Sinorhizobium phage ΦM6 infects the nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. ΦM6 most closely resembles marine phages, such as Puniceispirillum phage HMO-2011, rather than previously sequenced rhizobial phages.
ABSTRACT
Sinorhizobium phage ΦM6 infects the nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. ΦM6 most closely resembles marine phages, such as Puniceispirillum phage HMO-2011, rather than previously sequenced rhizobial phages. The 68,176-bp genome is predicted to encode 121 open reading frames, only 10 of which have similarity to those of otherwise-unrelated Sinorhizobium phages.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Despite the gains of the genomics era, there are still large gaps in our knowledge of the microbiomes of soils (1). Data are limited on the diversity of bacteriophages that prey upon nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria, which are among the most important microbes in agriculture. Our lack of knowledge of rhizobial phages also limits our understanding of the effects of phage predation on rhizobial survival both in soil and in crop bioinoculants (2–4). ΦM6 is a bacteriophage from a historical collection (2) and infects Sinorhizobium meliloti SU47, a nitrogen-fixing symbiont of Medicago truncatula (barrel medic), and Medicago sativa (alfalfa) (5, 6). Infection of S. meliloti by ΦM6 is dependent on both lipopolysaccharide (7) and the outer membrane protein RopA1 (8). On the S. meliloti SU47-derived laboratory strain S. meliloti 1021 (9), ΦM6 forms very small plaques. It does not fully lyse Sm1021 cultures, reaching titers of only 0.5 × 106 to 3.0 × 106 PFU/ml. ΦM6 DNA was prepared by phenol-chloroform extraction and was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform, as described previously (10). Genome assembly was performed with Lasergene SeqMan Pro version 11.2.1.25 (DNAStar, Madison, WI) from 500,000 MiSeq 2 × 300-bp reads for each of two plaque isolates (plaque isolate sequences were identical), with default read quality control parameters. PhageTerm (11) predicts a 68,176-bp terminally redundant genome with an initiating cleavage predicted at a pac site, set as position 1 in the genome. The ΦM6 genome has 42.9% G+C content with no predicted tRNAs (12). ΦM6 has 19 regions of homology with its closest relative, the marine podovirus Puniceispirillum phage HMO-2011 (comprising 4% of the genome [13], aligned with the Mauve plugin [14] in Geneious version 10 [15]). ΦM6 is also similar to several uncultured marine viruses (16). The prediction of 121 open reading frames (ORFs) was performed with GeneMark.hmm (17) and RAST (18). Functions are predicted for 22% of these ORFs (19, 20). The terminase large subunit, portal protein, major capsid protein, and proximal tail proteins are most similar to those of HMO-2011 (13). Because the type of terminase large subunit is often predictive of the type of DNA termini possessed by a phage (21), we determined that the ΦM6 terminase large subunit is a member of terminase superfamily 6 and is 28% identical to that of Escherichia phage HK639. The HK639 genome is circularly permuted with terminal redundancy (21, 22), which is consistent with the ΦM6 termini predicted by PhageTerm. Similar to Pseudomonas phage PA11 (23) and Pseudoalteromonas phage ΦRIO-1 (24), ΦM6 has a genome segment containing 7 ORFs predicted to be involved in the synthesis of peptide bonds (25). This phage module has been proposed to be involved in the modification of host peptidoglycan (24, 25). Although ΦM6 is otherwise unrelated to the rhizobium-infecting myovirus phages ΦM12 (26) and ΦM9 (10), it has 7 ORFs with similarity to those of the ΦM12/N3 genus and 2 with similarity to those of ΦM9. ORF SmphiM6_19 is 32% identical to a predicted tail fiber ORF of ΦM12 (phiM12_124), suggesting that genes encoding host-binding tail fiber proteins may have been shuttled between these phages.
Data availability.
The genome sequence of Sinorhizobium phage ΦM6 is available in GenBank under accession number MH700630. The fastq files containing the 2 × 300-bp paired-end Illumina MiSeq reads are available from GenBank under Sequence Read Archive (SRA) numbers SRR7788541 for plaque isolate phiM6.1 and SRR7788540 for plaque isolate phiM6.2.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2014-67013-21579 to K.M.J.
REFERENCES
- 1.Fierer N. 2017. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:579–590. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Finan TM, Hartweig E, LeMieux K, Bergman K, Walker GC, Signer ER. 1984. General transduction in Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol 159:120–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hashem FM, Angle JS. 1990. Rhizobiophage effects on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and yield of field-grown soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.). Biol Fertil Soils 9:330–334. doi: 10.1007/BF00634110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Halmillawewa AP, Restrepo-Cordoba M, Yost CK, Hynes MF. 2015. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of Rhizobium gallicum phage vB_RglS_P106B. Microbiology 161:611–620. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones KM, Kobayashi H, Davies BW, Taga ME, Walker GC. 2007. How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium-Medicago model. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:619–633. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oldroyd GE, Murray JD, Poole PS, Downie JA. 2011. The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis. Annu Rev Genet 45:119–144. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Campbell GR, Reuhs BL, Walker GC. 2002. Chronic intracellular infection of alfalfa nodules by Sinorhizobium meliloti requires correct lipopolysaccharide core. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3938–3943. doi: 10.1073/pnas.062425699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crook MB, Draper AL, Guillory RJ, Griffitts JS. 2013. The Sinorhizobium meliloti essential porin RopA1 is a target for numerous bacteriophages. J Bacteriol 195:3663–3671. doi: 10.1128/JB.00480-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meade HM, Long SR, Ruvkun GB, Brown SE, Ausubel FM. 1982. Physical and genetic characterization of symbiotic and auxotrophic mutants of Rhizobium meliloti induced by transposon Tn5 mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 149:114–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Johnson MC, Tatum KB, Lynn JS, Brewer TE, Lu S, Washburn BK, Stroupe ME, Jones KM. 2015. Sinorhizobium meliloti phage ΦM9 defines a new group of T4 superfamily phages with unusual genomic features but a common T=16 capsid. J Virol 89:10945–10958. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01353-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier LC, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kang I, Oh HM, Kang D, Cho JC. 2013. Genome of a SAR116 bacteriophage shows the prevalence of this phage type in the oceans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:12343–12348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219930110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martinez-Hernandez F, Fornas O, Gomez ML, Bolduc B, de la Cruz Pena MJ, Martinez JM, Anton J, Gasol JM, Rosselli R, Rodriguez-Valera F, Sullivan MB, Acinas SG, Martinez-Garcia M. 2017. Single-virus genomics reveals hidden cosmopolitan and abundant viruses. Nat Commun 8:15892. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. 1998. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1107–1115. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.4.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia FF, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Grose JH, Casjens SR. 2014. Understanding the enormous diversity of bacteriophages: the tailed phages that infect the bacterial family Enterobacteriaceae. Virology 468-470:421–443. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.08.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.King RA, Wright AA, Miles CN. 2011. Data from “Escherichia phage HK639, complete genome.” GenBank https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_016158 (accession number NC_016158). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kwan T, Liu J, DuBow M, Gros P, Pelletier J. 2006. Comparative genomic analysis of 18 Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophages. J Bacteriol 188:1184–1187. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.3.1184-1187.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hardies SC, Hwang YJ, Hwang CY, Jang GI, Cho BC. 2013. Morphology, physiological characteristics, and complete sequence of marine bacteriophage ΦRIO-1 infecting Pseudoalteromonas marina. J Virol 87:9189–9198. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01521-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Iyer LM, Abhiman S, Burroughs AM, Aravind L. 2009. Amidoligases with ATP-grasp, glutamine synthetase-like and acetyltransferase-like domains: synthesis of novel metabolites and peptide modifications of proteins. Mol Biosyst 5:1636–1660. doi: 10.1039/b917682a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brewer TE, Elizabeth Stroupe M, Jones KM. 2014. The genome, proteome and phylogenetic analysis of Sinorhizobium meliloti phage ΦM12, the founder of a new group of T4-superfamily phages. Virology 450-451:84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequence of Sinorhizobium phage ΦM6 is available in GenBank under accession number MH700630. The fastq files containing the 2 × 300-bp paired-end Illumina MiSeq reads are available from GenBank under Sequence Read Archive (SRA) numbers SRR7788541 for plaque isolate phiM6.1 and SRR7788540 for plaque isolate phiM6.2.
