Abstract
Condensed tannins (CT) from purple prairie clover (PPC; Dalea purpurea Vent.) and sainfoin (SF; Onobrychis viciifolia) were assessed for anti-Escherichia coli activity by comparing their ability to react with proteins and liposome, cause cell aggregation, and alter outer membrane (OM) morphology and permeability. The PPC CT had greater (P < 0.01) protein-precipitating capacity than SF CT using either bovine serum albumin or ribulose 1,5-disphosphate carboxylase as model proteins. Minimum inhibitory concentration of PPC CT for two strains of E. coli and five strains of E. coli O157:H7 was four to six times lower than that of SF CT. E. coli exposed to 10 µg/mL of both CT had higher (P < 0.05) OM permeability than controls and was greater (P < 0.05) for PPC than for SF CT. Addition of both CT at 50 and 200 µg/mL caused cell aggregation which was more evident (P < 0.05) for PPC than for SF CT. Transmission electron microscopy showed electron dense material on the cell surface when cells were exposed to 50 µg/mL of PPC CT. The greater anti-E. coli activity of PPC than SF CT was due to its enhanced ability to precipitate protein that increased OM permeability and promoted cell aggregation.
Keywords: condensed tannins, E. coli, outer membrane, cell aggregation, protein precipitation
1. Introduction
Ruminants are a major reservoir of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7, a food-borne pathogen that costs millions of dollars annually in food processing and health care in North America. Decreasing the level of E. coli O157:H7 in cattle may reduce the contribution of this pathogen to foodborne illness [1,2], but at present there are no effective means to reduce the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in the digestive tracts of cattle [3]. Some plant tannins have been shown to possess anti-E. coli O157:H7 activities and their efficacy depends on the tannin sources [4,5,6].
Purple prairie clover (PPC; Dalea purpurea Vent.) and sainfoin (SF; Onobrychis viciifolia) are legume forages that contain high concentrations (58–94 g/kg DM) of condensed tannins [7,8]. However, condensed tannins (CT) or proanthocyanidins isolated from PPC possess stronger anti-E. coli O157:H7 activity in vitro than CT isolated from SF [6]. The reason why these two CT differ in their inhibition of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 is unknown. Condensed tannins are secondary plant compounds that defend plants against attack from insects and pathogens [9]. Anti-microbial activity of CT against gram-positive bacteria has been reported to be greater than against Gram-negative bacteria [10,11,12]. We have previously identified the cell membrane as the primary site that CT act upon bacteria [5,11]. The reduced activity of CT against Gram-negative bacteria has been attributed to the outer membrane (OM) structure of the bacteria [10,13]. We hypothesize that the ability of CT to inhibit the growth of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 is due to the disruption of OM function. Proteins and lipids are important components of the cell membrane of gram-negative bacteria. Condensed tannins readily form complexes with proteins, with the degree of affinity dependent on their chemical structures [14]. Catechins, the CT monomers in green tea (Camellia sinensis) have been reported to express anti-E. coli activity by damaging the lipid bilayer and increasing OM permeability [10,15]. Other plant bioactives such as essential oil from Melaleuca alternifoli, thymol, eugenol, cinnamaldehyde and phenolic extracts from raspberry (Rubus idaeus, var. Ottawa) and cloudberry (R. chamaemorus) have also been shown to exhibit activity against Gram-negative bacteria by altering OM and lipid composition [16,17,18]. However, the mechanism whereby CT alter membrane function in E. coli is not understood. The objectives of this study were to determine the reactivity of PPC and SF CT with protein and liposome and their minimum inhibitory concentrations against E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 and to assess their effects on the outer cell membrane.
2. Results
2.1. Protein-Precipitating Capacities of PPC and SF CT
Protein precipitation data fitted to the sigmoidal equation y=a0+a/(1+exp(-(x-b)/c)) (R2=0.997±0.002). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was completely precipitated by ≥750 µg of PPC and ≥1,250 µg of SF CT (Figure 1). In contrast, ribulose 1,5-disphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) protein was completely precipitated by ≥500 µg PPC CT, whereas only 73% (2.2/3.0) of Rubisco was precipitated by SF CT at the highest concentration tested (1,500 µg). Condensed tannins from PPC exhibited a greater ability (lower protein-precipitating capacity; PP) to bind both BSA and Rubisco protein (P < 0.001) than SF CT with this response being accentuated for Rubisco (Table 1).
Table 1.
Proteins | Parameters * | PPC | SF | SEM ǂ | P values |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSA | a0+a | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.01 | 0.213 |
b | 258 | 368 | 30.0 | 0.584 | |
c | 176 | 316 | 9.9 | <0.001 | |
PP | 233 | 364 | 9.4 | <0.001 | |
Rubisco | a0+a | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.02 | <0.001 |
b | 335 | 863 | 22.1 | <0.001 | |
c | 50 | 195 | 13.4 | 0.002 | |
PP | 299 | 852 | 16.4 | <0.001 |
* Parameters were obtained by fitting the amount of precipitated protein (mg) and amount of CT (µg) incubated with equation: y = a0+a/(1+exp(-(x-b)/c)), where y = mg of protein (BSA or Rubisco) precipitated , x = µg of CT incubated, a0+a = estimated maximal amount (mg) of protein (BSA or Rubisco) precipitated, b = sigmoidal centre (µg of CT at the 50% of maximal protein precipitation), and c = sigmoidal width; PP: Protein-precipitating capacity; expressed as µg CT required to precipitate 1 mg of protein (N = 12); ǂ SEM, standard error of the mean.
2.2. Reactivity of PPC and SF CT with Liposome
Liposome alone and phosphate buffer containing 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (NPN) with various concentrations of CT had negligible relative fluorescence value (RFV; data not shown). However, addition of NPN to liposome resulted in the highest RFV (0 CT; Table 2). The RFV linearly decreased (P < 0.001) with increasing concentrations of CT from 0 to 200 µg/mL. The RFV of liposome + NPN was reduced (P < 0.01) with the addition of PPC and SF CT, but did not differ between the two sources of CT. Fluorescence microscopy showed that the liposome aggregated upon the addition of both CT (data not shown).
Table 2.
Time | Source | CT concentration (µg/mL) | SEM * | P value (L ǂ) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 10 | 50 | 200 | ||||
10 min | Control | 286 | 5.7 | ||||
PPC | 207 | 184 | 178 | <0.001 | |||
SF | 203 | 195 | 168 | <0.001 | |||
30 min | Control | 257 | 7.8 | ||||
PPC | 198 | 183 | 167 | <0.001 | |||
SF | 191 | 190 | 166 | <0.001 |
* SEM, standard error of the mean; ǂ Linear effect of CT.
2.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the CT
The selected E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 strains had relatively similar sensitivity to both CT. For all strains, PPC CT completely inhibited bacterial growth at the concentrations as low as 20 µg/mL (Table 3). In contrast, the MIC for SF CT was higher, ranging between 100 and 150 µg/mL. Among the selected strains, ATCC 25922, H4420N and E318N varied in their sensitivities to both CT across assays.
Table 3.
Species | Strains | MIC (CT µg/mL) | |
---|---|---|---|
PPC | SF | ||
E. coli | ATCC 25922 | 20–40 | 100–150 |
ATCC 35352 | 20 | 125 | |
E. coli O157:H7 | 3081 | 20 | 100 |
H4420N | 20–50 | 120 | |
E318N | 20–30 | 110 | |
EDL933 | 20 | 120 | |
R508N2006 | 20 | 110 |
2.4. Effects of CT on OM Permeability and Cell Aggregation of E. coli
Pre-culturing E. coli strain 25922 with 10 µg/mL of PPC or SF CT or 0.05 µmol/mL of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) increased (P < 0.01) OM permeability as indicated by the increased RFV as compared to that pre-cultured without CT and EDTA (Control; Figure 2). The two CT sources did not differ in their impacts on OM permeability as indicated by the similar RFV of E. coli pre-cultured with two sources of CT.
Addition of two CT at 50 and 200 µg/mL to E. coli pre-cultured without CT caused cell aggregation as indicated by decreased (P < 0.01) RFV, whereas addition of EDTA at the levels of 0.2, 0.4 and 1.0 µmol/mL to the same E. coli pre-cultured without CT slightly (P = 0.07) increased the RFV (Figure 3). The reduction of RFV by addition of CT was also observed for E. coli pre-cultured with 10 µg/mL of CT (data not shown).
Fluorescence microscopy showed that E. coli pre-cultured without CT were evenly suspended in buffer (Figure 4a), and aggregation was not obvious at 10 µg/mL of PPC CT (Figure 4b) or 10 µg/mL of SF CT (data not shown). However, addition of 50 and 200 µg/mL of PPC and SF CT dramatically increased cell aggregation (Figure 4c, d, e and f), which was more apparent at 200 than at 50 µg/mL (Figure 4d & f vs. c & e) for both CT (Figure 4c & d vs. e & f).
2.5. Morphological Alteration of Cell Membrane
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examination showed that tannins acted primarily on the OM of the bacterial cell (Figure 5).
A continuous OM was observable in bacteria cultured without tannins and with 50 µg/mL of SF CT, although this exposure has slightly thickened this structure. In contrast, cells exposed to PPC CT and phlorotannins isolated from brown seaweed (SW) exhibited electron dense deposits on the cell surface, but cell lysis was not evident. The electron dense deposits caused by CT either continuously surrounded the cell surface (Figure 6b), aggregated into small droplets on the cell surface or within the vicinity of the cell (Figure 6c).
3. Discussion
The four to six times lower MIC for PPC CT compared to that of SF CT (Table 3) indicated that PPC CT possesses stronger anti-E. coli and anti-E. coli O157:H7 activity. This is consistent with our previous findings [6]. However, the reason why these two CT possess different anti-E. coli activities is unknown. This study revealed that different protein-precipitating capacities of the two CT may in part be responsible for their differences in anti-E. coli activity. It needs to be pointed out that fitting data of Rubisco protein precipitation to sigmoidal curve was not as good as that of BSA. The reason for this is unknown; however, the difference between the two CT in their capacities to precipitate Rubisco protein was even larger than to precipitate BSA. Binding and precipitating proteins is a common characteristic of tannins and it is generally proposed to be responsible for their biological activities [14]. The OM of E. coli is rich in protein [19,20]. Consequently, it is not surprising that the CT in our study exhibited a high affinity for the OM of E. coli. McAllister et al. [21] reported that among nine forage CT examined SF CT had the lowest protein-precipitating capacity as well as the lowest activity against the gram-negative rumen bacterium, Fibrobacter succinogenes. Shimamura et al. [22] demonstrated that the antimicrobial activity of tea catechins, a structural component of CT, is mainly attributable to the direct binding to peptides of bacterial origin. It is generally regarded that formation of CT-protein complexes depends on structure and composition of both CT and protein. For a given protein, the number of potential hydrogen and hydrophobic bonding sites on the CT molecules determines the extent of their capacities to bind protein. The number of potential hydrogen bonding sites on a given molecule of CT is a function of the number and type of monomeric subunits (e.g., flavan-3-ols), stereochemistry, and the carbon-carbon linkages between them that create linear and /or branching polymers. The SF CT have been shown a highly complex mixture of varying molecular weights [23,24]. However, there is no information on the chemical structure and composition of PPC CT. Further research in this area is needed to fully understand the anti-E. coli and anti-E. coli O157:H7 activity of PPC CT.
Although tannins are well known for their capacities to prevent peroxidation of lipids there is little information regarding the reactivities of CT with lipids. This study showed that both PPC and SF CT promote aggregation of liposome composed of L-α-phosphatidylcholine (Table 2) as indicated by the decrease of RFV of liposome suspension upon addition of CT. Catechins from green tea have also been reported to cause aggregation of liposomes [10,15]. It has been shown that catechins are less likely to cause aggregation of liposome with a negative surface charge [10]. This may partially contribute to the lower sensitivity of Gram-negative bacteria to tannins than that of Gram-positivebacteria [10]. It is also evident that tannic acids react with choline moieties in phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine [25]. However, the fact that PPC and SF CT aggregated liposome to a similar extent suggests that these two CT have similar reactivity with L-α-phosphatidylcholine. Therefore the contrasting anti-E. coli activities of PPC and SF CT are not likely due to their abilities to react with microbial lipids.
The OM of E. coli consists of a lipid bilayer structure composed of an outer layer of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and proteins and an inner layer composed of phospholipids, which acts as a barrier to hydrophobic antibiotics, bile salts, detergents, proteases, lipases and lysozyme [20]. Measuring NPN uptake by cell is a common method of assessing its OM permeability [10,26]. The increased RFV observed for E. coli cultured with 10 µg/mL of CT (Figure 2) indicates that these phenolics at this concentration increased the OM permeability of E. coli. The results that PPC CT increased OM permeability and inhibited E. coli to a greater extent than SF CT suggest that the alteration of OM permeability contributed to anti-E. coli properties of CT. Increased OM permeability has been reported for other antimicrobials including essential oils [27], chitosan [28], citric acid [29] and peptides [26]. It is possible that the reaction of CT with protein and phospholipid in OM disrupted the integrity of this structure in a manner that increased its permeability. EDTA, a divalent cation chelator, is regarded as a potent OM permeabilizer [30]. Therefore, the concomitant increase in OM permeability by both EDTA and CTs used in this study may indicate that the enhanced OM permeability by CT may have also involved the chelation of cations, a possibility that is supported by the fact that chelating of metal ions has been shown to be one of the antimicrobial properties of tannins [31].
The decreased RFV of cell suspension upon addition of 50 and 200 µg/mL CT (Figure 3) is likely a reflection of cell aggregation rather than a decrease in OM permeability. This is supported by the results from fluorescence imaging analysis of this study (Figure 4a). Others have shown that tannins cause aggregation by increasing hydrophobicity of the cell surface [32,33], a response that has also been reported for catechins [10,15]. In contrast, increasing concentrations of EDTA increased RFV (Figure 4b), which is consistent with an increasing affinity for membrane cations. Therefore, at high concentrations of CT, the NPN assay may underestimate the impact of CT on OM permeability due to increased cell aggregation.
The electron dense deposits on the cell surface observed within the E. coli treated with PPC CT and phlorotannins (Figure 5) are likely complexes of tannins with protein and lipids of the OM especially those contained in outer leaflet since this study showed PPC CT precipitated and aggregated both protein and liposome. It is known that some of the proteins produced within plasma are translocated across OM as extracellular proteins [19] and E. coli secrete OM micro-vesicles that are composed of protein, lipids and LPS similar to OM [34]. Therefore, PPC CT may also react with them to form the electron dense deposits on the cell surface as well as in the medium. These observations clearly demonstrated that tannins primarily act on OM, and that the greater anti-E. coli activity of PPC CT is associated with their greater capacities to perturb OM function by reacting with proteins than that of SF CT. The OM has been implicated in conjugation between bacterial cells as well as in the adhesion mechanism between bacteria and their host organism. In this regards, the disruption of the OM structure and function by CT may affect bacterial colonization capacity. Research is needed in this area.
4. Experimental
4.1. Isolation and Purification of PPC and SF CT
Condensed tannins from PPC and SF were extracted and purified as described by Wang et al. [5]. Purified CT were stored in a sealed amber glass bottle at −20 °C and the same batch of each CT was used for all experiments in this study. The CT solutions were freshly prepared by dissolving CT into sterilized distilled water for each assay immediately prior to use.
4.2. Determination of the Protein-Precipitating Capacities of PPC and SF CT
The protein-precipitating capacities of PPC and SF CT were determined using a modification of the procedure described by McAllister et al. [21]. Bovine serum albumin and ribulose 1,5-disphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco; MW 557 kDa) E.C. 4.1.1.39 isolated from spinach (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as model proteins. The BSA was dissolved (3 mg/mL) in 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH = 5.0) containing 0.17 M NaCl, and the Rubisco was dissolved (4 mg/mL) in 1 M 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol hydrochloride (Tris HCl; pH = 7.8). One milliliter of either protein solution was combined with 0.5 mL of aqueous solutions containing 0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 1250 or 1500 µg of CT from each source. Each mixture was vortexed, allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min, then centrifuged (15,600 × g, 10 min). A subsample (1.0 mL) of the supernatant was then added to 0.5-mL of aqueous polyethylene glycol (Sigma, MW 3,350; 12 mg/mL), vortexed and centrifuged (15,600 × g; 10 min) after standing at room temperature for 30 min. Protein remaining in solution was quantified colorimetrically using a Dye Reagent Concentrate Kit II (Catalog number 500-0002; BioRad Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada) and compared to an original freshly prepared solution of BSA or Rubisco. Each assay consisted of nine replicates for each dose of CT and the assay was repeated three times over a 1-week period.
4.3. Determination of Reactivity of PPC and SF CT with Liposome
The reactivity of both CT with liposome was assessed by determining their capacities in causing liposome aggregation. L-α-phosphatidylcholine (MW 768.1) from egg yolk (Sigma; ≥99%) was used as model liposome. Liposome was first dissolved into chloroform (Aldrich Chemical, USA), then dried under N2 gas at room temperature and the residue was subsequently re-suspended into phosphate buffer (0.2 mM, pH = 7.2) stock solution to a concentration of 7.5 µmol/mL. Four stock suspensions were prepared for each determination.
The assay procedure was similar to that described by Ikigai et al. [10] to determine CT-caused liposome aggregation by measuring quenching of 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (NPN; Sigma-Aldrich) fluorescence by addition of CT. The NPN is an uncharged lipophilic dye with weak fluorescence in aqueous environments but exhibits enhanced fluorescence in nonpolar or hydrophobic environments such as liposome. The assay was conducted with black fluorotitre microplates (COSTAR®, Corning, NY, USA), and fluorescence was measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Multi-Reader, Thermo, Appliskan, Vantaa, Finland). Excitation and emission wavelengths were set at 355 and 420 nm, respectively. Briefly, liposome suspension (3.0 mL) and 1.0 mM NPN solution (3.0 µL) were mixed in 15-mL glass tubes, and then 190 µL of the mixture was transferred into black fluorotitre microplate well to which 10 µL of each CT solution was added (final CT concentration 0, 10, 50 or 200 µg/mL). In addition, two sets of glass tubes, one with 3.0 mL of liposome suspension plus 3.0 µL of phosphate buffer and another one with 3.0 mL of phosphate buffer plus 3.0 µL of NPN solution (final NPN concentration 1.0 µM) and 10 µL of each respective CT solution (final CT concentration 0, 10, 50 and 200 µg/mL) were prepared in parallel to estimate background fluorescence. A total of four replicates were conducted for each sample and the experiment was repeated three times with freshly prepared liposome suspensions. The effect of CT on liposome aggregation was assessed by comparing the RFV of liposome suspensions with different CT concentrations. In addition, the aggregation of liposome caused by the PPC and SF CT was also visually observed and photographed using LIVE/DEAD® BacLight Bacterial Viability kit (L7007, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and fluorescence microscopy.
4.4. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of CT
4.4.1. Pre-incubation of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7
Two generic E. coli strains (ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35352) and five E. coli O157:H7 strains (3081, H4420N, E318N, EDL933 and R508N2006) were used in this experiment. Bacteria were grown to log phase in 50 mL of M9 medium (M9 Minimal Salts, Sigma) at 37 °C for 10 h. The culture was then centrifuged (7,000 × g, 10 min), washed with 5 mL of sterilized 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution, centrifuged (7,000 × g, 10 min) and the bacterial pellet was re- suspended in 0.9% NaCl solution. The suspension was subsequently adjusted to OD420 of 1.0. Seven bacterial suspensions were prepared from three independent cultures.
4.4.2. Determination of MIC
The procedure was modified from method described by Rahman et al. [35]. Briefly, pre-cultured E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 were diluted with M9 medium to 105 colony forming unit/mL. The bacterial inoculum was then transferred (180 µL) into a 96-well microplate (NUNC TM, Kamstrupvej, Roskilde, Denmark), followed by addition of 10 µL of freshly prepared CT solutions to yield final CT concentrations used in the assays, and 10 µL of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (Sigma) as bacterial growth indicator (final concentration 25 µg/mL). Wells with live bacteria could be identified by the presence of a red deposit in the bottom of the incubation well. Preliminary tests showed no bacterial growth at concentrations of CT > 300 µg/mL. Therefore, MIC was determined over a range of concentrations from 0 to 300 µg/mL at 10 µg/mL intervals. Four replicate wells were prepared for each concentration of CT. Plates were incubated aerobically with horizontally shaking (120 rpm) at 37 °C for 12 h and visually examined for red deposit. The lowest concentration of CT that showed no red deposit at the bottom of incubation well was defined as the MIC. The experiment was repeated three times over two-week period.
4.5. Determination of the Effects of CT on OM Permeability and Cell Aggregation of E. coli
Since the MIC of both CT were similar across all strains of E. coli the model strain ATCC25922 [36,37,38] was used for subsequent experiments.
4.5.1. Pre-culturing and Preparation of Bacterial Suspension
The bacteria were aerobically cultured (duplicate flasks) in M9 media containing 0 or 10 µg/mL of each CT at 37 °C for 10 h using the same procedure as in Section 4.4.1. The sub-lethal concentration of 10 µg/mL used in the pre-incubation was based on the MIC of PPC tannin (25–50% of MIC). In addition, bacteria was also aerobically cultured in two flasks with M9 media containing 0.05 µmol/mL of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; Sigma) in the same manner as above for comparison since EDTA is a commonly used membrane permeabilizer. The bacterial cells suspensions that were used for the OM permeability were prepared in the same manner as described in Section 4.4.1, but using phosphate buffer. The bacterial suspensions were sampled and enumerated by dilution plating as described by Bach et al. [39].
4.5.2. OM Permeability Assays
The OM permeability of E. coil prepared above was determined using a NPN uptake assay as described by Ikigai et al. [10]. The assay was conducted with black fluorotitre microplates (COSTAR®) with fluorescence being measured at 10 and 20 min after addition of NPN. Fluorescence of bacterial suspensions and phosphate buffer with NPN were also measured separately at the same time to estimate background fluorescence. The effect of CT on the OM permeability of E. coli was assessed by comparing the relative fluorescence value (RFV) of the two bacterial suspensions (with and without CT during pre-incubation).
4.5.3. Determination of Cell Aggregation by CT
4.5.3.1. NPN Fluorescence Quenching Assay
Preliminary tests showed that the fluorescence intensity of mixture of bacterial cells suspension and NPN was decreased by addition of CT due to the aggregation of the cells. Therefore, the NPN assay described above was modified as described by Ikigai et al. [10] to estimate cell aggregation by measuring quenching of NPN fluorescence by CT. Briefly, 190 µL of bacterial suspension (pre-cultured without CT) as described above was transferred into wells of black fluorotitre microplates, and background fluorescence was measured. Ten µL of NPN (final concentration 10 µM) was then added to each well and fluorescence was measured. Freshly prepared CT solutions (10 µL) or EDTA (10 µL) were added to each well so as to result in a final concentration of 0, 50 or 200 µg/mL of CT or 0, 0.2, 0.4 or 1.0 µmol/mL of EDTA in respective wells. Fluorescence within each well was measured 10 min after CT and EDTA addition. Each assay was performed three times with three independent bacterial suspensions. Background fluorescence of the buffer + NPN and bacterial suspension were subtracted from the final fluorescence values.
4.5.3.2. Fluorescence Imaging Analysis
The cell aggregation caused by CT was also examined using nucleic acid probes SYTO9 in the LIVE/DEAD® BacLight Bacterial Viability kit (L7007, Molecular Probes) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [40]. SYTO9 stains all bacterial cells with green fluorescence. The assay procedure was similar to that for NPN fluorescence quenching assay described above, but the 10 µL of NPN was replaced with 1 µL of the SYTO9. The stained bacterial suspension (5 µL) was transferred onto glass slide 10 min after the addition of CT. The sample was covered with a coverslip and observed using Fluorescent Microscope2420A (2420A; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
4.6. Transmission Electron Microscopy Examination of Morphological Alteration of Cell Membrane
E. coli strain 25922 was incubated in M9 medium without CT (Control) or with 50 μg/mL of PPC or SF CT. Procedures for bacterial culture, inoculation and addition of CT into the culture were the same as described in Section 4.5.1. Phlorotannins isolated from brown seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) using a procedure described by Wang et al. [5] was included at the concentration of 25 µg/mL as positive control. The phlorotannins at this concentration have previously been shown to inhibit the growth of E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 and to affect their cell membrane structures [5]. Triplicate cultures were prepared for each tannins. After 12-h incubation, bacterial cells were harvested, processed and examined by TEM as described by Bae et al. [41] using an H-500 Hitachi TEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
4.7. Data Calculations and Statistical Analysis
Amount of protein precipitated in experiment determining protein-precipitating capacities of PPC and SF CT was calculated as the difference between added protein and that present in the supernatant after CT addition. Data were fitted to a sigmoidal curve using nonlinear regression in Slidewrite Plus for Windows (version 7.01; Advanced Graphics Software, Inc., Rancho Santa Fe, CA, USA):
y=a0+a/(1+exp(-(x-b)/c)) |
where y = mg of protein (BSA or Rubisco) precipitated, x = µg of CT incubated, a0+a = estimated maximum amount (mg) of protein (BSA or Rubisco) precipitated, b = sigmoidal centre (mg of CT at the 50% of maximal protein precipitation), and c = sigmoidal width. The protein-precipitating capacity (PP) of each CT was expressed as the amount (µg) of the CT required to precipitate 1.0 mg of BSA or Rubisco protein.
The RFV obtained in experiments determining reactivity of PPC and SF CT with liposome, and effects of CT on OM permeability and cell aggregation of E. coli was calculated as the actual fluorescence value divided by 100 [27].
Data, except for that of MIC and TEM, were statistically analyzed by the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS, Cary, NC, USA, 2009). Different CT at different concentrations in experiments other than MIC determination and TEM observation were arranged as completely random design. Replicates within each assay and replicate assays were considered random factors. Differences among treatments were tested using LSMEANS with the PDIFF option and adjusted by the Tukey’s test.
5. Conclusions
Condensed tannins from PPC possess greater antimicrobial activity against E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 than CT from SF. The greater anti-E. coli and anti-E. coli O157:H7 activity of PPC CT is attributed to their greater capacities to precipitate protein and cause cell aggregation. These properties lead to destabilization of OM structure and permeability.
Acknowledgments
This study was partially funded from Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and peer-reviewed program of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC). X. L. Liu acknowledges the China Scholarship Council for awarding scholarship to conduct this research at Lethbridge Research Centre (LRC) of AAFC. The authors thank K. Munns for technical assistance. This is LRC contribution number 387-12035.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Sample Availability: Samples of the PPC CT and SF CT are available from the authors.
References
- 1.Elder R.O., Keen J.E., Siragusa G.R., Barkocy-Gallagher G.A., Koohmaraie M., Laegreid W.W. Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 prevalence in feces, hides, and carcasses of beef cattle during processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:2999–3003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.060024897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stanford K., McAllister T.A., Niu D.Y., Stephens T.P., Mazzocco A., Waddell T.E., Johnson R.P. Oral delivery systems for encapsulated bacteriophages targeted at Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feedlot cattle. J. Food Prot. 2010;73:1304–1312. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.7.1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Callaway T.R., Carr M.A., Edrington T.S., Anderson R.C., Nisbet D.J. Diet, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and cattle: A review after 10 years. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2009;11:67–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Min B.R., Pinchak W.E., Anderson R.C., Callaway T.R. Effect of tannins on the in vitro growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and in vivo growth of generic Escherichia coli excreted from steers. J. Food. Prot. 2007;70:543–550. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.3.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang Y., Xu Z., Bach S.B., McAllister T.A. Sensitivity of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) phlorotannins and terrestrial tannins. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;22:238–245. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang Y., Jin L., Ominski K.H., He M., Xu Z., Krause D.O., Acharya S.N., Wittenberg K.M., Liu X.L., Stanford K., McAllister T.A. Screening of condensed tannins from Canadian Prairie forages for anti-Escherichia coli O157:H7 with an emphasis on purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent) J. Food Prot. 2013 doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-259. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berard N.C., Wang Y., Wittenberg K.M., Krause D.O., Coulman D.E., McAllister T.A., Ominski K.H. Condensed tannin concentrations found in vegetative and mature forage legumes grown in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2011;91:669–675. doi: 10.4141/cjps10153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jin L., Wang Y., Iwaasa A.D., Xu Z., Schellenberg M.P., Zhang Y.G., Liu X.L., McAllister T.A. Effect of condensed tannins on ruminal degradability of purple prairie clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) harvested at two growth stages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012;176:17–25. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haslam E. Plant polyphenols (syn. vegetable tannins) and chemical defence-a reappraisal. J. Chem. Ecol. 1988;14:1789–1805. doi: 10.1007/BF01013477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ikigai H., Nakae T., Hara Y., Shimamura T. Bactericidal catechins damage the lipid bilayer. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1993;1147:132–136. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(93)90323-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jones G.A., McAllister T.A., Muir A., Cheng K.J. Effects of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia scop) condensed tannins on growth and proteolysis by four strains of ruminal bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60:1374–1378. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.4.1374-1378.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Min B.R., Attwood G.T., McNabb W.C., Molan A.L., Barry T.N. The effect of condensed tannins from Lotus corniculatus on the proteolytic activities and growth of rumen bacteria. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005;121:45–48. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Min B.R., Pinchak W.E., Merkel R., Walker S., Tomita G., Anderson R.C. Comparative antimicrobial activity of tannin extracts from perennial plants on mastitis pathogens. Sci. Res. Essays. 2008;3:66–73. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haslam E. Plant Polyphenols, Vegetable Tannins Revisited. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tsuchiya H. Stereospecificity in membrane effects of catechins. Chem-Biol. Interact. 2001;134:41–54. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2797(00)00308-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cox S.D., Mann C.M., Markham J.L., Gustafson J.E., Warmington J.R., Wyllie S.G. Determining the antimicrobial actions of tea tree oil. Molecules. 2001;6:87–91. doi: 10.3390/60100087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nohynek L.J., Alakomi H.L., Kähkönen M.P., Heinonen M., Helander I.M., Oksman-Caldentey K.M., Puupponen-Pimiä R.H. Berry phenolics, antimicrobial properties and mechanisms of action against severe human pathogens. Nutr. Cancer. 2006;54:18–32. doi: 10.1207/s15327914nc5401_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pasqua R.D., Betts G., Hoskins N., Edwards M., Ercolini D., Mauriello G. Membrane toxicity of antimicrobial compounds from essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007;55:4863–4870. doi: 10.1021/jf0636465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nikaido H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003;67:593–656. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cohen G.N. Microbial Biochemistry. 2nd. Dordrecht, Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 21.McAllister T.A., Martinez T., Bae H.D., Muir A.D., Yanke L.J., Jones G.A. Characterization of condensed tannins purified from legume forages, chromophore production, protein precipitation, and inhibitory effects on cellulose digestion. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005;31:2049–2068. doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-6077-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shimamura T., Zhao W.H., Hu Z.Q. Mechanism of action and potential for use of tea catechin as an anti-infective agent. Anti-Infect. Agents Med. Chem. 2007;6:57–62. doi: 10.2174/187152107779314124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gea A., Stringano E., Brown R.H., Mueller-Harvey I. In situ analysis and structural elucidation of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) tannins for high-throughput germplasm screening. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011;59:495–503. doi: 10.1021/jf103609p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Theodoridou K., Aufrère J., Andueza D., Le Morvan A., Picard F., Stringano E., Pourrat J., Mueller-Harvey I., Baumont R. Effect of plant development during first and second growth cycle on chemical composition, condensed tannins and nutritive value of three sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) varieties and lucerne. Grass Forage Sci. 2011;66:402–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00798.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hayat M.A. Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy, Biological Applications. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ibrahim H.R., Sugimoto Y., Aoki T. Ovotransferrin antimicrobial peptide (OTAT-92) kills bacteria through a membrane damage mechanism. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1523:196–205. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4165(00)00122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Helander I.M., Alakomi H.L., Latva-Kala K., Mattila-Sandholm T., Pol I., Smid E.J., Gorris L.G.M., Von Wright A. Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on gram-negative bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998;46:3590–3595. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Je J.Y., Kim S.K. Chitosan derivatives killed bacteria by disrupting the outer and inner membrane. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006;54:6629–6633. doi: 10.1021/jf061310p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Helander I.M., Mattila-Sandholm T. Fluorometric assessment of gram-negative bacterial permeabilization. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000;88:213–219. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00971.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hancock R.E.W. Alterations in outer membrane permeability. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1984;38:237–264. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.38.100184.001321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scalbert A. Antimicrobial properties of tannins, review article number 63. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:3875–3883. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(91)83426-L. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Annuk H., Hirmo S., Türi E., Mikelsaar M., Arak E., Wadström T. Effect on cell surface hydrophobicity and susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to medicinal plant extracts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999;172:41–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Türi M., Türi E., Kõljalg S., Mikelsaar M. Influence of aqueous extracts of medicinal plants on surface hydrophobicity of Escherichia coli strains of different origin. APMIS. 1997;105:956–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1997.tb05107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kuehn M.J., Kesty N.C. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and the host-pathogen interaction. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2645–2655. doi: 10.1101/gad.1299905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rahman M., Kühn I., Rahman M., Olsson-Liljequist B., Möllby R. Evaluation of a scanner-assisted colorimetric MIC method for susceptibility testing of gram-negative fermentative bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2004;70:2398–2403. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2398-2403.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chung K.T., Lu Z., Chou M.W. Mechanism of inhibition of tannic acid and related compounds on the growth of intestinal bacteria. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1998;36:1053–1060. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(98)00086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Holowachuk S.A., Bal’a M.F., Buddington R.K. A kinetic microplate method for quantifying the antibacterial properties of biological fluids. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2003;55:441–446. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00190-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mustaffa F., Indurkar J., Ismail S., Shah M., Mansor S.M. An antimicrobial compound isolated from Cinnamomum iners leaves with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules. 2011;16:3037–3047. doi: 10.3390/molecules16043037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bach S.J., Wang Y., McAllister T.A. Effect of seaweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by feedlot cattle and on growth performance of lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008;142:17–32. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Berney M., Hammes F., Bosshard F., Weilenmann H.U., Egli T. Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:3283–3290. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02750-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bae H.D., McAllister T.A., Yanke L.J., Cheng K.-J., Muir A. D. Effects of condensed tannins on endoglucanase activity and filter paper digestion by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993;59:2131–2138. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.7.2132-2138.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]