. 2012 Mar 9;17(3):3008–3024. doi: 10.3390/molecules17033008

Table 4.

Experimental and calculated values of the objective functions during desorption from Amberlite XAD16HP resin.

Exp.	Y_1exp	Y_1calc	Y_2exp	Y_2calc	Y_3exp	Y_3calc	Y_4exp	Y_4calc	Y_5exp	Y_5calc
1	41.7	42.1	16.6	16.6	0.350	0.387	0.220	0.245	7.98	7.65
2	46.1	46.0	16.5	17.2	0.307	0.328	0.176	0.199	8.87	8.87
3	49.3	47.8	18.5	18.1	0.413	0.392	0.249	0.238	8.43	8.70
4	50.5	49.8	19.1	18.1	0.397	0.399	0.241	0.235	9.22	9.02
5	39.5	39.8	16.1	15.6	0.356	0.319	0.233	0.202	7.63	7.85
6	45.1	42.7	15.5	14.7	0.297	0.315	0.165	0.177	8.92	8.77
7	44.3	46.6	16.0	16.6	0.323	0.321	0.188	0.183	9.36	9.29
8	43.7	45.5	15.1	16.1	0.408	0.390	0.234	0.225	8.25	8.52
9	51.5	50.4	18.4	17.8	0.410	0.437	0.235	0.247	13.3	13.3
10	50.9	50.4	17.8	17.8	0.419	0.437	0.235	0.247	14.0	13.3
11	49.0	50.4	16.5	17.8	0.469	0.437	0.254	0.247	12.9	13.3
12	50.5	50.4	18.8	17.8	0.432	0.437	0.259	0.247	13.1	13.3
13	50.0	50.4	17.5	17.8	0.452	0.437	0.235	0.247	13.4	13.3

Y₁: Phenolic desorption yield (%); Y₂: Sugars desorption yield (%); Y₃: Total phenolic content (g GAE/g extract); Y₄: Total sugar content (g D-glucose/g extract); Y₅: Radical scavenging activity (mM Trolox).