Skip to main content
Disease Models & Mechanisms logoLink to Disease Models & Mechanisms
. 2018 Nov 9;11(11):dmm035709. doi: 10.1242/dmm.035709

Modelling brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease in Caenorhabditis elegans

Alexander T Young 1, Kien N Ly 1,*, Callum Wilson 2, Klaus Lehnert 1, Russell G Snell 1, Suzanne J Reid 1, Jessie C Jacobsen 1
PMCID: PMC6262812  PMID: 30266839

ABSTRACT

Brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease is a rare disease caused by autosomal recessive mutations in the SLC18A2 gene, which encodes the VMAT2 protein. VMAT2 is a membrane protein responsible for vesicular transport of monoamines, and its disruption negatively affects neurotransmission. This results in a severe neurodevelopmental disorder affecting motor skills and development, and causes muscular hypotonia. The condition was initially described in a consanguineous Saudi Arabian family with affected siblings homozygous for a P387L mutation. We subsequently found a second mutation in a New Zealand family (homozygous P237H), which was later also identified in an Iraqi family. Pramipexole has been shown to have some therapeutic benefit. Transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans were developed to model the P237H and P387L mutations. Investigations into dopamine- and serotonin-related C. elegans phenotypes, including pharyngeal pumping and grazing, showed that both mutations cause significant impairment of these processes when compared with a non-transgenic N2 strain and a transgenic containing the wild-type human SLC18A2 gene. Preliminary experiments investigating the therapeutic effects of serotonin and pramipexole demonstrated that serotonin could successfully restore the pharyngeal pumping phenotype. These analyses provide further support for the role of these mutations in this disease.

KEY WORDS: VMAT, Cat-1, Dopamine-serotonin transport disease, Caenorhabditis elegans, Animal model


Summary: The first Caenorhabditis elegans model to study brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease, demonstrating impairment of pharyngeal pumping and grazing phenotypes.

INTRODUCTION

Brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease is a rare neurological disease caused by mutations in the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2; encoded by SLC18A2), an H+ ATPase antiporter required for transport of neurotransmitters into presynaptic vesicles. This disease was first reported in 2013, in eight members of a consanguineous Saudi Arabian family who carry an autosomal recessive mutation in SLC18A2 (OMIM: 193001, Refseq NM_003054.4; P387L, c.1160C>T) (Rilstone et al., 2013). Two further cases harbouring homozygous recessive mutations have since been reported in our previously described New Zealand family (P237H, c. 710C>A) (Jacobsen et al., 2016) and an Iraqi family with the same mutation (Rath et al., 2017). The two mutations identified for this disorder are in evolutionarily conserved positions and lie within transmembrane domains 5 and 10 of VMAT2, respectively.

Affected individuals display truncal hypotonia and have impaired motor skills. Other symptoms include lack of head control, uncontrolled eye movements, abnormal posturing, tremor, dysdiadochokinesia, dysarthria, dystonia and parkinsonism, as well as oropharyngeal and nasal secretions, extreme sweating, fatigue, poor distal circulation, sleep disruptions and hypernasal speech. However, there is some diversity in the phenotypic spectrum of the disease across the three published cases (Jacobsen et al., 2016; Rath et al., 2017; Rilstone et al., 2013). Remarkably, all three reports describe various degrees of improvement after treatment with the dopamine agonist pramipexole [a dopamine D2/D3 receptor preferring agonist (Kvermo et al., 2006)], including improved parkinsonism, gaining control of eye movement, improved fine motor skills, improved learning ability and gaining the ability to walk (Rath et al., 2017; Rilstone et al., 2013). Interestingly, cases treated at an earlier age responded better to pramipexole; for example, the therapeutic improvement in the New Zealand case (at age 14) was not as remarkable as the Iraqi case (at age 7) despite harbouring the same mutation (Jacobsen et al., 2016). Interestingly, patients treated with the dopamine precursor L-DOPA demonstrated worsening of symptoms (Jacobsen et al., 2016; Rilstone et al., 2013).

To investigate the effects of the original P387L mutation, Rilstone et al. expressed wild-type (WT) and mutant VMAT2 in COS-7 cells (Rilstone et al., 2013). The mutant VMAT2 demonstrated reduced serotonin signalling, but glycosylation of the protein was not affected, indicative of normal protein processing. Furthermore, serotonin signalling in mutant VMAT2 was slightly higher than WT VMAT2 inhibited with reserpine (a VMAT2 blocker), suggesting that the mutation does not result in complete loss of function (Rilstone et al., 2013).

To expand on the functional work by Rilstone et al. and support the role of the P237H mutation in disease, we developed Caenorhabditis elegans models of brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease. Caenorhabditis elegans is a nematode that is commonly used as a simple multicellular model of human diseases. Caenorhabditis elegans exist predominantly as female hermaphrodites with very few males, and can develop in 3 days from eggs to adults. Self-fertilising adults can produce about 300 progeny, enabling access to very large populations and making them a simple, cost-effective option for studying the biology of neuronal signalling. Caenorhabditis elegans have a VMAT homologue, cat-1, which has 49% amino acid sequence similarity to human VMAT2, with higher regions of conservation in the transmembrane domains where the mutations reside. cat-1 is located on the X chromosome, and is expressed in all dopamine- and serotonin-containing cells in C. elegans. Like human VMAT2, C. elegans VMAT is responsible for the transport of dopamine and serotonin into synaptic vesicles (Duerr et al., 1999). Caenorhabditis elegans lacking VMAT are viable and grow well, but are deficient for dopamine- and serotonin-associated behaviours, suggesting that neurotransmitter function is dependent on synaptic vesicle loading (Duerr et al., 1999). We subsequently generated three transgenic lines – cat-1(−)-huVMAT2(+), cat-1(−)-huVMAT2(P387L) and cat-1(−)-huVMAT2(P237H) – to assess the impact of these mutations on VMAT2 function.

RESULTS

Transgenic strain development

Three transgenic C. elegans lines were successfully generated using the MosSCI method: cat-1(−)-huVMAT2(+), which is homozygous for the WT human SLC18A2 gene; cat-1(−)-huVMAT2(P237H), carrying the P237H (c.710C>A) human mutation; and cat-1(−)-huVMAT2(P387L), carrying the P387L (c.1160C>T) human mutation. The genotype was confirmed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Fig. 1C), and the transgenic status of the final strains was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1A). Successful transcription of the transgene was verified using reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR; Fig. 1B). The crossing method only selected for cat-1 knockouts, which was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. S2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Confirmation of transgenics. (A) Sanger traces confirming that the mutations are present in the transgenes integrated into the C. elegans strains. Mutation sites are indicated by red boxes. (B) Confirmation of gene expression by RT-PCR (primers seqhVMATf1 and seqhVMATr1). RT negative controls contained no reverse transcriptase. P237H (NZ), P387L (SA), WT. (C) Prior to Sanger sequencing, C. elegans were genotyped by PCR. Each C. elegans required 2 wells for assessment: the first well contains a positive control (SSU18A+SSU26R ∼950 bp) and a test for the transgene (primers unc5402 and seqSNB01, 2657 bp). Primers NM3884 and NM3880, which flank the integration site, were used to determine insertion of the construct. The second well for each sample only show a product (2945 bp) if one chromosome does not have the construct inserted, and no band if the C. elegans is homozygous. The top series of bands are all from C. elegans of a single parent, deemed heterozygous, as all possible genotype combinations are represented. The lower bands are from a homozygous parent, as all C. elegans show presence of the transgene, and a copy on each chromosome. Primer sequences are available in Table S3. TG, transgene.

The transgenic C. elegans lines were subsequently assessed for dopamine- and serotonin-dependent behaviours.

Phenotyping

Grazing

Grazing behaviour is a well-established phenotype in C. elegans, and is known to be dependent on both dopamine and serotonin (Chase and Koelle, 2007). It was therefore used to assess the effect of both mutations on dopamine and serotonin signalling.

Linear model analysis revealed significant effects of strain (ANOVA P<0.0001, F-ratio 28.7) and treatment (ANOVA P<0.0001, F-ratio 29.7) on grazing. There was no effect of trial (ANOVA P=0.802, F-ratio 0.22; trials were performed on three separate occasions) on grazing. Post-hoc analysis of the SLC18A2 genotype revealed significant effects on grazing (Fig. 2 and Table S1), with the cat-1 knockout strain (CB1111) having a significantly reduced grazing time (mean 11.8 s, s.e.m. 1.03 s) compared to the N2 strain (mean 40.8 s, s.e.m. 1.57 s, Tukey HSD P<0.0001). This is indicative of reduced food recognition in the absence of VMAT. Importantly, there was no significant difference in grazing time between the WT human SLC18A2 transgenic (mean 41.3, s.e.m. 1.70 s; Tukey HSD P=0.98) and the N2 C. elegans, indicating that transgenic expression of human SLC18A2 at the ttTi5605 locus can restore the grazing deficit seen in CB1111 cat-1 knockout C. elegans. Comparisons between the WT strain and the P237H transgenic (mean 13.3 s, s.e.m. 1.02 s, Tukey HSD P<0.0001) and P387L transgenic (mean 11.6 s, s.e.m. 0.90 s, Tukey HSD P<0.0001) demonstrated that both mutations cause significant grazing impairment, reducing it to levels comparable with the cat-1 knockout. Pairwise comparisons between untreated strains are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Grazing results for each group. Bars represent the time taken (seconds) to move onto the bacterial lawn, either with no drug treatment, 5 mM pramipexole (Pra) or 5 mM serotonin (Ser). N≥30 for each group. Error bars: s.e.m. Asterisks represent P<0.0001.

Table 1.

Pairwise comparisons of grazing data (differences in mean duration of grazing time in seconds) for untreated strains

graphic file with name dmm-11-035709-i1.jpg

To provide some preliminary insight into the effects of exogenous serotonin and pramipexole on C. elegans VMAT function, the grazing phenotype was evaluated in the presence of either 5 mM serotonin or 5 mM pramipexole. Treatment with either compound significantly improved grazing in the P237H, P387L and CB1111 strains (Tukey HSD P<0.0001 for each treatment across all three strains, Table 2). While serotonin consistently showed a greater effect than pramipexole (Fig. 2), this difference was not significant (Tukey HSD P>0.1) for any strain. There was no significant treatment effect for either drug on either of the control strains.

Table 2.

Comparison of grazing data (differences in mean duration of grazing time in seconds) for each strain, when treated with either pramipexole or serotonin, compared to no treatment

graphic file with name dmm-11-035709-i2.jpg

Pharyngeal pumping

Pharyngeal pumping in C. elegans is another well-defined phenotype, dependent on serotonin signalling, and was used to investigate serotonin signalling in these models (Fig. 3 and Table S2).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Pharyngeal pumping results from each group. N≥90 for each test without drugs. N=30 for each drug treatment group. Bars represent the average number of pharyngeal pumps, either with no drug treatment, 5 mM pramipexole (pra) or 5 mM serotonin (ser). Error bars: s.e.m. Asterisks represent significant differences (P<0.0001). For simplicity, significance for all untreated strain comparisons are not shown; all were significantly different (Tukey HSD P-value less than 0.003).

Linear model analysis revealed significant effects of strain (ANOVA P<0.0001, F-ratio 132.2) and treatment (ANOVA P<0.0001, F-ratio 26.1) on pharyngeal pumping. There was no effect of trial (ANOVA P=0.757, F-ratio 0.27; trials were performed on three separate occasions) on grazing. Post-hoc analysis of the SLC18A2 genotype revealed that all pairwise comparisons between strains were significantly altered (Tukey HSD P<0.005, Table 3). N2 had the greatest number of pumps per minute (mean 269, s.e.m. 2.33), and the CB1111 strain had the least (mean 177, s.e.m. 3.04). Transgenic expression of WT human SLC18A2 (mean 240, s.e.m. 2.34) partially restored the deficit seen in CB1111 (Tukey HSD P<0.0001), but the value remained significantly lower (P<0.0001) than levels observed in the N2 strain. The mutant VMAT2 variants also displayed significantly more pumps (P237H mean 198, s.e.m. 3.2; P387L mean 209, s.e.m. 2.48), when compared to the CB1111 knockout strain (Tukey HSD P<0.0001 for both comparisons, Table 3). However, pumping in both mutation-carrying strains was significantly less than that observed in the WT C. elegans, where 69% of the difference between CB1111 and N2 levels was restored (Tukey HSD P<0.0001), while only a 23.1% and 34.4% rescue was achieved for the P237H and P387L strains, respectively.

Table 3.

Pairwise Tukey HSD tests of pharyngeal pumping data (differences in mean pumping rate per minute) for untreated strains

graphic file with name dmm-11-035709-i3.jpg

When the pharyngeal pumping phenotype was re-assessed in the presence of either 5 mM pramipexole or serotonin (Table 4), we found that serotonin restored the mean number of pumps per minute in the CB1111 (mean 238, s.e.m. 3.4), P387L (mean 234, s.e.m. 3.01) and P237H (mean 233, s.e.m. 3.03) strains (P<0.0001 for all strains when compared to no drug treatment) to levels close to those seen in the WT transgenic (with or without serotonin) (Tukey HSD P<0.003). In addition, a more rhythmic, consistent pumping action (when compared to the untreated knockout or mutation-carrying strains) was observed with serotonin. This was not quantified, and requires further validation. Only the P387L strain significantly increased in pumping rate after addition of pramipexole (Tukey HSD P=0.0027), demonstrating a differentiated effect from the P237H mutation (Tukey HSD P=0.4712). Interestingly, pumping rate was adversely affected following treatment with both pramipexole and serotonin in the N2 strain (Table 4).

Table 4.

Comparison of pharyngeal pumping data (differences in mean pumping rate) for each strain, when treated with either pramipexole or serotonin, compared to no treatment

graphic file with name dmm-11-035709-i4.jpg

DISCUSSION

We have utilised C. elegans as a model to validate the role of two known SLC18A2 mutations (P237H and P387L) in brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease. While previous functional investigations of the P387L mutation revealed a severe reduction, but not complete loss, in VMAT2 transport ability (Rilstone et al., 2013), there has been no research into the consequence of the P237H mutation that has been observed in both the New Zealand and Iraqi families. We present here the first animal models of the disease. Three full-length cDNA transgenic models were developed (one for each mutation and WT human SLC18A2 gene), and the impact of both mutations on monoamine neurotransmitter transport was assessed and compared to a previously established C. elegans homologue (cat-1) knockout model and a WT N2 strain.

It is known that VMAT2 plays an important role in dopamine and serotonin signalling; therefore, phenotypes dependent on these neurotransmitters [grazing and pharyngeal pumping (Loer and Kenyon, 1993; Sawin et al., 2000)] were evaluated in the models to provide insight into the relative function of the mutations. Results from both assays demonstrated a significant impairment in both strains carrying the human mutations, which was comparable to that of the cat-1 knockout (CB1111). Interestingly, comparisons of the phenotypic function of the strains carrying the P237H and P387L variants suggest that the P237H mutation may have a more significant impact on protein function, which aligns with the comparative phenotypic description of the cases (Jacobsen et al., 2016; Rath et al., 2017; Rilstone et al., 2013). Further functional work assessing the impact of these mutations on protein function is required to confirm their relative effects.

The grazing assay, designed to assess food recognition by measuring the time taken for the length of the C. elegans to move onto the bacterial lawn (and indicative of dopamine and serotonin signalling), demonstrated a deficit in the ability to recognise food in the P237H (mean 13.3 s) and P387L (mean 11.6 s) C. elegans strains, despite the WT SLC18A2 transgenic displaying normal food recognition (mean 41.3 s).

The pharyngeal pumping experiments revealed the mean pumping rate of the P237H and P387L strain to be 32% and 48% of the WT strain, respectively. It is important to consider that, although the CB1111 strain has no functional VMAT gene, the pharynx in these animals still pumps, suggesting that this is not entirely dependent on VMAT pathways. Cell culture experiments by Rilstone et al. evaluating serotonin uptake of vesicles containing mutant VMAT2 (P387L mutation) showed that the level of uptake was less than 5 pmol/mg over 10 min, compared to an uptake level of 25∼30 pmol/mg in WT VMAT2-containing vesicles (Rilstone et al., 2013). This demonstrated the level of neurotransmitter transport in the P387L mutant protein to be approximately 16-20% of normal function (compared to the 48% rescue of the pharyngeal pumping phenotype in the assay presented here). Utilising both data sets, one may postulate that a small percent of transport can provide a relatively greater level of rescue (i.e. 20% of normal transport results in a 48% rescue of phenotype). However, any conclusions from the phenotyping assays should only point to relative and not absolute effects on neurotransmitter transport. The data from the pharyngeal pumping assays presented here provide evidence that both mutations result in a very low level of protein function when compared to the WT VMAT2 protein, which is consistent with that reported by Rilstone et al.

Interestingly, grazing and phenotypic pumping were not fully restored to levels seen in N2 C. elegans, despite showing significant improvement relative to the CB1111 knockout strain. This is perhaps not unexpected, given that the proteins are only 49% similar (Duerr et al., 1999). It would be interesting to assess the effects of the mutations at the equivalent positions in cat-1.

Preliminary analysis of the therapeutic benefits of serotonin and pramipexole were assessed in these models using the established grazing and pharyngeal pumping phenotypes. Serotonin administration was successful in restoring pumping rates in the P237H, P387L and CB1111 strains, improving both the frequency (number per minute) and function (rhythmic cadence). Furthermore, serotonin administration successfully restored grazing deficits seen in the P237H, P387L and CB1111 strains. Previous work has identified successful recovery of serotonin signalling in CB1111 C. elegans (Loer and Kenyon, 1993), supporting this observation. The addition of pramipexole appeared to partially restore the pharyngeal pumping phenotype observed in the P387L C. elegans but not in the P237H or CB1111 strains, reflecting a difference in mutant protein function and suggesting that therapeutic success may be dependent on the location of the mutation. Additionally, the addition of pramipexole successfully restored grazing deficits in the P237H, P387L and CB1111 strains, providing evidence that pramipexole can rescue dopamine-dependent phenotypes in the C. elegans models.

Interestingly, the N2 strain displayed hyperactive movement when treated with either serotonin or pramipexole (fast backward movement, rapid twitches and increases in sporadic pumping), and were never observed to be stationary and eating. In comparison, the WT strain exhibited no adverse behaviours following drug treatment. Therefore, the improved pumping rate observed in the transgenic animals may not be caused directly by pramipexole, but indirectly via mechanisms that impact the grazing ability of C. elegans. Excess pramipexole may also result in over-stimulation of the C. elegans. Further experiments are required to determine dose effects of both serotonin and pramipexole across these strains, as well as the basal levels of these neurotransmitters and the affinity of C. elegans receptors for pramipexole.

A significant consideration from the case reports is that the response to treatment appears to have a lower impact in older children, as demonstrated by the greater improvement in younger patients following pramipexole treatment (Rilstone et al., 2013). Given that C. elegans has a life span of only a few weeks, it is hard to assess age-related effects of drug treatment and follow-up in a longer-living organism will be required. Interestingly, administration of L-DOPA to both cohorts of patients caused worsening of symptoms (Jacobsen et al., 2016; Rilstone et al., 2013). This may be due to L-DOPA-induced cytotoxicity, or apoptosis-induced effects of increased signalling on dopaminergic neurons (Jeon et al., 2010). It would be interesting to assess the effects of L-DOPA in these models.

Both the case reports and the C. elegans transgenics described here demonstrate that bypassing the need for vesicular transportation and directly targeting neurotransmitter receptors successfully alleviates some of the symptoms caused by the disease. Considering the potential therapeutic impacts for children harbouring mutations in the SLC18A2 gene, the importance of an early diagnosis to optimise treatment, prevent cell damage or death and increase quality of life is clear. Based on these C. elegans studies, it is possible that dual administration of pramipexole and serotonin (as 5-hydroxytryptophan) may be of benefit.

Conclusion

The C. elegans models described here are the first animal models developed for brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease, and provide insight into the relative biological impact of these mutations, which may ultimately help guide management and treatment options for this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Caenorhabditis elegans maintenance

Synchronised C. elegans populations were maintained on Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) on 35×10 mm agar Petri dishes in 15 or 20°C incubators, and were inspected daily to ensure that there was no overcrowding or contamination. Escherichia coli HB101 was used as a food source.

Development of transgenic lines

Transgenics were generated following the MosSCI method using the C. elegans strain EG6699 (locus ttTi5605, chromosome 2: 0.78, genomic position: II:8420158..8420158) (Frøkjaer-Jensen et al., 2012, 2014). The plasmid consisted of a Mos1 transposon containing SLC18A2 (full-length human cDNA) under a synaptobrevin (snb-1) promoter (expressed in C. elegans neurons and localised to synaptic regions, and used in the cat-1 knockout transgenic generated by Duerr et al., 1999), unc-119(+) and homologous sites (L and R) as shown in Fig. 4. Vectors were also constructed carrying both the P237H and P387L mutations within the human cDNA (Table 5). It is unclear whether all C. elegans neurons express cat-1; therefore, there could be a potential confounding effect if the human protein is expressed in neurons in which endogenous cat-1 is not expressed in the normal physiological state.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Linear schematic showing the PCR design to verify transgenic integration in C. elegans chromosome 2. PCR primer pairs used: left (unc5401+NM3880), left inner (unc5401+NM3887), middle (unc5402+seqSNB01), right inner (pSNB01+NM3888) and right (pSNB01+NM3884). R and L are homologous sites used for insertion into site ttTi5605 on chromosome 2. For a full plasmid map showing genes and primer locations, see Fig. S1.

Table 5.

Caenorhabditis elegans strains used for phenotyping experiments

graphic file with name dmm-11-035709-i5.jpg

Microinjection was performed using an Injectman NI 2 micromanipulator (Eppendorf) attached to a Leica inverted compound microscope. Caenorhabditis elegans were immobilised to slides using a 2% agarose solution. The plasmid DNA was purified using an Axygen maxiprep kit (50 ng/μl) and injected with pCFJ601 (100 ng/μl, transposase), pAM122 (10 ng/μl, peel-1 toxin), pGH8 (10 ng/μl, mCherry in neurons), pCFJ90 (2.5 ng/μl, mCherry in the pharynx) and pCFJ104 (5 ng/μl, mCherry in the body muscle). The injection cocktail was delivered at approximately 1000 psi until the mixture appeared to fill the gonad of the C. elegans.

Following microinjection, C. elegans were placed in recovery buffer (66 mM NaCl, 5 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 3 mM CaCl2, 3 mM MgCl2, 2.4 mM KCl and 4% glucose), and transferred to a seeded NGM plate and incubated at 25°C. After approximately 10 days, the plates containing the injected C. elegans were transferred to a 34°C incubator for 2 h, to activate expression of the toxic peel-1 gene.

Caenorhabditis elegans that survived the heat-shock treatment and displayed normal movement (successful incorporation of unc-119) were examined under a fluorescence microscope to identify any still carrying the extrachromosomal mCherry coding plasmids. Caenorhabditis elegans showing no signs of mCherry fluorescence were transferred to fresh NGM plates, as they had evidently lost the extrachromosomal arrays and the desired chromosomal integration had likely occurred. The selected C. elegans were propagated for several generations and bred to homozygosity (demonstrated by loss of the uncoordinated phenotype due to rescue of unc-119), and confirmed by DNA analysis using PCR to identify the presence of the transgene using primer pairs specified in Table 6 (primer sequences available in Table S3).

Table 6.

Primer pairs used to confirm successful integration of the plasmid into chromosome 2 of EG6699 C. elegans

graphic file with name dmm-11-035709-i6.jpg

The three resulting strains containing the transgene [huVMAT2(+), huVMAT2(P387L) and huVMAT2(P237H)] were crossbred with the CB1111 cat-1 knockout strain to establish lines homozygous for the transgenes. These final strains are designated as WT, P387L and P237H (Table 5). Homozygosity was confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing. The males used for crossing were created by exposure to ethanol, as previously described (Lyons and Hecht, 1997). Primers used for all genotyping assays are described in Table 6, Table S3 and graphically illustrated in Fig. 4.

The N2 and CB1111 strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC), which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).

Reverse transcription

RNA was extracted using a previously published single-worm method (Ly et al., 2015), and RT-PCR was used to determine successful transcription of the transgenes using the Maxima Reverse Transcription kit (ThermoFisher Scientific).

Phenotyping assays

Synchronised adult C. elegans were used for all experiments, and all strains were assessed in parallel across 3 days. Synchronised populations were achieved by placing adults on plates for several hours to lay eggs. Once several eggs had been laid, the adults were removed. The C. elegans were housed at 20°C prior to phenotyping, and assessed in a temperature-controlled room also at 20°C. Bacterial lawn thickness and dryness of the agar was visually inspected in all assays to ensure consistency. Preliminary phenotyping involved assessing pharyngeal pumping for serotonin signalling, and grazing behaviour for dopamine and serotonin signalling, as these phenotypes have been shown to be affected by these neurotransmitters (Chase and Koelle, 2007).

Grazing activity was measured by assessing the behaviour of C. elegans searching for food (bacterial lawn). To perform this assay, groups of C. elegans were transferred to a fresh agar plate containing many small bacterial lawns (<2 μl). After encountering the bacterial lawn, the time taken for a C. elegans to move fully onto the bacterial lawn (1 body length) was recorded. To control for increased movement due to transfer of C. elegans to a new plate, any recordings of individuals encountering the lawn within 1 min of plate transfer were excluded. This is a similar method to that applied by Duerr et al. in their investigation of monoamine-dependent behaviours (Duerr et al., 1999). To measure pharyngeal pumping rate, C. elegans were transferred to an NGM plate with a bacterial lawn and left for 10 min to acclimate. The rate was determined by focusing on the pharyngeal muscle in individual worms under a dissecting microscope and counting each individual pump over a 60 s period, and tracking the C. elegans as it moved freely about the plate, as described previously (Raizen et al., 2012).

Drug treatment

To assess treatment responses, serotonin (Sigma) or pramipexole (Sigma) were spread on top of agarose plates to a final concentration of 5 mM and given time to be absorbed. As soon as the solutions were absorbed into the agar (determined by visual inspection), the phenotyping assays were conducted.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the JMP statistical package (JMP® 11.2.0), in which the individual worms within each trial were treated as biological replicates. The effect of strain, treatment and trial were assessed using an ANOVA model because data from grazing and pharyngeal pumping trials approximated a normal distribution (determined by visual inspection and Shapiro-Wilks tests). Subsequently, post-hoc (all pairs Tukey HSD) analysis were performed and Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing was made.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary information
dmm-11-035709-s1.pdf (690.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kristine Boxen at the Auckland Science Analytical Services for Sanger sequencing services.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: K.L., R.G.S., S.J.R., J.C.J.; Methodology: A.T.Y., K.N.L., S.J.R.; Validation: K.L., S.J.R., J.C.J.; Formal analysis: A.T.Y., K.N.L., S.J.R.; Resources: C.W., J.C.J.; Writing - original draft: A.T.Y., K.N.L.; Writing - review & editing: A.T.Y., K.N.L., C.W., K.L., R.G.S., S.J.R., J.C.J.; Supervision: S.J.R., J.C.J.; Project administration: S.J.R., J.C.J.; Funding acquisition: J.C.J.

Funding

J.C.J. is supported by a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship from the New Zealand Government and administered by the Royal Society of New Zealand. The research was also funded by the School of Biological Sciences (The University of Auckland).

Supplementary information

Supplementary information available online at http://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.035709.supplemental

References

  1. Chase D. L. and Koelle M. R. (2007). Biogenic amine neurotransmitters in C. elegans. WormBook 1-15. 10.1895/wormbook.1.132.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Duerr J. S., Frisby D. L., Gaskin J., Duke A., Asermely K., Huddleston D., Eiden L. E. and Rand J. B. (1999). The cat-1 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans encodes a vesicular monoamine transporter required for specific monoamine dependent behaviours. J. Neurosci. 19, 72-84. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-01-00072.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frøkjaer-Jensen C., Davis M. W., Ailion M. and Jorgensen E. M. (2012). Improved Mos1-mediated transgenesis in C. elegans. Nat. Methods 9, 117-118. 10.1038/nmeth.1865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frøkjaer-Jensen C., Davis M. W., Sarov M., Taylor J., Flibotte S., LaBella M., Pozniakovsky A., Moerman D. G. and Jorgensen E. M. (2014). Random and targeted transgene insertion in Caenorhabditis elegans using a modified Mos1 transposon. Nat. Methods 11, 529-534. 10.1038/nmeth.2889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jacobsen J. C., Wilson C., Cunningham V., Glamuzina E., Prosser D. O., Love D. R., Burgess T., Taylor J., Swan B., Hill R. et al. (2016). Brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease presenting as a severe infantile hypotonic parkinsonian disorder. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 39, 305-308. 10.1007/s10545-015-9897-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jeon S.-M., Cheon S.-M., Bae H.-R., Kim J. W. and Kim S. U. (2010). Selective susceptibility of human dopaminergic neural stem cells to dopamine-induced apoptosis. Exp. Neurobiol. 19, 155-164. 10.5607/en.2010.19.3.155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kvermo T., Hartter S. and Burger E. (2006). A review of the receptor-binding and pharmacokinetic properties of dopamine agonists. Clin. Ther. 28, 1065-1078. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loer M. C. and Kenyon C. J. (1993). Serotonin-deficient mutants and male mating behavior in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 13, 5407-5417. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-12-05407.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ly K., Reid S. J. and Snell R. G. (2015). Rapid RNA analysis of individual Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods X 2, 59-63. 10.1016/j.mex.2015.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyons L. C. and Hecht R. M. (1997). Acute ethanol exposure induces nondisjunction of the X chromosome during spermatogenesis. Worm Breeders Gazette 14, 52. [Google Scholar]
  11. Raizen D., Song B. M., Trojanowski N. and You Y. J. (2012). Methods for measuring pharyngeal behaviors. WormBook 1-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rath M., Korenke G. C., Najm J., Hoffman G. F., Hagendorff A., Strom T. M. and Felbor U. (2017). Exome sequencing results in identification and treatment of brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 379, 296-297. 10.1016/j.jns.2017.06.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rilstone J. J., Alkhater R. A. and Minassian B. A. (2013). Brain dopamine-serotonin vesicular transport disease and its treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 543-550. 10.1056/NEJMoa1207281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sawin E. R., Ranganathan R. and Horvitz H. R. (2000). C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron 26, 619-631. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81199-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information
dmm-11-035709-s1.pdf (690.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Disease Models & Mechanisms are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists

RESOURCES