Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic remitting disorder with increasing incidence worldwide. The intestinal epithelial barrier plays a major role in IBD, contributing to its pathogenesis, evolution, and perpetuation over time. Until recently, studies focused on exploring the role of the intestinal epithelium in IBD were hampered by the lack of techniques for the long-term culturing of human primary epithelial cells ex vivo. Recently, however, a methodology for generating stable human 3D epithelial cultures directly from adult intestinal stem cells was established. These long-term cultures, called organoids, mimic the tissue of origin and can be generated from small-size intestinal tissue samples, making it a promising tool for modeling the course of IBD.
In this review, we provide an overview of the versatility of human organoid cultures in IBD modeling. We discuss recent advances and current limitations in the application of this tool for modeling the contribution of the intestinal epithelium alone and in combination with other key cellular and molecular players in the context of IBD pathophysiology. Finally, we outline the pressing need for technically standardizing the laboratory manipulation of human epithelial organoids for their broader implementation in clinically oriented IBD studies.
Keywords: IBD, disease modeling, intestinal epithelium, human epithelial organoids
INTRODUCTION
Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) of uncertain etiology, characterized by alternating periods of activity and remission.1, 2 The current consensus holds that IBD may result from an inappropriate immune response to commensal microorganisms, with genetic susceptibility and environmental factors contributing, to varying degrees, to the disease risk.3 Incidence of IBD is increasing worldwide, in both pediatric and adult populations,4, 5 strongly suggesting that environmental cues play some role.
Growing evidence suggests that the intestinal epithelium, a monolayer of epithelial cells that governs the interactions between the luminal microbiota and the underlying lamina propria, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of IBD (Fig. 1).6, 7 Several IBD-associated genetic risk loci affect pathways active in epithelial cells, which are involved in essential functions such as bacterial sensing, autophagy, and endoplasmic reticulum stress.8 In addition, dysfunctions in the epithelial barrier, secondary to acute or chronic inflammation, are also characteristic of IBD.9 During active disease, pro-inflammatory factors are released in the intestinal mucosa, progressively damaging the epithelial layer.10, 11 This exposes the underlying lamina propria to luminal antigens and consequently amplifies the inflammatory response, which may become chronic and difficult to manage. The epithelium is also actively involved in repair processes that are endogenously activated to re-establish mucosal homeostasis.12, 13 Re-epithelialization is an essential process in achieving mucosal healing and represents a gold standard in both UC and CD management. Indeed, mucosal healing is associated with more favorable prognoses, fewer hospitalizations, and lower surgery rates.14 Nonetheless, we have previously shown that the intestinal epithelium of patients with UC can harbor lasting alterations despite complete endoscopic and histologic remission.15 We hypothesized that these persistent alterations in the epithelium of remitting IBD patients could also contribute to disease perpetuation, including neoplastic degeneration, which has been observed in long-standing IBD.16
FIGURE 1.
Human adult epithelial stem cell–derived organoids in inflammatory bowel disease modeling. The healthy gut epithelial barrier (Panel 1, left side of the picture) is a monolayer of columnar cells organized into invaginations called crypts. It represents the interface between the intestinal lumen, containing the gut microbiota on 1 side, and the lamina propria (LP), where immune and mesenchymal cells reside, on the other. Adult stem cells (ASCs) reside at the bottom of each crypt (ASC niche) and continuously give rise to daughter cells that differentiate into the various epithelial subtypes. The disruption of the epithelial layer contributes to both the development and the perpetuation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Injury to the mucosa, which is the hallmark of active IBD, can result from a predisposing genetic and/or epigenetic background (Panel 1, right side of the picture) in some patients, combined with aberrant pro-inflammatory signals from the surrounding luminal and LP environment (Panel 2). Intrinsic mechanisms are then activated within the intestinal mucosa that promote wound healing and thus restore tissue homeostasis (Panel 3). However, permanently disturbed epithelial functions that are not restored during remission may contribute to the persistence of IBD over time (Panel 4). Patient-specific organoid cultures generated from the ASCs of non-IBD and IBD mucosa represent a versatile tool for exploring the role of the epithelium in the diverse IBD-relevant scenarios depicted in the figure (A–C). By using “omics” technologies, for instance, cohorts of pure epithelial cultures (A) can be used to obtain in-depth profiles of the epithelial genetic/epigenetic background or the effect of engineered genetic mutations (Panel 1). Similarly, “omics” approaches can also be applied to organoid cultures to interrogate the effects of this background or of epigenetic marks (acquired from the persistent exposure of the epithelial lining to pro-inflammatory signals) (A) in IBD perpetuation (Panel 4). Alternatively, 3D organoid cultures can be adapted, for example, to a 2D platform, to study the effects of the direct or indirect (eg, through secreted mediators) interactions of the epithelium with the luminal microbiota (B) and LP cells (C) during the different stages of IBD pathophysiology (Panels 2, 3, and 4).
Until recently, the study of the functional role of the intestinal epithelium in IBD has been hampered by the inability to stably maintain cultures of these cells in vitro. A major technical breakthrough in the practice of laboratory manipulation of human intestinal epithelial cells is the recent development of 3D culture systems, also known as organoid cultures, derived from self-organizing pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) or intestinal adult stem cells (ASCs).17, 18 When supplied with growth factors and signals that mimic the intestinal stem niche environment, organoids can expand for several months.19These cultures can reflect the architecture, regional specification, and cell composition of the epithelium in vivo,20–23 and in the case of PSC-derived organoids, they are able to generate adjacent stromal cells. Increasing evidence shows that both PSC- and ASC-derived organoid cultures represent promising approaches for studying the role of the intestinal epithelium in homeostasis and in several human disorders,24–28 including inflammatory diseases.
In this review, we provide an overview on the present understanding and future applications of ex vivo human organoid cultures with a specific focus on the ASC-derived culture system, their potential uses in clinically oriented research, and the current advantages and technical limitations in IBD modeling.
POTENTIAL USES OF HUMAN ADULT STEM CELL–DERIVED INTESTINAL ORGANOIDS IN IBD MODELING
The first organoid cultures from primary intestinal tissue were generated from sorted Lgr5+ ASCs derived from mouse small intestinal crypts.20 Mouse epithelial organoid cultures were then modified and optimized for the generation of 3D organoids from ASCs expanded directly from human intestinal crypts.19, 29 ASC-derived organoid cultures can contain multiple cell types30, 31 or can be purely epithelial if generated from isolated intestinal crypts or single epithelial cells.18, 32 The latter have also been referred to as enteroids or colonoids, depending upon whether they are generated from the small or large intestine.33
The versatility of the ASC-derived organoid culture system makes it a powerful tool to explore the role of the epithelium in IBD (Fig. 1). Indeed, these organoids can be expanded from intestinal tissue samples of healthy and IBD mucosa in both adult and pediatric patients, with comparable growth efficiency.34, 35 Moreover, organoid cultures can be efficiently generated from both the human small intestine and colon and are able to retain the location-specific transcriptional and epigenetic profiles of the intestinal segment from which they have been drawn, even after prolonged culture.36–38 ASC-derived organoids are also genetically stable.39 Genetic and epigenetic stability represent a clear advantage of ASC-derived organoids over PSC-derived human intestinal organoids, which can acquire genetic and epigenetic variations during the reprogramming process or culturing.40 In contrast to transformed intestinal cell lines, which are usually composed of only 1 cell type (eg, Caco2, enriched in enterocyte-like cells, or HT29, enriched in Goblet-like cells41, 42), ASC-enriched organoids can give rise to all of the differentiated lineages that populate the intestinal crypt,20 even those less represented, like enteroendocrine, tuft, or M cells.43–45 This aspect is very important for disease modeling due to the fact that defects in several epithelial cell type functions have been observed in IBD.46, 47
Another advantage of ASC-derived organoid cultures is that they can be generated from a very limited amount of intestinal tissue (ie, endoscopic biopsies). This offers a 2-fold benefit: 1) endoscopic biopsies provide a source of organoid cultures from endoscopically inactive or mildly active areas that are rarely obtained from surgical samples; 2) control samples can be accessed from a more appropriate age-matched non-IBD group (patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening colonoscopies and who are free of cancerous or precancerous lesions).
Recent technical advances in the culturing of human organoids will further foster their use in IBD modeling. For example, 2D cultures derived from 3D organoids48–50 represent a valuable alternative to other 2D cultures of primary epithelial cells, such as the air–liquid interface cultures of intestinal stem cells,51 for studying host–microbiota interactions in IBD. The observation that 2D cultures can be differentiated toward secretory cell populations52 makes this organoid-derived culture system a useful tool for exploring how epithelial factors from specific cell subpopulations, like the recently discovered sentinel goblet cells, for example,53 can modulate the adhesion of IBD-associated bacterial strains. Similarly, an increasing number of studies show promising results using co-cultures of pure epithelial ASC-derived organoids that include mesenchymal or immune cells.54–56 The addition of this level of complexity to the organoid system could yield a more physiologically accurate model for dissecting IBD pathogenesis; however, no studies using this approach have been published thus far in the context of IBD.
Moreover, organoid cultures are amenable to genetic modifications. Indeed, genetic editing based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been successfully tested in organoid cultures from patients with CRC57, 58 and cystic fibrosis.59 In addition, the gymnosis technique for knocking down gene expression has recently been validated in mouse intestinal organoids.60 Inflammatory bowel disease could also benefit from these approaches, especially in those cases, such as in very early-onset IBD (VEO-IBD; see the next section), where a specific genetic mutation is responsible for a defect in the intestinal epithelial barrier.61
Finally, intestinal ASC-derived organoid cultures can be cryopreserved with high rates of recovery upon thawing. This practice facilitates the establishment of living biobanks of patient-derived organoids that can be very useful to translational studies in which accessibility to patient samples is often a limiting factor. Studies showing a high genetic concordance between cryopreserved organoid cultures and corresponding biopsy specimens from CRC patients have already been published.62 Indeed, IBD organoid culture biobanks are already available to researchers.63
In the following sections, we will explore in more detail the use of human intestinal organoid cultures in IBD modeling. We will focus on the role of the epithelium in contributing to IBD predisposition via its genetic and epigenetic background and to mucosal injury, wound repair, and disease perpetuation and how organoids could be used to study all of these phenomena.
Use of Epithelial Organoids to Study the Impact of the Genetic and Epigenetic Background on the IBD Epithelium
Increasing evidence shows that genetic alterations affecting intestinal epithelial functions can play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IBD (Fig. 1, Panel 1). Most forms of IBD are polygenic, with multiple susceptibility loci contributing to the overall risk of disease. Thus far, genome-wide association studies have identified approximately 250 risk loci.64 Some of the variants associated with intestinal epithelial cell functions have been shown to correlate with abnormal epithelial cell phenotypes, such as in the case of small intestinal Paneth cells.65, 66 In addition to polygenic IBD, there are rare forms of IBD with very early onset (eg, VEO-IBD, occurring in children younger than 5 years old), where the role of host genetics on disease development is prominent. In these Mendelian forms of IBD, genetic defects affecting epithelial function have also been identified in some patients (eg, ADAM17, TRIM22, TTC7A67–69). As organoid cultures retain the genetic makeup of the original tissue, they offer suitable material for exploring genetic–phenotypic associations in IBD, similar to what has been done in mono-factorial forms of CRC and monogenic diseases, such as cystic fibrosis.25, 70 Through extended expansion, sufficient genetically stable material can be obtained and applied to a wide array of laboratory techniques, from standard DNA-, RNA-, and protein-based approaches to advanced “omics” technologies (eg, single-cell RNA sequencing, MethylC sequencing, mass spectrometry) and live imaging (Fig. 1A).23, 71–73 However, due to the low frequency of these phenotype-associated genetic alterations, the introduction of mutations into normal organoids (eg, by CRISPR/Cas9, TALEN, or ZFN technologies74) may represent a better alternative for studying the impact of these mutations on epithelial cell function (Fig. 1A). The use of the organoid system has also contributed to the identification of age-dependent differences in the human intestinal epithelium that could affect its function. For example, it has been shown that epithelial ASCs accumulate spontaneous genetic mutations during their lifetime, which could promote intestinal tumorigenesis.75 In line with this, it has been observed that the epithelium from fetal, vs adult, subjects showed intrinsic differences in response to external stimuli when a monolayer derived from a human organoid culture was challenged with pro-inflammatory cytokines.76 Taken together, these observations suggest that organoid cultures represent reliable systems to reproduce intrinsic epithelial alterations ex vivo.
The presence of epigenetic marks in the epithelium of IBD patients (Fig. 1, Panel 1) has also been recently identified. In 1 recent work, Howell et al. showed that changes in the DNA methylation profile of purified IBD epithelium present at diagnosis were stably maintained during follow-up regardless of the mucosal inflammatory status.77 Such changes were partly retained in derived organoid cultures, reinforcing the idea of the primary nature of this epigenetic imprinting.
Use of Epithelial Organoids to Model the Inter actions of the Epithelium With the Environment in Mucosal Injury and Wound Repair
In the context of acute or chronic intestinal inflammation, the epithelium contributes to the overall damage by amplifying the inflammatory response induced by microbial and lamina propria factors (Fig. 1, Panel 2).78 The ASC-derived organoid culture system provides a promising platform for examining ex vivo the result of the crosstalk of the epithelium with the surrounding pro-inflammatory environment (including both soluble and cellular components) in the context of IBD. In particular, organoid cultures from healthy subjects can serve to explore the specific biological role played by IBD-associated pro-inflammatory factors in epithelial barrier integrity. Conversely, healthy organoids that have been genetically edited with IBD-associated mutations (as discussed above) or those from IBD patients can be exploited to explore the cumulative effect of genetics and a pro-inflammatory environment on epithelial integrity. This feature can be particularly useful in cases where genetic and epigenetic variants do not translate to a direct effect on the epithelial behavior or phenotype, unless the contribution of immune, stromal, or luminal factors is also considered.79
The ASC-derived organoid culture system has been already successfully used to investigate the effects of diffusible compounds on the intestinal epithelium, supporting their potential use in IBD modeling (Fig. 1B, C). For example, 2 of the best-characterized pro-inflammatory cytokines in IBD, IFN-γ and TNFα, have been shown to influence epithelial functions in 3D-cultured organoids.80, 81 Thus, organoid cultures could also be helpful in elucidating the function of other cytokines, the role of which on the epithelial barrier remains controversial.82 Moreover, evidence that specific microbial communities are associated with CD and UC83 makes the study of the complex interactions of the epithelium with whole or isolated components of the gut microbiota another promising application of the organoid system. For example, it could help elucidate the contribution of alterations in the microbiota–host crosstalk to mucosal injury. Indeed, the organoid culture system has also been implemented to assess the effects of microbial-derived metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, on the epithelium.84, 85 Interestingly, Kaiko et al. showed that, although protective to the upper epithelial crypt, butyrate had detrimental effects on the epithelial stem cell compartment,86 challenging the supposed beneficial role played by this metabolite in active IBD.87 Based on their observation, they proposed that intestinal crypts play a role in protecting stem cells at the bottom of the crypt from microbial metabolites by limiting their access to this cell subset, which relies on continuous proliferation and is essential for crypt regeneration. One could argue that in the context of crypt destruction in the ulcerated mucosa of IBD patients, stem cells may be exposed to higher concentrations of metabolites and other luminal factors normally excluded from the lower crypt compartment. Organoids therefore represent a relatively simple system for studying interactions with diffusible molecules such as cytokines or metabolites.
Notably, the apical side of the organoid, which is targeted by microorganisms in vivo, is oriented toward the inner lumen of the spheroid. Several approaches have been introduced to facilitate access to microorganisms, making the system more physiologically relevant (Fig. 1B). For example, microinjection of bacteria into the organoids demonstrated that microorganisms can persist in a viable state in the spheroid inner lumen and affect several physiological functions of the epithelial barrier.88, 89 Similarly, by using human 2D-converted organoid cultures, the effect of microbial colonization on mucosal homeostasis has been explored. For example, recent studies show that pathogenic bacteria can not only cause significant changes in epithelial permeability and tight junction distribution, but can also compromise the mucus layer integrity,90 both important contributing factors to IBD pathophysiology.91–93 Although studies examining viruses in IBD are limited, growing evidence indicates a role of the gut virome in IBD pathogenesis.94, 95 In that sense, the organoid system could also be used to model virus–epithelium interactions, for example, by infecting dissociated organoids with eukaryotic viral particles, similar to what has been done in manipulating organoid gene expression using the lentiviral system.96
The organoid culture also provides a system to mimic ex vivo the cell contact–dependent or –independent interactions between the epithelium and lamina propria intestinal cell types in IBD (Fig. 1C). Promising results have been published on co-cultures of primary epithelial cell cultures with mesenchymal cells. Notably, the establishment of the epithelial monolayer–adipocyte co-culture showed that pro-inflammatory responses can be mutually activated in these 2 cell populations through paracrine signals without the influence of immune cells.97 This system could, therefore, offer a new tool for exploring the interactions of the epithelial barrier with mesenteric adipose tissue, for which a role in IBD has been recently postulated.98 Organoid cultures have also been used as a promising model to study the interactions of the epithelium with specific subpopulations of immune cells. Nozaki et al., for example, by generating co-cultures of murine organoids and intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs),54 gained insights into the characterization of survival and motility mechanisms of IELs, which have recently been shown to be altered in IBD mucosa.99 Similarly, co-cultures of human organoid–derived monolayers with macrophages have helped elucidate how the epithelium and innate immune cells coordinate the response to enteric pathogens.56
Similar to the induction of epithelial injury, restitution of the epithelial barrier is also an active process orchestrated by luminal factors, epithelial cells, and the stromal compartment (Fig. 1, Panel 3).100, 101 During epithelial healing, the wound-associated epithelium (WAE)102 loses polarity and starts migrating toward the lesion to restore integrity.103 Multiple factors are released during this phase, both by mesenchymal cells and by the epithelium itself.12, 13
Organoid cultures can be a useful tool for elucidating the mechanisms of wound healing mediated by stromal factors (Fig. 1C). For example, studies co-culturing mouse organoids and fibroblasts have revealed that the latter improve epithelial growth and survival, suggesting that these cells play a role in providing prosurvival factors for epithelial stem cells.55 Similarly, recently established co-cultures of mouse intestinal organoids and primary neuronal cells have shed new light on the importance of signals from the enteric nervous system in promoting the survival of specific epithelial cell subpopulations.104 This co-culture system could provide a novel tool for revealing the role of enteric nervous system abnormalities in the pathophysiology of IBD.105 Miyoshi et al. recently proposed a novel mechanism of wound repair mediated by the epithelium. They showed that the addition of PGE2 to epithelial organoid cultures promotes their differentiation to WAE cells through the Ptger4-mediated signaling pathway, reporting similar results in vivo.106 The flexibility of 3D organoid cultures to grow in a monolayer also makes them useful as a tool for performing other assays geared toward exploring the role of the epithelium in wound healing, such as the Transwell migration or wound scratch assays.107 Organoids show high responsiveness to the stroma-derived soluble factors that are released during intestinal inflammation and promote epithelial regeneration, including IL-22 and IL-6,108, 109 and to cytokines, such as IL-33, which stimulate the recovery of functionally differentiated lineages.110 Organoid cultures have also been useful tools for uncovering Wnt-dependent mechanisms associated with epithelial regeneration in IBD.111 For example, localized Wnt5a release on organoid cultures, which mimics wound channels, suppresses proliferation in a TGF-β-dependent manner, thus giving new insight into the role of noncanonical Wnts in new crypt formation after tissue injury.112 Based on these results, it is conceivable that human organoid cultures could also be useful for exploring the role of endogenous lipid mediators and lesser-known microbial metabolites (eg, derivatives of tryptophan and Gamma-aminobutyric acid), which have been shown to contribute to the resolution of tissue inflammation113 but whose beneficial effects on the intestinal epithelium are only now becoming better understood (Fig. 1B).114, 115
Use of Epithelial Organoids to Model Changes in the IBD Epithelium Over Time
Inflammatory bowel disease is chronically relapsing in nature. This behavior suggests that subclinical mechanisms acquired during inflammation remain altered in IBD patients during remission, thereby contributing to disease perpetuation and progression over time (Fig. 1, Panel 4). Multiple studies reported that a number of transcriptional changes persist in the intestinal mucosa of IBD patients well after complete resolution of the inflammatory flare; many of these alterations are associated with the epithelium.15, 116–118 Moreover, in a recent study, we demonstrated that organoid cultures derived from IBD patients exhibit altered transcriptional signatures, suggesting that the stem compartment is engraved with changes potentially acquired during previous local exposure to inflammation.119 In line with these results, the contribution of prolonged inflammation in imprinting the epithelium with lasting expression changes appears evident in the recently established “inflamed organoid model.”120 In this system, prolonged treatment of organoid cultures with a cocktail of pro-inflammatory cytokines induced the persistent activation of NFKB signaling and reactive oxygen species production that continued long after removal of the inflammatory milieu. As proposed by the authors, this system could be useful for modeling how chronic inflammation leads to transformation of the epithelial compartment, a phenomenon often associated with CRC development in IBD patients.121 Chronic or recurrent inflammation also plays a major role in the initiation of intestinal fibrosis, another common complication in IBD.122 The recent establishment of the organoid-based epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (OEMT) model123 showed how stimulation with pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TGF-β and TNF-α, synergistically produced marked mesenchymal changes in the intestinal epithelium, making the OEMT a promising model with which to dissect the role of epithelial–mesenchymal transition in intestinal fibrosis.
In addition, studies involving organoid samples generated from well-defined subpopulations of IBD patients (Fig. 1A) could contribute to the molecular stratification of the disease, similar to what has been done using intestinal tissue samples.124, 125 Ideally, identification of the links between epithelial expression phenotypes and IBD clinical behavior (eg, disease course, response to treatment, risk of progression to colitis-associated CRC) could complement the information derived from conventional clinical classification and genetic association studies.126
Growing evidence supports the idea that epigenetic marks are not only primarily present in the intestinal epithelium (as discussed above) but are also acquired by IBD mucosa during the course of the disease.127 Among them, alterations in the DNA methylation profile and in noncoding RNA (ie, miRNA and lncRNA) expression have been identified in the mucosa of IBD patients.128, 129 Multiple epigenetic mechanisms seem to specifically regulate epithelial function, both in homeostasis and IBD130–132; lamina propria and microbial signals are largely responsible for regulating these mechanisms.60, 133 Organoid cultures can be helpful to test the role of lasting epithelial changes induced by disease-dependent stromal and bacterial factors in promoting IBD persistence (Fig. 1B, C). This is possible because organoids, in contrast to short-term cultured crypts or primary epithelial cultures,134, 135 can be maintained for several weeks, and therefore allow for detection of the epigenetic changes that occur during extended stimulation.
CHALLENGES IN USING ORGANOIDS TO STUDY IBD
The clinical applications and future perspectives of human organoids are very encouraging; however, they largely depend on the optimization of a few technical aspects. Growth conditions need to be further improved and standardized. Attempts in this direction include the replacement of Wnt3a-conditioned medium with commercial alternatives136 or the use of synthetic extracellular matrices, including hydrogel and collagen, instead of nonstandardized mouse sarcoma-derived Matrigel.137
Another source of variability and potential low yields when culturing organoids is the use of tissue derived from actively inflamed intestinal areas. Due to the loss or erosion of the epithelial layer (especially in UC), the number and quality of intestinal crypts may be too low to support the growth of sufficient organoids for further experiments. Using tissue from involved segments with mild inflammation or in remission can, in our experience, help solve this problem.
The establishment of co-cultures using lamina propria cells and either spheroids or epithelial monolayers is also a technically challenging endeavor that many investigators are trying to tackle. Indeed, ASC-derived cultures are purely epithelial and do not provide the mesenchymal scaffold required to sustain the proper functional development of lamina propria cell types. In this sense, PSC-derived cultures offer a more physiologically accurate model for studying the high complexity of mucosal interactions, as it has been recently demonstrated in PCS-derived epithelial organoids containing both mesenchyme and functional enteric nervous cells.138
Finally, the development of a reliable model of microbiota–epithelium interactions also presents some challenges. Despite the fact that, ideally, one could isolate and culture whole gut microbial communities from human stool,139 the primarily anaerobic nature of gut microbiota makes its co-culture with aerobic cells a significant hurdle yet to be overcome. In addition to technical drawbacks, another key aspect to consider when using organoid cultures in translational medicine, as with any other primary culture, is the complex and biologically heterogeneous nature of IBD.124, 140, 141 The screening of large cohorts of organoid samples based on the clinical subphenotypes of patients combined with the use of new high-throughput microfluidics technologies142 will be required to effectively reduce these technical and biological biases.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Available therapeutic strategies in IBD aim to induce remission by suppressing the inflammatory response. However, current treatments fail in a significant percentage of patients.143 This strongly underscores the need to identify new therapeutic targets beyond pure immune suppression.
The intestinal epithelium has a crucial role in preserving tissue homeostasis and driving regeneration by interacting, responding, and controlling both microbial and lamina propria components. Moreover, epithelial cells act as amplifiers of the inflammatory cascade by responding to (via receptor expression) and secreting key inflammatory molecules. None of the currently available therapies specifically target the epithelial lining, although some of them can directly or indirectly affect it (eg, corticosteroids, 5-ASA, cyclosporine144, 145).
Whether organoids are utilized to obtain a better understanding of the individual disease pathogenesis and pathophysiology to evaluate the mechanistic actions underlying currently available treatments or to assess new therapeutic options, this system presents unique advantages and opportunities in drug development and personalization, and in toxicity and efficacy evaluations.62, 70
In addition, as discussed throughout this review, the introduction of a human ASC-derived intestinal organoid model could help accelerate research in IBD by providing an ideal compromise between human transformed cell lines and animal models.
By mimicking the tissue of origin, organoid cultures provide a reductionist approach for studying patient-specific epithelial phenotypes and functions while also potentially supporting interactions with other cellular and microbial components. Moreover, organoid cultures have been shown to remain stable after freezing and thawing, a feature that has aided the development of living biobanks of patient-derived organoids.146
In conclusion, despite the still limited number of published studies involving the use of human organoid cultures in investigating IBD physiopathology, epithelial ASC-derived organoid cultures represent a very promising tool for modeling IBD and personalizing medicine. Their potential arises from the fact that they maintain site- and patient-specific characteristics and therefore mimic cell behavior in an extremely versatile ex vivo model.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the members of the Salas lab and Julián Pulecio for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Rut Mora-Buch for contributing to the figure design. We are indebted to Joe Moore for editorial assistance.
Conflicts of interest: none declared.
Supported by: the Leona and Harry Helmsley Charitable Trust. (grant number 2015PG-IBD005) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 720905
REFERENCES
- 1. Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ. Crohn’s disease. Lancet. 2012;380:1590–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ordás I, Eckmann L, Talamini M, et al. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2012;380:1606–1619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Khor B, Gardet A, Xavier RJ. Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2011;474:307–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kaplan GG, Ng SC. Understanding and preventing the global increase of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:313–321.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Benchimol EI, Manuel DG, Guttmann A, et al. Changing age demographics of inflammatory bowel disease in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study of epidemiology trends. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:1761–1769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zeissig S, Bürgel N, Günzel D, et al. Changes in expression and distribution of claudin 2, 5 and 8 lead to discontinuous tight junctions and barrier dysfunction in active Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2007;56:61–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Strugala V, Dettmar PW, Pearson JP. Thickness and continuity of the adherent colonic mucus barrier in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:762–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. McCole DF. IBD candidate genes and intestinal barrier regulation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:1829–1849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Koch S, Nusrat A. The life and death of epithelia during inflammation: lessons learned from the gut. Annu Rev Pathol. 2012;7:35–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bruewer M, Luegering A, Kucharzik T, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines disrupt epithelial barrier function by apoptosis-independent mechanisms. J Immunol. 2003;171:6164–6172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Al-Sadi RM, Ma TY. IL-1beta causes an increase in intestinal epithelial tight junction permeability. J Immunol. 2007;178:4641–4649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Beck PL, Rosenberg IM, Xavier RJ, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta mediates intestinal healing and susceptibility to injury in vitro and in vivo through epithelial cells. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:597–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Paclik D, Lohse K, Wiedenmann B, et al. Galectin-2 and -4, but not galectin-1, promote intestinal epithelial wound healing in vitro through a TGF-beta-independent mechanism. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1366–1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rutgeerts P, Vermeire S, Van Assche G. Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: impossible ideal or therapeutic target?Gut. 2007;56:453–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Planell N, Lozano JJ, Mora-Buch R, et al. Transcriptional analysis of the intestinal mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis in remission reveals lasting epithelial cell alterations. Gut. 2013;62:967–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2001;48:526–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Spence JR, Mayhew CN, Rankin SA, et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro. Nature. 2011;470:105–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Jung P, Sato T, Merlos-Suárez A, et al. Isolation and in vitro expansion of human colonic stem cells. Nat Med. 2011;17:1225–1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sato T, Stange DE, Ferrante M, et al. Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett’s epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1762–1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459:262–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Múnera JO, Sundaram N, Rankin SA, et al. Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into colonic organoids via transient activation of BMP signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:51–64.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yui S, Nakamura T, Sato T, et al. Functional engraftment of colon epithelium expanded in vitro from a single adult Lgr5⁺ stem cell. Nat Med. 2012;18:618–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Grün D, Lyubimova A, Kester L, et al. Single-cell messenger RNA sequencing reveals rare intestinal cell types. Nature. 2015;525:251–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Forbester JL, Goulding D, Vallier L, et al. Interaction of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium with intestinal organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Infect Immun. 2015;83:2926–2934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Crespo M, Vilar E, Tsai SY, et al. Colonic organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells for modeling colorectal cancer and drug testing. Nat Med. 2017;23:878–884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Dekkers JF, Wiegerinck CL, de Jonge HR, et al. A functional CFTR assay using primary cystic fibrosis intestinal organoids. Nat Med. 2013;19:939–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ettayebi K, Crawford SE, Murakami K, et al. Replication of human noroviruses in stem cell-derived human enteroids. Science. 2016;353:1387–1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sachs N, Clevers H. Organoid cultures for the analysis of cancer phenotypes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014;24:68–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jung P, Sommer C, Barriga FM, et al. Isolation of human colon stem cells using surface expression of PTK7. Stem Cell Rep. 2015;5:979–987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ootani A, Li X, Sangiorgi E, et al. Sustained in vitro intestinal epithelial culture within a Wnt-dependent stem cell niche. Nat Med. 2009;15:701–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sharbati J, Hanisch C, Pieper R, et al. Small molecule and RNAi induced phenotype transition of expanded and primary colonic epithelial cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang F, Scoville D, He XC, et al. Isolation and characterization of intestinal stem cells based on surface marker combinations and colony-formation assay. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:383–95.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Stelzner M, Helmrath M, Dunn JC, et al. ; NIH Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium A nomenclature for intestinal in vitro cultures. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;302:G1359–G1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dotti I, Ferrer-Picón E, Planell N et al. Transcriptional analysis of intestinal epithelial organoid cultures derived from pediatric Crohn’s disease patients (oral communication). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65:S5. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Noben M, Verstockt B, de Bruyn M, et al. Epithelial organoid cultures from patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: a truly long-term model to study the molecular basis for inflammatory bowel disease?Gut. 2017;66:2193–2195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Middendorp S, Schneeberger K, Wiegerinck CL, et al. Adult stem cells in the small intestine are intrinsically programmed with their location-specific function. Stem Cells. 2014;32:1083–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Cramer JM, Thompson T, Geskin A, et al. Distinct human stem cell populations in small and large intestine. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0118792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kraiczy J, Nayak KM, Howell KJ et al. DNA methylation defines regional identity of human intestinal epithelial organoids and undergoes dynamic changes during development. Gut. 2017. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Behjati S, Huch M, van Boxtel R, et al. Genome sequencing of normal cells reveals developmental lineages and mutational processes. Nature. 2014;513:422–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Liang G, Zhang Y. Genetic and epigenetic variations in IPSCs: potential causes and implications for application. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13:149–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lesuffleur T, Porchet N, Aubert JP, et al. Differential expression of the human mucin genes MUC1 to MUC5 in relation to growth and differentiation of different mucus-secreting HT-29 cell subpopulations. J Cell Sci. 1993;106(Pt 3):771–783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Sambuy Y, De Angelis I, Ranaldi G, et al. The Caco-2 cell line as a model of the intestinal barrier: influence of cell and culture-related factors on Caco-2 cell functional characteristics. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2005;21:1–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Howitt MR, Lavoie S, Michaud M, et al. Tuft cells, taste-chemosensory cells, orchestrate parasite type 2 immunity in the gut. Science. 2016;351:1329–1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. de Lau W, Kujala P, Schneeberger K, et al. Peyer’s patch M cells derived from Lgr5(+) stem cells require SpiB and are induced by RankL in cultured “miniguts.” Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:3639–3647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Bellono NW, Bayrer JR, Leitch DB, et al. Enterochromaffin cells are gut chemosensors that couple to sensory neural pathways. Cell. 2017;170:185–198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Surawicz CM, Haggitt RC, Husseman M, et al. Mucosal biopsy diagnosis of colitis: acute self-limited colitis and idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:755–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Arijs I, De Hertogh G, Lemaire K, et al. Mucosal gene expression of antimicrobial peptides in inflammatory bowel disease before and after first infliximab treatment. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Moon C, VanDussen KL, Miyoshi H, et al. Development of a primary mouse intestinal epithelial cell monolayer culture system to evaluate factors that modulate IgA transcytosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:818–828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. VanDussen KL, Marinshaw JM, Shaikh N, et al. Development of an enhanced human gastrointestinal epithelial culture system to facilitate patient-based assays. Gut. 2015;64:911–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Wang Y, DiSalvo M, Gunasekara DB, et al. Self-renewing monolayer of primary colonic or rectal epithelial cells. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;4:165–182.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wang X, Yamamoto Y, Wilson LH, et al. Cloning and variation of ground state intestinal stem cells. Nature. 2015;522:173–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kozuka K, He Y, Koo-McCoy S, et al. Development and characterization of a human and mouse intestinal epithelial cell monolayer platform. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9:1976–1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Birchenough GM, Nyström EE, Johansson ME, et al. A sentinel goblet cell guards the colonic crypt by triggering Nlrp6-dependent Muc2 secretion. Science. 2016;352:1535–1542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Nozaki K, Mochizuki W, Matsumoto Y, et al. Co-culture with intestinal epithelial organoids allows efficient expansion and motility analysis of intraepithelial lymphocytes. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:206–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Pastuła A, Middelhoff M, Brandtner A, et al. Three-dimensional gastrointestinal organoid culture in combination with nerves or fibroblasts: a method to characterize the gastrointestinal stem cell niche. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:3710836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Noel G, Baetz NW, Staab JF, et al. A primary human macrophage-enteroid co-culture model to investigate mucosal gut physiology and host-pathogen interactions. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Drost J, van Jaarsveld RH, Ponsioen B, et al. Sequential cancer mutations in cultured human intestinal stem cells. Nature. 2015;521:43–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cortina C, Turon G, Stork D, et al. A genome editing approach to study cancer stem cells in human tumors. EMBO Mol Med. 2017;9:869–879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Schwank G, Koo BK, Sasselli V, et al. Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13:653–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Peck BC, Mah AT, Pitman WA, et al. Functional transcriptomics in diverse intestinal epithelial cell types reveals robust microrna sensitivity in intestinal stem cells to microbial status. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:2586–2600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Uhlig HH. Monogenic diseases associated with intestinal inflammation: implications for the understanding of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2013;62:1795–1805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. van de Wetering M, Francies HE, Francis JM et al. Prospective derivation of a living organoid biobank of colorectal cancer patients. Cell. 2015;161:933–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Zilbauer M, Kraiczy J. Epigenetics in gastrointestinal health and disease: spotlight on DNA methylation in the intestinal epithelium. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2017;88:35–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. de Lange KM, Moutsianas L, Lee JC, et al. Genome-wide association study implicates immune activation of multiple integrin genes in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Genet. 2017;49:256–261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Cadwell K, Liu JY, Brown SL, et al. A key role for autophagy and the autophagy gene Atg16l1 in mouse and human intestinal Paneth cells. Nature. 2008;456:259–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. VanDussen KL, Liu TC, Li D, et al. Genetic variants synthesize to produce Paneth cell phenotypes that define subtypes of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:200–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Avitzur Y, Guo C, Mastropaolo LA, et al. Mutations in tetratricopeptide repeat domain 7A result in a severe form of very early onset inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1028–1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Li Q, Lee CH, Peters LA, et al. Variants in TRIM22 that affect NOD2 signaling are associated with very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1196–1207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Blaydon DC, Biancheri P, Di WL, et al. Inflammatory skin and bowel disease linked to ADAM17 deletion. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1502–1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Dekkers JF, Berkers G, Kruisselbrink E, et al. Characterizing responses to CFTR-modulating drugs using rectal organoids derived from subjects with cystic fibrosis. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:344ra84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Gonneaud A, Asselin C, Boudreau F, et al. Phenotypic analysis of organoids by proteomics. Proteomics. 2017;17:1700023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Browne AW, Arnesano C, Harutyunyan N, et al. Structural and functional characterization of human stem-cell-derived retinal organoids by live imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:3311–3318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Luo C, Lancaster MA, Castanon R, et al. Cerebral organoids recapitulate epigenomic signatures of the human fetal brain. Cell Rep. 2016;17:3369–3384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Shi Y, Inoue H, Wu JC, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:115–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Blokzijl F, de Ligt J, Jager M, et al. Tissue-specific mutation accumulation in human adult stem cells during life. Nature. 2016;538:260–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Senger S, Ingano L, Freire R, et al. Human fetal-derived enterospheres provide insights on intestinal development and a novel model to study necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;5:549–568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Howell KJ, Kraiczy J, Nayak KM, et al. DNA methylation and transcription patterns in intestinal epithelial cells from pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases differentiate disease subtypes and associate with outcome. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:585–598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Roda G, Sartini A, Zambon E, et al. Intestinal epithelial cells in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4264–4271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Murthy A, Li Y, Peng I, et al. A Crohn’s disease variant in Atg16l1 enhances its degradation by caspase 3. Nature. 2014;506:456–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Farin HF, Karthaus WR, Kujala P, et al. Paneth cell extrusion and release of antimicrobial products is directly controlled by immune cell-derived IFN-γ. J Exp Med. 2014;211:1393–1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Grabinger T, Luks L, Kostadinova F, et al. Ex vivo culture of intestinal crypt organoids as a model system for assessing cell death induction in intestinal epithelial cells and enteropathy. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Nowarski R, Jackson R, Gagliani N, et al. Epithelial IL-18 equilibrium controls barrier function in colitis. Cell. 2015;163:1444–1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Pascal V, Pozuelo M, Borruel N, et al. A microbial signature for Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2017;66:813–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Park JH, Kotani T, Konno T, et al. Promotion of intestinal epithelial cell turnover by commensal bacteria: role of short-chain fatty acids. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Lukovac S, Belzer C, Pellis L et al. Differential modulation by Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii of host peripheral lipid metabolism and histone acetylation in mouse gut organoids. MBio. 2014;5:e01438–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Kaiko GE, Ryu SH, Koues OI, et al. The colonic crypt protects stem cells from microbiota-derived metabolites. Cell. 2016;165:1708–1720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Canani RB, Costanzo MD, Leone L, et al. Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1519–1528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Leslie JL, Huang S, Opp JS, et al. Persistence and toxin production by Clostridium difficile within human intestinal organoids result in disruption of epithelial paracellular barrier function. Infect Immun. 2015;83:138–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Karve SS, Pradhan S, Ward DV, et al. Intestinal organoids model human responses to infection by commensal and Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. In J, Foulke-Abel J, Zachos NC, et al. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli reduce mucus and intermicrovillar bridges in human stem cell-derived colonoids. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2:48–62.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Wehkamp J, Koslowski M, Wang G, et al. Barrier dysfunction due to distinct defensin deficiencies in small intestinal and colonic Crohn’s disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2008;1(Suppl 1):S67–S74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Larsson JM, Karlsson H, Crespo JG, et al. Altered O-glycosylation profile of MUC2 mucin occurs in active ulcerative colitis and is associated with increased inflammation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:2299–2307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Mirsepasi-Lauridsen HC, Du Z, Struve C, et al. Secretion of alpha-hemolysin by Escherichia coli disrupts tight junctions in ulcerative colitis patients. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016;7:e149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Zhang WX, Ma CY, Zhang JG, et al. Effects of cytomegalovirus infection on the prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease patients. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12:3287–3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Cadwell K, Patel KK, Maloney NS, et al. Virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction determines Crohn’s disease gene atg16l1 phenotypes in intestine. Cell. 2010;141:1135–1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Koo BK, Stange DE, Sato T, et al. Controlled gene expression in primary Lgr5 organoid cultures. Nat Methods. 2011;9:81–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Takahashi Y, Sato S, Kurashima Y et al. Reciprocal inflammatory signaling between intestinal epithelial cells and adipocytes in the absence of immune cells. EBioMedicine. 2017;23:34–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Coope A, Pascoal LB, da Silva FAR, et al. Transcriptional and molecular pathways activated in mesenteric adipose tissue and intestinal mucosa of Crohn’s disease patients. Int J Inflam. 2017;2017:7646859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Ohri N, Gerich M, Fennimore B, et al. Altered colonic intraepithelial lymphocyte composition and function in Crohn’s disease. J Immunol. 2016;196 (1 Supplement) 54.10 [Google Scholar]
- 100. Rogler G. Resolution of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:521–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Stzepourginski I, Nigro G, Jacob JM, et al. CD34+ mesenchymal cells are a major component of the intestinal stem cells niche at homeostasis and after injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E506–E513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Seno H, Miyoshi H, Brown SL, et al. Efficient colonic mucosal wound repair requires Trem2 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:256–261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Sturm A, Dignass AU. Epithelial restitution and wound healing in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:348–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Westphalen CB, Asfaha S, Hayakawa Y, et al. Long-lived intestinal tuft cells serve as colon cancer-initiating cells. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:1283–1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Villanacci V, Bassotti G, Nascimbeni R, et al. Enteric nervous system abnormalities in inflammatory bowel diseases. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:1009–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Miyoshi H, VanDussen KL, Malvin NP, et al. Prostaglandin E2 promotes intestinal repair through an adaptive cellular response of the epithelium. EMBO J. 2017;36:5–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Chen Y, Zhao Z, Chen Y, et al. An epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-inducing potential of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in colon cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Lindemans CA, Calafiore M, Mertelsmann AM, et al. Interleukin-22 promotes intestinal-stem-cell-mediated epithelial regeneration. Nature. 2015;528:560–564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Taniguchi K, Wu LW, Grivennikov SI, et al. A gp130-src-YAP module links inflammation to epithelial regeneration. Nature. 2015;519:57–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Mahapatro M, Foersch S, Hefele M, et al. Programming of intestinal epithelial differentiation by IL-33 derived from pericryptal fibroblasts in response to systemic infection. Cell Rep. 2016;15:1743–1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. van Es JH, Sato T, van de Wetering M, et al. Dll1+ secretory progenitor cells revert to stem cells upon crypt damage. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:1099–1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Miyoshi H, Ajima R, Luo CT, et al. Wnt5a potentiates TGF-β signaling to promote colonic crypt regeneration after tissue injury. Science. 2012;338:108–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Lee Y, Choo J, Kim SJ, et al. Analysis of endogenous lipids during intestinal wound healing. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0183028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Aggarwal S, Ahuja V, Paul J. Attenuated GABAergic signaling in intestinal epithelium contributes to pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:2768–2779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Lanis JM, Alexeev EE, Curtis VF, et al. Tryptophan metabolite activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates IL-10 receptor expression on intestinal epithelia. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10:1133–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Vivinus-Nébot M, Frin-Mathy G, Bzioueche H, et al. Functional bowel symptoms in quiescent inflammatory bowel diseases: role of epithelial barrier disruption and low-grade inflammation. Gut. 2014;63:744–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Vancamelbeke M, Vanuytsel T, Farré R, et al. Genetic and transcriptomic bases of intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23:1718–1729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Mora-Buch R, Dotti I, Planell N, et al. Epithelial IL-1R2 acts as a homeostatic regulator during remission of ulcerative colitis. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9:950–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Dotti I, Mora-Buch R, Ferrer-Picón E, et al. Alterations in the epithelial stem cell compartment could contribute to permanent changes in the mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2017;66:2069–2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Hibiya S, Tsuchiya K, Hayashi R, et al. Long-term inflammation transforms intestinal epithelial cells of colonic organoids. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:621–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Kim ER, Chang DK. Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: the risk, pathogenesis, prevention and diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9872–9881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Bettenworth D, Rieder F. Pathogenesis of intestinal fibrosis in inflammatory bowel disease and perspectives for therapeutic implication. Dig Dis. 2017;35:25–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Hahn S, Nam MO, Noh JH, et al. Organoid-based epithelial to mesenchymal transition (OEMT) model: from an intestinal fibrosis perspective. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Weiser M, Simon JM, Kochar B, et al. Molecular classification of Crohn’s disease reveals two clinically relevant subtypes. Gut. 2018;67:36–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Haberman Y, Tickle TL, Dexheimer PJ, et al. Pediatric Crohn disease patients exhibit specific ileal transcriptome and microbiome signature. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:3617–3633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Cleynen I, Boucher G, Jostins L, et al. ; International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium Inherited determinants of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis phenotypes: a genetic association study. Lancet. 2016;387:156–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Ventham NT, Kennedy NA, Nimmo ER, et al. Beyond gene discovery in inflammatory bowel disease: the emerging role of epigenetics. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:293–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Cooke J, Zhang H, Greger L, et al. Mucosal genome-wide methylation changes in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:2128–2137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Mirza AH, Berthelsen CH, Seemann SE, et al. Transcriptomic landscape of lncrnas in inflammatory bowel disease. Genome Med. 2015;7:39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Kraiczy J, Nayak K, Ross A, et al. Assessing DNA methylation in the developing human intestinal epithelium: potential link to inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9:647–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Barnicle A, Seoighe C, Greally JM, et al. Inflammation-associated DNA methylation patterns in epithelium of ulcerative colitis. Epigenetics. 2017;12:591–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. McKenna LB, Schug J, Vourekas A, et al. Micrornas control intestinal epithelial differentiation, architecture, and barrier function. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1654–1664, 1664.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Yu DH, Gadkari M, Zhou Q, et al. Postnatal epigenetic regulation of intestinal stem cells requires DNA methylation and is guided by the microbiome. Genome Biol. 2015;16:211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Booth C, O’Shea JA, Potten CS. Maintenance of functional stem cells in isolated and cultured adult intestinal epithelium. Exp Cell Res. 1999;249:359–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Dame MK, Jiang Y, Appelman HD, et al. Human colonic crypts in culture: segregation of immunochemical markers in normal versus adenoma-derived. Lab Invest. 2014;94:222–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Yin X, Farin HF, van Es JH, et al. Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny. Nat Methods. 2014;11: 106–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Gjorevski N, Sachs N, Manfrin A, et al. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature. 2016;539:560–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Workman MJ, Mahe MM, Trisno S, et al. Engineered human pluripotent-stem-cell-derived intestinal tissues with a functional enteric nervous system. Nat Med. 2017;23:49–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Browne HP, Forster SC, Anonye BO, et al. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature. 2016;533:543–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, et al. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut. 2006;55:749–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, et al. ; International IBD Genetics Consortium (IIBDGC) Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012;491:119–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Gracz AD, Williamson IA, Roche KC, et al. A high-throughput platform for stem cell niche co-cultures and downstream gene expression analysis. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:340–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, et al. ; SONIC Study Group Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1383–1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Lorén V, Cabré E, Ojanguren I, et al. Interleukin-10 enhances the intestinal epithelial barrier in the presence of corticosteroids through p38 MAPK activity in Caco-2 monolayers: a possible mechanism for steroid responsiveness in ulcerative colitis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Satoh Y, Ishiguro Y, Sakuraba H, et al. Cyclosporine regulates intestinal epithelial apoptosis via TGF-beta-related signaling. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;297:G514–G519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Sachs N, de Ligt J, Kopper O, et al. A living biobank of breast cancer organoids captures disease heterogeneity. Cell. 2018;172:373–386.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

