Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2018 Nov 14;285(1891):20182027. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2027

Comparative biogeography: innovations and the rise to dominance of the North Pacific biota

Geerat J Vermeij 1,
PMCID: PMC6253370  PMID: 30429310

Abstract

The North Pacific is the largest cold-water source of lineages spreading to other modern marine temperate biotas. How this status was achieved remains unclear. One hypothesis is that functional innovations of large effect, defined as departures from the norm in temperate clades and which confer competitive or defensive benefits, increase resource availability, and raise performance standards in the biota as a whole, evolved earlier and more frequently in the North Pacific than elsewhere in the temperate zone. In support of this hypothesis, phylogenetic and fossil evidence reveals 47 temperate marine innovations beginning in the latest Eocene, of which half arose in the North Pacific. Of the 22 innovations of large effect, 13 (39%) evolved in the North Pacific, including basal growth in kelps and bottom-feeding herbivory and durophagy in mammals. Temperate innovations in the Southern Hemisphere and the North Atlantic appeared later and were less consequential. Most other innovations arose in refuges where the risks of predation and competition are low. Among temperate marine biotas, the North Pacific has the highest incidence of unique innovations and the earliest origins of major breakthroughs, five of which spread elsewhere.

Keywords: innovation, biogeography, North Pacific, faunal dominance, Caenozoic

1. Background

The question of where and when evolutionary innovations arise and spread has occupied scientists for many years. The answers are important because such innovations, which represent departures from the norm in a clade, can in some cases act as breakthroughs that lead to new or more intense patterns of natural selection and to lineage diversification.

It has become clear that isolated, island-like habitats permit many new forms and functions to evolve, but their isolation ensures that the novelties rarely spread and, in any case, do not often meet the performance standards in larger settings where diversity is higher [1].

If high-performance innovations contribute to the overall competitive vigour in a region with a large species pool, their number should be higher per species than in a more isolated setting. This expectation is borne out in the modern marine tropics, where molluscan innovations are more frequent per species in the Indo-West Pacific than in the less diverse, more extinction-prone Atlantic-East Pacific realm [1].

Here I extend this line of enquiry into the world's temperate marine regions. Among modern shallow-water temperate marine biotas, that of the North Pacific is the largest, most diverse and most biogeographically dominant [2]. This biota has exported more lineages to other temperate regions than have the biotas in the Southern Hemisphere and the North Atlantic [2]. Given its dominant status, the North Pacific should have spawned a larger number of functional and ecological innovations than other marine regions outside the tropics.

I distinguish two classes of innovation based on how they contribute to the ecosystems in which they arise. The first comprises innovations of large effect, which either facilitate evolution in other species by stimulating productivity or by making resources more accessible, or which increase the competitive or defensive capacities of their bearers. The effect of these innovations is therefore to raise performance standards in the system as a whole. The second category comprises innovations promoting specialization to a refugial mode of life, where risks from predators and competitors are reduced. Refugial innovations would therefore be favoured in regions where innovations of large effect increase the overall risk of predation and competition: they enable lineages that do not occupy top competitive positions in the ecosystem to make a living in relative safety. High-performance innovations might be expected to spread beyond the region in which they arose, whereas refugial innovations might be less likely to expand geographically.

2. Material and methods

I surveyed the taxonomic, phylogenetic, palaeontological and biogeographic literature on temperate marine multicellular organisms to identify traits representing innovations, defined for the purposes of this paper as morphological or ecological features that are departures from prevailing temperate norms in clades in which these new states evolved. Every effort was made to ensure that the search for innovations was exhaustive and representative. I accepted only those innovations for which the region of origin could be inferred from the fossil record or from phylogenetic relationships. Only innovations that arose during and after the Late Eocene, when the first substantial cooling occurred at high latitudes, were considered. Innovations that originated in the tropics or in a temperate area other than the focal temperate region were excluded. In other words, departures from the phenotypic norm were accepted if they evolved in situ in a given marine temperate region. If an innovation arose independently in more than one temperate region, it was counted for each region in which it arose. Although large size confers obvious benefits and often exceeds previously established size limits in a clade, I did not consider size increase beyond this limit as an innovation, because it does not by itself represent a morphological or ecological novelty.

3. Results and discussion

Innovations in the temperate marine realm are rare. I uncovered only 47 innovations distributed among 60 clades: 10 mammals, six birds, three teleost fishes, two echinoderms, one decapod, three Polyplacophora, 29 gastropods, five bivalves and two brown algae. No innovations were found in sponges, cnidarians, nematodes and related ecdysozoan phyla, annelids, nemerteans, brachiopods, bryozoans, scaphopods and cephalopods. These findings reflect real underlying patterns as well as limited phylogenetic and fossil evidence for some groups, but there is no geographical bias in what is known and what is not known.

I identified 24 innovations in 32 clades that evolved in situ in the North Pacific (table 1). At least 13 (59%) are innovations of large effect, five of which spread beyond the North Pacific. At least three innovations, all involving endotherms, evolved earlier in the North Pacific than in other temperate regions, where similar innovations evolved independently later.

In situ innovations are less frequent and evolved later in other temperate marine regions. There are ten in 13 clades in southern South America, five (50%) of which are of large effect; four innovations in four clades in southern Africa, one of large effect; four innovations in four clades in Australasia, one of large effect; and five innovations in six clades in the North Atlantic, two of large effect. Of a total of 23 innovations in these regions, only three evolved nowhere else in the temperate zone, a number significantly lower than the 15 unique North Pacific innovations (chi-square test, p < 0.01). Only two innovations, both from South America, including one of large effect, spread to other temperate regions. The North Pacific thus stands out as the region with the highest proportion and earliest origins of innovations of large effect and of unique innovations.

(a). North Pacific innovations

The most consequential North Pacific innovations are basal growth and a vascular system in laminarialean brown kelps, interpreted as adaptations to intense grazing [3]; and the related Early Oligocene colonization of desmostylians, the earliest large marine herbivorous mammals outside the tropics [4]. Kelps spread to all other temperate marine regions around the Miocene–Pliocene boundary [5] and became highly productive on temperate coasts. Neither the desmostylians, which became extinct in the Late Miocene, nor the later hydrodamaline sea cows that replaced them as herbivores, expanded beyond the North Pacific. Among kelps, an additional uniquely North Pacific innovation of uncertain function is perforation of the blades in members of the Arthrothamnaceae [5], several of which spread to the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans.

Another North Pacific innovation with large ripple effects was the in situ evolution of durophagy, defined as the predation of hard-shelled animals by means of breakage or other extractive techniques. The most important durophages in the North Pacific are large mammals, beginning with Kolponomos in the Late Oligocene [6] and followed successively by walruses (Odobenidae) and the extinct sea-lion genus Gomphotaria [7,8] during the Late Miocene, and the sea otter Enhydra during the Pliocene [9,10]. In each of these lineages, durophagy is a derived condition evolving from more raptorial modes of predation on more active prey. Suction-feeding walruses and shell-breaking sea otters expanded into the North Atlantic [11], although Enhydra became extinct there in the Pleistocene [9].

Besides limiting the abundance of small herbivores and therefore indirectly favouring the growth of algae including kelps, durophages probably became potent selective agents for benthic molluscs, echinoderms and crustaceans. At least six innovations are interpretable as anti-predatory or competition-enhancing adaptations: cementation by the scallop Crassadoma [12,13], plicate valves in the Miocene mussel Plicatomytilus [14], carcinization (adoption of a crab-like form in which the abdomen is held beneath the body in lithodid crustaceans from a hermit-crab ancestor) [15,16], coverage of the valves by the girdle in the chitons Cryptochiton and Amicula [17], territoriality and aggression in the limpet Lottia gigantea [18], and rock excavation by the limpet L. scabra [19]. Two of these innovations (carcinization and chiton valve coverage) spread to other temperate regions, the Southern Hemisphere and North Atlantic respectively.

Additional innovations enhancing competitive ability or enabled by high productivity remained confined to the North Pacific. These include photosymbiosis in the cockle Clinocardium nuttalli [20], excavation of bivalve prey from deep sediments by the sea star Pisaster brevispinus [21,22], and suspension-feeding by the sand dollar Dendraster [23,24] and some Miocene salmon of the genus Oncorhynchus [25].

Table 1.

Innovations in the coastal temperate marine realm. LE, Innovations of large effect; R, Refugial innovations; S, Innovations that spread beyond the region of origin; U, Unique innovations in the temperate realm.

Biota, innovation and clade Type
North Pacific
Herbivory by large endotherms, Desmostylia LE
Durophagy by large endotherms, Kolponomos, Odobenidae, Gomphotaria, Enhydra LE, S
Excavation of deep-burrowing prey by sea stars, Pisaster LE, U
Filter-feeding by salmonids, Oncorhyncus LE, U
Suspension feeding by sand dollars, Dendraster LE, U
Territoriality in limpets, Lottia gigantea LE
Rock excavation by limpets, Lottia scabra LE
Valve encasement in chitons, Cryptochiton, Amicula LE, S, U
Photosymbiosis in bivalves, Clinocardium nuttalli LE, U
Basal growth and vascular system in algae, Laminariales LE, S, U
Perforated blades in algae, Arthrothamnaceae
Carcinization in hermit crabs, Pagurus to Lithodidae LE, S, U
Algal-stipe excavation by limpets, Lottia instabilis R
Flightlessness in birds, Plotopteridae, Mancallinae, Chendytes
Life on algal blades by chitons, Juvenichiton R, U
Life on shells by limpets, Garnotia norrissiarum, Lottia asmi
Limpet form in gastropods, Piliscus
Slug form in gastropods, Onchidiopsinae
Cementation in bivalves, Crassadoma LE, U
Rock-boring in bivalves, Platyodon R
Bivalve living in ascidians, Mytilimeria nuttalli R, U
Plicate valves in mussels, Plicatomytilus LE, U
Sinistral coiling in gastropods, Neptunea, Pyrulofusus R
Southern South America
Herbivory by large endotherms, Thalassocnus LE
Durophagy by large endotherms, Kadrokirus, Odobenocetops, Lontra LE
Labral tooth in gastropods, Acanthina clade, Concholepas LE, S
Flightlessness in birds, Tachyeres
Intertidal algal grazing by fishes, Sicyases LE
Slug habit in gastropods, Buchanania
Limpet form in gastropods, Concholepas
Algal-stipe excavation by limpets, Scurria scurria R
Rock excavation by limpets, Scurria LE
Sinistral coiling in gastropods, Antistreptus R
Southern Africa
Gardening on shell, Bullia U
Algal-stipe excavation by limpets, Cymbula R
Algal gardening by limpets, Scutellastra LE
Labral tooth in gastropods, “Thais” squamosa
Australasia
Algal grazing by fishes, Odacinae LE
Labral tooth in gastropods, Iosepha
Envelopment of shell by mantle, Tylospira
Slug habit in gastropods, Smeagol
North Atlantic
Flightlessness in birds, Pinguinus
Durophagy by large endoderms, Mustela macrodon LE
Suction-feeding in birds, Alle alle LE, U
Algal-stipe excavation by limpets, Patella pellucida R
Sinistral coiling in gastropods, Neptunea, “Terebrainversa R

At least 12 of 13 innovations of large effect (92%) led to increases in body size [3]. Uniquely gigantic size, enabled by high productivity, distinguishes the North Pacific from other temperate biotas [3] and also occurs in many lineages without obvious morphological innovations.

Apart from the Palaeocene origin of penguins in the Southern Hemisphere, flightlessness in Late Eocene and later fish-eating birds evolved earlier and more often in the North Pacific than elsewhere, perhaps in response to reduced predation. The earliest to become flightless were penguin-like plotopterids [26], followed by Middle Miocene mancalline auks [27,28] and the Pleistocene duck Chendytes [29]. The recently extinct cormorant Phalacrocorax perspicillatus had strongly reduced wings and was at best a poor flier [30]. Increases in body size mark the history of flightlessness in all these lineages [2830].

A North Pacific innovation that is unique among Polyplacophora is the presence of a ligament-like feature in the centre of each intermediate valve in Schizoplax brandtii. This feature has never been studied and its function is unknown.

Refugial innovations in the North Pacific include rock-boring in the bivalve Platyodon [31,32], life on algal blades by Juvenichiton and related chitons [33], stipe excavation by the limpet Lottia instabilis [34], occupation of outer shell surfaces of living gastropods by the limpet Lottia asmi and the calyptraeid slipper limpet Garnotia norrisiarum [35], and life of the bivalve Mytilimeria nuttalli inside ascidians [36]. The transition from right-handed (dextral) to left-handed (sinistral) coiling in marine gastropods is rare, but occurs in three North Pacific lineages: Neptunea leva in the Okhotsk Sea, the buccinid Pyrulofusus in the far North Pacific, and the pseudomelatomid Antiplanes with origins in the northwestern Pacific [37]. This minor innovation occurs most commonly in environments where predation on eggs and egg masses on the seafloor is reduced [37]. A transition from coiled ancestors to a limpet-like form and to a slug without a shell occurred separately in the North Pacific velutinid Piliscus [38] and the velutinid subfamily Onchidiopsinae [39], respectively. Among these innovations, left-handedness in Pyrulofusus spread to the Arctic Ocean (but not the Atlantic) and the limpet and slug expanded to the North Atlantic.

(b). Other temperate regions

Far fewer innovations originated in other temperate biotas. In South America, innovations of large effect arose later: algal grazing by the intertidal clingfish Sicyases sanguineus [40], herbivory by the Late Miocene to Early Pliocene marine sloth Thalassocnus [41], durophagy in three mammalian lineages, the Late Miocene to Early Pliocene seal Hadrokirus [42] and cetacean Odobenocetops [43] and the Pleistocene to Recent otter genus Lontra [4], and the predation-enhancing labral tooth in two gastropod lineages, the Acanthina clade and Concholepas [44]. Rock excavation evolved in situ by a lineage of scurriine limpets [45].

Innovations to a refugial life include the limpet form in Concholepas during the Middle Miocene [46], shell envelopment and the slug habit in the keyhole limpet Buchanania [47], algal-stipe excavation in Scurria scurra [45], and sinistral coiling in the buccinid Antistreptus [37].

Flightlessness evolved in the steamer duck Tachyeres during the Early Pleistocene [48].

Three of the four southern African innovations involve relationships between animals and algae: algal gardening on the shell by the nassariid gastropod Bullia [49] and by the territorial limpet genus Scutellastra [18,50]. The fourth innovation, a small labral tooth in ‘Thaissquamosa [42], is at best a minor predation-enhancing feature.

In temperate Australasia, and early (Oligocene) and important innovation was specialized herbivory by odacine wrasses [51]. Other novelties are minor: a small labral tooth in the buccinid Iosepha [44], shell envelopment in the struthiolariid Tylospira [52], and the slug habit in the pulmonate Smeagol [53].

Large-effect innovations in the North Atlantic appeared in the Pliocene or later: durophagy by the sea mink (Mustela macrodon) in eastern North America during the Late Pleistocene [4], suction-feeding in the planktovorous auk Alle alle from fish-eating ancestors during the Pliocene [54,55], and flightlessness in the great auk Pinguinus [27]. Two refugial innovations evolved during the Pliocene: stipe excavation by the limpet Patella pellucida [33] and sinistral coiling in the buccinid Neptunea and the extinct North Sea ‘Terebrainversa [37].

4. General discussion

Cairns and colleagues [56] pointed out that endothermic vertebrates (mammals and birds) are generally the top predators in high-latitude oceans, whereas ectothermic fishes occupy that role in tropical seas. They noted that burst swimming speeds of ectotherms are temperature-dependent whereas those of endotherms are not, so that cold-water endotherms have a locomotor advantage in catching ectothermic prey, whereas warm-water endotherms do not. Temperature also affects muscle-generated forces applied in subduing prey. For bottom-dwelling marine animals and algae, therefore, the primary selective agents in temperate waters are usually endotherms (especially mammals), whereas on tropical coasts they tend to be ectothermic fishes, reptiles, crustaceans, and even molluscs and echinoderms. Herbivorous sirenian mammals are exceptions in that they have been important consumers of tropical seagrasses since the Eocene.

Flying birds are ecologically important on all coasts, including tropical shores, but they are likely to be secondary as selective agents to tropical crustaceans [57] and to temperate marine mammals because of their relatively small body sizes. It is notable that flightless marine birds, which tend to be larger than their flying counterparts, occur only in temperate and polar seas and are absent from more tropical mainland coasts. Tool use (by otters in the North Pacific) and shell-dropping (by gulls and crows) are also restricted to tropical coasts. Limits at low temperatures on calcification and force production constrain the adaptive responses of many temperate marine animals to intense selection from durophages, tilting the advantage toward endotherms even further.

Habitat specialization to refuges, however, should be little affected by temperature.

In short, the presence and early evolution of large endothermic marine mammals and birds in the North Pacific could go a long way toward accounting for the rise of the North Pacific biota to its current position as the dominant marine donor biota in the temperate realm. Through their strong ecological and evolutionary effects, these early endotherms and their successors raised the performance standards in the North Pacific biota as a whole to· high levels allowed by thermal conditions. In addition, durophagy by late-appearing South American otters and western Atlantic sea mink is much less specialized than that of North Pacific mammals.

An additional indication of the outsized role of the North Pacific in temperate biogeography, is that stipe-excavating limpets in South America, southern Africa and the North Atlantic evolved in response to the arrival of North Pacific kelps. European and South American kelps are derived directly from North Pacific ancestors, whereas those in southern Africa came from the North Atlantic by trans-equatorial dispersal [5,58]. In other words, without the North Pacific as the ultimate source of ecologically dominant lineages, temperate regions elsewhere would have witnessed even fewer innovations than they did.

In striking contrast to North Pacific innovations, many of which spread to other temperate regions, the innovations originating in temperate regions outside the North Pacific almost never spread beyond their areas of origin. The only two exceptions are South American: the labral tooth in the Acanthina clade, originating during the Oligocene and spreading to the northeastern Pacific and perhaps to southern Africa soon thereafter [44]; and the labral tooth in Concholepas concholepas, a lineage that spread briefly to southern Africa but not known to be living there today [59].

It may simply be an accident of geographical proximity to continents with large mammal faunas that the North Pacific was colonized early and often by mammalian lineages that subsequently became important marine herbivores and durophages. What is less clear is why such mammals were so late in appearing in southern South America or the North Atlantic. The North Atlantic biota lacking mammalian durophages until the Pliocene, when two walrus lineages, Ontocetus and later Odobenus, arrived from the North Pacific [8,11], followed in the Pleistocene by the sea otter [9]. Durophagous mammals never colonized or evolved in southern Africa or Australasia despite the presence of diverse pinnipeds and cetaceans there.

5. Conclusion

This investigation of the rise of the North Pacific biota to biogeographic supremacy through the evolution of innovations illustrates the value of placing such novelties in a comparative geographical context. Innovations of large effect, such as durophagy by animals with high metabolic rates, affect the distribution and evolution not only of the species directly targeted by these consumers, but of many other species as well, with important consequences for the biota as a whole. Biogeography and evolution are inextricably linked through feedbacks among enabling factors like the distribution of temperature, nutrients, and geographical features; and selective agents, the organisms that impose and respond to competition and consumption [60].

Data accessibility

All data are in the paper.

Competing interests

I have no competing interests.

Funding

I have no external funding.

References

  • 1.Vermeij GJ. 2012. Crucibles of creativity: the geographical origins of tropical molluscan innovations. Evol. Ecol. 26, 357–373. ( 10.1007/s10682-010-9458-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vermeij GJ, Banker R, Capece ER, Hernandez ES, Salmon SO, Vriesman VP, Wortham BE. In press The coastal North Pacific: origins and history of a dominant marine biota. J. Biogeogr. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vermeij GJ. 2012. The evolution of gigantism on temperate seashores. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 106, 776–793. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01897.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vermeij GJ, Motani R. 2018. Land to sea transitions in vertebrates: the dynamics of colonization. Paleobiology 44, 237–250. ( 10.1017/pab.2017.37) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jackson C, Salomaki ED, Lane CE, Saunders GW. 2017. Kelp transcriptomes provide robust support for interfamilial relationships and revision of the little known Arthrothamnaceae (Laminariales). J. Phycol. 53, 1–6. ( 10.1111/jpy.12465) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tseng ZJ, Grohé C, Flynn JJ. 2016. A unique feeding strategy of the extinct marine mammal Kolponomos: convergence on sabertooths and sea otters. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20160044 ( 10.1098/rspb.2016.0044) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barnes LG, Raschke RE. 1991. Gomphotaria pugnax, a new genus and species of Late Miocene dusignathine otariid pinniped (Mammalia: Carnivora) from California. Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County 426, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boessenecker RW, Churchill M. 2013. A reevaluation of the morphology, paleoecology, and phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic walrus Pelagiarctos. PLoS ONE 8, e54311 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0054311) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Willemsen GF. 1992. A revision of the Pliocene and Quaternary Lutrinae from Europe. Scr. Geol. 101, 1–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Timm-Davis LL, Davis RW, Marshall CD. 2017. Durophagous biting in sea otters (Enhydra lutris) differs kinematically from raptorial biting of other marine mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 4703–4710. ( 10.1242/jeb.162966) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boessenecker SJ, Boessenecker RW, Geisler JH. 2018. Youngest record of the extinct walrus. Ontocetus emmonsi from the Early Pleistocene of South Carolina and a review of North Atlantic walrus biochronology. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 63, 279–286. ( 10.4202/app.00454.2018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yonge CM. 1951. Studies on Pacific coast mollusks. III. Observations on Hinnites multirugosus (Gale). Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 55, 409–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saavedra C, Peña JB. 2006. Phylogenetics of American scallops (Bivalvia: Pectinidae) based on partial 16S and 12S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Mar. Biol. 150, 111–119. ( 10.1007/s00227-006-0335-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yoshida K. 1998. Formation of plications in the Miocene bivalve Mytilus (Plicatomytilus) sakurai as a consequence of architectural constraint. Paleontol. Res. 2, 224–238. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tsang LM, Chan T-Y, Ahyong ST, Chu KH. 2011. Hermit to king, or hermit to all: multiple transitions to crab-like forms from hermit crab ancestors. Syst. Biol. 60, 616–629. ( 10.1093/sysbio/syr063) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Noever C, Glenner H. 2018. The origin of king crabs: hermit crab ancestry under the magnifying glass. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 182, 300–318. ( 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx033) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sigwart JD, Stoeger I, Knebelsberger T, Schwabe E. 2013. Chiton phylogeny (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) and the placement of the enigmatic species Choriplax grayi (A. Adams and Angas). Invertebr. Syst. 27, 603–621. ( 10.1071/IS13013) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lindberg DR. 2007. Reproduction, ecology and evolution of the Indo-Pacific limpet Scutellastra flexuosa. Bull. Mar. Sci. 81, 219–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lindberg DR, Dwyer KR. 1983. The topography, formation and role of the home depression of Collisella scabra (Gould) (Gastropoda: Acmaeidae). Veliger 25, 229–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jones DS, Jacobs DK. 1992. Photosymbiosis in Clinocardium nuttalli: implications for tests of photosymbiosis in fossil molluscs. Palaios 7, 86–95. ( 10.2307/3514798) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Van Veldhuizen RD, Phillips DW. 1978. Prey capture by Pisaster brevispinus (Asteroidea: Echinodermata) on soft substrate. Mar. Biol. 48, 89–97. ( 10.1007/BF00390534) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sloan NA, Robinson SMC. 1983. Winter feeding by asteroids on a subtidal sandbed in British Columbia. Ophelia 22, 125–140. ( 10.1080/00785326.1983.10426591) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Highsmith RC. 1982. Induced settlement and metamorphosis of sand dollar (Dendraster excentricus) larvae in predator-free sites: adult sand dollar beds. Ecology 63, 329–337. ( 10.2307/1938950) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beadle SC. 1991. The biogeography or origin and radiation: dendrasterid sand dollars in the northeastern Pacific. Paleobiology 17, 325–339. ( 10.1017/S009483730001068X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eiting TP, Smith GR. 2007. Miocene salmon (Oncorhynchus) from western North America: gill raker evolution correlated with plankton productivity in the eastern Pacific. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 249, 412–424. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.02.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mayr G, Goedert JL. 2016. New Late Eocene and Oligocene remains of the flightless, penguin-like plotopterids (Aves, Plotopteridae) from western Washington State, U.S.A. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 36, e163573. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Smith NA. 2011. Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic analysis of the flightless Mancallinae (Aves, Pan-Alcidae). Zookeys 91, 1–116. ( 10.3897/zookeys.91.709) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smith NA. 2016. Evolution of body mass in the Pan-Alcidae (Aves, Charadriiformes): the effects of combining neontological and paleontological data. Paleobiology 42, 8–26. ( 10.1017/pab.2015.24) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Livezey BC. 1993. Morphology of flightlessness in Chendytes, fossil seaducks (Anatidae: Mergini) of coastal California. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 13, 185–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Livezey BC. 1992. Flightlessness in the Galápagos cormorant (Compsohalieus (Nannopterum) harrisi): heterochrony, giantism and specialization. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 105, 155–224. ( 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1992.tb01229.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yonge CM. 1951. Studies on Pacific coast mollusks. II. Structure and adaptations of rock boring in Platyodon cancellatus (Conrad). Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 55, 401–407. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Adegoke OS. 1967. Earliest Tertiary West American species of Platyodon and Penitella. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 35, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vermeij GJ. 1992. Time of origin and biogeographical history of specialized relationships between northern marine plants and herbivorous molluscs. Evolution 46, 657–664. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02073.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lindberg DR. 1990. Movement patterns of the limpet Lottia asmi (Middendorff): networking in California rocky intertidal communities. Veliger 33, 375–383. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vermeij GJ, Lowell RB, Walters LJ, Marks JA. 1987. Good hosts and their guests: relations between trochid gastropods and the epizoic limpet Crepidula adunca. Nautilus 101, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yonge CM. 1952. Studies on Pacific coast mollusks. V. Structure and adaptation in Entodesma saxicola (Baird) and Mytilimeria nuttallii Conrad, with a discussion on evolution within the family Lyonsiidae (Lamellibranchia). Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 55, 439–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vermeij GJ. 2003. The geography of evolutionary opportunity: hypothesis and two cases in gastropods. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 935–940. ( 10.1093/icb/42.5.935) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gulbin VV, Golikov AN. 1997. A review of the prosobranch family Velutinidae in cold and temperate waters of the northern hemisphere. I. Capulacmaeinae. Ophelia 47, 43–54. ( 10.1080/00785326.1997.10433389) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gulbin VV, Golikov AN. 2001. A review of the prosobranch family Velutinidae of cold and temperate waters of northern hemisphere. V. Onchidiopsinae. Ophelia 54, 119–132. ( 10.1080/00785236.2001.10409460) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Paine RT, Palmer AR. 1978. Sicyases sanguineus: a unique trophic generalist from the Chilean intertidal zone. Copeia 1978, 75–80. ( 10.2307/1443824) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Amson E, de Muizon C, Laurin M, Argot C, de Buffrénil V. 2014. Gradual adaptation of bone structure to aquatic lifestyle in extinct sloths from Peru. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140192 ( 10.1098/rspb.2014.0192) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Amson E, de Muizon C. 2014. A new durophagous phocid (Mammalia: Carnivora) from the Late Neogene of Peru and considerations on monachine seals phylogeny. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 12, 523–548. ( 10.1080/14772019.2013.799610) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.de Muizon C, Domning DP. 2002. The anatomy of Odobenocetops (Delphinoidea, Mammalia), the walrus-like dolphin from the Pliocene of Peru and its palaeobiological implications. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 134, 423–452. ( 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00015.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vermeij GJ. 2001. Innovation and evolution at the edge: origins and fates of gastropods with a labral tooth. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72, 461–508. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2001.tb01333.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Espoz C, Lindberg DR, Simison WB. 2004. Intertidal limpets of Chile and Peru. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 77, 257–283. ( 10.4067/S0716-078X2004000200006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vermeij GJ. 2017. The limpet form in gastropods: evolution, distribution, and implications for the comparative study of history. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 120, 22–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.McLean JR. 1984. Shell reduction and loss in fissurellids: a review of genera and species in the Fissurellidea group. Am. Malacol. Bull. 2, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fulton PTL, Letts B, Shapiro B. 2012. Multiple losses of flight and recent speciation in steamer ducks. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 2339–2346. ( 10.1098/rspb.2011.2599) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Harris SA, da Silva FM, Bolton JJ, Brown AC. 1986. Algal gardens and herbivory in a scavenging sandy-beach nassariid whelk. Malacologia 27, 299–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mmonwa KL, Teske PR, McQuaid CD, Barker NP. 2017. Evolution of foraging behaviour: deep intra-generic genetic divergence between territorial and non-territorial southern African patellid limpets. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 117, 95–101. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.05.024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Clements KD, Alfaro ME, Fessler JL, Westneat MW. 2004. Relationships of the temperate Australasian labrid fish tribe Odacini (Perciformes; Teleostei). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32, 575–587. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.02.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Darragh TA. 1991. A revision of the Australian genus Tylospira Harris, 1897 (Gastropoda: Struthiolariidae). Alcheringa 15, 151–175. ( 10.1080/03115519108619015) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tillier S, Ponder WF. 1992. New species of Smeagol from Australia and New Zealand, with a discussion of the affinities of the genus (Gastropoda: Pulmonata). J. Molluscan Stud. 58, 135–155. ( 10.1093/mollus/58.2.135) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Enstipp R, Descamps S, Fort J, Grémillet D. 2018. Almost like a whale—first evidence of suction feeding in a seabird. J. Exp. Biol. 221, jeb182170 ( 10.1242/jeb.182170) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Smith NA, Clarke JA. 2015. Systematics and evolution of the Pan-Alcidae (Aves, Charadriiformes). J. Avian Biol. 46, 125–140. ( 10.1111/jav.00487) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cairns DK, Gaston AJ, Huettmann F. 2008. Endothermy, ectothermy and the global structure of marine vertebrate communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 356, 239–250. ( 10.3354/meps07286) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bom RA, de Fouw J, Klaassen RHG, Piersma T, Lavaleye MSS, Ens BJ, Oudman T, van Gils JA. 2018. Food web consequences of an evolutionary arms race: molluscs subject to crab predation on intertidal mudflats in Oman are unavailable to shorebirds. J. Biogeogr. 45, 342–354. ( 10.1111/jbi.13123) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rothman MC, Mattio L, Person RJ, Bolton JJ. 2017. A phylogeographic investigation of the kelp genus Laminaria (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae), with emphasis on the South Atlantic Ocean. J. Phycol. 53, 778–789. ( 10.1111/jpy.12544) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kensley BF. 1985. The faunal deposits of a Late Pleistocene raised beach at Milnerton, Cape Province, South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 95, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vermeij GJ. 2013. On escalation. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 41, 1–19. ( 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124123) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are in the paper.


Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES