Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2018 Nov 8;7(18):e01357-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01357-18

Draft Genome Sequences of the Type Strains of Three Clavibacter Subspecies and Atypical Peach-Colored Strains Isolated from Tomato

Ebrahim Osdaghi a, Perrine Portier b,c, Martial Briand b, Géraldine Taghouti b,c, Marie-Agnes Jacques b,
Editor: Frank J Stewartd
PMCID: PMC6256548  PMID: 30533783

Here, we present the draft genome sequences of 10 Clavibacter sp. strains, including the type strains of different subspecies of Clavibacter michiganensis and a potentially novel species within the genus.

ABSTRACT

Here, we present the draft genome sequences of 10 Clavibacter sp. strains, including the type strains of different subspecies of Clavibacter michiganensis and a potentially novel species within the genus. Genome lengths of the strains varied between 2,982,864 and 3,288,331 bp, with G+C contents of 72.23 to 73.50%.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Clavibacter (Microbacteriaceae) comprises Gram-positive actinobacteria, most of which are pathogenic on agriculturally important crops (1). Traditionally, the genus Clavibacter has been considered to include only one species, Clavibacter michiganensis, comprising five plant-pathogenic subspecies, i.e., C. michiganensis subsp. insidiosus, C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, C. michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis, C. michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus, and C. michiganensis subsp. tessellarius (2). Recently, plant-associated but nonpathogenic members of C. michiganensis were assigned to new subspecies, including C. michiganensis subsp. californiensis and C. michiganensis subsp. chilensis (3). Additionally, C. michiganensis subsp. phaseoli and C. michiganensis subsp. capsici were identified as the causal agents of bacterial bean leaf yellowing and bacterial canker of pepper, respectively (4, 5). On the other hand, peach color-pigmented nonpathogenic Clavibacter sp. strains were isolated from tomato phyllosphere and remain to be taxonomically evaluated (6, 7).

Recently, a reclassification of C. michiganensis members into two new species and three new combinations was proposed (8). However, due to the lack of genomic information from every newly identified subspecies, further investigations are warranted to clarify the taxonomy of Clavibacter spp. Here, we present the draft genome sequences of 10 Clavibacter species strains (Table 1), including the type strains of C. michiganensis subsp. californiensis (CFBP 8216), C. michiganensis subsp. chilensis (CFBP 8217), and C. michiganensis subsp. phaseoli (CFBP 8627), as well as the atypical peach-colored strains (CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616) isolated from tomato in Iran (6, 7). The strains CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616 resulted from the screening of microbial communities associated with tomato plants at Shiraz University in Iran (7, 9) and were isolated from asymptomatic tomato leaves on yeast extract-peptone-glucose agar (YPGA) medium as previously described (6), whereas the remaining eight strains were provided by CIRM-CFBP in France (2).

TABLE 1.

Source, place, and date of isolation, as well as genome information, for each Clavibacter species strain used in this study

Nomenclature CIRM-CFBPa
code
Host of isolation Yr of
isolation
Country of
isolation
Genome information
Accession no.
Reference
or source
G+C
content (%)
Genome
length (bp)
No. of
contigs
Sequencing
coverage (×)
No. of
protein-
coding
genes
No. of
RNA
genes
No. of
pseudogenes
DDBJ/ENA/
GenBank
Sequence Read Archive
Run Expt
Clavibacter michiganensis
subsp. insidiosus
CFBP 1195 Medicago sativa 1964 United Kingdom 72.84 3,203,470 805 450 3,333 52 199 QWDZ01000000 SRR7977544 SRX4810326 16
Clavibacter michiganensis
subsp. insidiosus
CFBP 6488 Medicago sativa 1998 Czech Republic 72.23 3,225,729 1,892 435 3,890 52 329 QWEA01000000 SRR7977605 SRX4810381 2
Clavibacter michiganensis CFBP 7491 Solanum lycopersicum NDb ND 73.02 3,288,331 921 475 3,560 51 122 QWEB01000000 SRR7977581 SRX4810357 This study
Clavibacter michiganensis CFBP 7493 Solanum lycopersicum ND ND 72.91 3,275,884 782 570 3,487 51 91 QWEC01000000 SRR7977687 SRX4810463 This study
Clavibacter michiganensis
subsp. nebraskensis
CFBP 7577 Zea mays ND ND 72.75 2,982,864 1,273 510 3,291 53 373 QWED01000000 SRR7977688 SRX4810464 2
Clavibacter michiganensis
subsp. californiensis
CFBP 8216T Solanum lycopersicum 2000 United States
(Hawaii)
72.71 3,193,415 811 515 3,367 51 105 QWEE01000000 SRR7983517 SRX4814786 3
Clavibacter michiganensis
subsp. chilensis
CFBP 8217T Solanum lycopersicum 2007 Netherlands 73.50 3,044,807 1,002 450 3,356 54 114 QWGS01000000 SRR7983516 SRX4814785 3
Clavibacter spp. CFBP 8615 Solanum lycopersicum 2015 Iran 73.23 3,129,097 620 580 3,236 50 78 QWGT01000000 SRR7983538 SRX4814807 6
CFBP 8616 Solanum lycopersicum 2015 Iran 73.15 3,094,686 961 555 3,342 50 151 QWGU01000000 SRR7983541 SRX4814809 6
Clavibacter michiganensis
subsp. phaseoli
CFBP 8627T Phaseolus vulgaris 2009 Spain 73.46 3,052,098 1,009 460 3,289 53 205 QWGV01000000 SRR7983540 SRX4814808 4
a

CIRM-CFBP, International Center for Microbial Resources—French Collection of Plant-Associated Bacteria, IRHS UMR 1345 INRA-ACO-UA, Beaucouzé, France (https://www6.inra.fr/cirm_eng/CFBP-Plant-Associated-Bacteria).

b

ND, not determined.

The Clavibacter sp. strains (Table 1) were grown on YPGA medium as previously described (2), and DNAs were extracted using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison WI). The DNAs were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq X platform at BGI Tech Solutions (Hong Kong), and the shotgun sequencing yielded 150-bp paired-end reads. A combination of Velvet (v 1.2.10), SOAPdenovo (v 2.04), and SOAPGapCloser (v 1.12) platforms (10, 11) was used for genome assembly. The genomes were assembled using the same strategy and the default settings of the platforms. In brief, different values of kmers were tested to obtain a preassembly with SOAPdenovo. Then, the resulting preassemblies were treated as long reads and introduced in Velvet to obtain final assemblies. Libraries were prepared using 170 to 800 bp. For each strain, genome length (bp) and G+C content (%) are summarized in Table 1. Additionally, genome annotation was performed using the GeneMarkS+ (v 4.6) suite implemented in the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline with default settings (12). Total numbers of protein-coding genes, RNA genes, and pseudogenes were determined for all the genomes, as shown in Table 1.

Average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis using the JSpeciesWS Web server (13) showed that the atypical peach-colored strains CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616 have only 89.00 to 93.00% sequence identity with the type strains of previously identified and/or newly introduced Clavibacter species/subspecies. These ANI values are far below the accepted threshold (95 to 96%) for the definition of prokaryotic species (14), suggesting that the strains CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616 could be defined as a new species. A comprehensive multiphasic taxonomic study using the genome sequences provided in this study to reevaluate the taxonomy of Clavibacter spp. and clarify the position of the strains CFBP 8615 and CFBP 8616 within the genus is ongoing.

Data availability.

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers shown in Table 1. For all sequences, the first versions of the accession numbers are described in this paper. The raw reads of the sequences of all strains were submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (15), and the corresponding accession numbers are shown in Table 1. All of the strains listed in Table 1 are available at CIRM-CFBP, the French Collection of Plant-Associated Bacteria (http://www6.inra.fr/cirm_eng/CFBP-Plant-Associated-Bacteria).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Cécile Dutrieux and Audrey Lathus for strain preservation and supply, the French Network on Xanthomonads (FNX) (https://www.reseau-xantho.org/) for recurrent scientific exchanges, and CATI BBRIC for bioinformatics facilities. We benefited from interactions promoted by COST Action CA16107 EuroXanth (https://euroxanth.eu/).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Davis MJ, Gillaspie AG, Vidaver AK, Harris RW. 1984. Clavibacter: a new genus containing some phytopathogenic coryneform bacteria, including Clavibacter xyli subsp. xyli sp. nov, subsp. nov. and Clavibacter xyli subsp. cynodontis subsp. nov., pathogens that cause ratoon stunting disease of sugarcane and bermudagrass stunting disease. Int J Syst Bacteriol 34:107–117. doi: 10.1099/00207713-34-2-107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jacques MA, Durand K, Orgeur G, Balidas S, Fricot C, Bonneau S, Quillévéré A, Audusseau C, Olivier V, Grimault V, Mathis R. 2012. Phylogenetic analysis and polyphasic characterization of Clavibacter michiganensis strains isolated from tomato seeds reveal that non-pathogenic strains are distinct from C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:8388–8402. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02158-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yasuhara-Bell J, Alvarez AM. 2015. Seed-associated subspecies of the genus Clavibacter are clearly distinguishable from Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:811–826. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gonzalez AJ, Trapiell E. 2014. Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. phaseoli subsp. nov., pathogenic in bean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:1752–1755. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.058099-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oh E-J, Bae C, Lee H-B, Hwang IS, Lee H-I, Yea MC, Yim K-O, Lee S, Heu S, Cha J-S, Oh C-S. 2016. Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. capsici subsp. nov., causing bacterial canker disease in pepper. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:4065–4070. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Osdaghi E, Ansari M, Taghavi SM, Zarei S, Koebnik R, Lamichhane JR. 2018. Pathogenicity and phylogenetic analysis of Clavibacter michiganensis strains associated with tomato plants in Iran. Plant Pathol 67:957–970. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Osdaghi E, Taghavi SM, Hamzehzarghani H, Fazliarab A, Harveson RM, Tegli S, Lamichhane JR. 2018. Epiphytic Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens strains isolated from symptomless solanaceous vegetables are pathogenic on leguminous but not on solanaceous plants. Plant Pathol 67:388–398. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12730. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li X, Tambong J, Yuan KX, Chen W, Xu H, Lévesque CA, De Boer SH. 2018. Re-classification of Clavibacter michiganensis subspecies on the basis of whole-genome and multi-locus sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:234–240. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Osdaghi E, Taghavi SM, Hamzehzarghani H, Fazliarab A, Lamichhane JR. 2017. Monitoring the occurrence of tomato bacterial spot and range of the causal agent Xanthomonas perforans in Iran. Plant Pathol 66:990–1002. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, Tang J, Wu G, Zhang H, Shi Y, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han C, Cheung DW, Yiu SM, Peng S, Xiaoqian Z, Liu G, Liao X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang J, Lam TW, Wang J. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory- efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1:18. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Borodovsky M, Lomsadze A. 2014. Gene identification in prokaryotic genomes, phages, metagenomes, and EST sequences with GeneMarkS suite. Curr Protoc Microbiol 32. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc01e07s32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a Web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. 2014. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:346–351. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kodama Y, Shumway M, Leinonen R. 2012. The Sequence Read Archive: explosive growth of sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D54–D56. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dye DW, Kemp WJ. 1977. A taxonomic study of plant pathogenic Corynebacterium species. N Z J Agric Res 20:563–582. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1977.10427375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers shown in Table 1. For all sequences, the first versions of the accession numbers are described in this paper. The raw reads of the sequences of all strains were submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (15), and the corresponding accession numbers are shown in Table 1. All of the strains listed in Table 1 are available at CIRM-CFBP, the French Collection of Plant-Associated Bacteria (http://www6.inra.fr/cirm_eng/CFBP-Plant-Associated-Bacteria).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES