Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2018 Aug 16;7(6):e00818-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00818-18

Complete Genome Sequence of Lytic Oenococcus oeni Bacteriophage OE33PA

Fety Jaomanjaka a, Olivier Claisse a,b, Cécile Philippe a, Claire Le Marrec a,c,
Editor: Frank J Stewartd
PMCID: PMC6256464  PMID: 30533896

Oenococcus oeni is the most common species of lactic acid bacteria associated with malolactic fermentation in wine. Here, we report the genome sequence of the lytic phage OE33PA (vB_OeS_OE33PA).

ABSTRACT

Oenococcus oeni is the most common species of lactic acid bacteria associated with malolactic fermentation in wine. Here, we report the genome sequence of the lytic phage OE33PA (vB_OeS_OE33PA). It has a morphotype similar to that of members of the Siphoviridae family, a linear 39,866-bp double-stranded genome with cohesive ends, and 57 predicted open reading frames.

ANNOUNCEMENT

After alcoholic fermentation, most wines undergo malolactic fermentation (MLF), driven by Oenococcus oeni, to improve their organoleptic properties and microbiological stability (1). Phages infecting O. oeni have been examined, as they could delay MLF (26) and open the way for less-desired indigenous populations to dominate in wines, impairing quality (1, 7). However, so far, no free phage infecting O. oeni has been sequenced, and our current knowledge about phage genomes is derived from the sequencing of prophage loci recognized in prokaryotic genome sequencing projects (8, 9).

Phage OE33PA (vB_OeS_OE33PA) was recently isolated from a red wine using O. oeni host strain IOEBS277 (10). Its apparent obligately lytic lifestyle was intriguing since most oenophages reported to date are temperate (11). Purified DNA was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq technology (Genome-Transcriptome facility of Bordeaux). An average coverage of 3,855× was achieved. Reads were assembled into a single contig using SPAdes 3.10.1 (12), and phage genome ends were determined through closure PCR and Sanger sequencing.

Phage OE33PA has a linear double-stranded DNA genome of 39,866 bp with 13-base-long cohesive ends (CGCACACATTGGA) and a G+C content of 37.29%. Annotation of the open reading frames (ORFs) was performed using Prokka v1.12 (13) with a custom database containing phage sequences from the Swiss-Prot database and refined with the Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology server (14). A total of 57 ORFs were predicted from the genome, and no tRNAs were found. All ORFs translate into proteins ranging in size from 44 to 1,613 amino acids. A total of 49 ORFs are predicted on the forward strand, while the remaining 8 ORFs have a reverse orientation.

Sequence similarity searches were performed with the translation of each predicted ORF against the NCBI protein database using BLASTp (15). Based on homology to known phage proteins, 28 out of 57 ORFs were assigned a predicted function. Although OE33PA cannot lysogenize its host (10), it is predicted to contain a typical lysogeny module, suggesting that a temperate ancestor spontaneously gave rise to the virulent OE33PA mutant. The lysogeny module includes six genes which are all divergently transcribed, of which two encode hypothetical proteins with a short C-terminal (SHOCT) domain (16). The module also encodes a repressor and an integrase which shares 99% identity with that of oenophage Φ10MC (17). However, the 15-bp attP site found directly downstream of the int gene in Φ10MC was not identified in OE33PA (17).

The genome of OE33PA contains functional genes related to replication (helicases, primase), structure proteins (several tail proteins, phage head-tail adaptor protein), packaging (terminase and portal protein), and lysis (lysin and holin). Two extra nonphage genes (morons) downstream of the lysis cassette specify a putative sulfite exporter and a glycosyltransferase.

Data availability.

The phage genome sequence is available at GenBank under the accession no. MH220877.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Support for this project was provided by the French ANR (grant ANR-14-20CE-0007).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lonvaud-Funel A. 1999. Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 76:317–331. doi: 10.1023/A:1002088931106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cazelles O, Gnaegi F. 1982. Enquête sur l'importance pratique du problème des bactériophages dans le vin. Rev Suisse Vit Arb Hort 14:267–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Henick-Kling T, Lee TH, Nicholas DJD. 1986. Inhibition of bacterial growth and malolactic fermentation in wine by bacteriophage. J Appl Bacteriol 61:287–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1986.tb04289.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sozzi T, Gnaegi F, D’Amico N, Hose H. 1982. Difficultés de fermentation malolactique du vin dues à des bactériophages de Leuconostoc oenos. Rev Suisse Vit Arb Hort 14:17–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Philippe C, Jaomanjaka F, Claisse O, Laforgue R, Maupeu J, Petrel M, Le Marrec C. 2017. A survey of oenophages during wine making reveals a novel group with unusual genomic characteristics. Int J Food Microbiol 257:138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Doria F, Napoli C, Costantini A, Berta G, Saiz J-C, Garcia-Moruno E. 2013. Development of a new method for detection and identification of Oenococcus oeni bacteriophages based on endolysin gene sequence and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:4799–4805. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01307-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mills DA, Rawsthorne H, Parker C, Tamir D, Makarova K. 2005. Genomic analysis of Oenococcus oeni PSU-1 and its relevance to winemaking. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:465–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Borneman AR, McCarthy JM, Chambers PJ, Bartowsky EJ. 2012. Comparative analysis of the Oenococcus oeni pan genome reveals genetic diversity in industrially-relevant pathways. BMC Genomics 13:373. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jaomanjaka F, Ballestra P, Dols-Lafargue M, Le Marrec C. 2013. Expanding the diversity of oenococcal bacteriophages: insights into a novel group based on the integrase sequence. Int J Food Microbiol 166:331–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jaomanjaka F, Claisse O, Blanche-Barbat M, Petrel M, Ballestra P, Le Marrec C. 2016. Characterization of a new virulent phage infecting the lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni. Food Microbiol 54:167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2015.09.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kot W, Neve H, Heller KJ, Vogensen FK. 2014. Bacteriophages of Leuconostoc, Oenococcus, and Weissella. Front Microbiol 28:186. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eberhardt RY, Bartholdson SJ, Punta M, Bateman A. 2013. The SHOCT domain: a widespread domain under-represented in model organisms. PLoS One 10:e0129996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gindreau E, Torlois S, Lonvaud-Funel A. 1997. Identification and sequence analysis of the region encoding the site-specific integration system from Leuconostoc oenos (Oenococcus oeni) temperate bacteriophage phi 10MC. FEMS Microbiol Lett 147:279–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10254.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The phage genome sequence is available at GenBank under the accession no. MH220877.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES