Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2018 Nov 15;16(11):e2006450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006450

Heterologous Hsp90 promotes phenotypic diversity through network evolution

Tracy Chih-Ting Koubkova-Yu 1,2,3, Jung-Chi Chao 2, Jun-Yi Leu 1,2,4,*
Editor: Jeff Gore5
PMCID: PMC6264905  PMID: 30439936

Abstract

Biological processes in living cells are often carried out by gene networks in which signals and reactions are integrated through network hubs. Despite their functional importance, it remains unclear to what extent network hubs are evolvable and how alterations impact long-term evolution. We investigated these issues using heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), a central hub of proteostasis networks. When native Hsp90 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells was replaced by the ortholog from hypersaline-tolerant Yarrowia lipolytica that diverged from S. cerevisiae about 270 million years ago, the cells exhibited improved growth in hypersaline environments but compromised growth in others, indicating functional divergence in Hsp90 between the two yeasts. Laboratory evolution shows that evolved Y. lipolytica-HSP90–carrying S. cerevisiae cells exhibit a wider range of phenotypic variation than cells carrying native Hsp90. Identified beneficial mutations are involved in multiple pathways and are often pleiotropic. Our results show that cells adapt to a heterologous Hsp90 by modifying different subnetworks, facilitating the evolution of phenotypic diversity inaccessible to wild-type cells.

Author summary

Biological processes in living cells are often carried out by gene networks. Hubs are highly connected network components important for integrating signal inputs and generating responsive functional outputs. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), a versatile hub in the protein homeostasis network, is a molecular chaperone essential for cell viability in all tested eukaryotic cells. In yeast, about a quarter of the expressed proteins are profoundly influenced when Hsp90 activity is reduced. Despite its pivotal role, we found that the function of Hsp90 has diverged between two yeast species, Yarrowia lipolytica and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which split about 270 million years ago. To understand the impacts and adaptive strategies in cells with an altered network hub, we conducted laboratory evolution experiments using a S. cerevisiae strain in which native Hsp90 is replaced by its counterpart in Y. lipolytica. We observed different fitness gain or loss under various stress conditions in individual evolved clones, suggesting that cells adapted via different evolutionary paths. Genome sequencing and mutation reconstitution experiments show that beneficial mutations occurred in multiple Hsp90-related pathways that interact with each other. Our results show that a perturbed network allows cells to evolve a broader range of phenotypic diversity unavailable to wild-type cells.

Introduction

Biological functions are often considered the collective output of genes interacting coordinately in a network [14]. Although most genes in a network only have a few links, some “hub” genes are highly connected to network components and play a vital role in maintaining intra-network connectivity [2]. As a consequence, hub genes usually possess pleiotropic functions and have a profound influence on cell fitness [5, 6]. Phenotypic variation was enhanced in yeast cells in which hub genes were disrupted, revealing a role for hub genes in network robustness against genetic or environmental perturbations [7]. Comparative genomics has shown that some hub genes can diverge significantly at the sequence level. However, little is known about to what extent the function of hub genes can change over long-term evolution or how changes in hub genes influence the evolutionary trajectory of an entire network.

The molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) represents a well-documented network hub. Hsp90 is present in bacteria, fungi, plants, and animals [8] and is essential for cell viability in all studied eukaryotic species [913]. Large-scale studies in S. cerevisiae indicate that Hsp90 is one of the central hubs in both physical and genetic interaction networks [14, 15]. More than 10% of the whole yeast and human proteomes have been shown to be clients of Hsp90 [16]. Moreover, the yeast Hsp90-dependent proteome is enriched with other hubs and essential genes [17].

In general, Hsp90 acts at a late stage of protein folding. It assists partially folded clients to reach structural maturation [16], or it stabilizes the components of multi-subunit protein complexes and facilitates their assembly [1820]. Hsp90 has a high degree of specificity for client recognition, which is attributed to its sophisticated co-chaperone system [21, 22]. Interestingly, it has been found that the activity or stability of some Hsp90 client proteins can become Hsp90 independent after introducing mutations [23, 24], suggesting that the link between Hsp90 and its clients may be changed over time.

Apart from these physiological functions, Hsp90 has been suggested to buffer genetic and nongenetic variations to ensure developmental stability in fungi, plants, and animals [2528]. Organisms exhibit constant phenotypes under normal conditions, even if they host genetic or nongenetic variations. However, when Hsp90 activity is compromised or titrated by extreme environmental stresses, heterogeneous phenotypes are revealed in a population. This increased phenotypic diversity is hypothesized to help the population survive or adapt during drastic environmental changes [29].

To understand the implications of hub evolution, we replaced the Hsp90-coding gene of S. cerevisiae with orthologs from other yeast species and examined their functions. S. cerevisiae cells carrying Y. lipolytica-Hsp90 (Ylip-Hsp90) exhibited decreased fitness in most tested conditions but improved growth in high-salt medium, suggesting that the function of Ylip-Hsp90 has differentiated from its S. cerevisiae ortholog. We further evolved the Ylip-Hsp90–hosting strain to study how cells respond to a changed network hub. The evolved clones adopted various evolutionary trajectories, but none involved changing the heterologous Hsp90 per se. Furthermore, fitness measurements in different stress environments showed that these clones had evolved diverged phenotypes that differed from each other and also deviated from wild-type S. cerevisiae cells.

Results

Replacing an essential hub gene HSP90 with the Y. lipolytica ortholog increases salt tolerance of S. cerevisiae cells

Hsp90 is an essential hub protein that interacts with 10%–20% of the whole yeast proteome, and changes to Hsp90 are probably constrained by the function of its client proteins or even the network structure [16]. To investigate whether Hsp90 protein function has changed during evolution, we replaced the endogenous Hsp90 gene in S. cerevisiae with the plasmids carrying its orthologs from Naumovozyma castellii (Ncas), Kluyveromyces lactis (Klac), and Y. lipolytica (Ylip), which diverged from the common ancestor of S. cerevisiae (Scer) at different times [30, 31] (Fig 1A). Our previous data showed that the original promoters of the orthologs from distant species often do not function properly in S. cerevisiae cells. Therefore, we placed the coding sequences of Scer-HSC82 (one of the genes encoding Hsp90 in S. cerevisiae) and its orthologous genes under a strong tetracycline operator 7 repeats (TetO7) promoter, which enabled us to study changes in protein function and to also control expression levels. We then examined these Hsp90-ortholog replacement strains (denominated as Ncas-HSP90, Klac-HSP90, and Ylip-HSP90) under different growth conditions.

Fig 1. Orthologous gene replacements reveal functional divergence of Hsp90 among different yeast species.

Fig 1

(A) Construction scheme of the HSP90 ortholog replacement strains and phylogenetic information on the ortholog-providing species. Both copies of Hsp90-coding genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae were deleted and the Hsp90 function is performed by the orthologs from other species. The bottom table shows pairwise amino acid sequence identity and similarity between Scer-Hsc82 and its orthologs (BLOSUM62, EMBOSS Water local alignment). (B) Ylip-HSP90 replacement strains show reduced fitness in YPD media at normal, low, or high temperature but increased fitness in the YPD media containing NaCl or LiCl at 28°C. Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by Infinite 200 plate readers. p-values were calculated by two-tailed Student t test with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 4. The numerical data used in panel (B) are included in S1 Data. See also S1 Fig. BLOSUM62, BLOcks SUbstitution Matrix 62; EMBOSS, European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite; Klac, Kluyveromyces lactis; mya, million years ago; Ncas, Naumovozyma castellii; OD, optical density; ortho., ortholog; pRS413, yeast single-copy plasmid; pTetO7, tetracycline operator 7 repeats promoter; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica; YPD, Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose.

To examine how orthologous Hsp90 proteins influence the physiology of hosting S. cerevisiae strains, we measured the fitness of replacement strains under 17 different growth conditions using spot assays (see Materials and methods). For most test conditions, Ncas-Hsp90 and Klac-Hsp90 hosting strains exhibited similar fitness as Scer-Hsc82–carrying cells (Fig 1, S1 Fig and S1 Table), indicating that the function of Hsp90 is not drastically different among N. castellii, K. lactis, and S. cerevisiae. In contrast, the Ylip-Hsp90 hosting strain exhibited lower fitness than Scer-Hsc82 cells under most conditions; similar fitness to Scer-Hsc82 cells in media containing 150 mM MgCl2, 1.8 M sorbitol, or 0.5 M NaCl; and higher fitness under two hypersaline conditions (media containing 1 M NaCl or 0.2 M LiCl, see Fig 1B, S1 Fig and S1 Table). The phenotypic differences between Ylip-Hsp90– and Scer-Hsc82–carrying cells might be due to differences in the expression level, activity, or/and specificity of these two orthologs. No significant difference was observed when the protein levels of Ylip-Hsp90 and Scer-Hsc82 were measured using western blots (S2A Fig). To test whether the activity of Ylip-Hsp90 is different than that of Scer-Hsc82, we performed a v-src kinase assay. Hsp90 is required for the activation of v-src and, therefore, by measuring the level of v-src–dependent tyrosine phosphorylation, the activity of Hsp90 can be estimated [32]. In the kinase assay, we observed similar levels of v-src–dependent tyrosine phosphorylation in Ylip-Hsp90– and Scer-Hsc82–carrying cells (S2B Fig), suggesting that the main difference between Ylip-Hsp90 and Scer-Hsc82 is the interaction specificity instead of the activity.

Y. lipolytica cells are often isolated from hypersaline environments and exhibit high tolerance to NaCl and LiCl (S2C Fig) [33, 34]. Previous research in S. cerevisiae suggested that Hsp90 plays a crucial role in salt stress tolerance by regulating the activity of its client, calcineurin [35]. Hsp90 is essential for activation of calcineurin. However, overexpression of Hsp90 also led to salt hypersensitivity because calcineurin was sequestered by Hsp90. The increased salt resistance in Ylip-Hsp90 hosting cells suggests that the interaction between Ylip-Hsp90 and calcineurin may have been changed or Ylip-Hsp90 can facilitate the activity of other proteins involved in hypersaline growth. The altered growth pattern of Ylip-Hsp90 hosting cells reveals that the function of Hsp90 has significantly diverged between Y. lipolytica and S. cerevisiae. Moreover, our findings indicate that even a central network hub like Hsp90 can change significantly over the course of long-term evolution.

Adaptation to a heterologous Hsp90 in laboratory evolution experiments

Alteration of a network hub often has a strong impact on cell fitness [5, 6]. Cells may be selected to quickly restore the original functions of the hub, or the network may be rewired to accommodate or compensate for the altered hub. In the latter scenario, it may also open the possibility for cells to evolve novel phenotypes. To explore the possible evolutionary trajectories of an altered Hsp90 network, we evolved 12 independent haploid lines carrying Ylip-HSP90 and 12 control lines carrying Scer-HSC82 that were all derived from the same parental S. cerevisiae clone. These cell lines were grown in regular rich medium (Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose [YPD]) at 28°C so that their major selective pressure is to restore the general growth defects caused by Ylip-HSP90. In each evolving culture, two isogenic strains carrying either the green or red fluorescent protein marker (Fig 2A) were mixed at an approximate initial ratio of 1:1. By monitoring the proportions of the two fluorescence-labeled populations at different time points, we could estimate when the first beneficial mutation was fixed in each culture (S3 Fig). In the Ylip-HSP90 lines, more than half of the cultures fixed the first beneficial mutation within 450 generations (Fig 2B). It took another 200 generations for the Scer-HSC82 lines to reach similar proportions of fixation. This outcome is consistent with the assumption that Ylip-HSP90 hosting cells were initially under high selective pressure to resolve the incompatibility between the heterologous Ylip-Hsp90 and its interactive network in the S. cerevisiae background. In contrast, the Scer-HSC82 lines only experienced very low or no selective pressure, because the evolution experiments were conducted under a normal growth condition.

Fig 2. Evolving Ylip-HSP90 lines fix the first beneficial mutations more quickly and have better fitness improvements.

Fig 2

(A) Experimental evolution for adaptation to a heterologous Hsp90. Twelve Ylip-HSP90 evolving lines and 12 Scer-HSC82 control lines were set up to evolve in rich media at 28°C. Two isogenic subpopulations (red: DsRed-labeled subpopulation; green: GFP-labeled subpopulation) were mixed in an approximate ratio of 1:1 in the initial cultures. The subpopulation that obtained a beneficial mutation (noted by a star) would start expanding its frequency in the evolved culture. (B) The Ylip-HSP90 lines become fixed more quickly than the Scer-HSC82 lines. The mutation fixation of each culture was determined as the time when the frequency of a subpopulation was observed to be greater than 95% according to flow cytometry. The control line con6 and the evolving lines, evo1, evo2, and evo12 were excluded because of culture contamination during evolution. The frequency dynamics of each evolved line are shown in S3 Fig. (C) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 populations have enhanced fitness improvements compared with evolved Scer-HSC82 populations in YPD at 28°C (p-value = 4.54 × 10−7, t = −7.97, df = 15, one-tailed Student t test, unequal variance; data did not deviate from the normal distribution, Shapiro-Wilk test). Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by plate readers. Fitness improvement was calculated according to the formula [(fitness of the evolved culture/fitness of the ancestral strain) − 1] × 100%. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 4. The numerical data used in panels (B, C) are included in S1 Data. DsRed, red fluorescent protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica; YPD, Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose.

After evolving for around 2,200 generations, three Ylip-HSP90 (evo1, evo2, and evo12) lines and one Scer-HSC82 (con6) line were lost because of contamination. We further analyzed the remaining evolved cultures. The fitness of evolved Ylip-HSP90 populations in YPD at 28°C improved by 16%–24% compared with their ancestor (Fig 2C). The degree of improvement was significantly higher than that observed in the evolved Scer-HSC82 populations, suggesting that the adaptive phenotype is likely to be Ylip-HSP90 specific. When the fitness of evolved Scer-HSC82 clones was compared with their ancestor, no significant difference was observed in four evolved lines (S2 Table), suggesting that both genetic drift and beneficial mutations contributed to the evolved phenotypes of Scer-HSC82 populations.

To characterize the evolved phenotype, we isolated three single colonies from each evolved culture and measured their fitness. The colonies with the highest fitness from each population were chosen to represent the lineage for further examination (denominated E3 to E11 for evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones and C1 to C12 for evolved Scer-HSC82 clones). It was previously reported that S. cerevisiae cells often converge to a diploid state during laboratory evolution [36]. We examined the genome content of evolved clones using flow cytometry and found that all of the evolved Scer-HSC82 clones had become diploid or triploid (S4A Fig). In contrast, most of the evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones remained haploid, except for E10, which had become diploid. To ensure that the ploidy expansion observed in individual clones is representative of the whole population, we also examined the evolved cultures using flow cytometry and observed the same results. Because all the cultures were evolved under the same selective regime, the difference in ploidy observed in evolved cultures further implicates functional divergence between Ylip-Hsp90 and Scer-Hsc82. To further test the effect of Hsp90 on ploidy expansion or maintenance, we generated diploid strains by mating haploid cells and compared their fitness with haploid strains. Haploid Ylip-HSP90–carrying cells exhibited higher fitness than diploid Ylip-HSP90–carrying cells (S4B Fig). This result provides the possible reason why most Ylip-HSP90 lines remained haploid after evolution.

Fitness improvement in the evolved clones is specific to Ylip-Hsp90

Because the evolved clones restored the fitness of Ylip-HSP90 cells in rich media, we wondered whether they would become sensitive to hypersaline stress like Scer-HSC82 cells. When evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones were tested on 0.2 M LiCl-containing plates, they displayed similar or higher fitness compared with ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strains (Fig 3A), indicating that the Y. lipolytica-specific hypersaline-resistant phenotype had been stably maintained in the Hsp90 network of the evolved cells.

Fig 3. Phenotypic adaptation and innovation of the evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones.

Fig 3

(A) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones remain highly tolerant to LiCl. Serially diluted cell cultures were spotted onto the plates and incubated at 28°C until colonies became visible. G and R indicate the ancestral strains carrying the green and red fluorescent proteins, respectively. (B) The fitness improvements of evolved clones are specific to Ylip-Hsp90. The fitness improvements were significantly diminished when the Ylip-HSP90 gene in the evolved clones was replaced with Scer-HSC82 (p-value = 6.82 × 10−7, t = 15.07, and df = 7, one-tailed paired Student t test; data did not deviate from the normal distribution, Shapiro-Wilk test). Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by plate readers. Fitness improvement was calculated by comparing the fitness in YPD at 28°C between evolved and ancestral clones carrying the same plasmid. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 4. (C) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones show different levels of protein homeostasis restoration. Cells carrying Hsp104-BFP were grown at 25°C and then shifted to 37°C to induce heat adaptation. The fraction of cells containing Hsp104-BFP foci was counted at 0, 1, and 3 hours after the temperature shift. At least seven replicates were measured for each strain, and more than 75 cells were counted for each replicate. Asterisks indicate that the fraction of cells containing Hsp104-BFP foci is significantly lower compared with ancestral Ylip-HSP90 cells from the same time point (p-value < 0.01 after the Benjamini-Hochberg correction, N ≥ 7, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). (D) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones E3, E4, and E9 recover from elongated cell morphology, whereas E5 and E11 become even more elongated than the ancestor. The ratio of the long- versus short-axis diameter of each cell was measured, and more than 80 cells were examined for each strain. The distribution of each sample was compared to ancestral Ylip-HSP90 cells and asterisks indicate a p-value <0.01 after the Benjamini-Hochberg correction by two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The numerical data used in panels (B, C, D) are included in S1 Data. See also S5 Fig. BFP, blue fluorescent protein; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica; YPD, Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose.

The function of Ylip-Hsp90 might be enhanced if its expression level is increased or the protein is mutated in the evolved clones. We measured protein levels of Ylip-HSP90 using western blots. All evolved clones presented similar levels of the Hsp90 protein compared to the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strains (S4C Fig). We also sequenced the Ylip-HSP90 gene of all evolved clones and found no mutation in any of them. Together, these data indicate that the evolved cells had not improved their fitness by modifying the Ylip-HSP90 gene.

The observed fitness improvement in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones might be specific to the heterologous Hsp90 or simply be due to mutations that enhance general cell proliferation (e.g., loss of the costly genes or gain of glucose uptake genes). To differentiate between these two possibilities, we replaced the Ylip-HSP90 gene of the evolved and ancestral clones with Scer-HSC82 and measured their fitness in YPD at 28°C. The extent of fitness improvements was drastically diminished when Ylip-Hsp90 was replaced (Fig 3B and S2 Table), indicating that the beneficial effects of evolved mutations are dependent on Ylip-Hsp90.

Protein homeostasis improves to varying degrees in individual evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones

Because Hsp90 is an important molecular chaperone involved in maintaining protein homeostasis, we suspected that the reduced fitness of ancestral Ylip-HSP90 cells in normal conditions might reflect disturbed internal proteostasis caused by the compromised Hsp90 network. We used an Hsp104 aggregation assay to investigate this possibility [37]. Hsp104 is a disaggregase that localizes to protein aggregates upon heat stress and helps with the disaggregation and refolding process. Ancestral and evolved cells containing fluorescent Hsp104-BFP fusion protein were first grown at 25°C and then shifted to 37°C for high-temperature adaptation. By monitoring the fraction of cells containing Hsp104-BFP foci during heat treatment, we could assess how well protein homeostasis is maintained.

Ancestral Ylip-HSP90 cells contained more Hsp104-BFP foci than Scer-HSC82 cells before and during heat treatment, suggesting that Ylip-HSP90 cells indeed have a high endogenous proteome burden even before heat treatment (Fig 3C and S5A Fig). Interestingly, even though all evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones had improved their fitness to the wild-type level, not all of them could restore their ability to efficiently clear protein aggregates. E11 cells exhibited a disaggregation pattern similar to ancestral Ylip-HSP90 cells. In contrast, E7 cells had lower levels of Hsp104-BFP foci at initial and later time points compared with Scer-HSC82 cells (Fig 3C, S5A and S5B Fig). Our results suggest that different evolved lines probably took different paths to fix the compromised Hsp90 network.

In addition to attenuated protein homeostasis, ancestral Ylip-HSP90 cells also exhibited an elongated cell morphology that has previously been observed in cells lacking sufficient Hsp90 activity to stabilize its client proteins [28]. When we examined the cell morphology of evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones, we found that only E3, E4, and E9 cells recovered from the elongated cell morphology. E5 and E11 evolved to an even more elongated form, whereas the remaining clones were not significantly different than their ancestor (Fig 3D and S5C Fig). These results reinforce that different adaptive paths had been taken by the individual evolved lines.

Independent Ylip-HSP90 clones evolved through different adaptive trajectories

Both the Hsp104 aggregation assay and our cell morphology measurements suggested that the phenotypes of evolved Ylip-HSP90 lines are diverged from each other and from their ancestor and Scer-HSC82 cells. To obtain a more complete picture of the evolved phenotypes, we subjected the evolved clones to two growth media and nine different stress conditions that challenge different aspects of protein homeostasis and then measured their fitness (see Materials and methods). Our results revealed a broad spectrum of adaptive phenotypes in the evolved clones (Fig 4A and S2 Table) so that, even if some strains shared similar fitness levels for one or two conditions, their fitness levels differed under other conditions. Moreover, for many of the conditions we tested, the evolved clones exhibited higher fitness than Scer-HSC82 cells (S2 Table and Fig 4A). We also tested whether the observed fitness was correlated with the protein abundance of Hsp90 in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones. No significant correlation was observed in any tested condition (S3 Table).

Fig 4. Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones exhibit diverged adaptive phenotypes in different conditions.

Fig 4

(A) Fitness improvements of the evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones under 11 different growth conditions, many of which challenge different aspects of protein homeostasis. Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by plate readers. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 3. Unless specified otherwise, cells were grown at 28°C. Fitness improvement was calculated by comparing the fitness of the evolved (or Scer-HSC82) clone with that of the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strain. (B) Hierarchical clustering of the fitness values (i.e., growth rates) reveals divergent evolution of the Ylip-HSP90 clones. For many of the conditions, some evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones display enhanced fitness compared with Scer-HSC82 clones. Individual fitness values were divided by the mean of all fitness values in the same condition to normalize the fitness data to a similar scale between conditions. The color code represents the normalized fitness value (red: high fitness; blue: low fitness). (C) PCA of the fitness values shows that all Ylip-HSP90 clones evolved diverged phenotypes, scattered across the three principal component dimensions. Explanatory power is shown in brackets next to each principal component. (D) The evolved phenotypes of Ylip-HSP90 clones are more diverse than those of Scer-HSC82 clones. Pearson correlation distance (d = 1 − Pearson correlation coefficient) was used to measure whether the evolved clones displayed similar fitness trends under different conditions. A smaller distance indicates a higher similarity between the two conditions. In general, phenotypic distances for evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones were significantly greater than those of evolved Scer-HSC82 clones (p = 0.001, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test), suggesting that evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones have more divergent phenotypes. The color code represents the Pearson correlation distance value (cyan: high similarity; red: low similarity). The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. See also S6 Fig. AZC, azetidine-2-carboxylate; BFA, brefeldin A; CSM, complete supplement mixture; CYH, cycloheximide; Dox, doxycycline; EtOH, ethanol; GuHCl, guanidine hydrochloride; MacII, macbecin II; PC, principal component; PCA, principal component analysis; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica; YPD, Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose.

To obtain a more general overview of the evolved features in different clones, we performed hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) according to their fitness measurements under the 11 tested conditions (Fig 4B and 4C, S6A Fig and S4 Table). Hierarchical clustering revealed that clones E4 and E9 were more similar to Scer-HSC82 cells than other evolved clones. The first principal component (explaining 33.8% of the variance) of our PCA showed that most clones evolved toward the Scer-HSC82 phenotype (S6A Fig). Nonetheless, they were not closely clustered. Phenotypic divergence between the evolved clones was further revealed by the second and third principal components (explaining 28.4% and 14.2% of the variance, respectively). These results suggest that Ylip-HSP90 lines have evolved diverged phenotypes that both differ from each other and from ancestor and Scer-HSC82 cells.

The observed phenotypic variation in the evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones suggests that after the heterologous Hsp90 was introduced, different Hsp90-related functions in individual evolving lines were modified to regain fitness. Under this hypothesis, high phenotypic variation should not occur in the evolved Scer-HSC82 clones (i.e., the control lines), because the network hub has not changed. We performed two types of analysis to address this issue.

We first measured the fitness of evolved Scer-HSC82 clones under the same 11 growth conditions (S6B Fig) and calculated the variance of fitness improvements among evolved Ylip-HSP90 and Scer-HSC82 clones in individual conditions. We then compared the variance between evolved Ylip-HSP90 and Scer-HSC82 groups. The data show that the evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones exhibited greater variance than the evolved Scer-HSC82 group (p-value = 0.039, one-tailed Student t test), indicating that responses of evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones to different stress conditions were more varied than evolved Scer-HSC82 clones (S6C Fig).

In the second analysis, we calculated the Pearson correlation distances between fitness levels under different conditions (see Materials and methods, S5 Table) to quantify the variation in distribution patterns of individual fitness between each pair of conditions. If individual clones show similar ranking patterns for fitness between two conditions, Pearson correlation distances will be small. In contrast, large Pearson correlation distances indicate that individual evolved clones behave very differently in two conditions. Overall, pairwise comparisons revealed that the evolved Scer-HSC82 clones behaved similarly under different stress conditions, except for the complete supplement mixture (CSM) and azetidine-2-carboxylate (AZC) media (Fig 4D and S5 Table). The stress condition–based phenotypic distance of evolved Scer-HSC82 clones is significantly smaller than that of evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones (S6D Fig), supporting our hypothesis that high phenotypic variation only occurred in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones.

Most mutations in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones are associated with various Hsp90-related functions

To explore the genetic basis of the evolved phenotypes, we sequenced the genomes of the evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones. On average, each evolved clone hosted eight protein-sequence-changing mutations (seven nonsynonymous and one insertion/deletion) and 14 total mutations (S7 Fig). The calculated mutation rate (5.45 × 10−10 per bp per generation) is comparable with the estimated spontaneous mutation rates from previous studies [38, 39]. Only a small group of genes were recurrently mutated in multiple evolved clones (i.e., BRE5 in three clones and BUD2, FMP30, SIR3, and HXK2 in two clones, S6 Table). We investigated the BRE5 gene further in the reconstitution experiments. In evolved clones, we found that large-scale copy number variation only occurred in mitochondrial genomes and ribosomal DNA, and that small-scale copy number variation was also rare outside subtelomeric regions (S7 Table).

When the gene functions of all identified protein-sequence-changing mutations were analyzed further (Table 1 and S8 Table), we found that most of them could be categorized into several Hsp90-related functions [14, 40], including protein synthesis, folding and modification, intracellular trafficking, ribosome biogenesis, cellular conjugation, chromatin organization, and signaling, as well as mitochondrial physiology (Fig 5). Many of these genes have known interactions with Hsp90 or belong to the Hsp90-dependent proteome [17, 41], raising the possibility that evolved yeasts might adapt by modifying different Hsp90 subnetworks.

Table 1. Enriched gene ontology (GO) categories of the protein-sequence-changing mutations in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones.

GO categories Genes p-value Enrichment score Functional group
Conjugation BUD3, FIG2, STE7, STE5, SCW4, FUS2, ROD1 1.29 × 10−4 7.21 A
Invasive growth in response to glucose limitation TUP1, FIG2, STE7, STE5, DIA2 1.29 × 10−4 10.89
Cell budding BUD3, BUD4, BUD2, CBK1 1.23 × 10−3 8.67 A
Response to chemicals TUP1, FIG2, RGT2, STE7, STE5, RTG2, FKH1, FUS2, SIS1, ROD1 6.37 × 10−3 2.84
Cell morphogenesis FIG2, FUS2 1.28 × 10−2 7.80 A
Protein modification by small protein conjugation or removal CDC27, HEL2, SIZ1, BRE5, DIA2 1.50 × 10−2 3.77 C
Chromatin organization TUP1, HEL2, RTG2, FKH1, SIR3, HDA1, DIA2 1.54 × 10−2 2.80 H
Signaling RGT2, STE7, STE5, RTG2, TAP42, ROD1 1.54 × 10−2 3.11 I
Nuclear transport RTG2, SRP40, SIS1, ACC1, NOP53 1.54 × 10−2 3.50
Cytokinesis BUD3, BUD4, BUD2 1.73 × 10−2 4.54 A
Regulation of transport TUP1, BRE5, ROD1 1.73 × 10−2 4.54
Protein folding CNS1, CCT7, SIS1 2.35 × 10−2 3.93 D
Regulation of protein modification process STE7, STE5, SIZ1 3.72 × 10−2 3.47
Nuclear organization FUS2, ACC1 4.64 × 10−2 3.90
Ion transport ATP6, YCT1, VPS20, MDM12, SIA1 4.86 × 10−2 2.39

List of significantly enriched GO categories (p-value < 0.05 after the Benjamini-Hochberg correction) among the genes with protein-sequence-changing mutations. Enrichment scores were calculated by dividing the proportion of mutated genes classified into the indicated category by the proportion of those in the genome background. The GO categories overlapped with the Hsp90-related functional groups (Fig 5) are labeled.

Abbreviations: GO, gene ontology; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

Fig 5. Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones contain mutations in the genes involved in Hsp90-related functions.

Fig 5

Most mutant genes identified in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones can be grouped into several Hsp90-related functions, and about one third of them (32%) are Hsp90 interactors or Hsp90-dependent proteins (connected to Hsp90 by lines). Essential genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are displayed as octagonal nodes. The evolved clones containing the recurrent mutant genes are listed as follows: BRE5 in E3, E5, and E11; BUD2 and FMP30 in E3 and E9; HXK2 in E3 and E6; and SIR3 in E8 and E11. Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

Segregant analysis identifies beneficial mutations with strong fitness effects

Not all the mutations in the evolved clones are likely to contribute equally to the adaptive phenotypes. We performed segregant analysis to map the mutations with strong effects in three evolved clones (E4, E5 and E7). These clones were selected because E4 and E5 clones showed opposite trends in cell morphology, and E7 has the largest improvement in protein homeostasis (Fig 3). The evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones were backcrossed to the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strain and their F1 spores (from 40–45 four-viable spore tetrads) were analyzed. In all three evolved clones, our genetic analysis indicated that multiple loci were involved in the evolved phenotypes (S9 Table). The F1 progeny with phenotypes similar to evolved or ancestral clones were grouped into good and bad spore pools, respectively (see Materials and methods). Genomic DNA was isolated from both pools and then subjected to Illumina sequencing.

Based on our computational simulation, two criteria were used to select the mutations with strong effects: (1) the mutation frequency in the good spore pool is greater than 70% or (2) the difference in mutation frequencies between good and bad spore pools is greater than 45%. Nine mutations—sec9-E310K and tap42-F72S from E4; izh3-S115* (* indicating a premature stop codon), bud4-P981fs (fs indicating a frameshift mutation), bre5-L433F, and mdm12-F148S from E5; and siz1-P401L, pbp1-N318fs, and nop53-E289_N290insE (ins indicating an insertion) from E7 (S10 Table)—were identified and used for reconstitution experiments to confirm their effects.

Individual mutations exert condition-specific effects

Our phenotypic assays had revealed that independent Ylip-HSP90 lines evolved diverse phenotypes (Fig 4). To understand how the evolved mutations contribute to the broad spectrum of phenotypes, we used the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system to reintroduce these mutations into the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strain and examined the fitness of these mutants under different stress conditions (Fig 6A, S8 Fig and S11 Table). Four major conclusions can be drawn from the phenotypic assays. First, individual mutations usually had dominant effects under at least one stress condition (e.g., in clone E7, the siz1, pbp1, and nop53 mutants exhibited strongest effects under conditions of 37°C, macbecin II treatment, and doxycycline treatment, respectively), confirming that these mutations really contribute to the evolved phenotypes. Second, several mutations exhibited positive effects under one stress condition but negative effects under others (e.g., in clone E7, pbp1 mutants had a positive effect under macbecin II treatment but a negative effect under the MG132 stress condition), indicating that antagonistic pleiotropy is common among the evolved mutations. Third, in a few stress conditions (e.g., for clone E5 in medium containing macbecin II), the sum of individual effects exceeded the effect observed in the evolved clone, suggesting the existence of negative epistasis between mutations. Fourth, for some other conditions (e.g., clone E4 in medium containing MG132), the sum of all individual effects was still far below the effect observed in evolved clones. This outcome can be explained if there is positive epistasis between mutations. Alternatively, some mutations with weak individual effects but that are strongly epistatic to other mutations might have been missed by our mapping exercise. We selected one mutation from the E4 clone, cbk1-L461F, that exhibited a mutation frequency slightly lower than our segregant analysis criteria to test these possibilities. The cbk1-L461F single mutation did not result in any significant effects under any tested stress condition (Fig 6A). However, when cbk1-L461F was combined with sec9-E310K or tap42-F72S and tested in all conditions, it displayed positive epistatic effects with sec9-E310K and tap42-F72S in medium containing brefeldin A (BFA) and MG132, respectively (Fig 6B and S11 Table).

Fig 6. Allele replacement confirms the contribution of the mapped mutations in evolved phenotypes.

Fig 6

(A) Fitness improvements of the reconstituted clones under 11 growth conditions. Nine mapped strong-effect mutations and cbk1-L461F were reintroduced into the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strain using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, and the fitness of reconstituted clones was then compared with that of the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strain. Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by plate readers. Individual mutations exerted dominant effects in at least one condition, and antagonistic pleiotropy under different stress conditions was widely observed. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 3. Asterisks indicate that the fitness values are significantly different from the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strain (p < 0.05 after the Benjamini-Hochberg correction, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). See also S8 Fig. (B) Positive genetic interactions between cbk1-L461F and the other two mutations result in the fitness improvement not observed in single mutants when grown in media containing BFA or MG132. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 4. Asterisks indicate that the fitness of double mutants is significantly greater than that of single mutants (p < 0.05 after the Benjamini-Hochberg correction, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). (C) All three single mutations in the E7 clone reduce the formation of Hsp104 foci at 37°C, but pbp1-N318fs has the strongest effect. Each measurement was compared with that of ancestral Ylip-HSP90 cells from the same time point, and asterisks indicate a p-value <0.01 after the Benjamini-Hochberg correction, according to one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. N ≥ 14. Error bars are standard errors. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. AZC, azetidine-2-carboxylate; BFA, brefeldin A; CRISPR/Cas9, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9; CSM, complete supplement mixture; CYH, cycloheximide; Dox, doxycycline; EtOH, ethanol; GuHCl, guanidine hydrochloride; L461F, leucine 461 to phenylalanine; MacII, macbecin II; N318fs, asparagine 318 frameshift; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica; YPD, Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose.

In addition to its fitness improvement, our Hsp104 aggregation assay showed that the E7 clone has a strong aggregate clearance phenotype (Fig 3C). This allowed us to characterize the contribution of individual mutations to protein homeostasis. We found that all three single mutations (siz1, pbp1, and nop53) reduced the formation of Hsp104 foci at 37°C, but pbp1-N318fs had the strongest effect (Fig 6C). When all three mutations were combined in a single clone, the further enhanced aggregate clearance phenotype was observed at the 3-hour time point. These results reveal a specific role of pbp1-N318fs in maintaining protein homeostasis under heat stress conditions.

Discussion

The Hsp90 network performs many crucial functions in eukaryotic cells and probably represents a robust system resilient to genetic perturbations [16, 40]. Nevertheless, the ability of Ylip-Hsp90 to enhance hypersaline tolerance in S. cerevisiae cells and the compromised fitness of such cells under other stress conditions indicate that even a central hub like Hsp90 can change its functions or partners during evolution. This seeming discrepancy may be explained by a computational simulation study of complex signaling circuits that showed phenotypic robustness and variability are positively correlated [42]. Because a broad range of genotypes usually supports a robust phenotype, a greater diversity of phenotypes is accessible from among the genotypic neighborhood. This model implies that a robust system like the Hsp90 network can still be genetically adjusted to facilitate adaptation to novel environments. If the Hsp90 network is continually modified in a specific direction (e.g., to tolerate hypersaline stress), it may eventually lead to alterations in a network hub such as Ylip-Hsp90.

Evolvability represents an organism’s capacity to generate selectable phenotypic traits during evolution [43], so the level of evolvability may influence the likelihood of an organism surviving in or adapting to a new habitat. In developmental biology, large phenotypic changes or innovations are often associated with changes in the transcriptional network hubs [4446]. Despite strong evidence supporting a link between network hubs and evolvability, it is difficult to study directly the effect of changed network hubs on evolutionary trajectories using natural populations. Our laboratory evolution experiments provide an alternative approach to address this issue. In the current study, we replaced the Hsp90-coding gene of S. cerevisiae with the ortholog from a distant species. Nonetheless, a similar evolutionary process may occur in nature under the following conditions: (1) a hybrid progeny carries incompatible gene pairs that compromise the function of a network hub. Genetic incompatibility has been observed to exist between closely related species and cause defects in different important cellular functions [47]. Although these types of hybrids have lower fitness and are likely to be eliminated in most cases, they may also create the chance for the organism to evolve new phenotypes, especially in the hybrid zone where hybrids are constantly generated. (2) Mutations occur in critical domains of a hub gene. Mutagenesis experiments in Hsp90 have shown that even a single amino acid change can alter the activity or interacting partners of the protein completely [48]. Such mutations will often result in the low fitness of the cell, as in the hybrid case. However, they may lead to the evolution of new phenotypes if compensatory mutations that restore fitness occur and are subsequently fixed by selection [49]. (3) A multifunctional gene is obtained through horizontal gene transfer (HGT). In recent years, HGT has been shown to occur frequently, even in eukaryotes [50, 51]. A foreign multifunctional protein may disturb the original cellular network and open a new evolutionary path.

Network structures contribute to phenotypic robustness against genetic or environmental perturbations [52]. When network hubs are compromised, pre-existing cryptic genetic or nongenetic variation may be exposed that facilitates short-term population adaptation [7]. Our study reveals a different role played by network hubs in long-term evolution in a population without much genetic variation. S. cerevisiae cells immediately gained hypersaline tolerance like Y. lipolytica cells solely by replacing a single hub gene, HSP90, with the corresponding ortholog. This is similar to a previous observation that bacteria dramatically increased the growth rate at lower temperatures with the introduction of psychrophilic chaperonins [53]. Moreover, the novel Hsp90 allowed individual clonal populations to evolve diverse phenotypes unobserved in cells hosting native Scer-Hsc82. These novel phenotypes may enable evolved cells to explore niches inaccessible to Scer-Hsc82–hosting cells and, in the long term, may broaden opportunities for population diversification and speciation.

Previous laboratory evolution experiments in bacteria showed that when essential ribosomal genes or translation factors were replaced by their orthologs from other bacteria or the ancestral sequence, expression levels of the introduced orthologous genes were often amplified to compensate for the incompatibility [5456]. In our evolved clones, protein levels of Ylip-Hsp90 were not changed, suggesting that the cells were able to quickly gain other mutations to ameliorate the growth defect in the conditions under which they evolved. One major function of network hubs is to coordinate different subnetworks (or pathways) so that the cell can quickly respond to environmental changes. However, when a hub is compromised or altered (such as in the Ylip-Hsp90–hosting cells), any mutation that can improve cell fitness under the existing growth conditions will be selected, even if it has costs in other conditions or distorts the balance between different subnetworks. The evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones restored only some of the functions of Hsp90 despite that all clones had similar or higher fitness in rich medium compared to Scer-HSC82 cells (Figs 3C, 3D and 4).

By sequencing the evolved clones and reconstituting mutations, we confirmed that individual subnetworks of Hsp90 had been modified in different evolved lineages. As expected, some of the evolved mutations showed strong antagonistic pleiotropy, exhibiting improved cell fitness in rich medium but growth defects under other stress conditions. Because cells are constantly challenged by environmental fluctuations, it is likely that another layer of compensatory mutations can be selected to resolve the fitness conflict of pleiotropic mutations under different conditions [57]. These compensatory mutations may not exhibit adaptive effects by themselves but will be epistatic to the previous pleiotropic mutations. This hypothesis is indirectly supported by our reconstitution experiments, which showed that intergenic epistasis is common among the evolved mutations. After obtaining compensatory mutations, modified subnetworks are likely to stay in the lineage and to have a long-term influence on evolutionary paths.

The fact that no mutations occurred in the Ylip-HSP90 gene indicates a strong constraint on the hub, probably due to pleiotropic effects. Therefore, evolved cells resolved the fitness conflict through modifying the functions or structures of some subnetworks. Similar processes have been observed in the evolution of transcription networks. Although different species may share the same transcription factors, the downstream targets of the orthologs could have been rewired greatly [58, 59]. Previous studies of digital organisms have suggested that deleterious mutations might act as stepping stones for the evolution of complex phenotypes inaccessible to the wild type [60, 61]. Our study provides direct evidence that diverse phenotypes can evolve when an essential network hub is altered. Robust networks are often connected to a larger phenotypic space [42]. An initial adaptation to a changed or compromised network hub allows a cell to reshape its network structures in different directions, which further broadens its evolutionary potential (Fig 7).

Fig 7. A model showing how a changed network hub allows the cell to reshape the network structures in different directions to broaden its evolutionary potential.

Fig 7

When a network hub is altered, cells regain fitness by modifying different parts of subnetwork structures. Such events allow cells to pursue different evolutionary paths that are inaccessible to wild-type cells. Evo, evolved line; WT, wild type.

Materials and methods

Construction of the HSP90 replacement strains

All the S. cerevisiae strains were derived from R1158 (JYL1821) containing the tTA transactivator with the CMV promoter that allows us to down-regulate the expression level of the TetO7 promoter–containing gene by adding doxycycline [62]. In S. cerevisiae, the essential function of Hsp90 is performed by two highly similar and functionally redundant genes, HSC82 and HSP82 (protein identity and similarity are 0.969 and 0.987, respectively) [9]. We first generated the HSP90 plasmid shuffling strain (JYL1827) in which both HSC82 and HSP82 were deleted, and the essential Hsp90 functions were performed by an HSC82-containing plasmid (pRS416-Scer-HSC82). The coding regions of HSC82 and its orthologs were PCR amplified from the genomic DNA or cDNA of S. cerevisiae, N. castellii, K. lactis, or Y. lipolytica and cloned into a plasmid (pRS413-pTetO7) containing the kanR-TetO7-TATACYC1 cassette from RP188 [63]. These ortholog-containing plasmids were then transformed into the shuffling strain to replace pRS416-Scer-HSC82. The ortholog-replacement strains were checked using PCR to confirm the loss of pRS416-Scer-HSC82 and are denominated as JYL5001 (Scer-HSC82), JYL1831 (Ncas-HSP90), JYL1833 (Klac-HSP90), and JYL1835 (Ylip-HSP90). In our experiments, the orthologs of Hsp90 were all carried by the plasmid so they could be easily shuffled to check whether the observed effects are ortholog specific.

Experimental evolution

For the evolution experiment, JYL5001 and JYL1835 were transformed with HindIII-linearized GFP (pGS62) and DsRED (pGS64) integration plasmid DNA [64] to generate green and red fluorescent protein-labeled ancestral strains. We mixed the two colored subpopulations of Ylip-HSP90 or Scer-HSC82 cells in an approximate ratio of 1:1 to establish starting cultures and then divided them into 12 evolving and 12 control lines. These cell lines were grown in YPD medium at 28°C through a daily 1,000-fold dilution (about 10 generations) with an effective population size of 4.69 × 105 cells on the first 140 days and 2.79 × 106 cells after day 140. The effective population size was estimated using the formula, Ne = N0 × g, in which N0 is the initial population size and g is the number of generations during a single cycle of growth [65]. We tracked the proportion of the green and red subpopulations in each lineage using the BD LSR II system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Fixation of the evolved culture is defined when either the green or red subpopulation reaches a population frequency of 95%.

Cell fitness assays

For the fitness spot assay on plates, around 103 cells were taken from overnight cell cultures growing in YPD at 28°C and spotted onto the plates following 10-fold serial dilutions. Plates were then incubated at specified temperatures until individual colonies became visible. Colony size and cell density were used to estimate the cell fitness and survival rate for each condition. For the fitness assay in liquid, overnight cell cultures growing in YPD at 28°C were inoculated into 120 μL fresh medium in 96-well tissue culture plates at an initial concentration of 0.1 OD595, and cell densities (OD595) were measured every 10 minutes using Infinite 200 series plate readers (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland) with a shaking cycle (1 minute shaking and 3 minutes standing) until the culture reached diauxic shift. Growth rates (OD595/hour) of the sample were calculated using the 10-point sliding window, and the maximal growth rate was used to represent the fitness value. Fitness improvement compared with ancestors was calculated as (Fx/Fa−1) × 100%, where Fx is the fitness value of evolved or reconstituted clones and Fa is the fitness value of the ancestral strain.

In order to uncover the functional differentiation between Hsp90 orthologs, the ortholog-replacement strains were examined under YPD at 28°C and 16 other conditions, including 0.015% or 0.03% H2O2, 150 mM MgCl2, 50 μM CH3COOH, 0.3 μM tunicamycin (cat. no. T7765, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 5 mM guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl), pH 5 or pH 9, 1 μg/mL doxycycline (cat. no. D9891, Sigma-Aldrich), 0.5 or 1 M NaCl, 0.2 M LiCl, 16°C, 34°C, or 37°C, and 1.8 M sorbitol. Chemicals were added into YPD to prepare media for specific conditions. Liquid fitness assays were used in all measurements.

To characterize the evolved phenotypes, we measured the fitness of evolved clones under nine different stress conditions: AZC (cat. no. A0760, Sigma-Aldrich), a proline analog that can be incorporated into newly synthesized proteins and cause failure in folding or structural instability [66, 67]; cycloheximide (CYH, cat. no. C7698, Sigma-Aldrich), which inhibits the 80S ribosome from translating mRNA into proteins [68]; BFA (cat. no. B6542, Sigma-Aldrich), which blocks protein trafficking and affects the central vacuolar secretory pathway, resulting in ER/Golgi membrane mixing [69] and an unfolded protein response [70]; high temperature (37°C) and ethanol (EtOH), which induce protein misfolding and change the membrane protein composition [71]; doxycycline, which reduces the expression level of Hsp90 orthologs; GuHCl, which inhibits the disaggregase activity of Hsp104 and reduces cell thermotolerance [72]; MG132 (cat. no. C2211, Sigma-Aldrich), a compound that inhibits protein degradation by blocking proteasome activity [73]; and macbecin II (MacII, cat. no. NSC 330500, NIH, Bethesda, MD), which is a compound that inhibits the ATPase activity of Hsp90. CSM at 28°C was a suboptimal condition. Apart from CSM, as well as MG132 that was added to synthetic medium (0.17% yeast nitrogen base without ammonium sulfate supplemented with 0.1% proline, amino acids, 2% glucose, and 0.003% SDS) [74], all these chemicals were added into YPD medium. Liquid fitness assays were used in all measurements.

Western blotting for measuring the abundance of Hsp90

We constructed pRS413-pTetO7-TAP-Scer-HSC82 and pRS413-pTetO7-TAP-Ylip-HSP90 plasmids, in which a tandem affinity purification (TAP) tag was fused to the N-terminus of the Hsp90 protein. These plasmids were then transformed into corresponding ancestral or evolved clones. Cell pellets were collected by centrifugation, washed once with ddH2O, and lysed using the NaOH-lysis method [75]. The anti-TAP-tag antibody (cat. no. CAB1001, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used to detect TAP-Scer-Hsc82 or TAP-Ylip-Hsp90 proteins, and the anti-G6PDH antibody (cat. no. A9521, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to detect the G6PDH protein as the internal control.

V-src kinase assay

Ancestral Scer-HSC82 and Ylip-HSP90 strains were first transformed with the plasmid Y316v-srcv5 containing v-src with a C-terminal V5 tag under a galactose-regulated promoter [76]. Cells were then maintained on 2% glucose CSM-Ura plates to prevent the expression of v-src. Before the experiment, cells were grown to log phase in 2% glucose CSM-Ura liquid cultures, transferred to 2% raffinose CSM-Ura, and then grown to about 5 × 106 cells/mL. Cells were pelleted, resuspended in 2% galactose CSM-Ura, and grown for 6 hours to induce the expression of v-src. The whole experiment was carried out at 28°C. Cell pellets were collected by centrifugation, washed once with water, and lysed with the NaOH-lysis method. Total protein extracts were mixed with the sample buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.004% bromophenol blue, and 2% 2-Mercaptoethanol) and boiled at 100°C for 5 minutes. The anti-phospho-tyrosine antibody 4G10 (cat. no. 05–321, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA) was used to detect phosphorylated tyrosine residues, and the anti-V5-Tag antibody (cat. no. MCA1360, BioRad, Hercules, CA) was used to detect the v-src protein.

Flow cytometry of DNA content

Flow cytometry was used to determine the DNA content of ancestral and evolved cells. Total 5 × 106 log-phase cells were harvested, resuspended in ice-cold fixation buffer (40% ethanol, 0.1 M sorbitol, and 5 mM EDTA), and then kept at −20°C overnight. The fixed cells were then washed twice with 1 mL ddH2O and then washed with 1 mL PBS + 0.5% Triton X-100. After washing, the cells were treated with 0.5 mL 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) with 150 μg/mL RNase A and incubated at 37°C for 16–18 hours. SYTOX Green nucleic acid stain (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 38 mM sodium citrate were mixed in a 1:800 ratio, and 300 μL of the mixture was added into the cell solution. The stained cells were diluted into 1 mL 0.1 M EDTA and sonicated for at least 3 minutes prior to flow cytometry. A total of 10,000 cells were scored for DNA content using the BD FACScan system (Becton Dickinson). The E10 clone was excluded from further examination because of its altered ploidy.

Hsp104 aggregation assay

A blue fluorescence protein (BFP) cassette was amplified from the pFA6a-link-yomTagBFP2-Kan plasmid and integrated into the genome to generate an Hsp104-BFP fusion protein in all tested strains [77]. Log-phase cells growing in YPD at 25°C were transferred to a 37°C water bath and cells were collected at 0, 1, 2, and 3 hours after the temperature shift. The samples were resuspended in 200 μL PBS and transferred to a Glass Bottom ViewPlate-96F (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) that was precoated with concanavalin A (cat. no. C2010, Sigma-Aldrich). Images of Hsp104-BFP foci were acquired using an ImageXpress Micro XL system (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA) and analyzed using a custom-built module under MetaXpress High-Content Image Acquisition and Analysis Software (Molecular Devices).

Cell morphology assay

Log-phase cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS, and cell walls were stained with either 25 μg/mL NHS-Rhodamine (E3, E5, E7, E8, E9, green Ylip-HSP90, and Scer-HSC82 ancestors) or NHS-Fluorescein (E4, E6, E11, and red Ylip-HSP90 and Scer-HSC82 ancestors) (Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 8 minutes in the PBS buffer with 0.1 M NaHCO3 and 5 mM EDTA. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and sonicated for 3 minutes before 2 × 104 cells were transferred to a Glass Bottom ViewPlate-96F for image acquisition. We used Calmorph to calculate the ratio of the long versus short axes of yeast cells (http://scmd.gi.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/datamine/calmorph/) [78].

Hierarchical clustering and PCA

For hierarchical clustering, we divided individual fitness values by the mean of all fitness values for the same stress condition to normalize fitness data to a similar scale between conditions. We applied a hierarchical clustering method in R (v3.4.0) [79] to group the evolved Ylip-Hsp90-hosting clones according to their fitness similarity between different conditions. The strain and condition dendrograms were constructed with the hclust function and the heatmap was drawn with the heatmap.2 function in the gplots R package [80]. For PCA, fitness values were used directly, i.e., without normalization, and the prcomp function in R was used to conduct the analysis.

Calculation of Pearson correlation distances

We used the growth rates of all evolved Scer-HSC82 and Ylip-HSP90 clones to conduct pairwise Pearson correlations between each condition. The Pearson correlation distance (d = 1 − Pearson’s correlation coefficient) is used to represent the phenotypic distance between each pair of conditions. A large d means the fitness distributions of evolved clones have very different patterns in two conditions. We used the fviz_dist function of the factoextra package in R to draw the heatmap [81].

Whole genome sequencing analysis

Yeast genomic DNA was isolated using the previously described phenol/chloroform method with one more run of 200 μL of PCIA resuspension and 95% ethanol precipitation to remove the residual RNase A [82]. Isolated genomic DNA was fragmented using a Covaris microTUBE M220 Focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris, Worburn, MA) and DNA libraries were prepared using a TruSeq DNA PCR-Free HT Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Ancestral and each evolved Ylip-HSP90 clone was sequenced to an average depth of 100-fold coverage with a rapid-mode Illumina HiSeq 2500 system (250 bp paired-end reads) and the spore pools were sequenced to an average depth of 200-fold coverage with the NextSeq 500 system (150 bp paired-end reads).

For single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, raw reads were mapped, and SNPs with coverage greater than 20-fold and a frequency higher than 35 (for the segregant analysis, the allele frequency threshold was lowered to 10 to include more low-frequency evolved mutations) were called using CLC bio software (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Evolved mutations were manually identified by comparing the mutation lists between evolved and ancestral Ylip-HSP90 clones, and poor-quality SNPs were excluded after manual checking using the Integrative Genome Viewer [83]. Two kinds of mutations were further excluded from our evolved mutation list (S4 Table): double-called SNPs due to overlap between two open reading frames, and SNPs (grx3-A196V, hop1-K510fs, isu1-I100V, and rsf2-C966G) shared by multiple evolved clones that were likely to be pre-existing SNPs in the ancestral population.

For copy number variation (CNV) analysis, raw reads were mapped via BWA-MEM and CNVs were analyzed via the SAMtools program [84]. The copy number of each gene was calculated by normalizing gene coverage by the median of whole genome coverage derived from the SAMtools bedcov module. Genes with copy number variation greater than 0.8 compared with the ancestral strain were selected and the fold-change is provided in S7 Table.

F1 segregant analysis

E4, E5, and E7 clones were backcrossed to the ancestral strain and the diploids were sporulated. Tetrads were dissected and only spores from four-viable spore tetrads were used. The fitness of F1 haploid progeny was examined under the following conditions: YPD at 28°C, YPD at 37°C, and YPD + GuHCl at 28°C. The latter two conditions were included because they had a better resolution to separate the ancestral and evolved phenotypes. F1 haploid progenies with fitness similar to the evolved or ancestral clones were assigned into good or bad spore pools, respectively. A maximum of one good and one bad spore was selected from a single tetrad. If all four progeny from a single tetrad had fitness that deviated from the evolved and ancestral strains, then none were selected. Individual E7 spores behaved similarly under the high temperature and GuHCl conditions (r = 0.851, Pearson correlation). When cells behaved differently under two conditions, we used the more prominent phenotype of the evolved clone to select the spores (i.e., fitness at 37°C for E4 and fitness in GuHCl-containing medium for E5). We picked 5–20 spores for each pool and employed Illumina sequencing to examine the mutant allele frequency (S9 Table).

The two frequency thresholds used to select the mutations with strong effects were determined based on computational simulations following the previous method [85]. The 90%, 95%, and 99% percentiles of 10,000 times of simulations with the coverage of 200 and pool size N = 5, 9, 10, 18, and 21 were listed in S10 Table. We selected the threshold frequency that approximated to N = 9 as the general criteria for all three analyzed evolved clones.

Gene ontology enrichment and network analysis

The genes containing protein sequence mutations from all evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) analysis using Yeast GO-Slim Process embedded in Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD: https://www.yeastgenome.org/). GO categories with only one gene were excluded. Enrichment scores (Table 1 and S8 Table) were calculated by dividing the proportion of mutated genes classified into the indicated category by the proportion of those in the genome background. Significance of enrichment was analyzed using hypergeometric test (phyper module) in R [79], and p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini Hochberg method [86]. We excluded genes with uncharacterized function or dubious open reading frames, including YLR345W, YEL034C-A, YMR102C, YLR419W, YOL166C, and Q0182.

To understand the functional relationship between the mutated genes and Hsp90, we constructed the functional network between them. The genetic and physical interactions of Hsp90 were first constructed using STRING’s website (https://string-db.org/), and then each interacting pair was confirmed using the information from the SGD (https://www.yeastgenome.org/). We manually incorporated the up- and down-regulated protein-level data from a proteomics analysis [17] to make the regulatory network more complete. Gene functional groups shown in Fig 5 were derived from enriched GO categories and gene-specific description in SGD. The interaction network was constructed with both S. cerevisiae Hsp90 coding genes and all genes that contain protein-sequence-changing mutations in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones using the cytoscape software [87].

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutant reconstitution

Evolved mutations were reconstituted in the ancestral shuffling strain carrying the pRS415-pTetO7-Ylip-HSP90 plasmid (S12 Table). The CRISPR-Cas9 system was modified from previous methods [88, 89]. The guide RNA expression plasmid pRS426-gRNA-AB was modified from pRS426-gRNA.CAN1.Y [88], with BamHI and EcoRI cutting sites added to both sides of the gRNA sequence.

pRS426-gRNA-AB was linearized by BamHI and EcoRI digestion. Guide RNA was amplified by two-fragment fusion PCR using four primers: IgRNAAB-F, target gene gRNA-R, target gene gRNA-F, and IgRNAAB-R (S12 Table). Donor DNA sequences were around 300–600 bp in length and were PCR amplified from the evolved clones. The original plasmid carrying the high-specificity Cas9 nuclease, eSpCas9 (1.1) [90], was obtained from Addgene (plasmid number 71814, Cambridge, MA) and the Cas9 nuclease was further subcloned into the yeast pRS414 vector in our lab. MDM12 and BRE5 mutations were constructed using the wild-type Cas9 nuclease from Dr. George Church’s group [88]. CRISPR-Cas9-reconstituted clones were screened by PCR with either Donor F or R primer and an allele-specific primer that has the mutation site at the last position of the 3′ end and a mismatched nucleotide at the third last position to decrease the tendency of nonspecific annealing [91]. Fitness data were obtained by measuring at least three independent CRISPR-reconstituted clones.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Expression of Ylip-HSP90 increases hypersaline tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells.

(A) Growth rates of different replacement strains. Ncas-HSP90 and Klac-HSP90 replacement strains exhibited similar fitness to the Scer-HSC82 strain under most conditions. In contrast, Ylip-HSP90 replacement strains showed reduced fitness compared to the Scer-HSC82 strain under most tested conditions but similar fitness in media containing 150 mM MgCl2, 1.8 M sorbitol, or 0.5 M NaCl. Unless specified otherwise, cells were grown at 28°C. Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by plate readers. p-values were calculated by two-tailed Student t test with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001. Data sets did not deviate from the normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 4. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. See also S1 Table. Klac, Kluyveromyces lactis; Ncas, Naumovozyma castellii; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S2 Fig. The phenotypic differences between Ylip-Hsp90– and Scer-Hsc82–carrying cells are not due to differences in the expression level or activity of these two orthologs.

(A) The protein levels of Scer-Hsc82 and Ylip-Hsp90 are not significantly different between the ancestral Scer-HSC82 and Ylip-HSP90 strains (p = 0.071, z = −1.807, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Total cell protein was extracted and examined by western blot. The Hsp90 protein was N-terminally fused with a TAP tag and detected by the anti-TAP antibody. G6PDH was used as the internal control. The TAP-Hsp90/G6PDH ratios were normalized to that of the Scer-HSC82 strain, and the bottom panel shows quantitative data of the western blot. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 3. (B) Scer-Hsc82 and Ylip-Hsp90 exhibit similar v-src folding activities (p = 0.827, z = −0.218, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Log-phase cells were grown in galactose-containing medium for 6 hours to induce the expression of v-src. The same amount of total cell protein was loaded for each sample and examined by western blot. The phospho-tyrosine and v-src were detected by anti-phospho-tyrosine and anti-v-src antibodies, respectively. The phospho-tyrosine/v-src ratios were normalized to that of the Scer-HSC82 strain, and the right panel shows quantitative data of the western blot. Error bar represents the standard error, N = 3. (C) Yarrowia lipolytica cells have higher fitness than Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in hypersaline conditions. Serially diluted cell cultures were spotted onto plates containing 1 M NaCl or 0.2 M LiCl and incubated at 25°C until colonies became visible. The numerical data used in panels (A, B) are included in S1 Data. G6PDH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; TAP, Tandem affinity purification; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S3 Fig. The frequency dynamics of each evolved line.

Two isogenic subpopulations labeled with red or green fluorescence protein were mixed in an approximately 1:1 ratio in the initial cultures and allowed to evolve in YPD at 28°C. The subpopulation that obtained a beneficial mutation would start expanding its frequency in the evolved culture. The proportions of subpopulations were monitored using flow cytometry. The y-axis shows the green subpopulation frequency and the x-axis shows the numbers of evolved generations. The control line con6 and evolving lines evo1, evo2, and evo12 were excluded because of culture contamination during evolution. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. YPD, Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose.

(EPS)

S4 Fig. The ploidy and Ylip-HSP90 protein expression levels of evolved clones.

(A) Evolved Scer-HSC82 clones all became diploid or triploid, but most of the evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones remained haploid. All ancestral strains were confirmed to be haploid by flow cytometry. (B) Diploid Ylip-HSP90–carrying cells exhibit lower fitness than haploid Ylip-HSP90–carrying cells (p = 0.003, z = 2.744, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test), while diploid and haploid Scer-HSC82–carrying cells show similar fitness. Cells were grown in liquid cultures, and growth rates were measured by plate readers. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 4. (C) The protein level of Ylip-Hsp90 in the evolved clones is not significantly different from that of the ancestral strains (two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). G and R indicate the ancestral strains carrying the green and red fluorescent proteins, respectively. Total cell protein was extracted and examined by western blot. The Hsp90 protein was N-terminally fused with a TAP tag and detected by the anti-TAP antibody. G6PDH was used as the internal control. The TAP-Hsp90/G6PDH ratios were all normalized to that of the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strains, and the bottom panel shows quantitative data of the western blot. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 3. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. G6PDH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; TAP, Tandem affinity purification; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S5 Fig. Representative microscope images of cells containing Hsp104-BFP foci and measurement of cell morphology.

(A) After cells were treated at 37°C for 3 hours, images of Hsp104-BFP foci were acquired and analyzed using a custom-built module under the MetaXpress High-Content Image Acquisition and Analysis Software. (B) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones show different levels of protein homeostasis restoration. Cells carrying Hsp104-BFP were grown at 25°C and then shifted to 37°C to induce heat adaptation. The fraction of cells containing Hsp104-BFP foci was counted at 0, 1, 2, and 3 hours after the temperature shift. The same data used in Fig 3C were used to plot this figure. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 7. (C) After labeling the cell wall with the fluorescent dye (green circles), the ratio of the long versus short axes (yellow lines) of yeast cells was calculated by Calmorph. The numerical data used in panel (B) are included in S1 Data. BFP, blue fluorescent protein; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S6 Fig. The evolved phenotypes of Ylip-HSP90 clones are more divergent than those of Scer-HSC82 clones.

(A) PCA analysis of the fitness values shows that all Ylip-HSP90 clones evolved diverged phenotypes, scattered across the four principal component dimensions. Explanatory power is shown in brackets next to each principal component. (B) Fitness improvements of the evolved Scer-HSC82 clones under 11 different growth conditions. Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by plate readers. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 2. Drug abbreviations are the same as Fig 4A. Fitness improvement was calculated by comparing the fitness of the evolved clone to that of the ancestral Scer-HSC82 strain. (C) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones responded to various stress conditions more differently than evolved Scer-HSC82 clones. The variance of fitness improvements of evolved Scer-HSC82 or Ylip-HSP90 clones in each condition is plotted. The evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones have significantly greater variances of fitness improvements compared with evolved Scer-HSC82 clones (p = 0.039, one-tailed Student t test). (D) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones have greater Pearson correlation distances between different conditions than evolved Scer-HSC82 clones. The result suggests that evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones generally have different fitness distribution patterns under different conditions, whereas the fitness patterns of evolved Scer-HSC82 clones are similar to each other regardless of the stress types. Pearson correlation distances in all possible pairs of conditions were pooled and compared between evolved Ylip-HSP90 and Scer-HSC82 clones (p = 0.001, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. PC, principal component; PCA, principal component analysis; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S7 Fig. Summary of mutation types and numbers in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones.

The genomes of evolved clones were sequenced using Illumina sequencers, and mutations were identified. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. N, nonsynonymous mutation; S, synonymous mutation; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S8 Fig. Individual mutations have strong effects in different stress condition.

The fitness improvement data of Fig 6A were used to draw this figure. The height of the bar represents the level of fitness improvements in a specific condition. Blue and red colors indicate the positive and negative effects, respectively. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 3. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data.

(EPS)

S1 Table. Fitness measurements of cells carrying different Hsp90 orthologs under 17 growth conditions.

Hsp90, heat shock protein 90.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Fitness measurements of evolved clones under 11 growth conditions.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Correlation tests between the protein abundance of Ylip-Hsp90 and the fitness of evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones in individual conditions.

Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Summary of PCA analysis of the evolved clones.

PCA, principal component analysis.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Pearson correlation distances and p-values.

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Mutation list of evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones.

Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(XLSX)

S7 Table. Copy number variation in evolved clones.

(XLSX)

S8 Table. GO enrichment analysis of the protein-sequence-changing evolved mutations.

GO, gene ontology.

(XLSX)

S9 Table. Fitness measurements of the F1 segregants.

(XLSX)

S10 Table. Allele frequency thresholds from computational simulations and allele frequencies in the F1 segregant pools.

(XLSX)

S11 Table. Fitness measurements of reconstituted mutant strains under 11 growth conditions.

(XLSX)

S12 Table. Strain, guide RNA, and primer lists.

(XLSX)

S1 Data. Excel spreadsheet containing, in separate sheets, the underlying numerical data of Figs 1B, 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 3D, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 6A, 6B, 6C, S1, S3, S5B, S6A, S6D, S8, S2A, S2B, S4A, S4B, S4C, S6B, S6C and S7.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the Leu lab for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. We thank Po-Hsiang Hung, Wen-Sui Lo, and Chih-Horng Kuo for assistance in NGS and mapping analyses and Jiri Koubek for assistance in strain reconstruction. We thank the Sequencing Core of Academia Sinica for sequencing services, the Genomics, Bioinformatics, Imaging, and FACS Cores of IMB for technical assistance, and John O’Brien for manuscript editing. We thank Daniel Bolon, Didier Picard, and Gavin Sherlock for sharing plasmids.

Abbreviations

AZC

azetidine-2-carboxylate

BFA

brefeldin A

BFP

blue fluorescent protein

Cas9

CRISPR-associated protein 9

CRISPR

clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

CSM

complete supplement mixture

GFP

green fluorescent protein

GO

gene ontology

HGT

horizontal gene transfer

Hsp90

heat shock protein 90

Klac

Kluyveromyces lactis

Ncas

Naumovozyma castellii

OD

optical density

PCA

principal component analysis

Scer

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

TetO7

tetracycline operator 7 repeats

Ylip

Yarrowia lipolytica

YPD

Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Whole-genome sequence files are available from the NCBI BioProject database (accession number PRJNA438196).

Funding Statement

Academia Sinica https://www.sinica.edu.tw/en (grant number AS-IA-105-L01). Received by JYL. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology https://www.most.gov.tw/?l=en (grant number 106-2321-B-001-018). Received by JYL. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature. 1999;402(6761 Suppl):C47–52. 10.1038/35011540 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(2):101–13. Epub 2004/01/22. 10.1038/nrg1272 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eisenberg D, Marcotte EM, Xenarios I, Yeates TO. Protein function in the post-genomic era. Nature. 2000;405(6788):823–6. 10.1038/35015694 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Proulx SR, Promislow DE, Phillips PC. Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20(6):345–53. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature. 2001;411(6833):41–2. Epub 2001/05/03. 10.1038/35075138 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Batada NN, Hurst LD, Tyers M. Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006;2(7):e88 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020088 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1500817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levy SF, Siegal ML. Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(11):e264 Epub 2008/11/07. 08-PLBI-RA-0960 [pii] 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060264 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2577700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Powers ET, Balch WE. Diversity in the origins of proteostasis networks—a driver for protein function in evolution. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(4):237–48. 10.1038/nrm3542 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3718298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Borkovich KA, Farrelly FW, Finkelstein DB, Taulien J, Lindquist S. hsp82 is an essential protein that is required in higher concentrations for growth of cells at higher temperatures. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9(9):3919–30. Epub 1989/09/01. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC362454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aligue R, Akhavan-Niak H, Russell P. A role for Hsp90 in cell cycle control: Wee1 tyrosine kinase activity requires interaction with Hsp90. EMBO J. 1994;13(24):6099–106. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC395589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cutforth T, Rubin GM. Mutations in Hsp83 and cdc37 impair signaling by the sevenless receptor tyrosine kinase in Drosophila. Cell. 1994;77(7):1027–36. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Birnby DA, Link EM, Vowels JJ, Tian H, Colacurcio PL, Thomas JH. A transmembrane guanylyl cyclase (DAF-11) and Hsp90 (DAF-21) regulate a common set of chemosensory behaviors in caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2000;155(1):85–104. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1461074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Devaney E, O'Neill K, Harnett W, Whitesell L, Kinnaird JH. Hsp90 is essential in the filarial nematode Brugia pahangi. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(6):627–36. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.01.007 WOS:000229362100005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McClellan AJ, Xia Y, Deutschbauer AM, Davis RW, Gerstein M, Frydman J. Diverse cellular functions of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone uncovered using systems approaches. Cell. 2007;131(1):121–35. Epub 2007/10/10. S0092-8674(07)00974-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.036 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao R, Davey M, Hsu YC, Kaplanek P, Tong A, Parsons AB, et al. Navigating the chaperone network: an integrative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the hsp90 chaperone. Cell. 2005;120(5):715–27. Epub 2005/03/16. S0092-8674(04)01249-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.024 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Taipale M, Jarosz DF, Lindquist S. HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(7):515–28. Epub 2010/06/10. nrm2918 [pii] 10.1038/nrm2918 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gopinath RK, You ST, Chien KY, Swamy KB, Yu JS, Schuyler SC, et al. The Hsp90-dependent proteome is conserved and enriched for hub proteins with high levels of protein-protein connectivity. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(10):2851–65. Epub 2014/10/16. evu226 [pii] 10.1093/gbe/evu226 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4224352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Makhnevych T, Houry WA. The role of Hsp90 in protein complex assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(3):674–82. Epub 2011/09/29. S0167-4889(11)00259-X [pii] 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.09.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chiosis G, Dickey CA, Johnson JL. A global view of Hsp90 functions. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(1):1–4. 10.1038/nsmb.2481 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4004347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim TS, Jang CY, Kim HD, Lee JY, Ahn BY, Kim J. Interaction of Hsp90 with ribosomal proteins protects from ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent degradation. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17(2):824–33. 10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0713 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1356592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pearl LH, Prodromou C. Structure and mechanism of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone machinery. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006;75:271–94. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142738 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rohl A, Rohrberg J, Buchner J. The chaperone Hsp90: changing partners for demanding clients. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013;38(5):253–62. 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.02.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Citri A, Harari D, Shohat G, Ramakrishnan P, Gan J, Lavi S, et al. Hsp90 recognizes a common surface on client kinases. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(20):14361–9. Epub 2006/03/23. M512613200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M512613200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xu W, Yuan X, Xiang Z, Mimnaugh E, Marcu M, Neckers L. Surface charge and hydrophobicity determine ErbB2 binding to the Hsp90 chaperone complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12(2):120–6. Epub 2005/01/12. nsmb885 [pii] 10.1038/nsmb885 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rutherford SL, Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 1998;396(6709):336–42. Epub 1998/12/09. 10.1038/24550 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Queitsch C, Sangster TA, Lindquist S. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature. 2002;417(6889):618–24. Epub 2002/06/07. 10.1038/nature749 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rohner N, Jarosz DF, Kowalko JE, Yoshizawa M, Jeffery WR, Borowsky RL, et al. Cryptic variation in morphological evolution: HSP90 as a capacitor for loss of eyes in cavefish. Science. 2013;342(6164):1372–5. Epub 2013/12/18. 342/6164/1372 [pii] 10.1126/science.1240276 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4004346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hsieh YY, Hung PH, Leu JY. Hsp90 regulates nongenetic variation in response to environmental stress. Mol Cell. 2013;50(1):82–92. Epub 2013/02/26. S1097-2765(13)00090-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.026 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jarosz DF, Taipale M, Lindquist S. Protein homeostasis and the phenotypic manifestation of genetic diversity: principles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:189–216. Epub 2010/11/05. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090412 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Galagan JE, Henn MR, Ma LJ, Cuomo CA, Birren B. Genomics of the fungal kingdom: insights into eukaryotic biology. Genome Res. 2005;15(12):1620–31. Epub 2005/12/13. 15/12/1620 [pii] 10.1101/gr.3767105 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Taylor JW, Berbee ML. Dating divergences in the Fungal Tree of Life: review and new analyses. Mycologia. 2006;98(6):838–49. Epub 2007/05/10. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu Y, Lindquist S. Heat-shock protein hsp90 governs the activity of pp60v-src kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(15):7074–8. Epub 1993/08/01. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC47078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Praphailong W, Fleet GH. The effect of pH, sodium chloride, sucrose, sorbate and benzoate on the growth of food spoilage yeasts. Food Microbiol. 1997;14(5):459–68. 10.1006/fmic.1997.0106 WOS:A1997YC49800008. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Duquesne S, Bordes F, Fudalej F, Nicaud JM, Marty A. The yeast Yarrowia lipolytica as a generic tool for molecular evolution of enzymes. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;861:301–12. 10.1007/978-1-61779-600-5_18 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Imai J, Yahara I. Role of HSP90 in salt stress tolerance via stabilization and regulation of calcineurin. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(24):9262–70. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC102183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gerstein AC, Chun HJ, Grant A, Otto SP. Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(9):e145 Epub 2006/09/28. 06-PLGE-RA-0195R2 [pii] 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020145 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1570378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Oromendia AB, Dodgson SE, Amon A. Aneuploidy causes proteotoxic stress in yeast. Genes Dev. 2012;26(24):2696–708. Epub 2012/12/12. gad.207407.112 [pii] 10.1101/gad.207407.112 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3533075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lang GI, Murray AW. Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2008;178(1):67–82. 10.1534/genetics.107.071506 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G. Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(4):e1002056 Epub 2011/05/10. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002056 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3084205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Leach MD, Klipp E, Cowen LE, Brown AJP. Fungal Hsp90: a biological transistor that tunes cellular outputs to thermal inputs. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2012;10(10):693–704. 10.1038/nrmicro2875 ISI:000309057900012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D535–9. Epub 2005/12/31. 34/suppl_1/D535 [pii] 10.1093/nar/gkj109 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1347471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Raman K, Wagner A. Evolvability and robustness in a complex signalling circuit. Mol Biosyst. 2011;7(4):1081–92. 10.1039/c0mb00165a . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kirschner M, Gerhart J. Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(15):8420–7. Epub 1998/07/22. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC33871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ronshaugen M, McGinnis N, McGinnis W. Hox protein mutation and macroevolution of the insect body plan. Nature. 2002;415(6874):914–7. 10.1038/nature716 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rebeiz M, Patel NH, Hinman VF. Unraveling the Tangled Skein: The Evolution of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Development. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:103–31. 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153423 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lynch VJ, Wagner GP. Resurrecting the role of transcription factor change in developmental evolution. Evolution. 2008;62(9):2131–54. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00440.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Maheshwari S, Barbash DA. The genetics of hybrid incompatibilities. Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45:331–55. Epub 2011/09/14. 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132514 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Genest O, Reidy M, Street TO, Hoskins JR, Camberg JL, Agard DA, et al. Uncovering a Region of Heat Shock Protein 90 Important for Client Binding in E. coli and Chaperone Function in Yeast. Molecular Cell. 2013;49(3):464–73. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.017 WOS:000314792500010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rajon E, Masel J. Compensatory evolution and the origins of innovations. Genetics. 2013;193(4):1209–20. 10.1534/genetics.112.148627 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3606098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Huang JL. Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes: The weak-link model. Bioessays. 2013;35(10):868–75. 10.1002/bies.201300007 WOS:000327868600007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Husnik F, McCutcheon JP. Functional horizontal gene transfer from bacteria to eukaryotes. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2018;16(2):67–79. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.137 WOS:000422624500006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bergman A, Siegal ML. Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature. 2003;424(6948):549–52. 10.1038/nature01765 ISI:000184454700042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ferrer M, Chernikova TN, Yakimov MM, Golyshin PN, Timmis KN. Chaperonins govern growth of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Nature Biotechnology. 2003;21(11):1266–7. 10.1038/nbt1103-1266 WOS:000186320000012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lind PA, Tobin C, Berg OG, Kurland CG, Andersson DI. Compensatory gene amplification restores fitness after inter-species gene replacements. Mol Microbiol. 2010;75(5):1078–89. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07030.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kacar B, Garmendia E, Tuncbag N, Andersson DI, Hughes D. Functional Constraints on Replacing an Essential Gene with Its Ancient and Modern Homologs. MBio. 2017;8(4). 10.1128/mBio.01276-17 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5574714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kacar B, Ge X, Sanyal S, Gaucher EA. Experimental Evolution of Escherichia coli Harboring an Ancient Translation Protein. J Mol Evol. 2017;84(2–3):69–84. 10.1007/s00239-017-9781-0 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5371648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pavlicev M, Wagner GP. A model of developmental evolution: selection, pleiotropy and compensation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012;27(6):316–22. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dalal CK, Johnson AD. How transcription circuits explore alternative architectures while maintaining overall circuit output. Gene Dev. 2017;31(14):1397–405. 10.1101/gad.303362.117 WOS:000408744100001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wagner GP, Lynch VJ. The gene regulatory logic of transcription factor evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23(7):377–85. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lenski RE, Ofria C, Pennock RT, Adami C. The evolutionary origin of complex features. Nature. 2003;423(6936):139–44. 10.1038/nature01568 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Covert AW 3rd, Lenski RE, Wilke CO, Ofria C. Experiments on the role of deleterious mutations as stepping stones in adaptive evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(34):E3171–8. 10.1073/pnas.1313424110 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3752215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hughes TR, Marton MJ, Jones AR, Roberts CJ, Stoughton R, Armour CD, et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell. 2000;102(1):109–26. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mnaimneh S, Davierwala AP, Haynes J, Moffat J, Peng WT, Zhang W, et al. Exploration of essential gene functions via titratable promoter alleles. Cell. 2004;118(1):31–44. Epub 2004/07/10. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.013 S0092867404005811 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kao KC, Sherlock G. Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet. 2008;40(12):1499–504. 10.1038/ng.280 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Tadler SC. Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia-Coli. 1. Adaptation and Divergence during 2,000 Generations. American Naturalist. 1991;138(6):1315–41. 10.1086/285289 WOS:A1991HB55000001. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Trotter EW, Berenfeld L, Krause SA, Petsko GA, Gray JV. Protein misfolding and temperature up-shift cause G1 arrest via a common mechanism dependent on heat shock factor in Saccharomycescerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(13):7313–8. 10.1073/pnas.121172998 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC34665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Trotter EW, Kao CM, Berenfeld L, Botstein D, Petsko GA, Gray JV. Misfolded proteins are competent to mediate a subset of the responses to heat shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(47):44817–25. 10.1074/jbc.M204686200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Obrig TG, Culp WJ, Mckeehan WL, Hardesty B. Mechanism by Which Cycloheximide and Related Glutarimide Antibiotics Inhibit Peptide Synthesis on Reticulocyte Ribosomes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1971;246(1):174–81. WOS:A1971I324100022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lippincott-Schwartz J, Yuan L, Tipper C, Amherdt M, Orci L, Klausner RD. Brefeldin A's effects on endosomes, lysosomes, and the TGN suggest a general mechanism for regulating organelle structure and membrane traffic. Cell. 1991;67(3):601–16. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Samali A, Fitzgerald U, Deegan S, Gupta S. Methods for monitoring endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response. Int J Cell Biol. 2010;2010:830307 10.1155/2010/830307 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2821749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Piper PW. The heat shock and ethanol stress responses of yeast exhibit extensive similarity and functional overlap. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;134(2–3):121–7. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Grimminger V, Richter K, Imhof A, Buchner J, Walter S. The prion curing agent guanidinium chloride specifically inhibits ATP hydrolysis by Hsp104. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(9):7378–83. 10.1074/jbc.M312403200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gaczynska M, Osmulski PA. Small-molecule inhibitors of proteasome activity. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;301:3–22. 10.1385/1-59259-895-1:003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Liu C, Apodaca J, Davis LE, Rao H. Proteasome inhibition in wild-type yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Biotechniques. 2007;42(2):158, 60, 62. 10.2144/000112389 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kushnirov VV. Rapid and reliable protein extraction from yeast. Yeast. 2000;16(9):857–60. Epub 2000/06/22. 10.1002/1097-0061(20000630)16:9<857::AID-YEA561>3.0.CO;2-B [pii] 10.1002/1097-0061(20000630)16:9<857::AID-YEA561>3.0.CO;2-B. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wayne N, Bolon DN. Dimerization of Hsp90 is required for in vivo function: Design and analysis of monomers and dimers. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282(48):35386–95. 10.1074/jbc.M703844200 WOS:000251155200081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lee S, Lim WA, Thorn KS. Improved blue, green, and red fluorescent protein tagging vectors for S. cerevisiae. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e67902 10.1371/journal.pone.0067902 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3699464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ohya Y, Sese J, Yukawa M, Sano F, Nakatani Y, Saito TL, et al. High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(52):19015–20. Epub 2005/12/21. 0509436102 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0509436102 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1316885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Liaw WHA, Lumley T, et al. gplots: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data. R package version 3.0.1. ed2016.
  • 81.Kassambara A, Mundt F. factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R package version 1.0.5. ed2017.
  • 82.Hsu PC, Yang CY, Lan CY. Candida albicans Hap43 Is a Repressor Induced under Low-Iron Conditions and Is Essential for Iron-Responsive Transcriptional Regulation and Virulence. Eukaryotic Cell. 2011;10(2):207–25. 10.1128/EC.00158-10 WOS:000286981300007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Thorvaldsdottir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2013;14(2):178–92. 10.1093/bib/bbs017 WOS:000316694700006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2723002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Takagi H, Abe A, Yoshida K, Kosugi S, Natsume S, Mitsuoka C, et al. QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 2013;74(1):174–83. 10.1111/tpj.12105 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate—a Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met. 1995;57(1):289–300. WOS:A1995QE45300017. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Su G, Morris JH, Demchak B, Bader GD. Biological network exploration with Cytoscape 3. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2014;47:8 13 1–24. 10.1002/0471250953.bi0813s47 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4174321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(7):4336–43. 10.1093/nar/gkt135 WOS:000318167900046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Horwitz AA, Walter JM, Schubert MG, Kung SH, Hawkins K, Platt DM, et al. Efficient Multiplexed Integration of Synergistic Alleles and Metabolic Pathways in Yeasts via CRISPR-Cas. Cell Syst. 2015;1(1):88–96. 10.1016/j.cels.2015.02.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Slaymaker IM, Gao L, Zetsche B, Scott DA, Yan WX, Zhang F. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science. 2016;351(6268):84–8. 10.1126/science.aad5227 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4714946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hirotsu N, Murakami N, Kashiwagi T, Ujiie K, Ishimaru K. Protocol: a simple gel-free method for SNP genotyping using allele-specific primers in rice and other plant species. Plant Methods. 2010;6. Artn 12 10.1186/1746-4811-6-12. WOS:000278325500001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Expression of Ylip-HSP90 increases hypersaline tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells.

(A) Growth rates of different replacement strains. Ncas-HSP90 and Klac-HSP90 replacement strains exhibited similar fitness to the Scer-HSC82 strain under most conditions. In contrast, Ylip-HSP90 replacement strains showed reduced fitness compared to the Scer-HSC82 strain under most tested conditions but similar fitness in media containing 150 mM MgCl2, 1.8 M sorbitol, or 0.5 M NaCl. Unless specified otherwise, cells were grown at 28°C. Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by plate readers. p-values were calculated by two-tailed Student t test with the Benjamini-Hochberg correction. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001. Data sets did not deviate from the normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 4. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. See also S1 Table. Klac, Kluyveromyces lactis; Ncas, Naumovozyma castellii; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S2 Fig. The phenotypic differences between Ylip-Hsp90– and Scer-Hsc82–carrying cells are not due to differences in the expression level or activity of these two orthologs.

(A) The protein levels of Scer-Hsc82 and Ylip-Hsp90 are not significantly different between the ancestral Scer-HSC82 and Ylip-HSP90 strains (p = 0.071, z = −1.807, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Total cell protein was extracted and examined by western blot. The Hsp90 protein was N-terminally fused with a TAP tag and detected by the anti-TAP antibody. G6PDH was used as the internal control. The TAP-Hsp90/G6PDH ratios were normalized to that of the Scer-HSC82 strain, and the bottom panel shows quantitative data of the western blot. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 3. (B) Scer-Hsc82 and Ylip-Hsp90 exhibit similar v-src folding activities (p = 0.827, z = −0.218, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Log-phase cells were grown in galactose-containing medium for 6 hours to induce the expression of v-src. The same amount of total cell protein was loaded for each sample and examined by western blot. The phospho-tyrosine and v-src were detected by anti-phospho-tyrosine and anti-v-src antibodies, respectively. The phospho-tyrosine/v-src ratios were normalized to that of the Scer-HSC82 strain, and the right panel shows quantitative data of the western blot. Error bar represents the standard error, N = 3. (C) Yarrowia lipolytica cells have higher fitness than Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in hypersaline conditions. Serially diluted cell cultures were spotted onto plates containing 1 M NaCl or 0.2 M LiCl and incubated at 25°C until colonies became visible. The numerical data used in panels (A, B) are included in S1 Data. G6PDH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; TAP, Tandem affinity purification; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S3 Fig. The frequency dynamics of each evolved line.

Two isogenic subpopulations labeled with red or green fluorescence protein were mixed in an approximately 1:1 ratio in the initial cultures and allowed to evolve in YPD at 28°C. The subpopulation that obtained a beneficial mutation would start expanding its frequency in the evolved culture. The proportions of subpopulations were monitored using flow cytometry. The y-axis shows the green subpopulation frequency and the x-axis shows the numbers of evolved generations. The control line con6 and evolving lines evo1, evo2, and evo12 were excluded because of culture contamination during evolution. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. YPD, Yeast extract-Peptone-Dextrose.

(EPS)

S4 Fig. The ploidy and Ylip-HSP90 protein expression levels of evolved clones.

(A) Evolved Scer-HSC82 clones all became diploid or triploid, but most of the evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones remained haploid. All ancestral strains were confirmed to be haploid by flow cytometry. (B) Diploid Ylip-HSP90–carrying cells exhibit lower fitness than haploid Ylip-HSP90–carrying cells (p = 0.003, z = 2.744, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test), while diploid and haploid Scer-HSC82–carrying cells show similar fitness. Cells were grown in liquid cultures, and growth rates were measured by plate readers. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 4. (C) The protein level of Ylip-Hsp90 in the evolved clones is not significantly different from that of the ancestral strains (two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). G and R indicate the ancestral strains carrying the green and red fluorescent proteins, respectively. Total cell protein was extracted and examined by western blot. The Hsp90 protein was N-terminally fused with a TAP tag and detected by the anti-TAP antibody. G6PDH was used as the internal control. The TAP-Hsp90/G6PDH ratios were all normalized to that of the ancestral Ylip-HSP90 strains, and the bottom panel shows quantitative data of the western blot. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 3. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. G6PDH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; TAP, Tandem affinity purification; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S5 Fig. Representative microscope images of cells containing Hsp104-BFP foci and measurement of cell morphology.

(A) After cells were treated at 37°C for 3 hours, images of Hsp104-BFP foci were acquired and analyzed using a custom-built module under the MetaXpress High-Content Image Acquisition and Analysis Software. (B) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones show different levels of protein homeostasis restoration. Cells carrying Hsp104-BFP were grown at 25°C and then shifted to 37°C to induce heat adaptation. The fraction of cells containing Hsp104-BFP foci was counted at 0, 1, 2, and 3 hours after the temperature shift. The same data used in Fig 3C were used to plot this figure. Error bar represents the standard error, N ≥ 7. (C) After labeling the cell wall with the fluorescent dye (green circles), the ratio of the long versus short axes (yellow lines) of yeast cells was calculated by Calmorph. The numerical data used in panel (B) are included in S1 Data. BFP, blue fluorescent protein; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S6 Fig. The evolved phenotypes of Ylip-HSP90 clones are more divergent than those of Scer-HSC82 clones.

(A) PCA analysis of the fitness values shows that all Ylip-HSP90 clones evolved diverged phenotypes, scattered across the four principal component dimensions. Explanatory power is shown in brackets next to each principal component. (B) Fitness improvements of the evolved Scer-HSC82 clones under 11 different growth conditions. Cells were grown in liquid cultures and growth rates were measured by plate readers. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 2. Drug abbreviations are the same as Fig 4A. Fitness improvement was calculated by comparing the fitness of the evolved clone to that of the ancestral Scer-HSC82 strain. (C) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones responded to various stress conditions more differently than evolved Scer-HSC82 clones. The variance of fitness improvements of evolved Scer-HSC82 or Ylip-HSP90 clones in each condition is plotted. The evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones have significantly greater variances of fitness improvements compared with evolved Scer-HSC82 clones (p = 0.039, one-tailed Student t test). (D) Evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones have greater Pearson correlation distances between different conditions than evolved Scer-HSC82 clones. The result suggests that evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones generally have different fitness distribution patterns under different conditions, whereas the fitness patterns of evolved Scer-HSC82 clones are similar to each other regardless of the stress types. Pearson correlation distances in all possible pairs of conditions were pooled and compared between evolved Ylip-HSP90 and Scer-HSC82 clones (p = 0.001, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. PC, principal component; PCA, principal component analysis; Scer, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S7 Fig. Summary of mutation types and numbers in evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones.

The genomes of evolved clones were sequenced using Illumina sequencers, and mutations were identified. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data. N, nonsynonymous mutation; S, synonymous mutation; Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(EPS)

S8 Fig. Individual mutations have strong effects in different stress condition.

The fitness improvement data of Fig 6A were used to draw this figure. The height of the bar represents the level of fitness improvements in a specific condition. Blue and red colors indicate the positive and negative effects, respectively. Error bars are standard errors, N ≥ 3. The numerical data used in the figure are included in S1 Data.

(EPS)

S1 Table. Fitness measurements of cells carrying different Hsp90 orthologs under 17 growth conditions.

Hsp90, heat shock protein 90.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Fitness measurements of evolved clones under 11 growth conditions.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Correlation tests between the protein abundance of Ylip-Hsp90 and the fitness of evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones in individual conditions.

Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Summary of PCA analysis of the evolved clones.

PCA, principal component analysis.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Pearson correlation distances and p-values.

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Mutation list of evolved Ylip-HSP90 clones.

Ylip, Yarrowia lipolytica.

(XLSX)

S7 Table. Copy number variation in evolved clones.

(XLSX)

S8 Table. GO enrichment analysis of the protein-sequence-changing evolved mutations.

GO, gene ontology.

(XLSX)

S9 Table. Fitness measurements of the F1 segregants.

(XLSX)

S10 Table. Allele frequency thresholds from computational simulations and allele frequencies in the F1 segregant pools.

(XLSX)

S11 Table. Fitness measurements of reconstituted mutant strains under 11 growth conditions.

(XLSX)

S12 Table. Strain, guide RNA, and primer lists.

(XLSX)

S1 Data. Excel spreadsheet containing, in separate sheets, the underlying numerical data of Figs 1B, 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 3D, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 6A, 6B, 6C, S1, S3, S5B, S6A, S6D, S8, S2A, S2B, S4A, S4B, S4C, S6B, S6C and S7.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Whole-genome sequence files are available from the NCBI BioProject database (accession number PRJNA438196).


Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES