Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate systemic inflammatory biomarkers in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) and their association with radiographic and biochemical OA progression.
Methods:
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding protein (LBP), soluble Toll-like receptor 4 (sTLR4) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were measured in plasma of 431 knee OA patients from the doxycycline (DOXY) trial at baseline and 18 months. Plasma LBP was also measured at 12 months. As a biochemical indicator of disease activity and OA progression, urinary (u) C-telopeptide of Type II collagen (uCTX-II) was measured in samples collected at baseline and 18 months. Change over 16 months in radiographic tibiofemoral joint space width (JSW in mm) and joint space narrowing (JSN>0.5 mm) were used to indicate radiographic OA progression. Change over 18 months for uCTX-II was used as a secondary outcome. Both univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to test the association between Z-score transformed biomarkers and outcomes.
Results:
Baseline LBP and time-integrated concentration (TIC) of LBP over 12 and 18 months were associated with worsening JSW (parameter estimates: −0.1 to −0.07) and JSN (OR: 1.32 to 1.42) adjusting for treatment group, age, BMI and corresponding baseline radiographic measures. Baseline sTLR4 and TIC over 18 months were associated with change in uCTX-II over 18 months (adjusted parameter estimates: 0.0017 to 0.0020). Results were not modified by treatment with doxycycline.
Conclusion:
Plasma LBP and sTLR4 were associated with knee OA progression over 16–18 months. These results lend further support for a role of systemic low-grade inflammation in the pathogenesis of knee OA progression.
Keywords: LBP, sTLR4, biomarkers, inflammation, knee osteoarthritis, path analysis
Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent arthritic disease and a leading cause of disability, affecting more than 320 million individual globally, on the basis of age- standardized prevalence-rate estimates [1]. The past decade has marked a gradual but fundamental shift in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying OA away from the concept of it being the consequence of simple normal bodily wear and tear to an understanding of it being a complex multi-tissue pathology in which low-grade, chronic inflammation has a central role [2]. To date, studies of inflammation in OA pathogenesis and progression have focused on synovial inflammation (synovitis) [3]. However, emerging evidence suggests that synovitis is not the only form of inflammation observed in OA. Several hypotheses have been proposed in which inflammation and inflammation-related molecules from different underlying pathologies contribute to OA including: (i) previous joint trauma contributing to a local increased level of inflammatory mediators [4], (ii) metabolic syndrome and (iii) age, contributing to a systemic burden of low-grade pro-inflammatory stimuli [5–7]. These sources of local and systemic low-grade inflammation could contribute to the initiation and persistence of OA, and synergize with each other and other inflammatory mechanisms in OA [8, 9].
Biomarkers, such as toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) [10–12], lipopolysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) [13, 14], and interleukin 6 (IL-6) [15–17] have been associated with the burden of systemic low-grade inflammation and also implicated in inflammatory mechanisms underlying OA. Our objective was to evaluate the association of these systemic factors (LBP, soluble (s) TLR4 and IL-6), related to chronic low-grade inflammation, for associations with OA progression. Existing data and biospecimens from the completed randomized placebo-controlled doxycycline (DOXY) trial (NCT00000403) [18] provided the means of achieving this objective and evaluate, the potential modification of these inflammatory biomarkers in the context of a trial in which doxycycline modestly slowed knee OA progression [18, 19].
Previously, doxycycline was shown to be chondroprotective for human knee OA [18-20]. The chondroprotective effect demonstrated in these human trials was consistent with a number of prior trials showing chondroprotection by doxycycline in animal models of OA, including in guinea pigs [21], rabbits [22], dogs [21, 23] and horses [24]. Tetracyclines have been reported to inhibit matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) but the mechanism has not been completely elucidated; inhibition appears to be dependent on chelation of structural metals in MMPs rather than chelation of the active site Zn2+ [25]. The steady-state concentrations of doxycycline achieved with clinically relevant pharmacological doses of doxycycline (100 mg orally twice daily) in humans are 1.2–1.6 pg/ml; these are sufficient for an anti-microbial effect (required therapeutic range 0.5–1.0 pg/ml) [21], but generally below the range of concentrations required to inhibit the OA- associated matrix metalloproteinases: MMP-1 (collagenase) IC50 232 pg/ml; MMP-2 (gelatinase A) IC50 29 pg/ml; MMP-3 (stromelysin) IC50 16 pg/ml; and MMP-13 (collagenase) IC50 3–15 pg/ml [25, 26]. We therefore hypothesized that an MMP- independent mechanism may underlie the chondroprotective effects of doxycycline. Antibiotics are well known to alter the gut flora [27, 28]. An effect of doxycycline on gut microflora could lower endotoxemia leading to a decreased burden of systematic low- grade inflammation and thereby provide an alternative explanation for the chondroprotective effects of orally administered doxycycline.
Materials and Methods
Participants.
Data and samples corresponding to 431 participants from the doxycycline (DOXY) trial (NCT NCT00000403) [18] were available for this study (Table 1). Study participants, were obese women aged 45–64 years with unilateral radiographic knee OA according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology, with Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade 2 or 3 in one knee (the index knee) and K/L grade 0 or 1 in the contralateral knee [29] in a conventional standing anterior-posterior (AP) knee radiograph. All participants were in the upper tertile of the age- and race-adjusted norms for body mass index (BMI) in women [30]. Considering the positive structural modifying results of the DOXY trial at 16 months [18], we chose to focus our analyses on the first 16 months of data in this study (see Figure 1 study flow diagram). Available plasma samples from the DOXY clinical trial over this timeframe included 341 from baseline, 254 from the 12-month follow-up and 282 from 18-month follow-up. Urine samples from 237 of the DOXY clinical trial were also available from baseline and 236 from the 18-month follow-up. Samples were stored at −80°C until analysis.
Table 1.
Patient demographics and plasma/urine biomarker concentrations at baseline.
| DOXY Group (n=218) | Placebo Group (n=213) | Total (n=431) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics: | |||
| Age (years) | 54.60 (5.47) | 54.81 (5.81) | 54.70 (5.64) |
| Height (cm) | 162.84 (6.17) | 162.31 (6.05) | 162.59 (6.12) |
| Weight (kg) | 97.63 (18.08) | 96.06 (16.73) | 96.86 (17.42) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 36.77 (6.29) | 36.46 (5.97) | 36.62 (6.13) |
| Outcomes: | |||
| JSW (mm) | 3.84 (1.30) | 3.77 (1.27) | 3.81 (1.28) |
| uCTX-II (ng/mmol) | 0.0171 (0.0277) | 0.0135 (0.0194) | 0.0153 (0.0240) |
| Biomarkers: | |||
| sTLR4 (ng/mL) | 3.43 (12.10) | 5.74 (30.35) | 4.59 (23.17) |
| LBP (μg/mL) | 17.07 (7.09) | 17.59 (6.22) | 17.32 (6.68) |
| IL-6 (ng/mL) | 1.44 (1.22) | 1.56 (3.24) | 1.50 (2.45) |
Values are mean (SD); BMI=body mass index; JSW=joint space width; uCTX-II=urinary collagen type II neoepitope normalized to urine creatinine; sTLR4=soluble Toll-like receptor 4; LBP=lipopolysaccharide binding protein; IL-6=interleukin-6
Figure 1.

Study flow diagram.
As described previously, exclusion criteria for the main trial included posttraumatic or any other form of secondary knee OA, the presence of inflammatory arthritis, comorbidity that would confound measurements of the outcomes, and a history of tetracycline allergy. Participants were also ineligible for enrollment if they had received an intra-articular injection of hyaluronan within the previous 6 months or corticosteroid within the previous 3 months.
Imaging
For this study, we used the previously described radiographic joint space width (JSW) data derived by automated image analysis of fluoroscopically standardized semiflexed AP views of knees obtained at baseline and 16 months [18]. The change in minimum JSW of the medial tibiofemoral compartment was used as the indicator of structural change from baseline to 16 months. Change in JSW over 16 months (ΔJSW16 = JSW at 16 months - JSW at baseline) was analyzed as a continuous variable. We also analyzed, the change in JSN over 16 months (JSN16) as a dichotomized variable using reduction of 0.5 mm in JSW over 16 months as the threshold to distinguish knee OA JSN progressors (-ΔJSW16 > 0.5 mm) from non-progressors (-ΔJSW16 <0.5 mm) based on a variable determined for analyses in the original study and contemporaneously recommended by the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES) [31].
Biomarker quantification
Only EDTA plasma was archived and available from the DOXY study. Plasma biomarker analyses were performed blinded to the clinical data and outcomes in the Kraus laboratory. Soluble TLR4 (sTLR4) was measured at baseline and 18 months using the Human TLR-4 high-sensitivity sandwich-based ELISA (RayBiotech®, Norcross, GA, USA). Lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) was measured at baseline, 12 and 18 months using the Human LBP ELISA kit (Hycult®Biotech, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA). The manufacturer has verified that plasma and sera yield similar LBP concentrations with this ELISA kit (mean LBP based on 6 donors of 11.2 μg/mL (range 5.3–28.1 μg/mL) for EDTA plasma and 11.9 μg/mL (range 4.3–27.3 μg/mL) for sera. IL-6 was measured at baseline and 18 months using the V-PLEX Human IL-6 kit from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD, Rockville, MD, USA). CTX-II (IDS, Bolton, UK) in the urine was quantified at baseline and 18 months using an ELISA based on a sequence found exclusively in human type II collagen. Urinary CTX-II (uCTX-II) was corrected for creatinine excretion levels quantified by ELISA (Quidel, San Diego, USA). The coefficients of variation (CVs) for the assays conducted in the Kraus laboratory were as follows: Intra-assay CVs were sTLR4 5.24%, LBP 6.28%, IL-6 2.19%, uCTX-II 3.5%; Inter-assay CVs were sTLR4 6.46%, LBP 8.80%, IL-6 6.26%, uCTX-II 6.42%. For the purpose of statistical analyses, any value that was below the lowest limit of detection, (LLOD) for the biomarker assay was imputed as ½ LLOD of the assay. Although one of many, this imputation method is well-established and known for its simplicity and low bias [32]. Imputations for values below LLOD were performed as follows: sTLR4: 98 baseline and 77 at 18 months; LBP: only 2 at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months; CTX-II: only one sample at baseline; IL-6: no sample values imputed.
Statistical analysis
Outcomes of interest included continuous outcomes: ΔJSW16 and ΔuCTX-II18 (uCTX- II/creatinine at 18 months - baseline), and a binary outcome of radiographic progression (JSN). The outcome variable, uCTX-II, was log10 transformed to achieve a normal distribution for purposes of statistical analysis for the measures at single time points. For change in uCTX-II over 18 months (ΔuCTX-II18), to avoid negative values, we used the following transformation prior to log10 transformation: ΔuCTX-II18 + 1 − min(ΔuCTX-II18 for the cohort). We also considered change in total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score over 18 months although a threshold level of knee pain was not among the inclusion criteria for this study and not unexpectedly, baseline clinical manifestations of OA in these subjects was mild as reported in the original clinical trial report [18].
Descriptive statistics are presented as means±SD for continuous variables and frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. To be able to directly compare strengths of associations across the biomarkers, sTLR4, LBP and IL-6 were Z-score transformed. We considered the following four types of biomarker measurements: baseline, 12 months (only for LBP), 18 months, and the time-integrated concentration (TIC) of the biomarker from baseline to 18 months as previously described [33]. Pearson, correlations were calculated between Z-score transformed biomarkers (LBP, sTLR4 and IL-6), and the continuous outcomes ΔJSW16, ΔuCTX-II18). To assess the association between biomarkers and outcomes, univariate linear regression was used for continuous outcomes ΔJSW16, ΔuCTX-II18), and a logistic regression model was used for the binary outcome (JSN16). In addition to univariate analysis, multivariable regression analyses were performed to test the association between biomarkers and outcomes with covariate adjustment of treatment group and baseline outcome measure (e.g. baseline JSW or baseline uCTX-II/creatinine) in the initial model. Thereby, we analyzed change in the outcomes over time with adjustment for the baseline measure, and including age and BMI in the final model. Network plots were created to visualize the strength of correlations (Pearson using transformed variables for the analyses for the plot) among demographics, biomarkers, and outcomes of interests. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) with supplemental use of R software (version 3.3.2).
Results
Patient characteristics and outcomes
A total of 431 participants from the DOXY clinical trial were included in this study; 218 subjects were from DOXY treatment group and 213 from the Placebo group. All participants had unilateral knee OA at baseline, were females of similar age and in the upper tertile of the age-, race-, and sex-appropriate norms for body mass index (BMI) established by the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [34] (Table 1). The baseline biomarker (LBP, IL-6, and sTLR4) concentrations in the placebo and treated groups were comparable in magnitude and variability (Table 1).
Association of inflammatory biomarkers with OA structural changes
Adjusting for treatment group and baseline outcome variable, higher concentrations of LBP at baseline and TICs over 12 and 18 months (TIC(LBP)12, TIC(LBP)18) were associated with OA progression based on (decreasing) ΔJSW16 (parameter estimates (β coefficient): −0.096 to −0.142) and (increasing) JSN16 (OR: 1.36 to 1.50) (Table 2). Because the biomarker measures were Z-score transformed for all these analyses, these parameter estimates and OR represent the effect of one standard deviation increase of the biomarker predictor. With additional adjustment for age and BMI, the associations of LBP variables with OA progression were slightly attenuated but essentially unchanged (Table 3). The strongest of these associations was between TIC(LBP)12 and ΔJSW16 (parameter estimate −0.111), and between TIC(LBP)18 and JSN16 (OR 1.42) (Table 3). There were no statistically significant associations of sTLR4 or IL-6 with OA radiographic progression. The association of LBP with ΔJSW16 and JSN16 remained significant upon further adjustment for baseline sTLR4 (data not shown).
Table 2.
Association of inflammatory biomarkers with knee osteoarthritis structural progression (adjusted for treatment group and baseline outcome variable).
| Outcome Variable | Biomarker† | n | Parameter Estimate (SE) or Odds Ratio* (95% CI) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z-LBP baseline | 341 | −9.63×10−2 (4.06×10−2) | 0.018 | |
| Z-TIC (LBP)12 | 253 | −1.42×10−1 (4.90×10−2) | 0.004 | |
| Z-TIC (LBP)18 | 282 | −1.20×10−1 (4.59×10−2) | 0.009 | |
| ΔJSW16¶ | Z-sTLR4 baseline | 345 | 4.67×10−2 (5.03×10−2) | 0.354 |
| Z-TIC (sTLR4)18 | 288 | 6.08×10−2 (4.64×10−2) | 0.191 | |
| Z-IL-6 baseline | 343 | −4.66×10−2 (3.95×10−2) | 0.239 | |
| Z-TIC (IL-6)18 | 285 | −4.88×10−2 (4.63×10−2) | 0.292 | |
| Z-LBP baseline | 341 | 1.357 (1.068, 1.724) | 0.013 | |
| Z-TIC (LBP)12 | 253 | 1.452 (1.097, 1.921) | 0.009 | |
| Z-TIC (LBP)18 | 282 | 1.497 (1.133, 1.977) | 0.005 | |
| JSN16§ | Z-sTLR4 baseline | 345 | 0.751 (0.392, 1.439) | 0.388 |
| Z-TIC (sTLR4)18 | 288 | 0.502 (0.161, 1.564) | 0.235 | |
| Z-IL-6 baseline | 343 | 1.493 (0.878, 2.55) | 0.142 | |
| Z-TIC (IL-6)18 | 285 | 1.362 (0.884, 2.10) | 0.161 | |
| Z-LBP baseline | 235 | −2.87×10−4 (5.93×10−4) | 0.6290 | |
| Z-TIC (LBP)12 | 206 | −1.34×10−4 (6.49×10−4) | 0.836 | |
| Z-TIC (LBP)18 | 233 | −7.55×10−4 (5.81×10−4) | 0.897 | |
| Log10(ΔuCTX-Il18)¶ | Z-sTLR4 baseline | 234 | 1.96×10−3 (6.19×10−4) | 0.002 |
| Z-TIC (sTLR4)18 | 233 | 1.68×10−3 (5.42×10−4) | 0.002 | |
| Z-IL-6 baseline | 233 | 1.61×10−3 (1.26×10−3) | 0.203 | |
| Z-TIC (IL-6)18 | 230 | 2.09×10−3 (1.18×10−3) | 0.079 | |
Models were adjusted for treatment group and corresponding baseline radiographic measures (JSW baseline for ΔJSW16; uCTX-II at baseline for ΔuCTX-II18);
Models were adjusted for treatment group;
Data were Z score transformed;
Parameter estimates (beta coefficient estimates and standard error) from linear regression for continuous outcomes. Odds ratios only given for logistic regression models. ΔJSW16=JSW at 16 months– JSW at baseline; JSN16 dichotomized1 vs 0 based on joint space narrowing >0.5mm vs <0.05mm over 16 months; ΔCTX-II18=urinary CTX-II at 18 months – uCTX-II at baseline; TIC=time integrated over 12 or 18 months as indicated by subscript; remainder of abbreviations as in Table 1; p<0.05 in bold
Table 3.
Association of inflammatory biomarkers (LBP and sTLR4) with knee osteoarthritis progression (adjusted for treatment group, BMI and baseline outcome variable*).
| Outcome Variable | Biomarker† | n | Parameter Estimate (SE) or Odds Ratio*** (95% CI) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z-LBP baseline | 341 | −7.08×10−2 (4.18×10−2) | 0.090 | |
| ΔJSW16 | Z-TIC (LBP)12 | 253 | −1.11×10−1 (5.21×10−2) | 0.035 |
| Z-TIC (LBP)18 | 282 | −7.90×10−2 (4.79×10−2) | 0.100 | |
| Z-LBP baseline | 341 | 1.319 (1.029, 1.692) | 0.029 | |
| JSN16 | Z-TIC (LBP)12 | 253 | 1.406 (1.042, 1.898) | 0.026 |
| Z-TIC (LBP)18 | 282 | 1.418 (1.06, 1.897) | 0.019 | |
| Log10 (ΔuCTX-Il18)** | Z-sTLR4 baseline Z-TIC (sTLR4)18 |
234 233 |
1.98×10−3 (6.25×10−4) 1.71×10−3 (5.48×10−4) |
0.0017 0.0021 |
Biomarker Data were Z score transformed.
Covariates include treatment group, age, BMI, and corresponding baseline radiographic measures (JSW baseline for ΔJSW16; uCTX-II at baseline for ΔuCTX-II18)
log ((Δ uCTX-II18) was based on log10((Δ uCTX-II18+1-min((Δ uCTX-II18 for the cohort)).
Odds ratios only given for logistic regression models. Others are beta coefficient parameter estimates and standard error (SE) from linear regression for continuous outcomes. p<0.05 in bold
However, sTLR4 was significantly associated with worsening OA disease activity based on change (increase) over 18 months in the biochemical marker uCTX-II (ΔuCTX-II18). Adjusting for treatment group and baseline outcome variable, both sTLR4 at baseline and TIC over 18 months (TIC(sTLR4)18) were positively associated with ΔuCTX-N18 (Table 2). With additional adjustment for age and BMI, all sTLR4 associations with ΔuCTX-N18 were unchanged (Table 3).
Of the biomarkers, only IL-6 (both at baseline and TIC over 18 months) was statistically significantly associated with change in total WOMAC over 18 months. With adjustment (for treatment, age, BMI and baseline WOMAC), baseline IL-6 was marginally associated with change in WOMAC over 18 months (parameter estimate −1.26, standard, error (SE) 0.76, p=0.09) but IL-6 TIC-18 was not associated (parameter estimate −1.03, SE 0.87, p=0.24).
The network plot for measures across time points up to 18 months showed significant correlations among BMI, baseline LBP, TIC(LBP)12 and TIC(LBP)18 (Figure 2). Also, a significant correlation was observed between baseline uCTX-II and ΔuCTX-II18 (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Network plot including demographics, biomarkers and outcomes of interest. The network plot represents one-to-one Pearson correlations performed with z-score normalized biomarkers and log10 transformed uCTX-II to satisfy assumptions of normality. Positive correlation (>0.1)-red, negative correlation (<−0.1)-green. For the measurements derived from the same biomarkers (e.g. LBP baseline, TIC(LBP)12, TIC(LBP)12), we do not show their correlation since we are mainly interested in correlation among different biomarkers and other measures.
Discussion
In this substudy of the DOXY clinical trial, plasma LBP at baseline and TICs of LBP over 12 and 18 months were associated with radiographic structural worsening of knee OA over 16 months. The fact that adjusted analyses, accounting for treatment, did not alter the association of inflammatory mediators (LBP and sTLR4) with OA progression outcomes suggests that the chondroprotective effects of doxycycline in this study were likely not mediated by antibiotic induced changes in LBP. LBP is a well-known acute- phase reactant produced primarily by hepatocytes [35]. LBP is activated by inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1 and IL-6, and directly or indirectly by LPS itself [36–38]. Systemic concentrations of LBP have been reported to range from 5–10 pg/mL in a healthy population measured using a sandwich ELISA [39], whereas the range in our OA cohort was 2.5–94.92 pg/mL similarly using an ELISA based assay. In humans, LBP triggers a dynamic endotoxin (such as LPS) transfer cascade by binding and transferring LPS to CD14, which transfer LPS to TLR4-MD-2 receptors on immune cells; LBP thereby concentrates LPS at the cell membrane of immune cells to stimulate an inflammatory response [40]. LBP also recognizes pathogens such as spirochaeta, mycobacteria, gram-positive bacteria and mycoplasma [41]. LBP binds pro-inflammatory constituents of both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria [42], making it a more general marker of, bacterial exposures than LPS that stems only from Gram negative bacteria [38]. Measurement of LBP as an inflammatory mediator is generally preferred over direct measures of LPS due to the short half-life of LPS [43–45]. Moreover, although LPS measurements in blood are possible, the traditional Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay for LPS is not recommended for blood due to a host of inhibitors that interfere with the assay. Consequently, our study and most prior studies have utilized measures of LBP alone [46, 47]. Recently, Ge [48] and Nakarai et al. [49] suggested that LBP could also be considered an adipokine. Under conditions of positive energy balance, insulin resistance and inflammation, LBP is produced in excess through a TLR4 receptor- mediated mechanism by human adipocytes in response to inflammatory LPS or palmitate stimulation. Other studies indicate that LBP is a necessary factor for triggering an inflammatory cascade by saturated fatty acid and metabolic endotoxemia [50, 51]. In our previous study that evaluated the association of LPS with the severity of inflammation, symptoms and radiographic abnormalities in a relatively small knee OA cohort (n=25; 31 knees) [52], we observed higher serum LBP concentrations (16.4±5.3 pg/mL, range 8.2 to 26.1 pg/mL) than those reported for a healthy population [39]. This finding was further confirmed by the current study with a larger sample size. These results support a link of OA progression with low-grade inflammation that could be related, as we previously proposed [7], to an altered gut microbiome or metabolic stress.
Interestingly, another inflammatory mediator related to innate immunity, sTLR4, both at baseline and over 18 months, was associated with change in uCTX-II over 18 months, although we did not find a correlation between sTLR4 and radiographic progression based on ΔJSW16 or JSN. To our knowledge, the current study is the first to quantify plasma sTLR4 in knee OA patients. Endotoxin tolerance is induced by reducing cell surface TLR4 through CD14-dependent endocytosis or protease induced shedding of the ectodomain of TLR4 [53]. This phenomenon has been reported for many tissues, including articular cartilage [54]. Thus, based on other studies, the concentration of soluble TLR4 (sTLR4) in the current study was taken to reflect a global burden of low- grade inflammation. These findings are consistent with an important role of innate immunity and TLR4 inflammatory pathways in OA. These systemic biomarker measures (sTLR4 and uCTX-II) are both dynamic and likely reflect immediate OA disease activity rather than subsequent anatomic severity represented by radiographic measures of OA. Many studies have shown that multiple cell types within the joint (including macrophages, fibroblasts, and chondrocytes) increase expression of TLR4 throughout the process of joint space narrowing [55–59]. The release of sTLR4 has been related to the degree of systemic inflammation in body fluids/organs such as amniotic fluid, saliva, blood, cerebrospinal fluid, kidney and liver [60–64]. In the context of renal injury, TLR4 is shed from the cell surface to become soluble (sTLR4), which is believed to prevent further activation of TLR4 signaling [61]. Ten Oever et al. [65] proposed sTLR4 as a potential systemic biomarker for inflammatory conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis. Recently, Barreto et al. [54] detected elevated sTLR4 in synovial fluid from OA compared with healthy knees. Our results are consistent with sTLR4 as a biomarker of OA disease activity.
In the current study, we also measured plasma IL-6 in all available samples from the DOXY clinical trial. Although baseline IL-6, after covariate adjustment, was marginally associated with worsening OA symptoms over 18 months, it was not associated with radiographic OA progression over 16 months or change in uCTX-II over 18 months. The interval of radiographic OA progression assessed in this substudy (16 months) may have been too brief to reflect the resulting structural abnormalities resulting from the concurrent molecular level disease activity indicated by the IL-6 and CTX-II results.
The current study was novel for its evaluation of LBP as a mediator of DOXY treatment effects on OA structural progression. Although our results did not support, microbiome modification (based on LBP) as the means by which DOXY slowed knee OA progression, it supports the involvement of low-grade inflammation as a pathoetiological mechanism in OA progression.
The current study had several strengths. First, this study was based on a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a relatively large sample size. Second, we used features from carefully acquired radiographs and uCTX-II as indicators of OA progression. Third, all participants in the Doxycycline clinical trial were female. This would potentially enhance the homogeneity of the study population but potentially limit its generalizability to the population in general. One minor limitation related to the measurement of analytes in samples that had been stored frozen (albeit −80°C) for up to 18 years. Although, there is no available information on the stability of LBP in frozen samples over time, our results were in a similar range to those reported in studies in different populations using fresh samples [66, 67].
Conclusion
Our findings in the DOXY clinical trial indicate that LBP and sTLR4 demonstrate capabilities as prognostic biomarkers in knee OA patients. Our results support a role for low-grade inflammation, possibly related to metabolic stress and/or gut microbiome alteration in the pathogenesis of knee OA.
Acknowledgments
We wish to acknowledge funding to support this project by the Arthritis Foundation (373891) and NIA/NIH AG028716 (VBK). Dr. ZeYu Huang wishes to acknowledge funding support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 81702185).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
None of the authors have competing interests to disclose. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Symmons DMC, Pfleger B Global burden of osteoarthritis in the year 2000. WHO; [online], www.who.int/entity/healthinfo/statistics/bod_osteoarthritis.pdf 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Robinson WH, Lepus CM, Wang Q, et al. Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2016;12(10):580–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sellam J, Berenbaum F. The role of synovitis in pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010;6(11):625–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pessler F, Dai L, Diaz-Torne C, et al. The synovitis of “non-inflammatory” orthopaedic arthropathies: a quantitative histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67(8):1184–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Deng Y, Scherer pE. Adipokines as novel biomarkers and regulators of the metabolic syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1212:E1–E19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Issa RI, Griffin TM. Pathobiology of obesity and osteoarthritis: integrating biomechanics and inflammation. Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis 2012;2(2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huang Z, Kraus VB. Does lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation have a role in OA? Nat Rev Rheumatol 2016;12(2):123–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Berenbaum F, Griffin TM, Liu-Bryan R. Review: Metabolic Regulation of Inflammation in Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69(1):9–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krasnokutsky S, Oshinsky C, Attur M, et al. Serum Urate Levels Predict Joint Space Narrowing in Non-Gout Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69(6):1213–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gomez R, Villalvilla A, Largo R, Gualillo O, Herrero-Beaumont G. TLR4 signalling in osteoarthritis--finding targets for candidate DMOADs. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2015;11(3):159–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Barreto G, Soininen A, Ylinen P, et al. Soluble biglycan: a potential mediator of cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abella V, Scotece M, Conde J, et al. The novel adipokine progranulin counteracts IL-1 and TLR4-driven inflammatory response in human and murine chondrocytes via TNFR1. Sci Rep 2016;6:20356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zy Huang, Stabler T, Pei FX, Kraus VB Both systemic and local lipopolysaccharide (LPS) burden are associated with knee OA severity and inflammation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016;24(10):1769–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heumann D, Bas S, Gallay P, et al. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein as a marker of inflammation in synovial fluid of patients with arthritis: correlation with interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein. J Rheumatol 1995;22(7):1224–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Latourte A, Cherifi C, Maillet J, et al. Systemic inhibition of IL-6/Stat3 signalling protects against experimental osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;76(4):748–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Radojcic MR, Thudium CS, Henriksen K, et al. Biomarker of extracellular matrix remodelling C1M and proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 are related to synovitis and pain in endstage knee osteoarthritis patients. Pain 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Noss EH, Nguyen HN, Chang SK, Watts GF, Brenner MB. Genetic polymorphism directs IL-6 expression in fibroblasts but not selected other cell types. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112(48):14948–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA, Katz BP, et al. Effects of doxycycline on progression of osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52(7):2015–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA. Experience with a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of a disease-modifying drug for osteoarthritis: the doxycycline trial. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2006;32(1):217–34, xi-xii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Katz BP, et al. Subject retention and adherence in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51(6):933–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Greenwald R, Chowdhury M, Moak S, Wang H, Crossley E, Caterson B. Long-term doxycycline treatment inhibits histologic and immunologic features of spontaneous osteoarthritis in guinea pigs. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1994; 19:473. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pinney JR, Taylor C, Doan R, et al. Imaging longitudinal changes in articular cartilage and bone following doxycycline treatment in a rabbit anterior cruciate ligament transection model of osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30(2):271–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nganvongpanit K, Pothacharoen P, Suwankong N, Ong-Chai S, Kongtawelert P. The effect of doxycycline on canine hip osteoarthritis: design of a 6-months clinical trial. J Vet Sci 2009; 10(3):239–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Maher MC, Schnabel LV, Cross JA, Papich MG, Divers TJ, Fortier LA. Plasma and synovial fluid concentration of doxycycline following low-dose, low-frequency administration, and resultant inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-13 from interleukin- stimulated equine synoviocytes. Equine Vet J 2014;46(2):198–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Griffin MO, Fricovsky E, Ceballos G, Villarreal F. Tetracyclines: a pleitropic family of compounds with promising therapeutic properties. Review of the literature. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010;299(3):C539–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gilbertson-Beadling S, Powers EA, Stamp-Cole M, et al. The tetracycline analogs minocycline and doxycycline inhibit angiogenesis in vitro by a nonmetalloproteinase-dependent mechanism. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1995;36(5):418–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ianiro G, Tilg H, Gasbarrini A. Antibiotics as deep modulators of gut microbiota: between good and evil. Gut 2016;65(11):1906–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rajpal DK, Klein JL, Mayhew D, et al. Selective Spectrum Antibiotic Modulation of the Gut Microbiome in Obesity and Diabetes Rodent Models. PLoS One 2015;10(12):e0145499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16(4):494–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL. Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994. International journal of obesity 1998;22(1):39–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Abadie E, Ethgen D, Avouac B, et al. Recommendations for the use of new methods to assess the efficacy of disease-modifying drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004;12(4):263–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vexler A, Tao G, Chen X. A toolkit for clinical statisticians to fix problems based on biomarker measurements subject to instrumental limitations: from repeated measurement techniques to a hybrid pooled-unpooled design. Methods Mol Biol 2015;1208:439–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kraus VB, Collins JE, Hargrove D, et al. Predictive validity of biochemical biomarkers in knee osteoarthritis: data from the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76(1):186–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II. Vital and Health Statistics Anthropometric Reference Data and Prevalence of Overweight. DHHS Publ; #PHS 87 1688 Op-. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schumann RR, Kirschning CJ, Unbehaun A, et al. The lipopolysaccharide- binding protein is a secretory class 1 acute-phase protein whose gene is transcriptionally activated by APRF/STAT/3 and other cytokine-inducible nuclear proteins. Mol Cell Biol 1996;16(7):3490–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Brass DM, Savov JD, Whitehead GS, Maxwell AB, Schwartz DA. LPS binding protein is important in the airway response to inhaled endotoxin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;114(3):586–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gamble L, Bagby GJ, Quinton LJ, et al. The systemic and pulmonary LPS binding protein response to intratracheal lipopolysaccharide. Shock 2009;31(2):212–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schumann RR. Old and new findings on lipopolysaccharide-binding protein: a soluble pattern-recognition molecule. Biochem Soc Trans 2011;39(4):989–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tobias PS, Mathison J, Mintz D, et al. Participation of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in lipopolysaccharide-dependent macrophage activation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1992;7(3):239–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park BS, Lee JO. Recognition of lipopolysaccharide pattern by TLR4 complexes. Exp Mol Med 2013;45:e66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leante-Castellanos JL, de Guadiana-Romualdo LG, Fuentes-Gutierrez C, Hernando-Holgado A, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Jimenez-Santos E. The value of lipopolysaccharide binding protein for diagnosis of late-onset neonatal sepsis in very low birth weight infants. J Perinat Med 2015;43(2):253–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim SJ, Kim HM. Dynamic lipopolysaccharide transfer cascade to TLR4/MD2 complex via LBP and CD14. BMB Rep 2017;50(2):55–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Laugerette F, Furet JP, Debard C, et al. Oil composition of high-fat diet affects metabolic inflammation differently in connection with endotoxin receptors in mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2012;302(3):E374–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sun L, Yu Z, Ye X, et al. A marker of endotoxemia is associated with obesity and related metabolic disorders in apparently healthy Chinese. Diabetes Care 2010;33(9):1925–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Elsing C, Ernst S, Kayali N, Stremmel W, Harenberg S. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in acute gastrointestinal infections: value as biomarkers to reduce unnecessary antibiotic therapy. Infection 2011;39(4):327–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kheirandish-Gozal L, Peris E, Wang Y, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein plasma levels in children: effects of obstructive sleep apnea and obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99(2):656–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stehle JR Jr,Leng X, Kitzman DW, Nicklas BJ, Kritchevsky SB, High KP. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, a surrogate marker of microbial translocation, is associated with physical function in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012;67(11):1212–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ge Q, Gerard J, Noel L, Scroyen I, Brichard SM. MicroRNAs regulated by adiponectin as novel targets for controlling adipose tissue inflammation. Endocrinology 2012;153(11):5285–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nakarai H, Yamashita A, Nagayasu S, et al. Adipocyte-macrophage interaction may mediate LPS-induced low-grade inflammation: potential link with metabolic complications. Innate Immun 2012;18(1):164–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cani PD, Amar J, Iglesias MA, et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 2007;56(7):1761–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chung S, Lapoint K, Martinez K, Kennedy A, Boysen Sandberg M, McIntosh MK. Preadipocytes mediate lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation and insulin resistance in primary cultures of newly differentiated human adipocytes. Endocrinology 2006;147(11):5340–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang ZY, Stabler T, Pei FX, Kraus VB. Both systemic and local lipopolysaccharide (LPS) burden are associated with knee OA severity and inflammation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016;24(10):1769–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yang WS, Kim JJ, Lee MJ, Lee EK, Park SK. ADAM17-Mediated Ectodomain Shedding of Toll-Like Receptor 4 as a Negative Feedback Regulation in Lipopolysaccharide-Activated Aortic Endothelial Cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018;45(5):1851–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Barreto G, Sandelin J, Salem A, Nordstrom DC, Waris E. Toll-like receptors and their soluble forms differ in the knee and thumb basal osteoarthritic joints. Acta Orthop 2017;88(3):326–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lieberthal J, Sambamurthy N, Scanzello CR. Inflammation in joint injury and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015;23(11):1825–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schelbergen RF, Blom AB, van den Bosch MH, et al. Alarmins S100A8 and S100A9 elicit a catabolic effect in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes that is dependent on Toll-like receptor 4. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64(5):1477–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sillat T, Barreto G, Clarijs P, et al. Toll-like receptors in human chondrocytes and osteoarthritic cartilage. Acta Orthop 2013;84(6):585–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Karlsson C, Dehne T, Lindahl A, et al. Genome-wide expression profiling reveals new candidate genes associated with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18(4):581–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ayral X, Pickering EH, Woodworth TG, Mackillop N, Dougados M. Synovitis: a potential predictive factor of structural progression of medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis -- results of a 1 year longitudinal arthroscopic study in 422 patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005;13(5):361–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mitsuzawa H, Nishitani C, Hyakushima N, et al. Recombinant soluble forms of extracellular TLR4 domain and MD-2 inhibit lipopolysaccharide binding on cell surface and dampen lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation in mice. J Immunol 2006;177(11):8133–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zager RA, Johnson AC, Lund S, Randolph-Habecker J. Toll-like receptor (TLR4) shedding and depletion: acute proximal tubular cell responses to hypoxic and toxic injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2007;292(1):F304–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kacerovsky M, Andrys C, Hornychova H, et al. Amniotic fluid soluble Toll-like receptor 4 in pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(7):1148–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Uchimura K, Hayata M, Mizumoto T, et al. The serine protease prostasin regulates hepatic insulin sensitivity by modulating TLR4 signalling. Nat Commun 2014;5:3428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sokol B, Wasik N, Jankowski R, Holysz M, Wieckowska B, Jagodzinski P.Soluble Toll-Like Receptors 2 and 4 in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Acute Hydrocephalus following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage. PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0156171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ten Oever J, Kox M, van de Veerdonk FL, et al. The discriminative capacity of soluble Toll-like receptor (sTLR)2 and sTLR4 in inflammatory diseases. BMC Immunol 2014;15:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sakura T, Morioka T, Shioi A, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is associated with arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2017;16(1):62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tilves CM, Zmuda JM, Kuipers AL, et al. Association of Lipopolysaccharide- Binding Protein With Aging-Related Adiposity Change and Prediabetes Among African Ancestry Men. Diabetes Care 2016;39(3):385–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
