We report the complete genome sequences of five bacteriophages infecting Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, a member of the marine Roseobacter lineage. The genomic sequences of these five bacteriophages are almost identical and are closely related to members of the Chivirus genus.
ABSTRACT
We report the complete genome sequences of five bacteriophages infecting Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, a member of the marine Roseobacter lineage. The genomic sequences of these five bacteriophages are almost identical and are closely related to members of the Chivirus genus. The genes associated with the lysogenic cycle were also found.
ANNOUNCEMENT
We report here the genomes of five bacteriophages, DSSΦ1, vB_RpoS-V7, vB_RpoS-V11, vB_RpoS-V16, and vB_RpoS-V18, infecting the marine Roseobacter strain Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3, which was the first marine Roseobacter strain with a published complete genome sequence (1). The five bacteriophages were isolated from the Inner Harbor in Baltimore, MD, using a standard plaque assay (2). The electron microscopy observation indicated that they all belong to the Siphoviridae. The genome of DSS3Φ1 was previously sequenced but was not closed (GenBank accession number HQ632855). We resequenced DSS3Φ1 along with four other bacteriophages infecting R. pomeroyi DSS-3 on the Illumina MiSeq platform using the Nextera XT DNA library prep kit and the MiSeq reagent kit version 2. More than 1 million reads per library were generated with an average length of 160 bp. The reads with a high rate of ambiguity, low quality, or short length were discarded. CLC Genomic Workbench version 7.5 was used for assembly with the default settings. Finally, 40 to 109 contigs were acquired with N50 values ranging from 30 kb to 61 kb. Eventually, the complete genomes of five phages were obtained with at least 450× coverage. Genome annotations were done using GeneMarkS version 4.28 and GeneMark.hmm version 3.25 (3) with default settings. tRNA sequences were searched using tRNAscan-SE version 2.0 (4). Predicted protein-coding genes were subjected to a BLAST search (version 2.6.0) against the NCBI nonredundant (NCBI-nr) database, the Conserved Domain Database (CDD), and the Pfam database and then were manually annotated based on the protein product information in GenBank.
The genome size of each of these five roseophages ranges from 59 to 61 kb. The average GC content is 64.0%, nearly identical to that of the host (64.2%). The five bacteriophages contain 82 to 85 predicted genes, only 22 of which were assigned putative functions. Except for vB_RpoS-V16, the genomic sequences of the bacteriophages are almost identical, with 99% nucleotide identities and 99% coverages. The genome of vB_RpoS-V16 shares 97% nucleotide identity over 86% of the genomes of the other four bacteriophages. The major differential regions are located at the end of the genome. The gene encoding the tail tape measure protein of vB_RpoS-V16 is ca. 500 bp shorter than those of the other four phages.
Manual annotation revealed that these five bacteriophages are closely related to the phages within the Chivirus genus. Chivirus is a genus in the Siphoviridae family and contains several phage isolates infecting Escherichia coli (5, 6) and Salmonella (7), Burkholderia (8), and Xylella (9) spp. Members of this genus share an organization similar to that of four major functional modules and have a 15-kb highly divergent left arm of the genome (9). Homolog analysis identified 13 core genes among 5 bacteriophages infecting marine Roseobacter spp. and 12 other chi-like phages.
All of these five bacteriophages contain the integrase gene, which is accompanied by a DNA binding protein and a helix-turn-helix domain-containing protein. These genes constitute an integration-related module located between the head morphogenesis and DNA metabolism modules. The finding of this integration module suggests that these bacteriophages may be able to convert to the lysogenic cycle.
Data availability.
The GenBank accession numbers of the DSSΦ1, vB_RpoS-V7, vB_RpoS-V11, vB_RpoS-V16, and vB_RpoS-V18 genome sequences are KM581061, MH015249, MH015254, MH015258, and MH015252, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Y.Z. was supported by a Chinese Scholar Council scholarship and the Ratcliffe Environmental Entrepreneurs Fellowship Program. Genome resequencing of DSSΦ1 was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant 41576126 (to S.H.).
REFERENCES
- 1.Moran MA, Buchan A, González JM, Heidelberg JF, Whitman WB, Kiene RP, Henriksen JR, King GM, Belas R, Fuqua C, Brinkac L, Lewis M, Johri S, Weaver B, Pai G, Eisen JA, Rahe E, Sheldon WM, Ye W, Miller TR, Carlton J, Rasko DA, Paulsen IT, Ren Q, Daugherty SC, Deboy RT, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Madupu R, Nelson WC, Sullivan SA, Rosovitz MJ, Haft DH, Selengut J, Ward N. 2004. Genome sequence of Silicibacter pomeroyi reveals adaptations to the marine environment. Nature 432:910–913. doi: 10.1038/nature03170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhan Y, Huang S, Voget S, Simon M, Chen F. 2016. A novel Roseobacter phage possesses features of podoviruses, siphoviruses, prophages and gene transfer agents. Sci Rep 6:30372. doi: 10.1038/srep30372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kazaks A, Dislers A, Lipowsky G, Nikolajeva V, Tars K. 2012. Complete genome sequence of the Enterobacter cancerogenus bacteriophage Enc34. J Virol 86:11403–11404. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01954-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee J-H, Shin H, Choi Y, Ryu S. 2013. Complete genome sequence analysis of bacterial-flagellum-targeting bacteriophage chi. Arch Virol 158:2179–2183. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1700-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Switt AIM, Orsi RH, den Bakker HC, Vongkamjan K, Altier C, Wiedmann M. 2013. Genomic characterization provides new insight into Salmonella phage diversity. BMC Genomics 14:481. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lynch KH, Stothard P, Dennis JJ. 2012. Comparative analysis of two phenotypically-similar but genomically-distinct Burkholderia cenocepacia-specific bacteriophages. BMC Genomics 13:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ahern SJ, Das M, Bhowmick TS, Young R, Gonzalez CF. 2014. Characterization of novel virulent broad-host-range phages of Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas. J Bacteriol 196:459–471. doi: 10.1128/JB.01080-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The GenBank accession numbers of the DSSΦ1, vB_RpoS-V7, vB_RpoS-V11, vB_RpoS-V16, and vB_RpoS-V18 genome sequences are KM581061, MH015249, MH015254, MH015258, and MH015252, respectively.