Abstract
Background
Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, benign, monoarticular entity. Many case-series in adults are described, whereas TGCT is only incidentally reported in children. Therefore, its incidence rate and natural history in children are unknown.
Questions/purposes
(1) How many cases have been reported of this condition, and what were their characteristics? (2) What is the standardized pediatric incidence rate for TGCT? (3) Is there a clinical difference in TGCT between children and adults? (4) What is the risk of recurrence after open resection in children compared with adults?
Methods
Data were derived from three sources: (1) a systematic review on TGCT in children, seeking sources published between 1990 and 2016, included 17 heterogeneous, small case-series; (2) the nationwide TGCT incidence study: the Dutch pediatric incidence rate was extracted from this nationwide study by including patients younger than 18 years of age. This registry-based study, in which eligible patients with TGCT were clinically verified, calculated Dutch incidence rates for localized and diffuse-type TGCT in a 5-year timeframe. Standardized pediatric incidence rates were obtained by using the direct method; (3) from our nationwide bone and soft tissue tumor data registry, a clinical data set was derived. Fifty-seven children with histologically proven TGCT of large joints, diagnosed and treated between 1995 and 2015, in all four tertiary sarcoma centers in The Netherlands, were included. These clinically collected data were compared with a retrospective database of 423 adults with TGCT. Chi-square test and independent t-test were used to compare children and adults for TGCT type, sex, localization, symptoms before diagnosis, first treatment, recurrent disease, followup status, duration of symptoms, and time to followup. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate recurrence-free survival at 2.5 years.
Results
TGCT is seldom reported because only 76 pediatric patients (39 female), 29 localized, 38 diffuse, and nine unknown type, were identified from our systematic review. The standardized pediatric TGCT incidence rate of large joints was 2.42 and 1.09 per million person-years in localized and diffuse types, respectively. From our clinical data set, symptoms both in children and adults were swelling, pain, and limited ROM with a median time before diagnosis of 12 months (range, 1-72 months). With the numbers available, we did not observe differences in presentation between children and adults in terms of sex, symptoms before diagnosis, first treatment, recurrent disease, followup status, or median time to followup. The 2.5-year recurrence-free TGCT survival rate after open resection was not different with the numbers available between children and adults: 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-100%) versus 89% (95% CI, 83%-96%) in localized, respectively (p = 0.527) and 53% (95% CI, 35%-79%) versus 56% (95% CI, 49%-64%) in diffuse type, respectively (p = 0.691).
Conclusions
Although the incidence of pediatric TGCT is low, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis in children with chronic monoarticular joint effusions. Recurrent disease after surgical treatment of this orphan disease seems comparable between children and adults. With targeted therapies being developed, future research should define the most effective treatment strategies for this heterogeneous disease.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study.
Introduction
Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a benign, monoarticular entity. Two histologically identical but clinically different types are distinguished: localized and diffuse lesions [8]. This distinction can be made either on MRI or at the time of surgery. The localized type is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone of 2013 [10] as a well-circumscribed benign small lesion (Fig. 1). By contrast, the diffuse type, previously named pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS), shows unclear boundaries with extensive involvement of the entire synovial membrane and infiltrative growth through adjacent structures [8] (Fig. 2). The knee is the most common large joint affected by TGCT with 46% of localized and 64% of diffuse-type TGCTs affecting that joint; the hand and wrist are the next most common joints affected by the localized form, and the ankle and hip are the next most common joints affected by diffuse TGCT [14]. Delayed diagnosis is not uncommon as a result of different nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms [2, 26], and the definitive diagnosis must be made histologically. The standard treatment remains surgical resection, but recurrence occurs in 4% to 6% patients with localized and 14% to 40% diffuse TGCT affecting the knee [26]. Histologic or radiologic risk factors for recurrent disease are unknown.
Fig. 1 A-B.

Localized type TGCT: MRI of a 6-year-old boy with TGCT in his left knee. (A) Sagittal T1-weighted image showing a well-circumscribed nodular lesion at the synovial lining of the anterior knee compartment. (B) Sagittal T1-weighted spectral presaturation with inversion recovery (SPIR) image after IV gadolinium administration shows heterogeneous enhancement.
Fig. 2A-B.

Diffuse type TGCT: MRI of a 16-year-old boy with TGCT in his left knee. (A) Sagittal T1-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) image shows extensive intra- and extraarticular villous proliferation of synovium. Posterior is a large Baker’s cyst. (B) Transversal T2-weighted TSE image with heterogeneous low to intermediate signal of the TGCT anterior and posterior (straight arrow). Baker’s cyst is shown posteriorly (curved arrow).
All described case-series on TGCT concern adults, whereas TGCT is only incidentally reported in children. Owing to the rarity of the disease, the available evidence base on TGCT contains predominantly retrospective, relatively small cohort studies, including heterogeneous data [7]. Sufficient data on pediatric patients with TGCT are lacking.
We therefore combined a systematic review with analysis from a nationwide pediatric TGCT incidence study in The Netherlands [14] and clinical data on TGCT in children and adults from four tertiary sarcoma centers in The Netherlands to answer the following questions: (1) How many cases have been reported of this condition, and what were their characteristics? (2) What is the standardized pediatric incidence rate for TGCT? (3) Is there a clinical difference in TGCT between children and adults? (4) What is the risk of recurrence after open resection in children compared with adults?
Patients and Methods
Children were defined as patients younger than 18 years at presentation. Large joints were defined as all joints proximal to the metatarsophalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints.
Data were derived from three sources: a systematic review, the nationwide TGCT incidence study, and from our bone and soft tissue tumor data registry.
A systematic review on TGCT in children was performed, seeking sources published between 1990 and 2016. Search terms and MeSH headings were “tenosynovial giant cell”, “diffuse type giant cell”, “giant cell tumors”, “PVNS”, “pigmented villonodular synovitis”, and “synovitis, pigmented villonodular” combined with “infant”, “child”, “neonat”, “pediatric”, “paediatric”, “toddler”, “teen”, “teenager”, “juvenile”, “adolescent”, “girl”, and “boy”. A total of 619 articles were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. All titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers (MJLM, DU) including case-series with at least two TGCT pediatric patients and published in English. Case-series without detailed data on children were excluded, resulting in a data set of 17 heterogeneous, mostly small case-series of two to six patients (Table 1). The largest study included 11 patients with localized TGCT of large joints [11].
Table 1.
Literature overview on TGCT affecting all joints in children, including at least two TGCT cases (1990-2016, English language)*
The Dutch pediatric incidence rate was extracted from the nationwide TGCT incidence study by including patients < 18 years of age [14]. Standardized incidence rates were obtained by using the direct method, applying age-specific incidence rates in each 1-year age group to the WHO standard population (http://seer.cancer.gov). This study by Mastboom et al. [14] was a registry-based study and eligible patients with TGCT were clinically verified. Patients without histologically proven TGCT were not included.
From our national bone and soft tissue tumor data registry (PALGA), a clinical data set was derived, including 57 patients < 18 years with (histologically proven) TGCT in large joints, treated between 1995 and 2015, in one of the four tertiary sarcoma centers in The Netherlands. Clinical, biologic, and imaging data on TGCT type, sex, localization, age at diagnosis, symptoms before diagnosis, treatment(s), recurrence(s), and followup were collected.
A combined retrospective database of two tertiary oncology centers (Leiden University Medical Center and Radboud University Medical Center) in The Netherlands has recorded all patients with TGCT since 1990 (455 patients). TGCT data on children were compared with TGCT data on 423 adults (32 children within this database were excluded from the adult group).
Statistical analyses, for our clinical data set, were predominantly descriptive. Chi-square test was used to compare children and adults on TGCT type, sex (male versus female), localization (knee versus other large joints [hip, ankle, and foot]), symptoms before diagnosis (pain, swelling, and loss of function: yes versus no), first treatment (arthroscopic resection versus open resection), recurrent disease (no recurrence versus recurrence), and followup status. Independent t-test was used to compare median duration of symptoms and median time to followup. All reported p values were two-tailed. Statistical significance level was defined at p < 0.05. The recurrence-free survival curve was assessed with Kaplan-Meier methods.
This study was approved by the institutional review board from the Leiden University Medical Center (medical ethical approved protocol P13.029). Data capturing and analyses were performed at Leiden University Medical Center. SPSS Version 23 (Chicago, IL, USA) was used for analyses.
Results
Our systematic review identified 17 case-series involving 76 children (39 female) with TGCT, 29 localized, 38 diffuse, and nine unknown type (Table 1). The pediatric group ranged from 3 to 18 years of age. The knee was most frequently affected (44 [58%]). Swelling, pain, and limited ROM were described symptoms before diagnosis (mean duration, 15 months). The majority of patients were primarily treated with synovectomy, either arthroscopic or open. Recurrent disease was described in 10 patients (13%). Only five pediatric studies described function or quality of life after treatment. Patients with (multiple) recurrences experienced impaired function and quality of life, according to van der Heijden et al. [27]. Five children with diffuse TGCT, described by de Visser et al. [9], had fair to excellent results on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score after surgical treatment (MSTS by Enneking). Gholve et al. [11] described 11 children with surgically treated localized TGCT without disabling joint function according to a telephone questionnaire survey. Seven surgically treated children, described by Baroni et al. [2], recovered full ROM and two patients showed impaired joint movement with occasional mild to moderate pain in four children with localized and five children with diffuse type. Nakahara et al. [15] showed three children with diffuse disease of the knee with almost maximum Knee Society Scores and improved postoperative ROM of at least 0° to 145°.
The standardized pediatric TGCT incidence rate of large joints was 2.42 and 1.09 per million person-years in localized and diffuse types, respectively [14]. Between 2009 and 2013, 53 children with localized TGCT (excluding digits) and 24 children with diffuse TGCT were diagnosed in The Netherlands. This resulted in a Dutch incidence rate of 2.86 per million person-years for localized TGCT (excluding digits) and 1.30 per million person-years for diffuse TGCT; this was converted to standardized incidence rates (Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1). In both localized and diffuse types, the knee was most commonly affected (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Skeleton showing TGCT localization in children extracted from a Dutch incidence study, excluding digits [14]. In diffuse TGCT, one patient was classified as “other”; he was treated for TGCT in his vertebral column.
Clinical data of TGCT in children from the four Dutch tertiary sarcoma centers seemed similar to those observed in the combined two Dutch retrospective adult databases (Table 2). Fifty-seven children (median age at diagnosis, 16 years; range, 4-18 years) with TGCT of large joints were identified (Table 2). Symptoms before diagnosis were swelling, pain, and limited ROM with a median duration of 12 months (range, 1-72 months). These symptoms and the diagnostic delay seemed similar to those observed in adults (Table 2). Children showed a localized diffuse ratio of one to one; the knee was predominantly affected (13 of 28 [46%] localized, 19 of 29 [66%] diffuse) and there was a predilection for females (15 of 28 [54%] localized, 18 of 29 [62%] diffuse). In 423 adults, the localized:diffuse ratio was 1:1.6; the knee was predominantly affected (121 of 172 [70%] localized, 189 of 251 [75%] diffuse) with a predilection for females (107 of 172 [62%] localized, 142 of 251 [57%] diffuse).
Table 2.
Details of patients with TGCT of large joints in children versus adults, including sex, localization, age, symptoms, first treatment, recurrent disease, and followup†
Recurrence-free survival curves were not different with the numbers available between children and adults at the four involved tumor centers (Fig. 4). The 2.5-year recurrence-free survival, after surgical treatment, in pediatric patients compared with adults was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-100%) versus 89% (95% CI, 83%-96%; p = 0.527) in localized and 53% (95% CI, 35%-79%) versus 56% (95% CI, 49%-64%; p = 0.691) in diffuse type, respectively. In the four involved sarcoma centers, most children and adults alike were primarily surgically treated by open resection: localized TGCT in 25 of 28 children (89%) were thus treated compared with 142 of 172 adults (85%; p = 0.486); for diffuse TGCT in children, the proportion was 22 of 29 (76%) compared with 188 of 251 in adults (75%; p = 0.289). Recurrence risk in children and adults was likewise not different with the numbers available: two of 28 (7%) compared with 22 of 172 (13%; p = 0.365) in localized type and 11 of 29 (38%) compared with 119 of 251 (47%; p = 0.921) in diffuse type, respectively.
Fig. 4.

Local recurrence-free survival curve of localized and diffuse TGCT (Kaplan-Meier), excluding digits. Time zero is the time of the primary surgery. All patients were surgically treated; patients treated with wait-and-see treatment are excluded. In the adult graph, two patients died and were censored at the time of death if recurrence had not occurred.
Discussion
TGCT is most commonly seen in adults in the third and fourth decades of life, but this study confirms that it also affects pediatric patients. The pediatric incidence rate for both localized and diffuse types suggests that it is rare, but we believe it is still common enough to include in the differential diagnosis of both children and adults with nonspecific symptoms like swelling, pain, and limited ROM. We found no differences with the numbers available between children and adults in terms of presenting symptoms, treatments used in the few available case-series, and recurrence-free survival rates. In the era of personalized medicine, future research should define the most effective treatment for TGCT, with its various clinical scenarios, both in children and adults.
There are some limitations to this study. In our systematic review, many case-series included data from children with TGCT in embedded studies that also contained adults’ data. When data on children were not separately described, these children were not included in the overview (Table 1). The determined incidence rate is a conservative estimate, because our search was based on the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in The Netherlands [6]. Patients with TGCT without a biopsy or treatment were not represented in this pathology-based cohort. By standardizing incidence rates, they could be extrapolated to other populations. However, generalizability of the standardized incidence rate depends on the age-specific population structure of the country compared with the WHO population. Included patients had histologically proven TGCT by a dedicated musculoskeletal pathologist (UF, HB, AS, JB). However, patients were not centrally reviewed for this study. Neither functional outcome nor quality of life was evaluated. For TGCT treatment, only surgical treatment was evaluated. Future, comparative studies on treatments should determine what should be done for patients (children and adults) with TGCT. Although surgery is the mainstay, other treatments are used, and future research needs to define what the best approaches are for the various clinical scenarios in which this disease presents. In our patients, children with the localized type frequently lacked longer term followup, mainly as a result of absence of clinical symptoms (17 censored in the first 2.5 years; Fig. 4). Smaller patient numbers with the diffuse type sometimes lacked longer followup (nine censored in the first 2.5 years).
TGCT does not seem to be an adults-only disease and should be considered in the differential diagnosis in children with (chronic) monoarticular joint effusion. Our systematic review identified mainly small, heterogeneous TGCT case-series in children. Future studies might consider including children with TGCT to allow for optimization of the treatment protocol in both children and adults.
The standardized pediatric TGCT incidence rate of large joints was 2.42 and 1.09 per million person-years compared with an overall incidence rate of 10.2 and 4.1 per million person-years in localized and diffuse types, respectively [14]. To date, the incidence rate for chronic monoarthritis in children and adolescents is unknown. Savolainen et al. calculated an incidence rate of 64 per 100,000 for all types of arthritis in children (< 16 years) in a defined population in Finland [22]. Although TGCT in children probably accounts for only a small percentage of all types of arthritis, it should still be considered in the differential diagnosis.
Symptoms in children seemed similar to those in adults (Table 1). Nonspecific symptoms accompanied by pain and diffuse joint swelling with thickening of the synovial capsule and/or joint effusion resulted in limited movement in approximately half of the patients. Studies in adults add mechanical symptoms, instability, and stiffness [19, 26].
A systematic review (without age limitations) in 2013 [26] reported average recurrence rates for localized TGCT in the knee after open resection (4%) and after arthroscopic resection (6%) in contrast to the diffuse type after open resection (14%) and after arthroscopic resection (40%) at a mean followup of 108 months. Patel et al. [19] presented 214 patients with knee TGCT of all ages with a recurrence rate of 9% in 100 localized patients and 48% in 114 patients with diffuse TGCT after a mean followup of 25 months (range, 1-168 months). Palmerini et al. [17] reported 294 patients with TGCT of all ages in all joints with a local failure rate of 14% in localized and 36% in diffuse type after a median followup of 4.4 years (range, 1-20 years). The sole primary disease or patients with a first relapse were included. The current pediatric case-series showed comparable recurrence rates of 7% in localized and 39% in diffuse type after a mean followup of 55 months (range, 7-350 months).
TGCT is a rare condition in adults and it is even less common in children. Nonspecific symptoms often contribute to a delay in establishing a diagnosis. TGCT should be considered in chronic monoarthritis both in adults and in children. Recurrent disease after surgical treatment of this orphan disease seems comparable between children and adults. With targeted therapies now being developed [4], future research should define the most effective treatment strategies for this heterogeneous disease.
Acknowledgments
We thank the dedicated musculoskeletal pathologists, Uta Flucke, Hans Bras, Albert Suurmeijer, and Judith Bovee, for their contributions in diagnosing TGCT.
Footnotes
Each author certifies that neither he or she, nor any member of his or her immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
This work was performed at Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
References
- 1.Abdul-Karim FW, el-Naggar AK, Joyce MJ, Makley JT, Carter JR. Diffuse and localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor and pigmented villonodular synovitis: a clinicopathologic and flow cytometric DNA analysis. Hum Pathol. 1992;23:729–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baroni E, Russo BD, Masquijo JJ, Bassini O, Miscione H. Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee in skeletally immature patients. J Child Orthop. 2010;4:123–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bisbinas I, De Silva U, Grimer RJ. Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the foot and ankle: a 12-year experience from a tertiary orthopedic oncology unit. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:407–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brahmi M, Vinceneux A, Cassier PA. Current systemic treatment options for tenosynovial giant cell tumor/pigmented villonodular synovitis: targeting the CSF1/CSF1R axis. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016;17:10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brien EW, Sacoman DM, Mirra JM. Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:908–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Casparie M, Tiebosch AT, Burger G, Blauwgeers H, van de Pol A, van Krieken JH, Meijer GA. Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncol. 2007;29:19–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chiari C, Pirich C, Brannath W, Kotz R, Trieb K. What affects the recurrence and clinical outcome of pigmented villonodular synovitis? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:172–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.de St Aubain Somerhausen N, van de Rijn M. Tenosynovial giant cell tumour, localized type/diffuse type. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC, Mertens F, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2013:100–103. [Google Scholar]
- 9.de Visser E, Veth RP, Pruszczynski M, Wobbes T, Van de Putte LB. Diffuse and localized pigmented villonodular synovitis: evaluation of treatment of 38 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119:401–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fletcher CDM. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gholve PA, Hosalkar HS, Kreiger PA, Dormans JP. Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath: largest single series in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27:67–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gibbons CL, Khwaja HA, Cole AS, Cooke PH, Athanasou NA. Giant-cell tumour of the tendon sheath in the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1000–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Givon U, Ganel A, Heim M. Pigmented villonodular synovitis. Arch Dis Childhood. 1991;66:1449–1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mastboom MJL, Verspoor FGM, Verschoor AJ, Uittenbogaard D, Nemeth B, Mastboom WJB, Bovée JVMG, Dijkstra PDS, Schreuder HWB, Gelderblom H, Sande van de MAJ; TGCT Study Group. Higher incidence rates than previously known in tenosynovial giant cell tumors. Acta Orthop. 2017:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nakahara H, Matsuda S, Harimaya K, Sakamoto A, Matsumoto Y, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y. Clinical results of open synovectomy for treatment of diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee: case series and review of literature. Knee. 2012;19:684–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Neubauer P, Weber AK, Miller NH, McCarthy EF. Pigmented villonodular synovitis in children: a report of six cases and review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J. 2007;27:90–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Palmerini E, Staals EL, Maki RG, Pengo S, Cioffi A, Gambarotti M, Picci P, Daolio PA, Parafioriti A, Morris C, Antonescu CR, Gronchi A, Casali PG, Donati DM, Ferrari S, Stacchiotti S. Tenosynovial giant cell tumour/pigmented villonodular synovitis: outcome of 294 patients before the era of kinase inhibitors. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:210–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pannier S, Odent T, Milet A, Lambot-Juhan K, Glorion C. [Pigmented villonodular synovitis in children: review of six cases] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94:64–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Patel KH, Gikas PD, Pollock RC, Carrington RW, Cannon SR, Skinner JA, Briggs TW, Aston WJS. Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee: a retrospective analysis of 214 cases at a UK tertiary referral centre. Knee. 2017;24:808–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Perka C, Labs K, Zippel H, Buttgereit F. Localized pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee joint: neoplasm or reactive granuloma? A review of 18 cases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:172–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rosenberg D, Kohler R, Chau E, Bouvier R, Pouillaude JM, David L. [Pigmented villonodular synovitis. Diffuse and localized forms in children] [in French]. Arch Pediatr. 2001;8:381–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Savolainen E, Kaipiainen-Seppanen O, Kroger L, Luosujarvi R. Total incidence and distribution of inflammatory joint diseases in a defined population: results from the Kuopio 2000 arthritis survey. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:2460–2468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sharma H, Jane MJ, Reid R. Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the foot and ankle: forty years of experience from the Scottish bone tumor registry. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45:329–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sharma H, Rana B, Mahendra A, Jane MJ, Reid R. Outcome of 17 pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) of the knee at 6 years mean follow-up. Knee. 2007;14:390–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Somerhausen NS, Fletcher CD. Diffuse-type giant cell tumor: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 50 cases with extraarticular disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:479–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van der Heijden L, Gibbons CL, Hassan AB, Kroep JR, Gelderblom H, van Rijswijk CS, Nout RA, Bradley KM, Athanasou NA, Dijkstra PD, Hogendoorn PC, van de Sande MA. A multidisciplinary approach to giant cell tumors of tendon sheath and synovium–a critical appraisal of literature and treatment proposal. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:433–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.van der Heijden L, Mastboom MJ, Dijkstra PD, van de Sande MA. Functional outcome and quality of life after the surgical treatment for diffuse-type giant-cell tumour around the knee: a retrospective analysis of 30 patients. Bone Joint J. 2014;96:1111–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



