Skip to main content
Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
. 2018 Nov 1;27(4):245–251.

Pediatric Referrals for Urgent Psychiatric Consultation: Clinical Characteristics, Diagnoses and Outcome of 4 to 12 Year Old Children

Jennifer Pikard 1,, Nasreen Roberts 1, Dianne Groll 1
PMCID: PMC6254263  PMID: 30487940

Abstract

Objectives

1) To describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of children referred for urgent psychiatric consultation to a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Urgent Consult Clinic (CAMHUCC); and, 2) To study the association between referral source, clinical characteristics, and post assessment outcome.

Method

This is a 12-month retrospective cohort study of children aged 4 to 12-years referred to a CAMHUCC. The clinic’s electronic data base contains demographic and clinical information including reason for referral, diagnosis, and consult outcome. Study data were extracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

The study sample consisted of 120 children, 41.5% male, average age 9.03 years (SD=2.2). Fifty-percent were referred by Children’s Mental Health Agencies (CMHA) and 31.7% by Emergency Departments. The most frequent reason for referral was aggression (64.1%). Most common diagnoses were externalizing disorders (76.7%). Thirty-percent had an identified learning disorder, 80% were referred back to the community and 14.2% were referred to outpatient clinic. There was a significant association between referral from an Emergency Department and female gender (p=0.048) and brief follow-up with CAMHUCC (p=0.006).

Conclusion

Regardless of source of referral, the most common reason for urgent psychiatric referral was aggression and the majority of individuals did not require inpatient psychiatric care. Collaborative multiagency education in child and adolescent mental health disorders, including the role of learning disabilities in externalizing behaviors, may improve the capacity of CMHA and schools to identify and provide focused interventions that may, in turn, reduce behavioral crisis and visits to Emergency Departments and urgent clinics.

Keywords: pediatric, emergency, children, psychiatry, urgent consult

Introduction

Current epidemiological information reports the worldwide prevalence of child and adolescent mental health disorders as approximately 20% (WHO, 2003). In Canada and the USA, 15% - 20% of children/adolescents have a mental disorder, yet only 1/5 receive adequate mental health services (Kirby & Keon, 2006; Government of Canada, 2006; US Department of Health and Human Services, 2001). Over the last decade, Canada and the USA have seen a significant increase in presentation of children/adolescents with mental health problems to Emergency Departments (ED) (Newton, Ali, Johnson, & Haines, 2009; Simon & Schoendorf, 2014; Sheridan, Johnson, Fu, Spiro, & Hansen, 2017). Pediatric Emergency Departments (PED) report that at least 5% of all presentations are for mental health problems (Edelsohn, Braitman, & Rabinovich, 2003; Chun, Katz, & Duffy, 2013; Newton et al., 2009). Approximately 20 – 25% of the mental health presentations are for children less than 12 years of age brought to the ED by parents seeking help for behavior problems (Sheridan et al., 2015).

PEDs have become the primary portal for access to children’s mental health services (Cloutier et al., 2010) and pediatricians identify a lack of training and confidence in dealing with this population (Fremont, Nastasi, Newman, & Roisen, 2008; Soto et al., 2009). Although there are few studies specific to children, it has been hypothesized that the increased use of the PED might be due to an increase in non-urgent presentations, as opposed to a higher prevalence rates of mental health disorders (Fremont et al., 2008; Soto et al., 2009).

A Canadian study of children and adolescents referred for psychiatric urgent consultation showed that males outnumbered females (63% vs 37%), the most common diagnosis was adjustment disorder (29%), and majority of patients did not need ongoing psychiatric care (66.9%) (Lee & Korczak, 2010). Results of a large retrospective study of a PED showed that one third of psychiatric presentations were considered ‘inappropriate’ and concluded that access to urgent child and adolescent psychiatric services in the community may address this problem (Fremont et al., 2008).

A recent Canadian study described trends in utilization of PEDs for mental health concerns. The study reported a 47% increase in the number of mental health presentations and found that return visits represented a significant proportion of all mental health-related visits. There was a reduction in high acuity presentations but an increase in mid-acuity level and an increase in the number of mental health-related visits resulting in admission. The authors highlight the need to reassess the allocation of resources to optimize risk assessment, and follow-up with mental health services at discharge from the PED (Mapelli, Black, & Doan, 2015).

The trend of increasing visits to the ED for non-urgent problems may present significant challenges related to mental health care costs, quality of care, and physical space utilization (Newton et al., 2009; Sheridan et al., 2017). To address this issue there is a need to determine which demographic and clinical characteristics differentiate children who require hospital-based psychiatric services from those who require community based mental health services.

In Canada, most cities and towns have access to Government-funded community-based Children’s Mental Health Agencies (CMHA) that provide self-referral services, including walk-ins, to children, adolescents, and their families, for behavioral, emotional, and family problems. The front-line staff of these agencies may be child and youth workers, bachelors level social workers, and/or behavior therapists. If a case worker is concerned about the possibility of an underlying psychiatric disorder, they access their agency’s contracted child and adolescent psychiatrist for consultation and diagnosis. The staff at CMHA do not make a diagnosis, however they provide a spectrum of behavioral and family assessment and interventions for a variety of low-to-moderate severity behavioral and emotional problems. In addition, the CMHA works in close collaboration with schools to serve the needs of these children in the school system.

In order to bridge the gap between outpatient community services and inpatient care including admissions to emergency departments, an outpatient child and adolescent mental health urgent consult clinic (CAMHUCC) was initiated. The CAMHUCC is situated within a university ambulatory care hospital in Kingston, Ontario and has been funded as a full time multidisciplinary clinic for adolescents 13–17 years of age since 2012 by the South East Local Health Integration Network. The clinic’s assessment team consists of a child and adolescent psychiatrist/psychiatry resident, a social worker, a registered nurse, and a behavioural therapist. The clinic is mandated to provide expedited risk assessment and crisis intervention within 48-hours of referral by the ED/PED. In 2016, the Pediatric Department requested a similar service for children 4–12 years of age who presented in crisis to PED. The clinic applied for and received additional funding for a psychological associate and a behavioural therapist (with a 4-year college diploma in applied behavioral analysis and intervention) for this population. ED physicians, pediatricians, school personnel, primary care physicians, and CMHA counselors were provided with written and verbal information on criteria for use of the CAMHUCC. ED physicians and pediatric clinics use allocated appointments at their discretion. A formal risk assessment protocol was developed with the school boards and CMHA for urgent referrals. This protocol allows mental health leads to fax an urgent referral and contact the clinic directly.

The present study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and service outcome of children referred to the CAMHUCC and identify the characteristics associated with discharge to hospital-based or community-based care.

Method

This is a retrospective cohort study. The sample for this study consisted of children aged 4–12 years old who were assessed by the CAMHUCC from February 2016 to February 2017.

The CAMHUCC gathers patient information at the initial assessment as part of a psychiatric clinical history, and this information is entered into an electronic clinic database by administrative staff. Data collected in the CAMHUCC includes demographic and clinical variables including age, gender, living arrangements, referral source, reason for referral, presenting problem(s), bullying victimization, Individualized Educational Plan (IEP), history of sexual abuse, history of previous treatment(s)/admission, consult diagnosis, consult outcome and family history of psychiatric disorders. The clinic uses Connors Rating Scale and SNAP-IV for ADHD, Child Depression Inventory-2 for Depression and MASC for anxiety disorders. These are completed during the assessment conducted by one of the three child and adolescent psychiatrists who serve CAMHUCC.

Data used in this study was transferred into an excel spreadsheet and uploaded to SPSS v23 for analysis. Patient diagnoses were collapsed into externalizing (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), Conduct Disorder (CD), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and Developmental Disability) and internalizing disorders (anxiety and mood disorders). Descriptive statistics such as means, frequency counts, and percentages were used to describe the study population. Clinical and demographic variables and their association with the various outcomes following the assessment at CAMHUCC, were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Statistical significance was set at the p ≤ 0.05.

Prior to commencement, this research study was reviewed for ethical compliance by the Queen’s University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Board.

Results

During the study period, 527 children and adolescents were assessed by CAMHUCC. Of these, 23% (n=120) were between 4–12 years of age and constitute the sample for this study. The mean age was 9.03 years (SD=2.23) formed the sample for this study. The mean age of the study group was 9.03 years (SD=2.23), and females outnumbered males, and 50% of the referrals were from CMHA. The most common reason for referral was aggression followed by internalizing symptoms. Table 1 presents the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study group.

Table 1.

Study population demographic and clinical information

Population characteristics n=120 %
Gender
 Male 51 42.5
 Female 69 57.5
Living arrangements
 Living with both parents 63 52.5
 Living with one parent/other caregivers 57 47.5
Referral source
 Primary care 22 18.3
 CMHA/school 60 50.0
 Emergency department 38 31.7
Reason for referral
 Aggression 77 64.1
 Suicidal threat 21 17.5
 Anxiety and depression 22 18.3.
Clinical characteristics
 Positive family psychiatric history 107 89.2
 Sexual abuse 6 5.0
 Special education/IEP 37 30.8
 Bullying victimization 22 18.3
 Past mental health intervention/treatment 76 63.3
Clinic assigned diagnosis
 None 10 8.3
 Externalizing disorders 92 76.7
 Internalizing disorder 18 15.0
Outcome following urgent assessment
 Referred to CMHA 51 42.5
 CAMHUCC brief crisis intervention 45 37.5
 Neurodevelopment clinic/mood and anxiety clinic 17 14.2
 Elective admission for diagnostic clarification 7 5.8

Review of gender differences by referral source showed females were significantly more likely to be referred by CMHA (p=0.043) and to be referred for anxiety symptoms (p=0.039). Females were also significantly more likely to have family members with a history of internalizing disorders (p=0.036), and to be discharged with a referral for follow-up in an outpatient psychiatry clinic (p=0.026). Males were significantly more likely to receive brief crisis intervention by the CAMHUCC.

Table 2 presents differences in demographic and clinical characteristics by referral source. PED/ED referrals were statistically significantly older (mean (SD) age 9.84 years (2.11) versus 8.66 years (2.20) p=0.006), than those referred by CMHA or primary care. Referrals from CMHA or school were significantly more likely to be younger (mean (SD) age 8.50 years (2.30) versus 9.57 years (2.06) p=0.009), than other referral sources. There was a significant association between referrals from PED/ED and living with one parent or a caregiver, aggression, suicidal ideation, a history of being bullied, and past mental health treatment. Being female, living with one parent or a caregiver, suicidal ideation, a history of being bullied, and past mental health treatment were all significantly associated with referrals from CMHA or schools.

Table 2.

Differences between demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals by referral source

Population characteristics ED
n=38
CMHA/School
n=60
Primary Care
n=22
Gender
 Male 0.260 0.208
 Female 0.043
Living arrangements
 Living with both parents
 Living with one parent/other caregivers 0.002 <0.001 0.095
Reason for referral
 Aggression 0.028 0.088 0.665
 Suicidal threat 0.001 0.031 0.253
 Anxiety and depression 0.625 1.00 0.557
Clinical characteristics
 Positive family psychiatric history 0.942 0.380 0.296
 Sexual abuse 0.929 0.404 0.236
 Special education/IEP 0.587 0.076 0.102
 Bullying victimization 0.002 0.019 0.530
 Past mental health intervention/treatment 0.045 0.024 0.443
Clinic assigned diagnosis
 None 0.906 0.511 0.479
 Externalizing disorders 0.951 0.667 0.630
 Internalizing disorder 0.870 0.309 0.263
Outcome following urgent assessment
 Referred to CMHA 0.101 0.043 0.521
 Camhucc brief crisis intervention 0.006 <0.001 0.069
Neurodevelopment clinic/mood and anxiety clinic 0.830 0.434 0.442
Elective admission for diagnostic clarification 0.065 0.007 0.198

Table 3 shows the difference between clinical and demographic variables and the post assessment outcomes. Referrals to CMHA were statistically significantly younger (mean (SD) age 8.49 years (2.10) versus 9.49 years (2.28) p=0.012), than those referred to outpatient or provided brief intervention in CAMHUCC. Those who received brief crisis intervention from CAMHUCC were more likely to be younger (mean (SD) age 8.69 years (2.19) versus 9.60 years (2.22) p=0.030). There was no significant age difference between those referred to outpatient psychiatry clinics, (mean (SD) age 8.89 years (2.32) versus 9.88 years (1.41) p=0.117), or those referred to CMHA.

Table 3.

Relationship of clinical and demographic variables to outcomes following urgent assessment

Population characteristics Referred to CMHA
N=51
CAMHUCC Brief Crisis Intervention
N=45
Referral to Clinic
N=17
Elective Admission
N=7
Gender
 Male 0.006 0.112
 Female 0.082 0.026
Living arrangements
 Living with both parents
 Living with one parent/other caregivers 0.235 0.013 0.279 0.303
Referral source
 Primary care 0.521 0.069 0.452 0.198
 Cmha/school 0.043 <0.001 0.434 0.007
 Emergency department 0.101 0.006 0.830 0.065
Reason for referral
 Aggression 0.383 0.732 0.114 0.222
 Suicidal threat 0.157 0.011 0.504 0.211
 Anxiety and depression 0.757 0.039 0.009 0.776
Clinical characteristics
 Positive family psychiatric history 0.143 0.007 0.894 0.763
 Sexual abuse 0.634 0.829 0.858 0.247
 Special education/iep 0.773 0.388 0.891 0.331
 Bullying victimization 0.868 0.716 0.937 0.776
Past mental health intervention/treatment 0.005 0.080 0.910 0.042
Clinic assigned diagnosis
 None 0.013 0.062 0.694 0.413
 Externalizing disorders 0.965 0.120 0.013 0.561
 Internalizing disorder 0.060 0.693 0.001 0.957

As shown in Table 3, individuals referred to CMHA were more likely to have been referred themselves or schools and were significantly associated with past mental health treatment. Those who received brief crisis intervention by the CAMHUCC were more likely to be male, living with one parent or a guardian, referred through the PED/ED, CMHA, or school, presented with suicidal threats or anxiety and depression, and had a positive family psychiatric history. Those referred to an outpatient clinic were more likely to be female, were referred for anxiety or depression, and were given diagnoses of externalizing and internalizing disorders by the CAMHUCC. There were only seven elective admissions for observational assessment and diagnostic clarification, which have not been included in the table above.

Discussion

This twelve-month retrospective cohort study examined the clinical characteristics and consultation outcomes of 4–12 year old children referred to a hospital based urgent psychiatric clinic by PED/ED, primary care, CMHA and school boards. Some results of our study are similar to previous studies. A Canadian study of children and adolescent (mean age 12.2 SD=3.2) reported a higher proportion of males, behavioral problems, and the majority of children assessed did not require ongoing psychiatric care (Lee & Korczak, 2010). Another result which was similar to existing research was that aggression was the most frequent reason for referral for children under 12 years of age. A study of PED presentations reported that children under 12 years of age were frequently brought in by parents and that the PED had become the primary portal for accessing mental health services for non-urgent behavior problems (Sheridan et al., 2015). One explanation for this may be the lack of timely access to community services for these children, or perhaps maybe a pattern of crisis-oriented help seeking by chaotic parents who have their own mental health issues that interfere with coordinating scheduled appointments with the appropriate services.

Our results differed from previous studies is that in our study over three quarters of the children had an externalizing disorder including Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), Conduct Disorder (CD) and Learning Disorders. This is explicable as CMHA workers do not have training to generate diagnosis, and although pediatricians diagnose ADHD and ODD, most patients with complex comorbidities require psychiatrists to assign a diagnosis based on a comprehensive diagnostic assessment which includes biopsychosocial formulation and management plan. It is also noteworthy that almost 2/3 of the children had past contact with some mental health service and were referred after community-based assessment and intervention. These children had significant psychosocial problems and high prevalence of parental psychopathology, which in the case of ADHD is known to have high heritability (Smalley et al., 2000).

A significant finding of our study was the presence of learning disorders in more than a quarter of the study sample. This result is not surprising as previous research has demonstrated an association between learning disorders with aggression and other neurodevelopmental disorders (Mawson, 2012; Pliszka, 2000; Adams, Snowling, Hennessy, & Kind, 1999). Aggression resulting in ED presentation is one manifestation of underlying learning challenges and accompanying frustration. Further, there is strong evidence that childhood-onset of social and behavioral problems and externalizing disorders, are strongly related to adult violence and personality disorders (Soderstrom, Nilson, Sjodin, Carlstedt, & Forsman, 2005; Hofvander, Ossowski, Lundstrom, & Anckarsäter, 2009). As expected, suicidality was evident in a small percentage of children under 12 years of age and frequently a suicidal threat was made during an anger outburst.

The results of our study suggest that a large proportion of children referred from the ED for urgent psychiatric consultation, have underlying learning problems, chaotic family histories including parental mental health problems, parental marital conflict/breakdown, domestic violence and conflictual peer relationships, including bullying and bullying victimization at school.

This study differentiates children who require hospital-based services from those that could be served by CMHA and school-based programs designed to meet the needs of these children and families. CMHA have evidence based behavioral and child management interventions that can serve the needs of these children. Developing collaborative inter-agency, interdisciplinary, integrated approach between mental health professionals, CMHA and educators can assist in developing comprehensive and targeted treatments which include behavioral, academic and mental health interventions and would assist in better triage from least to the most intrusive services. Encouraging the use of CMHA as a first port of call for externalizing behaviors through the development of a central triage system would facilitate better referral practices and timely services for children and families.

This study has a number of limitations including those that are inherent in retrospective studies based on clinical rather than research database. Another limitation is that due to small counts in different diagnoses we collapsed diagnoses into broad groups for example ODD, ADHD, CD into externalizing disorders and anxiety and depression into internalizing disorders. Larger, longitudinal studies are needed to examine outcome of psychiatric consultation, brief intervention, CMHA and school interventions on the early and long-term outcomes of comprehensive interventions (Hendren, Haft, Black, & White, 2018).

Acknowledgements/Conflicts of Interest

The authors wish to acknowledge Nicholas Axas and Leanne Repetti for maintaining the database. The authors have no financial or other conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Adams JW, Snowling MJ, Hennessy SM, Kind P. Problems of behavior, reading and arithmetic: Assessments of comorbidity using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999;69:571–585. doi: 10.1348/000709999157905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chun T, Katz E, Duffy S. Pediatric mental health emergencies and special health care needs. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2013;60(5):1185–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cloutier P, Kennedy A, Maysenhoelder H, Glennie E, Cappelli M, Gray C. Pediatric mental health concerns in the emergency department: Caregiver and you perceptions and expectations. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2010;26(2):99–106. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181cdcae1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edelsohn G, Braitman L, Rabinovich H. Predictors of urgency in a pediatric psychiatric emergency service. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2003;42(10):1197–1202. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200310000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fremont W, Nastasi R, Newman N, Roisen N. Comfort level of pediatricians and family medicine physicians diagnosing and treating child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. International Journal of Psychiatric Medicine. 2008;38(2):153–168. doi: 10.2190/PM.38.2.c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Government of Canada. The human face of mental health and mental illness in Canada. Ottawa, ON: 2006. Catalogue NO. HP5-19/2006E. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hendren RL, Haft SL, Black JM, White NC, Hoeft F. Recognizing psychiatric comorbidity with reading disorders. 2018 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00101. Published online 2018 Mar 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hofvander B, Ossowski D, Lundström S, Anckarsäter H. Continuity of aggressive antisocial behavior from childhood to adulthood: The question of phenotype definition. International Journal of Law Psychiatry. 2009;32(4):224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 May 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirby M, Keon W. Out of the shadows at last: Transforming mental health, mental illness and addiction services in Canada. Ottawa: Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee J, Korczak D. Emergency physician referrals to the pediatric crisis clinic: Reasons for referral, diagnosis and disposition. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2010;19(4):297–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mawson AR. Toward a Theory of Childhood Learning Disorders, Hyperactivity, and Aggression. ISRN Psychiatry 589792. 2012 doi: 10.5402/2012/589792. Published online 2012 Sep 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mapelli E, Black T, Doan Q. Trends in Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization for Mental Health-Related Visits. Journal of Pediatrics. 2015;167(4):905–910. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Newton A, Ali S, Johnson D, Haines C. A 4 year review of pediatric mental health emergencies in Alberta. CJEM. 2009;11(5):447–454. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pliszka SR. Patterns of psychiatric comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2000;9(3):525–540. vii. Review. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sheridan D, Johnson K, Fu R, Spiro D, Hansen M. Impact of an inpatient psychiatric unit on pediatric emergency mental health care. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2017;33(1):1–4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sheridan D, Spiro D, Fu R, Johnson K, Sheridan J, Oue A, …Hansen M. Mental health utilization in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2015;31(8):555–559. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Simon A, Schoendorf K. Emergency department visits for mental health conditions among US children, 2001–2011. Clinical Pediatrics. 2014;53(14):1359–1366. doi: 10.1177/0009922814541806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smalley S, McGough J, del’Homme M, NewDelman J, Gordon E, Kim T. Familial clustering of symptoms and disruptive behaviors in multiplex families with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2000;39(9):1135–1143. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200009000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Soderstrom H, Nilsson T, Sjodin AK, Carlstedt A, Forsman A. The childhood-onset neuropsychiatric background to adulthood psychopathic traits and personality disorders. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2005;46(2):111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Soto EC, Frederickson AM, Tivedi H, Le A, Eugene MC, Shekher M, … Correll U. Frequency and correlates of inappropriate pediatric psychiatric emergency room visits. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2009;70(8):1164–1177. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. US Department of Health and Human Services. Report of the Surgeon General’s Conference on Children’s Mental Health; Washington (DC). 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. World Health Organization. Caring for children and adolescents with mental disorders: Setting WHO directions. 2003. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

RESOURCES