Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2018 Apr 9;25(7):1375–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.04.011

Prevalence and characterization of hydatidosis in Najdi sheep slaughtered in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia

Abdel-Azeem S Abdel-Baki a,b,⁎, Esam Almalki c, Saleh Al-Quarishy a
PMCID: PMC6252011  PMID: 30505184

Abstract

Hydatidosis is considered to be one of the important zoonotic diseases and has a significant public health importance due to the difficulties of the diagnosis. Domestic animals act as intermediate hosts and the main reservoir for the disease in humans. The main purpose of this work therefore was to determine the prevalence of hydatidosis in Najdi sheep slaughtered in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. Cyst location and cyst fertility and viability were also estimated, together with effect of seasons, age and sex on the prevalence of the infection. The prevalence of hydatidosis was evaluated by post-mortem examination, with intensive inspection of the visceral organs of 2785 Najdi sheep. The infection was found to prevail throughout the year in both sex, with an overall prevalence of 2.33%. The highest prevalence was recorded in winter (6.48%) while the lowest was encountered in summer (1.36%). Females were proved to be more prone to infection (70.7%) than males (29.3%). In the present study, younger sheep tended to have a higher prevalence of infection than older ones. The most commonly infected organ was the liver, with a prevalence of 81.5%. The recorded cysts showed a fertility rate of 75.4%, and a high viability rate of 61.2%. Hepatic cysts were the most fertile and viable ones (46%), while calcified cysts were not recorded during the study. Measurements of recorded cysts in all organs ranged from 2 to 6 cm in diameter.

In conclusion, the high fertility and viability rate of the recorded cysts suggest that sheep are a potential source of hydatidosis transmission to dogs and the continuation of its life cycle in this region. Consequently, authorities are recommended to instigate stricter regulation of the slaughtering process, including the secure disposal of infected offal so as to minimise the transmission of cysts from slaughter houses, along with treatment of stray dogs.

Keywords: Hydatid, Echinococcus, Prevalence, Sheep, Fertility, Viability

1. Introduction

Hydatidosis is an important zoonotic disease in many parts of the world, including Saudi Arabia. The disease is caused by the larval stages of a taeniid-type tapeworm of the genus Echinococcus and poses a great threat to human health and livestock, with the latter especially causing great economic loss (Thompson and McManus, 2002, Eckert and Deplazes, 2004). Echinococcus taeniid-worm has a two-host life cycle in which canines serve as final hosts, while domestic livestock and wild ungulates act as intermediate hosts (Abdel-Baki et al., 2016, Eslami et al., 2016). Domestic livestock act as intermediate hosts which are the major reservoir for the disease in humans (Eckert and Deplazes, 2004). Accordingly, domestic livestock in rural communities are the main reservoir for the disease in humans as there is a greater contact between dogs and domestic animals in this environment (Almalki et al., 2017).

Careful diagnosis of hydatidosis in livestock is essential for the identification of the most important source of the spread of the disease (Cadavid Restrepo et al., 2016). Unfortunately, hydatidosis in the intermediate hosts (sheep, goat, camels, cattle, etc.) is normally asymptomatic and not apparent to farmers (Elham et al., 2014). In addition, there are normally no trustworthy techniques for the routine diagnosis of the hydatidosis infection in living animals, with only ultrasound and radiography able to detect the presence of the hydatid cysts (Eckert and Deplazes, 2004, Hayajneh et al., 2014). Meat inspection or post-mortem investigation is therefore essential in diagnosing hydatidosis and in determining its prevalence in various species of slaughtered animals, and therefore abattoirs are the best places to survey hydatidosis in livestock (Almalki et al., 2017). There is currently little data regarding the prevalence of hydatidosis in livestock in Middle Eastern countries including Saudi Arabia (Almalki et al., 2017), and information on the epidemiology of hydatidosis in the livestock in different regions of Saudi Arabia is particularly limited. The Najdi sheep is the principle breed of domestic sheep from Saudi Arabia. It is indigenous to the Najd region of Saudi Arabia where it possibly given its name. They are greatly appreciated for their meat, milk and also long and straight wool (Ali and Al-Noaim, 1992). According to the available literature, no studies have been carried out to assess the hydatidosis in Najdi sheep slaughtered in Riyadh city thus far. The present survey was therefore undertaken to determine the prevalence of hydatidosis in Najdi sheep in Riyadh city. Cyst location and cyst fertility and viability were also estimated, together with effect of seasons, age and sex on the prevalence of the infection.

2. Materials and methods

The present survey was carried out on 2785 Najdi sheep in an animal slaughterhouse in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between November 2015 to October 2016.

2.1. Examination of the slaughtered sheep

During the post-mortem examination, an intensive inspection of the visceral organs, notably the liver, lung, spleen, kidney and heart, was undertaken with the assistance of veterinarians in keeping with procedures counselled by WHO/FAO/UNEP (1994). Infected organs were immediately transported in ice boxes to the Laboratory of Parasitology, Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University. In the laboratory, all cysts were measured and cyst fertility and protoscolices viability were determined.

2.2. Assessment of cyst fertility and protoscolices viability

The hydatid cyst fluid was aspirated by means of a sterile syringe with a large-sized needle and then transferred into a sterile container. To determine the cyst fertility, the cyst fluid was examined microscopically for the presence or absence of the protoscolices. If protoscolices were not present, the cyst was considered to be infertile. The viability of protoscolices was determined by staining with a 0.1% aqueous eosin solution. Usually, the viable protoscolices do not take up the stain, whereas the non-viable ones do (Fig. 1) (Moazeni and Nazer, 2010).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Representative photos for the viability test; (A) viable protoscolices without staining (B) Viable protoscolices after staining with 0.1% eosin, (C) Dead protoscolices without staining, (D) Dead protoscolices after staining with 0.1% eosin. Scale-bar = 100 µm.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using a statistical package program (Sigma Plot version 11.0) and one-way ANOVA was performed to determine the statistically significant differences. Data were expressed as the means ± standard deviations from the means (SD) and P ≤ 0.005 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

The present study surveyed the hydatidosis in Najdi sheep slaughtered in an animal slaughterhouse in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. Cases of infection were found throughout the year, with an overall infection prevalence of 2.33% (65/2785). The highest prevalence was reported in winter 6.48% (25/385), followed by spring 2.29% (14/594) and autumn 1.47% (14/951), while the lowest was recorded in summer 1.36% (12/855). Statistical analyses showed no significant differences in the prevalence of infections among seasons during the period of this study (P = 0.30) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

The mean seasonal prevalence (% ± SD) of hydatidosis in slaughtered Najdi sheep.

The statistical evaluation did however reveal that the prevalence of infection differed significantly by host sex (P = 0.001). Females were found to have the highest prevalence of infection at 70.7% (46/65) compared to 29.2% (19/65) for males (Fig. 3). The study also revealed that infection varied according to the sheep’s age, with the highest prevalence of infection in sheep of 6–12 months’ age (47.7%, 31/65) followed by sheep aged more than 2 years (35.3%, 23/65), while sheep aged 13–24 months recorded the lowest prevalence of 17% (11/65). The statistical analysis, however, confirmed that these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.232) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

The mean prevalence (% ± SD) of hydatidosis in male and female of slaughtered Najdi sheep.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

The mean prevalence (% ± SD) of hydatidosis based on the age of slaughtered Najdi sheep.

Regarding the location of cysts, the liver was reported to have the highest prevalence of infection (81.5%, 53/65), followed by the lungs, with a prevalence of 10.8% (7/65), while synchronous infection of both liver and lungs together with other visceral organs showed the lowest prevalence of 7.7% (5/65). There were significant statistical differences in infection prevalence between liver and lung infection (P < 0.001), liver and concurrent infection of both liver and lung together with other visceral other visceral organs (P < 0.001), while there were no significant differences between lung and synchronous infection of both liver and lung together with other visceral organs (P = 0.760) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

The mean prevalence (% ± SD) of hydatid cyst according the infected organs of slaughtered Najdi sheep.

The fertility rate of the recorded cysts was 75.4% (49/65) with a viability rate of 61.2% (30/49). Hepatic cysts were the most fertile 71.4% (35/49) and viable 66.6% (20/30), while calcified cysts were not recorded during the study. Measurements of recorded cysts in all organs ranged from 2 to 6 cm in diameter.

4. Discussion

Hydatidosis has a cosmopolitan distribution from the Arctic circle in the North to as far South as Tierra del Fuego, Argentina, occurring in all major climates, in a wide variety of hosts and at various levels of prevalence (WHO/OIE, 2002). Infections with hydatid cysts occur in a broad spectrum of natural intermediate host species and cysts are found most frequently in the liver and lungs, although they can also occur in other internal organs including the nervous system, the skeletal muscles and in the bone marrow cavity (Thompson and McManus, 2002, Cadavid Restrepo et al., 2016). Domestic intermediate hosts (goat, sheep, cattle, camels, etc.) are the main reservoirs of hydatidosis for subsequent human infection (Ibrahim, 2010). Consequently, WHO/OIE (2002) has confirmed the necropsy of intermediate hosts for hydatid cysts as an essential for baseline surveys as well as for the surveillance of control programmes. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the prevalence of hydatidosis infection in Najdi sheep slaughtered in Riyadh city. The location of cysts, their size and fertility, as well as the viability of their protoscolices were also determined. In the present study, the hydatidosis infection revealed marked fluctuation during the study period, with a maximum prevalence in winter (6.48%) which then progressively decreased to a minimum prevalence in summer (1.36%). Similarly, Daryani et al., 2007, Almalki et al., 2017 found seasonal variation in infection prevalence, with the highest prevalence in winter and the lowest in summer. The seasonal variation in infection prevalence may related differences in the environmental conditions that are responsible for the spreading the parasite, the availability of infected final hosts, and the nature of the pasture among seasons (Ernest et al., 2009, Ibrahim, 2010).

Previous studies in other regions of Saudi Arabia, have revealed a rather higher prevalence of hydatidosis infection than the 2.33% found in this study: 12.61% in Al Baha (Ibrahim, 2010), 69.6% in Jeddah (Toulah et al., 2012) and 13.5% in Al Taif (Hayajneh et al., 2014), possibly indicating different factors affecting the transmission of this disease among the farm animals in these regions. Almalki et al. (2017), however, have recently reported a rather lower prevalence of infection (1.06%) in Sawakny sheep in Riyadh city. They attributed this lower prevalence to the fact that Riyadh is an urban region while the other areas are rural to semi-urban, incorporating Bedouin herds that often have dogs for keeping watch and hunting, meaning that dogs are in close contact with domestic animals and humans, potentially promoting transmission of the disease in these areas. Improvements in living conditions and a better awareness of the risk of zoonotic diseases has also been argued to contribute to the lower incidence in Riyadh (Almalki et al., 2017).

The results also showed that hydatidosis is markedly more prevalent in females (70.7%) than in males (29.3%). This may have related to a combination of factors such as hormonal differences, genetic composition and the host-parasite interaction (Blancas Mosqueda et al., 2007, Roostaei et al., 2017). These results are in agreement with previous studies carried out in Saudi Arabia (Ibrahim, 2010) and other countries (Esatgil and Tüzer, 2007, Azami et al., 2013, Nyero et al., 2015).

The current study elucidated that younger sheep had a higher prevalence of infection than older ones, which is in accordance with the results of Hayajneh et al., 2014, Almalki et al., 2017. This finding may be explained by the fact that the inhabitants of Riyadh prefer to slaughter younger sheep rather than older ones and consequently most of the sheep slaughtered in Riyadh abattoirs are young (Al-Qureishy, 2008). In contrast to this finding, most of the previous studies (e.g. Ibrahim, 2010, Al-Qurashi and Bahnass, 2012, Elmajdoub and Rahman, 2015) have suggested a higher rate of infection among older animals than younger ones.

In the present study, the livers were found to be more frequently infected with hydatid cysts than the lungs and other organs, which is compatible with several previous studies (e.g. Azlaf and Dakkak, 2006, Haridy et al., 2006, Ibrahim, 2010, Toulah et al., 2012, Almalki et al., 2017). This may due to the fact that oncosphere penetrates the intestinal wall and enters the portal blood/lymph where they are transported passively throughout the body to the major filtering organs, mainly the liver, where they are localized and develop into larval hydatid cysts. Only those that are not removed in the liver can move to develop in the other organs (Al-Khalidi, 1998).

Data on the fertility and viability of the hydatid cysts in specific domesticated animals is crucial to provide an indication of the importance of each kind of livestock as a manageable wellspring of final hosts infection, particularly dogs. Usually, the hydatid cysts have diverse rates of fertility according to their measurements, host type and site of infection (Dalimi et al., 2002). In the current study, it was noticed that the liver cysts were more fertile than these of the lungs, which is similar those reported by Ibrahim, 2010, Elmajdoub and Rahman, 2015, Almalki et al., 2017.

In conclusion, this study has revealed a considerably lower infection rate in Riyadh compared to those reported in other locations in Saudi Arabia, probably reflecting a variation in infection rates according to the rural or urban status of each location. The high fertility and viability rates of the reported cysts have an epidemiological significance since they suggest an increased potential for transmission to dogs and thus the continuation of the hydatidosis life cycle in this region. Consequently, more action is recommended to control hydatidosis in Riyadh. To attain this goal, stronger tracking of the slaughtering process is recommended together with the treatment of stray dogs. More efforts also need to be made to control the transmission of cysts from slaughter houses by way of the secure disposal of infected offal.

Conflict of interest statement

We declare there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

We extend our appreciation to the Dean of Scientific Research, King Saud University, for funding the work through the research group project number RGP -004.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Abdel-Baki A.S., Almalki E., Mansour L., Al-Quarishy S. In vitro scolicidal effects of Salvadora persica root extract against protoscolices of Echinococcus granulosus. Kor. J. Parasitol. 2016;54:61–66. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali K.E., Al-Noaim A.A. Copper status of Najdi sheep in eastern Saudi Arabia under penned and grazing conditions. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod. 1992;24:115–120. doi: 10.1007/BF02356955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Khalidi, N.W., 1998. Cystic echinococcus in sheep, goats and camels in shahat abattoir. Al- jabal, Libya. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting for Animal Production under Arid Condition, vol. 1, pp. 143–149.
  4. Almalki E., Al-Quraishy S., Abdel-Baki A.S. Assessment of prevalence of hydatidosis in slaughtered Sawakny sheep in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017;24:1534–1537. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.01.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-Qurashi A.M., Bahnass M.M. Some epidemiological and serological studies on hydatidosis in Najran region. J. Am. Sci. 2012;8:918–921. [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Qureishy S.A. Prevalence of cestode parasites in sheep slaughtered in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 2008;38:273–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Azami M., Anvarinejad M., Ezatpour B., Alirezaei M. Prevalence of hydatidosis in slaughtered animals in Iran. Turkiye Parazitol. Derg. 2013;37:102–106. doi: 10.5152/tpd.2013.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Azlaf R., Dakkak A. Epidemiological study of the cystic echinococcosis in Morocco. Vet. Parasitol. 2006;137:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blancas Mosqueda M., Herrera Esparza R., Rodríguez Padilla C., Tavizón García J.P., Mercado Reyes M., Badillo Almaraz V., Echavarría F., López Saucedo A., Mondragón de la Peña C. Gender as a factor of susceptibility to infection in experimental hydatidosis. Rev. Latinoam Microbiol. 2007;9:31–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cadavid Restrepo A.M., Yang Y.R., McManus D.P., Gray D.J., Giraudoux P., Barnes T.S., Williams G.M., Soares Magalhães R.J., Hamm N.A., Clements A.C. The landscape epidemiology of echinococcoses. Infect. Dis. Poverty. 2016;5:13. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0109-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalimi A., Motamedi G., Hosseini M., Mohammadian B., Malaki H., Ghamari Z., Ghaffari Far F. Echinococcosis/hydatidosis in western Iran. Vet. Parasitol. 2002;105:161–171. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Daryani A., Alaei R., Arab R., Sharif M., Dehghan M.H., Ziaei H. The prevalence, intensity and viability of hydatid cysts in slaughtered animals in the Ardabil province of Northwest Iran. J. Helminthol. 2007;81:13–17. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X0720731X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eckert J., Deplazes P. Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004;17:107–135. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.107-135.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Elham, M., Hassan, B., Ghasem, N.A., Gholamreza, R., Parviz, S., 2014. Epidemiological study of hydatidosis in the dromedaries (Camelus dromedarius) of different regions of Iran. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 4, 48–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Elmajdoub L.O., Rahman W.A. Prevalence of hydatid cysts in slaughtered animals from different areas of Libya. Open J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2015;5:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ernest E., Nonga H.E., Kassuku A.A., Kazwala R.R. Hydatidosis of slaughtered animals in Ngorongoro district of Arusha region, Tanzania. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2009;41:1179–1185. doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9298-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eslami A., Meshgi B., Jalousian F., Rahmani S., Salari M.A. Genotype and phenotype of Echinococcus granulosus derived from wild sheep (Ovis orientalis) in Iran. Kor. J. Parasitol. 2016;54:55–60. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Esatgil M.U., Tüzer E. Prevalence of hydatidosis in slaughtered animals in Thrace, Turkey. Turkiye Parazitol. Derg. 2007;31:41–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haridy F.M., Ibrahim B.B., Elshazly A.M., Awad S.E., Sultan D.M., El-Sherbini G.T., Morsy T.A. Hydatidosis granulosus in Egyptian slaughtered animals in the years 2000–2005. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 2006;36:1087–1100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayajneh F.M.F., Althomali A.M.H., Nasr A.T.M. Prevalence and characterization of hydatidosis in animals slaughtered at Al Taif abattoir, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Open J. Anim. Sci. 2014;4:38–41. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ibrahim M.M. Study of cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered animals in Al Baha region, Saudi Arabia: interaction between some biotic and abiotic factors. Acta Trop. 2010;113:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Moazeni M., Nazer A. In vitro effectiveness of garlic (Allium sativum) extract on scolices of hydatid cyst. World J. Surg. 2010;34:2677–2681. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0718-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nyero D., Zirintunda G., Omadang L., Ekou J. Prevalence of hydatid cysts in goats and sheep slaughtered in Soroti Municipal Abattoir, Eastern Uganda. Afr. J. Parasitol. Res. 2015;2:148–151. [Google Scholar]
  24. Roostaei M., Fallah M., Maghsood A.H., Saidijam M., Matini M. Prevalence and fertility survey of hydatid cyst in slaughtered livestock in Hamadan abattoir, Western Iran, 2015–2016. Avicenna J. Clin. Microb. Infec. 2017;4:e43361. [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson R.C., McManus D.P. Towards a taxonomic revision of the genus Echinococcus. Trends Parasitol. 2002;18:452–457. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02358-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Toulah F.H., El Shafei A.A., Alsolami M.N. Prevalence of hydatidosis among slaughtered animals in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 2012;42:563–572. doi: 10.12816/0006341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. WHO/FAO/UNEP, 1994. Guidelines for surveillance, prevention and control of echinococcosis/hydatidosis. Document No. VPH/81.28. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  28. WHO/OIE, 2002. Manual on echinococcosis in Humans and Animals: a Public Health Problem of Global Concern. World Organization for Animal Health 12, rue de Prony, 75017 Paris, France, pp. 286.

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES