Skip to main content
Federal Practitioner logoLink to Federal Practitioner
. 2018 Aug;35(8):12–21.

Access to Transplant Care and Services Within the Veterans Health Administration

William Gunnar 1,, Douglas A Bronson 1, Sandra A Cupples 1
PMCID: PMC6263447  PMID: 30766376

Abstract

The VHA provides timely solid organ transplant care and services with outcomes comparable to that of nationally reported estimates.


The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides health care services to over 9 million eligible and enrolled veterans out of a US veteran population of 18.9 million.1 In 2014, an Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigation identified timely access to health care within the VHA as a serious concern.2 In direct response, Congress enacted the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act (VACAA) of 2014 to expand access to care options available to veterans through referral to non-VA community care providers when the veteran is waiting longer than 30 days for an outpatient appointment or services, resides a significant distance (≥ 40 miles) from a VA facility, or experiences an undue burden to receive care and services.3 The VHA also responded, implementing several initiatives to improve veteran access to VHA health care generally, including the MyVA transformation and the proliferation of connected health technology; including telehealth capability and the expanded use of secure messaging. 46

This study examined veterans’ access to the VA transplant program (VATP) for fiscal year (FY 2014 to FY 2016). Timeliness of services and outcomes in relationship to the distance from a VA transplant center (VATC) were evaluated.

METHODS

The VATP comprises the following VATCs: 5 heart (Madison, Wisconsin; Nashville, Tennessee; Palo Alto, California; Richmond, Virginia; and Salt Lake City, Utah); 7 kidney (Birmingham, Alabama; Bronx, New York; Houston, Texas; Iowa City, Iowa; Nashville, Tennessee; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Portland, Oregon); 6 liver (Houston, Texas; Madison, Wisconsin; Nashville, Tennessee; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Portland, Oregon; and Richmond, Virginia); and 2 lung (Madison, Wisconsin; and Seattle, Washington).

In 2012, the VHA published a policy to establish timeliness standards for a VATC initial review decision and referral evaluation.7 In 2013, the VHA National Surgery Office (NSO) implemented a secure intranet-based application called TRACER to facilitate the referral process and track timeliness of initial review decision, evaluation, United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) waitlisting, and transplantation.

The referral process is as follows: The referring VA medical facility submits veteran candidate health information into TRACER, selects a VATC, and then TRACER notifies the VATC. The VATC reviews the information and submits an initial review decision as to whether the clinical information supports further evaluation within 48 hours for an emergency referral and 5 business days for a stable referral. If accepted, the VATC completes an evaluation within 30 calendar days of the referral submission date. On evaluation and acceptance, the VATC accepts handoff for transplant-related care, orders additional testing as needed, and waitlists the veteran with UNOS when the clinical status is deemed appropriate.4

The TRACER data from 3 separate cohorts were analyzed from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2016, with a follow-up event capture through March 31, 2017: (1) the referral cohort, representing all referrals to the VATP; (2) the waitlist cohort, representing those undergoing initial UNOS waitlisting; and (3) the transplant cohort, representing those receiving a solid organ transplant. The straight-line distance between the referring VA medical facility and the VATC was determined for each referral and categorized as follows: less than 100 miles, 100 to 300 miles, 301 to 500 miles, and greater than 500 miles.

Mortality outcomes in the TRACER database were confirmed using the VHA Vital Status file, which combines the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Social Security Administration, and VHA internal utilization data to determine a best source, including flagging of records that indicate a death date followed by use of VA services.8,9 Records flagged with VA use after death were not considered deaths in this analysis. The NSO regularly refreshes veteran vital status information in the TRACER database for analysis of long-term outcomes.

The analysis methods for this study included Kruskall-Wallis nonparametric 1-way analysis of variance to compare timeliness metrics by distance group, Fine and Gray competing risks models to compare mortality on the UNOS list by distance group, and log-rank and Wilcoxon-Gehan tests to compare patient survival distributions by distance group.1014 Analysis was generated using SAS software, version 9.4 (Cary, North Carolina) as well as the R statistical software application (r-project.org. ).15 Publicly available solid organ transplant survival rates were obtained from the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR).16

RESULTS

For FY 2014 to FY 2016, the referral cohort identified 6,009 veteran referrals to a VATC for solid organ transplant of which 3,500 underwent an evaluation, and 2,137 were wait-listed for solid organ transplant with UNOS (Table 1). Overall, 9.6% of referrals, 13.8% of evaluations, and 15.8% of those waitlisted were from VA referring centers less than 100 miles of the VATC. Alternatively, 37.2% of referrals, 33.3% of evaluations, and 30.4% of waitlistings were assigned a referral distance of greater than 500 miles. This suggests that a referral distance less than 100 miles provides a small but measurable positive benefit, whereas a referral distance of greater than 500 miles impacts the veteran negatively. Further analysis of the 577 referrals from less than 100 miles determined that 456 (79.0%) originate from the VATC as a direct referral. Of the 338 wait-listed referrals less than 100 miles, only 53 (15.7%) were from a separate VA medical facility, indicating a preference for VATCs to process direct referrals in a manner that promotes waitlisting.

TABLE 1.

Referrals, Evaluations, and Veterans Waitlisted by Distance, Fiscal Years 2014 to 2016

Distance, miles Referrals, No. (%) Evaluations, No. (%) Listings, No. (%)
Heart
 < 100 51 (10.8) 43 (14.1) 22 (16.2)
 100–300 144 (30.6) 84 (27.5) 39 (28.7)
 301–500 106 (22.5) 73 (23.9) 27 (19.9)
 > 500 170 (36.1) 106 (34.6) 48 (35.3)
 All distances 471 306 136

Kidney
 < 100 276 (8.4) 230 (11.8) 164 (12.8)
 100–300 964 (29.4) 592 (30.3) 390 (30.5)
 301–500 869 (26.5) 456 (23.3) 313 (24.5)
 > 500 1,167 (35.6) 675 (34.6) 413 (32.3)
 All distances 3,276 1,953 1,280

Liver
 < 100 235 (12.6) 203 (18.6) 146 (22.0)
 100–300 642 (34.4) 386 (35.3) 237 (35.7)
 301–500 371 (19.9) 212 (19.4) 127 (19.1)
 > 500 619 (33.2) 292 (26.7) 154 (23.2)
 All distances 1,867 1,093 664

Lung
 < 100 15 (3.8) 7 (4.7) 6 (10.5)
 100–300 38 (9.6) 20 (13.5) 4 (7.0)
 301–500 64 (16.2) 29 (19.6) 12 (21.1)
 > 500 278 (70.4) 92 (62.2) 35 (61.4)
 All distances 395 148 57

All organs
 < 100 577 (9.6) 483 (13.8) 338 (15.8)
 100–300 1,788 (29.8) 1,082 (30.9) 670 (31.4)
 301–500 1,410 (23.5) 770 (22.0) 479 (22.4)
 > 500 2,234 (37.2) 1,165 (33.3) 650 (30.4)
 All distances 6,009 3,500 2,137

For the study period, 6,009 referrals resulted in 188 emergency initial review decisions and 3,551 stable initial review decisions with an eligible declaration (Table 2). The median time for emergency referral initial review decision was 5 hours, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 2 to 22 hours. Fourteen emergency initial review decisions (5.2%) were submitted by the VATC beyond the 48 hours mandated by policy. The median time for stable referral initial review decision was 3 business days (IQR 2–5 d) with 650 stable initial review decisions (12.5%) submitted beyond the 5 business days mandated by policy. In FY 2016, all 90 emergency referrals received an initial review decision within 48 hours, and all but 169 (8.6%) of stable referrals received an initial review decision within 5 business days, representing an improvement over FY 2014 and FY 2015.

TABLE 2.

Timeliness of Referral, Initial Decision Review, Evaluation, and Waitlisting

Referrals Emergency Reviews Stable Reviews Evaluations Listings
Distances, miles Submitted Closed After Referral Discontinued Total Decisions Eligible Decisions Closed After Decision > 48 h, No. (%) Median, h IQR, h Total Decisions Eligible Decisions Closed After Decision > 5 Bus. Days, No. (%) Median Bus. Days (IQR) Completed Closed After Evaluation Telehealth, No. (%) > 30 Days, No. (%) Median Days (IQR) Completed Median Days (IQR)
FY 2014
< 100 173 - 7 9 9 1 - 0 0–2 157 139 4 15 (9.6) 2 (1–3) 143 31 2 (1.4) 31 (21.7) 22 (11–29) 106 69 (31–119)
100–300 538 - 81 25 18 1 2 (8.0) 1 1–17 432 298 16 77 (17.8) 3 (2–5) 299 88 50 (16.7) 131 (43.8) 29 (22–44) 197 91 (45–159)
301–500 406 1 47 22 18 2 1 (4.5) 5 2–22 336 225 10 71 (21.1) 4 (2–5) 231 70 30 (13.0) 96 (41.6) 29 (24–44) 152 98 (57–220)
> 500 729 2 77 26 21 4 3 (11.5) 16 2–39 624 379 23 91 (14.6) 3 (2–5) 372 138 57 (15.3) 220 (59.1) 35 (26–54) 209 98 (61–220)
All distances 1,846 3 212 82 66 8 6 (7.3) 3 1–20 1,549 1,041 53 254 (16.4) 3 (2–5) 1,045 327 139 (13.3) 478 (45.7) 30 (22–48) 664 90 (49–182)

FY 2015
< 100 185 1 4 13 11 - - 2 1–6 167 151 9 11 (6.6) 1 (1–3) 153 30 0 (0.0) 26 (17.0) 20 (9–28) 112 45 (24–91)
100–300 545 1 40 25 17 - 2 (8.0) 4 1–23 479 338 18 72 (15.0) 3 (2–5) 337 98 72 (21.4) 71 (21.1) 26 (20–29) 209 84 (37–154)
301–500 466 2 33 23 16 3 1 (4.3) 3 1–24 408 262 22 82 (20.1) 3 (2–5) 253 70 51 (20.2) 69 (27.3) 27 (22–32) 164 89 (63–190)
> 500 734 2 69 34 18 4 5 (14.7) 17 3–22 629 396 19 62 (9.9) 3 (2–4) 391 142 72 (18.4) 131 (33.5) 28 (22–36) 209 78 (47–144)
All distances 1,930 6 146 95 62 7 8 (8.4) 4 1–22 1,683 1,147 68 227 (13.5) 3 (2–4) 1,134 340 195 (17.2) 297 (26.2) 26 (20–32) 694 76 (39–152)

FY 2016
< 100 219 10 15 13 1 - 3 2–7 194 180 5 2 (1.0) 1 (1–2) 187 37 4 (2.1) 23 (12.3) 20 (10–27) 120 62 (32–109)
100–300 705 4 51 25 15 - - 17 4–27 625 453 22 67 (10.7) 3 (2–5) 446 117 87 (19.5) 58 (13.0) 26 (20–28) 264 73 (41–120)
301–500 538 3 44 16 11 2 - 13 3–23 475 305 28 42 (8.8) 2 (2–5) 286 78 59 (20.6) 37 (12.9) 26 (21–29) 163 78 (51–139)
> 500 771 2 63 34 21 9 - 4 3–8 672 425 35 58 (8.6) 3 (2–4) 402 112 71 (17.7) 55 (13.7) 26 (21–28) 232 68 (41–137)
All distances 2,233 9 168 90 60 12 - 6 3–23 1,966 1,363 90 169 (8.6) 3 (2–4) 1,321 344 221 (16.7) 173 (13.1) 25 (20–28) 779 70 (41–127)

All years
< 100 577 1 21 37 33 2 - 2 1–6 518 470 18 28 (5.4) 1 (1–3) 483 98 6 (1.2) 80 (16.6) 21 (10–28) 338 57 (31–106)
100–300 1,788 5 172 75 50 1 4 (5.3) 5 1–24 1,536 1,089 56 216 (14.1) 3 (2–5) 1,082 303 209 (19.3) 260 (24.0) 26 (20–30) 670 78 (42–143)
301–500 1,410 6 124 61 45 7 2 (3.3) 6 2–23 1,219 792 60 195 (16.0) 3 (2–5) 770 218 140 (18.2) 202 (26.2) 27 ( 22–32) 479 86 (56–173)
> 500 2,234 6 209 94 60 17 8 (8.5) 5 3–21 1,925 1,200 77 211 (11.0) 3 (2–4) 1,165 392 200 (17.2) 406 (34.8) 28 ( 22–39) 650 82 (47–161)
All distances 6,009 18 526 267 188 27 14 (5.2) 5 2–22 5,198 3,551 211 650 (12.5) 3 (2–5) 3,500 1,011 555 (15.9) 948 (27.1) 27 (21–32) 2,137 78 (43–148)

Abbreviations: bus., business; FY, fiscal year; IQR, interquartile range.

Three thousand five hundred evaluations were performed in a median time of 27 calendar days (IQR 21–32 d) with 948 (27.1%) performed beyond the policy mandated 30 calendar days. Telehealth was used for 555 evaluations (15.9%), primarily for referrals located greater than 100 miles from the VATC. In FY 2016, 13.1% of the 1,321 completed evaluations were performed beyond 30 calendar days, representing an improvement from prior years; 45.7% beyond 30 calendar days in FY 2014 and 26.2% beyond 30 days in FY 2015.

Of the 6,009 referrals submitted in FY 2014 to FY 2016, 2,137 were wait-listed with UNOS. The median time from referral to waitlisting was 78 calendar days (IQR 43–148 d) for the entire study period, decreasing from 90 calendar days in FY 2014 to 70 calendar days in FY 2016.

For all organs and most organ types, the time from referral to initial review decision, evaluation, and waitlisting was statistically less (P < .005) for referrals received from VA medical facilities located less than 100 miles compared with referrals received from VA medical facilities at least 100 miles from the VATC. No statistical difference was found for emergency initial review decision for heart (P = .72) and lung (P = .14), time to evaluation for lung (P = .14), and time to waitlisting for heart (P = .95).

The waitlist cohort data are shown in Table 3. For FY 2014 to FY 2016, 2,265 veterans were waitlisted with UNOS of which 144 (6.4%) died on the waitlist and 731 (32.3%) underwent transplantation. The waitlist mortality rate varied by organ type: heart 4.5%, kidney 4.5%, liver 10.6%, and lung 6.6%. The transplant rate for this cohort varied by organ type: heart 64.4%, kidney 17.2%, liver 52.9%, and lung 78.7%. The median time from initial waitlisting to transplantation was 157 days for all organs and varied by organ type: heart 162 days, kidney 255 days, liver 113 days, and lung 110 days.

TABLE 3.

Outcomes of Veterans Waitlisted With UNOS for Fiscal Years 2014 to 2016

Mortality on UNOS List Transplants Removed From VATC Listing
Initial UNOS Listings Count Time From Listing to Mortality, d Count Time From Listing to Transplant, d Overall Failure to Meet Criteria Patient Choice Mortality After TRACER Closure and Prior to 3/31/17 Mortality for Patients Not Transplanted at a VATC On the UNOS List at 3/31/17
Distances, miles No. (%) No. (%) Median IQR No. (%) Median IQR No. (%) No. No. No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
Heart
< 100 20 (15.2) 1 (5.0) 142 142–142 12 (60.0) 94 69–219 - - - - 1 (5.0) 7 (35.0)
100 to 300 43 (32.6) 4 (9.3) 259 119–492 25 (58.1) 133 37–236 5 (11.6) 3 2 2 (40.0) 6 (14.0) 9 (20.9)
301 to 500 26 (19.7) 1 (3.8) 232 232–232 15 (57.7) 190 77–348 0 0 0 - 1 (3.8) 10 (38.5)
> 500 43 (32.6) 0 - - 33 (76.7) 206 47–340 4 (9.3) 1 3 - 0 (0.0) 6 (14.0)
All distances 132 6 (4.5) 215 142–320 85 (64.4) 162 49–311 9 (6.8) 4 5 2 (22.2) 8 (6.1) 32 (24.2)

Kidney
< 100 152 (10.9) 10 (6.6) 339 214–560 21 (13.8) 397 121–780 13 (8.6) 12 1 1 (7.7) 11 (7.2) 108 (71.1)
100 to 300 409 (29.4) 18 (4.4) 199 103–551 62 (15.2) 245 133–549 59 (14.4) 27 32 9 (15.3) 27 (6.6) 270 (66.0)
301 to 500 346 (24.8) 16 (4.6) 428 284–606 54 (15.6) 246 84–663 59 (17.1) 29 30 4 (6.8) 20 (5.8) 217 (62.7)
> 500 486 (34.9) 18 (3.7) 383 108–590 102 (21.0) 256 115–457 85 (17.5) 47 38 6 (7.1) 24 (4.9) 281 (57.8)
All distances 1,393 62 (4.5) 342 142–560 239 (17.2) 255 113–571 216 (15.5) 115 101 20 (9.3) 82 (5.9) 876 (62.9)

Liver
< 100 146 (21.5) 14 (9.6) 44 21–326 83 (56.8) 123 29–353 25 (17.1) 22 3 11 (44.0) 25 (17.1) 24 (16.4)
100 to 300 246 (36.2) 28 (11.4) 123 56–243 139 (56.5) 126 22–245 36 (14.6) 28 8 19 (52.8) 47 (19.1) 43 (17.5)
301 to 500 125 (18.4) 15 (12.0) 208 96–322 59 (47.2) 129 27–279 21 (16.8) 16 5 8 (38.1) 23 (18.4) 30 (24.0)
> 500 162 (23.9) 15 (9.3) 323 36–517 78 (48.1) 80 15–200 27 (16.7) 23 4 19 (70.4) 34 (21.0) 42 (25.9)
All distances 679 72 (10.6) 139 43–323 359 (52.9) 113 24–263 109 (16.1) 89 20 57 (52.3) 129 (19.0) 139 (20.5)

Lung
< 100 8 (13.1) 0 - - 7 (87.5) 87 20–170 1 (12.5) 1 0 1 (100.0) 1 (12.5) -
100 to 300 6 (9.8) 1 (16.7) 128 128–128 4 (66.7) 128 71–168 1 (16.7) 1 0 1 (100.0) 2 (33.3) -
301 to 500 14 (23.0) 1 (7.1) 15 15–15 12 (85.7) 105 10–204 1 (7.1) 1 0 - 1 (7.1) -
> 500 33 (54.1) 2 (6.1) 122 22–221 25 (75.8) 110 45–237 2 (6.1) 1 1 1 (50.0) 3 (9.1) 4 (12.1)
All distances 61 4 (6.6) 75 19–175 48 (78.7) 110 37–204 5 (8.2) 4 1 3 (60.0) 7 (11.5) 4 (6.6)

All organs
< 100 326 (14.4) 25 (7.7) 183 37–396 123 (37.7) 165 38–397 39 (12.0) 35 4 13 (33.3) 38 (11.7) 139 (42.6)
100 to 300 704 (31.1) 51 (7.2) 142 77–298 230 (32.7) 150 38–291 101 (14.3) 59 42 31 (30.7) 82 (11.6) 322 (45.7)
301 to 500 511 (22.6) 33 (6.5) 294 118–445 140 (27.4) 178 42–401 81 (15.9) 46 35 12 (14.8) 45 (8.8) 257 (50.3)
> 500 724 (32.0) 35 (4.8) 326 83–555 238 (32.9) 154 49–308 118 (16.3) 72 46 26 (22.0) 61 (8.4) 333 (46.0)
All distances 2,265 144 (6.4) 227 81–407 731 (32.3) 157 42–333 339 (15.0) 212 127 82 (24.2) 226 (10.0) 1,051 (46.4)

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; UNOS, United Network for Organ Sharing, VATC, Veterans Affairs Transplant Center.

TRACER identified that 339 (15.0%) of the waitlist cohort were removed from the UNOS waitlist of which 212 (62.5%) were removed for failure to meet clinical criteria for transplantation, and 127 (37.5%) were removed for patient choice. Overall, 226 (10.0%) veterans died during the study period without receiving a transplant. Organ-specific mortality rates for veterans waitlisted but not transplanted at a VATC are as follows: heart 6.1%, kidney 5.9%, liver 19.0%, and lung 11.5%. As of March 31, 2017, 1,051 veterans were waitlisted with UNOS of which 876 (83.3%) were waitlisted for a kidney transplant.

The rate of mortality on the UNOS wait-list, the percentage of veterans transplanted, the time from waitlisting to transplantation, and the percentage of patients waitlisted at the end of the study period were not statistically different for referrals less than 100 miles compared with referrals at least 100 miles for all organs or kidney and liver separately (P ≤ .05). The relatively small numbers of veterans waitlisted for heart and lung transplants and nominal mortality events precluded making statements regarding significance for waitlist mortality.

The transplant cohort comprised 947 veterans receiving a solid organ transplant, including 102 (10.8%) heart, 411 (43.4%) kidney, 383 (40.4%) liver, and 51 (5.4%) lung transplants (Table 4). The median time from referral to evaluation was 34 days (IQR 21–85 d), referral to waitlisting was 107 days (IQR 48–218 d), and referral to transplant was 444 days (IQR 190–994d). This cohort includes the 731 transplants identified in the waitlist cohort plus 216 transplants performed on referrals waitlisted before October 1, 2013. These 216 transplants (17 heart, 172 kidney, 24 liver, and 3 lung) negatively influenced the timeliness of evaluations, waitlisting, and transplantation most notably with kidney transplantation. Time from referral to transplant was evaluated separately for all organs and each organ type separately, finding no statistical difference for referrals from VA medical facilities less than 100 miles from a VATC compared with referrals at least 100 miles in any category (P > .05).

TABLE 4.

Timeliness of Referral Evaluation, Waitlisting, and Transplantation for Transplants Performed in Fiscal Years 2014 to 2016

Distances, miles Transplants Performed, No. (%) Median Referral to Evaluation, d (IQR) Median Referral to Listing, d (IQR) Median Referral to Transplant, d (IQR)
Heart
< 100 18 (17.6) 2 (1–6) 4 (1–9) 327 (97–675)
100 to 300 31 (30.4) 19 (5–33) 63 (20–199) 352 (185–748)
301 to 500 18 (17.6) 20 (7–28) 60 (22–213) 405 (214–784)
> 500 35 (34.3) 20 (6–27) 50 (25–118) 263 (106–515)
All distances 102 16 (4–28) 50 (16–142) 301 (151–675)

Kidney
< 100 44 (10.7) 41 (19–70) 77 (45–165) 1,113 (613–1,646)
100 to 300 109 (26.5) 85 (36–144) 169 (107–304) 915 (475–1,536)
301 to 500 86 (20.9) 103 (46–206) 200 (101–390) 947 (479–1,511)
> 500 172 (41.8) 85 (45–158) 177 (107–315) 839 (420–1,414)
All distances 411 81 (36–150) 169 (96–308) 914 (460–1,506)

Liver
< 100 82 (21.4) 19 (5–35) 41 (15–86) 276 (72–550)
100 to 300 144 (37.6) 25 (12–34) 63 (31–126) 225 (99–394)
301 to 500 62 (16.2) 26 (15–33) 85 (36–142) 288 (120–547)
> 500 95 (24.8) 34 (23–54) 79 (51–165) 240 (89–522)
All distances 383 26 (14–39) 70 (32–131) 236 (91–500)

Lung
< 100 9 (17.6) 5 (2–24) 26 (7–155) 229 (90–351)
100 to 300 4 (7.8) 62 (47–93) 317 (85–604) 426 (155–743)
301 to 500 15 (29.4) 39 (29–54) 87 (68–213) 279 (170–585)
> 500 23 (45.1) 30 (26–42) 117 (85–155) 205 (139–444)
All distances 51 31 (23–49) 99 (68–203) 246 (139–466)

All organs
< 100 153 (16.2) 21 (5–41) 46 (15–105) 410 (99–851)
100 to 300 288 (30.4) 32 (20–81) 105 (43–204) 380 (185–956)
301 to 500 181 (19.1) 36 (24–114) 138 (69–259) 523 (239–1,109)
> 500 325 (34.3) 48 (27–104) 126 (71–237) 485 (205–1,045)
All distances 947 34 (21–85) 107 (48–218) 444 (190–994)

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

The transplant 30-day, 180-day, and 1-year survival rates are shown in Table 5. The 1-year survival rates for the VATP are as follows: heart 95.1%, kidney 97.4%, liver 91.7%, and lung 89.7%. These survival rates are on par or better than SRTR comparative estimates. Transplant survival rates were evaluated for each organ type separately, finding no statistical difference for referrals from VA medical facilities less than 100 miles compared with referrals at least 100 miles from a VATC in any category (P > .05).

TABLE 5.

Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimates by Distance Group for Transplants Performed in FY 2014 to FY 2016 Compared With SRTR Survival Estimates

Distances, miles Transplants Performed, No. (%) Mortalities, No. Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimate, %
30 Days 180 Day 1 Year 30 Days 180 Days 1 Year
Heart
< 100 18 (17.6) 0 0 1 100 100 94.4
100 to 300 31 (30.4) 1 2 2 96.8 93.5 93.5
301 to 500 18 (17.6) 0 0 0 100 100 -
> 500 35 (34.3) 0 2 2 100 94.3 94.3
All distances 102 1 4 5 99.0 96.1 95.1
SRTR National - - - 96.1 - 90.5

Kidney
< 100 44 (10.7) 0 0 0 100 100 -
100 to 300 109 (26.5) 0 2 3 100 98.2 97.0
301 to 500 86 (20.9) 0 1 3 100 98.8 96.4
> 500 172 (41.8) 1 2 4 99.4 98.8 97.6
All distances 411 1 5 10 99.8 98.8 97.4
SRTR National - - - 99.5 - 97.3

Liver
< 100 82 (21.4) 1 3 5 98.8 96.3 93.9
100 to 300 144 (37.6) 4 8 13 97.2 94.4 90.5
301 to 500 62 (16.2) 2 7 8 96.8 88.7 87.0
> 500 95 (24.8) 1 3 5 98.9 96.8 94.5
All distances 383 8 21 31 97.9 94.5 91.7
SRTR National - - - 97.3 - 91.6

Lung
< 100 9 (17.6) 0 0 0 100 100 100
100 to 300 4 (7.8) 0 0 0 100 100 100
301 to 500 15 (29.4) 0 2 3 100 86.7 78.0
> 500 23 (45.1) 0 2 2 100 91.3 91.3
All distances 51 0 4 5 100 92.2 89.7
SRTR National - - - 97.2 - 87.6

Abbreviations: FY, fiscal year; SRTR, Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients.

DISCUSSION

This study shows that the VATP delivers timely, high-quality care and services even when the veteran’s referring VA medical facility is located a considerable distance from the VATC. Three separate cohorts of veterans were examined for the FY 2014 to FY 2016 study period: those referred, those waitlisted, and those transplanted. The referral cohort identified 6,009 referral submissions, performed 3,500 evaluations on veterans deemed to be potential candidates for solid organ transplantation, and placed 2,137 of these referrals on the UNOS waitlist. The median time from referral to initial review decision was 5 hours for emergency referrals and 3 business days for stable referrals. The median time from referral to evaluation was 27 calendar days, and the median time from referral to UNOS waitlisting was 78 calendar days. Improvements in timeliness for referral initial review decision, evaluation completion, and waitlisting over the study period were reflective of VHA and NSO efforts to enhance access to services. In FY 2016, 100% of emergency referrals received an initial review decision within 48 hours, 91.4% of stable reviews received an initial review decision within 5 business days, and 86.9% of all referrals underwent evaluation within 30 calendar days.

Distance of less than 100 miles between the referring VA medical facility and the VATC was associated with statistically significant shorter times for initial review decision, evaluation, and UNOS waitlisting. Referrals from less than 100 miles were a minority (9.6%) of referrals and most often represented a direct referral from the VATC to its own program. Timeliness of referral initial review decision, evaluation, or UNOS wait-listing was similar for distance categories greater than 100 miles: 100 to 300 miles, 301 to 500 miles, or greater than 500 miles.

The waitlist cohort identified 2,265 veterans, of which 731 (32.3%) underwent transplantation and 226 (10.0%) died. All-cause mortality for veterans once waitlisted, whether or not maintained on the UNOS waitlist, varied among organs and was found to be 6.1% for heart, 5.9% for kidney, 19.0% for liver, and 11.5% for lung. Waitlist mortality and the time from referral to solid organ transplant was similar for all distance categories.

The transplant cohort identified 947 veterans receiving a solid organ transplant with a median time from referral to transplant that varied considerably by organ type; 301 days (10.0 mo) for heart transplants, 914 days (30.5 mo) for kidney transplants, 236 days (7.9 mo) for liver transplants, and 246 days (8.2 mo) for lung transplants. Time to transplant and post-transplant survival were similar in all distance categories. Moreover, the VATP 1-year survival rates compared favorably with published SRTR data.

Prior studies have shown that distance to a transplant center adversely impacts access to transplant services, mortality on the UNOS waitlist, and transplant outcomes.1721 Patients living in small towns and isolated rural regions were 8% to 15% less likely to be waitlisted and 10% to 20% less likely to undergo heart, kidney, and liver transplantation than were patients in urban environments.17 This study found that a referral to the VATP from a VA medical facility located less than 100 miles from the VATC received an evaluation 5 to 7 days sooner and be placed on the UNOS wait-list 21 to 29 days sooner than a veteran referred to a VATC located at least 100 miles away. Contrary to prior studies, the distance from the VATC did not have an adverse impact on UNOS waitlist mortality, time to transplantation, or survival outcomes posttransplant.

The VHA offers a number of advantages to the veteran in need of transplant care and services. The VHA is the largest integrated health care system in the US designed specifically for veterans and their complex and specific needs with greater than 1,200 points of care and a single electronic health record optimizing coordinated services.22 In addition, the VHA’s use of telehealth to expedite evaluations and follow-up transplant care closer to home thereby obviating the need for travel. The VHA also has an electronic process to facilitate referral and tracking of timeliness of care (TRACER). Finally, VHA has policies that supports travel benefits, including lodging for the veteran, caregiver, and living donor if applicable for evaluations, transplant procedures, and follow-up care.4,23

The coordination of health care services in a single integrated health care system may be the most significant advantage.24 Multiple studies have examined dual care, representing care and services provided across 2 separate health care systems, showing an association between dual care and an increased risk of hospitalization, duplication of tests, rates for prescribing potentially unsafe medications, and mortality.2527 Although no study to date is on point, it is reasonable to imply that dual care imposes unnecessary risks to the veteran receiving complex lifelong transplant care when the VATP is shown to provide timely and high-quality care.

Limitations

The retrospective design and limited study period represent limitations. Specifically, survival outcomes for veterans transplanted were limited to 1 year and do not rule out the possibility that distance to a VATC will impact survival rates at 3 and 5 years posttransplant.

CONCLUSION

A referral distance of less than 100 miles from the VATC most often represents a direct referral and is a factor in timeliness of transplant initial review decision, evaluation, and placement of the veteran on the UNOS waitlist. Distance between the referring VA medical facility and the VATC, including distances of greater than 500 miles, was not found to impact the rate of mortality on the UNOS waitlist, time to transplantation, or post-transplant survival. Overall, the VHA provides timely solid organ transplant care and services with outcomes comparable to that of nationally reported SRTR estimates. Future studies should examine the timeliness of services, outcomes, and costs associated with those veterans authorized by the VHA for non-VA community care and those veterans who independently elect to receive transplant care and services by a non-VA transplant center and return to the VHA for dual care following transplantation.

Footnotes

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.

References

  • 1.US Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. Profile of veterans: 2015 data from the American Community Survey. [Accessed July 2, 2018]. https://www.va.gov/VETDATA/DOCS/SPECIALREPORTS/PROFILE_OF_VETERANS_2015.PDF. Published March 2017.
  • 2.US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of the Inspector General. Review of alleged patient deaths, patient wait times, and scheduling practices at the Phoenix VA Health Care System. [Accessed July 2, 2018]. https://www.va.gov/OIG/PUBS/VAOIG-14-02603-267.PDF. Published August 26, 2014.
  • 3.US Department of Veterans Affairs. VHA directive 1700: Veterans Choice Program. [Accessed July 2, 2018]. https://www.va.gov/VHAPUBLICATIONS/VIEWPUBLICATION.ASP?PUB_ID=3287. Published October 25, 2016.
  • 4.US Department of Veterans Affairs. MyVA. [Accessed July 2, 2018]. https://www.va.gov/MYVA. Updated November 8, 2016.
  • 5.US Department of Veterans Affairs. Telehealth services. [Accessed July 2, 2018]. https://www.telehealth.va.gov. Updated March 27, 2017.
  • 6.US Department of Veterans Affairs. Secure messaging. My HealtheVet. [Accessed July 2, 2018]. https://www.myhealth.va.gov/MHV-PORTAL-WEB/SECURE-MESSAGING-SPOTLIGHT. Updated July 1, 2016.
  • 7.US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. VHA directive 2012-018: Solid organ and bone marrow transplantation. Published July 9, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Page WF, Mahan CM, Kang HK. Vital status ascertainment through the files of the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6(2):102–109. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(95)00126-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sohn M-W, Arnold N, Maynard C, Hynes DM. Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Popul Health Metr. 2006;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-4-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952;47(260):583–621. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94(446):496–509. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Peto R, Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 1972;135(2):185–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gehan EA. A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika. 1965;52(1/2):203–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee ET, Desu MM, Gehan EA. A Monte Carlo study of the power of some two-sample tests. Biometrika. 1975;62(2):425–432. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The R Foundation. The R project for statistical computing. [Accessed July 2, 2018]. https://www.r-project.org.
  • 16.Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. [Accessed July 2, 2018]. https://www.srtr.org.
  • 17.Axelrod DA, Guidinger MK, Finlayson S, et al. Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas. JAMA. 2008;299(2):202–207. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thabut G, Munson J, Haynes K, Harhay MO, Christie JD, Halpern SD. Geographic disparities in access to lung transplantation before and after implementation of the lung allocation score. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(11):3085–3093. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zorzi D, Rastellini C, Freeman DH, Elias G, Duchini A, Cicalese L. Increase in mortality rate of liver transplant candidates residing in specific geographic areas: analysis of UNOS data. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(8):2188–2197. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04083.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goldberg DS, French B, Forde KA, et al. Association of distance from a transplant center with access to waitlist placement, receipt of liver transplantation, and survival among US veterans. JAMA. 2014;311(12):1234–1243. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cicalese L, Shirafkan A, Jennings K, Zorzi D, Rastellini C. Increased risk of death for patients on the waitlist for liver transplant residing at greater distance from specialized liver transplant centers in the United States. Transplantation. 2016;100(10):2146–2152. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.US Department of Veterans Affairs. About VHA. [Accessed July 5, 2018]. https://www.va.gov/health/aboutvha.asp. Updated March 19, 2018.
  • 23.US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. Veterans Health Administration handbook 1601B.05: beneficiary travel. [Accessed July 5, 2018]. https://www.va.gov/vhapubli-cations/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=2275. Published July 21, 2010.
  • 24.Gellad WF. The Veterans Choice Act and dual health system use. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(2):153–154. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3492-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kothari AN, Loy VM, Brownlee SA, et al. Adverse effect of post-discharge care fragmentation on outcomes after readmissions after liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(1):62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thorpe JM, Thorpe CT, Gellad WF, et al. Dual health care system use and high-risk prescribing in patients with dementia. Ann Int Med. 2017;166(3):157–163. doi: 10.7326/M16-0551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tarlov E, Lee TA, Weichle TW, et al. Reduced overall and event-free survival among colon cancer patients using dual system care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(12):2231–2241. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Federal Practitioner are provided here courtesy of Frontline Medical Communications

RESOURCES