Abstract
Vesicular carriers transport proteins and lipids from one organelle to another, recognizing specific identifiers for the donor and acceptor membranes. Two important identifiers are phosphoinositides and GTP-bound GTPases, which provide well-defined but mutable labels. Phosphatidylinositol and its phosphorylated derivatives are present on the cytosolic faces of most cellular membranes1,2. Reversible phosphorylation of its headgroup produces seven distinct phosphoinositides. In endocytic traffic, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate marks the plasma membrane, and phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphateand phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate mark distinct endosomal compartments2,3. It is unknown what sequence of changes in lipid content confers on the vesicles their distinct identity at each intermediate step. Here we describe ‘coincidence-detecting’ sensors that selectively report the phosphoinositide composition of clathrin-associated structures, and the use of these sensors to follow the dynamics of phosphoinositide conversion during endocytosis. The membrane of an assembling coated pit, in equilibrium with the surrounding plasma membrane, contains phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate and a smaller amount of phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate.Closure of the vesicle interrupts free exchange with the plasma membrane. A substantial burst of phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate immediately after budding coincides with a burst of phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate, distinct from any later encounter with the phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate pool in early endosomes; phosphatidylinositol-3,4-biphosphate and the GTPase Rab5 then appear and remain as the uncoating vesicles mature into Rab5-positive endocytic intermediates. Our observations show that a cascade of molecular conversions, made possible by the separation of a vesicle from its parent membrane, can label membrane-traffic intermediates and determine their destinations.
To design the new sensors, we capitalized on the way in which auxilin and epsin associate with clathrin coats4–6. Auxilins (in mammalian cells, auxilin1 (Aux1) and auxilin2 or GAK) require both a clathrin-binding domain and a phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN)-like domain for effective recruitment to newly budded clathrin-coated vesicles4,7,8 (Extended Data Fig. 1a, Supplementary Video 1). Binding to clathrin depends on the geometry of the clathrin lattice9, and neither domain is effective on its own at normal intracellular concentrations. Epsin also has both clathrin-binding and lipid-binding domains5,6. We proposed previously that the auxilin PTEN-like domain interacts with a specific phosphoinositide in the coat-engulfed membrane and that auxilins are effectively coincidence detectors4. We have therefore prepared a series of sensors (Extended Data Figs 1–4) in which a phosphoinositide-binding domain of known specificity is combined with the Auxl (Fig. 1a, Extended Data Fig. 1j) or epsinl (Extended Data Fig. 4e) clathrin-binding domain and an enhanced GFP (EGFP) or mCherry fluorophore. We validated their properties as described in Extended Data Figs 1–4 and the Supplementary Discussion.
In most experiments, we followed recruitment of these sensors in gene-edited SUM159 cells expressing the clathrin light chain A joined to the fluorescent marker TagRFP (CLTA-TagRFP) (Extended Data Fig. 1b). Cells were imaged by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy, with illumination at an angle chosen to decrease sensitivity to sample depth but to increase sensitivity with respect to spinning-disk confocal fluorescence microscopy. We used a previously developed 2D-tracking computational framework for automated detection and tracking of the fluorescently tagged coated structures10. To follow the sensors on internal membranes, we used a lattice light-sheet microscope11 to visualize the full cellular volume.
The phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) fluorescent sensor EGFP-PH(PLCδ1)-Aux1 was present in all plasma membrane coated pits of CLTA-TagRFP+/+ cells (Fig. 1b, Extended Data Fig. 4a, Supplementary Video 2). Unlike intact Aux1, which appears in a burst immediately after scission of a coated vesicle from the plasma membrane (Extended Data Fig. 1a, Supplementary Video 1), the sensor accumulated in clathrin-coated pits as they formed, followed by a gradual loss coinciding with disassembly of the clathrin coat (Figs 1b, 2a). The sensor did not associate with any clathrin-coated structures in endosomal membranes or in the trans-Golgi network (Extended Data Fig. 2a), both of which lack substantial concentrations of PtdIns(4,5)P22,3. As a control for the phosphoinositide-binding specificity of the PtdIns(4,5)P2 sensor, we showed that it failed to appear in coated pits if we introduced point mutations into the PH(PLCδ1) domain that are known to prevent PtdIns(4,5)P2 binding12,13 (Figs 1b, 2a). Moreover, EGFP-PH(PLCδ1) alone accumulated throughout the plasma membrane and not in fluorescence-enriched spots that colocalized with clathrin-coated pits (Figs 1b, 2a, Supplementary Video 2). In the plasma membrane, PtdIns(4,5)P2 is essential for initiating and sustaining assembly of endocytic coated pits14–16. Depletion of plasma membrane PtdIns(4,5)P2 by rapid, light-activated transfer of the inositol 5-phosphatase module of inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase OCRL from the cytosol to the plasma membrane14 prevented new AP2 adaptor complex fluorescent spots from appearing (no initiation of endocytic coated pits) and stalled those already present (no maturation of pits) (Extended Data Fig. 2b). The PtdIns(4,5)P2 sensor was not recruited to the stalled pits—a stringent test of its lipid specificity (Extended Data Fig. 2c).
The phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PtdIns3P) sensor EGFP-2 × FYVE(Hrs)-Aux1 appeared in a burst that coincided with clathrin coat disassembly (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Video 3). The Aux1 clathrin-binding domain ensured specificity of the sensor for clathrin-containing structures (Fig. 2b). There was no sensor recruitment for a disabled variant with mutations in the PtdIns3P binding site17 (Fig. 2b, Extended Data Fig. 4a). The PtdIns3P sensor recruitment mimicked the normal pattern of Aux1 association4,7: absent from assembling coated pits and appearing in a burst immediately after dynamin-catalysed release of coated vesicles (Extended Data Fig. 1a).
The phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PtdIns4P) sensor EGFP-P4M(DrrA)-Aux1 accumulated at a low, steady rate along with clathrin and AP2, and then, like native Aux14,7, appeared in an acute burst just after budding (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 2e–g, Supplementary Video 4). The burst required membrane scission, as it was absent from the stalled (that is, persistent) coated pits in cells treated with the small-molecule dynamin inhibitor dynasore-OH or depleted of dynamin2 by small interfering RNA (siRNA) (Extended Data Fig. 2e, f). EGFP-P4M(DrrA)18, which lacked the clathrin-binding region, labelled the plasma membrane diffusely (Extended Data Fig. 4a) as well as the Golgi apparatus and late endosomes/lysosomes. We confirmed the specificity of PtdIns4P binding by mutation of PtdIns4P binding residues19 (Fig. 2c). In cells subjected to acute light-activated depletion of PtdIns(4,5)P2, PtdIns4P appeared in pits stalled by loss of PtdIns(4,5)P2, but the PtdIns4P burst accompanying uncoating did not occur (Extended Data Fig. 2d). PtdIns4P bursts appeared after membrane scission in the coated vesicles that had formed at the onset of light-activated depletion, when PtdIns(4,5)P2 had not yet been sufficiently depleted.
We enhanced the temporal precision of measurements between the onset of the loss of signal from the PtdIns(4,5)P2 sensor and the burst of signal from the PtdIns4P sensor by co-expressing the PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns4P sensors in the same cells (Extended Data Fig. 2g). PtdIns(4,5)P2 had begun to disappear at the time of onset of the PtdIns4P burst, which immediately followed conversion of a coated pit into a coated vesicle.
The PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor, EGFP-2×PH(TAPP1)-Aux1, appeared in coated vesicles but not in coated pits; the association remained even after uncoating had finished (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Video 5). Depletion from coated pits of the proposed PtdIns(3,4)P2 effector SNX920 did not induce capture of the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor (Extended Data Fig. 5a), showing that protection of PtdIns(3,4)P2 by SNX9 cannot account for sensor exclusion. Acute dynamin accumulation leads to membrane scission, transforming the coated pit into a vesicle and releasing it from the plasma membrane21,22. In gene-edited dynamin2-EGFP+/+ SUM159 cells21, recruitment of the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor began only after the burst accumulation of dynamin2-EGFP was complete (Extended Data Fig. 5b), consistent with absence of the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor from stalled coated pits in cells treated with dynasore-OH or depleted of dynamin2 (Extended Data Fig. 5a). The onset of recruitment of the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor coincided with vesicle release from the plasma membrane, and continued during the subsequent loss of the clathrin signal (Fig. 2d, Extended Data Fig. 5a, Supplementary Video 5). Unlike the burst recruitment of Aux1 or of the PtdIns3P and PtdIns4P sensors, the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor remained associated with the vesicular carrier even after uncoating had ended (Fig. 2d, Extended Data Fig. 5a). This late association of the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor with the uncoated vesicles was possible because a few clathrin molecules remained on the uncoated vesicle (Extended Data Fig. 5c, d). As with the other sensors, we confirmed the specificity of the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor by showing that a version with mutations at the positions of PtdIns(3,4)P2-binding residues23 failed to appear in coated structures (Fig. 2d).
The presence in most cells of multiple enzymes for catalysing specific phosphoinositide interconversions suggests functional redundancy in generating the phosphoinositide dynamics just outlined. As described in more detail in Fig. 3, Extended Data Figs 6–8 and the Supplementary Discussion, we used gene editing and partial knockdown (KD) with RNAi to test for potential roles for phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type IIIα (PI4KIIIα), phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase type Iγ (PIPKIγ), synaptojanin1 (Synj1) and OCRL in the reactions that affect coated pits and their scission, and potential roles for the class II phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase C2α (PI3K-C2α), the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Vps34 and inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphatase type I (INPP4A) in generating PtdIns3P in coated vesicles. Our data indicate that PI4KIIIα and PIPKIγ generate PtdIns4P and a fraction of PtdIns(4,5)P2 in coated pits at the plasma membrane (Fig. 3a, Extended Data Fig. 6a–d) and that both Synj1 and OCRL—phosphatases that have been suggested to be part of the conversion cascade24,25—are major sources of the compositional changes we detect in PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns4P (Fig. 3b, c, Extended Data Fig. 7h). These enzymes thus appear to have redundant functions in the cells we have used, even though their arrival times at the coated structures overlapped only partly: Synj1 recruitment began during coated pit formation and continued as uncoating proceeded (Extended Data Fig. 6e, f), while OCRL recruitment began at the onset of uncoating (Extended Data Fig. 7a–d). We have also identified the kinase PI3K-C2α and the phosphatase INPP4A as the enzymes that generate PtdIns3P from phosphatidylinositol and PtdIns(3,4)P2 in coated vesicles (Fig. 3d, Extended Data Fig. 8). We have not yet identified the enzyme(s) that generate PtdIns(3,4)P2 in coated vesicles.
Rab5 is an early endosome-specific small GTPase26. We made three gene-edited SUM159 cell lines: EGFP-Rab5a+/+, expressing EGFP-Rab5a at both alleles; EGFP-Rab5c+/+, expressing EGFP-Rab5c at both alleles; and EGFP-Rab5a+/+ EGFP-Rab5c+/+, expressing both tagged proteins at all four alleles (Extended Data Fig. 9a). In no case did we detect any EGFP-Rab5 molecules in coated pits or coated vesicles, even using TIRF with single-molecule sensitivity (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Fig. 9b, d, Supplementary Video 6). The onset of Rab5 recruitment coincided in a few instances with the very end of uncoating (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Fig. 9b, d), but the TIRF geometry did not allow us to follow most of the uncoated vesicles as they moved into the cell. We obtained similar results in gene-edited human SVGA cells27 (Extended Data Fig. 9e) and in SUM159 cells transiently expressing EGFP-Rab5a (Extended Data Fig. 9f). As expected, we also found EGFP-Rab5a in small endosomal vesicles in the cell interior (Extended Data Fig. 9c).
To follow uncoated vesicles after they moved away from the cell surface, we used lattice light-sheet microscopy to study the colocalization of Rab5 and the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor. Regardless of the cell surface from which they budded (Fig. 4g), about 85% of the vesicles recruited EGFP-Rab5c, with dynamics exemplified by the cohort analysis in Fig. 4b and the tracings in Fig. 4c–f. In all cases, a gradual increase in the EGFP-Rab5c signal overlapped with a steady loss of the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor, as shown by the heat map in Fig. 4e. The 3D information also allowed us to track the relative displacement of the vesicles during this period (Fig. 4f). In general, the vesicles diffused with undirected, 3D Brownian motion before acquiring Rab5c but switched to directed motion soon thereafter (Fig. 4d, f, Extended Data Fig. 10a, Supplementary Video 7); their translational speed then became too high for further tracking. These observations show that uncoated endocytic vesicles recruit Rab5 before they fuse with a Rab5-positive early endosome (Extended Data Fig. 10b). This recruitment depends on the Rab5 exchange factors hRME-6 and Rabex5 (Extended Data Fig. 10c and Supplementary Discussion).
We summarize in Fig. 5 the appearance and disappearance of PtdIns(4,5)P2, PtdIns3P, PtdIns4P and PtdIns(3,4)P2 during the clathrin assembly-disassembly cycle. The events analysed begin with the assembly of coated pits at the plasma membrane, continue with the pinching off of coated vesicles and subsequent loss of the clathrin coat, and end with directional translocation of the uncoated vesicles to endosomes. The phosphoinositide content of the membrane of a nascent coated pit directly reflects the PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns4P composition of the surrounding plasma membrane, but it changes immediately after budding, with a succession of alterations in the levels of PtdIns(4,5)P2, PtdIns3P, PtdIns4P and PtdIns(3,4)P2 between the time a coated vesicle buds and the time uncoating is complete. The lateral diffusion coefficient of a phospholipid in a membrane bilayer is approximately 1 μm2 s−1, corresponding to a mean displacement in one second of about 2 μm, or about 50 times the radius of a typical coated pit. Thus, even recruitment of a phosphoinositide kinase to a nascent coated structure could not generate a local lipid concentration profile substantially different from that of the plasma membrane as a whole. Membrane scission abruptly blocks any further exchange, however, enabling enzymatic conversion to change relative phosphoinositide levels. A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase produces PtdIns3P from phosphatidylinositol, and two 5-phosphatases produce PtdIns4P from PtdIns(4,5)P2 (Fig. 3f). The former activity might also then make PtdIns(3,4)P2, or a third enzyme might generate this product from PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. A third enzyme appears to be necessary, to account for the observation that loss of PI3K-C2α eliminates the PtdIns3P burst but not the accumulation of PtdIns(3,4)P2.
Our results lead to three general conclusions. (1) A programmed series of phosphoinositide conversions accompanies the various stages of the clathrin assembly-disassembly cycle in endocytic membrane traffic. (2) Because these conversions, with half-times of 1–5 s, depend on closure of the vesicle, their onset creates a molecular signal that scission is complete. (3) A cascade of dependencies leads to further molecular signals, one of which (accumulation of PtdIns(3,4)P2) announces substantial uncoating and may bring about arrival of Rab5 GTPases.
Most of the experiments in this paper were carried out with human SUM159 cells, which are particularly amenable to gene editing. Further experiments were conducted with human SVGA cells, human fibroblasts and monkey COS-7 cells. The identity of particular converting enzymes, or even the critical phosphoinositide species, might in principle differ in other cell types, and when multiple enzymes catalyse a particular step, one might dominate in a particular tissue. Synj1 dominates PtdIns(4,5)P2 conversion in neurons25, for example, whereas OCRL is more broadly important24. Nonetheless, we suggest that the underlying principle illustrated by the observations reported here—a cascade of molecular conversions made possible by separation of the vesicle from the parent membrane—will prove generally valid and that other routes of membrane traffic are likely to have distinct cascades with similar characteristics.
METHODS
Reagents.
The PI4KIIIα selective inhibitor A128 was a gift from T. Balla. The VPS34 selective inhibitors PIK-III29 and VPS34-IN130 were gifts from D. Alessi. The Janelia Fluor™ 646 fluorescently tagged HaloTag ligand31 was a gift from L. D. Lavis. The antibodies against PI3K-C2α (611046), OCRL (HPA012495) and HRP-conjugated 6 ×-His Tag (MA1–21315-HRP) were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories, Sigma-Aldrich and Thermo Fisher Scientific, respectively.
Plasmids and transfection.
The DNA sequences encoding the full-length Aux1 (910 residues, NP_777261.1), or residues 1–814 and 420–814 of Aux1, were amplified by PCR from a full-length bovine cDNA clone4 and inserted into pEGFP-C1 to generate the plasmids EGFP-Aux1, EGFP-Aux1(1–814) and EGFP-Aux1(420–814), respectively. The PH domain of PLCδ112, the P4M domain of DrrA18, the tandem FYVE domains of Hrs17, the tandem PH domains of TAPP123, the triple repeat PHD domains of ING232, and the PH domain of Btk33 were amplified by PCR from the corresponding expression vectors, which were gifts from T. Balla, H. Stenmark, T. Takenawa and O. Gozani. Fragments with the DNA sequences encoding the corresponding phosphoinositide-binding domains were inserted into pEGFP-C1 or mCherry-C1 to generate the EGFP- or mCherry-fused phosphoinositide-binding proteins. A linker (5′-GGAGGATCCGGTGGATCTGGAGGTTCTGGTGGTTCTGGTGGTTCC-3′) was placed between EGFP or mCherry and the DNA fragments. To generate the Aux1-based phosphoinositide-binding sensors, the sequences of the lipid-binding domains described above or appropriate mutants unable to bind lipids were first amplified by PCR and then inserted between EGFP and Aux1(420–814) of plasmid EGFP-Aux1(420–814).
The DNA sequences encoding the full-length epsin1 isoform c (550 residues, NP_037465.2), or residues 230–475 of epsin1 isoform c (NP_037465.2) were amplified by PCR from a full-length human cDNA clone and inserted into pEGFP-C1 to generate the plasmids EGFP-epsin1 and EGFP-epsin1(230–475), respectively. To generate the epsin1-based phosphoinositide-binding sensors, the sequences of the lipid-binding domains described above were amplified by PCR and subsequently fused to epsin1(230–475) before insertion into pEGFP-C1.
The plasmids EGFP-PI3K-C2α (wild type) and EGFP-kdPI3K-C2α (kinase-deficient) were gifts from Y. Takuwa34. The wild-type and kinase-deficient PI3K-C2α versions resistant to siRNA (5′-GGATCTTTTTAAACCTATT-3′) were generated using PCR by introducing mutations (5′-AGATCTATTCAAACCGATT-3′)20 followed by insertion into mCherry-C1.
The mCherry-CLTA plasmid encoding mCherry fused to the N terminus of the rat clathrin light chain A1 has been described35. A chimaera of EEA1 fused at its N terminus with HaloTag was generated by replacement of EGFP in EGFP-EEA136 (Addgene plasmid #42307).
The plasmids CIBN-CAAX, mCherry-CRY2–5-ptaseOCRL and mCherry-CRY2–5-ptaseOCRL(D523G) used for light-activated membrane targeting14 were gifts from P. De Camilli.
Transfections were performed using TransfeX Transfection Reagent (ATCC) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and cells with relatively low levels of sensor expression were imaged 16–20 h after transfection.
Cell culture.
The mostly diploid SUM159 human breast carcinoma cells37 were provided by J. Brugge; they were grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in DMEM/F-12/GlutaMAX (GIBCO), supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Atlanta Biologicals), 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin (VWR International), 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 μg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10 mM HEPES (Mediatech), pH 7.4. The de-identified human dermal fibroblasts from a control culture (PHL336)38,39 were a gift from P. De Camilli. COS-7 cells were obtained from The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). COS-7 cells and human dermal fibroblasts were grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in DMEM (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS (Atlanta Biologicals), 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin (VWR International). All cells were routinely verified to be mycoplasma free using a PCR-based assay.
Genome editing of SUM159 cells to express EGFP-Synj1+/+, EGFP-OCRL+/+, EGFP-PI3K-C2α+/−, EGFP-Rab5a+/+, or EGFP-Rab5c+/+ using the CRISPR-Cas9 approach.
SUM159 cells were gene-edited to incorporate EGFP to the N terminus of Synj1 (only the Synj1 isoform 170-kDa was detected by cDNA sequencing), OCRL (only isoform 1b was detected by cDNA sequencing), PI3K-C2α, Rab5a and Rab5c using the CRISPR-Cas9 approach40. The target sequences at the genomic locus recognized by the single-guide RNA (sgRNA) are 5′-GCGGCGCAATGCGGAAGAGA-3′ for SYNJ1,5′-CTGGATGGAGCCGC CGCTCC-3′ for OCRL, 5′-TTTGGTCTTTTTAGTGGACA-3′ for PIK3C2A, 5′-ACTTATTTCAAATTTGGACA-3′ for RAB5A, and 5′-TGGACGGGCAATGGCGGGTC-3′ for RAB5C. The sgRNA containing the targeting sequence was delivered as PCR amplicons containing a PCR-amplifìed U6-driven sgRNA expression cassette40.
Donor constructs used as templates for homologous recombination to repair the Cas9-induced double-strand DNA breaks were generated by cloning into the pUC19 vector with two ~800-nucleotide fragments of human genomic DNA upstream and downstream of the start codon of SYNJ1, OCRL, PIK3C2A, RAB5A or RAB5C and the open reading frame of EGFP using Gibson Assembly Master Mix (New England BioLabs). The upstream and downstream genomic fragments were generated by PCR amplification reactions from the genomic DNA extracted from SUM159 cells using the QiaAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen). The open reading frame encoding EGFP and a flexible linker (5′-GGAGGTTCTGGTGGTTCTGGTGGTTCC-3′) was obtained by PCR from an EGFP expression vector.
SUM159 cells plated overnight in 6-well plates were transfected with 800 ng each of the donor plasmid, the plasmid coding for the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9, and the free PCR product using Lipofectamin 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Between seven and ten days after transfection, cells expressing EGFP chimaeras were enriched by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using a FACSAria II instrument (BD Biosciences) equipped with an 85-μm nozzle. The sorted cells were expanded and subjected to one or two more subsequent bulk sortings to enrich the EGFP-positive cells. After that, the enriched cells were subjected to single-cell sorting into 96-well plates to select and then expand monoclonal cell populations; a subset of these cell populations were screened for successful incorporation in the genomic locus of EGFP by PCR using GoTaq Polymerase (Promega).
Genome editing of SUM159 cells to express CLTA-TagRFP using the TALEN-based approach.
SUM159 cells were genome edited to incorporate TagRFP into the C terminus of clathrin light chain A (CLTA) using a TALEN-based protocol41. The upstream targeting sequence 5′-TCTCCCTCAAGCAGGCCCCG-3′ is located nine nucleotides upstream of the CLTA stop codon TGA. The downstream targeting sequence 5′-TGTAGTGTTTCCACAGGGTG-3′ is located five nucleotides downstream of the CLTA stop codon TGA. The donor construct was generated by fusion of two ~800-nucleotide fragments of human genomic DNA upstream and downstream of the stop codon of CLTA with the open reading frame of TagRFP into the pCR8/GW TOPO vector (Invitrogen).
SUM159 cells plated overnight in 6-well plates were transfected with 600 ng each of the upstream and downstream TALEN targeting sequences and the donor construct using TransIT-2020 Transfection Reagent (Mirus Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The monoclonal cell populations were obtained by flow cytometry single cell sorting as described above and screened for both alleles modified to express CLTA-TagRFP by PCR using GoTaq Polymerase (Promega).
Knockout of OCRL and Synjl in SUM159 cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 approach.
Knockout of OCRL and Synj1 were performed using the CRISPR-Cas9 approach by transduction with a lentiviral vector (LentiCRISPR) encoding Cas9 and the appropriate sgRNA targeting sequence42.
The target sequence for OCRL overlapping the start codon ATG (underlined) is 5′-CTGGATGGAGCCGCCGCTCC-3′. Plasmids encoding LentiCRISPR, psPAX2 packaging and pVSV-G envelope were cotransfected into HEK293T cells using TransIT-293 (Mirus Bio) and supernatant containing lentivirus was collected 3 days after. This medium was then added to the gene-edited CLTA-TagRFP+/+ SUM159 cells and replaced 24 h afterwards with fresh medium containing 4 μg/ml puromycin (InvivoGen), followed by incubation for another 48 h. Surviving cells were plated into 96-well plates (1 cell per well) and cultured for another 2–3 weeks. Screening of the monoclonal cell populations was done by DNA sequencing of genomic PCR fragments of ~450 nucleotides centred on the sgRNA targeting sequence. O CRL-KO clones with mutations in both alleles (frame shift insertions or deletions) were identified and loss of OCRL protein expression was confirmed by western blot analysis.
Knockout of Synj1 in CLTA-TagRFP+/+ cells was performed as described above using the target sequence for SYNJ1 5′-GGGTACATACTCCAAAGTAC-3′. Synj 1-KO clones with mutations in both alleles (frame shift insertions or deletions) were identified by genomic DNA sequencing and confirmed by cDNA sequencing.
Ectopic stable expression of proteins.
SUM159 or CLTA-TagRFP+/+ SUM159 cells stably expressing the EGFP-tagged Aux1-based lipid sensors were generated by transfection followed 5–7 days later by FACS to isolate the population of cells expressing EGFP, followed by 1–2 additional bulk FACS sorting to obtain a pool and isolated cell clones stably expressing relatively low levels of sensors.
COS-7 cells or human dermal fibroblasts stably expressing TagRFP-CLTA were generated by transduction using a lentiviral vector encoding TagRFP-CLTA. The pools of cells expressing TagRFP-CLTA were identified by FACS 5–7 days after transduction. Stable expression of the Aux1-based lipid sensors in the TagRFP-CLTA COS-7 cells was obtained by subsequent transduction with lentivirus encoding appropriate sensors and those expressing relatively low levels of sensors were isolated by FACS.
mRNA depletion by shRNA or siRNA knockdown.
Lentivirus short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expressing 5′-CCGAGTTACTTCCACTGAGTT-3′ was used to knock down Synj1 (Broad Institute TRC library). The lentivirus shRNA with the unrelated sequence 5′-CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTCG-3′ was used as control. Lentivirus shRNA was produced in HEK293T cells as described above. A pool of supernatant containing lentivirus collected 24, 48 and 72 h post transfection was added to SUM159 or COS-7 cells. After 24 h, the cells were transferred to fresh medium containing 4 μg/ml puromycin (InvivoGen) and cultured for another 48 h, followed by growth for another 48 h in fresh medium. At this point, the cells were subjected to live-cell imaging and analysed by real-time quantitative PCR to confirm the efficiency of the knockdown.
siRNAs were used to knockdown the expression of OCRL, PI3K-C2α, dynamin2, SNX9, INPP4A, PIPKIγ, hRME-6 or Rabex5. The OCRL siRNA sequences used were: 5′-GGGT GAAGGTT GTGGAT GA-3′ and 5′-GGGCAATATGAGTTAATAATT-3′. The PI3K-C2α, dynamin2, SNX9 and INPP4A siRNA sequences used were 5′-GGATCTTTTTAAACCTATT-3′, 5′-GCAACTGACCAACCACATC-3′, 5′-AACAGTCGTGCTAGTTCCTCATCCA-3′ and 5′-GGAAATATACAAGAC CCAG-3’, respectively. They all included 3′-dTdT overhangs (Dharmacon). ON-TARGETplus SMARTpools (a mixture of four siRNAs) were used to knockdown PIPKIγ (M-004782–00-0005; Dharmacon), hRME-6 (L-026206–01-0005; Dharmacon) and Rabex5 (L-008541–00-0005; Dharmacon). A non-targeting siRNA (D-001210–03-05; Dharmacon) was used as a control.
Knockdown of OCRL or dynamin2 was achieved by transfection using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) of cells plated overnight and then subjected to analysis by live-cell imaging, real-time quantitative PCR and western blot analysis 3 days later. Knockdown of PI3K-C2α, SNX9, INPP4A, PIPKIγ, hRME-6 or Rabex5 was done by two sequential transfections, the first one in cells after overnight plating and the second two days later, followed by analysis 2 days later. Oligofectamine (Invitrogen) was used for PI3K-C2α and Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) for the others.
Real-time quantitative PCR.
Real-time quantitative PCR was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions as follows. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen). The SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) was used to generate cDNA from the extracted RNA. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using the FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Rox) (Roche) and the StepOnePlus Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). GAPDH expression was analysed for normalization. The following primers were used: (1) Synj1 forward: 5′-GAGGCAATCAAGGGTACATACT-3′; Synj1 reverse: 5′-TCCAGTGACTAGGACCAGATAA-3′; (2) OCRL forward: 5′-TTT GAAGTTCCTCTCAGCTGTC-3′; OCRL reverse: 5′-CAGAAGGTTTGTCCTTAG TGTCT-3′; (3) PI3K-C2α forward: 5′-TTCCACTTTGGAAGTTACCAGGC; PI3K-C2α reverse: 5′-AGATCACACTCTGCTACATCCGT-3′; (4) dynamin2 forward: 5′-ACTTACATCCGGGAACGGGA-3′; dynamin2 reverse: 5′-CTCTG CTGGGCATTGGCAAAC-3′; (5) SNX9 forward: 5′ - GAT G AG AAG G A AT G GAAAACTGGAA-3′; SNX9 reverse: 5′-AGCCTCGCACTTCTGCTCTATT-3′; (6) INPP4A forward: 5′-GCTGTTTGACGCCTTGCC-3′; INPP4A reverse: 5′-GACGTATCGCCAAACCTCTC-3′; (7) PIPKIγ forward: 5′-ATCCTGCAGTCC TACAGGTTCA-3′; PIPKIγ reverse: 5′-GTTCTTCCGAAAGACCGTGT-3′; (8) hRME-6 forward: 5′-ACGCGAGTGAAGAACAGCTT-3′; hRME-6 reverse: 5′-TGTTCATGAAGAACCTGGTCGC-3′; (9) Rabex5 forward: 5′-CTTCCACAAG ACAGGCCAAGA-3′; Rabex5 reverse: 5′-TGTTCTTCAATGCTTAGAT CCCTTT-3′; and (10) GAPDH forward: 5′-AATCCCATCACCATCTTCCA-3′; GAPDH reverse: 5′-TGGACTCCACGACGTACTCA-3′.
Western blot analysis.
Western blot analysis was performed as described35. The cells were washed three times in PBS and then solubilized at 4 °C for 30 min in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Then the samples were pelleted at 14,000g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration (total lysate) was determined using the BCA assay (Pierce). The samples were then mixed with 5 × sample buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl at pH 6.8, 10% SDS, 50% glycerol, 0.5% bromophenol blue and 10% β-mercaptoethanol) and heated to 99 °C for 10 min, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman). The membrane was then incubated in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris and 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.6) containing 3% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with the anti-OCRL antibody (1:250) or anti-PI3K-C2α antibody (1:500) diluted in TBST containing 3% BSA. After three washes in TBST (10 min each), the membrane was incubated with the appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Amersham Biosciences) at room temperature for 1 h. After three more washes (10 min each) in TBST, the membrane was incubated with LumiGLO Chemiluminescent Substrate (KPL) and imaged using a Las 3000 system (Fujifilm).
Purification of the Auxl-based sensors and lipid-protein overlay assay.
The DNA sequences encoding EGFP-Aux1(420–814) and the four EGFP-tagged Auxl-based phosphoinositide-binding sensors (EGFP-2×FYVE(Hrs)-Aux1, EGFP-cP4M(DrrA)-Aux1, EGFP-2×PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 and EGFP-PH(PLCδl)-Auxl) were flanked at the N-and C termini by 6×-His tags upon insertion into the pET-28a bacterial expression vector. Expression of the chimaeric proteins was carried out in BL21 Escherichia coli, with induction by incubation with 0.6 mM isopropyl-thiogalactopyranoside, at 37 °C for 3 h for EGFP-2×FYVE(Hrs)-Aux1, or 22 °C for the remaining proteins (overnight growth, except for EGFP-2×PH(TAPP1)-Aux1, for which growth was limited to 6 h). Cells were lysed by brief sonication, and lysates subjected to ultracentrifugation. The supernatant was incubated with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 20 min at 4 °C, and proteins eluted using 200 mM imidazole. EGFP-2×PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 was further purified by gel filtration chromatography (Superdex 200; GE Healthcare). Western blot analysis using an HRP-conjugated 6 × - His Tag monoclonal antibody (1:4,000 diluted in TBST containing 2% milk) confirmed that all protein samples corresponded to the full-length EGFP chimaeras, with no prominent degradation products.
The phosphoinositide-binding specificity of the Aux1-based sensors was determined by a lipid-protein overlay assay using PIP Strips according to the manufacturer’s instructions (P-6001; Echelon). In brief, the PIP Strips were first incubated with blocking buffer (TBST containing 3% fatty acid free BSA) for 1 h at room temperature. Then the PIP Strips were incubated with the chimaeric proteins (~0.4–10 μg/ml) in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes in TBST (5 min each), the PIP Strips were incubated with the HRP-conjugated 6×-His Tag monoclonal antibody (1:4,000 diluted in TBST containing 2% milk) for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes (5 min each) in TBST, the PIP Strips were incubated with LumiGLO Chemiluminescent Substrate (KPL) and imaged using the Amersham Imager 600 (GE Healthcare).
Transferrin uptake.
Transferrin uptake by a flow cytometry-based assay was done as described21. In brief, SUM159 cells stably expressing increasing amounts of the various Aux1-based EGFP-tagged sensors were plated overnight in 12-well plates. The cells were then washed once with α-MEM (GIBCO) and then incubated with 5 μg/ml Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated transferrin (Invitrogen) in α-MEM for 10 min at 4 °C or 37 °C. The plates were then placed on top of wet ice and the cells rinsed with ice-chilled PBS, followed by two brief rinses with the ice-chilled PBS or acid wash medium (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.125 mM CaCl2, and 0.1 M glycine, pH 2.5) to remove membrane-bound transferrin. The cells were released from the plates by incubation in 5 mM EDTA in PBS, spun, resuspended in ice-chilled PBS, spun and resuspended in 250 μl ice-chilled PBS containing 0.1% FBS. The amount of membrane bound or internalized transferrin (~ 15,000–30,000 cells per measurement) was determined using the 633-nm laser line of the FACSCanto2 (BD Biosciences).
TIRF and spinning-disk confocal microscopy: live-cell imaging and image analysis.
The TIRF microscopy system used as described35 was based on a fully enclosed, environmentally temperature-controlled Axiovert 200M microscope equipped with an Alpha Plan-Apo 100 × objective (1.46 NA, Carl Zeiss), a TIRF slider with manual angle and focus controls (Carl Zeiss), and a cooled CCD camera (QuantEM, 512SC, Photometrics). A 2 × magnification lens was placed in front of the CCD camera, which provided a final pixel size corresponding to 80 nm of image. Solid-state lasers were used for excitation at 488 nm (Saphire, Coherent) and 561 nm (Jive, Cobolt AB). The emission light was collected using a dual view emission splitting unit (DV2, Photometrics) equipped with a 520/35 nm bandpass filter for EGFP collection and a 620/60 nm bandpass filter for TagRFP and mCherry collection. In order to increase the penetration depth of TIRF illumination while maintaining the single molecule sensitivity, the oblique-angle illumination TIRF mode was used with the incidence angle of the excitation light slightly below the critical angle43,44. The spinning-disk confocal microscopy set up was used as described35. Time series were acquired using Slidebook (Intelligent Imaging Innovations).
Glass coverslips (#1.5; Warner Instruments) were cleaned by sonication for 30 min in ethanol and then dried. Cells were plated on the cleaned coverslips and cultured for 4–6 h for SUM159 cells and overnight for COS-7 cells or human dermal fibroblasts. The coverslips with plated cells were then placed in an Attofluor Cell Chamber (Invitrogen) and covered with pre-warmed α-MEM (GIBCO) supplemented with 5% FBS and 20 mM HEPES. The chamber was then inserted into the temperature-controlled sample holder maintained at 37 °C in a humidified environment at 5% CO2 (20/20 Technology) placed inside the environmentally controlled chamber of the microscope.
The detection and tracking of clathrin-coated structures and the associated EGFP-labelled Aux1-based phosphoinositide sensors were carried out using the cmeAnalysis software package with clathrin CLTA-TagRFP as the ‘master’ channel and EGFP-labelled sensors as the ‘slave’ channel10. For the automated detection, the standard deviation of the estimated Gaussian point spread function (PSF) was 1.36 pixels for TagRFP and 1.19 pixels for EGFP. The minimum and maximum tracking search radius were one and three pixels, respectively, with a maximum gap length of two frames within a trajectory. Valid clathrin traces with lifetimes between 20 and 120 s and with significant sensor signal in the slave channel were automatically selected. The intensity-lifetime cohorts were generated as described10 and showed similar distributions to those previously determined for endocytic clathrin-coated pits and vesicles imaged in htertRPE-1 and SUM159 cells45,46. The burst signal of the PtdIns4P sensor was calculated as the difference between maximum intensity during burst and average intensity from five early-stage frames starting 13 s before the peak.
The single EGFP molecule calibration was carried out as described previously35 where single EGFP molecules were detected using the cmeAnalysis software package10. Recombinant EGFP made in E. coli was used to determine the fluorescence intensity of a single EGFP molecule. The recombinant EGFP in PBS was placed on the freshly plasma glow-discharged glass coverslip (Harrick Plasma) for 10 min. After three gentle washes with PBS, the coverslip with adsorbed EGFP was imaged by TIRF microscopy using the same imaging conditions used for the experiments.
Lattice light-sheet microscopy: live-cell imaging and image analysis.
SUM159 cells expressing EGFP-Rab5c+/+ and the PtdIns(3,4)P2 sensor mCherry-2× PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 were imaged using lattice light-sheet microscopy with a dithered square lattice light-sheet as described previously11,46. The cells were plated on 5-mm coverslips (Bellco Glass) for at least 4 h before imaging, and were imaged in FluoroBrite DMEM medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 5% FBS and 20 mM HEPES at 37 °C. The cells were sequentially excited with a 488-nm laser (15–30 mW) and a 560-nm laser (50–100 mW) for ~30 ms for each channel using a 0.35-inner and 0.4-outer numerical aperture excitation annulus. The 3D volumes of the imaged cells were recorded by scanning the sample every ~2.5 s for 5 min at 500-nm step sizes in the s-axis (corresponding to ~261 nm along the z-axis), thereby capturing a volume of ~50 μm × 50 μm × 20 μm (512 × 512 × 41 pixels).
As the optical sections were acquired by scanning the sample at 500-nm step sizes, the volumes were deskewed using a geometric image transform function as described11,46. The time-series were subjected to 3D detection and tracking of diffraction-limited objects (minimum and maximum search radius of three and six pixels, respectively; and allowing for a two-frame maximum gap in a trajectory) as described46. Lifetime distributions, intensity cohorts, and event density statistics were calculated as described46. The fitted amplitudes of the diffraction-limited objects were converted to an approximate number of molecules using singlemolecule calibration. In brief, diluted purified EGFP (~picomolar concentration range) was deposited on air plasma-oxidized 5-mm glass coverslips and imaged by lattice light-sheet microscopy with the same experimental settings and power conditions while varying the exposure times in order to be able to image single EGFP molecules. A previously described 3D point-source detection algorithm46 was used to detect EGFP molecules immobilized on glass substrates over time, where these detected diffraction-limited objects were further filtered out on the basis of their lifetime, and on a statistical t-test between the fitted amplitude of the EGFP and the fitted local background (α = 0.01) to determine whether a detected value was statistically significant before stochastically bleaching in the imaging window. The smallest step-size of the filtered molecules was determined at varying exposures by fitting the distribution of amplitudes with a mixture-model Gaussian fitting algorithm10, to determine the conversion factor at the experimental imaging exposure conditions. The point-to-point 3D displacement (Fig. 4d, f) was calculated using the sub-pixel positions of each detected object over time (fitted using a PSF approximated 3D Gaussian kernel). All analyses were performed using custom routines written in MATLAB 2014a (MathWorks).
The colour-coded plots shown in Fig. 4d–f and Extended Data Fig. 10a were generated using custom MATLAB routines. For each track, the signal intensities corresponding to mCherry-PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 and EGFP-Rab5c were rescaled from 0 to 1. A patch object, that is, the single connecting coloured line segment between two time points generated for each interval (tn − tn+1, tn+1 − tn+2, and so on) helped us to visualize the content of the tracked object as a function of time. The patch object corresponding to each interval was configured for its colour and transparency; in brief, the normalized values of mCherry-PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 and EGFP-Rab5c were directly placed in the red and green fields, respectively, of an RGB colour matrix. The transparency of the patch object was scaled from 33% to 100%, where objects with normalized mCherry-PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 and EGFP-Rab5c values of zero would correspond to an RGB matrix of [0,0,0] and appear as a translucent black patch with 33% opacity; for comparison, normalized mCherry-PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 and EGFP-Rab5c values of one would correspond to an RGB matrix of [1,1,0] and appear as a solid orange patch (100% red from mCherry-PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 + 100% green from EGFP-Rab5c) with 100% opacity. Lastly, the various combinations of normalized mCherry-PH(TAPP1)-Aux1 and EGFP-Rab5c values populating the RGB and transparency matrix are shown in the 2D colourmap inset next to the figures.
Statistical tests.
Because the large sizes of the sample sizes, Cohen’s d effect size47 was used to report the practical significance of the difference in magnitude between the means of different treatments. The data in Fig. 3 are mean ± s.d. in a, c-e and mean ± s.e.m. in b. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments. 95% confidence intervals of Cohen’s d are: [0.75, 1.03] and [0.92, 1.20] (a); [0.62, 0.82] and [−0.06, 0.14] (c); [0.71, 0.90] (d); [0.12, 0.30] (e).
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
Code availability.
The custom MATLAB routines are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Data availability.
The data that support the findings of the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The full gel source data have been provided in Supplementary Fig. 1.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Alessi, T. Balla, P. De Camilli, O. Gozani, L. Lavis, H. Stenmark, T. Takenawa and Y Takuwa for reagents; J. R. Houser for maintaining the TIRF and spinning-disk microscopes; J. England for advice and support; members of our laboratory for help and encouragement; and in particular S. C. Harrison for discussions and editorial help. R.M. was supported by a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship from the DoD Air Force Office of Scientific Research and E.S. by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770900, 31270884, 30900268), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (5122026, 5092017) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2011087). S.U. is a Fellow at the Image and Data Analysis core at Harvard Medical School and thanks H. Elliott and D. Richmond for discussions, and acknowledges the MATLAB code repository received from the Computational Image Analysis Workshop supported by NIH grant GM103792. T.K. acknowledges support from the Janelia Visitor Program and thanks E. Betzig, E. Marino, T Liu and W. Legant for help and advice in constructing and installing the lattice light-sheet microscope. Construction of the lattice light-sheet microscope was supported by grants from Biogen and Ionis Pharmaceuticals to TK. The research was supported by NIH grant NIH R01 GM075252 to T.K.
Footnotes
Online Content Methods, along with any additional Extended Data display items and Source Data, are available in the online version of the paper; references unique to these sections appear only in the online paper.
Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher's Disclaimer: Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of the paper Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Vance JE & Steenbergen R Metabolism and functions of phosphatidylserine. Prog. Lipid Res 44, 207–234 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Balla T Phosphoinositides: tiny lipids with giant impact on cell regulation. Physiol. Rev 93, 1019–1137 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Di Paolo G & De Camilli P Phosphoinositides in cell regulation and membrane dynamics. Nature 443, 651–657 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Massol RH, Boll W, Griffin AM & Kirchhausen T A burst of auxilin recruitment determines the onset of clathrin-coated vesicle uncoating. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10265–10270 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mills IG et al. EpsinR: an AP1/clathrin interacting protein involved in vesicle trafficking. J. Cell Biol 160, 213–222 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Messa M et al. Epsin deficiency impairs endocytosis by stalling the actin-dependent invagination of endocytic clathrin-coated pits. eLife 3, e03311 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee DW, Wu X, Eisenberg E & Greene LE Recruitment dynamics of GAK and auxilin to clathrin-coated pits during endocytosis. J. Cell Sci 119, 3502–3512 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Guan R, Dai H, Harrison SC & Kirchhausen T Structure of the PTEN-like region of auxilin, a detector of clathrin-coated vesicle budding. Structure 18, 1191–1198 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fotin A et al. Structure of an auxilin-bound clathrin coat and its implications for the mechanism of uncoating. Nature 432, 649–653 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aguet F, Antonescu CN, Mettlen M, Schmid SL & Danuser G Advances in analysis of low signal-to-noise images link dynamin and AP2 to the functions of an endocytic checkpoint. Dev. Cell 26, 279–291 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen BC et al. Lattice light-sheet microscopy: imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science 346, 1257998 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Várnai P & Balla T Visualization of phosphoinositides that bind pleckstrin homology domains: calcium-and agonist-induced dynamic changes and relationship to myo-[3H]inositol-labeled phosphoinositide pools. J. Cell Biol 143, 501–510 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Temmerman K et al. A direct role for phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate in unconventional secretion of fibroblast growth factor 2. Traffic 9, 1204–1217 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Idevall-Hagren O, Dickson EJ, Hille B, Toomre DK & De Camilli P Optogenetic control of phosphoinositide metabolism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2316–E2323 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boucrot E, Saffarian S, Massol R, Kirchhausen T & Ehrlich M Role of lipids and actin in the formation of clathrin-coated pits. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 4036–4048 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zoncu R et al. Loss of endocytic clathrin-coated pits upon acute depletion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3793–3798 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gillooly DJ et al. Localization of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate in yeast and mammalian cells. EMBO J. 19, 4577–4588 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hammond GR, Machner MP & Balla T A novel probe for phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate reveals multiple pools beyond the Golgi. J. Cell Biol 205, 113–126 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhu Y et al. Structural mechanism of host Rab1 activation by the bifunctional Legionella type IV effector SidM/DrrA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4699–4704 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Posor Y et al. Spatiotemporal control of endocytosis by phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate. Nature 499, 233–237 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cocucci E, Gaudin R & Kirchhausen T Dynamin recruitment and membrane scission at the neck of a clathrin-coated pit. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 3595–3609 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schmid SL & Frolov VA Dynamin: functional design of a membrane fission catalyst. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 27, 79–105 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Oikawa T, Itoh T & Takenawa T Sequential signals toward podosome formation in NIH-src cells. J. Cell Biol 182, 157–169 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.De Matteis MA, Staiano L, Emma F & Devuyst O The 5-phosphatase OCRL in Lowe syndrome and Dent disease 2. Nat. Rev. Nephrol 13, 455–470 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cremona O et al. Essential role of phosphoinositide metabolism in synaptic vesicle recycling. Cell 99, 179–188 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Villaseñor R, Kalaidzidis Y & Zerial M Signal processing by the endosomal system. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 39, 53–60 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chou YY et al. Identification and characterization of a novel broad-spectrum virus entry inhibitor. J. Virol 90, 4494–4510 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bojjireddy N et al. Pharmacological and genetic targeting of the PI4KA enzyme reveals its important role in maintaining plasma membrane phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate levels. J. Biol. Chem 289, 6120–6132 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dowdle WE et al. Selective VPS34 inhibitor blocks autophagy and uncovers a role for NCOA4 in ferritin degradation and iron homeostasis in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol 16, 1069–1079 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bago R et al. Characterization of VPS34-IN1, a selective inhibitor of Vps34, reveals that the phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate-binding SGK3 protein kinase is a downstream target of class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Biochem. J 463, 413–427 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Grimm JB et al. A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy. Nat. Methods 12, 244–250 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gozani O et al. The PHD finger of the chromatin-associated protein ING2 functions as a nuclear phosphoinositide receptor. Cell 114, 99–111 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Várnai P, Rother KI & Balla T Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent membrane association of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase pleckstrin homology domain visualized in single living cells. J. Biol. Chem 274, 10983–10989 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yoshioka K et al. Endothelial PI3K-C2α, a class II PI3K, has an essential role in angiogenesis and vascular barrier function. Nat. Med 18, 1560–1569 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cocucci E, Aguet F, Boulant S & Kirchhausen T The first five seconds in the life of a clathrin-coated pit. Cell 150, 495–507 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lawe DC, Patki V, Heller-Harrison R, Lambright D & Corvera S The FYVE domain of early endosome antigen 1 is required for both phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and Rab5 binding. Critical role of this dual interaction for endosomal localization. J. Biol. Chem 275, 3699–3705 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Forozan F et al. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of 11 new breast cancer cell lines. Br. J. Cancer 81, 1328–1334 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nández R et al. A role of OCRL in clathrin-coated pit dynamics and uncoating revealed by studies of Lowe syndrome cells. eLife 3, e02975 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Suchy SF & Nussbaum RL The deficiency of PIP2 5-phosphatase in Lowe syndrome affects actin polymerization. Am. J. Hum. Genet 71, 1420–1427 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ran FA et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protocols 8, 2281–2308 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sanjana NE et al. A transcription activator-like effector toolbox for genome engineering. Nat. Protocols 7, 171–192 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shalem O et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kasai RS et al. Full characterization of GPCR monomer-dimer dynamic equilibrium by single molecule imaging. J. Cell Biol 192, 463–480 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang K, Chowdary P D. & Cui, B. Visualizing directional Rab7 and TrkA cotrafficking in axons by pTIRF microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol 1298, 319–329 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kadlecova Z et al. Regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by hierarchical allosteric activation of AP2. J. Cell Biol 216, 167–179 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Aguet F et al. Membrane dynamics of dividing cells imaged by lattice light-sheet microscopy. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 3418–3435 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn (L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The full gel source data have been provided in Supplementary Fig. 1.