Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2011 Aug 19;16(8):7115–7124. doi: 10.3390/molecules16087115

Essential Oil Composition of the Different Parts and In Vitro Shoot Culture of Eryngium planum L

Barbara Thiem 1,*, Małgorzata Kikowska 1, Anna Kurowska 2, Danuta Kalemba 2
PMCID: PMC6264572  PMID: 25134776

Abstract

The essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation from the different parts (inflorescence, stalk leaves, rosette leaves and root) as well as from in vitro shoot culture of Eryngium planum L. were analyzed by GC-FID-MS in respect to their chemical composition. The different parts of E. planum and in vitro shoots showed different yields. The part with higher amount was the inflorescences, followed by the stalk leaves and in vitro shoots, rosette leaves and finally roots. The essential oils obtained from rosette leaves and in vitro-derived rosettes had totally different composition. Quantitative differences were also found between compounds of intact plant organs. The main components of stalk leaf oil and rosette leaf oil were monoterpene (limonene, α- and β-pinene) and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons. In inflorescence oil cis-chrysanthenyl acetate (43.2%) was accompanied by other esters (propionate, butanoate, hexanoate and octanoate) and numerous oxygenated sesquiterpenes. Root oil and in vitro shoot oil contained mainly (Z)-falcarinol and 2,3,4-trimethylbenzaldehyde. This is the first report on the chemical composition of this species.

Keywords: Eryngium planum, essential oil composition, falcarinol, in vitro shoot culture

1. Introduction

The genus Eryngium L. (Sea Holly) belonging to the subfamily Saniculoideae of the Apiaceae is represented by 317 taxa widespread throughout Central Asia, America, Central and Southeast Europe [1]. Some species, such as E. foetidum L., E. maritimum L., E. campestre L. and E. creticum Lam. have been used in traditional medicine worldwide [2]; E. foetidum L. (culantro), known as “spiny coriander” is strongly aromatic and contains essential oil valuable for pharmaceutical, perfumery and flavor industries [3]. The pharmacological activities of Eryngium species depend mainly on high triterpenoid saponin content [4], but presence of flavonoids [5], namely kaempferol and quercetin glycosides [6], and phenolic acids [7] could play an important role. Coumarin derivatives [8], acetylenes [9,10], as well as rosmarinic acid and chlorogenic acid, known as antioxidants [11], have been described for many Eryngium species. Rosmarinic acid accumulation in in vitro E. planum cultures was previously investigated by the authors [12].

Four of the 26 Eryngium species described in Flora Europaea [13] grow in Poland as rare or protected plants. E. planum L. (Flat Sea Holly) is a rare herbaceous perennial species of native flora with restricted distribution in Poland [14]. This erect herb has silvery-blue stems of 40–60 cm in height, basal leaves and bluish inflorescences. E. planum is used in folk medicine in Europe as Eryngii plani herba and Eryngii plani radix. The presence of the active constituents: phenolic acids, triterpenoid saponins, flavonoids, essential oils and coumarins determines their multidirectional pharmacological activity: diuretic, expectorant, spasmolytic, antitussive, antimycotic, stimulant and appetizer [4,7,15]. The chemistry of E. planum has been previously studied, but to our knowledge, no study has dealt with the chemical composition of the essential oil from this species.

Numerous studies have been carried out using plant in vitro cultures as a potential source of valuable constituents. Some difficulties correlated with low or varied concentration of desired compounds in intact plants can be overcome by using plant cell biotechnology. The use of cell and organ cultures, selection of high producing culture and medium optimizations gives the possibility of optimizing the processes of increased secondary metabolites accumulation under controlled conditions. In vitro technology offers following benefits: novel products not found in nature, use of rare, endangered or protected plants, independence from climatic factors, elimination of the geographical and political boundaries, shorter and more flexible production cycles and easier fulfillment of GLP and GMP demands [16]. It was shown that numerous bioactive compounds of medicinal value including essential oil components may be accumulated in in vitro cultures in higher concentration than in intact plants [17,18].

2. Results and Discussion

Some species of Apiaceae have been studied for its high essential oils yield, however Pala-Paul et al. [14] reported that the genus Eryngium did not contain large amounts of essential oil. The hydrodistillation of the dried aerial parts (inflorescences, leaves and rosette leaves), roots and in vitro-derived shoot culture of E. planum gave essential oils in yields ranging from 0.05% (roots), 0.07% (rosette leaves), 0.10% (stalk leaves and in vitro shoots) to 0.23% (inflorescences). This fact can be explained by the process of essential oil distribution from roots through the plant during the vegetative season [19]. The chemical composition of the oils were analyzed by GC-FID-MS. More than one hundred constituents were identified according to their retention indices (RI) and mass spectra. The identified compounds are presented in Table 1. Similarities were observed in the qualitative composition and some significant differences in the quantitative composition of the oils obtained from stalk leaves and rosette leaves. The main constituents of both oils were monoterpene hydrocarbons (42.0% and 28.4%, respectively) with limonene, α- and β-pinene, β-phellandrene and camphene predominating. The second important group was numerous sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (20.0% and 24.4%, respectively). The main difference was high content of terpinen-4-ol (10.9%) and bornyl acetate (18.1%) in rosette leaf oil.

Table 1.

Chemical composition (%) of essential oil from different organs of intact plants and in vitro shoot culture of Eryngium planum L.

No. Compound RIexp RIlit Organ of intact plants In vitro shoot
L RL I R
1. Hexanal 776 0.2
2. Heptanal 876 0.5 0.1
3. Santene 882 884 0.2
4. Tricyclene 922 927 0.1 0.5 0.1
5. α-Pinene 932 936 5.4 4.6 11.3 0.1 5.0
6. Camphene 946 950 0.9 5.4 0.1 0.1 t
7. 1-Octen-3-ol 960 962 0.1
8. Sabinene 970 973 0.1 0.4
9. β-Pinene 973 978 9.8 2.1 0.3 0.1 0.3
10. Octanal 978 981 2.6 0.9 0.8
11. Myrcene 984 987 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2
12. α-Phellandrene 999 1002 0.2 0.1 t
13. 3-Carene 1007 1010 3.4 0.5 t
14. α-Terpinene 1011 1013 0.4 0.2 t
15. p-Cymene 1015 1015 1.4 1.4 0.3 0.1
16. β-Phellandrene 1023 1023 4.9 1.5
17. Limonene 1024 1025 14.7 11.3 0.9 3.2
18. γ-Terpinene 1052 1051 0.3 0.3 t
19. Nonanal 1077 1081 0.1
20. p-Cymenene 1080 1075 0.1 t
21. Terpinolene 1083 1082 0.2 0.2
22. Linalool 1086 1086 t 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.1
23. Hotrienol 1087 1087 1.4
24. Isophorone 1093 1095 0.6
25. α-Fenchol 1102 1099 0.2 0.1 0.1
26. Camphor 1126 1123 t 0.2
27. trans-Pinocarveol 1128 1126 0.1 0.2
28. cis-Verbenol 1134 1132 0.1
29. trans-Verbenol 1138 1136 0.4
30. Menthone 1144 1142 0.1
31. cis-Chrysanthenol 1150 1147 0.7
32. Borneol 1155 1150 0.3 1.1
33. Cryptone 1163 1160 0.2 0.1
34. Terpinen-4-ol 1166 1164 0.6 10.9 0.2 0.1 0.1
35. p-Cymen-8-ol 1170 1169 0.1
36. α-Terpineol 1177 1176 1.4 2.0 0.1
37. Safranal 1182 1182 0.1
38. Fenchyl acetate 1210 1205 0.1 1.7 0.3
39. Thymol metyl ether 1218 1215 1.2
40. cis-Chrysanthenyl acetate 1248 1253 43.2
41. Bornyl acetate 1274 1270 4.6 18.1
42. 2,3,6-Trimethylbenzaldehyde 1296 1293 1.6 1.0 1.6
43. α-Terpinyl acetate 1330 1335 0.1 0.1
44. 2,3,4-Trimethylbenzaldehyde 1337 1331 t 17.4 6.2
45. Bicycloelemene 1337 1338 0.1 0.5 0.7
46. δ-Elemene 1341 1340 0.1 0.6 t
47. cis-Chrysanthenyl propionate 1342 1342 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.6
48. α-Cubebene 1354 1355 0.1 0.1 t
49. Geranyl acetate 1363 1362 0.1
50. α-Ylangene 1378 1376 0.1 0.1 0.1
51. α-Copaene 1382 1379 1.6 1.0 0.5 0.1 t
52. Isoledene 1385 1382 0.3 t 0.1
53. β-Bourbonene 1391 1386 1.0 t 0.2 0.2
54. β-Elemene 1393 1389 2.1 1.1 1.7 t
55. β-Isocomene 1393 1389 0.2
56. α-Gurjunene 1418 1413 0.3
57. β-Ylangene 1424 1420 0.3 0.7 0.1
58. β-Caryophyllene 1427 1424 1.2 1.1 3.2
59. cis-Chrysanthenyl butanoate 1431 3.2
60. γ-Elemene 1432 1429 0.7 1.6 0.8
61. β-Copaene 1433 1430 0.7 0.4 0.2
62. trans-α-Bergamotene 1435 1434 0.4 0.1
63. (E)-β-Farnesene 1444 1446 t 2.0 1.4 23.4
64. Selina-4(15),6-diene 1446 1450 0.3 t
65. α-Humulene 1460 1455 1.1 0.4 0.8
66. Aromadendra-1(10),4-diene 1467 1462 0.6 1.1
67. (E)-β-Ionone 1471 1468 0.1 t
68. γ-Muurolene 1478 1474 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.7
69. Germacrene D 1485 1486 1.4 8.3 2.3 0.8
70. β-Selinene 1492 1486 0.9 0.5 0.4
71. γ-Amorphene 1496 1492 0.3 0.3 t
72. epi-Zonarene 1498 1494 0.5
73. α-Selinene 1498 1494 0.4
74. Bicyclogermacrene 1498 1494 1.6 1.5 0.4 0.4
75. α-Muurolene 1500 1496 1.4 0.1
76. β-Bisabolene 1506 1503 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.3
77. γ-Cadinene 1511 1507 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2
78. β-Sequiphellandrene 1513 1516 0.9
79. trans-Calamenene 1519 1519 0.6 0.3 t t t
80. δ-Cadinene 1522 1520 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.5
81. Zonarene 1526 1526 0.5 0.1
82. ω-Cadinene 1534 1526 0.1 0.1
83. α-Calacorene 1539 1539 0.7 0.2 0.3
84. Salviadienol 1550 1549 0.9 0.1 0.5
85. Germacrene B 1552 1552 1.1
86. Mintoxide 1568 1568 0.8 0.1 t
87. Spathulenol 1576 1576 2.2 0.6 0.4 0.1
88. Salvial-4(14)-en-1-one 1591 1591 0.9 0.2 0.3
89. Carotol 1592 1594 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1
90. β-Oplopenone 1599 1598 0.8 0.1
91. Torilenol 1606 1607 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.5
92. 1,10-di-epi-Cubenol 1623 1623 0.3 0.2 0.1
93. cis-Chrysanthenyl hexanoate 1630 1628 0.2 0.1 3.9
94. β-Acorenol 1633 1633 0.1 0.1 0.2
95. T-Muurolol 1637 1637 0.9 0.3 0.2
96. β-Eudesmol 1640 1641 0.2
97. α-Cadinol 1645 1643 0.5 0.1 0.2
98. α-Eudesmol 1655 1653 0.2
99. Cadalene 1667 1667 0.9 0.1 0.4
100. Eudesma-4(15)-dien-1β-ol 1681 1681 1.3 0.2 0.7
101. (E)-γ-Atlantone 1689 1691 0.7 0.2
102. Mintsulphide 1743 1743 0.3 0.6
103. 6,10,14-Trimethylpentadecan-2-one 1832 1832 2.1 0.1 t
104. cis-Chrysanthenyl octanoate 1832 1.4 1.9
105. Neophytadiene (isomere 2) 1837 1837 0.6 0.5 0.1
106. Palmitic acid 1955 0.9
107. (Z)-Falcarinol 2011 2005 0.2 0.4 64.4 49.1
108. Linoleic acid 0.4
   
Total identified 86.0 93.2 94.9 93.2 94.3
Aliphatic compounds 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.9 1.3
Monoterpene hydrocarbons 42.0 28.4 12.9 4.0 5.9
Oxygenated monoterpenes   10.3 36.6 51.2 1.6 1.9
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons   20.0 24.4 18 3.1 26.1
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes   10.6 2.4 7.7 0.8 0.8
Falcarinol 0.0 0.2 0.4 64.4 49.1
Other compounds   3.1 1.2 1.6 18.4 9.7
Oil yield 0.10 0.07 0.23 0.05 0.10

RIexp – Experimental Retention Index, RIlit – Literature Retention Index, L – Stalk Leaves, RL – Rosette Leaves, I – Inflorescence, R – Root, t – trace (percentage value less than 0.05%).

The oil obtained from inflorescences of E. planum contained mainly cis-chrysanthenyl esters: acetate (43.2%), propionate (0.2%), butanoate (3.2%), hexanoate (3.9%), and octanoate (1.9%). The latter two have recently been isolated from this oil and identified by NMR [20]. Numerous oxygenated monoterpenes (51.2%), sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (18%) and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (7.7%) were identified in this oil and the unidentified part of the oil was constituted by compounds of this latter group.

(Z)-Falcarinol (64.4%) was found as the major component of root essential oil, followed by 2,3,4-trimethylbenzaldehyde (17.4%) with 2,3,6-trimethylbenzaldehyde (1%). (Z)-Falcarinol had been previously identified as one of the main compounds in Eryngium yuccifolium Michaux. leaves and stalks [21]. This polyacetylene also dominated in the oil obtained from in vitro shoot cultures (49.1%). (E)-β-Farnesene (23.4%) and 2,3,4-trimethylbenzaldehyde (6.2%) with 2,3,6-trimethylbenzaldehyde (1.6%) were other important constituents of this oil. The various trimethylbenzaldehyde isomers (2,3,4-trimethylbenzaldehyde, 2,4,5-trimethylbenzaldehyde, 2,3,6-trimethylbenzaldehyde, 2,4,6-trimethylbenzaldehyde) were reported in higher concentration in essential oil in different parts of E. yuccifolium Michx. [21], E. foetidum L. [3,22,23], E. corniculatum Lam. [24], E. expansum F. Muell. [25], E. amethystinum L. [26], and E. maritimum L. [19].

Samples of rosette leaves of intact plants and in vitro-derived rosettes (shoot culture) were gathered at the same regeneration phase from different type of soil (ground and in vitro culture medium). It was surprising that essential oils obtained from these two populations had totally different composition. Quantitative similarities in oil components were found in two different organs – roots of intact plants and in vitro regenerated shoot culture. The major constituents of essential oil in shoot in vitro cultures and root were (Z)-falcarinol (49.1% and 64.4 % respectively) and 2,3,4-trimethylbenzaldehyde (6.2% and 17.4% respectively). These observations could be explain by vegetation phase of plant, location and type of soil [27,28].

Polyacetylenes such as falcarinol and falcarindiol are wide spread among the Apiaceae plant family [10]. They are common in carrots and related vegetables such as parsley, celery, parsnip and fennel as well as in medicinal plants such as ginseng [29]. They show a wide variety of different pharmacological effects including anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet-aggregatory, cytotoxic and antitumor activity [29,30]. Moreover these aliphatic C17-polyacetylenes of the falcarinol-type exhibit anti-bacterial, antifungal and antimycobacterial activities [31]. Falcarinol (heptadeca-1,9-dien-4,6-diyn-3-ol) appears to be the most bioactive compound in the falcarinol-type polyacetylenes group. It has shown a pronounced cytotoxic activity against human tumor cells in vitro and it also seems to possess in vivo anti-tumor activity [10]. These polyacetylenes have also been shown to be responsible for allergic skin reactions [10]. The beneficial effects of falcarinol-type polyacetylenes occur at nontoxic concentrations and thus represent pharmacologically useful properties indicating that polyacetylenes may be important nutraceuticals. Overall the results suggest that oil from different parts of in vivo as well as in vitro shoots could be a source of falcarinol and polyacetylenes which are important health promoting compounds.

3. Experimental

3.1. Intact Plant

Plants of E. planum were collected at the full flowering stage in natural site near Torun, in the Kujawy region of Central Poland. The fruits were gathered from the same place. The voucher specimens from the Department of Pharmaceutical Botany and Plant Biotechnology, K. Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences in Poznan were deposited in the Herbarium of Institute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plant in Poznan. Plants were divided into parts (inflorescence, stalk leaves, rosette leaves and roots) and were air-dried.

3.2. In Vitro Shoot Culture

Seedlings of E. planum were obtained from the seeds, which were isolated from the ripened fruits after their stratification and scarification. For initiation of in vitro cultures, the seeds isolated from fruits were washed with distilled water and dipped in 70% ethanol for 30 s followed by rising in 20% Clorox (5% sodium hypochloride) solution containing two drops of Tween 80 for 5 min. They were finally rinsed three times in sterilized double-distilled water. Shoot tips of axenic seedlings (30-day old) were used for induction of shoot culture and establishment on MS [32] basal medium supplemented with 3% sucrose and plant growth regulators: BAP 1.0 mg·L−1, and IAA 0.1 mg·L−1. Media were solidified with 0.8% agar and adjusted to pH 5.7-5.8, autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min (105 kPa). Shoot cultures were maintained in 250 cm3 Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 cm3 of culture medium, subcultured to fresh medium every 6–8 weeks and incubated in growth chamber under a 16/8 h photoperiod at 55 μmol m−2 s−1 light provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps and a temperature of 23 ± 2 °C. The ‘shoot culture’, a type of in vitro cultures, in case of E. planum is a rosette of leaves (like a juvenile stadium of intact plant). For isolation of essential oil the multiplied in vitro shoots were washed from medium and air dried.

3.3. Isolation and Analysis of Essential Oil

The essential oils were obtained by hydrodistillation for three hours of dried plant material using a glass Clevenger-type apparatus, according to European Pharmacopoeia 5.0. GC-FID-MS analyses were performed using a Trace GC Ultra apparatus (Thermo Electron Corporation) equipped with FID and MS DSQ II detectors and FID-MS splitter (SGE). Operating conditions: apolar capillary column Rtx-1ms (Restek), 60 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 µm; temperature program, 50–300 °C at 4 °C/min; SSL injector temperature 280 °C; FID temperature 300 °C; split ratio 1:20; carrier gas helium at a regular pressure 200 kPa. Mass spectra were acquired over the mass range 30–400 Da, ionization voltage 70 eV; ion source temperature 200 °C.

Identification of components was based on the comparison of their MS spectra with those of a laboratory-made MS library, commercial libraries (NIST 98.1, Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data, 8th Ed. and MassFinder 4.1, laboratory-made list) and with literature data [33,34] along with the retention indices (Rtx-1, MassFinder 4.1) associated with a series of alkanes with linear interpolation (C8-C26). A quantitative analysis (expressed as percentages of each component) was carried out by peak area normalization measurements without correction factors.

4. Conclusions

The results suggest that oil from different parts of in vivo E. planum plants as well as in vitro shoots could be a source of falcarinol, polyacetylene which is an important health promoting compound. Our studies have shown that the yield of the oil isolated from different parts of E. planum and in vitro shoots is low and the essential oils contain complex mixtures of up to 111 different compounds.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Warsaw, Poland from educational sources of 2008–2011 as grant nr NN 405 065334.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  • 1.Wörz A. On the distribution and relationships of the South-West Asian species of Eryngium L. (Apiaceae-Saniculoideae) Turk. J. Bot. 2004;28:85–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kϋpeli E., Kartal M., Aslan S., Yesilada E. Comparative evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of Turkish Eryngium species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006;107:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pino J.A., Rosado A., Fuentes V. Composition of the leaf oil of Eryngium foetidum L. from Cuba. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997;9:467–468. doi: 10.1080/10412905.1997.9700751. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hiller K., Keipert M., Pfeifer S. Isolierung von Estern des Barringtogenols C aus Eryngium planum L. Pharmazie. 1972;27:342–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hiller K., Pohl B., Franke P. Flavonoid spectrum of Eryngium maritimum L. Part 35. Components of some Saniculoideae. Pharmazie. 1981;36:451–452. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hohmann J., Pall Z., Gunther G., Mathe I. Flavonolacyl glycosides of the aerial parts of Eryngium campestre. Planta Med. 1997;63:96. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Duke J.A., Bogenschutz-Godwin M.J., du Cellier J., Duke P.A. Handbook of Medicinal Herbs. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2002. pp. 277–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Erdelmeier C.A.J., Sticher O. Coumarin derivatives from Eryngium campestre. Planta Med. 1985;51:407–409. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-969533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lam J., Christensen L.P., Thomasen T. Acetylenes from roots of Eryngium bourgatti. Phytochemistry. 1992;31:2881–2882. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(92)83652-F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Christensen L.P., Brandt K. Bioactive polyacetylenes in food plants of the Apiaceae family: occurrence, bioactivity and analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006;41:683–693. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.01.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Le Claire E., Schwaiger S., Banaigs B., Stuppner H., Gafner F. Distribution of a new rosmarinic acid derivative in Eryngium alpinum L. and Other Apiaceae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53:4367–4372. doi: 10.1021/jf050024v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kikowska M., Thiem B., Krawczyk A. Rosmarinic acid accumulation in the cell suspension culture of Eryngium planum L. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2009;56:71–73. doi: 10.18388/abp.2014_880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A. Flora Europea: Rosaceae to Umbelliferae. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Żukowski W., Jackowiak B. Ginące i zagrożone rośliny naczyniowe Pomorza Zachodniego i Wielkopolski. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe Poznań; Górna Wilda, Poland: 1995. pp. 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hiller K., Friedrich M. Zür antimykotischen Wirkung von Astrantia-, Eryngium- und Sanicula-Saponinen. Pharmazie. 1974;29:787–788. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Matkowski A. Plant in vitro culture for the production of antioxidants – a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008;26:548–560. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lila M.A. Valuable Secondary Products from. In Vitro Culture. In: Trigiano R.N., Gray D., editors. Plant Development and Biotechnology. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2005. pp. 285–289. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gounaris Y. Biotechnology for the production of essential oils, flavours and volatile isolates. A review. Flavour. Fragr. J. 2010;25:367–386. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1996. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pala-Paul J., Perez-Alonso M.J., Velasco-Negueruela A., Varade J., Villa A.M., Sanz J., Brophy J.J. Analysis of the essential oil composition from the different parts of Eryngium glaciale Boiss. from Spain. J. Chromatogr. A. 2005;1094:179–182. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Korbel E., Bighelli A., Kurowska A., Kalemba D., Casanova J. New cis-chrysanthenyl esters from Eryngium planum L. Nat. Prod. Comm. 2008;3:113–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ayoub A., Al-Azizi M., König W., Kubeczka K.H. Essential oils and a novel polyacetylene from Eryngium yuccifolium Michaux. (Apiaceae) Flavour Fragr. J. 2006;21:864–868. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wong K.C., Feng M.C., Sam T.W., Tan G.L. Composition of the leaf and root oils of Eryngium foetidum L. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1994;6:369–374. doi: 10.1080/10412905.1994.9698401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paul J.H.A., Seaforth C.E., Tikasingh T. Eryngium foetidum L.: A review. Fitoterapia. 2011;82:302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pala-Paul J., Brophy J.J., Perez-Alonso M.J., Usano J., Soria S.C. Essential oil composition of the different parts of Eryngium corniculatum Lam. (Apiaceae) from Spain. J. Chromatogr. A. 2007;1175:289–293. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.10.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brophy J.J., Goldsack R.J., Copeland L.M., Pala-Paul J. Essential oil of Eryngium L. species from New South Wales (Australia) J. Essent. Oil Res. 2003;15:392–397. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2003.9698619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Flamini G., Tebano M., Cioni P.L. Composition of the essential oil from leafy parts of the shoots, flowers and fruits of Eryngium amethystinum from Amiata Mount (Tuscany, Italy) Food Chem. 2008;107:671–674. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hashemabadi D., Kaviani B. Comparison of essential oil compositions of eryngo (Eryngium caucasicum Trautv.) at different growth phases by hydrodistillation method. Plant Omics. 2010;3:135–139. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pala-Paul J., Usano-Alemany J, Soria A.C., Perez-Alonso M.J., Brophy J.J. Essential oil composition of Eryngium campestre L. growing in different soil types. A preliminary study. Nat. Prod. Comm. 2008;3:1121–1126. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Purup S., Larsen E., Christensen L.P. Differential effects of falcarinol and related aliphatic C17-polyacetylenes on intestinal cell proliferation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57:8290–8296. doi: 10.1021/jf901503a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Christensen L.P. Aliphatic C17-Polyacetylenes of the falcarinol type as potential health promoting compounds in food plants of the Apiaceae family. Recent Pat. Food Nutr. Agric. 2010;3:64–77. doi: 10.2174/2212798411103010064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schinkovitz A., Stavri M., Gibbons S., Bucar F. Antimycobacterial polyacetylenes from Levisticum officinale. Phytother. Res. 2008;22:681–684. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Murashige T., Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962;15:473–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Adams R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy. 4th. Allured Publishing Corporation; Carol Stream, IL, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Joulain D., König W.A. The Atlas of Spectral Data of Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons. E.B.-Verlag; Hamburg, Germany: 1998. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES