Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Nov 29;13(11):e0208564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208564

Correction: Palliative care team consultation and quality of death and dying in a university hospital: A secondary analysis of a prospective study

Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, Frederika E Witkamp, Lia van Zuylen, Carin C D van der Rijt, Agnes van der Heide
PMCID: PMC6264806  PMID: 30496291

In Tables 6 and 7, the p-values presented did not reflect the Holm Bonferroni correction. The text and conclusions of the article are based on the corrected p-values. Please see the corrected Tables 6 and 7 here.

Table 6. End of life discussions, awareness and life closure according to relatives (N = 175).

Without PCT consultation
n (%)
With PCT consultation
n(%)
X2 P value
Patient had discussed preferences for medical treatment at end of life with somebody. Yes 57 (62) 59 (82) 7.79 0.070
No 35 (38) 13 (18)
Missing 6 5
Patient had discussed preferences for medical treatment at end of life with family Yes 58 (59) 60 (78) 6.89 0.117
No 40 (41) 17 (22)
Missing 0 0
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a GP Yes 15 (16) 27 (38) 9.52 0.030
No 77 (84) 45 (62)
Missing 6 5
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a medical specialist Yes 24 (26) 27 (38) 2.46 0.468
No 68 (74) 45 (62)
Missing 6 5
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a nurse Yes 6 (7) 9 (13) 1.74 0.564
No 86 (93) 63 (87)
Missing 6 5
Preferences were met? Yes 12 (48) 13 (52) 0.108 1.000
No 45 (52) 42 (48)
Missing 41 22
Would the relatives preferred to have more discussions on preferences and medical treatment? Yes 23 (26) 23 (32) 1.02 1.000
No 48 (53) 33 (46)
DK* 19 (21) 15 (21)
Missing 8 6
Patient was aware of imminent death Yes 20 (22) 28 (39) 7.02 0.270
No 60 (64) 32 (45)
DK 13 (14) 11 (16)
Missing 3 4
At what moment was the patient aware of imminent death? >72h 7 (13) 20 (35) 7.95 0.216
<72h 32 (59) 28 (49)
DK 15 (28) 9 (16)
Missing 44 20
Patient was able to say goodbye Yes 38 (40) 39 (56) 8.03 0.216
No 55 (59) 27(39)
DK 1 (1) 4 (6)
Missing 4 7
Patient was at peace with imminent death Yes 34 (38) 42 (57) 6.81 0.297
No 28 (31) 18 (25)
DK 28 (31) 13 (18)
Missing 8 4
Relative was aware of imminent death Yes 37 (40) 43 (59) 6.01 0.322
No 53 (58) 28 (38)
DK 2 (2) 2 (3)
Missing 6 4
At what moment was the relative aware of imminent death? >72h 20 (32) 30 (48) 3.35 0.335
<72h 42 (68) 32 (52)
Missing 36 15
Relative said goodbye to patient Yes 44 (46) 44 (62) 4.00 0.322
No 51 (54) 27 (38)
Missing 3 6
Relative was present at moment of death Yes 71 (75) 63 (88) 4.21 0.320
No 24 (25) 9 (12)
Missing 3 5

P-values were calculated using the Holm-Bonferroni method

*DK = don’t know

Table 7. Hospital care in the last days of life according to relatives (N = 175).

Without PCT consultation
n (%)
With PCT consultation
n(%)
X2 P value
Efforts to alleviate symptoms and problems last 3 days before death were sufficient Yes 51 (56) 43 (61) 3.89 1.000
No 7 (8) 9 (13)
Partly 20 (22) 8 (11)
NA* 10 (11) 8 (11)
DK** 3 (3) 3 (4)
Missing 7 6
Efforts to alleviate symptoms and problems last 24 hours before death were sufficient Yes 62 (77) 48 (71) 0.53 1.000
No 9 (10) 7 (10)
Partly 13 (15) 10 (15)
DK 2 (2) 3 (4)
Missing 12 9
Social support the last 3 days before death were sufficient Yes 49 (54) 32 (46) 4.28 1.000
No 11 (12) 15 (21)
Partly 12 (13) 13 (19)
NA 11 (12) 7 (10)
DK 7 (8) 3 (4)
Missing 8 7
Social support the last 24 hours before death were sufficient Yes 54 (61) 43 (66) 3.66 1.000
No 10 (11) 10 (15)
Partly 17 (19) 11 (17)
DK 7 (8) 1 (2)
Missing 10 12
In the last days of life, patient participated sufficiently in decision making on medical treatment Yes 45 (52) 34 (50) 0.14 1.000
No 14 (16) 10 (15)
Sometimes 15 (17) 13 (19)
DK 14 (16) 11 (16)
Missing 10 9
In the last days of life, relative participated sufficiently in decision making on medical treatment Yes 65 (74) 47(67) 0.97 1.000
No 17 (19) 18 (26)
DK 6 (7) 5 (7)
Missing 10 7
Did the relative receive sufficient information in the last days before death? Yes 66 (73) 51 (72) 1.60 1.000
Too much 1 (1) 3 (4)
Too little 23 (26) 17 (24)
Missing 8 6
Information that was given to the relative was understandable Yes 71 (79) 49 (68) 2.71 1.000
No 1 (1) 1 (1)
Partly 12 (13) 13 (18)
No info 6 (7) 9 (13)
Missing 8 5
Relatives were informed about imminent death Yes 53 (58) 46 (64) 0.54 1.000
No 38 (42) 26 (36)
Missing 7 5
Opportunity to discuss personal or religious preferences was sufficient Yes 46 (53) 45 (64) 6.536 0.532
No 15 (17) 16 (23)
DK 26 (30) 9 (13)
Missing 11 7
Attention was paid to personal or religious preferences Yes 47 (51) 40 (56) 2.60 1.000
No 7 (8) 10 (14)
DK 35 (39) 21 (29)
Missing 9 6
Attention to preferred rituals at the moment of death was sufficient Yes 40 (49) 36 (58) 3.67 1.000
No 8 (10) 10 (16)
DK 34 (41) 17 (27)
Missing 16 14
Affirmation of the patient as a whole person was sufficient Yes 56 (61) 40 (58) 2.02 1.000
No 8 (9) 6 (9)
Partly 19 (12) 12 (17)
DK 8 (9) 11 (16)
Missing 7 8
Attention to wishes of patient and relatives in the days before death was sufficient Yes 63 (70) 55 (77) 2.30 1.000
No 7 (8) 6 (9)
Partly 11 (12) 7 (10)
DK 9 (10) 3 (4)
Missing 8 6

P-values were calculated using the Holm-Bonferroni method

*NA = Not applicable

** Don’t know

Reference

  • 1.Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Witkamp FE, van Zuylen L, van der Rijt CCD, van der Heide A (2018) Palliative care team consultation and quality of death and dying in a university hospital: A secondary analysis of a prospective study. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0201191 10.1371/journal.pone.0201191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES