In Tables 6 and 7, the p-values presented did not reflect the Holm Bonferroni correction. The text and conclusions of the article are based on the corrected p-values. Please see the corrected Tables 6 and 7 here.
Table 6. End of life discussions, awareness and life closure according to relatives (N = 175).
Without PCT consultation n (%) |
With PCT consultation n(%) |
X2 | P value† | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient had discussed preferences for medical treatment at end of life with somebody. | Yes | 57 (62) | 59 (82) | 7.79 | 0.070 |
No | 35 (38) | 13 (18) | |||
Missing | 6 | 5 | |||
Patient had discussed preferences for medical treatment at end of life with family | Yes | 58 (59) | 60 (78) | 6.89 | 0.117 |
No | 40 (41) | 17 (22) | |||
Missing | 0 | 0 | |||
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a GP | Yes | 15 (16) | 27 (38) | 9.52 | 0.030 |
No | 77 (84) | 45 (62) | |||
Missing | 6 | 5 | |||
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a medical specialist | Yes | 24 (26) | 27 (38) | 2.46 | 0.468 |
No | 68 (74) | 45 (62) | |||
Missing | 6 | 5 | |||
Patient had discussed preferences for medical care at end of life with a nurse | Yes | 6 (7) | 9 (13) | 1.74 | 0.564 |
No | 86 (93) | 63 (87) | |||
Missing | 6 | 5 | |||
Preferences were met? | Yes | 12 (48) | 13 (52) | 0.108 | 1.000 |
No | 45 (52) | 42 (48) | |||
Missing | 41 | 22 | |||
Would the relatives preferred to have more discussions on preferences and medical treatment? | Yes | 23 (26) | 23 (32) | 1.02 | 1.000 |
No | 48 (53) | 33 (46) | |||
DK* | 19 (21) | 15 (21) | |||
Missing | 8 | 6 | |||
Patient was aware of imminent death | Yes | 20 (22) | 28 (39) | 7.02 | 0.270 |
No | 60 (64) | 32 (45) | |||
DK | 13 (14) | 11 (16) | |||
Missing | 3 | 4 | |||
At what moment was the patient aware of imminent death? | >72h | 7 (13) | 20 (35) | 7.95 | 0.216 |
<72h | 32 (59) | 28 (49) | |||
DK | 15 (28) | 9 (16) | |||
Missing | 44 | 20 | |||
Patient was able to say goodbye | Yes | 38 (40) | 39 (56) | 8.03 | 0.216 |
No | 55 (59) | 27(39) | |||
DK | 1 (1) | 4 (6) | |||
Missing | 4 | 7 | |||
Patient was at peace with imminent death | Yes | 34 (38) | 42 (57) | 6.81 | 0.297 |
No | 28 (31) | 18 (25) | |||
DK | 28 (31) | 13 (18) | |||
Missing | 8 | 4 | |||
Relative was aware of imminent death | Yes | 37 (40) | 43 (59) | 6.01 | 0.322 |
No | 53 (58) | 28 (38) | |||
DK | 2 (2) | 2 (3) | |||
Missing | 6 | 4 | |||
At what moment was the relative aware of imminent death? | >72h | 20 (32) | 30 (48) | 3.35 | 0.335 |
<72h | 42 (68) | 32 (52) | |||
Missing | 36 | 15 | |||
Relative said goodbye to patient | Yes | 44 (46) | 44 (62) | 4.00 | 0.322 |
No | 51 (54) | 27 (38) | |||
Missing | 3 | 6 | |||
Relative was present at moment of death | Yes | 71 (75) | 63 (88) | 4.21 | 0.320 |
No | 24 (25) | 9 (12) | |||
Missing | 3 | 5 |
† P-values were calculated using the Holm-Bonferroni method
*DK = don’t know
Table 7. Hospital care in the last days of life according to relatives (N = 175).
Without PCT consultation n (%) |
With PCT consultation n(%) |
X2 | P value† | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Efforts to alleviate symptoms and problems last 3 days before death were sufficient | Yes | 51 (56) | 43 (61) | 3.89 | 1.000 |
No | 7 (8) | 9 (13) | |||
Partly | 20 (22) | 8 (11) | |||
NA* | 10 (11) | 8 (11) | |||
DK** | 3 (3) | 3 (4) | |||
Missing | 7 | 6 | |||
Efforts to alleviate symptoms and problems last 24 hours before death were sufficient | Yes | 62 (77) | 48 (71) | 0.53 | 1.000 |
No | 9 (10) | 7 (10) | |||
Partly | 13 (15) | 10 (15) | |||
DK | 2 (2) | 3 (4) | |||
Missing | 12 | 9 | |||
Social support the last 3 days before death were sufficient | Yes | 49 (54) | 32 (46) | 4.28 | 1.000 |
No | 11 (12) | 15 (21) | |||
Partly | 12 (13) | 13 (19) | |||
NA | 11 (12) | 7 (10) | |||
DK | 7 (8) | 3 (4) | |||
Missing | 8 | 7 | |||
Social support the last 24 hours before death were sufficient | Yes | 54 (61) | 43 (66) | 3.66 | 1.000 |
No | 10 (11) | 10 (15) | |||
Partly | 17 (19) | 11 (17) | |||
DK | 7 (8) | 1 (2) | |||
Missing | 10 | 12 | |||
In the last days of life, patient participated sufficiently in decision making on medical treatment | Yes | 45 (52) | 34 (50) | 0.14 | 1.000 |
No | 14 (16) | 10 (15) | |||
Sometimes | 15 (17) | 13 (19) | |||
DK | 14 (16) | 11 (16) | |||
Missing | 10 | 9 | |||
In the last days of life, relative participated sufficiently in decision making on medical treatment | Yes | 65 (74) | 47(67) | 0.97 | 1.000 |
No | 17 (19) | 18 (26) | |||
DK | 6 (7) | 5 (7) | |||
Missing | 10 | 7 | |||
Did the relative receive sufficient information in the last days before death? | Yes | 66 (73) | 51 (72) | 1.60 | 1.000 |
Too much | 1 (1) | 3 (4) | |||
Too little | 23 (26) | 17 (24) | |||
Missing | 8 | 6 | |||
Information that was given to the relative was understandable | Yes | 71 (79) | 49 (68) | 2.71 | 1.000 |
No | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | |||
Partly | 12 (13) | 13 (18) | |||
No info | 6 (7) | 9 (13) | |||
Missing | 8 | 5 | |||
Relatives were informed about imminent death | Yes | 53 (58) | 46 (64) | 0.54 | 1.000 |
No | 38 (42) | 26 (36) | |||
Missing | 7 | 5 | |||
Opportunity to discuss personal or religious preferences was sufficient | Yes | 46 (53) | 45 (64) | 6.536 | 0.532 |
No | 15 (17) | 16 (23) | |||
DK | 26 (30) | 9 (13) | |||
Missing | 11 | 7 | |||
Attention was paid to personal or religious preferences | Yes | 47 (51) | 40 (56) | 2.60 | 1.000 |
No | 7 (8) | 10 (14) | |||
DK | 35 (39) | 21 (29) | |||
Missing | 9 | 6 | |||
Attention to preferred rituals at the moment of death was sufficient | Yes | 40 (49) | 36 (58) | 3.67 | 1.000 |
No | 8 (10) | 10 (16) | |||
DK | 34 (41) | 17 (27) | |||
Missing | 16 | 14 | |||
Affirmation of the patient as a whole person was sufficient | Yes | 56 (61) | 40 (58) | 2.02 | 1.000 |
No | 8 (9) | 6 (9) | |||
Partly | 19 (12) | 12 (17) | |||
DK | 8 (9) | 11 (16) | |||
Missing | 7 | 8 | |||
Attention to wishes of patient and relatives in the days before death was sufficient | Yes | 63 (70) | 55 (77) | 2.30 | 1.000 |
No | 7 (8) | 6 (9) | |||
Partly | 11 (12) | 7 (10) | |||
DK | 9 (10) | 3 (4) | |||
Missing | 8 | 6 |
† P-values were calculated using the Holm-Bonferroni method
*NA = Not applicable
** Don’t know
Reference
- 1.Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Witkamp FE, van Zuylen L, van der Rijt CCD, van der Heide A (2018) Palliative care team consultation and quality of death and dying in a university hospital: A secondary analysis of a prospective study. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0201191 10.1371/journal.pone.0201191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]