Abstract
(1) Introduction: Zonulin (ZO) has been proposed as a marker of intestinal permeability. Only a few studies have analyzed to date how diet influences the serum concentration of ZO among patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We performed a six-month dietetic intervention to evaluate the association between fiber intake and ZO concentration in 32 individuals with NAFLD. (2) Methods: Fiber content in the diet was estimated by Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and by analyzing 72-h nutritional diaries. ZO concentrations in serum were measured before and after the intervention by immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA). Fatty liver was quantified using the Hamaguchi score before and after the dietetic intervention. (3) Results: During the intervention, the dietary fiber intake increased from 19 g/day to the 29 g/day concomitant with an increase in the frequency of fiber consumption. All patients experienced significant (all p < 0.05) improvements in serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGTP) activities. We also detected decreased serum triglycerides (p = 0.036), homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR (p = 0.041) and insulin content (p = 0.34), and improvement of fatty liver status according to the Hamaguchi score (p = 0.009). ZO concentration in serum decreased by nearly 90% (7.335 ± 13.492 vs. 0.507 ± 0.762 ng/mL, p = 0.001) and correlated with the amount of dietary fiber intake (p = 0.043) as well as the degree of fatty liver (p = 0.037). (4) Conclusion: Increasing nutritional fiber results in reduced serum ZO levels, reduced liver enzymes and improved hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD, possibly by altering intestinal permeability. Increased dietary fiber intake should be recommended in patients with NAFLD.
Keywords: NAFLD, zonulin, fiber, diet
1. Introduction
The gut epithelium represents a key protective barrier separating internal organs from the adverse environment of the gut lumen [1]. Its permeability is controlled by several multiprotein adhesive complexes including tight junctions (TJ), subjacent adherens junctions (AJ), and desmosomes [1]. The intestinal barrier is a highly dynamic structure shaped by interactions with internal and external stimuli, such as cytokines, growth factors, and bacteria [1,2,3]. Diet-derived substances also interact with the barrier and modulate its permeability. For instance, glutamine [4,5] and tryptophan [6], peptides derived from cheese and milk [7,8], and polyphenols [9] act as positive regulators of epithelial permeability, whereas other compounds such as gliadin [10] or medium-chain fatty acids [11,12] negatively regulate intestinal barrier permeability. Zonulin (ZO) is a 47-kDa protein that regulates intestinal permeability by modulating intracellular TJ structure and function [13]. The secretion of ZO into serum is believed to be regulated by several factors, including components of the diet [14,15].
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the most common cause of chronic liver disease. It is currently detected in over 20% of Europeans, and its prevalence is predicted to increase over the years [16,17]. NAFLD is considered the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome, and the steatotic phenotype appears to be worsened by disruptions in the host gut microbiota [18,19]. An increasing body of evidence demonstrates that NAFLD correlates positively with the phenomenon of “leaky gut”, the mechanism encompassing TJ damage [20] in both young patients [13] and adults [21,22]. The disturbances of the gut-liver axis might explain, at least to a certain extent, the phenotype of fatty liver [23]. For example, gut dysbiosis and skewed production of inflammatory markers, among others lipopolysachcaride, might modulate the progression of NAFLD. This is underscored by the association between endotoxemia and severe forms of fatty liver [24]. Moreover, a dysbiotic gut ecosystem might result in increased production of endogenous ethanol, which could disrupt the integrity of the intestinal barrier and further increase liver injury in the setting of increased hepatic fat accumulation [25]. Several studies have reported that ZO concentrations increase significantly with the severity of steatosis [13,20,21] and positively correlate with body mass index (BMI), liver histopathology, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR as well as concentrations of inflammatory markers (e.g., serum IL-6) [21]. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one study that has described how a reduction diet among NAFLD patients might influence the serum concentration of ZO [13]. Here we present the impact of a six-month dietetic intervention, comprising an increased intake of fiber and a decreased intake of fat and simple sugars, on the liver status and ZO serum concentrations in a cohort of 32 patients with NAFLD.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
In the present study we included subjects selected from the Nutrient-Induced Insulin Output Ratio (NIOR) study, which was intended to investigate nutritional strategies for the individualized treatment of NAFLD [22]. In brief, this study was designed as a randomized controlled intervention trial to compare the influence of three nutrigenetic dietary strategies on fatty liver during a six-month intervention [26]. The exclusion criteria were: Diabetes mellitus (DMII); chronic and acute liver diseases other than NAFLD; high levels of physical activity (>3000 kcal/week in leisure-time physical activity); changes in physical activity during the dietary intervention; use of statins; any condition that could limit the mobility of the participant; not being able to attend control visits; vegetarianism or a need for other special diets; excessive consumption of alcohol (more than 20 g in women and more than 30 g in men, per day); and other drug addiction. Compliance with the diet was evaluated at 3 control points (at 1, 2, and 6 months after commencement of the diet) (Figure 1). All subjects were instructed to maintain their usual physical activity (metabolic equivalent of the task; MET), which was controlled by a 2-h physical activity questionnaire. Initially, 171 Caucasian adults were enrolled in the NIOR study; however, 5 subjects did not meet the inclusion criteria. After the first month of the study further 29 individuals were excluded from the study: Either they did not comply with the prescribed diet, engaged in too much physical activity or they failed to complete the dietary intake questionnaire.
At the second control meeting (i.e., 2 months after the beginning of the diet), 14 participants were excluded from the study for similar reasons. During the final visit (after 6 months), a further 13 participants were excluded. As a result, a total of 110 participants were adherent to the intervention protocol and remained in the study (Figure 1). We used an online randomization tool [26] to select patients for biochemical analyses. Serum samples from 32 participants (22 males and 10 females) were available for the current analysis. The fiber consumption was analyzed (soluble fiber as well as insoluble fiber) with the help of the Fineli base (https://fineli.fi/fineli/en/index) and the Diet program (IZZ Poland). The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Pomeranian Medical University and conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki (Szczecin, Poland, 25 01 2010 KB-0012/09/10). Participants provided written informed consent before the study.
2.2. The Nutritional Intervention and Control
The NIOR diet was modified on the basis of the of the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, including 3–5 meals/day, modified by the genetic result of NIOR as described in detail [27]. Menus were prepared as a daily plan for the 7 days of the week and included guidance on the daily timing of the five meals.
Nutrition patterns were analyzed with a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and a 72-h food diary (including 2 working days and one day free of work) [27]. Fiber content (soluble and insoluble) was estimated by means of two methods: frequency of consumption by means of the FFQ and by analyzing the 72 nutritional diaries (from the three control points) via the Diet 5 program (IZZ Poland) and Fineli (the Finnish database). Dietary content, nutritional sources and the products used are presented in Table 1. Three portions of vegetables and two portions of fruit were introduced to the patients’ diet. The recommended sources of insoluble fiber were as follows: Whole wheat bread, whole-wheat pasta, cereal and brown rice, whole rye bread, and graham bread. Recommended vegetables were: Tomatoes, savoy cabbages (fresh and pickled), napa cabbages, green beans, paprika, fresh and pickled cucumbers, onions, chives, red beans, lentils, spinach, carrots, leeks, celery, broccoli, lettuce, and dill. Recommended fruits were: apples, plums, and apricots (including dried). Finally, recommended seeds and nuts were: pumpkin seeds and walnuts. The level of physical activity was assessed using the questionnaire technique with validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Physical exercise was estimated with MET units (min/week). During the first and final visit, the degree of fatty liver was evaluated by a trained physician according to the Hamaguchi score [28], using a high-resolution B-mode abdominal ultrasound scanner (Acuson X300). Hamaguchi score ≥ 2.0 was set as the cut-off for NAFLD [28].
Table 1.
Variable | Recommendation | Recommended Sources |
---|---|---|
Energy | Calculated Individually | |
Fiber (g/day) | 30–35 | 3 portions of vegetables a day; 2 portions of fruit as: fresh, fermented or boiled, wheat bread, whole-wheat pasta, cereal and brown rice |
Fat as percentage of total calories (%) | 20–30 | Vegetable fats with a predominance of rapeseed oil and olive oil. |
Carbohydrates (low and medium IG), percentage of total calories (%) | 55–65 | Low and medium glycemic index as: wheat and mix rye/wheat bread, whole-pasta, cereal and brown rice, fruit and vegetables. |
Simple carbohydrate, percentage of total calories (%) | 5–10 | Dry fruits |
Protein (%) | 15 | Poultry (chicken and turkey), fish (oily fish 3 times a week), fermented dairy products (2 times a day), eggs (4–5 a week), lean cottage cheese, cheese with reduced fat content. |
Fluid (mL/kg) | 35 | Water, coffee (1–2 cup a day) tea (black, green). |
Vitamins and minerals | Consistent with recommended daily allowance | Natural sources from vegetables and fruit |
2.3. Laboratory Analyses
Venous fasted blood samples were collected into tubes containing anticoagulant Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Blood samples were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C within 2 h of collection. Standard blood biochemical analyses were carried out at the University Hospital Laboratory (Szczecin, Poland). Plasma ZO concentrations were measured by ELISA (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
2.4. Statistics
For statistical analyses, R software 3.0.2 was used and all results were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Since the distribution in most cases deviated from normality (Shapiro-Wilk test), non-parametric paired tests were used (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The correlations between quantitative variables were calculated using the Spearman’s correlation test.
3. Results
3.1. The Amount of Zonulin in Serum Decreases with the Improvement of Fatty Liver
As shown in Figure 2, the six-month dietetic intervention resulted in a significant improvement of liver injury markers in the studied group of 32 individuals as reflected by decreases of serum AST (p = 0.001), ALT (p = 0.001) and GGTP (p = 0.03). As shown in Table 2, it also led to a reduction of the Hamaguchi score (2.87 ± 0.59 vs. 1.40 ± 0.93; p = 0.009). Furthermore, serum triglyceride concentrations (p = 0.036), HOMA-IR (p = 0.041) index as well serum insulin (p = 0.34) decreased as a result of the dietetic intervention. Notably, we also detected a significant (p = 0.001), almost 90% reduction of serum ZO concentration as shown in Figure 2A. Table 3 demonstrates that serum ZO correlated with the degree of fatty liver (i.e., with Hamaguchi score (p = 0.037) serum AST (p = 0.041) and ALT (p = 0.043)), total lipids (p = 0.041), as well as low-density lipoprotein (p = 0.029). Interestingly, we detected a negative correlation between high-density lipoprotein and serum ZO contents (Table 3) but no significant link between ZO concentration and BMI or glucose metabolism parameters (all p > 0.05).
Table 2.
Parameters | Before Diet | After Diet | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (year) | 48.03 ±13.13 | - | - |
Body Mass (kg) | 98.76 ± 19.80 | 91.64 ± 16.60 | NS |
BMI (kg/m2) | 33.19 ±5.71 | 30.91 ± 5.45 | NS |
Fat mass (kg) | 38.08 ± 6.06 | 32.84 ± 9.41 | NS |
Lean body mass (kg) | 60.93 ± 12.90 | 58.48 ± 12.04 | NS |
Water content (kg) | 45.25 ± 9.16 | 43.81 ± 8.07 | NS |
Fatty liver (Hamaguchi score) | 2.87 ± 0.60 | 1.40 ± 0.93 | 0.009 |
Triacylglycerols (mg/dL) | 219.09 ± 326.01 | 166.31 ± 219.71 | 0.036 |
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 206.06 ± 52.54 | 200.56 ± 45.44 | NS |
High density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 44.84 ± 10.09 | 49.47 ± 14.47 | NS |
Low density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 121.15 ± 33.43 | 122. ± 60.32 | NS |
Total lipids (mg/dL) | 731.06 ± 414.63 | 706.44 ± 300.43 | NS |
Glucose (mg/mL) | 104.50 ± 20.01 | 100.78 ± 10.72 | NS |
Insulin (U/mL) | 17.90 ± 11.44 | 7.47 ± 5.34 | 0.034 |
HOMA-IR | 4.85 ± 3.14 | 1.89 ± 1.36 | 0.041 |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; NS, not significant.
Table 3.
Parameters | RHO | p Value |
---|---|---|
Age (years) | 0.05 | NS |
Body Mass (kg) | <0.01 | NS |
BMI (kg/m²) | (−) 0.18 | NS |
Fat mass (kg) | (−) 0.13 | NS |
Fat content (%) | (−) 0.17 | NS |
Lean body mass (kg) | 0.09 | NS |
Water content (kg) | 0.13 | NS |
Aspartate transaminase (U/L) | 0.35 | 0.041 |
Alanine transaminase (U/L) | 0.36 | 0.043 |
Gamma-glutamyltransferase (U/L) | 0.19 | NS |
Triacylglycerols (mg/dL) | 0.17 | NS |
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 0.22 | NS |
High density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | (−) 0.30 | 0.029 |
Low density lipoprotein (mg/dL) | 0.37 | 0.032 |
Total Lipids (mg/dL) | 0.31 | 0.041 |
Glucose (mg/mL) | (−) 0.07 | NS |
Insulin (U/mL) | (−) 0.10 | NS |
Fatty liver (Hamaguchi score) | 0.33 | 0.037 |
3.2. The Content of Zonulin in the Serum May be Related to the Increase in Fiber Consumption
The analysis of nutritional diaries showed that all patients included in the analysis followed the suggested nutritional recommendations. No significant deviations from the proposed energy supply or key nutrients intake (proteins, carbohydrates and fats) were observed. Recruited patients consumed on average 29.24 ± 10.97 g fiber per day, which is higher than the fiber intake as estimated for the Polish population i.e., 19 g per day [29]. This included: soluble fiber (6.69 ± 3.21 g per day) and insoluble fiber (17.44 ± 7.11 g per day). These calculations were done based on a 72-h recall diary subjected to the Fineli base. According to the database of the Institute of Nutrition in Poland (IZZ), the calculated fiber content was slightly lower: 28.18 g per day. We estimated that the frequency of consumption of fruits and vegetables rose among study participants from a few portions per week to a few portions per day (Table 4). The Spearman’s rank analysis indicated the existence of a correlation between the amount of fiber in the diet and the concentration of ZO in blood (p = 0.043) (Table 5). No other analyzed food constituent proved to correlate with serum ZO (p > 0.05).
Table 4.
Frequency of Consumption According FFQ | Before Intervention | During the Diet | Change in Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
Dairy products | Every day | Every day | No change |
Cereal products | A few times a day | A few times a day | No change |
Fats | Every day | Every day | No change |
Fruits | A few times a week | A few times a day | Increased |
Vegetables and grains | A few times a week | A few times a day | Increased |
Poultry, meet and fish | Every day | Every day | No change |
Abbreviation: FFQ, food frequency questionnaire.
Table 5.
Parameters | RHO | p Value |
---|---|---|
Energy of diet (kcal) | 0.01 | NS |
Protein (%) | (−) 0.01 | NS |
Fat (%) | (−) 0.07 | NS |
Saturated fatty acids (%) | (−) 0.02 | NS |
Monounsaturated fatty acids (%) | (−) 0.03 | NS |
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (%) | (−) 0.20 | NS |
Carbohydrates (%) | 0.07 | NS |
Fiber (%) | (−) 0.30 | 0.043 |
4. Discussion
NAFLD is turning into the most frequent liver condition worldwide, and diet is regarded as one of the major drivers of the steatotic phenotype. In our study we reconstructed the amount and frequency of dietary fiber consumption in patients with NAFLD and detected a correlation between ZO concentrations and fiber intake. Previously Pacifico et al. [13] demonstrated that serum ZO is elevated in the blood of obese children with NAFLD: ZO values correlated with steatosis, but not with fibrosis score, or the presence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The results presented in the study by Hendy et al. [21] suggest that ZO levels could be used for a quick and noninvasive diagnosis of liver inflammation. It was observed that once ZO serum concentration in a patient with NAFLD exceeds 8.3 ng/mL, the risk of developing NASH rises considerably. This might be significant for the development of non-invasive biomarker panels that could substitute liver biopsy [21].
In our study, we examined whether ZO concentrations decreased during the introduction of calorie restriction. Damms-Machado et al. [30] evaluated ZO contents in the stool of patients who underwent a 12-month dietary intervention and showed that ZO concentrations in stool are not influenced by weight reduction therapy and do not correlate with anthropometric variables. In our study we did not detect any significant correlations between serum ZO concentrations and the reduction of body mass parameters either. Similarly to Damms-Machado et al. [30], we observed a correlation between ZO and lipid parameters, enzymatic markers of liver injury and the degree of steatosis. Damms-Machado et al. observed that ZO concentrations among patients did not change significantly with steatosis over the course of the study [30]. They concluded that the lack of fecal ZO alterations after the intervention was a result of ZO-independent regulation of TJ occurring during the course of weight reduction, which leads to the differences in gut permeability. We previously described a similar phenomenon (ZO-independent regulation) in a study in which we analyzed the permeability of the barrier after the use of colostrum [15].
We speculate that changes in fiber intake were responsible for the reduction of ZO in the blood of our patients. Indeed, the level of dietary fiber rose in the diet of our patients regardless of the supply of other nutrients (i.e., fat or carbohydrates). Our patients were subjected to control visits four times during the 6-month dietary intervention, and only those patients who significantly increased their frequency of consumption and supply of soluble and insoluble fiber completed the study. A recently published study found that fruit fiber consumption was associated with improved liver health [31]. According to these results it was postulated that higher insoluble fiber consumption (≥7.5 g/day) leads to improvements in fatty liver parameters. Notably, a regression model proved a relationship between liver status and fruit derived fiber [31]. Our study has some limitations that should be kept in mind when interpreting the data. First of all, included patients were not biopsied, hence we did not have data on the presence of NASH. For the same reason, we did not have data on the degree of liver fibrosis in our patients. We focused on the measurements of zonulin, however other markers of intestinal permeability such as bacterial endotoxin levels, LBP protein concentration or serum citrulin might also provide additional insights into observed changes during diet. Finally, the studied cohort was relatively small and the Hamaguchi score [28], which we applied to quantify NAFLD, has not been thoroughly validated in Caucasians.
Why might the above results be of significance? Fibers fermenting in the intestine provide short-chain fatty acids that fulfill a protective and nourishing role for colonocytes, ensuring the preservation of the intestinal barrier [32]. Plant fiber provides nourishment for intestinal microbiota, which are of prime importance to the preservation of the intestinal barrier integrity [31]. The results of our study imply that appropriate fiber intake helps to maintain the proper structure and function of the intestinal barrier. The lifestyle recommendations for successful management of NAFLD promote fruit and vegetables in the diet of NAFLD patients. As our results show, the increased supply of fiber positively influences the NAFLD-associated parameters and it should be promoted among the specialists designing the diets for patients with fatty liver.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Małgorzta Standowicz, Anna Sabinicz, Małgorzata Napierała for their dietary supervision as well as to Roman Liebe for the proofreading of the manuscript.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.S., P.M. and M.K.; Methodology E.S., J.R.W.; Software, D.M.; Validation, K.R.; Formal Analysis, M.K., E.S., P.M.; Investigation D.J.M., M.C.R., J.R.; Resources, K.R., E.S.; Data Curation, K.R.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, E.S., Writing-Review & Editing, M.K.; Visualization, D.M.; Supervision, P.M.; Project Administration, K.R.; Funding Acquisition, E.S.
Funding
This research was funded by NCN, No. N404 150539.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Lechuga S., Ivanov A.I. Disruption of the epithelial barrier during intestinal inflammation: Quest for new molecules and mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2017;7:1183–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Choi W., Yeruva S., Turner J.R. Contributions of intestinal epithelial barriers to health and disease. Exp. Cell Res. 2017;358:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shimizu M. Interaction between food substances and the intestinal epithelium. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010;74:232–241. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peng X., Yan H., You Z., Wang P., Wang S. Effects of enteral supplementation with glutamine granules on intestinal mucosal barrier function in severe burned patients. Burns. 2004;30:135–139. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2003.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ding L.A., Li J.S. Effects of glutamine on intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation in TPN-rats with endotoxemia. World J. Gastroenterol. 2003;9:1327–1332. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i6.1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Watanabe J., Fukumoto K., Fukushi E., Sonoyama K., Kawabata J. Isolation of tryptophan as an inhibitor of ovalbumin permeation and analysis of its suppressive effect on oral sensitization. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2004;68:59–65. doi: 10.1271/bbb.68.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yasumatsu H., Tanabe S. The casein peptide Asn-Pro-Trp-Asp-Gln enforces the intestinal tight junction partly by increasing occludin expression in Caco-2 cells. Br. J. Nutr. 2010;104:951–956. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510001698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hashimoto K., Nakayama T., Shimizu M. Effects of beta-lactoglobulin on the tight-junctional stability of Caco-2-SF monolayer. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1998;62:1819–1821. doi: 10.1271/bbb.62.1819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Suzuki T. Regulation of intestinal epithelial permeability by tight junctions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013;70:631–659. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1070-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hollon J., Puppa E.L., Greenwald B., Goldberg E., Guerrerio A., Fasano A. Effect of gliadin on permeability of intestinal biopsy explants from celiac disease patients and patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Nutrients. 2015;7:1565–1576. doi: 10.3390/nu7031565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Usami M., Muraki K., Iwamoto M., Ohata A., Matsushita E., Miki A. Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) on tight junction permeability in intestinal monolayer cells. Clin. Nutr. 2001;20:351–359. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2001.0430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Usami M.L., Komurasaki T., Hanada A., Ohata A., Matsushita E., Miki A. Effect of gamma-linolenic acid or docosahexaenoic acid on tight junction permeability in intestinal monolayer cells and their mechanism by protein kinase C activation and/or eicosanoid formation. Nutrition. 2003;19:150–166. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00927-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pacifico L., Bonci E., Marandola L., Romaggioli S., Bascetta S., Chiesa C. Increased circulating zonulin in children with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:17107–17114. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fasano A. Zonulin, regulation of tight junctions, and autoimmune diseases. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012;1258:25–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06538.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hałasa M., Maciejewska D., Baśkiewicz-Hałasa M., Machaliński B., Safranow K., Stachowska E. Oral Supplementation with Bovine Colostrum Decreases Intestinal Permeability and Stool Concentrations of Zonulin in Athletes. Nutrients. 2017;9:e370. doi: 10.3390/nu9040370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2016;64:1388–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Estes C., Anstee Q.M., Arias-Loste M.T., Bantel H., Bellentani S., Caballeria J., Colombo M., Craxi A., Crespo J., Day C.P., et al. Modeling NAFLD Disease Burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016–2030. J. Hepatol. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.036. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Henao-Mejia J., Elinav E., Jin C., Hao L., Mehal W.Z., Strowig T., Thaiss C.A., Kau A.L., Eisenbarth S.C., Jurczak M.J., et al. Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature. 2012;482:179–185. doi: 10.1038/nature10809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shen F., Zheng R.D., Sun X.Q., Ding W.J., Wang X.Y., Fan J.G. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2017;16:375–381. doi: 10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60019-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Miele L., Marrone G., Lauritano C., Cefalo C., Gasbarrini A., Day C., Grieco A. Gut-liver axis and microbiota in NAFLD: Insight pathophysiology for novel therapeutic target. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013;19:5314–5324. doi: 10.2174/1381612811319290011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hendy O.M., Elsabaawy M.M., Aref M.M., Khalaf F.M., Oda A.M.A., El Shazly H.M. Evaluation of circulating zonulin as a potential marker in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism. 2017;69:43–50. doi: 10.1111/apm.12696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wybranska I., Malczewska-Malec M., Partyka L., Kiec-Wilk B., Kosno K., Leszczynska-Golabek I., Zdzienicka A., Gruca A., Kwasniak M., Dembinska-Kiec A. Evaluation of genetic predisposition to insulin resistance by nutrient-induced insulin output ratio (NIOR) Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2007;45:1124–1132. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Poeta M., Pierri L., Vajro P. Gut-Liver Axis Derangement in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Children. 2017;4:66. doi: 10.3390/children4080066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pang J., Xu W., Zhang X., Wong G.H., Chan A.H., Chan H.Y., Tse C.H., Shu S.T., Choi P.L., Chan H.Y., et al. Significant positive association of endotoxemia with histological severity in 237 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017;46:175–182. doi: 10.1111/apt.14119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Engstler A.J., Aumiller T., Degen C., Dürr M., Weiss E., Maier I.B., Schattenberg J.M., Jin C.J., Sellmann C., Bergheim I. Insulin resistance alters hepatic ethanol metabolism: Studies in mice and children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2016;65:1564–1571. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.QuickCalcs. [(accessed on 2 November 2016)]; Available online: https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/randomselect2.
- 27.Stachowska E., Ryterska K., Maciejewska D., Banaszczak M., Milkiewicz P., Milkiewicz M., Gutowska I., Ossowski P., Kaczorowska M., Jamioł-Milc D., et al. Nutritional Strategies for the Individualized Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Based on the Nutrient-Induced Insulin Output Ratio (NIOR) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016;17:1172. doi: 10.3390/ijms17071192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hamaguchi M., Kojima T., Itoh Y., Harano Y., Fujii K., Nakajima T., Kato T., Takeda N., Okuda J., Ida K., et al. The severity of ultrasonographic findings in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease reflects the metabolic syndrome and visceral fat accumulation. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2708–2715. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Laskowski W. Wartość Odżywcza Diety Polaków Oraz jej Zmiany. Wolska-Adamczyk, WSIiZ; Warszawa, Poland: 2015. Współczesne Kierunki Działań Prozdrowotnych, red. A. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Damms-Machado A., Louis S., Schnitzerm A., Volynets V., Rings A., Basrai M. Gut permeability is related to body weight, fatty liver disease, and insulin resistance in obese individuals undergoing weight reduction. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017;105:127–135. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.131110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cantero I., Abete I., Monreal J.I., Martinez J.A., Zulet M.A. Fruit Fiber Consumption Specifically Improves Liver Health Status in Obese Subjects under Energy Restriction. Nutrients. 2017;9:e667. doi: 10.3390/nu9070667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rinella M.E., Sanyal A.J. Management of NAFLD: A stage-based approach. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;13:196–205. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]