Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2013 Jun 10;18(6):6908–6918. doi: 10.3390/molecules18066908

Preliminary Biological Evaluation of Novel 99mTc-Cys-Annexin A5 as a Apoptosis Imaging Agent

Chunxiong Lu 1, Quanfu Jiang 1, Minjin Hu 2, Cheng Tan 1, Yu Ji 2, Huixin Yu 1,*, Zichun Hua 2,3,*
PMCID: PMC6270223  PMID: 23752473

Abstract

A novel annexin A5 derivative (cys-annexin A5) with a single cysteine residue at its C-terminal has been developed and successfully labeled in high labeling yield with 99mTc by a ligand exchange reaction. Like the 1st generation 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5, the novel 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 derivative shows in normal mice mainly renal and, to a lesser extent, hepatobiliary excretion. In rat models of hepatic apoptosis there was 283% increase in hepatic uptake of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 as compared to normal mice. The results indicate that the novel 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 is a potential apoptosis imaging agent.

Keywords: cys-annexin A5, 99mTc-labelled, biodistribution, apoptosis imaging

1. Introduction

Apoptosis or programmed cell death (PCD) plays an important role not only in physiology but also in pathology [1,2]. Therefore, the detection and quantification of apoptosis in vivo are of significant clinical value for diagnosis and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

One of the hallmarks of cells going into apoptosis is the externalization of the phospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) at the cell membrane [3,4]. Annexin A5, a 36-kDa human protein, shows Ca2+-dependent binding to negatively charged phospholipid surfaces and was discovered as a vascular anticoagulant protein [5,6]. The anticoagulant activity is based on the high-affinity for PS. These characteristics make a derivative of annexin A5 a suitable candidate for imaging of apoptosis.

Several annexin A5 conjugates tagged with fluorophores and bifunctional chelators (BFC) have been shown to retain the PS affinity of native annexin A5 [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. In vivo detection, identification, and characterization of apoptosis is even more difficult. There has only been limited success so far in monitoring apoptosis by standard, noninvasive in vivo imaging modalities such as radionuclide imaging methods. The radionuclide of choice for the labeling of annexin A5 for single-photon imaging applications is often considered to be technetium-99m (99mTc). Besides favorable photon energy and decay properties, it is continuously available at a reasonable cost from a generator. Several 99mTc-labeling chelators have been reported, and they include n-1-imino-4-mercaptobutyl (imino) [14], ethylenedicysteine (EC) [10,15], 4,5-bis(thioacetamido)pentanoyl (BTAP) [7,16,17], mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) [8] and hydrazinonicotinamido (HYNIC) [18,19,20]. One of the most widely used derivatives has been the 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 for imaging apoptosis by single photon emmission computed tomography (SPECT) [11,12,13]. Conjugation of HYNIC to annexin A5 for labeling with technetium-99m is usually done by targeting an amino group of one of the 21 lysine residues using N-succinimidyl HYNIC, but this method is rather non-specific as any of the –NH2 groups could be targeted.

Recent studies reveal that after structural modification in the recombinant expression annexin A5 can be directly marked with 99mTc, such as 99mTc(CO)3-HIS-cys-AnxV [21], 99mTc-annexin-V-117 [22] and 99mTc-His10-annexin V [23]. New annexin A5 molecules labeled by site-specific methods will greatly improve sensitivity for detecting cell death in vivo [24]. Recently, Professor Hua Zichun and his colleagues have developed a novel annexin A5 derivative (cys-annexin A5) with a single cysteine residue at C-terminal [25]. Their findings show that the the detection signal of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-cys-annexin A5 is greater than that of FITC-wild-type annexin A5.

We herein report the labeling and preliminary in vivo evaluation of the novel site-specific 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in normal mice and in rat models of apoptosis induced by cycloheximide. In mice tracer uptake was studied by ex vivo biodistribution experiments and the results were compared to those of the 1st-generation 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5. In a rat model of hepatic apoptosis, tracer uptake was studied by SPECT. Apoptosis was confirmed in situ on liver slices using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP nick endlabeling (TUNEL) assay.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Radiolabeling

Annexin A5 has been labelled with a number of isotopes including99mTc, 124I, 18F and 68Ga [18,26,27,28,29]. Positron emission tomography (PET) with its higher sensitivity, better spatial resolution and the ability to better quantify the radiopharmaceutical uptake is superior to SPECT imaging, and the low uptake of 18F-annexin A5 in the liver, spleen and kidney might represent an advantage over 99mTc-annexin A5 [30], however production of 18F-annexin A5 depends on the availability of an expensive on-site cyclotron for the production of fluorine-18 (t1/2 = 109.8 min). 68Ga has suitable physical properties for PET imaging. Recently, it was reported that 68Ga-annexin A5 has a similar biodistribution in mice compared with other 99mTc-annexin A5 [29]. In the present study, site-specific labeling of cys-annexin A5 with 99mTc by a ligand exchange reaction. In the presence of disodium edetate, 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was labeled with Na99mTcO4 by reduction with stannous chloride.

HPLC analysis revealed cys-annexin A5 and 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 that were eluted at a same retention time of 9.8 m, whereas 99mTc-colloidal and the formation of free technetium (Na99mTcO4) eluted at a retention times of 12.5 m and 15.9 m, respectively (Figure 1). For each radiolabeled complex, the single peak in the HPLC-chromatogram clearly shows the formation of only one complex and excludes the possibility of residual Na99mTcO4 or other components.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

HPLC chromatograms (cys-annexin A5 tR = 9.8 min (UV), 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 tR = 9.8 min, 99mTc-colloidal tR = 12.5 min and Na99mTcO4 tR = 15.9 min).

According the HPLC analysis, the radiochemical purity of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was greater than 95%. The radiolabeled compounds were used immediately after the formulation for both in vitro and in vivo studies.

2.2. Blood Kinetics Studies

Pharmacokinetic parameters were listed in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the blood clearance of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in the mice 4 h post injection. Pharmacokinetics of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 comply with the two-compartment model with the pharmacokinetic equation of C = 5.972e−0.123t + 0.877e−0.005t. The values of CL and AUC were 0.084 and 238, respectively.

Table 1.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of the 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in mice.

Parameters 99mTc-cys-annexin v
K12 (min−1) 0.079
K21 (min−1) 0.02
Ke (min−1) 0.029
CL (%ID/g/min) 0.084
T1/2α (min) 5.619
T1/2β (min) 129.465
AUC (%ID/g*min) 238.123

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pharmacokinetic curve in the mice for 99mTc-cys-annexin A5.

In the early phase, the blood clearance of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was fast. After 1 h, the radioactivity concentration of the tracer agent in blood reaches an equilibrium which coincides with the pharmacokinetic parameters CL, AUC and the pharmacokinetic curves.

2.3. Biodistribution Studies

Biodistribution of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was determined in ICR mice, and the data are shown in Figure 3 as the percentage administered activity (injected dose) per gram of tissue (%ID/g). Inspecting Figure 3, one can observe that 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was mainly accumulated in the kidney, which means that the clearance of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was mainly through the renal pathway. There was moderate uptake of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in the bladder, lung, and liver; uptake was low in the heart, spleen, stomach, bowels and skeletal tissue; uptake was very low in the brain and muscles. Most 99mTc-labeling annexin A5 derivatives had a similar biodistribution in vivo, accumulated in the kidney and liver. Because of their different chelators, there were some differences in biodistribution between them. 99mTc-imino-annexin A5, 99mTc-EC-annexin A5, 99mTc-BTAP-annexin A5 and 99mTc-MAG3-annexin A5 showed higher uptake than 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 in intestines [7,8,10,14,16]. 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 had higher uptake than 99mTc-MAG3-annexin A5 in kidney and liver [8]. 99mTc-BTAP-annexin A5 was excreted significantly faster than 99mTc-imino-annexin A5 [16]. Compared with 99mTc-imino-annexin A5 [14,16], 99mTc-EC-annexin A5 [15], 99mTc-BTAP-annexin A5 [16] and 99mTc-MAG3-annexin A5 [8], the degree of uptake of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was relatively less in the intestine, and 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was suitable for the imaging of the abdomen.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Biodistribution of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in mice (mean ± SD, n = 5, %ID/g).

Table 2 shows the biodistribution results in normal mice of novel 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 and 1st-generation 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 at 60 min pi, expressed as %ID/g. The uptakes of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 in spleen and kidney were 6.52 ± 1.02%ID/g and 114 ± 17.1%ID/g, respectively. However, the uptakes of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in spleen and kidney were 0.60 ± 0.03%ID/g and 11.61 ± 1.12%ID/g, respectively, which were smaller than those of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5. Similar values of the uptakes of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 and 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in stomach and small intestines. 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 has been successfully used in many studies, however it has certain limitations most notably, its very high uptake in the kidney – which results in high radiantion dose and may limit imaging in the abdomen [18]. Therefore 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 maybe more suitable than 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 for imaging in the abdomen.

Table 2.

Biodistribution of 99mTc-HYNIC-Annexin A5 and 99mTc-cys-annexin A5.

Tissue %ID/g(60min)
99mTc-cys-annexin A5 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin A5 [7]
Heart 0.26 ± 0.03 1.20 ± 0.25
Liver 1.50 ± 0.15 6.65 ± 1.02
Spleen 0.60 ± 0.03 6.52 ± 1.56
Lung 1.42 ± 0.30 2.56 ± 0.68
Kidney 11.61 ± 1.12 114 ± 17.1
Stomach 1.07 ± 0.44 1.33 ± 0.19
S. intestines 0.89 ± 0.16 0.97 ± 0.09
Muscle 0.24 ± 0.14 0.37 ± 0.08
Bone 0.25 ± 0.03 0.78 ± 0.14
Blood 0.64 ± 0.15 1.77 ± 0.31

2.4. Imaging of Rat Model of Apoptosis

There were three rats treatment with cycloheximide to induce liver apoptosis and two rats as the control group. Figure 4 shows the planar images of normal and cycloheximide (CHX)-treated rats. 99mTc-cys- annexin A5 tracer uptake in the liver was increased with CHX treatment (indicated by arrows). Biodistribution of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in treated rats indicated that liver, spleen and kidney uptakes were 0.28 ± 0.01%ID/g,1.22 ± 0.03%ID/g and 5.21 ± 0.02%ID/g, respectively, at 190 m p.i. The uptakes in liver, spleen and kidney of control rats were 0.10 ± 0.005%ID/g, 0.25 ± 0.01%ID/g and 5.50 ± 0.03%ID/g, respectively, at 190 m p.i. The uptake ratios (treated/control) of liver, spleen and kidney were 2.83, 4.94 and 0.95, respectively, at 190 m p.i. There were no differences in the blood pool activity between treated and control rats. The changes observed in 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 biodistribution as measured via SPECT correlated with the increase in cell death observed using TUNEL histochemistry.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Planar imaging of rat model of apoptosis.

Analysis of TUNEL-stained sections confirmed that a clear increase in the number of TUNEL-positive cells was present in liver, 6 h following an i.p. injection of CHX (See Figure 5). Photomicrographs of the corresponding 5 µm liver section after TUNEL staining of CHX-treated rat (1st column) and control (2nd column) 6 h after CHX treatment. TUNEL-positive nuclei (green nuclei, indicated by arrows) are diffused in treated, but little in control mice and indicate apoptosis.

Figure 5.

TUNEL staining of liver sections.

Figure 5

Rat treated with CHX    Untreated rat liver

2.5. Toxicity Test

The toxicity test was evaluated by the death and 48 h survival of the mice, which were injected with 0.5 mL 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 (3.7MBq), respectively. Saline-injected (of the same volume) mouse group was used as the control group. As expected, the mice showed no signs of toxicity through the overall study period.

In summary, 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 is a promising imaging agent in the detection of apoptosis and early assessment of tumor therapeutic efficacy. We plan to develop a lyophilized kit of cys-annexin A5 for 99mTc-labeling for clinical use.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

All analytical chemical reagents employed were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. cys-Annexin A5 was supplied by Jiangsu Target Pharma Laboratories Inc. (Changzhou, China). Na99mTcO4 was supplied by Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine (Wuxi, China) HPLC was performed on a Waters 600-type high-performance liquid chromatography (Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a dural λ absorbance detector (Waters 2487), binary HPLC pump (Waters 1525) and Cd(Te) detector equipped with a scintillation analyzer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). A Packard-multi-prias γ counter (made in USA), a fluorescence microscope (Olympas X51, Tokyo, Japan) and a Philips SKY Light single photon emission computed tomography instrument (SPECT) (San Francisco, CA, USA) were used. The animal experiments in this study were approved by the Animal Care and Ethnics Committee of Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine.

3.2. Radiochemical Synthesis of 99mTc-cys-Annexin A5

In the labeling of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5, cys-annexin A5 (50 µg) was dissolved in 50 µL PBS (0.1 mol/L, pH =7.4) in an evacuated nitrogen filled vial. To this solution, disodium edetate (1.5 mg) dissoleved in PBS (75 µL, 0.1 mol/L, pH =7.4), stannous chloride (20 µg) dissolved in HCl (20 µL, 0.1 mol/L) were added respectively. After addition of all reagents, [Tc-99m]pertechnetate solution (~18.5 MBq, 0.1 mL) was added into the vial. Reaction mixture volume used was about 0.3 mL. The vial was incubated at 37 °C in a water bath for 15 min.

3.3. Quality Control of 99mTc-cys-Annexin A5

The radiochemical purity (RCP) and radiolabeling yield (RLY) of 999mTc-cys-annexin v was determined by HPLC. The RCP of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was determined a Waters 600-type high-performance liquid chromatography. The sample was passed through a millipore filter carefully and injected into the HPLC column (TSK-GEL swG2000SWXL, 300 × 7.8 mm 5 µm, Tosoh Bioscience Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). The absorbance was measured on the UV detector at 278nm. Radioanalysis of the labeled compound was conducted using a Cd (Te) detector. The flow rate was adjusted to 0.8 mL/min and the isocratic mobile phase was 0.05 mol/L phosphate buffer (Ph = 7.0).

3.4. Biodistribution in Normal Mice of 99mTc-cys-Annexin A5

Thirty-five ICR mice were randomly divided into seven groups and injected via the tail vein with 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 in the volume of 0.2 mL and activity of approximately 3.7 MBq. Groups of mice were sacrificed at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min after injection. The organs of interest (brain, heart, liver, lung, kidney, spleen and muscle etc.) were dissected and weighed, as well as 100 μL blood were taken from carotid artery. The activity for each sample was determined by a γ counter. Distribution of the radioactivity in different tissues and organs was calculated and expressed as percentage of injection dose per gram (%ID/g).

3.5. Animal Model of Apoptosis

Three male SD rats (288 ± 1g) were treated IV with 5 mg/kg cycloheximide to induce liver apoptosis. Two male SD rats (289 g and 291 g) were treated IV with saline as the control group. 3 h after the treatment, rats were injected via the tail vein with 0.2 mL (18.5 MBq) 99mTc-cys- annexin A5 and 3 h later imaged with SPECT for 10 min. The organs of interest (liver, spleen and kidney) were dissected and weighed at the end of the scan. Liver samples were divided into 2 parts. Then, using aliquots of the liver, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens were prepared for Terminal deoxynucleotidyl Transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining.

3.6. TUNEL Staining

Because our imaging studies were designed to determine the uptake and biodistribution of 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 after chemically induced apoptosis, it was important to confirm apoptosis in the livers of treated rats by independent methods that provide quantitative results. A marker of apoptosis was scored by performing a TUNEL assay that measures DNA fragmentation, a characteristic feature of apoptosis. Terminal deoxynucleotide transferase adds labeled nucleotides to the 3′ termini at double-stranded breaks in the fragmented DNA. TUNEL assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using the fluorescein-conjugated Colorimetric TUNEL Apoptosis Assay Kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Briefly, slices were freed of paraffin through xylene and graded EtOH washes and then incubated with proteinase K (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) (2 mg/mL in 10 mmol/L Tris, pH 8.0). After proteinase digestion, the slides were equilibrated in pH 7.4 buffer, the terminal deoxynucleotide transferase enzyme and Biotin-dUTP labeling mix (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) were added, and the slides were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in a humid chamber. The number of TUNEL-positive cells was counted on 10 randomly selected ×100 fields for each section by use of a Olympus fluorescence microscope.

4. Conclusions

Cys-annexin A5, a novel annexin A5 derivative with a single cysteine residue at the C-terminal, could be labeled with 99mTc in high yields and high radiochemical purity. In normal mice, 99mTc-cys-annexin A5 was rapidly cleared from the blood and excreted mainly through the renal pathway. Hepatic uptake of 99mTc–cys-annexin A5 was significantly increased in the rats treated with CHX compared to controls, which correlated well with the increase in cell death observed using TUNEL histochemistry. These results indicate that the novel 99mTc–cys-annexin A5 is a potential apoptosis imaging agent and further optimization of the cys-annexin A5 kit is nevertheless desirable in order to improve the potential clinical usefulness of this new technique.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the Ministry of Health Foundation of China (W201207) ,Open Fund Project (KF-GN-201304) of State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology and Public service platform for Science and technology infrastructure construction project of Jiangsu Province (BM2012066) for their financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Sample of the compound cys-annexin A5 is available from the authors.

References

  • 1.Fink S.L., Cookson B.T. Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: Mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:1907–1916. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.4.1907-1916.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hofstra L., Liem I.H., Dumont E.A., Boersma H.H., van Heerde W.L., Doevendans P.A., DeMuinck E., Wellens H.J.J., Kemerink G.J., Reutelingsperger C.P.M., et al. Visualisation of cell death in vivo in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2000;356:209–212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02482-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thiagarajan P., Tait J.F. Binding of Annexin-V Placental Anticoagulant ProteinI To Platelets—Evidence For Phosphatidylserine Exposure In The Procoagulant Response Of Activated Platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:17420–17423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tait J.F., Gibson D., Fujikawa K. Phospholipid Binding-Properties Of Human Placental Anticoagulant Protein-I, A Member Of the Lipocortin Family. J. Biol. Chem. 1989;264:7944–7949. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gerke V., Moss S.E. Annexins: From structure to function. Physiol. Rev. 2002;82:331–371. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00030.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koopman G., Reutelingsperger C.P.M., Kuijten G.A.M., Keehnen R.M.J., Pals S.T., Vanoers M.H.J. Annexin-V For Flow Cytometric Detection Of Phosphatidylserine Expression On B-cells Undergoing Apoptosis. Blood. 1994;84:1415–1420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kemerink G.J., Boersma H.H., Thimister P.W., Hofstra L., Liem I.H., Pakbiers M.T., Janssen D., Reutelingsperger C.P., Heidendal G.A. Biodistribution and dosimetry of 99mTc-BTAP-annexin-V in humans. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2001;28:1373–1378. doi: 10.1007/s002590100578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vanderheyden J.L., Liu G., He J., Patel B., Tait J.F., Hnatowich D.J. Evaluation of 99mTc-MAG3-annexin V: Influence of the chelate on in vitro and in vivo properties in mice. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2006;33:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ranji M., Kanemoto S., Matsubara M., Grosso M.A., Gorman J.H., Gorman R.C., Jaggard D.L., Chance B. Fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging of myocardial apoptosis. J. Biomed. Opt. 2006;11:064036. doi: 10.1117/1.2400701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kurihara H., Yang D.J., Cristofanilli M., Erwin W.D., Yu D.F., Kohanim S., Mendez R., Kim E.E. Imaging and dosimetry of 99mTc EC annexin V: Preliminary clinical study targeting apoptosis in breast tumors. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2008;66:1175–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rottey S., Loose D., Vakaet L., Lahorte C., Vermeersch H., van Belle S.V., Wiele C. 99mTc-HYNIC Annexin-V imaging of tumors and its relationship to response to radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2007;51:182–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rottey S., Bossche B., Slegers G., Van Belle S., Wiele C. Influence of chemotherapy on the biodistribution of [99mTc]hydrazinonicotinamide annexin V in cancer patients. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2009;53:127–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kartachova M., van Zandwijk N., Burgers S., van Tinteren H., Verheij M., Valdes Olmos R.A. Prognostic significance of 99mTc Hynic-rh-annexin V scintigraphy during platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:2534–2539. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kemerink G.J., Liem I.H., Hofstra L., Boersma H.H., Buijs W., Reutelingsperger C.P.M., Heidendal G.A.K. Patient dosimetry of intravenously administered Tc-99m-annexin V. J. Nucl. Med. 2001;42:382–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang D.J., Azhdarinia A., Wu P., Yu D.F., Tansey W., Kalimi S.K., Kim E.E., Podoloff D.A. In vivo and in vitro measurement of apoptosis in breast cancer cells using 99mTc-EC-annexin V. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2001;16:73–83. doi: 10.1089/108497801750096087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Boersma H.H., Liem I.H., Kemerink G.J., Thimister P.W.L., Hofstra L., Stolk L.M.L., van Heerde W.L., Pakbiers M.T.W., Janssen D., Beysens A.J., et al. Comparison between human pharmacokinetics and imaging properties of two conjugation methods for Tc-99m-Annexin A5. Br. J. Radiol. 2003;76:553–560. doi: 10.1259/bjr/30385847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kemerink G.J., Thimister P., Boersma H.H., Pakbiers M.T., Janssen D.M., Hofstra L., Bos G.M., Reutelingsperger C.P., Heidendal G.A. Biodistribution and dosimetry of Tc-99m-phenthioate-annexin V in humans. J. Nucl. Med. 2001;42:248P–249P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kemerink G.J., Liu X., Kieffer D., Ceyssens S., Mortelmans L., Verbruggen A.M., Steinmetz N.D., Vanderheyden J.L., Green A.M., Verbeke K. Safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V, a novel human recombinant annexin V for human application. J. Nucl. Med. 2003;44:947–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tokita N., Hasegawa S., Maruyama K., Izumi T., Blankenberg F.G., Tait J.F., Strauss H.W., Nishimura T. 99mTc-Hynic-annexin V imaging to evaluate inflammation and apoptosis in rats with autoimmune myocarditis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2003;30:232–238. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1006-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van de Wiele C., Lahorte C., Vermeersch H., Loose D., Mervillie K., Steinmetz N.D., Vanderheyden J.L., Cuvelier C.A., Slegers G., Dierck R.A. Quantitative tumor apoptosis imaging using technetium-99m-HYNIC annexin V single photon emission computed tomography. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21:3483–3487. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De Saint-Hubert M., Wang H., Devos E., Vunckx K., Zhou L., Reutelingsperger C., Verbruggen A., Mortelmans L., Ni Y., Mottaghy F.M. Preclinical Imaging of Therapy Response Using Metabolic and Apoptosis Molecular Imaging. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2011;13:995–1002. doi: 10.1007/s11307-010-0412-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tait J.F., Brown D.S., Gibson D.F., Blankenberg F.G., Strauss H.W. Development and characterization of annexin V mutants with endogenous chelation sites for (99m)Tc. Bioconjug. Chem. 2000;11:918–925. doi: 10.1021/bc000059v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ye F., Fang W., Wang F., Hua Z.-C., Wang Z., Yang X. Evaluation of adenosine preconditioning with Tc-99m-His(10)-annexin V in a porcine model of myocardium ischemia and reperfusion injury: Preliminary study. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2011;38:567–574. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tait J.F., Smith C., Levashova Z., Patel B., Blankenberg F.G., Vanderheyden J.L. Improved detection of cell death in vivo with annexin V radiolabeled by site-specific methods. J. Nucl. Med. 2006;47:1546–1553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hua Z., Hu M. Human annexin V variants and expression, preparation and application. CN102690345A. 2012 2012 Sep 26;
  • 26.Keen H.G., Dekker B.A., Disley L., Hastings D., Lyons S., Reader A.J., Ottewell P., Watson A., Zweit J. Imaging apoptosis in vivo using 124I-annexin V and PET. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2005;32:395–402. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zijlstra S., Gunawan J., Burchert W. Synthesis and evaluation of a 18F-labelled recombinant annexin-V derivative, for identification and quantification of apoptotic cells with PET. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2003;58:201–207. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(02)00302-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu S., Kiesewetter D.O., Zhu L., Guo N., Gao H., Liu G., Hida N., Lang L., Niu G., Chen X. Longitudinal PET Imaging of Doxorubicin-Induced Cell Death with (18)F-Annexin V. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2012;14:762–770. doi: 10.1007/s11307-012-0551-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bauwens M., de Saint-Hubert M., Devos E., Deckers N., Reutelingsperger C., Mortelmans L., Himmelreich U., Mottaghy F.M., Verbruggen A. Site-specific Ga-68-labeled Annexin A5 as a PET imaging agent for apoptosis. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2011;38:381–392. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Murakami Y., Takamatsu H., Taki J., Tatsumi M., Noda A., Ichise R., Tait J.F., Nishimura S. 18F-labelled annexin V: A PET tracer for apoptosis imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2004;31:469–474. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1378-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES