Erwinia amylovora is a plant pathogen belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, a family containing many plant and animal pathogens. Herein, we announce nine genome sequences of E. amylovora bacteriophages isolated from infected apple trees along the Wasatch Front in Utah.
ABSTRACT
Erwinia amylovora is a plant pathogen belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, a family containing many plant and animal pathogens. Herein, we announce nine genome sequences of E. amylovora bacteriophages isolated from infected apple trees along the Wasatch Front in Utah.
ANNOUNCEMENT
At an estimated total number of 1031, phages are by far the most abundant biological entity on the planet (1–7). They dramatically influence the evolution of bacteria by their ability to infect and kill their hosts and to transfer genetic material. Erwinia amylovora is a rod-shaped facultative anaerobic member of the Enterobacteriaceae bacterial family, which includes many well-characterized Gram-negative plant and animal pathogens, such as Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella spp. As the causative agent of fire blight, Erwinia amylovora infects members of the Rosaceae plant family, causing diseased areas to appear burnt (8–10). The isolation and characterization of phages that infect E. amylovora may aid in our understanding of these bacteria and provide potential treatment for this devastating agricultural disease. Herein, we announce the genome sequences of nine E. amylovora bacteriophages, vB_EamM_Asesino, vB_EamM_Alexandra, vB_EamM_Bosolaphorus, vB_EamM_Desertfox, vB_EamM_MadMel, vB_EamM_Mortimer, vB_EamP_Pavtok, vB_EamM_SunLIRen, and vB_EamM_Wellington.
Phages were isolated from apple trees along the Wasatch Front in Utah that appeared to harbor fire blight infection. Phages were plaque purified through a minimum of three passages after amplification via enrichment culture (11). All nine phages reported in this announcement infect the Erwinia amylovora ATCC 29780 strain, as indicated by plaque assays, and their characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Genomic DNA was extracted (Phage DNA isolation kit; Norgen Biotek), a library was made using the Illumina TruSeq DNA Nano kit, and sample genomes were sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing (250-bp paired end) and assembled with Geneious (12) version 8.1 using de novo assembly with medium-low sensitivity and various percentages of data. All phages circularized upon assembly and were annotated using DNA Master (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu/computer.htm), giving preference for calls that gave full coding potential coverage.
TABLE 1.
Properties of nine Erwinia amylovora bacteriophage genomes
| Name | GenBank accession no. | SRA accession no. | Total no. of reads |
No. of reads used |
Assembly fold coverage (range [mean]) |
Length (bp) | No. of ORFsa |
No. of tRNAs |
G+C content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vB_EamP_Pavtok | MH426726 | SRX4597602 | 1,301,332 | 386,192 | 492–2,086 (1,069) | 61,401 | 62 | 0 | 36.9 |
| vB_EamM_SunLIRen | MH426725 | SRX4597606 | 1,301,332 | 386,192 | 8,249–42,422 (13,566) | 84,559 | 141 | 22 | 36.3 |
| vB_EamM_Wellington | MH426724 | SRX4597603 | 626,048 | 372,488 | 133–514 (329.7) | 244,950 | 295 | 8 | 50.3 |
| vB_EamM_Asesino | KX397364 | SRX4597609 | 2,222,038 | 1,022,382 | 512–1,378 (1,037.7) | 246,290 | 289 | 12 | 51.2 |
| vB_EamM_Alexandra | MH248138 | SRX4597608 | 381,540 | 200,005 | 63–516 (166.3) | 266,532 | 349 | 0 | 49.8 |
| vB_EamM_Bosolaphorus | MG655267 | SRX4597604 | 778,168 | 326,344 | 83–555 (248.4) | 272,228 | 321 | 1 | 49.4 |
| vB_EamM_Desertfox | MG655268 | SRX4597605 | 1,930,470 | 1,138,933 | 115–612 (352.9) | 272,458 | 320 | 0 | 49.6 |
| vB_EamM_Mortimer | MG655270 | SRX4616109 | 2,581,160 | 287,396 | 47–207 (129.4) | 273,914 | 325 | 1 | 49.5 |
| vB_EamM_MadMel | MG655269 | SRX4597607 | 1,604,720 | 1,443,568 | 567–1,577 (1,213.9) | 275,000 | 321 | 0 | 49.4 |
ORFs, open reading frames based on current annotation.
The nine phages were grouped into five distinct clusters by genomic dot plot and average nucleotide identity analyses, as previously described (11), with the first three groups containing jumbo Myoviridae. The first jumbo group included four myoviruses, vB_EamM_Bosolaphorus, vB_EamM_Desertfox, vB_EamM_MadMel, and vB_EamM_Mortimer, which are similar to previously published Erwinia phage Ea35-70 (13), as well as other phages we have isolated (14). The second group included two jumbo myoviruses, vB_EamM_Asesino and vB_EamM_Wellington, with similarity to the well-characterized Salmonella SPN3US phage (15) and related phages. The third is a single jumbo myovirus, EamM_Alexandra, which has similarity to previously published Erwinia phages EamM_Yoloswag (14) and EamM_Y3 (16). Podovirus vB_EamP_Pavtok and myovirus vB_EamM_SunLIRen are similar to Erwinia phages PEp14 and phiEa21-4 (17), respectively. The three jumbo myovirus groups package DNA by headful packaging (14) based on homology to phage phiKZ terminase (18), and their bp 1 was chosen by alignment to their phage family. PhageTerm (19) was used to determine the packaging strategy of SunLIRen and Pavtok. SunLIRen appeared to have headful packaging, and its bp 1 was assigned based on homology alignment to Erwinia phage phiEa21-4, while the packaging strategy of Pavtok is unknown, and its bp 1 was assigned due to homology to PEp14.
Data availability.
The GenBank and SRA accession numbers for the nine Erwinia bacteriophages are listed in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Science Education Alliance–Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) for phage analysis training. In addition, we thank Ed Wilcox (BYU DNA Sequencing Center) and Michael Standing (BYU Microscopy Lab).
This work was graciously funded by a USDA grant (to D.A.B., University of Arizona) and the Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology and the College of Life Sciences at Brigham Young University, as well as a private donor.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bergh O, Børsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M. 1989. High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments. Nature 340:467–468. doi: 10.1038/340467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wommack KE, Colwell RR. 2000. Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:69–114. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.1.69-114.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brüssow H, Hendrix RW. 2002. Phage genomics: small is beautiful. Cell 108:13–16. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00637-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wilhelm SW, Jeffrey WH, Suttle CA, Mitchell DL. 2002. Estimation of biologically damaging UV levels in marine surface waters with DNA and viral dosimeters. Photochem Photobiol 76:268–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hendrix RW. 2003. Bacteriophage genomics. Curr Opin Microbiol 6:506–511. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hambly E, Suttle CA. 2005. The viriosphere, diversity, and genetic exchange within phage communities. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:444–450. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Suttle CA. 2005. Viruses in the sea. Nature 437:356–361. doi: 10.1038/nature04160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khan MA, Zhao Y, Korban SS. 2012. Molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis and resistance to the bacterial pathogen Erwinia amylovora, causal agent of fire blight disease in rosaceae. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:247–260. doi: 10.1007/s11105-011-0334-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schroth M, Thomson S, Hildebrand D, Moller W. 1974. Epidemiology and control of fire blight. Annu Rev Phytopathol 12:389–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.12.090174.002133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thomson SV. 2000. Epidemiology of fire blight 2, p 9–36. In Vanneste J. (ed), Fire blight: the disease and its causative agent, Erwinia amylovora. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arens DK, Brady TS, Carter JL, Pape JA, Robinson DM, Russell KA, Staley LA, Stettler JM, Tateoka OB, Townsend MH, Whitley KV, Wienclaw TM, Williamson TL, Johnson SM, Grose JH. 2018. Characterization of two related Erwinia myoviruses that are distant relatives of the PhiKZ-like jumbo phages. PLoS One 13:e0200202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yagubi AI, Castle AJ, Kropinski AM, Banks TW, Svircev AM. 2014. Complete genome sequence of Erwinia amylovora bacteriophage vB_EamM_Ea35-70. Genome Announc 2:e00413-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00413-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Esplin IND, Berg JA, Sharma R, Allen RC, Arens DK, Ashcroft CR, Bairett SR, Beatty NJ, Bickmore M, Bloomfield TJ, Brady TS, Bybee RN, Carter JL, Choi MC, Duncan S, Fajardo CP, Foy BB, Fuhriman DA, Gibby PD, Grossarth SE, Harbaugh K, Harris N, Hilton JA, Hurst E, Hyde JR, Ingersoll K, Jacobson CM, James BD, Jarvis TM, Jaen-Anieves D, Jensen GL, Knabe BK, Kruger JL, Merrill BD, Pape JA, Payne Anderson AM, Payne DE, Peck MD, Pollock SV, Putnam MJ, Ransom EK, Ririe DB, Robinson DM, Rogers SL, Russell KA, Schoenhals JE, Shurtleff CA, Simister AR, Smith HG, Stephenson MB, et al. 2017. Genome sequences of 19 novel Erwinia amylovora bacteriophages. Genome Announc 5:e00931-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00931-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee JH, Shin H, Kim H, Ryu S. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella bacteriophage SPN3US. J Virol 85:13470–13471. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06344-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Buttimer C, Born Y, Lucid A, Loessner MJ, Fieseler L, Coffey A. 2018. Erwinia amylovora phage vB_EamM_Y3 represents another lineage of hairy Myoviridae. Res Microbiol 30062–30067. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2018.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lehman SM, Kropinski AM, Castle AJ, Svircev AM. 2009. Complete genome of the broad-host-range Erwinia amylovora phage phiEa21-4 and its relationship to Salmonella phage Felix O1. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2139–2147. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02352-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mesyanzhinov VV, Robben J, Grymonprez B, Kostyuchenko VA, Bourkaltseva MV, Sykilinda NN, Krylov VN, Volckaert G. 2002. The genome of bacteriophage phiKZ of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Mol Biol 317:1–19. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier L-C, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a fast and user-friendly software to determine bacteriophage termini and packaging mode using randomly fragmented NGS data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The GenBank and SRA accession numbers for the nine Erwinia bacteriophages are listed in Table 1.