Abstract
A factorial split plot 4 × 3 experiment was designed to examine and characterize the relationship among production of secondary metabolites (total phenolics, TP; total flavonoids, TF), carbohydrate content and photosynthesis of three varieties of the Malaysian medicinal herb Labisia pumila Benth. namely the varieties alata, pumila and lanceolata under CO2 enrichment (1,200 µmol mol-1) combined with four levels of nitrogen fertilization (0, 90, 180 and 270 kg N ha-1). No varietal differences were observed, however, as the levels of nitrogen increased from 0 to 270 kg N ha-1, the production of TP and TF decreased in the order leaves>roots>stems. The production of TP and TF was related to increased total non structural carbohydrate (TNC), where the increase in starch content was larger than that in sugar concentration. Nevertheless, the regression analysis exhibited a higher influence of soluble sugar concentration (r2 = 0.88) than starch on TP and TF biosynthesis. Photosynthesis, on the other hand, displayed a significant negative relationship with TP and TF production (r2 = -0.87). A decrease in photosynthetic rate with increasing secondary metabolites might be due to an increase in the shikimic acid pathway that results in enhanced production of TP and TF. Chlorophyll content exhibited very significant negative relationships with total soluble sugar, starch and total non structural carbohydrate.
Keywords: CO2 enrichment, total phenolics and flavonoids, carbon:nitrogen ratio, photosynthesis nitrogen use efficiency, total soluble sugar and starch profiling, Kacip Fatimah, medicinal herb
1. Introduction
Labisia pumila Benth., popularly known as Kacip Fatimah, is a sub-herbaceous plant with creeping stems from the family Myrsinaceae that is found widespread in Indochina and throughout the Malaysian forest [1]. Traditionally L. pumila has been used by Malay women to induce and facilitate childbirth as well as a post-partum medicine [2]. Stone [3] had categorized three varieties of this herb in Malaysia, namely L. pumila var. alata, L. pumila var. pumila and L. pumila var. lanceolata. Each of the varieties has a different usage. The varieties most universally utilized by the traditional healers are the first two, L. pumila var. alata and L. pumila var pumila. The other uses of this herb are treatment for dysentery, dysmenorrheal, flatulence, and gonorrhea treatments [4].
Recently, it was found that the bioactive compounds of L. pumila consisted of resorcinols, flavonoids and phenolic acid [1,5]. These compounds have been identified as natural antioxidants that may reduce oxidative damage to the human body [6]. The concentration of plant secondary metabolites was found to be influenced by environmental conditions such as light intensity, carbon dioxide levels, temperature, fertilization, biotic and abiotic factors, which can change the concentration of these active constituents [1,7]. Lately, it was found that the enrichment of L. pumila with high levels of CO2 increased the secondary metabolite production (phenolics and flavonoids) of this plant [8]. A similar result was also observed in ginger (Gingiber officianale) [9].
The increase in atmospheric CO2 due to climate change has direct effects on plant secondary metabolites. The effects show a wide range of patterns, either in the amounts of primary and secondary metabolites. Plants produce a wide range of carbon-based secondary metabolites (CBSM) which have important functions such as wound healing, defense against herbivores, control of the rates of plant decomposition and mediation of interaction between plants and soil biota [10]. Among these CBSM the polyphehols derived from the phenylpropanoid pathways such as soluble phenolics and flavonoids are quantitatively the most important, accounting for about 30% of the organic carbon cycling in the terrestrial biosphere [11]. Under optimum CO2 concentration conditions combined with nutrient resource limitation, which restrict growths to a greater extent than photosynthesis, plants showed an increase in the C/N ratios and excess of non-structural carbohydrates [12]. This excess may be then available for the incorporation in CBSM. The carbon nutrient balance (CNB) hypothesis predicts that the availability of excess carbon at a certain nutrient levels leads to the increased production of CBSM metabolites and their precursors [13]. It was also noted that nitrogen fertilization was found to decrease levels of soluble phenolics and condensed tannins in plant tissues [14].
It has been shown that trees grown under elevated CO2 concentrations tend to increase photosynthesis and decrease nitrogen concentration relative to biomass [15]. The increase in plant productivity in response to rising CO2 is largely dictated by photosynthesis, respiration, carbohydrate production and their differential allocation between plant organs and the subsequent incorporation into biomass. For this reason, many studies have investigated the effects of elevated CO2 on plant primary metabolism but relatively few studies have investigated the response of plant CBSM to increasing CO2 and its interaction with nitrogen availability.
The objective of this study was to examine the effects of different nitrogen levels under CO2 enrichment on photosynthesis rate, photosynthesis-nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE), C/N ratio, chlorophyll content, primary (total non structural carbohydrate) and secondary metabolite (flavonoids and phenolics) synthesis in three varieties of L. pumila. The relationships among photosynthesis, carbohydrate, and total phenolics and flavonoids of plants exposed to combined CO2 enrichment and nitrogen levels were also determined.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Total Flavonoids and Phenolics Content and Their Profiling
Nitrogen levels had a significant (P ≤ 0.05) impact on the production of total phenolics and flavonoid production (Table 1). As more nitrogen was invested steadily from 0 to 270 kg N ha-1, less total phenolic and flavonoid was produced. Labisia pumila Benth. partitioning more of their secondary metabolites in the leaves, followed by the roots and then stems.
Table 1.
Nitrogen levels | Plant parts | TF (mg Rutin/g dry weight) | TP (mg Gallic acid/g dry weight) |
---|---|---|---|
A-180 kg N ha-1* | Leaf | 0.317 ± 0.017c | 0.581 ± 0.019d |
Stem | 0.143 ± 0.017d | 0.301 ± 0.017d | |
Root | 0.308 ± 0.015c | 0.296 ± 0.013d | |
0 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 0.803 ± r0.013a | 1.410 ± r0.028a |
Stem | 0.678 ± r0.022a | 1.164 ± r0.029a | |
Root | 0.788 ± r0.013a | 1.222 ± r0.039a | |
90 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 0.515 ± r0.022b | 1.180 ± r0.032b |
Stem | 0.388 ± r0.030b | 0.927 ± r0.037b | |
Root | 0.498 ± r0.022b | 0.983 ± r0.051b | |
180 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 0.480 ± r0.013c | 0.862 ± r0.021c |
Stem | 0.357 ± r0.010c | 0.610 ± r0.025c | |
Root | 0.464 ± r0.015c | 0.666 ± r0.040c | |
270 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 0.212 ± r0.025d | 0.576 ± r0.008d |
Stem | 0.116 ± r0.023d | 0.324 ± r0.011d | |
Root | 0.197 ± r0.026d | 0.380 ± r0.028d |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 15. Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. A = Control at ambient CO2 levels (400 µmol-1 mol-1) and standard Nitrogen fertilization rates (180 kg N ha-1).
The enhancement of total flavonoids and phenolics of L. pumila seedling was higher under elevated CO2 compared to ambient; and when combined with nitrogen at 180 kg ha-1, total flavonoids and phenolics increased by 70% and 170%, respectively. The enhancement of total plant flavonoids and phenolics usually occurred when plant is deficient in nitrogen [16,17]. This improvement in plant secondary metabolites might be due to increased total non structural carbohydrates (TNC), as exhibited by the correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.81) in Table 2, although a higher correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.88) was displayed by total soluble sugar implying that the accumulation of soluble sugar might be more responsible in the up regulation of plant secondary metabolites production. Amin et al. [18] had proposed that the increase in flavonoids content was due to increase in total soluble sugar as observed in onion the increase of in the former by 7% as a result of the latter’s enhancement by 21%.
Table 2.
Characteristics | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Photosynthesis | 1 | |||||||||||
2. PNUE | 0.04 | 1 | ||||||||||
3. Nitrogen | 0.85* | -0.47 | 1 | |||||||||
4. C:N ratio | -0.73* | 0.55 | -0.91** | 1 | ||||||||
5. Chlorophyll a | 0.77** | -0.38 | 0.88** | -0.81** | 1 | |||||||
6. Chlorophyll b | 0.77** | -0.38 | 0.88** | -0.81** | 0.90 | 1 | ||||||
7. T. Chlorophyll | 0.77* | -0.38 | 0.88* | -0.81* | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1 | |||||
8. TSS | -0.69* | 0.43 | -0.83** | 0.81** | -0.88** | -0.88** | -0.88** | 1 | ||||
9. Starch | -0.48 | 0.26 | -0.55** | 0.57** | -0.72** | -0.72** | -0.72** | 0.88* | 1 | |||
10. TNC | -0.58* | 0.34 | -0.69* | 0.69* | -0.81* | -0.81* | -0.81* | 0.96** | 0.98** | 1 | ||
11. Flavonoids | 0.77** | -0.38 | 0.88** | -0.81* | 0.90** | 0.90** | 0.90** | -0.88* | -0.72** | -0.80** | 1 | |
12. Phenolics | 0.77** | -0.38* | 0.88** | -0.81* | 0.90** | 0.90** | 0.90** | -0.88* | -0.72* | -0.81* | 1.00 | 1 |
* and ** respectively significant at P ≤ 0.05 or P ≤ 0.01.
2.2. Total Soluble Sugar, Starch and Total Non Structural Carbohydrate (TNC) and Their Profiling
The accumulation and partitioning of carbohydrates were influenced by the nitrogen levels applied to L. pumila (P ≤ 0.05). The accumulation of carbohydrates in different parts of the plant followed a descending order of leaf>root>stem. As the nitrogen fertilization increased, the concentration of total soluble sugar, starch and TNC decreased (Table 3). The concentration of sucrose and starch registered the lowest values under 270 kg N ha-1, compared to other nitrogen treatments. Under ambient conditions at a standard fertilization rate of 180 kg N ha-1 less sucrose and starch were produced in the leaf, stem and root compared to those plants exposed to high CO2 concentration with the same fertilization level. In all plant parts of L. pumila, the increase in starch content was larger than the increase in sugar concentration [19]. Results thus suggested that the N-fertilization of plant under high CO2 was able to enhance the soluble sugar and starch contents, which had simultaneously enhanced the TNC. Similar observation was found by other researchers [20,21,22,23]. The accumulation of carbohydrate in low nitrogen-fertilized plant might be due to the reduction in sink size of the plant when nitrogen is limited; hence, reducing the translocation of carbohydrates to other plant parts [24]. When sink strength was reduced under low nitrogen fertilization, the extra carbohydrates accumulated in L. pumila plants might be channeled for the production of secondary metabolites (total phenols and flavonoids), thus explaining the reason why the production of secondary metabolites was up-regulated in low nitrogen fertilization. It is possible that when photosynthetic performance is suppressed under insufficient nitrogen supply, recycling of the enzymatic nitrogen required for secondary metabolism may occur resulting in possible increase in secondary metabolites (phenolics and flavonoids) [25].
Table 3.
Nitrogen levels | Plant parts | TSS (mg sucrose /g dry weight) | Starch (mg glucose /g dry weight) | TNC (mg /g dry weight) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A -180 kg N ha-1* | Leaf | 24.06 ±0.51c | 60.11 ± 0.19d | 84.16 ± 2.32c |
Stem | 16.70 ± 1.15d | 23.01 ± 0.27d | 40.14 ± 1.67d | |
Root | 20.21 ± 0.51c | 49. 6 ± 0.33d | 70.21 ± 2.32c | |
0 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 42.71 ± 0.50a | 89.41 ± 0.28a | 131.32 ± 3.21a |
Stem | 32.04 ± 0.84a | 80.16 ± 0.29a | 113.21 ± 1.56a | |
Root | 38.09 ± 0.50a | 78.22 ± 0.49a | 117.34 ± 3.56a | |
90 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 37.45 ± 0.49b | 78.18 ± 0.62b | 116.7 ± 5.77b |
Stem | 22.26 ± 0.44b | 45.27 ± 0.47b | 67.23 ± 6.22b | |
Root | 33.66 ± 0.49b | 67.98 ± 0.51b | 103.21 ± 7.55b | |
180 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 32.64 ± 0.59c | 86.22 ± 0.23c | 118.78 ± 5.67b |
Stem | 15.10 ± 0.99d | 51.03 ± 0.25c | 66.31 ± 6.90c | |
Root | 28.86 ± 0.58c | 66.67 ± 0.44c | 96.75 ± 7.90c | |
270 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 23.80 ± 1.16d | 57.66 ± 0.23d | 82.22 ± 6.89d |
Stem | 8.96 ± 0.70d | 32.42 ± 0.21d | 41.31 ± 8.65d | |
Root | 20.02 ± 1.17d | 48.20 ± 0.28d | 68.31 ± 7.96d |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 15. Means not sharing a single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. A = Control at ambient CO2 levels (400 µmol-1 mol-1) and standard Nitrogen fertilization rates (180 kg N ha-1).
2.3. Photosynthesis and Photosynthesis Nitrogen Use Efficiency (PNUE)
The net assimilation rate (photosynthesis) was influenced by nitrogen levels applied (P ≤ 0.05), however, no varietal differences were observed. Leaf photosynthesis rate increased with increasing nitrogen fertilization in an ascending oder 0 > 90 > 180 > 270 kg N ha-1. The highest photosynthesis was obtained in L. pumila exposed to CO2 enrichment combined with 270 kg N ha-1 (11.75 µmol m-2 s-1) compared to without N fertilization (4.98 11.75 µmol m-2 s-1; Table 4). However, under ambient CO2, plants recorded 6% higher photosynthesis (5.29 µmol m-2 s-1) when fertilized with 180 kg N ha-1 compared to the plant raised under elevated CO2 (4.98 µmol m-2 s-1) but without N fertilization (0 kg N Ha-1). The finding showed the importance N in further enhancing leaf gas exchange of L. pumila plants exposed to CO2 enrichment.
Table 4.
Parameters | *Ambient-180 kg N h-1 | 0 kg N h-1 | 90 kg N h-1 | 180 kg N h-1 | 270 kg N h-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Photosynthesis | 5.29±0.04c | 4.98 ± 0.25a | 7.29 ± 0.26b | 8.46 ± 0.24c | 11.75 ± 0.47d |
PNUE1 | 1.79 ± 0.06c | 3.09 ± 0.18a | 3.01 ± 0.17b | 2.45 ± 0.12c | 2.66 ± 0.12d |
Leaf N content | 2.96 ± 0.10c | 1.63 ± 0.09a | 2.46 ± 0.11b | 3.47 ± 0.09c | 4.42 ± 0.08d |
C:N2 | 12.64 ± 0.65c | 28.15 ± 1.15a | 18.29 ± 0.72b | 13.12 ± 0.42c | 10.29 ± 0.18d |
Chlorophyll a | 5.48 ± 0.06c | 3.60 ± 0.123a | 4.35 ± 0.123b | 5.30 ± 0.05c | 6.16 ± 0.10d |
Chlorophyll b | 16.38 ± 0.15c | 12.30 ± 0.26a | 13.92 ± 0.26b | 15.96 ± 0.11c | 17.85 ± 0.22d |
Chlorophyll a +b | 21.86 ± 0.21c | 15.90 ± 0.39a | 18.21 ± 0.38b | 21.26 ± 0.16c | 24.01 ± 0.33d |
Total soluble sugar | 24.04 ± 0.52c | 42.72 ± 0.50a | 37.45 ± 0.49b | 32.64 ± 0.60c | 23.80 ± 1.17d |
Starch | 58.04 ± 0.52c | 84.05 ± 2.11a | 78.78 ± 2.18b | 72.75 ± 2.41c | 63.91 ± 2.98d |
TNC3 | 82.07 ± 1.03c | 126.77 ± 2.47a | 116.24 ± 2.58b | 105.40 ± 2.93c | 87.71 ± 4.10d |
Total flavonoids | 0.31 ± 0.01c | 0.51 ± 0.01a | 0.47 ± 0.01b | 0.33 ± 0.01c | 0.30 ± 0.01d |
Total phenolics | 1.16 ± 0.21c | 1.43 ± 0.14a | 1.35 ± 0.23b | 1.25 ± 0.32c | 0.71 ± 0.24d |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 15. Means not sharing single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. *Control at ambient CO2 levels (400 µmol-1 mol-1) and standard nitrogen fertilization rate (180 kg N ha-1). 1 = Photosynthesis nitrogen use efficiency (µmol mol-1 N s-1); 2 = carbon to nitrogen ratio; 3 = total non structural carbohydrate (mg g-1).
Plants fertilized with less N levels were inclined to record higher PNUE values. The increase in PNUE signified that the plants were more efficient in utilizing nitrogen due low nitrogen availability [26]. Results of the present study showed that a decrease in photosynthesis could have stimulated the production of plant secondary metabolites, as shown by the negative correlation coefficient (Table 2) between photosynthesis and secondary metabolites (r2 = -0.77) of total phenolics and flavonoids. A possible explanation to this might be that the decrease in photosynthetic rate could have increased the shikimic acid pathway that enhanced the production of plant secondary metabolites, and this is due to increase in the concentration of soluble sugar [27].
2.4. Leaf Nitrogen and Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio (C:N)
The enhancement of N fertilization significantly improved leaf nitrogen content (P ≤ 0.05). As nitrogen levels increased from 0 to 270 kg N ha-1 leaf tissue nitrogen also increased considerably. The increase in leaf tissue nitrogen might result from intensification of nitrate content in the leaf that signified the enhanced nitrate assimilation of plant under elevated CO2 [28]. Simultaneously, the increase in leaf nitrogen content had lead to reduction in plant C:N ratio under high N fertilization. High CO2 treatment combined with the highest nitrogen level (270 kg N ha-1) reduced the C:N ratio (10.29), whilst when combined with 0 kg N ha-1, had increased the C:N ratio (28.15) by 173%. A similar increase in C:N ratio of plants enriched with high CO2 under low nitrogen was also observed by Fonseca et al. [23]. High C:N ratio had a significant positive relationship (P ≤ 0.01) with total flavonoids and phenolics compounds (r2 = 0.81; Table 2) signifying a good direct association between the C:N ratio and plant secondary metabolites. Conversely, the C:N ratio displayed a significant negative relationship with photosynthesis (r2 = -0.71), implying that increase in C:N ratio decreased the photosynthetic capacity of L. pumila. Winger et al. [29] attributed the increase in C:N ratio that had decreased the photosynthetic capacity to increase in carbohydrate accumulation, which repressed photosynthetic protein production, especially the Rubisco. In the present study, the increase in C:N ratio had also reduced the photosynthetic capacity of L. pumila seedlings, and this suggested an enhanced synthesis of plant secondary metabolites, especially the flavonoids and phenolics [30].
2.5. Chlorophyll Content
Chlorophyll content was influenced by the application of Nitrogen (P ≤ 0.01). As the levels of N fertilization increased from 0 to 270 kg N ha-1, chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll a+b were also enhanced. The increase in chlorophyll content with increasing nitrogen has been reported by Suza and Valio [31]. It was found from the correlation (Table 2) that chlorophyll a, b and total were significantly (P ≤ 0.01) and negatively related. Competition between secondary metabolites and chlorophyll content fits well with the prediction of protein competition model (PCM) that the secondary metabolites content is controlled by the competition between protein and secondary metabolites biosynthesis pathway and its metabolites regulation. The negative relationship between the secondary metabolites and chlorophyll is a sign of gradual switch of investment from protein to polyphenols production [32]. The same discovery was also obtained by Michel et al. [33] on flavonoids and chlorophyll content in Arabidopsis, which suggested that the production of secondary metabolites was competing with light harvesting protein when soil nitrogen was low.
3. Experimental
3.1. Experimental Location, Plant Materials and Treatments
The experiments were carried out under a growth house at Ladang 2, Faculty of Agriculture Glasshouse Complex, Universiti Putra Malaysia (longitude 101° 44’ N and latitude 2° 58’S, 68 m above sea level) with a mean atmospheric pressure of 1.013 kPa. Three-month old L. pumila seedlings of var alata, var pumila and var lanceolata were left for a month to acclimatize in a nursery until ready for the treatments. Carbon dioxide enrichment treatment started when the seedlings reached 4 months of age where plants were exposed to 1,200 µmol-1 mol-1 CO2 and fertilized with four levels of nitrogen concentrations viz. 0, 90, 180 and 270 kg N Ha-1. The fertilization with nitrogen levels were split into three applications. A control at ambient CO2 (400 µmol-1 mol-1) with standard N fertilization (180 kg N ha-1) was included to compare plant responses to high CO2 combined with different levels of N. This factorial experiment was arranged in a split plot using a randomized complete block design with nitrogen levels being the main plot, and varieties as the sub-plot replicated three times. Each treatment consisted of ten seedlings.
3.2. Growth House Microclimate and CO2 Enrichment Treatment
The seedlings were raised in specially constructed growth houses receiving 12-h photoperiod and average photosynthetic photon flux density of 300 µmol m-2 s-1. Day and night temperatures were recorded at 30 ± 1.0 °C and 20 ± 1.5 °C, respectively, and relative humidity at about 70% to 80%. Vapor pressure deficit ranged from 1.01 to 2.52 kPa. Carbon dioxide at 99.8% purity was supplied from a high–pressure CO2 cylinder and injected through a pressure regulator into fully sealed 2 m × 3 m growth houses at 2-h daily and applied continuous from 08:00 to 10:00 a.m. [34]. The CO2 concentration at different treatments was measured using Air Sense ™ CO2 sensors designated to each chamber during CO2 exposition period. Plants were watered three to four times a day at 5 min per session to ensure normal growth of plant using drip irrigation with emitter capacity of 2 L hr-1. The experiment lasted for 15 weeks from the onset of treatment.
3.3. Total Phenolics and Total Flavonoid Quantification
The method of extraction and quantification for total phenolics and flavonoids contents followed after Jaafar et al. [8]. An amount of ground tissue sample (0.1 g) was extracted with 80% ethanol (10 mL) on an orbital shaker for 120 minutes at 50 °C. The mixture was subsequently filtered (Whatman™ No.1), and the filtrate was used for the quantification of total phenolics and total flavonoids. Folin – Ciocalteu reagent (diluted 10-fold) was used to determine the total phenolics content of the leaf samples. Two hundred µl of the sample extract was mixed with Follin–Ciocalteau reagent (1.5 mL) and allowed to stand at 22 °C for 5 minutes before adding NaNO3 solution (1.5 mL, 60 g L-1). After two hours at 22 °C, absorbance was measured at 725 nm. The results were expressed as mg g-1 gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE/ g dry sample). For total flavonoids determination, sample (1 mL) was mixed with NaNO3 (0.3 mL) in a test tube covered with aluminium foil, and left for 5 minutes. Then 10% AlCl3 (0.3 mL) was added followed by addition of 1 M NaOH (2 mL) and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm using rutin as a standard (mg rutin/ g dry sample).
3.4. Starch Determination
Starch content was determined spectrophometrically using method by Thayumanavam and Sadasivam [35]. In this method, dry sample (about 0.5 g) was homogenized in hot 10 ml 80% ethanol to remove the sugar. The sample was then centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 minute and then the residue was retained. After that, distilled water (5.0 mL) and 52% perchloric acid (6.5 mL) were added to the residue, then the solution was centrifuged and the supernatant separated and then filtered through no. 5 filter paper (Whatman). The processes were repeated until the supernatant was made up to 100 mL. An aliquot of the supernatant (100 µL) was added to distilled water until the volume became 1 mL. After that, 4 ml anthrone reagent (Sigma, USA; prepared with 95% sulphuric acid by adding 2 g of anthrone to 100 ml 95% sulphuric acid) was added to a tube. The mixed solution was placed in the water bath at 100 °C for eight minutes and then cooled to the temperature room, and then the sample was read at absorbance of 630 nm to determine the sample starch content. Glucose was used as a standard and starch content was expressed as mg glucose equivalent /g dry sample.
3.5. Soluble Carbohydrates
Soluble carbohydrates were measured spectrophotometrically using the method described by Edward [36]. Samples (0.5 g) were placed in 15 mL conical tubes. Then distilled water (10 mL) was added and the mixture was then vortexed and incubated for 10 minutes. Anthrone reagent was prepared using anthrone (0.1 g) that was dissolved in 95% sulphuric acid (50 mL). Sucrose was used as a standard stock solution to prepare a standard curve for the quantification of sucrose in the sample. The mixed sample of ground dry sample and distilled water was centrifuged at a speed of 3,400 rpm for 10 minutes and then filtered to get the supernatant. To an aliquot ( 4 mL) of the sample was added anthrone reagent (8 mL) and the mixture was placed in a waterbath set at 100 °C for 5 minutes before the sample was measured at absorbance 620 nm using UV160U spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan). The soluble sugar in the sample was expresses as mg sucrose/ g dry sample.
3.6. Total Non Structural Carbohydrate (TNC)
The total non structural carbohydrate was calculated as the sum of total soluble sugar and starch content [24].
3.7. Chlorophyll Content
Total chlorophyll content was measured by method from Idso et al. [37] using fresh weight basis. Prior to each destructive harvest each seedling was analyzed for the leaf chlorophyll relative reading (SPAD meter 502, Minolta Inc, USA). The leaves of Labisia pumila with different greenness (yellow, light green and dark green) were selected for analysis and total leaf chlorophyll content was analyzed. For each type of leaf greenness, the relative SPAD value was recorded (five points/leaf) and the same leaves sampled for chlorophyll content determination. Leaf disk 3 mm in diameter was obtained from leaf sample using a hole puncher. For each seedling the measurement was conducted on the youngest fully expanded leaves on each plant, generally the second or third leaf from the tip of the stem was used. The leaf disks were immediately immersed in acetone (20 mL) in an aluminum foil-covered glass bottle for approximately 24 hours at 0 °C until all the green colour had bleached out. Finally, the solution (3.5 mL) was transferred to measure at absorbances of 664 and 647 nm using a spectrometer (UV-3101P, Labomed Inc, USA). After that the least squares regression was used to develop predictive relation between SPAD meter readings and pigment concentrations (mg / g fresh weight) obtained from the chlorophyll destructive analysis.
3.8. Total Carbon, Nitrogen and C:N Ratio
Total carbon and C:N ratio were measured by using a CNS 2000 analyzer (Model A Analyst 300, LECO Inc, USA). This was performed by placing ground leaf sample (0.05 g) into the combustion boat. Successively, the combustion boat was transferred to the loader before the sample was burned at 1,350 °C to obtain the reading of total carbon and nitrogen content of the samples.
3.9. Photosynthesis and Photosynthesis Nitrogen Use Efficiency (PNUE)
The measurement was obtained from a closed infra-red gas analyzer LICOR 6400 Portable Photosynthesis System system (IRGA, Licor Inc. Nebraska, USA). Prior to use, the instrument was warmed for 30 minutes and calibrated with the ZERO IRGA mode. Two steps are required in the calibration process: first, the initial zeroing process for the built-in flow meter; and second, zeroing process for the infra-red gas analyzer. The measurements used optimal conditions set by Jaafar et al. [38] of 400 µmol/mol CO2 30 °C cuvette temperature, 60% relative humidity with air flow rate set at 500 cm3/min, and modified cuvette condition of 800 µmol m-2 s-1 photosynthetically photon flux density (PPFD). The measurements of gas exchange were carried out between 09:00 to 11:00 a.m. using fully expanded young leaves numbered three and four from plant apex to record net photosynthesis rate (A). The operation was automatic and the data were stored in the LI-6400 console and analyzed by “ Photosyn Assistant“ software (Version 3, Lincoln Inc, USA) [38] Several precautions were taken to avoid errors during measurements. Leaf surfaces were cleaned and dried using tissue paper before enclosed in the leaf cuvette. Photosynthesis nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE) was calculated by dividing the photosynthesis to nitrogen content of leaves [39].
3.10. Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using analysis of variance by SAS version 17. Mean separation test between treatments was performed using Duncan multiple range test and standard error of differences between means was calculated with the assumption that data were normally distributed and equally replicated.
4. Conclusions
This study demonstrated that enrichment with high levels of CO2 can enhance the production of plant secondary metabolites, in particular the total phenolics and total flavonoids, in plant. However, increased nitrogen fertilization can reduce the production of these plant secondary metabolites under CO2 enrichment. When there were accumulation of TNC in plant leaves and reduction in photosynthesis, the production of plant secondary metabolites might be up-regulated. The increase in the production of plant secondary metabolites was indicated by increases in the values of C:N ratio, PNUE and reduction in chlorophyll contents.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for financing this work under the Research University Grant Scheme No. 91007.
Footnotes
Samples Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
References and Notes
- 1.Jaafar H.Z.E., Mohamed H.N.B., Rahmat A. Accumulation and partitioning of total phenols in two varieties of Labisia pumila Benth. under manipulation of greenhouse irradiance. Acta Hort. 2008;797:387–392. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Burkill I.H. A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula. 2nd. Government of Malaysia and Singapore Publication; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 1935. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stone B.C. Notes on the genus Labisia Lindyl (Myrsinaceae) Malayan Nat. J. 1988;42:43–51. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rozihawati Z., Aminah H., Lokman N. Malaysia Science and Technology Congress 2003. Agricultural Sciences; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 2003. Preliminary trials on the rooting ability of Labisia pumila cuttings. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jamia A.J., Ibrahim J., Khairana H., Juriyati H. Perkembangan Penyelidikan dan Pembangunan Kacip Fatimah. New Dimension in Complementary Health Care; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 2004. pp. 13–19. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Namiki M. Antioxidant/antimutagens in food, critical reviews of food science and nutrition. Food Sci. Nutr. 1990;29:273–300. doi: 10.1080/10408399009527528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Briskin D.P., Gawienowski M.C. Differential effects of light and nitrogen on the production of hypericins and leaf glands in Hypericum perforatum. Plant Physiol. 2001;39:1075–1081. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jaafar H.Z.E., Ibrahim M.H., Por L.S. Effects of CO2 enrichment on accumulation of total phenols, flavonoid and chlorophyll content in two varieties of Labisia pumila Benth. exposed to different shade levels; Proceedings of International Conference on Balanced Nutrient Management for Tropical Agriculture; Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. 15-22 February 2010; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: UPM; 2010. pp. 112–114. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ali G., Hawa Z.E.J., Asmah R. Elevated carbon dioxide increases contents of flavonoids and phenolics compound, and antioxidant activities in Malaysian Young Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) varieties. Molecules. 2010;15:7907–7922. doi: 10.3390/molecules15117907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nothrup R.R., Dahlgren R.A., McColl J.G. Polyphenols as regulators of plant-–litter–soil interaction: a positive feedback. Biogeochemistry. 1998;42:189–220. doi: 10.1023/A:1005991908504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boudet A.M., Kajita S., Grima-Pattenati J., Goffner D. Lignin and lignocellulosics: a better control of synthesis for new and improved uses. Trends Plant Sci. 2003;8:576–581. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bryant J.P., Chapin F.S., Klein D.R. Carbon nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos. 1983;40:357–368. doi: 10.2307/3544308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reichardt P.B., Chapin F.S., Bryant J.P., Mattes B.R., Clausen T.P. Carbon nutrient balance as a predictor of plant defense in Alaskan balsam poplar: a potential importance of metabolite turnover. Oecologica. 1991;88:401–406. doi: 10.1007/BF00317585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lindroth R.L., Osier T.L., Barnhill H.R.H., Wood S.A. Effects of genotype and nutrient availability on photochemistry of trembling aspen (Populus tremoides Mich.) during leaf senescence. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2002;30:297–307. doi: 10.1016/S0305-1978(01)00088-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Norby R.J., Iverson C.M. Nitrogen uptake, distribution, turnover, and efficiency of use in a CO2 enriched sweetgum forest. Ecology. 2006;87:5–14. doi: 10.1890/04-1950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koricheva J., Larsson S., Haukioja E., Keinanen M. Regulation of woody plant secondary metabolism by resource availability: hypothesis means by meta-analysis. Oikos. 1998;83:212–226. doi: 10.2307/3546833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Felgines C., Texier O., Morand C., Manach C., Scalbert A., Regerat F., Remesy C. Bioavailability of the flavone naringenin and its glycosides in rats. Amer. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2000;279:1148–1154. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2000.279.6.G1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Amin A.A., Rashad M., El-Abagy H.M.H. Physiological effects of indole-3-Butyric-Acid and Salicylic acid on growth, yield and chemical constituents of onion plants. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2007;3:1554–1563. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tissue D.T., Thomas R.B., Strain B.R. Atmospheric CO2 increases growth and photosynthesis of Pinus taedea: a four year field experiment. Plant Cell Environ. 1997;20:1123–1134. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Den-Hertog J., Stulen L., Fonseca E., Delea P. Modulation of carbon and nitrogen allocation in Urtica diocia and Plantago major by elevated CO2: impact of accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates and ontogenic drift. Physiol. Planta. 1996;98:77–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00677.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Poorter H., Berkel V., Baxter R., Den-Hertog J., Dijkstra P., Gifford R.M., Griffin K.L., Roumet C., Roy J., Wong S.C. The effects of elevated CO2 on the chemical composition and construction costs of leaves of 27 C3 species. Plant Cell Environ. 1997;20:472–482. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Baxter R., Ashenden T.W., Farrar J. Effects of elevated CO2 and nutrient status on growth , dry matter partitioning and nutrient content of Poa alpinia var. vivpara L. J. Exp. Bot. 1997;48:1477–1486. doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.7.1477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fonseca F., Bowsher C., Stulen I. Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrate reductase transcription and activity in leaves and roots of Plantago major. Physiol. Planta. 1997;100:940–948. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb00021.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reddy A.R., Reddy K.R., Padjung R., Hodges H.F. Nitrogen nutrition and photosynthesis in leaves of pima cotton. J. Plant Nutr. 1996;19:755–790. doi: 10.1080/01904169609365158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tognetti R., Johnson J.D. The effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and nutrient supply on gas exchange, carbohydrates and foliar phenolics concentration in live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) seedlings. Ann. For. Sci. 1999;56:379–389. doi: 10.1051/forest:19990503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jacob J., Gretiner C., Drake B.G. Acclimation of photosynthesis in relation to rubisco and non structural carbohydrate contents and in situ carboxylase activity in Scirpus olnelyi grown at elevated CO2 in the field. Plant Cell Environ. 1995;18:875–884. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00596.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fan Y., Wang Y., Tan R., Zhang Z. Seasonal and sexual variety of ginko flavonol glycosides in leaves of Gingko biloba L. J. Trad. Chin. Med. 1998;23:267–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Geiger M., Walch-Piu L., Harnecker J., Schulze E.D., Stitt M. Enhanced CO2 leads to a modified diurnal rhythm of nitrate reductase activity in older plants and a large stimulation of nitrate reductase activity and higher levels of amino acids in higher plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1998;21:253–268. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00277.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Winger A., Purdy S., Maclean A., Pourtau N. The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leaf senescence. New Phytol. 2006;161:781–789. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lambers H. Rising CO2, secondary plant metabolism, plant-herbivore interactions and litter decomposition. Theoretical Considerations. Vegetatio. 1993;104-105:263–271. doi: 10.1007/BF00048157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Suza R., Valio I.F.M. Leaf optical properties as affected by shade in samplings of six tropical tree species differing in succesional status. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2003;15:49–54. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Meyer S., Cerovic Z.G., Goulas Y., Montpied P., Demotes, Bidel L.P.R., Moya I., Dreyer E. Relationship between assessed polyphenols and chlorophyll contents and leaf mass per area ratio in woody plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2006;29:1338–1348. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Michel H., Klaus K. The protective functions of caretenoids and flavonoid pigments against excess visible radiation at chilling temperature investigated in Arabidopsis. Planta. 2001;213:953–966. doi: 10.1007/s004250100572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jaafar H.Z.E. Carbon dioxide enrichment technology for improved productivity under controlled environment system in the tropics. Acta Hort. 2006;742:353–363. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thayumanam B., Sidasivam S. Carbohydrate chemistry. Qual. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1984;34:253–254. doi: 10.1007/BF01126554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Edward J.N. Master Thesis. Faculty of Horticulture and Crop Science; The Ohio State University: 2008. The effects of trinexapac ethyl and three nitrogen sources on creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonnifera) grown under three light environments. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Idso S.B., Kimball B.A., Hendrix D.L. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on chlorophyll and nitrogen nutrition concentrations of four sour orange tree leaves. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1996;36:323–331. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(96)01018-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jaafar Z.E.J., Mohd Hafiz I., Philip E. Leaf gas exchange properties of three varieties of Labisia pumila Benth. under greenhouse conditions. J. Trop. Plant Physiol. 2009;3:16–24. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ibrahim M.H., Jaafar H.Z.E., Haniff M., Yusop R. Changes in the growth and photosynthetic patterns of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedlings exposed to short term CO2 enrichment in a Closed Top Chamber. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2010;32:305–313. doi: 10.1007/s11738-009-0408-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sanz-Saez A., Gorka E., Iker A., Salvador N., Irrogen J.J., Sanchez-Diaz M. Photosynthetic downregulation under elevated CO2 exposure can be prevented by nitrogen supply in nodulated alfalfa. J. Plant Physiol. 2010;167:1558–1565. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]