Abstract
The ability to regenerate missing body parts exists throughout the animal kingdom. Positional information is critical for regeneration, but how it is harbored and utilized by differentiated tissues is poorly understood. In planarians, positional information has been identified through RNA interference (RNAi) phenotypes in which the wrong tissues are regenerated. For example, Wnt pathway inhibition leads to regeneration of heads in place of tails1–3. Characterization of such striking adult phenotypes led to identification of genes expressed in a constitutive and regional manner, associated with patterning, called position control genes (PCGs). Most PCGs are expressed within the planarian muscle4. Despite this major positional information role for muscle in planarians, how muscle is specified and how different muscle subsets impact regeneration is unknown. Here we found distinct regulatory roles for different planarian muscle fibers during regeneration. myoD was required for formation of a specific muscle cell subset: the longitudinal fibers, oriented along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis. Loss of longitudinal fibers led to a complete regeneration failure because of defects in regeneration initiation. A different transcription factor (TF)-encoding gene, nkx1-1, was required for formation of circular fibers, oriented along the medial-lateral (ML) axis. Loss of circular fibers led to a bifurcated AP axis with fused heads forming in single anterior blastemas. Our results demonstrate distinct roles for muscle fiber types in orchestrating planarian regeneration. Whereas muscle is often viewed as a strictly contractile tissue, these findings reveal specific regulatory roles for distinct muscle classes in wound signaling and patterning to enable regeneration.
Body wall muscle (BWM) in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea consists of multiple fibers with different orientations (Fig. 1a; SI video 1). The outermost circular BWM layer runs along the ML axis, underneath the subepidermal membrane. Below, there is a diagonal and thin longitudinal muscle fiber network, and an innermost layer comprised of thick longitudinal fibers running along the AP axis (SI video 1; 5,6).
MyoD, a basic helix-loop-helix TF, has conserved roles in myogenesis7, acting in vertebrates with Myf5 and Mrf4 to generate skeletal muscle8. In C. elegans, the myoD homolog, hlh-1, synergizes with unc-120 and hnd-1 to orchestrate body wall myogenesis9. In Drosophila, by contrast, the myoD homolog nautilus is required for differentiation of a limited number of muscles10. Using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), we found that planarian myoD was primarily expressed in collagen+ BWM cells (Fig. 1b); a minor myoD+ cell fraction co-expressed the neoblast (proliferating cell) marker smedwi-1 (Extended Data Fig. 1a). Interestingly, only 46% of BWM expressed myoD, raising the possibilities that myoD expression is specific to a muscle cell subset or to a transient differentiation stage.
myoD RNAi caused animals to become longer and thinner (Fig. 1c; Extended Data Fig. 1b). BWM cells (collagen+) were substantially decreased in uninjured myoD(RNAi) animals, whereas intestinal muscle was unperturbed (Extended Data Fig. 1c). Immunostainings of myoD(RNAi) animals revealed a dramatic loss of only a subset of BWM: longitudinal fibers (Fig. 1d; SI video 2). Circular and diagonal fibers remained normal, whereas thin and thick longitudinal fibers were reduced (Fig. 1d; Extended Data Fig. 1d). Electron microscopy confirmed this longitudinal fiber-specific phenotype (Fig. 1e).
RNA-sequencing in uninjured myoD(RNAi) animals showed muscle-specific gene expression reduction (Extended Data Fig. 1e,f; SI Table 1). Other conserved TF-encoding genes, snail, ladybird (lbx), nkx6–2, and lhx2/9, also displayed decreased expression (Fig. 1f; Extended Data Fig. 1g; SI Table 1). These genes were expressed in BWM, and at least partially, with myoD (Extended Data Fig. 2a–e). snail, lbx, and nkx6–2 RNAi did not cause major muscle phenotypes (Extended Data Fig. 2f), but these TFs might still regulate longitudinal fiber biology. A subset of PCGs were co-expressed with myoD+ and significantly reduced in myoD(RNAi) animals (Fig. 1f,g; Extended Data Fig. 3 and Table 1; SI Table 1), indicating that some patterning genes are predominantly expressed in longitudinal muscle fibers.
We utilized myoD RNAi to examine the role of longitudinal fibers in regeneration. Previous studies showed a range of regeneration defects in myoD(RNAi) animals, such as pointed blastemas (regenerative outgrowths) for unknown reasons11,12. We optimized a myoD RNAi protocol that resulted in an essentially complete block of regeneration following amputation (Fig. 2a). Animals contracted wounds (Extended Data Fig. 4a) but failed to regenerate anterior (notum+) or posterior (wnt1+) poles (Extended Data Fig. 4b,c), which are essential for blastema patterning13–15.
Planarian regeneration and tissue turnover require neoblasts, a proliferating cell population containing pluripotent stem cells. Accordingly, numerous regeneration-abnormal phenotypes are explained by neoblast defects. Regeneration failure in myoD(RNAi) animals, however, was not caused by general neoblast dysfunction. Neoblasts differentiated into neurons (ChAT+) and muscle (collagen+) in myoD(RNAi) fragments that failed to regenerate 30 days post-head and tail amputation (Fig. 2b); however, neoblasts in these headless fragments did not generate eye progenitors (Extended Data Fig. 4d). Moreover, myoD(RNAi) animals regenerated eyes following eye resection (Extended Data Fig. 4e), a small injury that does not elicit sustained neoblast proliferation or require restoration of missing positional information for repair, but still requires neoblast differentiation16. In conclusion, myoD(RNAi) animals are fully capable of generating new tissues during tissue turnover and small injury repair, but completely fail to regenerate missing tissues following amputation.
Regeneration in planarians follows several phases. There is an initial “wound response”, occurring at essentially all injuries, associated with rapid wound-induced gene expression (3–12h post-wounding)17,18. Subsequently, and only with injuries removing substantial tissue, additional events occur that collectively comprise the “regenerative response” (~24–48h post-amputation, hpa). These events include persistent wound-induced gene expression, patterning gene expression domain regeneration in muscle, sustained neoblast proliferation and accumulation at wounds, and body-wide elevated apoptosis17–20. Soon after these changes, new differentiated cell types emerge (~72hpa) and blastema growth and patterning ensues. Because of the striking regeneration failure in myoD(RNAi) animals, we reasoned some aspect of these early regeneration steps likely requires myoD and/or longitudinal muscle fibers.
Many planarian wound-induced genes are expressed in the epidermis, neoblasts, or muscle17,18. myoD was not required for epidermis, neoblast, or most muscle wound-induced (6hpa) gene expression (wntless, inhibin, wnt1, and nlg-1) (Extended Data Fig. 4f). However, a marked reduction in muscle wound-induced expression of notum and follistatin was observed in myoD(RNAi) animals at multiple timepoints post-amputation and concomitantly with longitudinal-fiber loss (Fig. 2c; Extended Data Fig. 4g). Furthermore, wound-induced follistatin and notum expression was greatly enriched in myoD+ cells (Fig. 2d) compared to other muscle wound-induced genes (Extended Data Fig. 5a). These data indicate that notum and follistatin are unique among wound-induced genes in that they are restricted to longitudinal fibers.
The effect of myoD RNAi on follistatin and notum was particularly revealing, because these genes have critical regeneration roles. notum encodes a Wnt-inhibitory deacylase21,22 and controls the planarian head-versus-tail decision following amputation. notum is preferentially expressed at anterior over posterior-facing wounds17,23. follistatin encodes a TGF-beta inhibitor required for sustained wound-induced gene expression and elevated neoblast proliferation during the regenerative response24. follistatin RNAi24,25, like myoD RNAi, resulted in regeneration failure but allowed tissue turnover.
To further assess similarities between the myoD and follistatin RNAi phenotypes, we performed RNA-sequencing on anterior-facing wounds during the wound and regenerative regeneration responses (SI Table 1). Although most wound-induced genes were expressed normally following myoD and follistatin RNAi at 6hpa, most showed a significant drop in expression in both conditions at later timepoints (24–48hpa, regenerative response) (Fig. 2e,f; Extended Data Fig. 5b). Sustained neoblast proliferation and accumulation at wounds (~48hpa), detected as increased neoblast signature transcripts at wounds, was lacking in both myoD and follistatin RNAi animals (Fig. 2e,f; Extended Data Fig. 5c).
We next assessed positional information regeneration in myoD(RNAi) animals. Initially following amputation, tail fragments only express posterior PCGs. By 48hpa, posterior PCG expression restricts posteriorly and anterior PCG expression initiates, to reconstitute normal PCG expression domains. PCG expression domain regeneration in muscle did not occur in myoD and follistatin RNAi animals (Fig. 2e–g; Extended Data Fig. 6a; 26). Taken together, we conclude that myoD and longitudinal muscle fibers are required for the regenerative response.
Follistatin negatively regulates Activins (TGF-beta signaling ligands) and activin inhibition suppressed the follistatin(RNAi) regeneration defect24,25. To test whether failed follistatin expression is responsible for regeneration failure in myoD(RNAi) animals, we inhibited both myoD and activin-1. After short-term RNAi of both myoD and activin-1, animals regenerated (23/25, with 9/23 being cyclopic, versus 6/24 for myoD; control animals, Fig. 2h). Regeneration included PCG expression re-scaling and anterior pole generation (Extended Data Fig. 6b). Reduced longitudinal fiber numbers and snail expression (a myoD target) were comparable in double myoD; activin-1(RNAi) and myoD; control(RNAi) animals (Fig. 2i; Extended Data Fig. 6c). Following long-term myoD RNAi, activin-1 inhibition did not rescue regeneration (Extended Data Fig. 6d), suggesting some longitudinal muscle fibers are required for blastema formation. β-catenin-1 RNAi causes ectopic head regeneration at wounds, but did not restore head regeneration following myoD RNAi (Extended Data Fig. 6e). The activin-1 suppression data demonstrate that failed regeneration in myoD(RNAi) animals is not simply explained by muscle contractility dysfunction, but instead by a regulatory role of longitudinal muscle fibers at wounds.
Because follistatin wound-induced expression was longitudinal fiber-specific, transverse wounds might elicit more follistatin expression than sagittal wounds. Indeed, this occurred for follistatin, but not for other non-longitudinal fiber-specific wound-induced genes (Fig. 2j; Extended Data Fig. 7a,b). Moreover, sagittally amputated myoD(RNAi) animals showed variable regeneration defects (Extended Data Fig. 7c).
The results described above demonstrate an essential and specific regeneration role for a particular muscle fiber class. This raises the question of how other muscle fibers are specified, and whether they have other regeneration roles. Mining previously reported single-muscle-cell RNA-seq data27, we identified a muscle-expressed gene encoding an NK1 homeodomain TF (nkx1-1) homologous to Drosophila Slouch (Extended Data Fig. 1g). Like nautilus, slouch is required for the formation of another subset of Drosophila muscles28. Like myoD, nkx1-1 was predominantly expressed in collagen+ BWM cells, with a minor fraction expressed in neoblasts (Fig. 3a; Extended Data Fig. 8a,b). nkx1-1 was expressed in a subset of BWM cells (43%), distinct from myoD+ cells (Fig. 3a; Extended Data Fig. 2e), suggesting roles for these genes in different muscle cell subsets.
Whereas myoD inhibition resulted in thinner animals, nkx1-1 RNAi resulted in wider animals (Fig. 3b; Extended Data Fig. 8c). nkx1-1(RNAi) animals displayed a severe decrease of circular fibers, whereas longitudinal and diagonal fibers remained essentially unaffected (Fig. 3c; Extended Data Fig. 8d,e; SI video 3). Electron microscopy confirmed this circular fiber-specific phenotype (Fig. 3d). RNA-seq analysis of nkx1-1(RNAi) animals detected, like following myoD RNAi, general muscle-specific gene expression reduction (Extended Data Fig. 8f). Most PCGs were unaffected (SI Table 1) and single-muscle-cell RNA-seq showed that they were not exclusively expressed in nkx1-1+ muscle cells (Extended Data Fig. 2e). Extensive FISH analysis (Extended Data Table 1), however, revealed that wnt11-1 was predominantly expressed in nkx1-1+ cells and that wnt11-1 and activin-2 were reduced in nkx1-1(RNAi) animals (Extended Data Fig. 8g).
To determine the regeneration role of nkx1-1 and circular muscle fibers, RNAi animals were subjected to head and tail amputation. nkx1-1(RNAi) trunk fragments normally contracted wounds and regenerated heads with widely spaced eyes and indented tails (Extended Data Fig. 9a,b). Surprisingly, some nkx1-1(RNAi) animals regenerated a bifurcated AP axis with two merged heads within a single blastema (Fig. 3e). Head blastemas had numerous abnormalities (Fig. 3f,g), including ectopic eyes, supernumerary ectopic gut branches, and wider cephalic ganglia (Fig. 3g; Extended Data Fig. 9c). An ectopic brain lobe occasionally formed (SI videos 4 and 5). In addition, animals displayed broader midline gene expression domains and, in extreme cases, midline duplication with duplicated anterior poles (Fig. 3g).
At 72hpa, all nkx1-1(RNAi) animals had dramatically wider regenerating anterior poles (Fig. 3f), suggesting that wider regenerating poles coalesced into two independent anterior poles. These 72h blastemas showed aberrant muscle fiber organization, with reduced circular fibers and lacking constricted muscle fibers towards the pole (Extended Data Fig. 9d). Because the pole acts as an organizer promoting midline regeneration, a plane around which bilateral symmetry is established13, we suggest that split anterior poles organize formation of two midlines, explaining duplicated heads in nkx1-1(RNAi) animals. nkx1-1(RNAi) animals regenerated following sagittal amputations with a similar abnormal phenotype (Extended Data Fig. 9e).
Because planarian muscle provides positional information required for patterning, muscle fiber loss might result in aberrant patterning during tissue turnover. Double myoD; nkx1-1 RNAi animals had dramatically reduced BWM fibers but not other muscle types (Fig. 4a; Extended Data Fig. 10a–d; SI video 6). These animals displayed ectopic posterior eyes (Fig. 4a), indicating that exclusive BWM disruption is sufficient to affect normal patterning. Expression of several PCGs was defective in myoD; nkx1-1 RNAi animals (Fig. 4b; Extended Data Fig. 10e), including ndk, fz5/8–4, and ndl genes, which are required for eye patterning. Double myoD; nkx1-1 RNAi animals eventually lysed by 12–20 weeks of RNAi (Extended Data Fig. 10f,g), indicating disruption of body integrity with BWM loss.
In conclusion, we found distinct regeneration regulatory roles for different planarian muscle fibers. myoD, a well-characterized vertebrate myogenic factor, does not have a general planarian myogenesis role. Instead, myoD specifies a BWM cell subset: the longitudinal fibers (Fig. 4c). A second TF-encoding gene, nkx1-1, specified another planarian BWM subset: the circular fibers. Our results suggest that in planarians, similarly to Drosophila, different TFs specify distinct muscle subsets. Importantly, these genes provided tools to reveal distinct roles for longitudinal and circular muscle fibers. Circular fibers were required for proper ML regeneration, with two heads emerging instead of one following circular fiber reduction. Longitudinal fibers were required to initiate the regeneration program. Animals lacking longitudinal fibers could not reestablish positional information in muscle and lacked stem cell responses to injury, despite being fully capable of tissue turnover. Simultaneous loss of both fiber classes led to homeostatic patterning defects. We conclude that, in addition to contraction, different muscle fibers have specific regulatory roles in orchestrating the process of regeneration in planarians.
Methods
Animals
Asexual Schmidtea mediterranea strain (CIW4) animals starved 7–14 days prior experiments were used.
mRNA-seq experiments
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Life Technologies) from single animals (uninjured myoD and nkx1-1 RNAi animals) or 5 pooled anterior wound sites from tail fragments (myoD and follistatin timecourse). Libraries were prepared using the Kapa Stranded mRNA-Seq Kit Illumina Platform (KapaBiosystems). Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Hi-Seq. fst_00_48_wiF_1 library was removed from further analysis because of high human sequence contamination. Libraries were mapped to the dd_Smed_v4 transcriptome (http://planmine.mpi-cbg.de; 29) using bowtie 130 with -best alignment parameter. Reads from the same isotig were summed to generate raw read counts for each transcript. Pair-wise differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq291. Expression values from DESeq normalization were scaled to generate z-scores for heatmaps and these z-scores were averaged for sets of genes (17; AUC > 0.80) for summary figures. Pheatmap was used to generate scaled heatmaps.
Gene cloning and whole-mount in situ hybridizations
nkx1-1 was amplified using the following primers: fwd 5’ ATTCCAAGTCAAACGATAAGCCT; rv 5’ TTCCGTTGGTATTTCTTTAACGG and myoD was amplified using the following primers: fwd 5’ TCAACAATACCGATCCAGCCC; rv 5’ TCGGGCTTAGCGTCCATTG. Both constructs were cloned from cDNA into the pGEM vector (Promega). These constructs have been used to synthesized RNA probes and dsRNA for RNAi experiments. RNA probes were synthesized and whole-mount fluorescence in situ hybridizations (FISH) were performed as described27. Light images were taken with a Zeiss Discovery Microscope. Fluorescent images were taken with a Zeiss LSM700 Confocal Microscope using ZEN software. Co-localization analyses of FISH signals were performed using Fiji/ImageJ. For each channel, histograms of fluorescence intensity were used to determine the cut-off between signal and background. All FISH images shown are maximal intensity projections and representative of all images taken in each condition.
RNAi
dsRNA was prepared from in vitro transcription reactions (Promega) using PCR-generated templates with flanking T7 promoters, followed by ethanol precipitation, and annealed after resuspension in water. Concentration of dsRNA varied in each prep between 4 and 7 μg/ml. dsRNA was then mixed with planarian food (liver)32 and 2 μl of this mixture per animal (liver containing dsRNA) was used in feedings. For homeostasis experiments the following feeding protocol was used: animals were fed six times in three weeks, and then fed four to ten times once a week. Animals were then fixed seven days after the last feeding. For regeneration experiments animals were fed twice a week with a total number of RNAi feedings variable depending on the experiment (indicated in the Figures) and then amputated into three pieces (head, trunk and tail pieces) a week after the last RNAi feeding. Seven or nine days following amputation, trunk pieces were scored, and fixed for further analysis. For sagittal amputations, regenerating animals were scored 11 days post amputation. For all RNAi conditions tested, the total amount of dsRNA per feeding per animal was kept constant as described before27. For RNA-seq experiments in intact animals, control, myoD, and nkx1-1 RNAi animals were fed 10 times; for wound-induced RNA-seq experiments: control and myoD RNAi animals were fed eight times in four weeks, control and follistatin RNAi animals were fed six times in three weeks. For the β-catenin-1 suppression experiment, myoD RNAi animals were fed six times in three weeks and one extra feeding of either control or β-catenin-1 dsRNA was performed in the third week. Animals were then amputated the same day of the last feeding and scored at different timepoints as indicated in the Figure.
Immunostainings
Animals were fixed as for in situ hybridizations and then treated as described27. An anti-muscle mouse monoclonal antibody 6G1033 was used in a 1:1000 dilution, an anti-muscle rabbit polyclonal antibody V5277 (identified from reactivity of serum to muscle from an animal injected with an unrelated protein, Cintillo) was used in a 1:500 dilution, and an anti-mouse or rabbit Alexa conjugated antibody (Life Tech) was used in a 1:500 dilution.
Phylogenetic analysis
NKX and Netrin trees show 105 Homeobox and 20 Netrin family proteins, respectively, from diverse organisms. Trees were based on previous reports34,35. Protein sequences were aligned using MUSCLE with default settings and trimmed with Gblocks. Maximum likelihood analyses were run using PhyML with 100 or 1000 bootstrap replicates, the WAG model of amino acid substitution, four substitution rate categories and the proportion of invariable sites estimated from the dataset. Trees were visualized in FigTree. Accession numbers of proteins used to generate the phylogenetic trees can be found in SI Table 2.
Transmission electron microscopy
Animals were kept on ice for 10 min before fixation with cold 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 3% paraformaldehyde with 5% sucrose in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) overnight, then post-fixed in 1% OsO4 in veronal-acetate buffer. Animals were stained overnight with 0.5% uranyl acetate in veronal-acetate buffer (pH 6.0), dehydrated, and embedded in Spurr’s resin. Transverse sections were cut on a Reichert Ultracut E microtome with a Diatome diamond knife at a thickness setting of 50 nm then stained with 2% uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The sections were examined using a FEI Tecnai spirit at 80 KV and photographed with an AMT CCD camera. All images were taken on the ventral BWM at 6800X. Muscle fibers were traced by hand and pseudocolored by the fiber orientation, size, and distance from the subepidermal membrane. Circular fibers were defined as the outermost layer adjacent to the subepidermal membrane with myosin fibers running sagittal to the plane of section, and pseudocolor in magenta. Longitudinal fibers on the ventral side were thick, and myosin fibers were transversal to the plane of section and pseudocolored in green. All other identifiable muscle fibers were pseudocolored in yellow. For visualization ease, images were blurred with ImageJ’s smooth function.
Quantifications and statistical analysis
Numbers of fibers, follistatin+, and notum+ cells were counted per animal within the regions indicated in the cartoons next to the graphs. Ratios (length to width, distance between the eyes to total length or wound-induced follistatin+ to nlg-1+ or inhibin+ cells) were calculated per animal as indicated in their respective graphs. Numbers of follistatin+, nlg-1+, or inhibin+ cells at incisions were counted and normalized by mm of wound length using DAPI signal. Unpaired two-tailed Student-t- test was used to determine significant differences between two different conditions, and one-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, when analyzing more than two conditions. Mean ± SD is shown in all graphs. A linear regression using all values generated from different RNAi feedings (2, 4, 8, and 11) of control and myoD RNAi animals was calculated in Extended Data Fig. 4g. ns, not significant.
Data Availability
mRNA-seq data have been deposited in GEO with the GSE99067 accession number. Gene sequences have been deposited in GenBank, accession numbers MF070478–80. Accession numbers of reported data used in this study are: PRJNA276084 and GSE74360. Accession numbers used in phylogenetic analysis are listed in SI Table 2.
Extended Data
Extended data includes Methods, Extended data Figures 1–11, and can be found with this article online.
Extended data Table 1. Patterning gene expression in different body wall muscle fibers by FISH.
Name | Contig | Co- expression in myoD+ fibers |
Co- Expression in nkx1–1+ fibers |
Markedly reduced in myoD(RNAi) animals |
Markedly reduced in nkx1–1(RNAi) animals |
Markedly reduced in myoD, nkx1- 1(RNA1)animals |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smed-ndl-2 | dd_Smed_v4_8340_0_1 | Some | Some | no | no | yes |
Smed-nld-3 | dd_Smed_v4_6604_0_1 | na | na | no | na | yes |
Smed-sFRP-1 | dd_Smed_v4_13985_0_1 | na | na | no | no | no |
Smed wnt11–2 | dd_Smed_v4_16209_0_1 | na | na | na | na | yes |
Smed-wnt11–1 | dd_Smed_v4_14391_0_1 | None | High | no | yes | yes |
Smed-wntP-2 | dd_Smed_v4_7326_0_1 | Some | Some | no | na | yes |
Smed-netrin-2 | dd_Smed_v4_14852_0_1 | High | nd | yes | no | na |
Smed-nlg-7 | dd_Smed_v4_10469_0_1 | High | Low | yes | no | na |
Smed-bmp | dd_Smed_v4_17402_0_1 | Some | Some | some reduction | no | yes |
Smed-netrin-1 | dd_Smed_v4_9795_0_1 | Low | Some | no | no | na |
Smed-wnt2 | dd_Smed_v4_13487_0_1 | na | na | na | no | na |
Smed-activin-2 | dd_Smed_v4_3324_0_1 | na | High | na | yes | na |
Smed-nlg-8 | dd_Smed_v4_8738_0_1 | Some | Some | na | no | na |
Smed-SFRP-2 | dd_Smed_v4_8832_0_1 | na | na | na | no | yes |
Smed-netrin-3 | dd_Smed_v4_18181_0_1 | High | nd | yes | no | na |
Smed-slit | dd_Smed_v4_12111_0_1 | Some | nd | yes | no | na |
Smed-admp | dd_Smed_v4_12939_2_1 | High | Low | yes | no | na |
Smed-netrin-5 | dd_Smed_v4_9737_0_1 | Low | Some | no | no | na |
Smed-inhibin | dd_Smed_v4_7607_0_1 | Some (wi) | Some (wi) | no | no | na |
Smed-nlg-1 | dd_Smed_v4_14068_0_1 | Some (wi) | Some (wi) | no | no | na |
Smed-notum | dd_Smed_v4_24180_0_1 | High (wi) | nd | yes | na | na |
Smed-follistatin | dd_Smed_v4_9584_0_1 | High (wi) | nd | yes | na | na |
Smed-wntless | dd_Smed_v4_11629_0_1 | Some (wi) | Some (wi) | no | na | na |
nd: not determined
na: not assayed
wi: wound-induced
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Nicki Watson (Whitehead W. M. Keck Microscopy Facility) and Anthony Mahowald for TEM imaging, Sam LoCascio for eye resections, Chun-Chieh Chen for V5277, Meredith Fedorovsky for illustrations. We acknowledge support by NIH R01GM080639. We thank the Eleanor Schwartz Charitable Foundation for support. PWR is an Investigator of HHMI and an associate member of the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT.
Footnotes
Authors have no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Petersen CP & Reddien PW Smed-βcatenin-1 is required for anteroposterior blastema polarity in planarian regeneration. Science 319, 327–330, (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gurley KA, Rink JC & Sánchez Alvarado A βcatenin defines head versus tail identity during planarian regeneration and homeostasis. Science 319, 323–327, (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iglesias M, Gomez-Skarmeta JL, Saló E & Adell T Silencing of Smed-β catenin1 generates radial-like hypercephalized planarians. Development 135, 1215–1221, (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Witchley JN, Mayer M, Wagner DE, Owen JH & Reddien PW Muscle cells provide instructions for planarian regeneration. Cell Reports 4, 633–641, (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cebrià F, Vispo M, Newmark P, Bueno D & Romero R Myocyte differentiation and body wall muscle regeneration in the planarian Girardia tigrina. Dev Genes Evol 207, 306–316, (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cebrià F Planarian Body-Wall Muscle: Regeneration and function beyond a simple skeletal support. Front Cell Dev Biol 4, 8, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Buckingham M & Rigby PW Gene regulatory networks and transcriptional mechanisms that control myogenesis. Dev Cell 28, 225–238, (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kassar-Duchossoy L et al. Mrf4 determines skeletal muscle identity in Myf5:Myod double-mutant mice. Nature 431, 466–471, (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baugh LR & Hunter CP MyoD, modularity, and myogenesis: conservation of regulators and redundancy in C. elegans. Genes Dev 20, 3342–3346, (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Balagopalan L, Keller CA & Abmayr SM Loss-of-function mutations reveal that the Drosophila nautilus gene is not essential for embryonic myogenesis or viability. Dev Biol 231, 374–382, (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reddien PW, Bermange AL, Murfitt KJ, Jennings JR & Sánchez Alvarado A Identification of genes needed for regeneration, stem cell function, and tissue homeostasis by systematic gene perturbation in planaria. Dev Cell 8, 635–649, (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cowles MW et al. Genome-wide analysis of the bHLH gene family in planarians identifies factors required for adult neurogenesis and neuronal regeneration. Development 140, 4691–4702, (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Scimone ML, Lapan SW & Reddien PW A forkhead transcription factor is wound-induced at the planarian midline and required for anterior pole regeneration. PLoS Genet 10, e1003999, (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vogg MC et al. Stem cell-dependent formation of a functional anterior regeneration pole in planarians requires Zic and Forkhead transcription factors. Dev Biol 390, 136–148, (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vásquez-Doorman C & Petersen CP zic-1 Expression in Planarian neoblasts after injury controls anterior pole regeneration. PLoS Genet 10, e1004452, (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.LoCascio SA, Lapan SW & Reddien PW Eye absence does not regulate planarian stem cells during eye regeneration. Dev Cell 40, 381–391, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wurtzel O et al. A generic and cell-type-specific wound response precedes regeneration in planarians. Dev Cell 35, 632–645, (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wenemoser D, Lapan SW, Wilkinson AW, Bell GW & Reddien PW A molecular wound response program associated with regeneration initiation in planarians. Genes Dev 26, 988–1002, (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wenemoser D & Reddien PW Planarian regeneration involves distinct stem cell responses to wounds and tissue absence. Dev Biol 344, 979–991, (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pellettieri J et al. Cell death and tissue remodeling in planarian regeneration. Dev Biol 338, 76–85, (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kakugawa S et al. Notum deacylates Wnt proteins to suppress signalling activity. Nature 519, 187–192, (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang X et al. Notum is required for neural and head induction via Wnt deacylation, oxidation, and inactivation. Dev Cell 32, 719–730, (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Petersen CP & Reddien PW Polarized notum activation at wounds inhibits Wnt function to promote planarian head regeneration. Science 332, 852–855, (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gaviño MA, Wenemoser D, Wang IE & Reddien PW Tissue absence initiates regeneration through Follistatin-mediated inhibition of Activin signaling. eLife 2, (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roberts-Galbraith RH & Newmark PA Follistatin antagonizes activin signaling and acts with notum to direct planarian head regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 1363–1368, (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Adler CE & Sánchez Alvarado A PHRED-1 is a divergent neurexin-1 homolog that organizes muscle fibers and patterns organs during regeneration. Dev Biol 427, 165–175, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Scimone ML, Cote LE, Rogers T & Reddien PW Two FGFRL-Wnt circuits organize the planarian anteroposterior axis. eLife 5, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Knirr S, Azpiazu N & Frasch M The role of the NK-homeobox gene slouch (S59) in somatic muscle patterning. Development 126, 4525–4535 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu SY et al. Reactivating head regrowth in a regeneration-deficient planarian species. Nature 500, 81–84, (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M & Salzberg SL Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10, (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Anders S & Huber W Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11, (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rouhana L et al. RNA interference by feeding in vitro-synthesized double-stranded RNA to planarians: methodology and dynamics. Developmental dynamics 242, 718–730, (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ross KG et al. Novel monoclonal antibodies to study tissue regeneration in planarians. BMC Dev Biol 15, 2, (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schierwater B et al. The early ANTP gene repertoire: Insights from the placozoan genome. PLoS ONE, 3, e2457, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002457 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fahey B and Degnan BM Origin and evolution of laminin gene family diversity. MBE, 29, 1823–1836, (2012), doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Scimone ML, Kravarik KM, Lapan S and Reddien PW Neoblast specialization in regeneration of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Stem Cell Reports, 3, 359–52, (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Baguñà J & Romero R Quantitative analysis of cell types during growth, degrowth and regeneration in the planarians Dugesia mediterranea and Dugesia tigrina. Hydrobiologia 84, 181–194, (1981). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
mRNA-seq data have been deposited in GEO with the GSE99067 accession number. Gene sequences have been deposited in GenBank, accession numbers MF070478–80. Accession numbers of reported data used in this study are: PRJNA276084 and GSE74360. Accession numbers used in phylogenetic analysis are listed in SI Table 2.