Abstract
A series of 12 novel monosubstituted N-benzyl amides of salinomycin (SAL) was synthesized for the first time and characterized by NMR and FT-IR spectroscopic methods. Molecular structures of three salinomycin derivatives in the solid state were determined using single crystal X-ray method. All compounds obtained were screened for their antiproliferative activity against various human cancer cell lines as well as against the most problematic bacteria strains such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Novel salinomycin derivatives exhibited potent anticancer activity against drug-resistant cell lines. Additionally, two N-benzyl amides of salinomycin revealed interesting antibacterial activity. The most active were N-benzyl amides of SAL substituted at -ortho position and the least anticancer active derivatives were those substituted at the -para position.
Keywords: anticancer activity, antibacterial activity, antitubercular activity, SAR studies, ionophores
1. Introduction
Salinomycin (SAL) (Figure 1) is an antibiotic that belongs to a large group of polyether ionophores [1]. It has been found that SAL exhibits high antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including mycobacteria and some filamentous fungi [2,3]. Furthermore, salinomycin sodium salt is commonly used in veterinary medicine as a non-hormonal growth promoting as well as anti-coccidiostat agent [4,5]. Where is reference 6, please cite reference in order.
Especial attention has been paid to SAL since 2009, when it was announced that this compound was nearly 100-fold more effective towards the breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) than the commonly used cytostatic drug—Taxol [6]. Extensive research work has been undertaken to explain the unusual anticancer properties of this antibiotic. It has been proved that SAL is capable of inducing programmed cell death (apoptosis) of human cancer cells of various tissues exhibiting multidrug resistance (MDR), for example in the case of leukemic CSCs by expression of ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC) [7]. Moreover, it has been reported that SAL strongly inhibits a proximal Wnt/β-catenin signalling and blocks phosphorylation of the Wnt-LRP6 co-receptor, which leads to its degradation and consequently to apoptosis of cancer cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia [8]. The ability of SAL to reduce the subpopulation of colon adenocarcinoma CSCs and the considerable activity against human colon cancer cells have been also observed. These cells were more affected by SAL than by oxaliplatin, a cytostatic drug commonly used in the anticancer chemotherapy of colorectal cancer [9]. It has been established that SAL causes concentration- and time-dependent reduction in viability of LNM-35 and A-549 human lung cancer cell lines through a caspase cell death pathway, as well as induces a marked increase in the expression of the pro-apoptotic protein NAG-1, which leads to the inhibition of lung cancer cell invasion [10].
SAL blocks the growth and migration of chemo-resistant prostate cancer cells and also causes accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which leads to depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane and cell apoptosis [11]. The inhibitory effect of SAL on the proliferation, migration as well as invasion of human endometrial and nasopharyngeal CSCs has been also documented [12,13]. In addition, the sensitizing effect of SAL has been evidenced upon treatment with cytostatic agents, such as Taxol, Docetaxel, vinblastine and colchicine [14,15,16]. Synergistic anticancer effect of SAL in combination with gemcitabine against human pancreatic cancer cells has been observed [17].
Since 2012 SAL was approved for testing in the screening studies on a small group of patients with invasive carcinoma of the head, neck, breast and ovary. Patients were treated with 200–250 µg/kg of SAL intravenously every second day for three weeks. Two cases were described in literature in detail, in which the therapy of patients with SAL resulted in inhibition of disease progress over an extended period of time. Acute side effects were rare and the serious long-term adverse side effects were not observed [18].
An important direction of research is the chemical modification of SAL, which can lead to derivatives with significantly lower toxicity and with better biological activity than that of unmodified antibiotic, due to favorable changes of ionophoretic properties and the transport of metal cations through the lipid membranes. In our previous works we have proved that chemically modified polyether antibiotics, such as amides and esters, transport metal cations by an electrogenic or biomimetic mechanism, wherein the unmodified ionophores transport metal cations only by an electroneutral mechanism [19,20].
Until now, the synthesis, chemical structure and biological properties of various amides, including diamides, esters and O-acylated derivatives of SAL have been described [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Results of the tests have clearly shown that all SAL derivatives are more or less biologically active in the specified concentration range.
In the preliminary structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies we have demonstrated that the most potent anticancer and antimicrobial compounds among SAL amides are those that contain fluorine atoms in their structure, with or without aliphatic-aromatic, especially N-benzyl, substituents. The present paper describes an efficient method for the synthesis of 12 new mono-substituted N-benzyl amides of SAL with fluorine, chlorine and bromine atoms as well as nitro group in -ortho, -meta and -para positions (Figure 1).
The structures of all SAL mono-substituted N-benzyl amides were characterized using FT-IR and NMR methods and three of them were also evaluated using single crystal X-ray diffraction method. Additionally, their ability to complex monovalent and divalent metal cations was tested using the electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI MS). The in vitro antibacterial activity, especially against MRSA and MRSE, tuberculostatic activity against one standard and two “wild” M. tuberculosis strains as well as the anticancer activity of these compounds against drug-sensitive and drug-resistant human cancer cell lines were determined and discussed.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Salinomycin N-Benzyl Amides
Salinomycin sodium salt (SAL-Na) was isolated from widely available veterinary premix—SACOX® following the procedures described previously [22]. The structure and homogeneity of isolated SAL-Na was confirmed using spectroscopic methods. SAL was obtained from SAL-Na by the extraction with sulfuric acid solution (pH = 1.5) in dichloromethane [22]. The 12 novel mono-substituted N-benzyl amides of SAL containing fluorine, chlorine and bromine atoms as well as nitro group at the -ortho (F-o, Cl-o, Br-o, NO2-o), -meta (F-m, Cl-m, Br-m, NO2-m) and -para (F-p, Cl-p, Br-p, NO2-p) positions were synthesized in the reaction between SAL and appropriate mono-substituted benzyl-amine in the presence of DCC (N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide) as a coupling agent and HOBt (1-hydroxybenzotriazole) as an activator [22]. Additionally, when using mono-substituted benzyl-amine hydrochloride, it was necessary to add an equimolar amount of triethylamine.
All SAL mono-substituted N-benzyl amides can be easily isolated in pure form following the purification by Dry Vacuum Column Chromatography [27], using dichloromethane/THF (100:3) mixture as mobile phase. This method was efficient and gave mono-substituted N-benzyl amides in high yields of up to 67%–84% (Table 1).
Table 1.
Compound | Yield (%) | Analytical NMR Signals (ppm) in CD2Cl2 | Characteristic FT-IR Bands (cm−1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13C(1)=O | 1H-N(amide) | 13C(43) | 1H-C(43) | Amide I | Amide II | ||
F-o | 84 | 175.7 | 6.92 | 40.7 | 4.75 (ddd, J = 20.9, 15.6, 5.9 Hz) | 1660 | 1528 |
F-m | 72 | 175.8 | 6.89 | 42.5 | 4.80 (ddd, J = 20.6, 15.6, 6.1 Hz) | 1658 | 1531 |
F-p | 79 | 175.7 | 6.97 | 42.3 | 4.74 (ddd, J = 20.3, 15.3, 6.0 Hz) | 1651 | 1532 |
Cl-o | 73 | 175.3 | 6.90 | 41.3 | 4.82 (ddd, J = 21.2, 15.8, 5.9 Hz) | 1660 | 1528 |
Cl-m | 80 | 175.8 | 7.15 | 42.4 | 4.81 (ddd, J = 20.5, 15.6, 6.1 Hz) | 1648 | 1530 |
Cl-p | 77 | 175.7 | 7.03 | 42.4 | 4.75 (ddd, J = 20.4, 15.4, 6.1 Hz) | 1658 | 1526 |
Br-o | 71 | 175.8 | 6.98 | 44.0 | 4.73 (dq, J = 16.2, 5.9 Hz) | 1662 | 1528 |
Br-m | 75 | 175.8 | 6.98 | 44.0 | 4.73 (dq, J = 16.0, 5.8 Hz) | 1658 | 1528 |
Br-p | 67 | 175.8 | 7.03 | 42.4 | 4.73 (ddd, J = 20.4, 15.5, 6.0 Hz) | 1658 | 1525 |
NO2-o | 81 | 176.1 | 7.18 | 41.3 | 5.00 (dq, J = 16.4, 6.1 Hz) | 1665 | 1530 |
NO2-m | 69 | 176.2 | 7.37 | 42.4 | 4.94 (ddd, J = 21.0, 15.8, 6.0 Hz) | 1657 | 1532 |
NO2-p | 76 | 176.2 | 7.30 | 42.7 | 4.93 (ddd, J = 21.3, 16.2, 6.1 Hz) | 1660 | 1523 |
The purity and structures of these compounds were determined on the basis of elemental, FT-IR and NMR analysis. The 1H and 13C NMR signals were assigned using one- and two-dimensional (1H-1H COSY, 1H-13C HETCOR, 1H-13C HMBC) spectra. 1H and 13C as well as 2D NMR spectra of selected Br-o amide derivative are included in the Supplementary material (Figures S1–S5). Additionally, the analytical signals in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra as well as the position of characteristic amide I and amide II bands in the FT-IR spectra of all obtained mono-substituted N-benzyl amides of SAL are collected in Table 1. In Figure 2 the FT-IR spectrum of SAL-Na (black dashed line) is compared with that of SAL (red dotted line) and that of Cl-p amide (blue solid line).
The broad bands with the maxima at 3373 cm−1 and 3484 cm−1 in the spectra of SAL-Na and SAL, respectively, correspond to the ν(OH) stretching vibration of three OH groups present in these molecules. Different positions of these bands demonstrate the existence of different hydrogen bonds strength within their structures. Additionally, the spectrum of SAL-Na shows two intense bands with maxima at 1565 cm−1 and 1404 cm−1 assigned to νas(COO−) and νs(COO−) stretching vibrations, respectively. These two bands are absent in the spectrum of SAL and instead, a new broad band with a maximum at 1713 cm−1 assigned to the superposition of ν(C=O) stretching vibration of both ketone and COOH groups is observed. In the spectrum of Cl-p three bands most characteristic of this compound are well visible. The narrow band with a maximum at 3038 cm−1 corresponds to ν(CH)sp2 stretching vibrations, whereas two intense bands with maxima at 1658 cm−1 and 1526 cm−1are assigned to amide I and amide II, respectively.
In the 13C NMR spectra (all performed in CD2Cl2) of mono-substituted N-benzyl amides of SAL the characteristic signal of C(1) atom of the amide group is observed in a very narrow range 175.3–176.2 ppm, while the signals of C(1) atom of SAL-Na and SAL are found at 185.0 ppm and 177.8 ppm, respectively. The characteristic signal of proton of NH(amide) group in the 1H NMR spectra of mono-substituted N-benzyl amides of SAL is in the range of 6.89–7.37 ppm (Table 1).
2.2. X-ray Analysis
Structural data of SAL amides are very important to explain their biological activity and to perform SAR analysis. Therefore, the structures of three crystalline mono-substituted N-benzyl amides (F-o, F-m and NO2-o) were characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction method. Single crystals of F-o and F-m derivatives were obtained by crystallization in the ethanol/water mixture and single crystals of NO2-o, in the form of acetonitrile solvates, were grown by crystallization in acetonitrile.
The crystallographic data and structure refinements of SAL N-benzyl amides F-o, F-m and NO2-o are summarized in Table S1 (Supplementary Materials).
Furthermore their molecular structures are presented in Figure 3. The bond lengths and angles characterizing the geometry of the molecules are presented as supplementary material (Table S2). The absolute configuration of SAL skeleton of these N-benzyl amides is 2R, 4R, 6S, 7R, 8S, 9S, 10S, 12R, 13S, 14S, 16R, 17R, 20R, 21S, 24S, 25R, 28R and 29S, analogously to that found by Kinashi et al. [28,29] for the unmodified SAL. The SAL skeleton contains four six-membered and one five-membered rings. Two six- and one five-membered rings form tricyclic spiroketal rings system, in which the central ring is unsaturated. The environment of the spiro C17 and C19 heads is tetrahedral, so that the junctions between the five- and six-membered and between both six-membered rings are of the spiro type. The C18-C19 bond of the length of 1.317(2), 1.296(2) and 1.298(2) Å in SAL N-benzyl amides F-o, F-m and NO2-o, respectively, has a double bond character. The unsaturated six-membered ring with one double bond (C18=C19) in these amides has envelope conformation, where C21 is out of the plane formed by the other ring atoms by 0.553(3), 0.547(3) and 0.599(3) Å in F-o, F-m and NO2-o, respectively. Both saturated six-membered rings in these SAL derivatives exhibit chair conformation, and the five-membered ring is twisted with C22 out of the plane of the other ring atoms by 0.384(3), 0.385(3) and 0.441(3) Å in F-o, F-m and NO2-o, respectively. The conformations of the rings as well as the C-C and C-O bonds in these SAL derivatives are very similar (Table S2).
The conformation of the SAL skeleton of these three N-benzyl amides, similar to free SAL, exhibits pseudo-cyclic conformation due to the presence of the intramolecular O-H...O and N-H...O hydrogen bonding interactions. In these N-benzyl amides of SAL, the OH groups at C9 and C20 atoms are donors of the hydrogen bonds and the NH group of amides also participate as donor forming N1-H...O3 hydrogen bonds with similar geometries (Table 2).
Table 2.
D-H···A | D-H | H···A | D···A | D-H···A |
---|---|---|---|---|
F-o | ||||
O3-H···O8 | 0.82 (2) | 2.27 (2) | 3.016 (2) | 152 (2) |
O7-H···O8 | 0.82 (2) | 2.31 (2) | 2.728 (2) | 113 (1) |
O7-H···O9 | 0.82 (2) | 2.26 (2) | 3.075 (2) | 172 (2) |
O10-H···O1 i | 0.82 (2) | 2.27 (2) | 3.017 (2) | 152 (1) |
N1-H···O3 | 0.86 (2) | 2.46 (2) | 3.166 (2) | 139 (2) |
F-m | ||||
O3-H···O8 | 0.82 (2) | 2.28 (2) | 3.013 (2) | 150 (2) |
O7-H···O8 | 0.82 (2) | 2.40 (2) | 2.700 (2) | 103 (1) |
O7-H···O9 | 0.82 (2) | 2.36 (2) | 3.147 (2) | 161 (1) |
O10-H···O1 j | 0.82 (2) | 2.17 (2) | 2.980 (2) | 172 (2) |
N1-H···O3 | 0.86 (2) | 2.25 (2) | 3.048 (2) | 155 (2) |
NO2-o | ||||
O3-H···O8 | 0.82 (2) | 2.45 (2) | 3.066 (2) | 133 (1) |
O7-H···O8 | 0.82 (2) | 2.26 (2) | 2.728 (2) | 117 (1) |
O7-H···O9 | 0.82 (2) | 2.13 (2) | 2.873 (2) | 151 (1) |
O10-H···O1 k | 0.82 (2) | 2.10 (2) | 2.789 (2) | 141 (1) |
N1-H···O3 | 0.86 (2) | 2.27 (2) | 3.013 (2) | 145 (1) |
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z; (j) x, y+1, z; (k) x−1, y, z.
Beside these three intramolecular hydrogen bonds, which are more linear than the fourth intramolecular O7-H...O8 hydrogen bond, because the OH group at the C20 atom forms a bifurcated hydrogen bond (O7-H...O8 and O7-H...O9). The oppositely polarized atoms of SAL of these benzyl amides are responsible for the folding of the skeleton, and as a result, the intramolecular hydrogen bonds are formed to stabilize the pseudo-cyclic conformation. In this conformation of SAL skeleton of these benzyl amides the exterior surface is hydrophobic, and the interior is hydrophilic. In the crystal structure of the compounds studied, the OH group (O10) is at C28 and the carbonyl group (C=O) is at C1, which leads to interactions between the molecules in the crystals. Thus the OH group at C28 is a donor, whereas the carbonyl group at C1 is an acceptor in the intermolecular hydrogen bonds with the neighbors. The intermolecular O-H...O hydrogen bonding interactions between the oppositely polarized OH and carbonyl groups, together with the van der Waals forces, are responsible for organization of molecules in the crystals (Figure S6).
2.3. ESI MS Evaluation of Ionophoretic Ability
The intracellular and extracellular concentration gradients of metal cations are essential for normal cell functioning [30]. Therefore, the biological properties of SAL are related to its ability to complex metal cations and transport them across the lipid membranes from the external environment into the cell. The coordinated ions are released there, which results in a disruption of the natural Na+/K+ concentration gradient and intracellular pH change, leading to mitochondrial injury, cell swelling, vacuolization and, finally, programmed cell death (apoptosis) [31].
For this reason, the complexation ability of the new mono-substituted benzyl amides of SAL towards monovalent (Li+, Na+, K+, Rb+ and Cs+) as well as divalent (Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+) cations was studied using ESI MS technique. The exemplary ESI MS spectra of Cl-m complexes with all of these mono- and divalent cations are included in the Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively.
Results of these studies clearly showed that mono-substituted SAL N-benzyl amides formed 1:1 complexes with both mono- and divalent metal cations, wherein the chemically unmodified SAL formed complexes with monovalent metal cations only. This indicates that the chemical modification of SAL has considerable influence on the ionophoretic properties of this antibiotic.
2.4. Anticancer in Vitro Activity
The most important aim of the study was to determine the biological activity of the obtained compounds, especially their anticancer activity. MDR of cancer cells is actually one of the greatest problems in the application of chemotherapy and in effective fight against neoplastic diseases. For this reason, all novel mono-substituted N-benzyl amides of SAL were tested against four human cancer cell lines, including two drug-resistant cell lines.
The tests were performed on promyelocytic leukemia cells and its vincristine-resistant subline (HL-60 and HL-60/vinc, respectively) as well as colon adenocarcinoma cells and its doxorubicin-resistant subline (LoVo and LoVo/dx, respectively). Additionally, the toxicity of these compounds was also tested against normal murine embryonic fibroblasts (BALB/3T3). The reference compounds in these studies were two commonly used anticancer agents—cisplatin and doxorubicin. The concentrations (in µM) of the individual compounds, at which the 50% growth inhibition of cancer cells were observed, are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
Compound | Cancer Cells | Normal Cells | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL-60 | HL-60/vinc | LoVo | LoVo/dx | BALB/3T3 | ||
SAL | 0.33 ± 0.12 | 2.33 ± 0.12 | 0.47 ± 0.08 | 0.81 ± 0.32 | 13.02 ± 7.90 | |
F-o | 3.63 ± 0.14 | 4.44 ± 1.73 | 3.49 ± 0.59 | 2.32 ± 0.69 | 5.97 ± 2.07 | |
F-m | 64.95 ± 35.32 | NA | 13.53 ± 0.28 | 3.91 ± 2.10 | 6.46 ± 1.11 | |
F-p | 3.60 ± 0.69 | 11.79 ± 2.56 | 6.18 ± 0.91 | 3.29 ± 0.91 | 8.63 ± 1.96 | |
Cl-o | 3.18 ± 0.69 | 3.99 ± 1.47 | 3.85 ± 0.05 | 2.91 ± 0.22 | 6.00 ± 2.26 | |
Cl-m | 3.83 ± 0.09 | 6.59 ± 1.22 | 11.62 ± 5.12 | 2.96 ± 0.99 | 17.34 ± 8.94 | |
Cl-p | 36.19 ± 3.03 | 46.81 ± 12.45 | 19.27 ± 4.03 | 16.58 ± 4.81 | 7.62 ± 1.44 | |
Br-o | 3.13 ± 0.71 | 4.80 ± 1.48 | 3.64 ± 0.07 | 2.87 ± 0.29 | 6.51 ± 3.23 | |
Br-m | 3.38 ± 1.09 | 7.08 ± 1.73 | 5.23 ± 0.22 | 3.39 ± 0.15 | 9.25 ± 1.84 | |
Br-p | 20.66 ± 4.66 | 33.52 ± 10.88 | 16.29 ± 0.96 | 4.97 ± 2.76 | 8.39 ± 2.70 | |
NO2-o | 3.47 ± 0.44 | 6.84 ± 2.04 | 3.81 ± 0.18 | 2.45 ± 0.26 | 9.55 ± 2.81 | |
NO2-m | 8.78 ± 1.73 | 24.57 ± 8.00 | 16.15 ± 1.61 | 3.26 ± 0.84 | 24.91 ± 2.42 | |
NO2-p | NA | NA | 13.30 ± 1.94 | 20.40 ± 8.63 | 6.91 ± 1.86 | |
doxorubicin | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.88 ± 0.26 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 5.46 ± 1.56 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | |
cisplatin | 1.00 ± 0.23 | 6.87 ± 1.63 | 3.70 ± 1.20 | 5.20 ± 1.93 | 5.30 ± 2.93 |
The IC50 value is defined as the concentration of a compound that corresponds to a 50% growth inhibition. Human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) and its vincristine-resistant subline (HL-60/vinc); human colon adenocarcinoma cell line (LoVo) and doxorubicin resistant subline (LoVo/dx); normal murine embryonic fibroblast cell line (BALB/3T3). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD; NA: not active in concentrations used (up to 100 µg/mL).
As follows from these data, all the compounds tested are more or less active in the specified concentration range depended on the tested cell line. SAL derivatives broke (strongly or moderately) the MDR of cancer cells used and this process depended on the chemical nature of SAL derivatives. The most active in these tests were chemically unmodified SAL (IC50 = 0.33–2.33 µM) and its four N-benzyl amides: F-o, Cl-o, Br-o and NO2-o (IC50 = 2.32–6.84 µM). Very interesting is the activity of SAL derivatives against drug-resistant cell lines, especially against LoVo/dx cancer cell line. This activity in almost all cases was higher than that of the reference compounds, particularly for F-o and NO2-o (IC50 = 2.32 µM and 2.45 µM, respectively). Results of these studies indicate that these derivatives exhibit preferential activity against doxorubicin-resistant colon adenocarcinoma cells. Simultaneously, SAL and its derivatives were less toxic (IC50 = 5.97–24.91 µM) against normal murine embryonic fibroblasts than commonly used cytostatic drugs—cisplatin and doxorubicin.
For better determination of the ability to MDR breaking and toxicity against normal cells, the indexes of resistance (IR) and selectivity index (SI) values were calculated and are collected in Table 4.
Table 4.
Compound | HL-60 | HL-60/vinc | LoVo | LoVo/DX | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SI | SI | IR | SI | SI | IR | |
SAL | 39.45 | 5.59 | 7.06 | 27.70 | 16.07 | 1.72 |
F-o | 1.64 | 1.34 | 1.22 | 1.71 | 2.57 | 0.66 |
F-m | 0.10 | - | - | 0.48 | 1.65 | 0.29 |
F-p | 2.40 | 0.73 | 3.28 | 1.40 | 2.62 | 0.53 |
Cl-o | 1.89 | 1.50 | 1.25 | 1.56 | 2.06 | 0.76 |
Cl-m | 4.52 | 2.63 | 1.72 | 1.49 | 5.86 | 0.25 |
Cl-p | 0.21 | 0.16 | 1.29 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.86 |
Br-o | 2.08 | 1.36 | 1.53 | 1.79 | 2.27 | 0.79 |
Br-m | 2.74 | 1.31 | 2.09 | 1.77 | 2.73 | 0.65 |
Br-p | 0.41 | 0.25 | 1.62 | 0.52 | 1.69 | 0.30 |
NO2-o | 2.75 | 1.40 | 1.97 | 2.51 | 3.90 | 0.64 |
NO2-m | 2.84 | 1.01 | 2.80 | 1.54 | 7.64 | 0.20 |
NO2-p | - | - | - | 0.52 | 0.34 | 1.53 |
doxorubicin | 4.50 | 0.20 | 22.00 | 1.20 | 0.03 | 36.40 |
cisplatin | 5.30 | 0.77 | 6.87 | 1.43 | 1.02 | 1.41 |
The IR and SI values were calculated for each compounds using formula: RI = IC50 for drug-resistant cell line/IC50 for appropriate drug-sensitive cell line; SI = IC50 for normal cell line (BALB/3T3)/IC50 for respective cancerous cell line.
The IR values indicate how many times a resistant subline is chemo-resistant relative to its parental cell line. When IR is 0–2 the cells are sensitive to the compound tested; IR from the range 2–10 means that the cell shows moderate sensitivity to a given drug; IR above 10 indicates strong drug-resistance. Results of these studies indicated that almost all SAL derivatives strongly break MDR of tested cell lines, much stronger than unmodified SAL, as well as cisplatin and doxorubicin. This overcoming is especially high for LoVo/dx cell line (IR = 0.20–0.86, except for NO2-p with IR = 1.53), which confirms the high efficiency of derivatives obtained against this cell line.
A beneficial SI > 1.0 indicates a drug with efficacy against cancer cells greater than toxicity against normal cells. In most cases SAL derivatives were found more selective against cancer cells than against normal cells of the body. What is interesting, the best results were obtained once again against doxorubicin-resistant colon adenocarcinoma cells (SI = 1.65–7.64, except Cl-p and NO2-p). Additionally, the values of SI coefficient in almost all cases were much higher than for two reference compounds used in the tests.
2.5. Antibacterial in Vitro Activity
Chemically unmodified SAL and its mono-substituted N-benzyl amides were subjected to tests of their antimicrobial activity against different strains of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, especially against MRSA and MRSE. This activity was evaluated by two parameters: GIZ (Growth Inhibition Zone) and MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration). MRSA strains are resistant to all β-lactams as well as some other and widely used antibiotics. One of the few effective anti-MRSA compounds is ciprofloxacin. Therefore, this compound was used as a reference in the tests.
Among all tested compounds only SAL and two amide derivatives F-p and NO2-p were found active, however, their activity concerned only standard strains of Gram-positive bacteria (Table 5) as well as MRSA and MRSE (Table 6).
Table 5.
Bacterial Strains | SAL | F-p | NO2-p | ciprofloxacin | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIZ | MIC | GIZ | MIC | GIZ | MIC | GIZ | MIC | |
S. aureus ATCC 4163 | 30 | 2 | 18 | 32 | un | 128 | 26 | 0.25 |
S. aureus ATCC 25923 | 29 | 2 | 19 | 32 | un | 128 | 26 | 0.5 |
S. aureus ATCC 6538 | 34 | 2 | 19 | 16 | un | 128 | 28 | 0.25 |
S. aureus ATCC 29213 | 28 | 4 | 20 | 32 | un | 128 | 22 | 0.5 |
S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 | 34 | 2 | 20 | 16 | un | 128 | 30 | 0.25 |
S. epidermidis ATCC 35984 | 33 | 2 | 18 | 32 | un | 128 | 32 | 0.125 |
un: unmeasurable.
Table 6.
Staphylococcus Strains | SAL | F-p | NO2-p | Ciprofloxacin |
---|---|---|---|---|
MIC | MIC | MIC | MIC | |
Hospital strains of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) | ||||
452/11 | 16 | 16 | 128 | 32 |
456/11 | 16 | 16 | 128 | 32 |
462/11 | 16 | 32 | 128 | 64 |
514/11 | 8 | 32 | 128 | 32 |
522/12 | 16 | 32 | 128 | 32 |
537/12 | 16 | 32 | 256 | 64 |
572/12 | 16 | 32 | 128 | 64 |
573/12 | 16 | 64 | 256 | 32 |
585/12 | 16 | 32 | 256 | 64 |
586/12 | 16 | 64 | 256 | 64 |
Hospital strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) | ||||
459/11 | 16 | 32 | 128 | 16 |
460/11 | 16 | 32 | 128 | 0.125 |
461/11 | 16 | 32 | 256 | 0.25 |
466/11 | 8 | 16 | 256 | 2 |
467/11 | 16 | 64 | 128 | 16 |
468/11 | 16 | 64 | 128 | 16 |
469/11 | 16 | 64 | 256 | 8 |
470/11 | 16 | 32 | 256 | 0.125 |
488/11 | 16 | 128 | 256 | 16 |
489/11 | 16 | 32 | 256 | 0.25 |
None of the tested compounds, including unmodified SAL, was active against Gram-negative bacteria and fungi of the Candida genus (GIZ = 10–12 mm and MIC ≥ 256 µg/mL). This result has been explained by much greater complexity of the structure of Gram-negative bacteria cell wall. The outer membrane of these bacteria is impermeable to hydrophobic compounds, such as ionophores, and their complexes [32].
Staphylococcus aureus is a species of bacteria commonly encountered on the skin and/or mucous membranes of the nose of healthy people, which is harmless, but when it gets into the human body can cause serious blood, bone or joints infections. MRSA is the strain of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin and other penicillin type antibiotics [33] and is now a very serious problem in hospitals worldwide. It is noteworthy that the activity of F-p against MRSA was comparable to the activity of ciprofloxacin and in some cases was even higher than activity of the reference compound (MIC = 16–64 µg/mL and 32–64 µg/mL for F-p and ciprofloxacin, respectively). Simultaneously, antibacterial activity of NO2-p is much lower than that of F-p in the tests performed.
2.6. Tuberculostatic in Vitro Activity
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), besides HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis is the greatest killer worldwide. This disease, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria strains [34], is particularly dangerous for people with weakened immune systems, such as people living with HIV, malnutrition, or diabetes. Simultaneously, very serious problem is the risk of the extensive drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis, caused by mycobacteria resistant to at least rifampicin and isoniazid as well as to any member of the quinolone group and at least one of the following second-line anti-TB injectable drugs: kanamycin, capreomycin, or amikacin [35]. Therefore, it is important to search for new drugs, which will be effective, both against sensitive as well as resistant tuberculosis strains.
It is worth noting that there is no information about the antituberculosis properties of SAL and its derivatives in the scientific literature. For this reason chemically unmodified antibiotic and its mono-substituted benzyl amides were examined in vitro against M. tuberculosis standard H37Rv strain as well as two “wild” strains isolated from tuberculosis patients: one (spec. 210) resistant to p-aminosalicylic acid, isonicotinic acid hydrazide, etambutol and rifampicine, and the other (spec. 192) sensitive to the administered antituberculosis drugs (Table 7). The reference compound in the tests was isoniazid.
Table 7.
Compound | M. tuberculosis Strains | ||
---|---|---|---|
Standard H37Rv Strain | Isoniazid-Sensitive Strain | Isoniazid-Resistant Strain | |
SAL | 25 | 25 | 50 |
F-o | 100 | 50 | 100 |
F-m | 100 | >100 | >100 |
F-p | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Cl-o | 100 | 50 | >100 |
Cl-m | 100 | >100 | >100 |
Cl-p | 100 | 100 | >100 |
Br-o | >100 | >100 | >100 |
Br-m | >100 | >100 | >100 |
Br-p | 50 | 50 | 100 |
NO2-o | 50 | 50 | 100 |
NO2-m | 100 | 100 | >100 |
NO2-p | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Isoniazid | <3.1 | <3.1 | 6.25 |
The tests performed clearly showed that N-benzyl amides of SAL exhibited low tuberculostatic activity with MIC ranged from 50 µg/mL to more than 100 µg/mL. For comparison, the MIC values were in the range of 25–50 µg/mL and about 3.1–6.25 µg/mL for SAL and isoniazid, respectively. Among SAL derivatives obtained, the most active in these tests were F-p and NO2-p amides (MIC = 50 µg/mL against standard and “wild” strains of M. tuberculosis). The least active compounds were Br-o and Br-m derivatives (MIC > 100 µg/mL in all cases).
2.7. Structure-Activity Relationship
The relationship between the chemical structure of SAL derivatives and their biological activity is expected to identify the functional groups, which induce high biological activity and thus to help design more effective chemical modifications of SAL. This relation is also vital for the synthesis of compounds, which could be used not only in veterinary medicine, but also for example in human medicine.
Detailed analysis of the obtained data has revealed that the most anticancer active derivatives are those substituted at the -ortho position. This rule applies to all tested cell lines, both drug-sensitive as well as drug-resistant cancer cells. Secondly, the least anticancer active are the derivatives substituted at the -para position. The exception to this rule is F-p, whose activity is much higher than that of F-m amide (IC50 = 3.60 µM and IC50 = 64.95 µM against HL-60 cell line for F-p and F-m, respectively, as well as IC50 = 6.18 µM and IC50 = 13.53 µM against LoVo cell line for F-p and F-m, respectively). Only when tested against LoVo/dx cell line, the activity of these two compounds is high and comparable (IC50 = 3.29 µM and IC50 = 3.91 µM for F-p and F-m, respectively). Moreover, the results of anticancer activity studies indicate that all benzyl derivatives, except Cl-p and NO2-p, exhibit preferential activity against LoVo/dx cell line and this activity is higher than that of two commonly cytostatic drugs—cisplatin and doxorubicin (IC50 = 2.32–4.97 µM, IC50 = 5.20 µM and IC50 = 5.46 µM for mono-substituted benzyl amides, cisplatin and doxorubicin, respectively). The least harmful to normal cells are the derivatives substituted at the -meta position. This applies to the entire series of these compounds only with one exception—the least cytotoxic compound among fluorinated amides is F-p (IC50 = 5.97 µM, IC50 = 6.46 µM and IC50 = 8.63 µM for F-o, F-m as well as F-p, respectively). For all derivatives this activity is lower than that of the reference compounds (IC50 = 5.97–24.91 µM, IC50 = 5.30 µM and IC50 = 0.18 µM for mono-substituted N-benzyl amides, cisplatin and doxorubicin, respectively).
Among all amides of SAL, only F-p and NO2-p derivatives showed antimicrobial activity against standard strains of Gram-positive bacteria (MIC = 16–32 µg/mL and MIC = 128 µg/mL for F-p and NO2-p, respectively) as well as MRSA and MRSE (MIC = 16–128 µg/mL and 128–256 µg/mL for F-p and NO2-p, respectively). These great differences in biological activity of the compounds investigated may be connected with the Warburg effect and/or with different mechanisms of ion transport by polyether antibiotics, including SAL. Three different ion transport mechanisms through the cell membranes realized by polyether antibiotics are described in literature: (a) electroneutral transport, when the transmembrane potential is maintained; (b) electrogenic transport, when the transmembrane potential is changed and (c) biomimetic transport implemented by polyether antibiotics with the chemically modified COOH group, such as mono-substituted N-benzyl amides of SAL [19,20].
The Warburg effect is observed in most cancer cells, which predominantly produce energy by a high rate of glycolysis followed by lactic acid fermentation in the cytosol, rather than by a comparatively low rate of glycolysis followed by oxidation of pyruvate in mitochondria. It has been postulated that this change in metabolism is the fundamental cause of cancer diseases [36].
In parallel, high anticancer activity of SAL derivatives is probably associated with the mechanism of cations transport realized by such compounds. In cancer cells that are highly acidic, the most common electroneutral transport cannot be effectively carried out, because the COOH group does not undergo deprotonation. Biomimetic transport is then preferred. On the contrary, in bacterial cells the electroneutral or electrogenic transport of ions is preferred and hence much lower antimicrobial than anticancer activity of the SAL derivatives tested. This conclusion is confirmed by the fact that the most tuberculostatic active agent is SAL and its two N-benzyl amides only: NO2-p and F-p (MIC = 50 µg/mL in all cases). What is interesting, exactly the same derivatives proved to be active in the antibacterial tests. Detailed analysis of anti-tuberculosis activity implies the following conclusions.
Firstly, the most active are the derivatives substituted at the -para position. The only exception to this rule is Cl-o compound, which is about 2-fold more active than the corresponding Cl-p amide (MIC = 50 µg/mL and MIC = 100 µg/mL against isoniazid-sensitive M. tuberculosis strain, respectively).
Secondly, the least tuberculostatic active are the derivatives substituted at the -meta position and this applies to the entire series of compounds obtained (MIC > 100 µg/mL in most cases).
Thirdly, the activity against normal H37Rv strain of all SAL N-benzyl amides is comparable with that against isoniazid-sensitive strain (MIC = 50–100 µg/mL) and, simultaneously, much higher against isoniazid-resistant strain (MIC > 100 µg/mL in most cases).
3. Experimental Section
3.1. General
All precursors for the synthesis (amines) and solvents were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Fluka (St. Louis, MO, USA) and were used as received without further purification. CD2Cl2 spectral grade solvent was stored over 3 Å molecular sieves for several days. All manipulations with the substances were performed in a carefully dried and CO2-free glove box. TLC was carried out on precoated plates (TLC silica gel 60 F254, Aluminum Plates, Merck (Dormstadt, Germany) and spots were detected by illumination with an UV lamp and visualized with iodine. All the solvent used in flash chromatography were of HPLC grade (CHROMASOLV from Sigma Aldrich) and were used as received. The elemental analysis of SAL and its N-benzyl amides were carried out on Vario ELIII (Elementar, Hanau, Germany).
3.2. Spectroscopic Measurements
The 1H and 13C spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance DRX 600 spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Gemany). 1H NMR measurements of SAL and its N-benzyl amides (0.07 mol·dm−3) in CD2Cl2 were carried out at the operating frequency 600.055 MHz; flip angle, pw = 45°, spectral width, sw = 4500 Hz; acquisition time, at = 2.0 s; relaxation delay, d1 = 1.0 s; T = 293.0 K and using TMS as the internal standard. No window function or zero filling was used. Digital resolution was 0.2 Hz per point. The error of the chemical shift value was 0.01 ppm. The 13C NMR spectra were recorded at the operating frequency 150.899 MHz; pw = 60°; sw = 19.000 Hz; at = 1.8 s; d1 = 1.0 s; T = 293.0 K and TMS as the internal standard. Line broadening parameters were 0.5 or 1 Hz. The error of chemical shift value was 0.1 ppm. All spectra were locked to deuterium resonance of CD2Cl2.
The 1H and 13C NMR signals were assigned using 2D (1H-1H COSY, 1H-13C HETCOR, 1H-13C HMBC) spectra shown in the Supplementary Material. 2D spectra were recorded using standard pulse sequences from Varian and Bruker pulse-sequence libraries.
The FT-IR spectra of SAL and its N-benzyl amides in the mid infrared region were recorded in KBr. A cell with Si windows and wedge-shaped layers was used to avoid interferences (mean layer thickness 170 mm). The spectra were taken on an IFS 113v FT-IR spectrophotometer (Bruker) equipped with a DTGS detector; resolution 2 cm−1, NSS = 64. The HappeGenzel apodization function was used.
The ESI (Electrospray Ionization) mass spectra were recorded on a Waters/Micromass (Manchester, UK) ZQ mass spectrometer equipped with a Harvard Apparatus syringe pump. The samples ware prepared in dry acetonitrile (5 × 10−5 mol·dm−3). The sample was infused into the ESI source using a Harvard pump at a flow rate of 20 mL·min−1. The ESI source potentials were: capillary 3 kV, lens 0.5 kV, extractor 4 V. The standard ESI mass spectra were recorded at the cone voltages: 10 and 30 V. The source temperature was 120 °C and the desolvation temperature was 300 °C. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizing and desolvation gas at flow-rates of 100 dm3·h−1. Mass spectra were acquired in the positive ion detection mode with unit mass resolution at a step of 1 m/z unit. The mass range for ESI experiments was from m/z = 300 to m/z = 1100.
3.3. X-ray Measurement
A colorless single crystal of F-o, F-m and NO2-o was used for data collection on a four circle KUMA KM-4 diffractometer equipped with a two dimensional CCD detector. The graphite monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and the ω-scan technique (Δω = 1.0°) were used for data collection. Data collection and reduction along with the absorption correction were performed using CrysAliss software package [37]. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97 program [38] revealing positions of almost all non-hydrogen atoms. The remaining atoms were located from difference Fourier maps. The hydrogen atoms of CH, CH2 and CH3 groups were constrained with a distance of 0.97 Å and Uiso = 1.5 Ueq of C joined H. The hydrogen atom of OH groups was also constrained with a distance of 0.82 Å. Visualization of the structure was made with the Diamond 3.1 program [39]. Details on the crystal data, data collection parameters and final refinement parameters are collected in Table S1. Selected geometrical parameters are listed in Table S2. Full details on data collection and refinement, fractional atomic coordinates, anisotropic displacement parameters and full list of bond lengths and angles of the crystal structures of F-o, F-m and NO2-o in CIF format have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, No. CCDC 1006247, 1006248 and 1006249 for F-o, F-m and NO2-o, respectively. Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: +44-1223-336-033; email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or www: http:/www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
3.4. Synthesis
3.4.1. Isolation of SAL-Na
SAL-Na was isolated from Sacox®120 microGranulate an anticoccidial feed additive distributed by Huvepharma Polska. 100 g of permix was dissolved in dichloromethane. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude obtained product was purified by Dry Vacuum Column Chromatography [27] (gradient solvent mixture hexane/dichloromethane) giving 6 g pure SAL-Na. The spectroscopic data of SAL-Na were in agreement with previously published assignments [22].
3.4.2. Synthesis of SAL
SAL-Na was dissolved in dichloromethane and stirred vigorously with a layer of aqueous sulfuric acid (pH = 1.5). The organic layer containing SAL was washed with distilled water, and then dichloromethane was evaporated under reduced pressure to dryness giving SAL. The spectroscopic data of SAL data were in agreement with previously published assignments [22].
3.4.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of SAL Mono-Substituted N-benzyl Amides
To a mixture of SAL (500 mg, 0.66 mmol) in dichloromethane (15 mL) the following compounds were added: DCC (206 mg, 1.0 mmol), HOBt (45 mg, 0.33 mmol) and corresponding monosubstituted benzyl amine (2.0 mmol). The mixture was first stirred at a temperature below 0 °C for 6 h and then for further 18 h at room temperature. The solvent was subsequently evaporated under reduced pressure to dryness. The residue was suspended in hexane and filtered off. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified chromatographically on silica gel (Fluka type 60) to give mono-substituted benzyl amides of SAL (yield from 67% to 84%, see Table 1) as a white solid state. The 1H, 13C as well as 2D NMR spectra of selected Br-o amide of SAL are included in the Supplementary material.
3.5. Antiproliferative Activity of SAL and Its Derivatives
Four human cancer cell lines and one normal cell line were used to evaluate anticancer activity of SAL and its N-benzyl amides: human acute promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) and its vincristine resistant subline (HL-60/vinc), human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines sensitive (LoVo) and resistant to doxorubicin (LoVo/dx) as well as also normal murine embryonic fibroblast cell line (BALB/3T3). The BALB/3T3 cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC Rockville, MD, USA), HL-60 cell line from European Type Culture Collection by courtesy of Professor Spik and Dr Mazurier (Laboratory of Biological Chemistry USTL, Lille, France) and HL-60/vinc, LoVo and LoVo/dx by courtesy of Prof. E. Borowski (Technical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland). All the cell lines are maintained in the Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy (IIET), Wrocław, Poland.
Human leukemia cells were cultured in ISCOVE medium (IIET, Wroclaw, Polond) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM l-glutamine (Sigma Aldrich) and 1 µg/100 mL doxorubicin for HL-60/vinc (Sigma Aldrich). Human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines were cultured in mixture of OptiMEM and RPMI 1640 (1:1) medium (IIET) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 2 mM l-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma Aldrich) and 10 µg/100 mL doxorubicin for LoVo/dx (Sigma Aldrich). Murine embryonic fibroblast cells were cultured in Dulbecco medium (Gibco, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 2 mM l-glutamine (Sigma Aldrich). All culture media contained antibiotics: 100 U/mL penicillin (Sigma Aldrich) and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Polfa-Tarchomin, City, Poland). All cell lines were cultured during entire experiment in humid atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
3.5.1. The Anticancer Assays in Vitro
Twenty four hours before adding the tested compounds all cell lines were seeded in 96-well plates (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) in appropriate media with 104 cells per well. All cell lines were exposed to each tested agent at four different concentrations from the range 100 to 0.1 µg/mL for 72 h. The cells were also exposed to the reference drugs: cisplatin (Accord, London, UK) and doxorubicin hydrochloride (Fluka, St. Louis, MO, USA). Additionally, all cell lines were exposed to DMSO (the solvent used for tested compounds, Sigma Aldrich) at the concentrations corresponding to those in the tested agent dilutions. For adherent cells sulphorodamine B assay was performed and MTT assay for leukemia cells.
3.5.2. SRB
After 72 h of incubation with tested compounds the cells were fixed in situ by gently adding of 50 µL per well of cold 50% trichloroacetic acid TCA (Avantor Performance Materials, City, Poland) and were incubated at 4 °C for 1 h. Then the wells were washed four times with water and air-dried. Next, 50 µL of 0.2% solution of sulphorodamine B (Sigma Aldrich) in 1% acetic acid (Avantor Performance Materials) were added to each well and plates were incubated at room temperature for 0.5 h. After incubation time, unbound dye was removed by washing plates four times with 1% acetic acid, whereas the stain bound to cells was solubilized with 150 µL of 10 mM Tris base (Sigma Aldrich). Absorbance of each solution was read at Synergy H4 photometer (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) at 540 nm wavelength.
3.5.3. MTT
Proliferation inhibition of leukemia cells by tested compounds was measured by means of MTT assay. Thus, 20 µL of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide solution (Sigma Aldrich) were added to each well and plates were left in cell incubator for 4 h to allow the cells to metabolize yellow MTT to blue formazan. Then, the lysing mixture consisting of 225 mL dimethylformamide, 67.5 g sodium dodecyl sulfate (both from Sigma Aldrich) and 275 mL of distilled water was added in 80 µL volume per well. Plates were incubated for 24 h for the formazan crystals to be released from cells, dissolved and then absorbance of each well was read at Synergy H4 photometer (BioTek Instruments) at 570 nm wavelength.
Results are presented as mean IC50 (concentration of the tested compound that inhibits cell proliferation by 50%) ± standard deviation. IC50 values were calculated in Cheburator 1.0.2, Dmitry Nevozhay software for each experiment. Compounds at each concentration were tested in triplicates in single experiment and each experiment was repeated at least three times independently. Results are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4. The IR was defined as the ratio of IC50 for a given compound calculated for resistant cell line to that measured for its parental drug sensitive cell line (Table 4).
3.6. Antimicrobial Activity of SAL and Its Derivatives
Microorganisms used in this study were as follows: Gram-positive cocci: S. aureus NCTC 4163, S. aureus ATCC 25923, S. aureus ATCC 6538, S. aureus ATCC 29213, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, S. epidermidis ATCC 35984, Gram-negative rods: E. coli ATCC 10538, E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli NCTC 8196, P. vulgaris NCTC 4635, P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442, P. aeruginosa NCTC 6749, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27863, B. bronchiseptica ATCC 4617 and yeasts: C. albicans ATCC 10231, C. albicans ATCC 90028, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019. The other microorganisms used were obtained from the collection of the Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Antibacterial activity was examined by the disc-diffusion method under standard conditions using Mueller-Hinton II agar medium (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) according to CLSI (previously NCCLS) guidelines [40]. Antifungal activities were assessed using Muellere Hinton agar + 2% glucose and 0.5 mg/mL Methylene Blue Dye Medium [41].
Sterile filter paper discs (9 mm diameter, Whatman No. 3 chromatography paper) were dripped with tested compound solutions (in EtOH) to load 400 mg of a given compound per disc. Dry discs were placed on the surface of appropriate agar medium. The results (diameter of the growth inhibition zone, GIZ) were read after 18 h of incubation at 35 °C.
Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was tested by the twofold serial microdilution method (in 96-well microtiter plates) using Mueller-Hinton Broth medium (Beckton Dickinson) according to CLSI guidelines [42]. The stock solution of a tested agent was prepared in EtOH and diluted in sterile water. Concentrations of tested agents ranged from 0.0625 to 512 µg/mL. The final inoculums of all studied microorganisms were 105 CFU·mL−1 (colony forming units per mL). Minimal inhibitory concentrations (the lowest concentration of a tested agent that prevents visible growth of a microorganism) were read after 18 h of incubation at 35 °C.
3.7. Tuberculostatic Activity of SAL and Its Derivatives
Investigation was performed by the classical test-tube method of successive dilution in Youmans’ modification of Proskauer and Beck’s liquid medium containing 10% of bovine serum [43,44]. Bacterial suspensions were prepared from 14-day-old cultures of slowly growing strains [45,46]. Solutions of the compounds in DMSO were tested. Stock solutions contained 10 mg of compounds in 1 mL. Dilutions (in geometric progression) were prepared in Youmans’ medium. The medium containing no investigated substances and isoniazid as a reference drug was used for comparison. Incubation was performed at a temperature of 37 °C. The MIC values were determined as minimum concentration inhibiting the growth of tested tuberculous strains in relation to the probe with no tested compound. The influence of the compound on the growth of bacteria at certain concentrations 3.1, 6.2, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL was evaluated.
4. Conclusions
Twelve novel mono-substituted N-benzyl amides of SAL containing fluorine, chlorine, bromine and nitro substituents at the -ortho, -meta and -para positions were synthesised and characterized by spectroscopic and spectrometric methods. The anticancer activities against two drug-sensitive and two drug-resistant cancer cell lines, as well as antibacterial activities of these amides were tested to get the structure-activity relationships. The most active, except one compound, were N-benzyl amides of SAL substituted in -ortho position and the least anticancer active derivatives were those substituted at the -para position. Furthermore, almost all SAL N-benzyl amides were proved less toxic against normal cells than the commonly used cytostatic agents—cisplatin and doxorubicin. On the other hand, only two of the compounds tested F-p and NO2-p were active against standard strains of Gram-positive bacteria as well as MRSA and MRSE hospital strains. Additionally, the antitubercular activity of SAL derivatives (especially substituted at the -para position) was determined for the first time. Further optimizations of SAL derivatives should be carried out to discover those having potent higher anticancer activity against human cancer cell lines.
Acknowledgments
Financial support by grant of the Polish National Science Centre (NCN)—No. 2011/03/D/ST5/05884 is gratefully acknowledged. Michał Antoszczak received the financial resources for their doctoral thesis from the Polish National Science Centre (NCN) in the framework of a doctoral scholarship funding—No. DEC-2014/12/T/ST5/00710.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be accessed at: http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/19/12/19435/s1.
Author Contributions
M.A. carried out of the synthetic work, interpreted the results and cooperated in the preparation of the manuscript. A.H. gave the concepts of work, interpreted the results and prepared the manuscript. J.S., A.N. and E.A.-K. performed the antibacterial activity evaluations. E.M. and J.W. performed the anticancer activity evaluations. J.J. performed the X-ray analyses. B.B. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed with valuable discussions and scientific input and approved the final version.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Sample Availability: Samples of the all compounds are available from the authors.
References
- 1.Huczyński A. Salinomycin—A new cancer drug candidate. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2012;79:235–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Naujokat C., Fuchs D., Opelz G. Salinomycin in cancer: A new mission for an old agent. Mol. Med. Rep. 2010;3:555–559. doi: 10.3892/mmr_00000296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mahmoudi N., de Julian-Ortiz J.V., Ciceron L., Galvez J., Mazier D., Danis M., Derouin F., Garcia-Domenech R. Identification of new antimalarial drugs by linear discriminant analysis and topological virtual screening. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006;57:489–497. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chapman H.D., Jeffers T.K., Williams R.B. Forty years of monensin for the control of coccidiosis in poultry. Poult. Sci. 2010;89:1788–1801. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kevin D.A., II, Meujo D.A.F., Hamann M.T. Polyether ionophores: Broad-spectrum and promising biologically active molecules for the control of drug-resistant bacteria and parasites. Exp. Opin. Drug Discov. 2009;4:109–146. doi: 10.1517/17460440802661443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gupta P.B., Onder T.T., Jiang G., Tao K., Kuperwasser C., Weinberg R.A., Lander E.S. Identification of selective inhibitors of cancer stem cells by high-throughput screening. Cell. 2009;138:645–659. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fuchs D., Daniel V., Sadeghi M., Opelz G., Naujokat C. Salinomycin overcomes ABC transporter-mediated multidrug and apoptosis resistance in human leukemia stem cell-like KG-1a cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;394:1098–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.03.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lu D., Choi M.Y., Yu J., Castro J.E., Kipps T.J., Carson D.A. Salinomycin inhibits Wnt signaling and selectively induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:13253–13257. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110431108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dong T.T., Zhou H.M., Wang L.L., Feng B., Lv B., Zheng M.H. Salinomycin selectively targets ‘CD133+’ cell subpopulations and decreases malignant traits in colorectal cancer lines. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2011;18:1797–1804. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1561-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arafat K., Iratni R., Takahashi T., Parek K., Al. Dhaheri Y., Adrian T.E., Attoub S. Inhibitory effects of salinomycin on cell survival, colony growth, migration, and invasion of human non-small cell lung cancer A549 and LNM35: Involvement of NAG-1. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim K.Y., Yu S.N., Lee S.Y., Chun S.S., Choi Y.L., Park Y.M., Song C.S., Chatterjee B., Ahn S.C. Salinomycin-induced apoptosis of human prostate cancer cells due to accumulated reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011;413:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu D., Zhang Y., Huang J., Fan Z., Shi F., Wang S. Salinomycin inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell in vitro and suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;443:712–717. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kusunoki S., Kato K., Tabu K., Inagaki T., Okabe H., Kaneda H., Suga S., Terao Y., Taga T., Takeda S. The inhibitory effect of salinomycin on the proliferation, migration and invasion of human endometrial cancer stem-like cells. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;129:598–605. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim W.K., Kim J.H., Yoon K., Kim S., Ro J., Kang H.S., Yoon S. Salinomycin, a p-glycoprotein inhibitor, sensitizes radiation-treated cancer cells by increasing DNA damage and inducing G2 arrest. Investig. New Drugs. 2012;30:1311–1318. doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9685-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim J.H., Chae M.J., Kim W.K., Kim Y.J., Kang H.S., Kim H.S., Yoon S. Salinomycin sensitizes cancer cells to the effects of doxorubicin and etoposide treatment by increasing DNA damage and reducing p21 protein. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011;162:773–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01089.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim J.H., Yoo H.I., Kang H.S., Ro J., Yoon S. Salinomycin sensitizes antimitotic drugs-treated cancer cells by increasing apoptosis via the prevention of G2 arrest. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012;418:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.12.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang G.N., Liang Y., Zhou L.J., Chen S.P., Chen G., Zhang T.P., Kang T., Zhao Y.P. Combination of salinomycin and gemcitabine eliminates pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2011;313:137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Naujokat C., Steinhart R. Salinomycin as a drug for targeting human cancer stem cells. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/950658. Article ID: 950658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huczyński A. Polyether ionophores—Promising bioactive molecules for cancer therapy. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;22:7002–7010. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.09.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huczyński A., Janczak J., Łowicki D., Brzezinski B. Monensin A acid complexes as a model of electrogenic transport of sodium cation. BBA-Biomembranes. 2012;1818:2108–2119. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huczyński A., Janczak J., Antoszczak M., Stefańska J., Brzezinski B. X-ray, FT-IR, NMR and PM5 structural studies and antibacterial activity of unexpectedly stable salinomycin-benzotriazole intermediate ester. J. Mol. Struct. 2012;1022:197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.05.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huczyński A., Janczak J., Stefańska J., Antoszczak M., Brzezinski B. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of amide derivatives of polyether antibiotic—Salinomycin. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;22:4697–4702. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.05.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huczyński A., Janczak J., Antoszczak M., Wietrzyk J., Maj E., Brzezinski B. Antiproliferative activity of salinomycin and its derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;22:7146–7150. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.09.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Antoszczak M., Maj E., Stefańska J., Wietrzyk J., Janczak J., Brzezinski B., Huczyński A. Synthesis, antiproliferative and antibacterial activity of new amides of salinomycin. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014;24:1724–1729. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Antoszczak M., Popiel K., Stefańska J., Wietrzyk J., Maj E., Janczak J., Michalska G., Brzezinski B., Huczyński A. Synthesis, cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of new esters of polyether antibiotic—Salinomycin. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;76:435–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Borgström B., Huang X., Pošta M., Hegardt C., Oredsson S., Strand D. Synthetic modification of salinomycin: Selective O-acylation and biological evaluation. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:9944–9946. doi: 10.1039/c3cc45983g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pedersen D.S., Rosenbohm C. Dry column vacuum chromatography. Synthesis. 2001;16:2431–2434. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18722. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kinashi H., Otake N., Yonehara H., Sato S., Saito Y. The structure of salinomycin, a new member of the polyether antibiotics. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973;14:4955–4958. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)87382-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kinashi H., Otake N., Yonehara H., Sato S., Saito Y. Studies on the ionophorous antibiotics. I. The crystal and molecular structure of salinomycin p-iodophenacyl ester. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 1975;31:2411–2415. doi: 10.1107/S0567740875007716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hildebrandt J., Meingassner J.G., Mieth H. Mode of action of the anticoccidial agent septamycine. J. Vet. Med. B. 1978;25:186–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pressman B.C. Antibiotics and Their Complexes. Volume 1 Marcel Dekker Inc.; New York, NY, USA: 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guyot J., Jeminet G., Prudhomme M., Sancelme M., Meiniel R. Interaction of the calcium ionophore A.23187 (Calcimycin) with Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli. Lett. Appl. Microb. 1993;16:192–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1993.tb01394.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mulligan M.E., Murray-Leisure K.A., Ribner B.S., Standiford H.C., John J.F., Korvick J.A., Kauffman C.A., Yu V.L. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A consensus review of the microbiology, pathogenesis, and epidemiology with implications for prevention and management. Am. J. Med. 1993;94:313–328. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90063-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tuberculosis. [(accessed on 6 October 2014)]. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/
- 35.Gobis K., Foks H., Wiśniewska K., Dąbrowska-Szponar M., Augustynowicz-Kopeć E., Napiórkowska A., Sikorski A. Synthesis, structure, and antimicrobial activity of heterocyclic phenylsulfonyl- and 4-aminophenylsulfonyl-carboximidamides. Monatsh. Chem. 2012;143:1161–1169. doi: 10.1007/s00706-012-0769-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123:309–314. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED Program. Oxford Diffraction Poland; Wrocław, Poland: 2006. Ver. 171.32.6. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sheldrick G.M. SHELXS97, SHELXL97, Program Package for Crystal Structure Solution and Refinement. University of Göttingen; Göttingen, Germany: 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brandenburg K., Putz K. Diamond. Crystal Impact GbR; Bonn, Germany: 2008. Ver. 3.1. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, Approved Standard M2-A-9. CLSI; Wayne, PA, USA: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Method for Antifungal Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Proposed Guideline, CLSI document M44-P. CLSI; Wayne, PA, USA: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard M7-A-7. CLSI; Wayne, PA, USA: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Youmans G.P. Test tube evaluation of tuberculostatic agents. Am. Rev. Tuberc. 1947;56:376. doi: 10.1164/art.1947.56.5.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Youmans G.P., Youmans A.S. A method for the determination of the rate of growth of tubercle bacilli by the use of small inocula. J. Bacteriol. 1949;58:247–255. doi: 10.1128/jb.58.2.247-255.1949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Atlas R.M., Snyder J.W. Handbook of Media for Clinical Microbiology. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 1995. pp. 313–326. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Foks H., Buraczewska M., Manowska W., Sawlewicz J. Investigation on pyrazine derivatives. Part 1. Synthesis and tuberculostatic action of pyrazinamidrazone 6-chloropyrazinamidrazone and their condensation products with aldehydes and ketones. Diss. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1971;23:49–58. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1971.tb08768.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.