Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2013 Dec 4;18(12):14948–14960. doi: 10.3390/molecules181214948

Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Essential Oils of Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare L. under Different Growth Conditions

Enrica De Falco 1, Emilia Mancini 1, Graziana Roscigno 1, Enrico Mignola 2, Orazio Taglialatela-Scafati 2,*, Felice Senatore 2
PMCID: PMC6270476  PMID: 24304588

Abstract

This research was aimed at investigating the essential oil production, chemical composition and biological activity of a crop of pink flowered oregano (Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare L.) under different spatial distribution of the plants (single and binate rows). This plant factor was shown to affect its growth, soil covering, fresh biomass, essential oil amount and composition. In particular, the essential oil percentage was higher for the binate row treatment at the full bloom. The chemical composition of the oils obtained by hydrodistillation was fully characterized by GC and GC-MS. The oil from plants grown in single rows was rich in sabinene, while plants grown in double rows were richer in ocimenes. The essential oils showed antimicrobial action, mainly against Gram-positive pathogens and particularly Bacillus cereus and B. subtilis.

Keywords: Origanum vulgare subsp. vulgare, plant distribution, essential oil composition, antimicrobial activity

1. Introduction

Aromatic plants are considered of great interest for their flavours and for their medicinal properties, along with human consumption, animal foodstuff and ornamental uses; thus, they are especially suitable for multifunctional sustainable crop models [1,2,3,4]. A large number of these aromatic species belong to the family Lamiaceae, whose centre of differentiation is located in the Mediterranean area. Within this family, oregano (Origanum vulgare subsp. vulgare) is probably one of most widely used aromatic plant, whose essential oils are particularly rich in mono- and sesquiterpenes [5].

Oregano essential oils have been shown to possess antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, diaphoretic, carminative, antispasmodic and analgesic activities [6,7,8,9,10,11] and, among these, the antimicrobial potential is of special interest. In recent years, a large number of researches have reported the efficacy of essential oils from several Origanum species against a panel of bacterial strains [12,13,14,15], and Başer et al. identified carvacrol as the main responsible for this biological activity [16].

In this context, and in view of a possible use of a possible use of oregano oils as antimicrobial herbal medicines, it is important to consider that the essential oil yield and composition are the result of different factors [5], including genotype [17], environment [18], developmental stage [19] and cultural practices [20,21,22].

Interestingly, Halva [23] and Piccaglia [24] have analyzed Anethum and Lavandula species, respectively, and reported that essential oil yields and composition are affected by spatial plant distribution and density of plantation, factors that are supposed to have impact on plant growth and light interception. Conversely, some research conducted in Sicily (Italy) compared different plant densities for O. vulgare L. subsp. hirtum (Link) Ietswaart, and did not indicate significant differences in the yield and composition of the essential oils [25].

The aim of the present research was to investigate growth, essential oil production and chemical composition of a crop of pink flowered oregano (Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare L.) under different plant spatial distribution scenarios (binate and single rows). Moreover, the antimicrobial activity of the essential oil in relation to the chemical composition was investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results of Field Experiment

This research started at the beginning of 2007 on plants of Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare L. (sin. O. vulgare L.) coming from a commercial nursery after three years from the transplantation on a deep clay sandy soil. The thermo-precipitation trends during the period of the experiment in 2007 showed minimum temperatures always above 0 °C. As for the maximum temperatures, the values reached 30 °C during the last ten days of June and maintained this pattern until the last week of August. Rainfall totaled 212 mm during the winter period, 88 mm during the spring and was absent during the months of July and August. This thermo-precipitation tendency implied that watering was only required in the second decade of May.

The growth parameters measured during the field experiments are reported in Table 1. As expected, the growth of oregano was influenced by the spatial distribution of the plants. The height of vegetation was higher in the binate row until the beginning of the bloom, probably due to the competition among the plants in the bine. The data about the width of the vegetation showed that the plants allowed very early the full covering of the soil in the single rows distanced 40 cm. On the contrary, in the other treatment, the vegetation didn’t cover completely the soil also at the stage of maximum growth due to the high distance between the bine (120 cm). Anyway, the PAR absorbance on the row reached the maximum value at the beginning of the bloom in both treatments and this showed a high efficiency of the vegetation in the interception of the radiation. The values of the fresh biomass per plant were higher for the binate treatment and this can be explained on the basis of the greater available space for every plant. On the contrary, the values of fresh biomass per m2 were always higher in the single row treatment. Thus, we can assume that the greatest fresh biomass per plant in the binate row treatment was not sufficient to recover from the lower number of plants per m2.

Table 1.

Results related to the parameters measured during the growth of oregano in the field experiment.

Measured parameters Rows Biological phases
Growth (April 19th) Bloom beg. (May 24th) Full bloom (June 18th)
Vegetation height (cm) single 14.2 b 53.8 b 84.2 a
binate 18.3 a 62.4 a 75.6 a
Row width single 44.8 b 46.2 b 45.6 b
(cm) binate 70.7 a 109.5 a 106.6 a
PAR absorbance single 26 b 100 a 96 b
(%) binate 18 a 100 a 98 a
Fresh biomass single 192 b 422 b 569 b
(g per plant) binate 289 a 662 a 696 a
Fresh biomass single 963 a 2111 a 2846 a
(g m−2) binate 830 b 1921 b 2020 b
Essential oil single 0.007 a 0.018 a 0.030a b
(% fresh biomass) binate 0.009 a 0.012 a 0.051a a
Open in a new tab

a = sample of essential oil submitted to chemical analysis. Equal letters pointed out equal values per p ≥ 0.05 at LSD test.

The essential oil/fresh biomass ratios were in full agreement with those already reported for these species and increased during the biological cycle, reaching the maximum values at the full bloom [26,27]. The values were higher for the binate row treatment only at the full bloom and this can be explained by the high ability of the vegetation to intercept the PAR in both treatments, as previously pointed out. Moreover, we can suppose that the conditions of the growth which led to the greater biomass per plant in the binate treatment contributed to increase the essential oil percentage, given the significant correlation between the biomass/plant ratio and the essential oil percentage (0.7*). Similar behavior was detected for the oil percentage obtained from the air dried samples; in fact, the value was higher for the binate treatment compared to the single row (0.18% and 0.13% respectively; LSD at p ≥ 5% = 0.003).

2.2. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil

The composition of essential oils obtained from plants subjected to two different treatments of cultivation and collected at full bloom is shown in Table 2, were they are listed in order of elution on the HP 5MS column and with the components grouped by biogenetic classes of compounds. Overall, 120 compounds representing 90.4%–93.9% of the oil were identified by GC and GC/MS. Although the total content of monoterpene hydrocarbons is similar for the matrices both in the fresh and in the dry state, there are differences in the content of individual components. Indeed, the oil from plants grown on single rows is rich in sabinene, while that from plants grown in double rows is richer in ocimenes. As for the oxygenated monoterpenes, terpinen-4-ol is the most abundant component. The total content in sesquiterpene hydrocarbons is higher in oils obtained from fresh matrices, and among them the most abundant are β-caryophyllene, germacrene D and α-humulene. Among the oxygenated sesquiterpenes, spathulenol is the most abundant in all oils and its content is greater in the dried samples. As for the phenol content, carvacrol is the main constituent and its concentration increases in the dry matrix. The structures of the main constituents of the essential oils are reported in Figure 1.

Table 2.

Chemical composition of the essential oils from Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare L. samples at full bloom.

Essential oil samples Plant disposal Single row Binate row
Oregano biomass Fresh Dried Fresh Dried
RI a RI b Component Id. c 1% d % 2 d % 3 d % 4 d
Monoterpene hydrocarbons 18.1 14.0 19.4 16.7
931 1023 α-Thujene 1, 2 0.2 0.2 t 0.3
938 1032 α-Pinene 1, 2, 3 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.4
973 1132 Sabinene 1, 2 9.1 4.8 2.5 3.2
993 1174 Myrcene 1, 2, 3 0.5 0.7 1.2 0.6
1001 1146 δ2-Carene 1, 2 0.3 0.5 0.2 1.1
1005 1150 α-Phellandrene 1, 2, 3 0.5
1012 1189 α-Terpinene 1, 2, 3 t
1020 1187 o-Cymene 1, 2 0.2
1025 1278 p-Cymene 1, 2, 3 3.9 3.8 3.3 4.1
1029 1218 β-Phellandrene 1, 2 0.7
1030 1203 Limonene 1, 2, 3 0.8
1038 1245 (Z)-β-Ocimene 1, 2 0.8 0.8 4.0 1.9
1049 1262 (E)-β-Ocimene 1, 2 0.9 0.8 3.1 1.5
1057 1256 γ-Terpinene 1, 2, 3 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.5
1086 1265 Terpinolene 1, 2, 3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4
1129 1386 allo-Ocimene 1, 2 1.1 1.1 4.0 0.6
Oxygenated monoterpenes 7.2 15.5 3.9 17.6
1034 1213 1,8-Cineole 1, 2, 3 0.6 3.9 2.6
1059 1555 (Z)-Sabinyl acetate 1, 2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.6
1076 1450 (Z)-Linalool oxide (furanoid) 1, 2 0.1 t 0.3
1093 1474 trans-Sabinene hydrate 1, 2 0.1 0.2 t 0.7
1098 1553 Linalool 1, 2, 3 0.7 0.9 0.8 2.0
1117 1571 trans-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol 1, 2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.6
1128 1638 cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol 1, 2 t 0.4 0.6
1141 1684 trans-Verbenol 1, 2 0.1
1145 1532 Camphor 1, 2, 3 t
1155 1652 Sabina ketone 1, 2 0.3 0.5
1167 1719 Borneol 1, 2, 3 0.2 0.1 0.4
1175 1583 cis-Isopulegone 1, 2 0.4 t 0.3 0.2
1176 1611 Terpinen-4-ol 1, 2, 3 3.5 5.6 1.9 5.0
1183 1758 cis-Piperitol 1, 2 0.1 0.1
1189 1706 α-Terpineol 1, 2, 3 0.9 2.3 0.6 2.3
1193 1648 Myrtenal 1, 2 0.1
1196 1804 Myrtenol 1, 2 0.2 0.3
1207 1689 trans-Piperitol 1, 2 0.1 0.1 0.2
1218 1802 Cuminaldehyde 1, 2 0.2
1238 1662 Pulegone 1, 2 0.1 0.8
1242 1752 Carvone 1, 2 0.2 t
1265 1680 cis-Piperitone oxide 1, 2 0.1
1275 1744 Phellandral 1, 2 0.1 0.1
1288 2113 Cumin alcohol 1, 2 0.1 0.2
1315 2073 p-Mentha-1,4-dien-7-ol 1, 2 0.1
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons 34.2 22.9 43.9 16.5
1339 1494 Bicycloelemene 1, 2 0.2 0.5 1.8 0.5
1348 1466 α-Cubebene 1, 2 0.1 0.1 0.2
1377 1497 α-Copaene 1, 2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.9
1382 1547 β-Cubebene 1, 2 0.2
1385 1535 β-Bourbonene 1, 2 0.7 1.5 1.1 1.0
1387 1600 β-Elemene 1, 2 0.6 0.3 0,8 0.2
1408 1529 α-Gurjunene 1, 2 0.1 0.1
1415 1612 β-Caryophyllene 1, 2, 3 15.6 8.8 17.2 5.3
1432 1612 β-Gurjunene 1, 2 0.3
1432 1650 γ-Elemene 1, 2 1.3
1398 1685 α-Elemene 1, 2 t
1437 1628 Aromadendrene 1, 2 0.1 0.1
1438 1573 trans-α-Bergamotene 1, 2 1.7 0.3
1452 1673 (E)-β-Farnesene 1, 2 t
1455 1689 α-Humulene 1, 2 2.1 1.1 2.8 0.8
1463 1667 allo-Aromadendrene 1, 2 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.7
1477 1726 Germacrene D 1, 2 4.5 3.3 9.8 2.1
1478 1679 α-Amorphene 1, 2 t
1478 1704 γ-Muurolene 1, 2 0.4 0.4 0.8
1483 1784 ar-Curcumene 1, 2 t
1489 1734 epi-Bicyclosesquiphellandrene 1, 2 1.0 0.8 1.9 0.7
1490 1694 cis β-Guajene 1, 2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
1492 1756 Bicyclogermacrene 1, 2 0.8 2.9 0.1
1494 1740 Valencene 1, 2 t
1503 1740 α-Muurolene 1, 2 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.7
1506 1758 (E,E)-α-Farnesene 1, 2 2.6 0.3 0.6
1510 1743 β-Bisabolene 1, 2 0.7 0.2
1515 1776 γ-Cadinene 1, 2 1.4 1.3 0.5
1519 1839 1-S-cis-Calamenene 1, 2 t
1526 1773 δ-Cadinene 1, 2 2.4 1.7 0.2 1.0
1532 1745 α-Cadinene 1, 2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1
1541 1918 α-Calacorene 1, 2 0.1 0.1
1544 1854 Germacrene B 1, 2 0.7
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes 16.7 24.9 20.6 20.0
1520 2048 endo-1-Bourbonanol 1, 2 0.2 0.3
1553 2076 cis-α-Copaen-8-ol 1, 2 0.4
1565 2057 Ledol 1, 2 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.6
1575 2069 Germacrene D 4-ol 1, 2 t t
1577 2150 Spathulenol 1, 2, 3 6.1 18.6 5.3 9.4
1579 2008 Caryophyllene oxide 1, 2, 3 0.2 1.4 1.1 2.9
1587 2098 Globulol 1, 2 0.8 1.0 1.0
1591 2104 Viridiflorol 1, 2 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.6
1621 2324 Caryophylladienol II 1, 2 0.4
1636 2183 γ-Eudesmol 1, 2 5.0 6.7 1.0
1638 2316 Caryophylladienol I 1, 2 0.6
1640 2158 t-Cadinol 1, 2 1.0 0.7 2.1 0.8
1642 2209 t-Muurolol 1, 2 1.6 3.2 0.6
1645 2208 Torreyol 1, 2 0.7 0.4
1650 allo-Aromadendrene oxide I 1, 2 0.4
1652 2255 α-Cadinol 1, 2 1.7 2.0
Phenols 1.4 12.5 0.2 16.6
1239 1609 Thymol methyl ether 1, 2, 3 t 0.3
1245 1975 Carvacrol methyl ether 1, 2, 3 0.2 0.9
1293 2198 Thymol 1, 2, 3 0.5 0.1 1.1
1299 2239 Carvacrol 1, 2, 3 1.4 11.7 0.1 14.3
1353 2186 Eugenol 1, 2, 3 0.1
Carbonylic compounds 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.6
975 1312 1-Octen-3-one 1, 2 0.1 0.5 0.3
1085 1690 Cryptone 1, 2 t 0.1
1395 1969 cis-Jasmone 1, 2 0.1
1482 1958 (E)-β-Ionone 1, 2, 3 0.2
1835 2131 Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone 1, 2 0.1 t 0.2
Hydrocarbons 14.5 1.2 0.8 3.5
800 800 Octane 1, 2, 3 t
2100 2100 Heneicosane 1, 2, 3 0.2
2200 2200 Docosane 1, 2, 3 0.1 t
2300 2300 Tricosane 1, 2, 3 0.4 0.2
2400 2400 Tetracosane 1, 2, 3 0.4 0.1 t 0.2
2500 2500 Pentacosane 1, 2, 3 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.4
2600 2600 Hexacosane 1, 2, 3 1.1 0.1 t 0.2
2700 2700 Heptacosane 1, 2, 3 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.5
2800 2800 Octacosane 1, 2, 3 1.7 0.1 0.1 0.4
2900 2900 Nonacosane 1, 2, 3 2.5 0.2 0.2 0.5
3000 3000 Triacontane 1, 2, 3 2.2 t 0.1 0.4
3100 3100 Entriacontane 1, 2, 3 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.4
3200 3200 Dotriacontane 1, 2, 3 1.1 t t 0.2
3300 Tritriacontane 1, 2 0.5 0.1 t 0.1
3400 Tetratriacontane 1, 2 0.2 t
3500 Pentatriacontane 1, 2 0.1 t
Others 1.0 2.5 1.1 1.7
980 1454 1-Octen-3-ol 1, 2, 3 0.4 1.3 0.4 1.2
992 1394 Octan-3-ol 1, 2, 3 0.1 0.3
1286 1485 Dihydroedulan II 1, 2 0.3 0.9 0.4 0.5
1950 2622 (Z)-Phytol 1, 2 0.2 0.3 T
1957 2931 Hexadecanoic acid 1, 2, 3 t
TOTAL 93.2 93.9 90.4 93.2
Open in a new tab

a retention indices relative to C8-C32 n-alkanes on the HP 5MS column; b retention indices relative to C8-C32 n-alkanes on the HP Innowax column; c Identification: 1: retention index identical to literature, 2: comparison of mass spectra with MS libraries, 3: co-injection with authentic compounds; d t: trace, concentration less than 0.05%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Chemical structures of the main constituents of Origanum vulgare essential oils.

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity

Table 3 reports the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bacterial Concentration MBC values of the essential oils against ten Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial strains, selected among those known to cause respiratory, gastrointestinal, skin and urinary disorders in humans.

Table 3.

MIC and MBC* values (µg/mL) of essential oils from Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare L. at full bloom and MIC of reference antibiotic.

Bacterial strain Oregano essential oil samples G
Single row Binate row
Fresh (1) Dried (2) Fresh (3) Dried (4)
Bacillus cereus
ATCC 11778		 50 (100) 50 50 (100) 50 1.56
Bacillus subtilis
ATCC 6633		 50 (100) 50 50 (100) 50 1.56
Staphylococcus aureus
ATCC 2592		 50 (100) 50 (100) 100 50 (100) 3.12
Staphylococcus epidermidis
ATCC 12228		 50 (100) 50 (100) 100 50 (100) 6.25
Streptococcus faecalis
ATTC 29212		 100 50 (100) 100 50 (100) >100
Escherichia coli
ATCC 25922		 100 50 (100) 100 50 (100) 3.12
Proteus mirabilis
ATCC 25933		 100 100 >100 100 100
Proteus vulgaris
ATCC 13315		 >100 100 >100 100 100
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ATCC 27853		 >100 >100 >100 >100 12.5
Salmonella typhi Ty2
ATCC 19430		 >100 >100 >100 >100 >100
Open in a new tab

* MBC values are reported in brackets when different from MIC values; G: Gentamycin.

The essential oils showed mild activity mainly against the Gram-positive pathogens, among which Bacillus cereus and B. subtilis were the most affected. Among Gram-negative bacteria, only E. coli was affected by the oils 2 and 4. The higher activity of oils 2 and 4 compared to that of oils 1 and 3 could be ascribed to the higher content of carvacrol, in agreement with the reported relationship between activity and the presence of some phenolic components, especially thymol and carvacrol [28,29].

3. Experimental

3.1. Field Trial

The research started at the beginning of 2007 on plants of Origanum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare L. (sin. O. vulgare L.) [26] coming from a commercial nursery after three years from the transplantation in the farm of CRAA “Improsta” in a plane area of Southern Italy (Eboli, Salerno) on a deep clay sandy soil having pH 8.3, low in nitrogen, (0.84‰), well provided in P2O5 (38.4 ppm) and rich in K2O (423 ppm).

The experimentation compared two plants distribution: single row (distance of 0.40 m between the rows and 0.50 m between the plants on the row corresponding to 5 plants m−2) and binate row (distance of 1.20 m between the bine and 0.20 m in the bine, 0.50 m between the plants on the row corresponding to 2.9 plants m−2). The distance between the bine was chosen to evaluate the possibility to introduce the mechanical control of weeds. For each scheme four rows of 15 m long were considered as replications. The area was equipped with a drop irrigation system which was used to facilitate the transplanting of the oregano plants and to ensure their normal growth in times of drought. Every year the plants were fertilized with 40 units of nitrogen per hectare during the third ten days of March.

The plant growth was analyzed in correspondence of significant phases of the biological cycle by measuring the height of the vegetation and the width of the row until the ground covering with 10 measurements per plot. Moreover, fresh epigeous biomass was determined by collecting samples from a section of 50 cm of the single and binate rows for every replication.

The incoming Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) was measured using a line quantum sensor from Decagon Device Inc. (Pullman, WA, USA) placed perpendicularly to the rows above the canopy (PARi) and at the soil level (PARt); moreover it was placed also face downwards to measure reflectance of the canopy (PARr) and of the soil (PARs). Ten data were collected for every parameter in the central hours of the day and they have been considered representative of the whole day [30]. The data were used to calculate PAR absorbed from the crop [31].

The essential oil content was determined by sampling three representative samples of the fresh epigeous biomass for every determination Data of growth were evaluated by ANOVA and the mean values were separated by LSD at p ≥ 5%.

3.2. Essential Oil Extraction and Analysis

Aliquots (25 g) of samples collected at full bloom both for single and binate rows were finely shredded and then submitted to hydrodistillation for 3 h using n-hexane as solvent and a Clevenger apparatus according to the method recommended in the European Pharmacopoeia [32]. The oils were dehydrated by anhydrous sodium sulfate and kept in a cool (+4 °C) and dark place prior to analysis. In addition, the same samples air dried at room temperature were submitted to hydrodistillation and analyzed.

The oils were analyzed at the Department of Pharmacy of the University of Naples “Federico II. The GC analysis was carried out with a Perkin-Elmer (Perkin-Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA) Sigma 115 gas chromatograph) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and two stationary phases of different polarity: HP-5 MS (30 m length × 0.25 mm internal diameter × 0.25 μm film thickness) or HP Innowax polyethylene glycol capillary column (50 m length × 0.20 mm internal diameter × 0.33 μm film coating) fused silica columns, respectively. Helium was the carrier gas at 1.0 mL min−1. Oven temperature was programmed as follows: initial oven temperature was set at 40 °C (held for 5 min), raised to 250 °C at 2 °C min−1 and held for 5 min and finally increased at 275 °C at 5 °C min−1. Injector and detector temperatures were set at 250 °C and 280 °C, respectively. Diluted samples (1/100 in n-pentane, v/v) of 1.0 μL were injected in the split mode (split ratio 1:100). The analysis was repeated twice for each sample. For GC/MS analysis was used an Agilent 6850 Ser. II apparatus, fitted with a fused silica HP-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d.; 0.25 μm film thickness), coupled to an Agilent Mass Selective Detector MSD 5973; ionization voltage 70 eV; electron multiplier energy 2,000 V. Mass units were monitored from 35 to 450 amu. The same column temperature programme was applied as in GC analysis; injector and detector MS transfer line temperatures were set at 250 °C and 280 °C, respectively. Identification of constituents was made by comparing their relative retention index (Ki) determined with reference to homologous series of n-alkanes (C8-C30) under identical experimental condition in both polar and non-polar columns, with either those of the literature [33,34], co-injection with standards and by matching recorded mass spectra with data published in the literatures [33,35,36] and by comparing them with reference spectra in the computer libraries (NIST 02 and Wiley 275). Quantification was computed by electronic integration of the FID peak areas without corrections for FID response.

3.3. Antimicrobial Assay

The antibacterial activity was evaluated by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) using the broth dilution method [37]. Ten bacteria species, selected as representative of the class of Gram positive and Gram negative, were tested: Bacillus cereus (ATCC 11778), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Streptococcus faecalis (ATTC 29212), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Proteus mirabilis (ATCC 25933), Proteus vulgaris (ATCC 13315), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) and Salmonella typhi Ty2 (ATCC 19430). The strains were maintained on Tryptone Soya agar; for the antimicrobial tests, Tryptone Soya broth was used. In order to facilitate the dispersion of the oils in the aqueous nutrient medium they were diluted with Tween 20 at a ratio of 10%. Each strain was tested with samples that were serially diluted in broth to obtain concentrations ranging from 100 μg/mL to 0.8 μg/mL. The samples were previously sterilized with Millipore filter of 0.45 mm. The samples were stirred, inoculated with 50 μg/mL of physiologic solution containing 5 × 106 microbial cells, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The MIC value was determined as the lowest concentration of the sample that didn’t permit any visible growth of the tested microorganism after incubation. Control containing only Tween 20 instead of the essential oil was not toxic to the microorganisms. As positive controls were used cultures containing only sterile physiologic solution Tris buffer. MBC was determined by subculture of the tubes with inhibition in 5 mL of sterile nutrient broth. After incubation at 37 °C the tubes were observed. When the germs did not grow, the sample denoted a bactericidal action. Oil samples were tested in triplicate. Gentamycin was used as standard antibacterial agent. Sterile distillated water and medium served as a positive growth control.

4. Conclusions

The results reported in this manuscript highlight the influence of different plant distributions on the growth of oregano. In the binate rows treatment, the vegetation didn't completely cover the soil even at the stage of maximum growth due to the high distance between the bine (120 cm) and, consequently, the values of the fresh biomass per plant were higher. On the contrary, the values of fresh biomass/m2 were always higher in the single row treatment because the greatest fresh biomass per plant in the binate row treatment was not sufficient to make up for the lower number of plants/m2. The essential oil percentages on fresh biomass were higher for the binate row treatment only at the full bloom and this can be explained by the high ability of the vegetation to intercept the PAR in both treatments. Moreover, the conditions of growth leading to a greater biomass/plant in the binate treatment contributed also to increase the essential oil percentage.

The essential oil content of fresh biomass is influenced by the conditions of plant growth and it increases during the biological cycle, reaching the maximum values at the full bloom. The oils extracted from matrices, collected in this stage and air dried, contained a fairly good amount of phenols and other components, exerting antibacterial activity. This finding confirms the interest of these plants for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications and the results of the present study could provide useful information to better exploit oregano plants for these purposes.

Acknowledgments

The GC-MS spectra were performed at the "C.S.I.A.S." of the University of Naples "Federico II". The assistance of the staff is gratefully appreciated. Research conducted with the partial contribution of C.R.A.A. Project “Aromatic plants”, Scientific responsible Vincenzo De Feo, University of Salerno.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds identified with number 3 in the Identification column, Table 2, are available from the authors.

References and Notes

  • 1.De Feo V., de Falco E., Nicolella E., Roscigno G. First observation on a collection of aromatic plants in a plain of the Campania region (Southern Italy) Acta Hort. 2005;723:441–445. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marzi V., Tedone L. Fattori climatici e socio economici nell’evoluzione del paesaggio agrario e forestale in ambiente mediterraneo. Ital. J. Agron. 2006;4(Suppl.):23–30. (in Italian) [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gonzáles-Tejero M.R., Casares-Porcel M., Sánchez-Rojas C.P., Ramiro-Gutiérrez J.M., Molero-Mesa J., Pieroni A., Giusti M.E., Censorii E., de Pasquale C., Della A., et al. Medicinal plants in the Mediterranean area: Synthesis of the results of the project RUBIA. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116:341–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hadjichambis A.C., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi D., Della A., Giusti M.E., de Pasquale C., Lenzarini C., Censorii E., Gonzáles-Tejero M.E., Sánchez-Rojas C.P., Ramiro-Gutierrez J.M., et al. Wild and semi-domesticated food plant consumption in seven circum-Mediterranean areas. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008;5:383–414. doi: 10.1080/09637480701566495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Senatore F., editor. Oli Essenziali: Provenienza, Estrazione ed Analisi Chimica. Mediche Scientifiche Internazionali; Roma, Italy: 2000. pp. 115–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sahin F., Gulluce M., Daferera D., Sokmen A., Polissiou M., Agar G. Biological activities of the essential oils and methanol extract of Origanum vulgare subsp. vulgare in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Food Control. 2004;15:549–557. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2003.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Faleiro L., Miguel G., Gomes S., Costa L., Venâncio F., Teixeira A., Figueiredo C., Barroso J.G., Pedro L.G. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of essential oils isolated from Thymbra capitata L. (Cav.) and Origanum vulgareL. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53:8162–8168. doi: 10.1021/jf0510079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Souza E.L., Stamford T.L.M., Lima E.O., Trajano V.N. Effectiveness of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil to inhibit the growth of food spoiling yeasts. Food Control. 2007;18:409–413. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saraç N., Uğur A., Duru M.E., Varol Ö. Antimicrobial activity, antioxidant activity and chemical composition of Origanum onites L. and Origanum vulgare L. subsp. hirtum (Link) Ietswaart from Mugla (Turkey) Acta Hortic. 2009;826:397–403. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coelho da Costa A., Cavalcanti dos Santos B.E., Santos F.L., Lima E.O. Antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Origanum vulgare L. (Lamiaceae) against bacterial multiresistant strains isolated from nosocomial patients. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2009;19:236–241. doi: 10.1590/S0102-695X2009000200010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tommasi L., Negro C., Miceli A., Mazzotta F. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils from aromatic plants grown in the Mediterranean area. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2009;21:185–189. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2009.9700143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dadalioglu I., Evrendilek G.A. Chemical composition and antibacterial effects of essential oils of Turkish oregano (Origanum minutiflorum), bay laurel (Laurus nobilis), Spanish lavender (Lavandula stoechas L.), and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) on common foodborne pathogens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52:8255–8260. doi: 10.1021/jf049033e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baydar H., Sagdic O., Özkan G., Karadogan T. Antibacterial activity and composition of essential oils from Origanum, Thymbra and Satureja species with commercial importance in Turkey. Food Control. 2004;15:169–172. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00028-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vardar-Ünlü G., Ünlü M., Dönmez E., Vural N. Chemical composition and in vitro antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Origanum minutiflorum O Schwarz & PH Davis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007;87:255–259. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bouhdid S., Skali S.N., Idaomar M., Zhiri A., Baudoux D., Amensour M., Abrini J. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Origanum compactum essential oil. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008;7:1563–1570. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Başer K. Biological and pharmacological activities of carvacrol and carvacrol bearing essential oils. Curr. Pharm. Design. 2008;14:3106–3119. doi: 10.2174/138161208786404227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kokkini S. Taxonomy, diversity and distribution of Origanum species. In: Padulosi S., editor. Proceedings of IPGRI International Workshop on Oregano; Bari, Italy. 8–12 May 1996; Rome, Italy: IPGRI; 1997. pp. 2–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Giuliani C., Maggi F., Papa F., Maleci Bini L. Congruence of phytochemical and morphological profiles along an altitudinal gradient in Origanum vulgare subsp. vulgare from Venetian Region (NE Italy) Chem. Biodivers. 2013;10:569–583. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201300019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berghold H., Wagner S., Mandi M., Thaller A., Muller M., Rakowitz M., Pasteiner S., Boechzelt H. Yield, content and composition of the essential oil of 5 oregano strains (Origanum vulgare L.) depending on the developmental stage. Z. Arznei Gewuerzpfla. 2008;13(1):36–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Azizi A., Yan F., Honermeier B. Herbage yield, essential oil content and composition of three oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) populations as affected by soil moisture regimes and nitrogen supply. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2009;29:554–561. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bernestein N., Chaimovitch D., Dudai N. Effect of irrigation with secondary treated effluent on essential oil, antioxidant activity, and phenolic compounds in oregano and rosemary. Agronomy J. 2009;101:1–10. doi: 10.2134/agronj2007.0144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dordas C. Foliar application of calcium and magnesium improves growth, yield, and essential oil yield of oregano (Origanum vulgare subsp. hirtum) Ind. Crop. Prod. 2009;29:599–608. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Halva S., Craker L.E., Simon J.E., Charles D. Light quality, growth and essential oil in dill (Anethum graveolens L.) J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants. 1992;1:59–69. doi: 10.1300/J044v01n01_07. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Piccaglia R. Aromatic plants: A world of flavouring compost. Agro-Food Ind. Hi-Tech. 1998;9:12–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leto C., Carrubba A., Trapani P. Effetti della densità d’impianto sulla coltivazione dell’origano (Origanum heracleoticum L.) in due ambienti siciliani; Proceedings of Coltivazione e miglioramento di piante officinali; Trento, Italy. 2–3 June, 1994; pp. 569–576. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ietswaart J.H. A Taxonomic Revision of the Genus Origanum (Labiatae) Volume 4. Leiden University Press; The Hague, The Netherlands: 1980. pp. 106–110. (Leiden Botanical Series 4). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marzi V. Agricultural practices or oregano. In: Padulosi S., editor. Proceedings of IPGRI International Workshop on Oregano; Bari, Italy. 8–12 May 1996; Rome, Italy: IPGRI; 1997. pp. 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lambert R.J.W., Skandamis P.N., Coote P., Nychas G.J.E. Study of the minimum inhibitory concentration and mode of action of oregano essential oil, thymol, and carvacrol. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001;91:453–462. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01428.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rhayour K., Bouchikhi T., Tantaoui-Elaraki A., Sendide K., Remmal A. The mechanism of bactericidal action of oregano and clove essential oils and of their phenolic major components. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2003;15:286–292. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2003.9712144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guiducci M., Antognoni A., Benincasa P. Movimento del fogliame, intercettazione ed utilizzazione della luce in colture diverse in funzione della disponibilità idrica. Riv. Agron. 1993;27:392–397. (in Italian) [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ercoli E., Mensuali A., Malorgio F., Serra G. Interception of photosynthetically active radiation, growth and production of bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Agric. Mediterr. 1992;122:215–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.EDQM . European Pharmacopoeia. 5th ed. Council of Europe; Strasbourg, France: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jennings W., Shibamoto T. Qualitative Analysis of Flavour and Fragrance Volatiles by Glass Capillary Gas Chromatography. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA: 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Davies N.W. Gas chromatographic retention indices of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes on methyl silicone and Carbowax 20M phases. J. Chromatogr. 1990;503:1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)81487-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Adams R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy. 4th ed. Allured Publishing Co.; Carol Stream, IL, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.The Mass Spectrometry Data Centre . Eight Peak Index of Mass Spectra. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Nottingham University; Nottingham, UK: 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Barry A. The Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test: Principles and Practices. Lea and Febiger; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1976. p. 180. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES