Abstract
In order to offer our patients, the “state of the art” treatment in gynaecology, we need a structured teaching program for trainees concerning the gynaecological skills. In recent years, training and education in endoscopic surgery has been critically reviewed. Clinicians, both surgeons as gynaecologists who perform endoscopic surgery without proper training of the specific psychomotor skills, are at higher risk to increased patient morbidity and mortality. The traditional apprentice-tutor model is no longer valid for developing all skills necessary in gynaecological surgery, particularly in endoscopy. Endoscopic training should happen at both the theoretical and the practical skill level. The acquisition of the correct knowledge regarding general laparoscopy, hysteroscopy and standard level procedures is as important as learning the necessary psychomotor skills to successfully perform endoscopic manipulations. Training in the operating room can only start when it is proven that knowledge and skills are present.
To learn and train total abdominal hysterectomy by laparotomy there are inexpensive simple models that can be used, which are easy to reproduce. The development, construction, cost, and utility of a low-cost and anatomically representative vaginal hysterectomy simulator also has been described.
The complexity of modern surgery has increased the demands and challenges to surgical education and the quality control.
Keywords: Gynaecological skills, Endoscopic surgery, Medical Simulation, GESEA Diploma Programme
Introduction
Today it is generally accepted that the traditional apprentice-tutor model is no longer valid for training all skills necessary in Gynaecological surgery and more specifically endoscopic surgery (Campo et al., 2016b). This agreement is based on the recognition that, in contrast to open surgery, endoscopic surgery demands surgical skills and psychomotor skills that should not necessarily be trained simultaneously. Increasing evidence strongly suggests that psychomotor skills must be trained earlier and outside the operating room, and several models have been proposed for this aim (Sroka et al., 2010; Diesen et al., 2011; Munro, 2012; Mulla et al., 2012; Escamirosa et al., 2015; Hofstad et al., 2013).
Consequently, six leading professional organisations in gynaecology, the ESGE, EBCOG, EAGS, ENTOG, ACOG and AAGL, have issued a joint recommendation regarding endoscopic surgical training and quality assurance. This recommendation states that each hospital teaching endoscopic surgery should provide an endoscopic dry lab for training and improving the physician’s proficiency in endoscopic surgery skills.
The rationale behind this recommendation is that endoscopy demands both psychomotor and surgical skills. It is vital that these psychomotor skills are trained and tested in a safe environment prior to training in the operating room, as it reduces patients’ morbidity and mortality rates, it reduces the patients’ exposure to unskilled trainees and it greatly increases educational efficiency.
In this section, examples of training simulators are provided, some of which are mentioned by commercial name or brand. Please note that many different training tools are available and that the field of simulation is continuously developing. Recommendations and advice on specific training simulators or tools may be found at ESGE.
Knowledge acquisition and psychomotor skills training need to happen via a structured approach, which only allows trainees to progress in the programme when clearly defined and measurable goals have been attained and assessed. A recent study shows that training of basic laparoscopic psychomotor skills (hand-eye coordination) prior to training of suturing skills improves both the acquisition and the retention of more advanced laparoscopic tasks, such as laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying (Molinas et al., 2017), which further indicates the need for a structured approach in which basic psychomotor skills are trained prior to more advanced laparoscopic skills.
Training curriculum
Training trainees to become proficient gynaecological surgeons should not start with training in the OR, but instead in a simulation setting (Molinas et al., 2017). A structured gynaecological training program should fully embrace this approach and encompass a series of well-defined steps, combining dry lab training with in-OR training. At each phase, an assessment should take place to validate whether the trainee can proceed to the next level.
The following steps can be defined in this approach:
Basic endoscopic training (dry lab): Knowledge acquisition of general endoscopic principles and techniques combined with basic practical endoscopic skill training.
Start of in-OR training: After the trainee has proven to be in possession of the necessary basic endoscopic knowledge and practical skills, the in-OR training can be started. In this phase, the trainee can assist an expert endoscopist mentor and is exposed to basic OR practices and teamwork.
Advanced endoscopic training (dry lab): Knowledge acquisition of standard level procedures and training of advanced practical skills.
Start of in-OR surgery: The skills laboratory phase is past and live surgery may be undertaken, according to a stepwise approach starting with close supervision and simple procedures and step by step expanding to less supervision for simple procedures and moving on to more complex ones.
This approach aims to train and assess the necessary endoscopic skills in a dry lab setting as much as possible, before moving onto live patients in the OR. The benefit of this is threefold:
Trainees are much more secure when they enter the OR as they are more confident that they have acquired the necessary knowledge and skills;
Expert mentors do not loose time teaching basic skills, can receive proper assistance from trainees and can focus more on the procedures at hand;
The patient receives better care due to proper trained trainees and is much less exposed to unskilled trainees.
Endoscopic training should happen at both the theoretical and the practical skill level. The acquisition of the correct knowledge regarding general laparoscopy and standard level procedures is as important as learning the necessary psychomotor skills to successfully perform endoscopic manipulations. Training in the operating room can only start when it is proven that knowledge and skills are present.
Knowledge acquisition
The acquisition of general endoscopic knowledge and, at a later stage, of standard level procedures can happen prior to or in parallel with practical skill training. To make this type of training as affordable as possible, it can be offered as an easily accessible structured e-learning programme in combination with self-evaluation modules which the trainee completes and his or her own pace.
This knowledge acquisition can be further supported by one or more group-based sessions and should always be followed by an official assessment of the trainee.
Example: The Winners Project e-learning programme offers free of charge online tutorials and theoretical assessment of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic knowledge.
Practical skills training
As it is widely accepted that dry lab training prior to training in the OR reduces patients’ morbidity and mortality in all endoscopic surgical disciplines, it is critical that practical skills can be trained in-house by using a structured approach with validated methods and training tools. Furthermore, a management platform is required to facilitate this structured approach regarding data collection and report generation.
Management platform
To achieve a structured programme, it is vital that the necessary support software is available that can manage all data collection. This collection of data occurs at two levels: the profiles and experience of the trainees, and the results of the training and test sessions that are carried out. Ideally, such a system should offer the possibility to view the progress of the trainees over time, to compare the training results with peers by means of a benchmark according to exposure level and to automatically issue all relevant reports and potential certificates.
Examples & equipment
Laparotomy and basic surgical skills
For basic skills, very simple models are described to train the surgical skills:
foam rubber tube, which can be used to train e.g. suturing skills or manufacture a simple vaginal cuff model;
tubular balloons that can replicate the ureters (simulate ureter anastomosis, etc) and the tubes (tubal surgery)
Cloths for suturing and knotting training
Balloons to replicate ovarian cystectomy
To learn and train total abdominal hysterectomy by laparotomy there are inexpensive simple models that can be used, which are easy to reproduce (Hong et al. 2012). When combined with a didactic lecture and real instruments for instruction, it may be a valuable simulator tool in trainee education. The total abdominal hysterectomy model was constructed to include the uterus, uterine arteries, ovaries, bladder, supporting ligaments, triple pedicle, vagina, and ureters.
Vaginal hysterectomy (VH), posterior and anterior compartments repair
The development, construction, cost, and utility of an inexpensive and anatomically representative VH simulator has been described. After multiple materials and solutions were evaluated and tested, a VH and posterior/anterior compartments repair simulators that incorporated strengths from each concept has been constructed (Barrier et al. 2012) (Geoffrion et al. 2016).
laparoscopy
The advised dry lab setup for training laparoscopic skills includes the following:
Pelvic trainer: The pelvic trainer simulates the ports that are used when performing a laparoscopic procedure on a patient. Their main goal is to restrict the movement of the instruments and to necessitate the use of an endoscopic camera. Together with training models, they form an ideal combination to train skills like camera navigation and proper hand-eye coordination.
Training models for laparoscopic psychomotor skills: The training model is placed inside in a pelvic trainer and provides a number of exercises which will train the basic laparoscopic instrument handling skills, like camera navigation and hand-eye coordination, including bimanual coordination.
Training models for laparoscopic suturing skills: The laparoscopic suturing skills model is placed inside a pelvic trainer and allows to perform stitching and knotting exercises and various levels of difficulty.
All-in training model for laparoscopic psychomotor and suturing skills example: Encilap all-in training model
Using a tubular balloon, it is possible to make a longitudinal incision to replicate the salpingostomy, and a complete cut for salpingectomy.
Using a balloon filled with water involved by a second balloon, it is possible to make the translation of an ovarian cystectomy (removing the external balloon avoiding the rupture of the internal one).
hysteroscopy
The advised dry lab setup for training hysteroscopic skills includes the following:
Female genital model To make the simulation as close to real life as possible, it is advisable to use female genital models in which the training models can be placed.
Training models for hysteroscopic psychomotor skills The training model is placed inside the female genital model and provides relevant exercises which simulate all possible movements during a hysteroscopic procedure. Example:
Training models for diagnosis Training of diagnostic cases is typically done by means of lectures and videos. However, using simulated models offers a significant benefit over traditional methods as they teach the trainee how to enter the cavity and proceed with caution, to identify the anatomical position of the abnormalities, to properly formulate what can be seen, to present this to their peers and to stipulate a resulting diagnosis. The diagnostic training models are placed inside a female genital model.
Gynaecological skills to be trained (core curriculum)
Skills in outpatient clinic:
Placement of Intra Uterine Device
Placement of subcutaneous implants
Endometrial biopsy
Colposcopy (with biopsy)
LLETZ of the cervix
Basic (core) conventional surgical skills:
Punch biopsy under local anaesthesia
Surgical marsupialization of cyst
Surgical excision of abscess
More advanced (core) conventional surgical skills
Laparotomy with minimal adhesiolysis
Salpingo-oophorectomy by laparotomy
Simple anterior vaginal repair
imple posterior vaginal repair
Myomectomy of subserous myoma by laparotomy
Colpocleisis (at least in simulation setting)
Basic (core) endoscopic skills:
Laparoscopy:
Diagnostic laparoscopy
Diagnostic laparoscopy with tubal testing
Simple laparoscopic adhesiolysis
Laparoscopic sterilization
Laparoscopic removal of ectopic pregnancy (salpingostomy) or salpingectomy
Laparoscopic needle aspiration of simple cysts
Laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the ovary
Simple laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy
Laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy
Hysteroscopy:
Diagnostic hysteroscopy
Diagnostic hysteroscopy with tubal testing
Hysteroscopic polyp resection
Hysteroscopic myoma resection type 0-1 (< 4 cm)
Integrating simulation training in the curriculum
According to Harden et al. (2016) and Thomas et al. (2016):
Needs: implement gynaecological skills training in prior to clinical activities
Aims and objectives: develop uniform and structured educational and training programs in Europe
Content: structured educational, training and assessment program in gynaecology
Organisation of content: Free access to peer reviewed tutorials with self-evaluated models; Acquiring psychomotor skills with dry lab inanimate models; Standardized validated evaluation of the above skills; Entering the clinical teaching program if appropriate.
Educational strategies: Structuring from knowledge to skills, and then to clinical activity; Objective evaluation module for each of the above; Objective evaluation methodology of the tutors.
Teaching methods: Accessible, validated and affordable; Standardized dry lab training exercises; Internet access; Apprentice-tutor model after theoretical knowledge and psychomotor skills acquisition.
Assessment: objective structural exercises evaluation, certification, preferably external assessors, reports by tutors or supervisors, scales of self-assessment, continuous and end-of course assessment, exams for theoretical knowledge evaluation.
Communication: local scientific societies, teaching hospitals committees, trainees, tutors/supervisors.
Educational environment: Local infrastructure with access to knowledge (online video tutorials, structured learning programs) and dry labs; Larger skills labs for surgical competences with a dedicated training environment where you acquire inter-professional team skills, dedicated endoscopic clinical teaching facilities (animal lab, life surgery, virtual reality).
Process: Inform national societies about the content of the program. Provide them different tools needed for applying the program: - Free access to peer reviewed tutorials with self-evaluated models (like GESEA program); - Acquiring psychomotor skills with dry lab inanimate models (pelvic trainers, boxes where would be possible to perform simple exercises with pins/rings using a webcam);
Acquiring surgical competences using accessible and inexpensive models (e.g. abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, ectopic pregnancy, anterior and posterior compartments defects correction) following a “step by step” simulation program.
Providing standardized validated evaluation of the above skills (online score platforms); If appropriate entering into the clinical teaching program.
Example of a simulation training program in endoscopic skills
The European Academy of Gynaecological Surgery, together with the ESGE, has elaborated a well-balanced diploma curriculum: Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) programme which is based on a structured approach similar to what is proposed in this document (Campo et al., 2016a).
The GESEA Diploma Programme currently consists of two active levels, a Bachelor level and a Minimal Invasive Gynaecological Surgeon (MIGS) level.
The GESEA Bachelor (level 1) is open to all endoscopists and specifically aimed at trainees. It starts with the bachelor tutorials on the Winners E-learning platform and is followed by practical psychomotor skill exercises in for laparoscopy (LASTT and SUTT1) and hysteroscopy (HYSTT1). The exam consists of a theoretical test and practical tests and the obtained certificate serves as a license to enter the OR as the programme provides the necessary skills needed to start in-OR training.
The GESEA MIGS (level 2) is open to both gynaecologists and reproductive surgeons and starts with more in-depth tutorials on the Winners E-learning platform. The training exercises feature advanced practical psychomotor skills (LASTT, SUTT2 and HYSTT2) and the obtained certificate serves as a license for conventional gynaecological laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgical interventions.
To be following this program, one will require access to (minimum):
Inanimate models for open surgical skills
Endoscopic GESEA program
Infrastructure
CORE: Dry Skill lab installed with computer access for online video tutorials, endoscopic hardware and training tools preferentially accessible to all surgical disciplines. Virtual reality trainers are acceptable but do not have an advantage above the low cost inanimate models.
ELECTIVES: Virtual reality trainer, inter-professional team skills, cadaver training and animal training courses. Live surgical sessions or streaming learning sessions. To profit from professional training environment it should be organised in regional or even supra-national training centres.
Conclusion
The correct education and training on gynecological skills should be supported on tested and validated models allowing a uniform and effective implementation. This structured teaching program, supported on adequate simulation tools, may be diffused among trainees resulting at the end in an improvement on the health care offered to our patients.
References
- 1.Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koutras C, et al. Endoscopy and laparoscopy: a historical aspect of medical terminology. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3650–3654. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2389-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ascher-Walsh CJ, Capes T. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:719–723. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barrier BF, Thompson AB, McCullough MW, et al. A novel and inexpensive vaginal hysterectomy simulator. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:374–379. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318266d0c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burden C, Oestergaard J, Larsen CR. Integration of laparoscopic virtual-reality simulation into gynaecology training. BJOG. 2011;118(Suppl 3):5–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Campo R, Molinas CR, De Wilde RL, et al. Are you good enough for your patients? The European certification model in laparoscopic surgery. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4:95–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Campo R, Wattiez A, Tanos V, et al. Gynaecological endoscopic surgical education and assessment. A diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Gynecol Surg. 2016a;13:133–137. doi: 10.1007/s10397-016-0957-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Campo R, Wattiez A, Tanos V, et al. Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment. A diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery’. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016b;199:183–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.De Win G, Everaerts W, De Ridder D, et al. Laparoscopy training in Belgium: results from a nationwide survey, in urology, gynecology, and general surgery residents. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015;6:55–63. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S75747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Diesen DL, Erhunmwunsee L, Bennett KM, et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices. J Surg Educ. 2011;68:282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Escamirosa FP, Flores RM, Garcia IO, et al. Face, content, and construct validity of the EndoViS training system for objective assessment of psychomotor skills of laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3392–3403. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gala R, Orejuela F, Gerten K, et al. Effect of validated skills simulation on operating room performance in obstetrics and gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:578–584. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318283578b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Geoffrion R, Suen MW, Koenig NA, et al. Teaching Vaginal Surgery to Junior Residents: Initial Validation of 3 Novel Procedure-Specific Low-Fidelity Models. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:157–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ghomi A, Littman P, Prasad A, et al. Assessing the learning curve for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. JSLS. 2007;11:190–194. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harden RM. Ten questions to ask when planning a course or curriculum. Med Educ. 1986;20:356–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01379.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hofstad EF, Vapenstad C, Chmarra MK, et al. A study of psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery: what differentiates expert and nonexpert performance. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:854–863. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2524-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hong A, Mullin PM, Al-Marayati L, et al. A low-fidelity total abdominal hysterectomy teaching model for obstetrics and gynecology residents. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:123–126. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31823471bb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hur HC, Arden D, Dodge LE, et al. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: a surgical skills assessment tool in gynecology. JSLS. 2011;15:21–26. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466009122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD004751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004751.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Molinas CR, Binda MM, Campo R. Dominant hand, non-dominant hand, or both? The effect of pre-training in hand-eye coordination upon the learning curve of laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying. Gynecol Surg. 2017;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1015-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mulla M, Sharma D, Moghul M, et al. Learning basic laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled study comparing box trainer, virtual reality simulator, and mental training. J Surg Educ. 2012;69:190–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Munro MG. Surgical simulation: where have we come from? Where are we now? Where are we going? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:272–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, et al. 2009. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev;2009:CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Palter VN, Orzech N, Reznick RK, et al. Validation of a structured training and assessment curriculum for technical skill acquisition in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013;257:224–230. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827051cd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sinitsky DM, Fernando B, Berlingieri P. Establishing a curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skills in the virtual reality environment. Am J Surg. 2012;204:367–376.:e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2010;199:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stefanidis D, Acker C, Heniford BT. Proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training leads to improved operating room skill that is resistant to decay. Surg Innov. 2008;15:69–73. doi: 10.1177/1553350608316683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang JF, Zhang SZ, Zhang NY, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:90. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0859-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]