Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Nov 30;8:17522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35725-5

Excitotoxic superoxide production and neuronal death require both ionotropic and non-ionotropic NMDA receptor signaling

Angela M Minnella 1,2, Jerry X Zhao 1,2, Xiangning Jiang 4, Emil Jakobsen 5, Fuxin Lu 4, Long Wu 1,2, Jamel El-Benna 6,7, John A Gray 3, Raymond A Swanson 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6269523  PMID: 30504838

Abstract

NMDA-type glutamate receptors (NMDAR) trigger superoxide production by neuronal NADPH oxidase-2 (NOX2), which if sustained leads to cell death. This process involves Ca2+ influx through NMDAR channels. By contrast, comparable Ca2+ influx by other routes does not induce NOX2 activation or cell death. This contrast has been attributed to site-specific effects of Ca2+ flux through NMDAR. Here we show instead that it stems from non-ionotropic signaling by NMDAR GluN2B subunits. To evaluate non-ionotropic effects, mouse cortical neurons were treated with NMDA together with 7-chlorokynurenate, L-689,560, or MK-801, which block Ca2+ influx through NMDAR channels but not NMDA binding. NMDA-induced superoxide formation was prevented by the channel blockers, restored by concurrent Ca2+ influx through ionomycin or voltage-gated calcium channels, and not induced by the Ca2+ influx in the absence of NMDAR ligand binding. Neurons expressing either GluN2B subunits or chimeric GluN2A/GluN2B C-terminus subunits exhibited NMDA-induced superoxide production, whereas neurons expressing chimeric GluN2B/GluN2A C-terminus subunits did not. Neuronal NOX2 activation requires phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), and NMDA binding to NMDAR increased PI3K association with NMDA GluN2B subunits independent of Ca2+ influx. These findings identify a non-ionotropic signaling pathway that links NMDAR to NOX2 activation through the C-terminus domain of GluN2B.

Introduction

N-methyl-D-aspartate - type glutamate receptors (NMDAR) are expressed throughout the mammalian central nervous system. NMDAR are crucial for synaptic plasticity and learning, but can also mediate neuronal cell death. Most NMDAR are comprised of heteromeric assemblies of GluN1 and GluN2 subunits, both of which have C-terminal domains that extend into the neuronal cytoplasm. Agonist binding to glutamate sites on GluN2 subunits, in conjunction with co-agonist binding to glycine sites on GluN1 subunits, opens a receptor channel that is permeable to Ca2+ and other cations1. This ionotropic property is required for several downstream effects of NMDAR activation24. Though less widely recognized, NMDAR also have non-ionotropic signaling effects, i.e. signaling effects that are independent of receptor-gated ion flux510. These non-ionotropic signaling effects may be transmitted through ligand-induced conformational changes in the C-terminal cytoplasmic domains of GluN1 or GluN2 subunits11.

One of the downstream effects of neuronal NMDAR activation is production of superoxide12. Phsiological neuronal superoxide production has intercellular signaling functions13,14, but excessive neuronal superoxide production contributes to excitotoxic cell injury15,16. Superoxide produced in response to NMDAR stimulation is generated primarily by NADPH oxidase-2 (NOX2), and interventions that prevent NOX2 activation prevent excitotoxic cell death1722. NMDA-induced NOX2 activation and neuronal death are both prevented by blocking Ca2+ influx through NMDAR18,23,24, indicating a requisite role for ionotropic, NMDAR-gated calcium influx. By contrast, Ca2+ influx of comparable magnitude through other routes does not trigger these events24,25. This contrast may be reconciled by the possibility that Ca2+ influx specifically through NMDAR has privileged access to local signaling pathways25,26. However, an alternative possibility is that NOX2 activation requires, in addition to Ca2+ influx, a non-ionotropic signaling effect induced by ligand binding to NMDAR.

Here we evaluated this alternative possibility using primary mouse cortical neuron cultures. Results of these studies show that NMDA - induced NOX2 activation and cell death requires, in addition to calcium influx, non-ionotropic signaling mediated by the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of GluN2B subunits.

Results

Using mouse cortical neuron cultures, we confirmed that NMDA - induced superoxide production was prevented by a peptide inhibitor of NADPH oxidase-2 (NOX2) (Fig. 1). This result is consistent with prior studies showing that NOX2 is the primary source of superoxide production during NMDAR activation (as reviewed in16). Superoxide production was also prevented by omitting Ca2+ from the medium, confirming that neuronal NOX2 activation requires Ca2+ influx. In contrast to NMDA, the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin did not significantly increase superoxide production (Fig. 1) despite producing intracellular Ca2+ changes that were comparable in magnitude and kinetics to those produced by NMDA (Fig. 2, Suppl. Fig. S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

NMDA-induced superoxide production is Ca2+ -dependent, but not induced by Ca2+ influx alone. (a) Images show superoxide production, as measured by ethidium fluorescence (red), after incubation with NMDA (100 µM, 25 min). Scale bar = 20 µm. The NMDA-induced superoxide production is prevented by a Tat-conjugated peptide inhibitor of NOX2 (gp91ds-Tat, 3 µM) but not by a Tat-conjugated control peptide (scr-Tat). Superoxide production is also prevented by omitting Ca2+ from the medium. Superoxide production is not induced by ionomycin (3 µM). (b) Quantification of results shown in a, with results from each of n = 3 experiments expressed as percent of the NMDA-treated condition. Data are means + s.e.m.; *p < 0.01 vs control.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Ionomycin can mimic the intracellular Ca2+ elevation induced by NMDA. (af) Traces show mean changes in intracellular Ca2+ (black line) measured in individual neurons (gray lines) loaded with the high-affinity Ca2+ indicator Fura-2. Arrows mark addition of 100 µM NMDA or 3 µM ionomycin. The Ca2+ rise induced by NMDA is blocked by either 100 µM 7CK or 30 µM AP5 (c,d), and in the presence of these inhibitors the additional presence of 3 µM ionomycin reconstitutes the Ca2+ increase (e,f). (g,h) Panels show aggregate intracellular peak Ca2+ elevations as measured by the high affinity dye Fura-2 and low affinity dye Fura-FF, respectively. Note the mean Ca2+ elevation induced by 3 µM ionomycin does not exceed that induced by NMDA. Values are expressed relative to the mean values of the control condition in each of n = 4 experiments. Data are means + s.e.m.; *p < 0.05 vs control.

Given that NMDAR activation and ionomycin produced calcium elevations of similar rate and magnitude, but only NMDAR activation led to superoxide production, we asked whether superoxide production might require non-ionotropic signaling by NMDAR in addition to Ca2+ influx. To do this, we dissociated the non-ionotropic and ionotropic effects of NMDAR activation using a previously established pharmacological approach in which neurons are treated with the NMDAR glycine site antagonist 7-chlorokynurenate (7CK) to inhibit NMDAR channel opening without blocking NMDA binding69,27. Studies performed in this way confirmed that 7CK blocked NMDA-induced superoxide production (Fig. 3), as would be expected given its block of Ca2+ influx. When neurons treated with NMDA + 7CK were additionally treated with ionomycin to provide a Ca2+ influx, superoxide production was restored. Crucially, this result contrasts with the lack of superoxide production in neurons treated with ionomycin in the absence of NMDA. These results suggest that the signaling pathway linking NMDAR to superoxide production requires a non-ionotropic effect of ligand binding to NMDAR, in addition to Ca2+ influx.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

NMDA-induced superoxide production requires both Ca2+ influx and ligand binding. Images show superoxide production as measured by ethidium fluorescence (red). (a) NMDA-induced superoxide production, is prevented by 7CK (100 µM), L-689, 560 (1 µM), or MK801 (10 µM), which block NMDAR channel flux but not NMDA binding; and by 30 µM AP5, which blocks NMDA binding. The addition of ionomycin (3 µM) restores superoxide production in cultures treated with NMDA plus the channel inhibitors, but not in cultures treated with NMDA + AP5. (b,c) Quantification of results shown in (a) with results from each of n = 3 experiments expressed relative to the NMDA condition. Data are means + s.e.m.; *p < 0.05 vs control.

The rate and magnitude of intracellular Ca2+ elevations induced by these treatments were assessed using the high-affinity calcium indicator Fura-2 (Fig. 2a–g). The rates of calcium elevations induced by NMDA and ionomycin were not significantly different, with half-maximal effects achieved within 4 minutes (Suppl. Fig. 1a) and near-maximal effects within 8 minutes (Fig. 2) in all conditions. The Fura-2 observations also confirmed that both 7CK and the competitive NMDAR inhibitor (2R)-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (AP5) effectively blocked Ca2+ elevations at the concentrations employed, and that the magnitude of Ca2+ elevation induced by the ionomycin + 7CK + NMDA condition did not exceed that induced by NMDA alone. We additionally evaluated the magnitude of Ca2+ elevation using the low affinity dye Fura-FF, to exclude the possibility that differences in maximal Ca2+ elevations over the duration of these studies might be masked by saturation of the high-affinity Fura-2 indicator. The results obtained with Fura-FF were in agreement with those obtained with Fura-2 (Fig. 2h).

7CK has been used in several prior studies to uncover non-ionotropic effects of NMDAR activation69,27, but nevertheless there is a possibility that off-target effects might affect the observations. Accordingly, the studies performed here with 7CK were also performed with a structurally distinct glycine site antagonist, L-689,56028 and with the open-channel blocker, MK-801. Like 7CK, L-689,560 and MK-801 prevented NMDA-dependent increases in superoxide production, and co-incubation with ionomycin reversed this effect (Fig. 3). The results obtained with 7CK, L-689,560, and MK-801 contrast with those obtained with the competitive NMDAR antagonist, AP5. AP5 blocks NMDA binding to GluN2 subunits of NMDAR and thus prevents non-ionotropic NMDA signaling, in addition to blocking NMDAR -mediated calcium influx. As expected, AP5 prevented NMDA-induced superoxide production and this effect was not reversed by co-incubation with ionomycin (Fig. 3).

We also considered the possibility that ionomycin might have off-target effects that could influence the observations. We therefore also used a second way to induce Ca2+ influx, activation of voltage-gated calcium channels. This was accomplished as previously described26,29, using elevated KCl (50 mM) to cause depolarization, 1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-5-nitro-4-(2-[trifluoromethyl]phenyl)pyridine-3-carboxylic acid methyl ester (Bay K8644, 500 nM) to prevent channel inactivation, and an elevated medium Ca2+ content (5 mM). These conditions produced a calcium influx of similar rate and magnitude to that achieved with NMDA (Fig. 4, Suppl. Fig. 1b). As shown in Fig. 5, results of studies using this method to induce Ca2+ elevations gave results parallel to those observed with ionomycin. The intracellular Ca2+ rise induced by KCl + Bay K8644 + 5 mM calcium did not itself induce superoxide production, nor did ligand binding to NMDAR in the absence of calcium influx (NMDA + 7CK). However, the calcium influx induced by KCl + Bay K8644 + 5 mM calcium when combined with ligand binding (NMDA + 7CK) induced a robust superoxide production (Fig. 5a,b). This superoxide production was attributable to NOX2 activation, as it was completely negated by the NOX2 inhibitory peptide gp91ds-Tat (Fig. 5c).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Activation of voltage-gated calcium channels can mimic the intracellular Ca2+ elevations induced by NMDA. (ad) Traces show mean changes in intracellular Ca2+ (black line) measured in individual neurons (gray lines) loaded with the high-affinity Ca2+ indicator Fura-2. For clarity only every other obtained trace is shown. Arrows mark addition of either 100 µM NMDA or 50 mM KCl + 500 nM Bay K8644. Where indicated, the Ca2+ concentration in the medium was increased to 5 mM. The intracellular Ca2+ rise induced by NMDA is blocked by 100 µM 7CK (c), and in the presence of 7CK the addition of KCl + Bay K8644 reconstitutes the Ca2+ increase (d). (e) Panel shows the aggregate intracellular peak Ca2+ elevations as measured by Fura-2. Note the mean Ca2+ elevation induced by 50 mM KCl + Bay K8644 in 5 mM Ca2+ medium does not exceed that induced by NMDA. Values from each of n = 4 independent experiments are expressed relative to the control (no NMDA) condition. Data are means + s.e.m.; *p < 0.05 vs control.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

NMDA-induced superoxide production requires both Ca2+ influx and ligand binding. Images show superoxide production as measured by ethidium fluorescence (red). (a) NMDA-induced superoxide production is prevented by the NMDAR glycine site antagonists 7CK, which blocks NMDAR channel opening but not NMDA binding. The addition of 500 nM Bay K8644 in medium containing 50 mM KCl and 5 mM CaCl2 restores superoxide production in cultures treated with NMDA + 7CK. Scale bar = 10 µm (b) Quantification of results shown in a, with results from each of n = 4 experiments expressed relative to the NMDA treated condition. *p < 0.01 vs control. (c) Superoxide production induced by the NMDA + 7CK + KCl + Bay K8644 + 5 mM CaCl2 treatment condition is blocked by the NOX2 inhibitory peptide gp91 ds-Tat (3 µM), but not the control peptide scr-Tat. Data are means + s.e.m; n = 3, *p < 0.01.

We confirmed the effects of non-ionotropic NMDAR signaling on superoxide production with two additional markers of oxidative stress, DNA damage and lipid peroxidation, and by assessing cell death. DNA strand breaks (as identified by foci of γH2AX accumulation) and lipid peroxidation were observed in neurons treated with NMDA alone or with NMDA + 7CK + ionomycin, but not in neurons treated with NMDA + AP5 + ionomycin (Fig. 6a–c), indicating a requirement for agonist binding to NMDAR in addition to Ca2+ influx. Assessment of neuronal death at 24 hours after NMDA exposure revealed the same pattern, using either ionomycin or KCl + Bay K8644 + 5 mM CaCl2 to provide calcium influx during NMDAR ligand binding (Fig. 6d,e).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

NMDA-induced DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and cell death require both Ca2+ influx and ligand binding. (a) Double stranded DNA breaks are visualized by foci of γH2Ax immunoreactivity (red) after incubation with either NMDA or NMDA + 7CK + ionomycin, but not after incubation with NMDA + AP5 + ionomycin. Scale bar = 5 µm. (b) Quantification of results shown in a. (c) Increased lipid peroxidation after incubation with NMDA or NMDA + 7CK + ionomycin, but not after incubation with NMDA + AP5 + ionomycin. (d) Increased cell death after incubation with NMDA or NMDA + 7CK + ionomycin, but not after incubation with NMDA + AP5 + ionomycin or with ionomycin in the absence of NMDA. (e) Increased cell death after incubation with NMDA or NMDA + 7CK + voltage-gated calcium channel activation (Bay K8644 in 50 mM KCl and 5 mM CaCl2), but not after activation of voltage-gated calcium channels in the absence of NMDA. Treatment conditions are as in Figs 3 and 5. Data are means + s.e.m., expressed as fold increase over control. Cell death in the control groups was 21 ± 8%. n = 3–5; *p < 0.05 vs control.

The assembly of an activated NOX2 complex requires phosphorylation of the NOX2 p47phox subunit at serine 32824,30. Immunostaining for phospho-Ser328-p47phox confirmed that NMDAR activation induced phosphorylation of this residue (Fig. 7). Importantly, these studies also showed that the p47phox phosphorylation required a non-ionotropic effect of NMDAR stimulation: p47phox became phosphorylated in cultures treated with NMDA + 7CK + ionomycin (which prevents ion flux through the NMDAR but not ligand binding), but not in cultures treated with NMDA + AP5 + ionomycin (which prevents NMDA binding).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Phosphorylation of NADPH oxidase p47phox requires both Ca2+ influx and ligand binding. Scale bar = 5 µm. (a) Increased phosphorylation of p47phox at Ser328 occurs after incubation with NMDA or NMDA + 7CK + ionomycin, but not after incubation with NMDA + AP5 + ionomycin or with ionomycin in the absence of NMDA. Conditions are as in Fig. 3. (b) Quantification of results shown in (a), with data in each of n = 3 experiments normalized to the control condition; *p < 0.05 vs control.

Evidence suggests that NMDAR that contain GluN2B subunits are preferentially involved in superoxide production and excitotoxic cell death24,31,32. Here we prepared neurons deficient in GluN2B, GluN2A, or both subunit types using Cre-induced excision of their corresponding floxed loci33. NMDA-induced superoxide production was robust and comparable in Wt and GluN2A deficient neurons, but negligible in GluN2B deficient neurons (Fig. 8a), suggesting signaling through GluN2B but not GluN2A. However, an alternative explanation for this result is low-level GluN2A expression in the cultures, as GluN2A expression is low embryonically and increases with age34. Accordingly, we also evaluated neurons that were rendered deficient in native GluN2A and GluN2B and transfected to selectively express either GluN2A or GluN2B only. This approach was also used to selectively express chimeric GluN2A containing C-terminal GluN2B, or chimeric GluN2B containing C-terminal GluN2A. In neurons lacking both GluN2A and GluN2B, cells transfected with GluN2B but not GluN2A exhibited superoxide production in response to NMDA (Fig. 8b), thus supporting a specific role for GluN2B in this process. Importantly, GluN2A/GluN2B deficient neurons that were transfected with a chimeric GluN2A construct containing the GluN2B C-terminus (GluN2A-ct2B) also exhibited superoxide production, while those transfected with chimeric GluN2B subunits containing the GluN2A C-terminus (GluN2B-ct2A) did not (Fig. 8b). Prior studies have demonstrated efficient transfection-mediated expression of each of these constructs in immature neuron cultures3538, and electrophysiological characterization of these constructs expressed in brain slices confirmed that their intrinsic conductances are very similar (Suppl. Fig. S2). Together, these observations support the importance of the GluN2B C-terminus in NMDAR-induced NOX2 activation, and argue against the possibility that the inability of GluN2A subunits to induce NOX2 activation is because of reduced GluN2A expression or current flux.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

NMDA-induced superoxide production is mediated through the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of GluN2B and is associated with PI3K binding. (a) Selective deletion of GluN2B but not GluN2A subunits prevents superoxide formation induced by NMDA. Cultures were treated with NMDA as in Fig. 3, with results from each of n = 3 experiments expressed relative to the NMDA treated condition; *p < 0.05 vs control. (b) In neurons lacking both endogenous GluN2A and GluN2B, NMDA-induced superoxide production was observed in cultures transfected with either the GluN2B subunit (GluN2B wt) or the GluN2A subunit fused to a GluN2B C-terminal domain (GluN2A-ct2B), but not in cultures transfected with GluN2A wt or GluN2B-ct2A. Results from each of 3 experiments are expressed relative to signal obtained in cultures transfected with the empty vector GFP (Ev-GFP). The reduced magnitude of the NMDA effect in the GluN2B - transfected neurons (b) relative to that observed in Wt neurons (a) is consistent with the transfection efficiency of approximately 10% achieved with each of the GluN2 constructs. Data are means + s.e.m.; *p < 0.05 v Ev-GFP. (c) Immunoblots (IB) of PI3K p85 and GluN2B in lysates immunoprecipitated (IP) with antibody to GluN2B. IP with normal mouse IgG served as negative control. The p85 band is at ~90 kD and the GluN2B band at ~200 kD. An aliquot of the cell lysate was used as an input control to verify the presence of detected protein in the original samples. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. S4. (d) Quantified results of p85 binding to GluN2B normalized to the control values; n = 3; *p < 0.05 vs control.

The signaling pathway linking NMDAR activation to NOX2 activation requires PI3K activation, which in turn induces the phosphorylation of p47phox by the atypical (PI3K-activated) protein kinase C, PKCzeta24. NMDA-induced PI3K activation involves binding of the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K to GluN2B, either directly or via an adaptor protein3941. To determine whether this binding is induced by non-ionotropic NMDAR signaling, we immunoprecipitated GluN2B and evaluated for co-precipitation of p85. Results of these studies showed an NMDA-induced association of p85 with GluN2B even in the presence of 7CK, indicating a non-ionotropic mechanism. As expected, this association was blocked by AP5 and not induced by ionomycin (Fig. 8c,d).

The factors determining p85 binding to GluN2B are poorly understood. However, several lines of evidence indicate that phosphorylation at GluN2B Tyr1472 is required for NMDA-induced NOX2 activation42,43, and that phosphorylation at GluN2B Tyr1336 promotes p85 binding40. Phosphorylation at these sites is mediated by Src kinases, predominately Src and Fyn, which when activated are themselves phosphorylated at Tyr416. We evaluated phosphorylation at each these sites by preparing immunoblots from cultures treated for 5 minutes with NMDA or NMDA + 7CK. These blots did not, however, reveal any significant NMDA-induced changes in the phosphorylation status of these sites (Suppl. Fig. S3). The 5 -minute incubation period was used to avoid GluN2B cleavage during NMDA incubation44. An additional set of studies using 30-minute incubation intervals also revealed no significant phosphorylation changes.

Discussion

Ca2+ elevations mediated by NMDAR activation lead to excitotoxic neuronal death, whereas comparable Ca2+ elevations mediated by other Ca2+ entry routes do not25,26. The reason for this difference has not been established, but it is widely thought to stem from a privileged access to local signaling pathways by Ca2+ influx through NMDAR. The present findings suggest instead that this difference is attributable to non-ionotropic signaling induced by agonist binding to GluN2B - containing NMDAR. They demonstrate that Ca2+ influx produced by either ionomycin or voltage-gated calcium channels fails to induce superoxide formation or neuronal death unless there is a concomitant binding of ligand to NMDAR. These findings further indicate that the GluN2B C-terminal domain mediates this non-ionotropic effect of NMDAR activation. Prior studies have shown that PI3K activation is required for neuronal NOX2 activation24, and the present results also show that agonist binding to NMDAR (in the absence of Ca2+ influx) is sufficient to induce association of the PI3K p85 regulatory subunit to GluN2B.

Our findings add to previously identified roles for non-ionotropic NMDAR signaling45. This signaling mechanism was first described by Westbrook and colleagues, who found that agonist binding independent of ion flux could downregulate current flux through NMDAR through a process involving de-phosphorylation of GluN1 tyrosine residues5. Non-ionotropic effects of NMDAR were subsequently shown to mediate long-term depression, p38 phosphorylation6,7, and dendritic spine shrinkage9. A synergistic interaction between NMDAR and mGlu5 receptors on gene expression was likewise found to require NMDAR agonist binding but not current flux46. In addition to glutamate binding, glycine binding to NMDA receptors on its GluN2A subunit has been shown to have a non-ionotropic effect that promotes cell survival when ionic flux is blocked47. None of these reports identify the molecular mechanism by which ligand binding mediates these effects, but a study using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) demonstrated that agonist binding to NMDAR, without ion flow, can drive rapid and reversible movement of C-terminus cytoplasmic domains11,48, suggesting that conformational changes in these domains enable subsequent downstream signaling.

Superoxide has a variety of intercellular signaling roles both in brain and other tissues13,14,49,50. However, superoxide and its downstream reactive oxygen metabolites (including hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, peroxynitrite and others) can also contribute to pathogenesis of stroke and neurodegenerative disorders15,16,51,52. Superoxide can be produced by several mechanisms, but in the present studies the complete suppression of the superoxide ethidium signal with a peptide inhibitor of NOX2 established NOX2 as the primary source of NMDA-induced superoxide production. This is consistent with several prior reports in which suppression of NOX2 activity by pharmacological or genetic approaches blocked the superoxide formation, lipid oxidation, DNA damage, and cell death resulting from NMDAR activation16,18,20,53. Elevations in intracellular Ca2+ to levels substantially above those induced by 100 µM NMDA can, however, induce neuronal superoxide production from a source that is insensitive to NOX2 inhibitors, presumably mitochondria24,29. The ionomycin and voltage-gated calcium activation conditions used in the present studies were therefore titrated to ensure that neither the rates nor magnitude of Ca2+ elevation exceeded those induced by NMDA. Our measures of intracellular Ca2+ elevations were made in neuronal soma, which could underestimate (or overestimate) elevations that occur in subdomains such as dendritic processes or synaptic boutons. That, however, would not affect the conclusion that the Ca2+ elevations alone do not induce superoxide production or cell death in the absence of ligand binding to NMDAR.

The use of primary neuron cultures in these studies facilitated genetic and pharmacological manipulations and the measurements of Ca2+ elevations and superoxide production; however, cultured neurons do not fully reflect behavior of neurons in vivo. In particular, they exhibit reduced expression of the GluN2A NMDAR subunit during the first two weeks in vitro34. This limitation can be circumvented by transfecting the neurons with native or chimeric GluN2 constructs3538, as performed in the present study. Here, NMDA induced superoxide production in neurons that selectively expressed GluN2B (but not GluN2A) and in neurons that selectively expressed chimeric GluN2A containing C-terminal GluN2B (but not GluN2B containing C-terminal GluN2A), indicating that the GluN2B C-terminal domain is required. This is an important aspect of our results, because GluN2B - containing NMDAR have previously been shown to have a dominant role in both neuronal NOX2 - mediated superoxide production and excitotoxic cell death24,36,54.

A second limitation to this study is that it does not identify the non-ionotropic signal transduction mechanism at the molecular level. Our results do point to a potential mechanism by showing that agonist binding to NMDAR increases the association between GluN2B and the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K. This is significant because PI3K activity is required to activate protein kinase C zeta, which in turn phosphorylates and activates the NOX2 p47phox subunit24. As prior studies using FRET have shown agonist – induced conformational changes in NMDAR C-terminus domain11,48, this observation suggests that p85 binding to GluN2B may be enabled by a conformation change triggered by NMDA binding to GluN2B. Although our studies did not identify changes in GluN2B phosphorylation state associated with p85 binding, they do not exclude phosphorylation that may occur selectively in the synaptic, membrane-bound pool of NMDAR or at extrasynaptic sites, or other types of post-translational modifications. It is also possible that a conformational change alone is sufficient to permit p85 binding, without associated changes in phosphorylation, acetylation, or other modifications.

Non-ionotropic signaling provides an additional layer of complexity to NMDAR physiology. A study published during preparation of this manuscript describes a neuroprotective effect of non-ionotropic NMDAR in brain ischemia, through a mechanism involving AMPA receptor function55. Another recent study identifies a role for non-ionotropic NMDA signaling in the cytotoxic opening of pannexin channels under excitotoxic conditions, and places irreversible neuronal injury downstream of pannexin channel opening10. It will be thus be important to determine whether the signaling pathway identified here in neuronal cultures is likewise functioning in intact brain, and whether it contributes to pannexin channel opening under excitotoxic conditions.

The capacity for both ionotropic and non-ionotropic NMDAR signaling may allow NMDA receptor complexes to initiate different signaling events depending upon subunit composition, agonist and co-agonist availability, and intracellular Ca2+ levels. Given that intracellular Ca2+ dynamics are influenced by the aggregate effect of local NMDAR activation, this property may also provide a mechanism whereby the non-ionotropic effect of agonist binding to single NMDAR can be influenced by concomitant ionotropic activity of neighboring NMDAR.

Materials and Methods

Studies were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center animal studies subcommittees. Cell culture reagents were obtained from Mediatech, and all other reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich except where noted. Data analyses for all studies were performed by observers blinded to the experimental conditions.

Cortical cultures

Mixed neuron-astrocyte cultures were prepared from the cortices of embryonic day 16–18 mice and plated in 24-well culture plates or poly-D-lysine coated glass coverslips18. After 4 days in culture, 1.2 µM cytosine arabinoside was added to culture media to suppress astrocyte proliferation. The cells were subsequently maintained in NeuroBasal medium (Gibco) containing 5% FBS, 5 mM glucose, and used at day 10–15 in vitro.

Experimental conditions

The culture medium was replaced with a low-magnesium balanced salt solution (BSS): 137 mM NaCl2, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 0.4 mM MgSO4, 5.3 mM KCl, 0.4 mM NaH2PO4, 0.3 mM Na2HPO4, 5 mM glucose, and 10 mM 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonate (PIPES) buffer, pH 7.3. Where a “high calcium” medium was used, the CaCl2 concentration was increased to 5 mM and NaCl concentration was reduced to 133 mM. Experiments were initiated by the addition of either N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA), ionomycin, or KCl plus Bay K8644 from concentrated stocks. Where used, the NMDA receptor blockers 7CK, AP5, MK-801, and L-689,560 were added 10 minutes prior to NMDA.

Intracellular calcium imaging

Neurons were loaded for 30 minutes with either 4 µM Fura-2 AM or Fura-FF AM (Molecular Probes) and washed once with BSS prior to imaging. Images were acquired at 20 second intervals, using excitation that alternated between 340 nm and 380 nm (emission > 510 nm). Raw fluorescence was normalized to baseline levels prior to stimulus. Calcium elevations were then expressed as change in the ratio of 340 nm/380 nm fluorescence. Fura-FF measures were all well below saturation24. Maximal values and time to half-maximal values were calculated over the interval of 0–25 minutes after addition of test compounds to the media, using the normalized data obtained from more than 10 neurons from each of n = 3 independent experiments.

Superoxide imaging

Five µM dihydroethidium (Invitrogen) was added to cultures 10 minutes prior to the addition of the test compounds (NMDA, ionomycin, or Bay K8644) and maintained throughout the experiment. The cultures were photographed after 25 minutes incubation with a fluorescence microscope (Axiovert 40 CFL, Zeiss) using 510–550 nm excitation and >580 nm emission, and with transmitted light phase contrast. The fluorescence of oxidized ethidium species (Eth) was measured in 3 randomly chosen optical fields from each culture well and calculated as mean Eth fluorescence [area (pixels) X intensity (arbitrary units)] normalized to the cell number counted in the phase contrast images of each optical field. Measurements were made in 4 wells per experiment, with >100 neurons per well for a total of >500 neurons per “n”. Superoxide (or a superoxide metabolite) was confirmed as the reactive oxidant by negation of Eth formation in the studies where NOX2 activity was blocked.

Live cell lipid peroxidation

Image-iT lipid peroxidation kit was purchased from Molecular Probes, and labeling and detection methods were followed as described in the protocol. Briefly, cells were treated with drugs as described above, and the lipid peroxidation sensor (10 µM) was added to each well. After 20 minutes, the cells were washed twice with control BSS and images were prepared from 3 randomly selected regions in each well to evaluate fluorescence at 590 nm to 510 nm. The ratio of signal intensities was calculated as a measure of lipid peroxidation. Measurements were made in 4 wells per experiment, with >100 neurons per well, for a total of 400–500 neurons per “n”.

GluN2 subunit deletion and C-terminal domain swaps

Primary neuron cultures were prepared as described using Grin2afl/fl (GluN2A) or Grin2bfl/fl (GluN2B) mice33,56. On culture day 2, the cultures were infected with rAAV1-Cre:BFP viral stock (~1 × 1012 vg/ml), expressing a nuclear targeted Cre:BFP fusion protein. Experiments were initiated after 11 days in culture. For C-terminal domain swap studies, cultures were prepared from double-floxed Grin2afl/flGrin2bfl/fl (GluN2A/GluN2B) mice. Cultures were infected on day 2 in culture with rAAV1-Cre:BFP to eliminate expression of the floxed genes, and lipofectamine transfected on culture day 6 with either pCAGGS-GFP or pCAGGS-GluN2X-IRES-GFP (where X is wild-type or chimeric GluN2A or GluN2B). The C-terminal domains were swapped at E838 of GluN2A and E839 of GluN2B. Transfection efficiency was assessed as the fraction of GFP-positive cells in each well, and showed no significant differences among the constructs used.

Immunostaining

Formaldehyde-fixed cultures were immunostained as described previously18 using mouse antibody to microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2, Chemicon, 1:500) or rabbit antibody to anti-Ser129-Histone H2AX (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology). Antibodies to phospho-p47phox (Ser 328) were generated and characterized previously57. Antibody binding was visualized with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG or Texas Red 594-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen). Images were obtained using confocal fluorescence microscopy using step-wise 1 µm z-stack sampling. In some cases cell nuclei were also identified for fluorescence imaging by incubation with 1 µM 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) after antibody removal. Neurons were analyzed in 3 randomly chosen optical fields from each of 4 coverslips per experiment, with >100 neurons per coverslip, for a total of 400–500 neurons per “n”. Staining was quantified as fluorescence [area (pixels) ×intensity (arbitrary units)]/neuronal surface area (pixels with MAP2 immunoreactivity).

Immunoblots

Cultures were treated under the designated conditions for either 5 or 30 minutes at 37 °C, then harvested in RIPA lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (ThermoFisher Scientific). Antibodies to the following epitopes were used: GluN2B N-terminus (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, # MBS800075); phospho-Y1336 GluN2B (PhosphoSolutions, Aurora, CO, #p1516–1336); phospho-Y1472 GluN2B (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, #4208); pY416 Src (Cell Signaling Technology, #2101) and ß-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-47778). Appropriate secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies were used, and signal was visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence. Image J was used to measure the optical densities (OD, area × intensity) of the protein bands.

Immunoprecipitation (IP)

Cultures were treated under the designated conditions for 5 minutes at 37 °C, then harvested in RIPA lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Samples were diluted with IP buffer (PBS containing 1% NP40 and protease and phosphatase inhibitors) and pre-cleared with Protein G beads (Invitrogen). IP was performed overnight at 4 °C with 4 μg mouse anti-GluN2B (MyBioSource, #MBS800075) or 4 μg normal mouse IgG (IgG2b, k isotype, BioLegend, #401202) as a negative control, then incubated with Protein G beads for 2 hr at 4 °C with rotation. After washing and centrifugation, the beads were boiled for 10 min in reducing sample buffer (Invitrogen). The samples were applied to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated with rabbit GluN2B antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, #4212) or rabbit p85 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, #4257), and then with goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence. The binding of p85 with GluN2B was expressed as the OD ratio of co-immunoprecipitated p85 with GluN2B.

Cell death

Cultures were incubated under the designated experimental conditions for 30 minutes at 37 °C, then transferred to fresh BSS and incubated for an additional 24 hours. All incubations were in 0% CO2 (room air). At 24 hours calcein green-AM (5 µM, Molecular probes) was added to identify living cells, and Hoechst 33258 (1 µM, Molecular probes) to identify all cell nuclei. Analysis at the 24 hour time point was done to preclude the possibility of calcein leakage from viable cells through transiently opened pores. Photographs were taken of 3 randomly determined fields of each culture well, and cell death was quantified by counting the number of cells labeled by Hoechst 33258 but not calcein green27. Cells were counted in 3 fields from a minimum of 4 wells per plate in each independent experiment.

Statistical analyses

In all cases, the ‘n’ values denote the number of independent experiments, each using neurons prepared from different mice. Each independent experiment contained triplicate culture wells or coverslips of each study condition, with measurements obtained from at least 200 neurons in each culture well or 10 neurons on each coverslip. Data are expressed as means ± s.e.m. and assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer test where multiple groups are compared against one another, or Dunnett’s test where multiple groups are compared against a common control group.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental Figures (4.3MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NS01149, RAS; NS084057, XJ) and the U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs. We thank Jayinee Basu and Peter Swanson for technical assistance, and Dr. Roger Nicoll for helpful discussions.

Author Contributions

A.M.M. and J.X.Z. designed and performed the cell culture experiments. J.A.G. participated in experimental design and manuscript preparation, and performed the electrophysiology studies. E.J., X.J. and F.L. performed and analyzed the western blot and co-immunoprecipitation studies. L.W. prepared cell cultures and assisted in data analysis and manuscript preparation. J.E.-B. generated and provided antibody to phosphop47phox. RAS designed experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Data Availability

Full length western blots corresponding to the cropped images presented in the figures are provided as Supplementary Fig. 4. All datasets generated during this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-35725-5.

References

  • 1.Erreger K, Chen PE, Wyllie DJ, Traynelis SF. Glutamate receptor gating. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 2004;16:187–224. doi: 10.1615/CritRevNeurobiol.v16.i3.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hardingham GE, Arnold FJ, Bading H. Nuclear calcium signaling controls CREB-mediated gene expression triggered by synaptic activity. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:261–267. doi: 10.1038/85109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cole AJ, Saffen DW, Baraban JM, Worley PF. Rapid increase of an immediate early gene messenger RNA in hippocampal neurons by synaptic NMDA receptor activation. Nature. 1989;340:474–476. doi: 10.1038/340474a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shi SH, et al. Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDA receptor activation. Science. 1999;284:1811–1816. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5421.1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vissel B, Krupp JJ, Heinemann SF, Westbrook GL. A use-dependent tyrosine dephosphorylation of NMDA receptors is independent of ion flux. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:587–596. doi: 10.1038/88404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nabavi S, et al. Metabotropic NMDA receptor function is required for NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4027–4032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219454110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tamburri A, Dudilot A, Licea S, Bourgeois C, Boehm J. NMDA-receptor activation but not ion flux is required for amyloid-beta induced synaptic depression. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kessels HW, Nabavi S, Malinow R. Metabotropic NMDA receptor function is required for beta-amyloid-induced synaptic depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4033–4038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219605110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stein IS, Gray JA, Zito K. Non-Ionotropic NMDA Receptor Signaling Drives Activity-Induced Dendritic Spine Shrinkage. J Neurosci. 2015;35:12303–12308. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4289-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weilinger NL, et al. Metabotropic NMDA receptor signaling couples Src family kinases to pannexin-1 during excitotoxicity. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:432–442. doi: 10.1038/nn.4236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dore K, Aow J, Malinow R. Agonist binding to the NMDA receptor drives movement of its cytoplasmic domain without ion flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:14705–14710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520023112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lafon-Cazal M, Culcasi M, Gaven F, Pietri S, Bockaert J. Nitric oxide, superoxide and peroxynitrite: putative mediators of NMDA-induced cell death in cerebellar granule cells. Neuropharmacology. 1993;32:1259–1266. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(93)90020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thiels E, et al. Impairment of long-term potentiation and associative memory in mice that overexpress extracellular superoxide dismutase. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7631–7639. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-20-07631.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.De Pasquale R, Beckhauser TF, Hernandes MS, Giorgetti Britto LR. LTP and LTD in the visual cortex require the activation of NOX2. J Neurosci. 2014;34:12778–12787. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1414-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gonzalez-Zulueta M, et al. Manganese superoxide dismutase protects nNOS neurons from NMDA and nitric oxide-mediated neurotoxicity. J Neurosci. 1998;18:2040–2055. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-06-02040.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brennan-Minnella AM, Won SJ, Swanson RA. NADPH oxidase-2: linking glucose, acidosis, and excitotoxicity in stroke. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;22:161–174. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Girouard H, et al. NMDA receptor activation increases free radical production through nitric oxide and NOX2. J Neurosci. 2009;29:2545–2552. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0133-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brennan AM, et al. NADPH oxidase is the primary source of superoxide induced by NMDA receptor activation. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:857–863. doi: 10.1038/nn.2334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guemez-Gamboa A, et al. Activation of NOX2 by the stimulation of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors contributes to glutamate neurotoxicity in vivo through the production of reactive oxygen species and calpain activation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70:1020–1035. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182358e4e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lam TI, et al. Intracellular pH reduction prevents excitotoxic and ischemic neuronal death by inhibiting NADPH oxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E4362–4368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313029110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lu Q, et al. Increased NADPH oxidase-derived superoxide is involved in the neuronal cell death induced by hypoxia-ischemia in neonatal hippocampal slice cultures. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:1139–1151. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Suh SW, Gum ET, Hamby AM, Chan PH, Swanson RA. Hypoglycemic neuronal death is triggered by glucose reperfusion and activation of neuronal NADPH oxidase. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:910–918. doi: 10.1172/JCI30077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Choi DW. Calcium-mediated neurotoxicity: relationship to specific channel types and role in ischemic damage. Trends Neurosci. 1988;11:465–469. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90200-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brennan-Minnella AM, Shen Y, El-Benna J, Swanson RA. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase couples NMDA receptors to superoxide release in excitotoxic neuronal death. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e624. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tymianski M, Charlton MP, Carlen PL, Tator CH. Source specificity of early calcium neurotoxicity in cultured embryonic spinal neurons. J Neurosci. 1993;13:2085–2104. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-05-02085.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sattler R, Charlton MP, Hafner M, Tymianski M. Distinct influx pathways, not calcium load, determine neuronal vulnerability to calcium neurotoxicity. J Neurochem. 1998;71:2349–2364. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71062349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Giordano G, Hong S, Faustman EM, Costa LG. Measurements of cell death in neuronal and glial cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;758:171–178. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-170-3_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stone TW. Development and therapeutic potential of kynurenic acid and kynurenine derivatives for neuroprotection. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000;21:149–154. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01451-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stanika RI, Villanueva I, Kazanina G, Andrews SB, Pivovarova NB. Comparative impact of voltage-gated calcium channels and NMDA receptors on mitochondria-mediated neuronal injury. J Neurosci. 2012;32:6642–6650. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6008-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dang PM, Fontayne A, Hakim J, El Benna J, Perianin A. Protein kinase C zeta phosphorylates a subset of selective sites of the NADPH oxidase component p47phox and participates in formyl peptide-mediated neutrophil respiratory burst. J Immunol. 2001;166:1206–1213. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.2.1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhou X, Ding Q, Chen Z, Yun H, Wang H. Involvement of the GluN2A and GluN2B subunits in synaptic and extrasynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function and neuronal excitotoxicity. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:24151–24159. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.482000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vieira MM, et al. Multiple domains in the C-terminus of NMDA receptor GluN2B subunit contribute to neuronal death following in vitro ischemia. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;89:223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gray JA, et al. Distinct modes of AMPA receptor suppression at developing synapses by GluN2A and GluN2B: single-cell NMDA receptor subunit deletion in vivo. Neuron. 2011;71:1085–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhong J, Russell SL, Pritchett DB, Molinoff PB, Williams K. Expression of mRNAs encoding subunits of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in cultured cortical neurons. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;45:846–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Edman S, et al. TCN 201 selectively blocks GluN2A-containing NMDARs in a GluN1 co-agonist dependent but non-competitive manner. Neuropharmacology. 2012;63:441–449. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Martel MA, et al. The subtype of GluN2 C-terminal domain determines the response to excitotoxic insults. Neuron. 2012;74:543–556. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Marwick KFM, Parker P, Skehel P, Hardingham G, Wyllie DJA. Functional assessment of the NMDA receptor variant GluN2A (R586K) Wellcome Open Res. 2017;2:20. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10985.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sanz-Clemente A, Gray JA, Ogilvie KA, Nicoll RA, Roche KW. Activated CaMKII couples GluN2B and casein kinase 2 to control synaptic NMDA receptors. Cell Rep. 2013;3:607–614. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sutton G, Chandler LJ. Activity-dependent NMDA receptor-mediated activation of protein kinase B/Akt in cortical neuronal cultures. J Neurochem. 2002;82:1097–1105. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hisatsune C, Umemori H, Mishina M, Yamamoto T. Phosphorylation-dependent interaction of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor epsilon 2 subunit with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Genes Cells. 1999;4:657–666. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1999.00287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang YB, et al. Adaptor protein APPL1 couples synaptic NMDA receptor with neuronal prosurvival phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. J Neurosci. 2012;32:11919–11929. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3852-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Knox R, et al. NR2B phosphorylation at tyrosine 1472 contributes to brain injury in a rodent model of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. Stroke. 2014;45:3040–3047. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Trepanier CH, Jackson MF, MacDonald JF. Regulation of NMDA receptors by the tyrosine kinase Fyn. FEBS J. 2011;279:12–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wu HY, et al. Fyn-mediated phosphorylation of NR2B Tyr-1336 controls calpain-mediated NR2B cleavage in neurons and heterologous systems. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:20075–20087. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700624200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gray, J. A., Zito, K. & Hell, J. W. Non-ionotropic signaling by the NMDA receptor: controversy and opportunity. F1000Res5 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Yang L, et al. A novel Ca2+ -independent signaling pathway to extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase by coactivation of NMDA receptors and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in neurons. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10846–10857. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2496-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hu R, et al. Glycine triggers a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2A-containing NMDA receptors to confer neuroprotection. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34459. doi: 10.1038/srep34459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aow J, Dore K, Malinow R. Conformational signaling required for synaptic plasticity by the NMDA receptor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:14711–14716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520029112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Massaad CA, Klann E. Reactive oxygen species in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and memory. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14:2013–2054. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sorce S, Krause KH. NOX enzymes in the central nervous system: from signaling to disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:2481–2504. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang Q, et al. Post-treatment with an ultra-low dose of NADPH oxidase inhibitor diphenyleneiodonium attenuates disease progression in multiple Parkinson’s disease models. Brain. 2015;138:1247–1262. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li P, et al. Oxidative stress and DNA damage after cerebral ischemia: Potential therapeutic targets to repair the genome and improve stroke recovery. Neuropharmacology. 2018;134:208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang QG, et al. Estrogen attenuates ischemic oxidative damage via an estrogen receptor alpha-mediated inhibition of NADPH oxidase activation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:13823–13836. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3574-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vieira, M. M. et al. Multiple domains in the C-terminus of NMDA receptor GluN2B subunit contribute to neuronal death following in vitro ischemia. Neurobiol Dis (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 55.Chen J, et al. A non-ionotropic activity of NMDA receptors contributes to glycine-induced neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03909-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chen BS, et al. SAP102 mediates synaptic clearance of NMDA receptors. Cell Rep. 2012;2:1120–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Boussetta T, et al. The prolyl isomerase Pin1 acts as a novel molecular switch for TNF-alpha-induced priming of the NADPH oxidase in human neutrophils. Blood. 2010;116:5795–5802. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-273094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figures (4.3MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Full length western blots corresponding to the cropped images presented in the figures are provided as Supplementary Fig. 4. All datasets generated during this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES