Abstract
The overexpression of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in cancer can be used for peptide-receptor mediated radionuclide imaging and therapy. We have previously shown that an antagonist analog of bombesin RM26 conjugated to 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N',N''-triacetic acid (NOTA) via a diethyleneglycol (PEG2) spacer (NOTA-PEG2-RM26) and labeled with 68Ga can be used for imaging of GRPR-expressing tumors. In this study, we evaluated if a variation of mini-PEG spacer length can be used for optimization of targeting properties of the NOTA-conjugated RM26. A series of analogs with different PEG-length (n = 2, 3, 4, 6) was synthesized, radiolabeled and evaluated in vitro and in vivo. The IC50 values of natGa-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 (n = 2, 3, 4, 6) were 3.1 ± 0.2, 3.9 ± 0.3, 5.4 ± 0.4 and 5.8 ± 0.3 nM, respectively. In normal mice all conjugates demonstrated similar biodistribution pattern, however 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 showed lower liver uptake. Biodistribution of 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 was evaluated in nude mice bearing PC-3 (prostate cancer) and BT-474 (breast cancer) xenografts. High uptake in tumors (4.6 ± 0.6%ID/g and 2.8 ± 0.4%ID/g for PC-3 and BT-474 xenografts, respectively) and high tumor-to-background ratios (tumor/blood of 44 ± 12 and 42 ± 5 for PC-3 and BT-474 xenografts, respectively) were found already at 2 h p.i. of 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26. Results of this study suggest that variation in the length of the PEG spacer can be used for optimization of targeting properties of peptide-chelator conjugates. However, the influence of the mini-PEG length on biodistribution is minor when di-, tri-, tetra- and hexaethylene glycol are compared.
Keywords: bombesin analog, PEG, GRPR, antagonist, molecular imaging, breast cancer, prostate cancer, BT-474, PC-3 cells
1. Introduction
Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is a cell membrane receptor expressed in almost all the prostate cancer (PC) primary tumors and, frequently, in metastases [1,2]. The receptor expression was observed in 85.7% of lymph node metastases and 52.9% of bone metastases of PC patients [1]. Since normal prostate tissue as well as benign prostate tumors are mostly GRPR-negative, this receptor emerged as an attractive target for new diagnostic approaches and radionuclide therapeutic applications for PC patients [2].
The presence of GRPRs has also been documented in breast cancer (BC) [3]. In vitro receptor autoradiography on tissue sections has shown that 62% of the primary breast tumors are expressing GRPRs and when the receptor-positive breast cancers spread to local lymph nodes, the expression of GRPRs has been kept in the metastatic deposit [4]. It has been shown that all the metastases of the receptor-positive primary tumors are GRPR-positive and the expression density of primary tumors and metastases are generally high [4]. It has been also shown that these receptors contribute to the metastatic process by increasing cellular migration in BC [5]. The prevalence of these receptors in BC has led to develop GRPR-targeted diagnostic and therapeutic peptide-based pharmaceuticals [6,7].
Bombesin (BN), a linear amphibian tetradecapeptide, is an analog of the mammalian gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) and binds to GRPRs with high affinity and selectivity. Because of the poor in vivo stability of GRP, appreciable efforts have been made in the development of BN analogs for targeting of GRPR [8]. Different BN analogues were labeled with cytotoxic beta- and alpha-particle emitting nuclides 90Y [9], 177Lu [9,10] and 212/213Bi [11] for radionuclide therapy, and with gamma- and positron-emitting radionuclides 111In [9], 99mTc[12,13,14], 68Ga [13] and 64Cu [13,15] for visualization of GRPR-expressing tumors. BN shows high structural and functional homology with GRP. They share seven amino acids amidated C-terminus sequence homology, Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leu-Met-NH2. It has been shown that these C-terminal seven amino acids are responsible for binding to the GRPRs and any modification near C-terminus of BN analogs decreases the binding affinity [16]. Therefore, the N-terminus of these analogs was coupled to the chelators for loading with radiometals or modified for labeling with other radionuclides [13,15].
It has been shown that direct coupling of the radiometal-chelator complex to the N-terminal of the BN analogs decreases the receptor-binding affinity [17], while the application of a spacer prevents the interference of the radiometal-chelator complex with the binding site of the targeting vector to the GRPR [18]. The analog containing no spacer (X = 0) for 111In-DOTA-X-BN[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]NH2 has exhibited 100-fold lower binding affinity to GRPR in comparison with a 8-carbon aliphatic spacer containing analog [18]. Lys(sha)-βAla-βAla spacer for coupling of retro[Nα-carboxymethyl-histidine] to BN analogs for 99mTc(CO)3 labeling improved the affinity of conjugates by factor 23 [12]. It has also been demonstrated that excessive increase of the lipophilicity of the linker reduces the affinity [18]. Significantly higher liver uptake for hydrophobic spacer-containing analogs adds to the problem of the suboptimal pharmacokinetics of these analogs [18]. To improve the pharmacokinetic profiles for BN analogs, more hydrophilic spacer moieties were introduced. Schweinsberg et al. have shown that hydrophilic carbohydrate groups introduced into the linker sequence of 99mTc-labeled BN analogs decreased liver uptake significantly [19]. Increasing the charge of the spacer by insertion of negatively charged β3hGlu, demonstrated favorable biodistribution for a BN analog labeled using 99mTc-tricarbonyl core [20].
The polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been widely used for modification of therapeutic peptides and proteins [21]. PEGylation, the covalent attachment of the PEG to the biologically active molecule, is a modification methodology with the main purpose of reducing immunogenicity and rapid enzymatic degradation of the proteins [22]. The PEG4 spacer has been introduced in BN agonist (DOTA-PESIN) with the aim to increase its metabolic stability and to improve its tumour accumulation [23]. This has been found to be successful, moreover, an appreciable switch of elimination pathway from hepatic to renal was observed. PEGylation can also increase the overall hydrophilicity of the modified peptides and proteins [24,25]. However, introduction of PEG3 spacer into fluorinated RGD-based integrin-targeted peptide did not affected its hepatic uptake [26].
PEGylation might improve the pharmacokinetic properties of targeting molecules by appreciable reduction of the hepatic uptake and/or hepatobiliary excretion of the radiotracers. For example, a replacing the lipophilic 6-aminocaporoic acid (CA) linker with more hydrophilic PEG4 linker could enhance the clearance kinetics of 99mTc-labeled cyclic RGD peptide with minor impact on binding affinity to GPIIb/IIIa receptors [27]. The PEGylated BN(7–14) analog, where PEG with the length of 5–20 kDa was conjugated to the BN radiolabeled using 99mTc(CO)3, exhibited higher in vitro and in vivo stability [14]. It has also been shown that PEGylation did not affect the binding affinity although slower in vitro kinetics was found for PEG-conjugated BN analogs. Fast blood clearance via renal elimination and decreased hepatobiliary excretion led to higher tumor-to-non-tumor ratios for PEG-modified (5 kDa) BN in comparison with non-PEGylated analogs [14].
It should be taken into consideration that small modifications in the bioactive molecular targeting vectors can influence their biodistribution pattern and tumor targeting properties. The number of monomer units of polymer plays significant role in the biological behavior of PEG-modified conjugates. Because of the flexibility of the PEG chain, there is a risk of masking the biologically active receptor recognition site of the peptide and subsequently impairment of binding affinity by using long PEG spacers or chains [28]. There are some examples in the literature where PEGylated proteins exhibited unexpected behavior of increased activity or PEGylation changed the biological effects [29,30]. Asparaginase, an enzyme of therapeutic interest, exhibited increased activity after modification with mPEG2-COOSu [29]. It has further been shown that PEGvisomant, the PEGylated form of growth hormone receptor antagonist, showed lower antagonistic function compared with its non-PEGylated core molecule B2036 [30]. Thus, PEG modification can affect the pharmacological activity of drugs and therefore the balance between the degree of PEG modification and the molecular size of the drug should be considered [31].This influence could be even more pronounced for short peptides. Hence, modification in the length of the spacer moiety might influence the BN binding affinity to GRPRs and its in vivo kinetics.
We have previously investigated an antagonist analog of BN (D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2, RM26) conjugated to 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N',N''-triacetic acid (NOTA) via a diethylene glycol (PEG2) spacer (NOTA-PEG2-RM26) labeled with 68Ga, 111In and Al 18F [32,33]. This conjugate showed favorable properties for in vivo imaging of GRPR-expression in PC.
In this study we investigated the possibility to modulate the lipophilicity and thus liver uptake of the conjugate by introducing extended mini-PEG linkers. Since the liver is one of the major metastatic sites for BC, high radioactivity accumulation in the liver is an undesirable property for the imaging agents.
For this purpose, a series of NOTA-PEGn-RM26 (n = 2, 3, 4 and 6) conjugates were synthesized. The peptides were labeled with a short-lived generator-produced radionuclide 68Ga (T½ = 67.8 min) for imaging using positron emission tomography (PET). In vitro and in vivo studies were performed using PC-3 (PC cells) and BT-474 (BC cells). More long-lived 111In (T½ = 2.8 days) was used as a label in some in vitro experiments requiring longer time than it is permissible by the short half-life of 68Ga.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Peptide Synthesis
HPLC/MS analysis of the final products NOTA-PEGn-RM26 using Kinetex 2.6 µm C18 (50 × 3.0 mm) column and 2.5 min, 5%–60% acetonitrile/water (0.05% formic acid) gradient gave M/Z values in accordance with those expected for all the variants (Table 1). The purity, as determined by UV-HPLC (220 nm), was over 98% for all the conjugates.
Table 1.
PEG2 | PEG3 | PEG4 | PEG6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Synthetic yield (%) | 24 | 26 | 33 | 26 |
m/z value (m/z theor. value) | 1543.88 (1542.82) | 1601.58 (1600.86) | 1646.06 (1644.89) | 1734.23 (1732.94) |
Purity (%) | 98.3 | 99.3 | 99.8 | 99.5 |
2.2. Radiolabeling and Stability Test
The radiolabeling yield for 68Ga-and 111In-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 was typically over 98% (Table 2). A maximum specific radioactivity of 28 GBq/µmol and 6 GBq/µmol was obtained for 68Ga- and 111In-labeled NOTA-PEGn-RM26, respectively. Because of almost quantitative radiolabeling yields these tracers were used without further purification for in vitro studies while 68Ga-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 analogs were purified for in vivo studies using cartridge purification. All 68Ga- and 111In-labeled analogs demonstrated high stability after challenging with 1,000-fold molar excess of EDTA for 1 h at RT (Table 2). All NOTA-conjugated BN analogs were hydrophilic. LogD values of the 68Ga-labeled peptides were in the range between −2.27 ± 0.07 for 68Ga-NOTA-PEG2-RM26 and −2.50 ± 0.09 for 68Ga-NOTA-PEG6-RM26 (Table 2). There was a small but significant increase of the overall hydrophilicity of the conjugates with increasing length of the spacer from 2 to 3 ethyleneglycol units.
Table 2.
PEG2 | PEG3 | PEG4 | PEG6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Labeling yield for 68Ga, % | 99.4 ± 0.3 | 98 ± 1 | 99.2 ± 0.1 | 99.3 ± 0.1 |
Stability under EDTA challenge, % | 99.3 ± 0.1 | 98.1 ± 0.2 | 98.5 ± 0.1 | 99.1 ± 0.2 |
Labeling yield for 111In, % | 96 ± 2 | 97 ± 2 | 97 ± 2 | 97 ± 2 |
Stability under EDTA challenge, % | 95.5 ± 0.3 | 92.5 ± 0.7 | 94.3 ± 0.6 | 94.6 ± 0.7 |
LogD of 68Ga-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 | −2.27 ± 0.07 | −2.47 ± 0.06 | −2.49 ± 0.10 | −2.50 ± 0.09 |
2.3. In Vitro Studies
2.3.1. In Vitro Binding Specificity Assay
To ensure that the GRPR-binding capacity of NOTA-PEGn-RM26 was preserved after labeling, in vitro binding specificity tests was performed using PC-3 and, for NOTA-PEG3-RM26, BT-474 cells. The binding of 68Ga- and 111In-labeled NOTA-PEGn-RM26 to these GRPR-expressing cells was receptor mediated since pre-saturation of the cells with non-labeled peptides significantly decreased the cell binding of the radiolabeled compounds (Table 3).
Table 3.
PEG2 | PEG3 | PEG4 | PEG6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
In vitro binding specificity test, % blocked uptake of 68Ga-labeled variants on PC-3 (BT474) cells in presence of excess of non-labeled tracer | 94.5 ± 0.1 | 98.0 ± 0.1 (95.3 ± 0.2) | 98.2 ± 0.1 | 95.5 ± 0.3 |
In vitro binding specificity test, % blocked uptake of 111In-labeled variants on PC-3 (BT474) cells in the presence of excess of non-labeled tracer | 97.7 ± 0.2 | 94.0 ± 0.2 (95.0 ± 0.4) | 95.0 ± 0.9 | 94.8 ± 0.4 |
Internalization rate by PC-3 (BT474) cells, % internalized radioactivity from total cell associated at 24 h continuous incubation | 33 ± 3 | 31 ± 2 (32 ± 2) | 30 ± 1 | 35 ± 2 |
2.3.2. Cellular Uptake and Internalization
Figure 1 presents the binding of 111In-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 to the PC-3 and BT-474 cells. Binding and processing of other 111In-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 conjugates to PC-3 cells was very similar to binding and processing of 111In-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 (data not shown). The binding was rapid, and the cell-associated radioactivity reached a plateau between 4 h and 8 h. The internalization rate of the 111In-labeled conjugates was slow. After 24 h of incubation, the contribution of the internalized radioactivity to the overall cell-bound radioactivity was 30%–35% for both of the cell lines (Table 3).
2.3.3. Real-Time Ligand Binding Kinetics: KD and Bmax Determination
LigandTracer measurements showed that all conjugates had rapid on-rate and slow off-rate (Table 4). The calculated KD values for 111In-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 were in the low picomolar range. The number of binding sites was 417,000 ± 12,000 and 157,000 ± 7,000 receptors/cell for PC-3 and BT-474 cells, respectively, as measured using 111In-NOTA-PEG3-RM26.
Table 4.
PEG2 | PEG3 | PEG4 | PEG6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Association rate, ka, M−1 s−1 | (2.9 ± 0.3) × 105 | (8 ± 4) × 105 | (5 ± 3) × 105 | (6 ± 5) × 105 |
Dissociation rate, kd, s−1 | (11.2 ± 0.0) × 10−6 | (2.7 ± 0.2) × 10−6 | (2.5 ± 0.0) × 10−6 | (7 ± 3) × 10−6 |
KD, pM | 23 ± 13 | 5 ± 3 | 8 ± 5 | 18 ± 8 |
2.3.4. In Vitro Competitive Binding Assay: IC50 Determination
The binding properties of natGa-loaded analogs were compared in a competitive binding assay using 125I-Tyr4-BBN as the displacement radioligand (Figure 2). The IC50 values of natGa-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 increased with the increase of the mini-PEG spacer length. The difference in IC50 was within factor two for natGa-NOTA-PEG2-RM26 and natGa-NOTA-PEG6-RM26, and there was no difference between valuses for natGa-NOTA-PEG4-RM26 and natGa-NOTA-PEG6-RM26.
2.4. In Vivo Studies
2.4.1. Biodistribution in NMRI Mice
The biodistribution of 68Ga-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 in female NMRI mice was performed to assess their blood and whole body clearance. Data at 1 and 2 h p.i. are presented in Table 5. All 68Ga-labeled analogs showed rapid whole body and blood clearance. Low radioactivity in the GI tract (with content) suggests that the renal excretion was predominant. Low kidney retention and liver uptake was found for all the conjugates. Significantly lower radioactivity accumulation was found in the liver for 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 compared to PEG4 and PEG6 variants. It should be noted that the decrease of the hepatic uptake was minor, as all uptake values were in the range of 0.6–1.1%ID/g at 1 h p.i. Furthermore, the difference between the hepatic uptake of PEG2 and PEG3-bearing peptides was not significant (despite their differences in logD). Uptake of all tested conjugates in GRPR-expressing organs (pancreas and organs of GI) was high at 1 h p.i., but radioactivity was significantly decreased in these organs already 2 h p.i.
Table 5.
PEG2 | PEG3 | PEG4 | PEG6 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organ | 1 h | 2 h | 1 h | 2 h | 1 h | 2 h | 1 h | 2 h | ||
Blood | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.065 ± 0.002 | 0.25 ± 0.06 | 0.073 ± 0.007 | 0.27 ± 0.06 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | ||
Lung | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 0.20 ± 0.05 a | 0.17 ± 0.01 a | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.14 ± 0.08 | ||
Liver | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 a,b | 0.7 ± 0.1 a,b | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.06 ± 0.04 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | ||
Spleen | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.40 ± 0.04 b | 0.3 ± 0.1 a | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | ||
Pancreas | 7 ± 3 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 6.6 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 0.7 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | ||
Stomach | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 0.90 ± 0.08 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | ||
Sm. intest. | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 0.51 ± 0.09 | ||
Kidney | 3 ± 2 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.3 b | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 1.08 ± 0.09 | ||
Muscle | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.019 ± 0.002 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | ||
Bone | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.050 ± 0.003 | 0.12 ± 0.05 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.06 | ||
GI * | 4 ± 2 | 2.88 ± 0.06 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 0.9 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | ||
Carcass * | 4 ± 1 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 3 ± 1 | 0.71 ± 0.05 |
* Uptakes in GI and carcass are presented as %ID per whole sample; a Indicates that the 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 uptake was significantly lower than 68Ga-NOTA-PEG4-RM26 uptake; b Indicates that the 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 uptake was significantly lower than 68Ga-NOTA-PEG6-RM26 uptake.
2.4.2. Biodistribution and in vivo Binding Specificity Test in Female BALB/c nu/nu Mice Bearing PC-3 and BT-474 Xenografts
The results for in vivo binding specificity test for 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 in PC-3 and BT-474 xenografted mice are presented in Table 6. Tumors and receptor-positive normal organs showed GRPR-specific uptake. Pre-saturating the receptors with co-injection of non-labeled peptide decreased the tumor uptake almost 5-fold, from 4.6 ± 0.6%ID/g to 0.97 ± 0.04%ID/g for PC-3 tumors and more than 7-fold, from 2.8 ± 0.4%ID/g to 0.4 ± 0.01%ID/g for BT-474 tumors. The radioactivity uptake in normal organs except in liver and spleen was similar for both xenograft models. Almost 3-fold lower liver and more than 4-fold lower spleen uptake was found for BT-474 xenografted mice compared to PC-3 tumor bearing animals.
Table 6.
PC-3 Cells | BT474 Cells | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Organ | Non-Blocked | Blocked | Non-Blocked | Blocked |
Blood | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.060 ± 0.010 * | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.06 |
Liver | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.81 ± 0.08 |
Spleen | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 |
Pancreas | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 0.27 ± 0.04 * | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 0.3 ± 90.04 * |
Small intestine | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.21 ± 0.08 * | 0.66 ± 0.08 | 0.48 ± 0.09 * |
Kidney | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.2 * | 1.65 ± 0.09 | 4.25 ± 0.05 * |
Tumor | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 0.97 ± 0.04 * | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.1 * |
Muscle | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.030 ± 0.003 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.04 |
Bone | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.05 |
* Indicates that uptake was significantly lower in blocked than non-blocked groups.
2.5. Imaging Studies
The mice with PC-3 or BT-474 xenografts injected with 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 were imaged 2 h p.i. (Figure 3). The tumors (right hind legs) were clearly visualized for both models, a finding that was in good agreement with the biodistribution data. Accumulation of radioactivity was also detected in the kidneys and abdominal area.
2.6. Discussion
BN-based tracers are promising molecules for radionuclide imaging as well as therapy for selective targeting of GRPR-expressing malignancies, such as prostate and breast tumors. Many of the BN conjugates showed high liver uptake and tendency for predominant hepatobiliary excretion owing to their high lipophilicity [34,35]. Although PC may rarely spread to the liver in very late stage (when imaging is not relevant anymore), this organ is one of the most common sites that BC spreads to. It would be desirable to use the same imaging agent for visualization of both PC and BC. Hence, low unspecific uptake of radiotracers in the liver is essential, as it would provide a high tumor-to-background contrast for BC. Different strategies were taken into consideration in order to tackle the problem of high unspecific liver uptake of BN-analogs [9,36,37,38,39]. It has been demonstrated that introduction of hydrophilic spacers can compensate highly lipophilic character of BN analogs [12,19,20,39]. One strategy for increasing hydrophilicity of BN is the use of mini-PEG as biodistribution modifier [13,14]. Previously, we showed that 68Ga-NOTA-PEG2-RM26, having PEG2 spacer between the chelator and the peptide had favorable biodistribution profile, i.e., rapid blood clearance, low hepatobiliary excretion, low kidney re-absorbtion, high and stable tumor uptake, and rapid washout from normal GRPR-positive organs [32]. As minor modifications in structure of short peptides [40] could lead to substantial effect on their targeting properties, we evaluated if the use of mini-PEG polymer with different length (2, 3, 4 or 6 units) can be used for modification of binding and biodistribution properties of NOTA-PEGn-RM26 conjugates.
A surprisingly low impact on the biological outcome was observed when different mini-PEG lengths were investigated. This indicates that the preferred length of the mini-PEG chain in this case can be based on straightforwardness of synthesis or purification of the peptides instead of the biodistribution or clearance. In our case, all the peptide analogs discussed were obtain in a similar yield and equally easely purified, but the starting material for the shorter analogs were much easier to handle due to their crystalline appearance compered to PEG6 that was an oil.
The increase of mini-PEG length from PEG2 to PEG3 resulted in a small but significant increase of overall hydrophilicity of 68Ga-labeled conjugates (Table 2). Further increase of hydrophilicity was not significant.
It might be expected that the introduction of a longer mini-PEG moiety impairs the affinity of the binding sequence of NOTA-PEGn-RM26 to the receptors. Indeed, 111In-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 demonstrated the lowest KD value. However, all of the 111In-labeled variants showed the high affinity for GRPR and bound with subpicomolar KD values to the receptors. The IC50 values of natGa-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 were also in the same low nanomolar range, and 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 showed one of the lowest half inhibition concentrations. It is notable that IC50 and KD values differ in three orders of magnitude for the studied conjugates. It should be mentioned that both these parameters reflect affinity of the conjugate to its receptors. However, accuracy of IC50 measurements relies on equilibrium being reached during the time of experiment. This has been identified as a potential source of underestimation of binding capacity, since high affinity binders may have equilibration time of many hours [41]. On the opposite KD values in this study were measured by monitoring the ligand-receptor binding in real-time and did not depend on equilibrium. Moreover, time-resolved interaction measurements provide information about binding kinetics (the association and dissociation rates) [42].
Blood clearance rate via kidney ultrafiltration in NMRI mice was fast for all studied conjugates with no significant difference (Table 5). No significantly different uptake was found in majority of non-target organs, or in receptor-positive organs (Table 5). However, radioactivity accumulations of 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 in the liver was slightly but significantly lower (p < 0.05) than uptake of 68Ga-NOTA-PEG4-RM26 and 68Ga-NOTA-PEG6-RM26. On the basis of the biodistribution data in NMRI mice and affinity data, we selected 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 as the most suitable conjugate for biodistribution and in vivo binding specificity study in tumor bearing mice. In a good agreement with our previous data [32,33], specific uptake was found in receptor-positive abdominal area organs (pancreas as the most abundant receptor expressing organ, stomach and small intestine) and the tumors (Table 6). Both the tumor xenografts were visualized with microPET/CT at 2 h p.i. 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 provided images with well detectable tumors and residual renal radioactivity. Even BT-474 xenografts with lower level of gene expression (almost a third of the expression level in PC-3 cells) were visualized clearly after 2 h p.i. The liver and spleen uptake was significantly lower for BT-474 xenografted mice both in ex vivo measurements and in imaging. We speculate that implanted estradiol pellets may affect experimental outcomes.
This study demonstrated the suitability of BN antagonistic analogs, NOTA-PEGn-RM26 (n = 2, 3, 4 and 6), for visualization of GRPR-expression in prostate and breast tumors with favorable excretion kinetics. The hepatic uptake was very low for all the conjugates and the marginal difference in liver uptake for different variants suggests that the addition of only few PEGs to the linker sequence is not sufficient to dramatically change the biodistribution of this peptide. However, it is still suitable for a fine tuning of the targeting properties. The size and lipophilicity of the present analogs were optimized for the imaging of GRPR-expressing tumors with high contrast within a short time after administration both for PC with metastases in the lower abdomen and BC with liver metastases.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. Peptide Synthesis
NOTA-PEGn-[D-Phe6, Sta13, Leu14]Bombesin[6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14] (n = 2, 3, 4 and 6), NOTA-PEGn-RM26 (Figure 4) were synthesized by manual solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) using standard Fmoc/t-Bu conditions as described earlier [32].
3.2. Radiolabeling and Stability Test
The 111In-, 68Ga- and natGa-labeling and quality controls were performed based on protocols presented earlier [32]. Buffers for labeling were purified from metal contamination by Chelex 100 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). For 68Ga labeling, 10 µL (aqueous solution of 10 nmol) of NOTA-PEGn-RM26 buffered with 250 µL of sodium acetate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to obtain pH 3.9 was incubated with 1 mL 68Ga-containing eluate (600 MBq) for 10 min at 75 °C. For cold isotope loading, 14 nmol of natGaCl3, aq. solution (50 µL), (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, MO, USA) were added to 10 nmol of NOTA-PEGn-RM26 using the same protocols as for radioactive isotopes.
The reaction mixtures of 68Ga-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 were purified using solid phase extraction. Briefly, the reaction mixtures were diluted with 3 mL of deionized water and passed through a 1 mL Oasis HLB cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The cartridge was then washed with 5 mL of deionized water to remove any unreacted 68Ga. The radiolabeled product was eluted with 1 mL of 1:1 EtOH/water. The chemical and radiochemical purity of 68Ga-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 after purification was checked by UV-radio-HPLC. The conditions were as follows: A = 10 mM TFA; B = 70% acetonitrile (MeCN), 30% H2O, and 10 mM TFA with UV-detection at 220 nm; gradient elution: 0–2 min at 35% B, 2–9 min at 35 to 100% B, 9–12 min at 100% B; and flow rate was 2.0 mL/min. The analytes were separated using an analytical column with a stationary phase consisting of covalently bonded pentylsilane (Discovery BIO Wide Pore C5; 5 cm × 4.6 mm).
For routine control, radiochemical purity of 68Ga- and 111In-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 was analyzed by ITLC (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA) using 0.2 M citric acid (pH 2.0) as the mobile phase. The method was cross-calibrated with HPLC (see above). In this system free indium, gallium and their complexes migrate with the solvent front (Rf = 1.0), while peptides remain at the origin (Rf = 0.0).
For 111In labeling, the pH of 10 µL (aqueous solution of 10 nmol) of NOTA-PEGn-RM26 was adjusted to 5.5 using 80 µL of 0.2 M ammonium acetate (Merck) and mixed with 80–150 µL (~60 MBq) of 111In (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland). The mixture was incubated at 80 °C for 30 min.
To evaluate labeling stability, 68Ga-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 or 111In -NOTA-PEGn-RM26 were challenged with 1000-fold molar excess of disodium salt of EDTA (Sigma) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT).
For determination of logD, n-octanol (750 µL) was added to a tube with 750 μL of PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 nmol of a 68Ga-labeled conjugate, the tube was vigorously vortexed and then centrifuged (14,000 rpm) for 4 min. Aliquots of 50 μL were taken from each phase, and their radioactivity was measured in an automated gamma-counter with 3-inch NaI(Tl) detector (1480 WIZARD, Wallac OyTurku, Finland). Each measurement was repeated nine times. The distribution coefficient was calculated as the average log of a ratio of the radioactivity in the octanol and the PBS fractions.
3.3. In Vitro Studies
GRPR expressing human PC cell line PC-3 and human BC cell line BT-474 (ATCC) were cultured in RPMI media complemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine and PEST (penicillin 100 IU/mL) (all from Biochrom AG, Berlin, Germany). This media is referred as complete media in the text. In all in vitro experiments, cells were incubated in complete medium and detached using trypsin-EDTA solution (0.25% trypsin, 0.02% EDTA in buffer; Biochrom AG). All experiments were performed in triplicate and 1 × 106 cells/dish were seeded one day before the experiment.
3.3.1. In Vitro Binding Specificity Assay
The binding specificity of 68Ga- and 111In-labeled NOTA-PEGn-RM26 was tested on PC-3 and BT-474 cells. The cells were incubated with 1 nM concentration of 68Ga- and 111In-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 solution for 1 h at 37 °C. One set of dishes in each experiment was pre-saturated with 100-fold excess of unlabeled peptide, added 5 min before the addition of the radiolabeled compound. After being washed twice with serum free media, cells were detached by treatment with 0.5 mL trypsin-EDTA solution. Cell associated radioactivity was measured in the gamma-counter and presented as percentage from added radioactivity.
3.3.2. Real-Time Ligand Binding Kinetics: KD and Bmax Determination
The kinetics of binding of 111In-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 to the PC-3 cells was measured in real-time at RT using LigandTracer instruments (Ridgeview Instruments AB, Uppsala, Sweden), as described previously [42]. In addition, binding of the most promising candidate, 111In-NOTA-PEG3-RM26, was measured using BT-474 cells. Two radioligand concentrations were used: 0.3 and 10 nM. These concentrations were chosen to receive a clear increase in signal by addition of the second concentration. Uptake was monitored for 200 min and retention for 1200 min. Interaction analysis and calculation of equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) was performed with TracerDrawer software (Ridgeview Instruments AB). To determine the number of binding sites per cell, Bmax, cells were incubated with 20 nM of 111In-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 at RT. When radioactivity uptake reached saturation, cells were washed twice with serum-free media and after being trypsinized, detached cells were counted and collected for radioactivity measurement. Data were used for calculation of the Bmax, on PC-3 and BT-474 cells.
3.3.3. In Vitro Competitive Binding Assay: IC50 Determination
An in vitro competition experiment was performed on PC-3 cells using 125I-Tyr4-BBN (Perkin Elmer). The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined for non-radioactive natGa-loaded conjugates. Cell monolayers were incubated with natGa-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 (0–395 nM) in the presence of 0.1 pmol (~100,000 cpm) 125I-Tyr4-BBN for 3 h at 4 °C. After the incubation, the cells were collected, and cell-associated radioactivity was determined as described above. The IC50 values were determined using GraphPad software.
3.3.4. Cellular Uptake and Internalization Assay
PC-3 cells were incubated with 2 nM of 111In-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 at 37 °C for 24 h. At predetermined time points, the incubation media was discarded, the cells were washed and the membrane-bound and internalized radioactivity were collected using the method described earlier [43]. In addition, the uptake and internalization of 111In-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 was studied on BT-474 cells.
3.4. In Vivo Studies
All animal experiments were planned and performed according to the Swedish national legislation on the protection of laboratory animals, and the study plans were approved by the local committee for animal research ethics. The biodistribution of 68Ga-labeled NOTA-PEGn-RM26 was evaluated in female NMRI mice (weight: 30 ± 3 g). BALB/c nu/nu female mice (weight: 19.8 ± 0.7 g) bearing PC-3 or BT-474 xenografts (10 × 106 cells/mouse, implanted 3 weeks before the experiment) were used for in vivo binding specificity and tumor targeting study using 68Ga-labeled NOTA-PEG3-RM26. The mice for BT-474 xenografts were implanted subcutaneously with 17β-estradiol pellets (0.05 mg/21-day release, Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL, USA) before tumor cell inoculation and cells were inoculated in Matrigel/PBS (1:1). The average tumor size for both cell lines was 0.4 ± 0.1 g at the time of the experiment.
3.4.1. Biodistribution in NMRI Mice
Female NMRI mice (3 mice per data point) were injected with 45 pmol of 68Ga-NOTA-PEGn-RM26 (350 or 700 kBq, 100 µL in PBS) into the tail vein. The administrated peptide dose was adjusted to 45 pmol by dilution with non-labeled NOTA-PEGn-RM26. The mice were euthanized at 1 and 2 h p.i. by intraperitoneal injection of a Ketalar-Rompun solution (10 mg/mL Ketalar and 1 mg/mL Rompun; 20 µL of solution per gram of body weight). Blood samples were collected by heart puncture. The organs of interest were collected, weighed, and their radioactivity content was measured in the gamma-counter. The organ uptake values are expressed as %ID/g except for gastrointestinal (GI) tract (with content) and carcass in which data are presented as %ID per whole sample.
3.4.2. Biodistribution and in vivo Binding Specificity Test in BALB/c nu/nu Mice Bearing PC-3 Prostate Cancer and BT-474 Breast Cancer Xenografts
To study tumor targeting, female BALB/c nu/nu mice bearing PC-3 and BT-474 xenografts (4 mice per data point) were intravenously injected with 45 pmol of 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26 (700 kBq, 100 µL in PBS). The mice were euthanized at 2 h p.i. and the organ radioactivity content was measured and evaluated as described above. To test the in vivo binding specificity, a group of animals was co-injected with 20 nmol of unlabeled peptide, and biodistribution was measured at 2 h p.i.
3.5. Imaging Studies
The mice bearing PC-3 or BT-474 tumors were injected with 45 pmol of 68Ga-NOTA-PEG3-RM26. The animals were sacrificed 2 h p.i. and scanned with a micro-PET/CT (Gamma Medica Inc., Salem, NH, USA). The PET and CT data were fused and analyzed using PMOD v3.13 (PMOD Technologies Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland).
3.6. Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed by un-paired, two-tailed t-test using Prism (version 4.00; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CAP value below 0.05 was considered significant.
4. Conclusions
Systematic investigations of the effects of the length of PEG-spacer on in vivo pharmacokinetics enabled minimization of hepatic uptake. However, the influence of the length of PEG-spacer is minor when two, three, four and six ethylene glycol units are compared.
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported by Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden) and the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet). Ram Kumar Selvaraju and Veronika Asplund (Preclinical PET Platform, Uppsala University) are acknowledged for assistance with microPET/CT camera imaging.
Author Contributions
Zohreh Varasteh: planning all studies, radiolabeling, in vitro studies, in vivo studies, preparing of the first draft of the manuscript, Ulrika Rosenström, Gunnar Lindeberg, Mats Larhed: molecular design of conjugates; peptide synthesis, purification and characterization of radiolabeled peptides; Irina Velikyan: establishing labelling chemistry and analysis of radiolabeled peptides; Bogdan Mitran: in vitro studies with radiolabeled peptides, treatment and evaluation of in vitro data; Mohamed Altai, Hadis Honarvar, Maria Rosestedt: in vivo studies, treatment and evaluation of in vivo data; Jens Sörensen: provided clinical competence in development of radiolabeled conjugates, critical contribution and revision of nabuscript enhancing its intellectual content; Vladimir Tolmachev: molecular design of conjugates, supervision of labelling chemistry; Anna Orlova: planning, supervision and coordination of all studies. All co-authors participated in drafting, critically contributing to or revising the manuscript, and in approving the final content of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds NOTA-PEGn-RM26 (n = 2, 3, 4 and 6) are available from the authors.
References
- 1.Ananias H.J., van den Heuvel M.C., Helfrich W., de Jong I.J. Expression of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, the prostate stem cell antigen and the prostate-specific membrane antigen in lymph node and bone metastases of prostate cancer. Prostate. 2009;69:1101–1108. doi: 10.1002/pros.20957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beer M., Montani M., Gerhardt J., Wild P.J., Hany T.F., Hermanns T., Müntener M., Kristiansen G. Profiling gastrin-releasing peptide receptor in prostate tissues: Clinical implications and molecular correlates. Prostate. 2012;72:318–325. doi: 10.1002/pros.21434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Halmos G., Wittliff J.L., Schally A.V. Characterization of bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide receptors in human breast cancer and their relationship to steroid receptor expression. Cancer Res. 1995;55:280–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gugger M., Reubi J.C. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors in non-neoplastic and neoplastic human breast. Am. J. Pathol. 1999;155:2067–2076. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65525-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chao C., Ives K., Hellmich H.L., Townsend C.M., Jr., Hellmich M.R. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor in breast cancer mediates cellular migration and interleukin-8 expression. J. Surg. Res. 2009;156:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Van de Wiele C., Dumont F., Broecke R.V., Oosterlinck W., Cocquyt V., Serreyn R., Peers S., Thornback J., Slegers G., Dierckx R.A. Technetium-99m RP527, a GRP analogue for visualisation of GRP receptor-expressing malignancies: A feasibility study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2000;27:1694–1699. doi: 10.1007/s002590000355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schwartsmann G., DiLeone L.P., Horowitz M., Schunemann D., Cancella A., Pereira A.S., Richter M., Souza F., da Rocha A.B., Souza F.H., et al. A phase I trial of the bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide (BN/GRP) antagonist RC3095 in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Invest. New Drugs. 2006;24:403–412. doi: 10.1007/s10637-006-6886-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dijkgraaf I., Franssen G.M., McBride W.J., D’Souza C.A., Laverman P., Smith C.J., Goldenberg D.M., Oyen W.J., Boerman O.C. PET of tumors expressing gastrin-releasing peptide receptor with an 18F-labeled bombesin analog. J. Nucl. Med. 2012;53:947–952. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.100891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang H., Chen J., Waldherr C., Hinni K., Waser B., Reubi J.C., Maecke H.R. Synthesis and evaluation of bombesin derivatives on the basis of pan-bombesin peptides labeled with indium-111, lutetium-177, and yttrium-90 for targeting bombesin receptor-expressing tumors. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6707–6715. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Däpp S., Müller C., Garayoa E.G., Bläuenstein P., Maes V., Brans L., Tourwé D.A., Schibli R. PEGylation, increasing specific activity and multiple dosing as strategies to improve the risk-benefit profile of targeted radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTA-bombesin analogues. EJNMMI Res. 2012;2:24–36. doi: 10.1186/2191-219X-2-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wild D., Frischknecht M., Zhang H., Morgenstern A., Bruchertseifer F., Boisclair J., Provencher-Bolliger A., Reubi J.C., Maecke H.R. Alpha- versus beta-particle radiopeptide therapy in a human prostate cancer model (213Bi-DOTA-PESIN and 213Bi-AMBA versus 177Lu-DOTA-PESIN) Cancer Res. 2011;71:1009–1018. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Garayoa E.G., Schweinsberg C., Maes V., Rüegg D., Blanc A., Bläuenstein P., Tourwé D.A., Beck-Sickinger A.G., Schubiger P.A. New [99mTc]bombesin analogues with improved biodistribution for targeting gastrin releasing-peptide receptor-positive tumors. QJ Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2007;51:42–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abiraj K., Mansi R., Tamma M.L., Fani M., Forrer F., Nicolas G., Cescato R., Reubi J.C., Maecke H.R. Bombesin antagonist-based radioligands for translational nuclear imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-positive tumors. J. Nucl. Med. 2011;52:1970–1978. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.094375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Däpp S., Garayoa E.G., Maes V., Brans L., Tourwé D.A., Müller C., Schibli R. PEGylation of (99m)Tc-labeled bombesin analogues improves their pharmacokinetic properties. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2011;38:997–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Biddlecombe G.B., Rogers B.E., de Visser M., Parry J.J., de Jong M., Erion J.L., Lewis J.S. Molecular imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-positive tumors in mice using 64Cu- and 86Y-DOTA-(Pro1,Tyr4)-bombesin(1-14) Bioconjug. Chem. 2007;18:724–730. doi: 10.1021/bc060281l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moody T.W., Crawley J.N., Jensen R.T. Pharmacology and neurochemistry of bombesin-like peptides. Peptides. 1982;3:559–563. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(82)90126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Breeman W.A., Hofland L.J., de Jong M., Bernard B.F., Srinivasan A., Kwekkeboom D.J., Visser T.J., Krenning E.P. Evaluation of radiolabelled bombesin analogues for receptor-targeted scintigraphy and radiotherapy. Int. J. Cancer. 1999;81:658–665. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990517)81:4<658::aid-ijc24>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hoffman T.J., Gali H., Smith C.J., Sieckman G.L., Hayes D.L., Owen N.K., Volkert W.A. Novel series of 111In-labeled bombesin analogs as potential radiopharmaceuticals for specific targeting of gastrin-releasing peptide receptors expressed on human prostate cancer cells. J. Nucl. Med. 2003;44:823–831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schweinsberg C., Maes V., Brans L., Bläuenstein P., Tourwé D.A., Schubiger P.A., Schibli R., Garayoa E.G. Novel glycated [99mTc(CO)3]-labeled bombesin analogues for improved targeting of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-positive tumors. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008;19:2432–2439. doi: 10.1021/bc800319g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garayoa G.E., Schweinsberg C., Maes V., Brans L., Bläuenstein P., Tourwe D.A., Schibli R., Schubiger P.A. Influence of the molecular charge on the biodistribution of bombesin analogues labeled with the [99mTc(CO)3]-core. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008;19:2409–2416. doi: 10.1021/bc800262m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Roberts M.J., Bentley M.D., Harris J.M. Chemistry for peptide and protein PEGylation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002;54:459–476. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Abuchowski A., van Es T., Palczuk N.C., Davis F.F. Alteration of immunological properties of bovine serum albumin by covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol. J. Biol. Chem. 1977;252:3578–3581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang H., Schuhmacher J., Waser B., Wild D., Eisenhut M., Reubi J., Maecke H. DOTA-PESIN, a DOTA-conjugated bombesin derivative designed for imaging and targeting radionuclide treatment of bombesin receptor-positive tumours. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2007;34:1198–1208. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0347-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Veronese F.M., Pasut G. PEGylation, successful approach to drug delivery. Drug Discov. Today. 2005;10:1451–1458. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03575-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Veronese F.M., Mero A. The impact of PEGylation on biological therapies. BioDrugs. 2008;22:315–329. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200822050-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu Z., Li Z-B., Cai W., He L., Chin F.T., Li F., Chen X. 18F-labeled mini-PEG spacered RGD dimer (18F-FPRGD2): Synthesis and microPET imaging of αvβ3 integrin expression. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2007;34:1823–1831. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0427-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fang W., He J., Kim Y.S., Zhou Y., Liu S. Evaluation of 99mTc-labeled cyclic RGD peptide with a PEG4 linker for thrombosis imaging: Comparison with DMP444. Bioconjug. Chem. 2011;22:1715–1722. doi: 10.1021/bc2003742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Veronese F.M. Peptide and protein PEGylation: A review of problems and solutions. Biomaterials. 2001;22:405–417. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00193-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Monfardini C., Schiavon O., Caliceti P., Morpurgo M., Harris J.M., Veronese F.M. A branched monomethoxypoly(ethylene glycol) for protein modification. Bioconjug. Chem. 1995;6:62–69. doi: 10.1021/bc00031a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pradhananga S., Wilkinson I., Ross R.J. Pegvisomant: Structure and function. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2002;29:11–14. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0290011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tsutsumi Y., Tsunoda S., Kamada H., Kihira T., Nakagawa S., Kaneda Y., Kanamori T., Mayumi T. Molecular design of hybrid tumour necrosis factor-alpha. II: The molecular size of polyethylene glycol-modified tumour necrosis factor-alpha affects its anti-tumour potency. Br. J. Cancer. 1996;74:1090–1095. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Varasteh Z., Velikyan I., Lindeberg G., Sörensen J., Larhed M., Sandström M., Selvaraju R.K., Malmberg J., Tolmachev V., Orlova A. Synthesis and characterization of a high-affinity NOTA-conjugated bombesin antagonist for GRPR-targeted tumor imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 2013;24:1144–1153. doi: 10.1021/bc300659k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Varasteh Z., Aberg O., Velikyan I., Lindeberg G., Sörensen J., Larhed M., Antoni G., Sandström M., Tolmachev V., Orlova A. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a (18)F-labeled high affinity NOTA conjugated bombesin antagonist as a PET ligand for GRPR-targeted tumor imaging. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A., Hohenberger P., Haberkorn U., Mäcke H.R., Eisenhut M., Strauss L.G. 68Ga-labeled bombesin studies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Comparison with 18F-FDG. J. Nucl. Med. 2007;48:1245–1250. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Van de Wiele C., Phonteyne P., Pauwels P., Goethals I., van den Broecke R., Cocquyt V., Dierckx R.A. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor imaging in human breast carcinoma versus immunohistochemistry. J. Nucl. Med. 2008;49:260–264. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nock B.A., Nikolopoulou A., Galanis A., Cordopatis P., Waser B., Reubi J.C., Maina T. Potent bombesin-like peptides for GRP-receptor targeting of tumors with 99mTc: A preclinical study. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:100–110. doi: 10.1021/jm049437y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kunstler J.U., Veerendra B., Figueroa S.D., Sieckman G.L., Rold T.L., Hoffman T.J., Smith C.J., Pietzsch H.J. Organometallic 99m Tc(III) ‘4 + 1’ bombesin(7-14) conjugates: Synthesis, radiolabeling, and in vitro/in vivo studies. Bioconjug. Chem. 2007;18:1651–1661. doi: 10.1021/bc700197m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Prasanphanich A.F., Nanda P.K., Rold T.L., Ma L., Lewis M.R., Garrison J.C., Hoffman T.J., Sieckman G.L., Figueroa S.D., Smith C.J. [64Cu-NOTA-8-Aoc-BBN(7-14)NH2] targeting vector for positron-emission tomography imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-expressing tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:12462–12467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705347104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Garayoa E.G., Ruegg D., Blauenstein P., Zwimpfer M., Khan I.U., Maes V., Blanc A., Beck-Sickinger A.G., Tourwe D.A., Schubiger P.A. Chemical and biological characterization of new Re(CO)3/[99mTc](CO)3bombesin analogues. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2007;34:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tolmachev V., Orlova A. Influence of labelling methods on biodistribution and imaging properties of radiolabelled peptides for visualisation of molecular therapeutic targets. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010;17:2636–2655. doi: 10.2174/092986710791859397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Humle E.C., Trevetchick M.A. Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: Validation and interpretation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010;161:1219–1237. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00604.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xu B., Varasteh Z., Orlova A., Andersson K., Larhammar D., Björkelund H. Detecting interactions with GPCR in real-time on living cells to understand receptor dynamics. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;441:820–824. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.10.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wållberg H., Orlova A. Slow internalization of anti-HER2 synthetic Affibody monomer 111In-DOTA-ZHER2:342-pep2: Implications for development of labeled tracers. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2008;23:435–442. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2008.0464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]