Dendrobium, we estimated the pairwised intraspecific SV of 90 syntenic non-coding loci including intergenic spacers and introns of D. officinale and its closely related species (Supplementary Information Table S3). Moreover, we also performed correlation tests for the 90 non-coding loci between the 5 species. Although they are closely related to each other, our results showed that the SV values were statistically uncorrelated (P>0.05) or weakly correlated (Spearman׳s r=0.208 to 0.458, P<0.05) between the 5 species. These results suggested that the evolution of SV among different Dendrobium species was variable.

The top-12 mutational hotspots that contain the highest intraspecific variability (SV>0.1%) and the lowest interspecific variability (SV<3%) of D. officinale were shown in Fig. 429. However, with the comparison of the SV values of other 4 species, our results have shown that: (1) none of top-12 hotspots is common to all the 5 species; (2) only 3 of them (rps2-rpoC2, accD-psaI, and matK-5′trnK) are present in more than 3 species. This pointed to the fact that the plastomic mutational hotspots for the intraspecific-level studies of Dendrobium species were diversified.

Figure 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

The pairwised intraspecific sequence variability (SV) of 90 syntenic non-coding loci among D. officinale and its closely related species. (A) The comparison of interspecific and intraspecific SV values for the loci in the plastome of D. officinale. The interspecific SV values of these loci were obtained from Niu et al29. (B) The twelve intergenic and intronic loci with the highest SV values in the plastome of D. officinale. (C) The comparison of interspecific and intraspecific SV values for the loci in the plastome of D. shixingense, D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum and D. aduncum, respectively. The intraspecific SV values of D. tosaense were excluded because of the limited variable sites. Only three loci of rps2-rpoC2, accD-psaI and matK-5′trnK (in red) are present in more than three species.

3.4. Species authentication analyses

DNA barcodes or plastome mutational hotspots, such as ITS43 ITS221, ITS+matK23, and trnT-trnL+rpl32-trnL+clpP-psbB+trnL intron+rps16-trnQ29, were demonstrated to have high discriminatory power for most Dendrobium species. However, as shown in Fig. 5 and Supplementary Information Fig. S1, they all failed to distinguish D. officinale and its closely related species. For example, in the ML tree inferred from ITS2 dataset, D. officinale, D. tosaense, D. shixingense, and D. scoriarum were nested with each other. Though the species of D. flexicaule formed a monophyletic group in the ML trees based on the ITS and ITS2+rbcL datasets, the support values were below 50%.

Figure 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

ML trees of D. officinale and its closely related species inferred from the complete plastome (left) and commonly used DNA markers (right). Each of the six species is color coded. Numbers near the nodes are bootstrap support values (only values >50% are shown).

By contrast, our analyses using the complete plastome dataset achieved satisfactory results as follows: (1) the phylogenetic tree yielded high resolution (bootstrap value (BS)>85%) for all tree nodes with few exceptions within some species; (2) the individuals of each of the 6 species were resolved as a monophyletic group. Furthermore, the complete plastome dataset also showed higher resolution than other plastome-scale datasets, i.e., LSC, SSC, IRs, protein-coding genes, and non-coding sequences (Supplementary Information Fig. S2). These results indicated that the complete plastome sequences could be used to identify D. officinale and its closely related species.

4. Discussion

4.1. Variations in the SSC regions of D. officinale and its closely related species were mainly contributed by the loss/retention of ndh genes

Although the plastomes of land plants are conserved in terms of genome structure and gene content, some structure changes (e.g., inversions, rearrangements, and IR expansion/contraction) and the sequence variations have been detected in complete plastomes24. In this study, while the plastomes of D. officinale and its closely related species were found to be highly conserved in plastome structure, and gene content and order, sequence variations (SNPs and Indels) were also observed in these plastomes. SNP loci and Indel events are very useful resources for phylogenetic analysis and species identification25; SNPs have been successfully used to infer the phylogenetic relationships within the genus of Citrus44, and Indels have been employed to design specific primers for authenticating buckwheat species45. Recently, Niu et al.29 revealed a nonrandom location of Indels in Dendrobium plastomes. In line with their findings, the present study demonstrated higher densities of SNPs and Indels in SSC than in LSC and IR regions, pointing to the fact that both Indels and SNPs were nonrandomly distributed in plastomes of D. officinale and its closely related species.

The remarkably higher SNP and Indel densities in SSC might be caused by 2 factors: (1) the drastic expansion/contraction of IRs and (2) the independent loss/retention of ndh genes. The expansion/contraction of IRs is known to be largely responsible for the variation of plastomes in different orchids46, 47 and many other species48, 49, 50. However, the current research showed that only slight changes occurred in the sequences flanking IR/SC boundaries among the plastomes of D. officinale and its closely related species, suggesting that the effect of expansion/contraction of IRs on the variation of SSC was negligible. This signified that the loss/retention of ndh genes was a potential determinant for the variation of SSC. Recent studies revealed an independent loss/retention of ndh genes in SSC region of Dendrobium plastomes29, which led us to expect a higher variation in their located regions. Indeed, we found that ndh pseudogenes and their adjacent intergenic spacer regions possessed a higher density and a larger number of variants (SNPs and Indels) than the other regions in SSC. Therefore, we infer that the loss/retention of ndh genes mainly accounted for the variation of SSC.

4.2. Plastome-wide comparison is required for studies of orchid species at different levels

Mutational hotspots of plastome sequences are the most useful tools for the systematic and phylogeographic studies at the different taxonomic levels. However, Shaw et al.51 showed that the hotspot regions were diverse among different plant lineages. For orchid species, different mutational hotspots have been proposed for different orchid genera, i.e., the loci of rpl32-trnL, trnH-psbA, trnE-trnT, trnK-rps16, and trnT-trnL were employed for the species identification study of Cymbidium52; and the loci of trnS-trnG, psaC-ndhE, clpP-psbB, rpl16 intron, rpoB-trnC, trnT-psbD, rbcL-accD, rpl32-trnL, ccsA-ndhD, and ndhC-trnV were listed as the top-10 mutational hotspots for the genus of Phalaenopsis51. Recently, on the basis of comprehensive plastome-wide comparison, Niu et al.39 found that the mutational hotspots for orchid species were genus specific; they also proposed the most valuable hotspot combination for the interspecific-level studies of Dendrobium genus29. However, the mutational hotspots for the intraspecific-level studies of Dendrobium species were still uncertain. For example, the loci of trnC-petN and trnE-trnT were employed to investigate the phylogeographic relationship among different population of D. moniliforme53, while the loci of accD-psaI, trnC-petN, and rps15-ycf1 were used to infer the phylogeographic history of D. officinale15. Thus, aiming to identify the mutational hotspots or combinations applicable for the intraspecific-level studies of Dendrobium species, we estimated the pairwised intraspecific SV of 90 syntenic non-coding loci of D. officinale and its closely related species. Nevertheless, our careful examination failed to select a common mutational hotspot for the 5 species D. officinale, D.shixingense, D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum, and D. aduncum, although they are closely related to each other. Our results indicated that the mutational hotspots for the intraspecific-level studies of Dendrobium species were diversified. Therefore, it is necessary to make a cautious evaluation of genetic markers specific for different Dendrobium species. Considering diversified mutational hotspots among different orchid genera and different species, we proposed that the plastome-wide comparison is required for studies of orchid species at different levels.

4.3. Complete plastome sequences can be used for the authentication of D. officinale and its closely related species

The accurate identification of medicinal plants is essential to their safe utilization and genetic resource conservation. However, Dendrobium species have been documented to be difficult for discrimination analysis due to their similar appearance and tissue structure9, 10, 11. Among them, D. officinale and its closely related species are a particularly difficult group for identification studies and phylogenetic analyses due to the overlapping morphological variations14, 54, 55, complex evolutionary histories15, and the lack of effective molecular markers. Previous molecular identification and phylogenetic studies about this group were generally focused on one or a few DNA regions, but none of them successfully resolved relationships among the 6 species, which was mainly due to the inadequate variations provided by a limited number of DNA loci14, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23. Recently, complete plastome sequences containing massive variable sites have been successfully applied to authenticate species and resettle the phylogenetic relationships in taxonomically difficult groups, such as Orychophragmus27, Cymbidium52, and Schima56. Thus, to overcome the disadvantage of lacking variations for DNA regions, the complete plastome was exploited to authenticate D. officinale and its closely related species and to resolve their relationships.

In comparison with previous studies, we proposed that the method of discriminating D. officinale and its closely related species by using the complete plastome sequences was highly reliable, accurate and feasible, as demonstrated by 3 facts as follows. Firstly, the relationships among D. officinale and its closely related species were resolved with high support values (BS>85%). As mentioned above, the complete plastome could provide sufficient informative sites, which can help to infer robust relationships for intractable groups at low taxonomic levels52, 56, 57. Secondly, the monophyletic groups of D. officinale, D. tosaense, D. shixingense, D. flexicaule, D. scoriarum, and D. aduncum resolved in this study were based on a comprehensive taxon sampling, which included representative individuals of documented main distribution areas for the 6 species. In previous studies, the sampling of these species was relatively limited. Moreover, D. shixingense (a recently reported species)55 or D. tosaense was always not included. In addition, other 21 Dendrobium species, which were often used as the adulterants of D. officinale on the marker, were also sampled in this study. Thirdly, it is becoming simple and relatively inexpensive to obtain the complete plastome. With the development of NGS technologies, the sequencing cost has fallen sharply. Furthermore, the approach of assembling plastome from genomic sequencing data has led to a convenient way to generate complete plastome sequences26. Therefore, the use of complete plastome is a promising way for authenticating Dendrobium species.

Dendrobium species are famous for their great medical values, which has led to many adulterants sold as the Material Medica from Dendrobium. Unfortunately, the use of many effective DNA markers, such as rbcL, matK and even the sequences of ITS or ITS2, could not effectively identify the Material Medica from Dendrobium, especially for D. officinale and its closely related species because of their close genetic relationships. In this study, we successfully authenticated D. officinale and its closely related species by using their complete plastome sequences, indicating that the complete plastome could be considered an efficient super-barcode58, 59 for the authentication of Material Medica from Dendrobium. Compared to conventional barcoding approaches, using the complete plastome as super-barcode has many advantages, including higher accuracy in taxonomically difficult groups, and universality, as it does not require the use of taxon-specific primers60, 61. On the other hand, the main challenges of super-barcoding are the establishment of a rich plastome database and the improvement of processing power and analytical capacity for big data. Nevertheless, with the rapid advancement of molecular technologies and methodologies, we believe that it will soon be practical to apply the complete plastomes to the authentication studies of most land plants.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the first study to authenticate the taxonomically difficult group of D. officinale and its closely related species. Firstly, we investigated the relationship between plastome variations and loss/retention of ndh genes, and found that the variations in the SSC regions of D. officinale and its closely related species were mainly contributed by the loss/retention of ndh genes. Then, based on plastome-wide comparison, our analysis revealed the diversified evolution of SV among these plastomes, signifying that the plastome-wide comparison is essential for studies of Dendrobium species at different levels. Most importantly, after having carefully examined the ML trees inferred from different sequence datasets, we proposed that D. officinale and its closely related species could be unequivocally distinguished using the complete plastome sequences.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31170300 and 31670330) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions to Xiaoyu Ding (Grant No. 2015-SWYY-014).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Chinese Pharmaceutical Association.

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.05.009.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

.

References

  • 1.Wood H.P. ARG Gantner Verlag; Ruggell: 2006. The Dendrobiums. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhu G.H., Ji Z.H., Wood J.J., Wood H.P. Scientific Press; Beijing: 2009. Flora of China. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Teixeira da Silva J.A., Jin X., Dobránszki J., Lu J., Wang H., Zotz G. Advances in Dendrobium molecular research: applications in genetic variation, identification and breeding. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;95:196–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bao X.S., Shun Q.S., Chen L.Z. Shanghai Medicinal University Press and Fudan University Press; Shanghai: 2001. The medicinal plants of Dendrobium (Shi-hu) in China. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsi Z.H. Science Press; Beijing: 1999. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li X., Ding X., Chu B., Zhou Q., Ding G., Gu S. Genetic diversity analysis and conservation of the endangered Chinese endemic herb Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo (Orchidaceae) based on AFLP. Genetica. 2008;133:159–166. doi: 10.1007/s10709-007-9196-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xu H., Hou B., Zhang J., Min T., Yuan Y., Niu Z. Detecting adulteration of Dendrobium officinale by real-time PCR coupled with ARMS. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2012;47:1695–1700. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ding G., Zhang D., Feng Z., Fan W., Ding X., SNP Li. X. ARMS and SSH authentication of medicinal Dendrobium officinale KIMURA et MIGO and application for identification of Fengdou Drugs. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008;31:553–557. doi: 10.1248/bpb.31.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang Y.B., Pui-Hay B.P., Wang Z.T., Shaw P.C. Current approaches for the authentication of medicinal Dendrobium species and its products. Plant Genet Resour. 2005;3:144–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Niu Z., Pan J., Xue Q., Zhu S., Liu W., Ding X. Plastome-wide comparison reveals new SNV resources for the authentication of Dendrobium huoshanense and its corresponding medicinal slice (Huoshan Fengdou) Acta Pharm Sin B. 2018;8:466–477. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yukawa T., Uehara K. Vegetative diversification and radiation in subtribe Dendrobiinae (Orchidaceae): evidence from chloroplast DNA phylogeny and anatomical characters. Plant Syst Evol. 1996;201:1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zha X.Q., Luo J.P., Wei P. Identification and classification of Dendrobium candidum species by fingerprint technology with capillary electrophoresis. S Afr J Bot. 2009;75:276–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang L., Wang Z., Xu L. Simultaneous determination of phenols (bibenzyl, phenanthrene, and fluorenone). Dendrobium species by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1104:230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiang X.G., Schuiteman A., Li D.Z., Huang W.C., Chung S.W., Li J.W. Molecular systematics of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae, Dendrobieae) from mainland Asia based on plastid and nuclear sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69:950–960. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hou B.W., Luo J., Zhang Y.S., Niu Z.T., Xue Q.Y., Ding X.Y. Iteration expansion and regional evolution: phylogeography of Dendrobium officinale and four related taxa in southern China. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43525. doi: 10.1038/srep43525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shen J., Ding X., Liu D., Ding G., He J., Li X. Intersimple sequence repeats (ISSR) molecular fingerprinting markers for authenticating populations of Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29:420–422. doi: 10.1248/bpb.29.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Feng S.G., Lu J.J., Gao L., Liu J.J., Wang H.Z. Molecular phylogeny analysis and species identification of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) in China. Biochem Genet. 2014;52:127–136. doi: 10.1007/s10528-013-9633-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kang J.Y., Lu J.J., Qiu S., Chen Z., Liu J.J., Wang H.Z. Dendrobium SSR markers play a good role in genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of Orchidaceae species. Sci Hort. 2015;183:160–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ding X.Y., Wang Z.T., Hong Xu, Xu L.S., Zhou K.Y. Database establishment of the whole rDNA ITS region of Dendrobium species of “Fengdou” and authentication by analysis of their sequences. Acta Pharm Sin. 2002;37:567–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takamiya T., Wongsawad P., Sathapattayanon A., Tajima N., Suzuki S., Kitamura S. Molecular phylogenetics and character evolution of morphologically diverse groups, Dendrobium section Dendrobium and allies. AoB Plants. 2014;6:plu045. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Feng S., Jiang Y., Wang S., Jiang M., Chen Z., Ying Q. Molecular identification of Dendrobium species (Orchidaceae) based on the DNA barcode ITS2 region and its application for phylogenetic study. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:21975–21988. doi: 10.3390/ijms160921975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xiang X.G., Mi X.C., Zhou H.L., Li J.W., Chung S.W., Li D.Z. Biogeographical diversification of mainland Asian Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) and its implications for the historical dynamics of evergreen broad-leaved forests. J Biogeogr. 2016;43:1310–1323. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu S., Li D., Li J., Xiang X., Jin W., Huang W. Evaluation of the DNA barcodes in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) from mainland Asia. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0115168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Raubeson L.A., Jansen R.K. Chloroplast genomes of plants. In: Henry R.J., editor. Plant diversity and evolution: genotypic and phenotypic variation in higher plants. CAB International; London: 2005. pp. 45–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tonti-Filippini J., Nevill P.G., Dixon K., Small I. What can we do with 1000 plastid genomes? Plant J. 2017;90:808–818. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nock C.J., Waters D.L., Edwards M.A., Bowen S.G., Rice N., Cordeiro G.M. Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9:328–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00558.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu H., Hu Q., Al-Shehbaz I.A., Luo X., Zeng T., Guo X. Species delimitation and interspecific relationships of the genus Orychophragmus (Brassicaceae) inferred from whole chloroplast genomes. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1826. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang N., Erickson D.L., Ramachandran P., Ottesen A.R., Timme R.E., Funk V.A. An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: implications for future botanical identification. Sci Rep. 2017;7:216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00321-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Niu Z., Zhu S., Pan J., Li L., Sun J., Ding X. Comparative analysis of Dendrobium plastomes and utility of plastomic mutational hotspots. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02252-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Luo J., Hou B.W., Niu Z.T., Liu W., Xue Q.Y., Ding X.Y. Comparative chloroplast genomes of photosynthetic orchids: insights into evolution of the Orchidaceae and development of molecular markers for phylogenetic applications. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang P., Zhou H., Qian J., Xu H., Shao Q., Li Y. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Dendrobium officinale. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016;27:1262–1264. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.945547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Niu Z., Xue Q., Wang H., Xie X., Zhu S., Liu W. Mutational biases and GC-biased gene conversion affect GC content in the plastomes of Dendrobium genus. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2307. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wyman S.K., Jansen R.K., Boore J.L. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3252–3255. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schattner P., Brooks A.N., Lowe T.M. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W686–W689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Frazer K.A., Pachter L., Poliakov A., Rubin E.M., Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W273–W279. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Niu Z., Xue Q., Zhu S., Sun J., Liu W., Ding X. The complete plastome sequences of four orchid species: insights into the evolution of the Orchidaceae and the utility of plastomic mutational hotspots. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:715. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Katoh K., Standley D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Palmer J.D. Comparative organization of chloroplast genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 1985;19:325–354. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.19.120185.001545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chattopadhyay P., Banerjee G., Banerjee N. Distinguishing orchid species by DNA barcoding: increasing the resolution of population studies in plant biology. OMICS. 2017;21:711–720. doi: 10.1089/omi.2017.0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Carbonell-Caballero J., Alonso R., Ibañez V., Terol J., Talon M., Dopazo J. A phylogenetic analysis of 34 chloroplast genomes elucidates the relationships between wild and domestic species within the genus Citrus. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:2015–2035. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cho K.S., Yun B.K., Yoon Y.H., Hong S.Y., Mekapogu M., Kim K.H. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) and comparative analysis with common buckwheat (F. esculentum) PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kim H.T., Kim J.S., Moore M.J., Neubig K.M., Williams N.H., Whitten W.M. Seven new complete plastome sequences reveal rampant independent loss of the ndh gene family across orchids and associated instability of the inverted repeat/small single-copy region boundaries. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Niu Z., Pan J., Zhu S., Li L., Xue Q., Liu W. Comparative analysis of the complete plastomes of Apostasia wallichii and Neuwiedia singapureana (Apostasioideae) reveals different evolutionary dynamics of IR/SSC boundary among photosynthetic orchids. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1713. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wu C.S., Lai Y.T., Lin C.P., Wang Y.N., Chaw S.M. Evolution of reduced and compact chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) in gnetophytes: selection toward a lower-cost strategy. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;52:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wu C.S., Wang Y.N., Hsu C.Y., Lin C.P., Chaw S.M. Loss of different inverted repeat copies from the chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae and Cupressophytes and influence of heterotachy on the evaluation of gymnosperm phylogeny. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:1284–1295. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sanderson M.J., Copetti D., Búrquez A., Bustamante E., Charboneau J.L., Eguiarte L.E. Exceptional reduction of the plastid genome of saguaro cactus (Carnegiea gigantea): loss of the ndh gene suite and inverted repeat. Am J Bot. 2015;102:1115–1127. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1500184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shaw J., Shafer H.L., Leonard O.R., Kovach M.J., Schorr M., Morris A.B. Chloroplast DNA sequence utility for the lowest phylogenetic and phylogeographic inferences in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare IV. Am J Bot. 2014;101:1987–2004. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yang J.B., Tang M., Li H.T., Zhang Z.R., Li D.Z. Complete chloroplast genome of the genus Cymbidium: lights into the species identification, phylogenetic implications and population genetic analyses. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ye M., Liu W., Xue Q., Hou B., Luo J., Ding X. Phylogeography of the endangered orchid Dendrobium moniliforme in East Asia inferred from chloroplast DNA sequences. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2017;28:880–891. doi: 10.1080/24701394.2016.1202942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jin X., Chen S., Luo Y. Taxonomic revision of Dendrobium moniliforme complex (Orchidaceae) Sci Hort. 2009;120:143–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen Z.L., Zeng S.J., Wu K.L., Duan J. Dendrobium shixingense sp. nov. (Orchidaceae) from Guangdong, China. Nord J Bot. 2010;28:723–727. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yu X.Q., Drew B.T., Yang J.B., Gao L.M., Li D.Z. Comparative chloroplast genomes of eleven Schima (Theaceae) species: insights into DNA barcoding and phylogeny. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li P., Zhang S., Li F., Zhang S., Zhang H., Wang X. A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes elucidates the relationships of the six economically important Brassica species comprising the triangle of U. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:111. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li X., Yang Y., Henry R.J., Rossetto M., Wang Y., Chen S. Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome. Biol Rev. 2015;90:157–166. doi: 10.1111/brv.12104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hollingsworth P.M., Li D.Z., van der Bank M., Twyford A.D. Telling plant species apart with DNA: from barcodes to genomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371:20150338. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kane N., Sveinsson S., Dempewolf H., Yang J.Y., Zhang D., Engels J.M.M. Ultra-barcoding in Cacao (Theobroma spp.; Malvaceae) using whole chloroplast genomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Am J Bot. 2012;99:320–329. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Coissac E., Hollingsworth P.M., Lavergne S., Taberlet P. From barcodes to genomes: extending the concept of DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:1423–1428. doi: 10.1111/mec.13549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES