Abstract
The chemical composition of fulvic acid (FA) with a molecular weight below 500 (FA-500) was analyzed, and its activity on promoting the seed germination of wheat was studied in this paper. The FA-500 was obtained by membrane separation technology and qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry combined with the retention index. Forty-seven constituents were identified, including structures with ester, acid and alcohol groups, which accounted for 95% of the total composition. The highest relative content of compounds was diethyl succinate and diethyl malonate, accounting for 29% and 17% of the total, respectively. Yannong 19 and Luyuan 301 wheat seeds were steeped with the FA-500 solution of different concentration respectively for two hours. Several markers were assessed: germination rate, coleoptile and radicle length, germination index, vitality index and the activity of α-amylase and (α+β) amylase. The results indicated that FA-500 had a significant effect on promoting seed germination within an appropriate concentration range. The best concentration was 0.5‰, and an inhibiting effect would appear with the increase of concentration. In the process of seed germination, FA-500 may affect the growth of the seed through influencing the amylase activity, which was related to respiration.
Keywords: chemical component, fulvic acid, GC-MS, membrane-graded, seed germination
1. Introduction
Humic acid (HA) is a kind of amorphous macromolecular organic substance, which is mainly formed by a series of biological and geochemical process from plant remains [1]. HA exists widely in soil and waters and has higher content in weathered coal, peat and young lignite [2,3]. HA includes black humic acid, hymatomelanic acid and fulvic acid (FA) in accordance with the molecular weight and the differences of solubility in different solvents [3,4]. Compared with black humic acid and hymatomelanic acid, FA has a lower molecular weight, higher solubility, stronger biological activity, more active functional groups and is more easily absorbed by organisms [5]. Many research works show that FA has many plant physiological activities, such as promoting resistance to salt and drought and regulating plant growth [6,7,8]. Furthermore, FA possesses various pharmacological properties, such as anti-viral, anti-ulcer, inhibiting Alzheimer’s disease, adjusting immunity and sobering-up activities [9,10,11,12].
The physiological and chemical properties of HA or FA are often closely related to their molecular weight. HA of Iowa Soils was studied by Mao et al. [13] using infrared spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry, and the results indicated that some characteristics of HA were related to the molecular size. HA molecules were divided into different molecular masses of eight grades by Li et al. [14,15] using ultrafiltration, and every grade was determined by high-performance size-exclusion chromatography, elemental analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance, of which the results showed that there were obvious differences on the structural characteristics and chemical properties among the eight grades of HA. In previous studies, we also found that a kind of FA substance with small molecules had a strong activity on promoting wheat seed germination at a very low concentration and meanwhile could alleviate salt injury in the wheat germination stage [16]. One of the reasons might be that small molecules were more easily absorbed by plants. Generally, the lower the molecular weight of FA, the greater the activity [17,18]. HA usually showed complexity of composition and a difference of function due to the multiplicity of raw material and different extraction processes, which created barriers for the research of the activity and its mechanism [19,20]. The molecular weight and chemical composition identification of humic substances, especially fulvic acids, is both the basis of and presents urgent needs for their activity studies.
Accordingly, we gave priority to the research of the chemical composition of the low molecular weight fulvic acids. Considering that FA has a broad molecular weight distribution and complex structure, special analytical methods are required for characterization. In this study, the FA sample with a molecular weight less than 500 daltons (FA-500), obtained from membrane separation technology, was analyzed by using the method of GC-MS combined with the retention index (RI). Meanwhile, the activity on promoting seed germination of the small molecular fraction of fulvic acids was further explored. The small molecule fraction of fulvic acids usually has strong activities at extremely low concentrations, which is very suitable for the development of high efficiency organic fertilizer, such as foliar fertilizer, drip irrigation fertilizer and plant growth regulators. This implies potential large economic value. The component identification and activity investigation of FA-500 in this study may provide a theoretical basis and technical support for the development of the high-end HA fertilizer.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Chemical Composition Analysis of FA-500
A small amount of FA-500 solid was dissolved in ethanol (100 μg/mL); the total ion current chromatogram of FA-500 was obtained through the conditions mentioned below, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The total ion current chromatogram of fulvic acid with a molecular weight below 500 (FA-500).
GC-MS was employed to separate and identify the chemical composition of FA-500 by combining with the RI values, and the relative content of the components was obtained through the method of peak area normalization. Forty-seven constituents from FA-500 with great similarity were acquired under the condition of the matching degrees of positive and negative. The name, retention time and the similarity of the components are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Chemical constituents of the FA-500 analyzed by GC-MS. RI, retention index.
| NO. | Compound | Retention Time (min) | Molecular Formula | Similarity (%) | RI | Area Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,5-Hexadiene-3-ol | 9.633 | C6H10O | 85.9 | 1032 | 1.425 |
| 2 | Ethyl glycolate | 10.545 | C4H8O3 | 98.7 | 1055 | 3.927 |
| 3 | Acetic acid | 11.694 | C2H4O2 | 93.9 | 1084 | 0.104 |
| 4 | Methoxyacetic acid | 11.739 | C3H6O3 | 92.6 | 1085 | 0.121 |
| 5 | Ethyl methyl ether | 11.796 | C3H8O | 95.6 | 1087 | 0.487 |
| 6 | Propan-1-ol | 11.825 | C3H8O | 96.8 | 1088 | 0.157 |
| 7 | Propanedioic acid, oxo-, ethyl methyl ester | 11.870 | C6H8O5 | 96.0 | 1091 | 0.224 |
| 8 | Diethyl oxalate | 14.388 | C6H10O4 | 98.3 | 1144 | 6.745 |
| 9 | Propanedioic acid, methyl, ethyl ester | 16.509 | C6H10O4 | 92.6 | 1190 | 0.394 |
| 10 | Diethyl malonate | 18.655 | C7H12O4 | 96.3 | 1233 | 17.156 |
| 11 | Glucose | 18.784 | C6H12O6 | 74.8 | 1236 | 0.323 |
| 12 | Ethyl levulinate | 19.520 | C7H12O3 | 91.8 | 1251 | 2.117 |
| 13 | Butanedioic acid, ethyl methyl ester | 20.897 | C7H12O4 | 94.9 | 1278 | 0.532 |
| 14 | Diethyl methylsuccinate | 21.188 | C9H16O4 | 93.7 | 1284 | 0.666 |
| 15 | Diethyl succinate | 23.452 | C8H14O4 | 92.7 | 1334 | 29.512 |
| 16 | Ethyl 4-acetylbutyrate | 25.256 | C8H14O3 | 97.1 | 1376 | 0.119 |
| 17 | Diethyl glutarate | 28.145 | C9H16O4 | 82.5 | 1522 | 2.235 |
| 18 | Hexanedioic acid diethyl ester | 33.825 | C10H18O4 | 82.2 | 1732 | 0.202 |
| 19 | Ethyl 3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoate | 36.317 | C8H16O3 | 91.8 | 1784 | 0.133 |
| 20 | 3-(methylthio)-propionaldehyde | 37.628 | C4H8OS | 77.9 | 1811 | 0.487 |
| 21 | Maleic acid diethyl ester | 40.808 | C8H14O5 | 98.0 | 1879 | 2.658 |
| 22 | Succinic acid, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-, diethyl ester | 46.054 | C9H16O5 | 86.3 | 1993 | 0.829 |
| 23 | Diethyl 3-hydroxyglutarate | 46.762 | C9H16O5 | 91.7 | 2009 | 0.159 |
| 24 | Diethyl 2-acetylglutarate | 49.274 | C11H18O5 | 83.6 | 2067 | 0.331 |
| 25 | Ethyl 2-ethylacetoacetate | 49.781 | C8H14O3 | 83.0 | 2078 | 0.170 |
| 26 | Ethyl oxamate | 49.987 | C4H7NO3 | 87.5 | 2083 | 0.231 |
| 27 | 2-(1-Ethoxyethoxy)-3-methysuccinic acid, diethyl ester | 51.244 | C13H24O6 | 87.8 | 2112 | 0.397 |
| 28 | 6-desoxy-l-gulitol | 51.303 | C6H14O5 | 80.1 | 2115 | 1.282 |
| 29 | d-glucosiduronic acid | 52.522 | C6H10O7 | 80.1 | 2143 | 0.226 |
| 30 | Levulinic acid | 52.995 | C5H8O3 | 86.4 | 2154 | 0.470 |
| 31 | d-manno-2-Heptulose | 53.376 | C7H14O7 | 81.4 | 2163 | 0.249 |
| 32 | Ethyl hydrogen malonate | 54.294 | C5H8O4 | 98.1 | 2185 | 5.070 |
| 33 | Tetraethylene glycol di-2-ethylhexoate | 54.528 | C24H46O7 | 83.0 | 2190 | 0.156 |
| 34 | Ethyl(2-tetrahydropyranyl)acetate | 54.702 | C9H16O3 | 78.7 | 2195 | 0.230 |
| 35 | Ethyl hydrogen succinate | 55.784 | C6H10O4 | 96.0 | 2221 | 11.388 |
| 36 | Diethyl 4-oxopimelate | 56.370 | C11H18O5 | 81.5 | 2236 | 0.846 |
| 37 | Succinic acid imide | 58.522 | C4H5NO2 | 84.2 | 2288 | 0.412 |
| 38 | 4-Dihexylcarbamoyl-butyric acid | 58.819 | C17H33NO3 | 81.4 | 2296 | 0.581 |
| 39 | Hexanedioic acid, 3-oxo-, diethyl ester | 60.846 | C10H16O5 | 86.4 | 2347 | 0.518 |
| 40 | Monoethyl itaconate | 61.055 | C7H10O4 | 87.7 | 2353 | 0.272 |
| 41 | Diethyl 2-aminomalonate | 62.080 | C7H13NO4 | 84.7 | 2379 | 0.277 |
| 42 | dl-glutamine | 64.203 | C5H10N2O3 | 81.4 | 2430 | 0.233 |
| 43 | 2-Ethyl-3-formylaminosuccinic acid, di-t-butyl ester | 65.068 | C15H27NO5 | 83.7 | 2449 | 0.235 |
| 44 | Isobutyl 3-(perhydro-5-oxo-2-furyl)propionate | 65.568 | C11H18O4 | 78.5 | 2461 | 0.216 |
| 45 | Diethyl allylmalonate | 68.679 | C10H16O4 | 81.8 | 2523 | 0.146 |
| 46 | Cis-9,10-Epoxyoctadecanamide | 74.336 | C18H35N2O2 | 82.2 | 2615 | 0.128 |
| 47 | Dodecanoic acid, 2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl ester | 74.975 | C16H32O4 | 81.9 | 2623 | 0.174 |
Table 1 showed that the relative content of all 47 constituents was more than 0.1%. These compounds accounted for 95% of the total composition. The highest mass fractions of the compounds were diethyl succinate and diethyl malonate, accounting for 29% and 17% of the total, respectively. The rest of the components with a higher content were ethyl hydrogen succinate, diethyl oxalate, ethyl hydrogen malonate and ethyl glycolate. The main ingredients were ethyl esters, which came up to 89%, and the rest was a small amount of acids and alcohols. Among them, the ethyl oxamate, DL-glutamine and diethyl 2-aminomalonate accounted for 0.231%, 0.233% and 0.277% respectively. These components are an indispensable nitrogen source for the plant [21,22]. The studies from Kelly et al. and Li et al. [23,24] showed that glutamine can promote the release of insulin from pancreatic cells and the generation of glutaminase plants to improve the activity of animals and plants.
To prove the validity of the results, the obtainable identified constituents had been mixed according to the relative content and dissolved with ethanol. Based on the conditions mentioned below, we obtained the spectra of 500-FA and the mixed standard sample, and the results are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The gas chromatogram of 500-FA and the mixed standard sample. Note: the top is the gas chromatogram of 500–FA; the bottom is the gas chromatogram of the mixed standard sample.
Figure 2 indicates that the material identified by the database had a great match with the standard mixture. The identified compounds of high content mostly had a good match with the mixed standard sample, but part of the material still was able to be matched. This implied that the result of the identification was erroneous or that there was the presence of isomers.
In this experiment, ethanol was chosen as the solvent. Other common solvents, such as acetone, acetonitrile, n-hexane, cyclohexane and ethyl acetate, cannot easily dissolve the sample and mixture. The pH of the 1% FA-500 solution was 2.1, while the main components identified were ethyl esters. It was supposed that there was a reaction between the acids and the solvent. This suggested that the choice of non-interfering solvent may be an important research direction of GC-MS analysis for FA.
2.2. Influence of FA-500 on Germination Rate, Coleoptile and Radicle Length of Wheat Seed
Table 2 revealed that FA-500 had an influence on the germination rate and length of coleoptile and radicle under the tested concentration. When the concentration gradient of FA-500 was 0.3‰, 0.5‰ and 0.7‰, the values of the germination rate and the length of coleoptile and radicle were higher than the control group for both kinds of seeds. At the concentration of 0.5‰, the activity of FA-500 was the most obvious, which produced a significant effect on the length of Luyuan 301 coleoptile and radicle and the length of Yannong 19 radicle (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the germination rate, the length of coleoptile and radicle for Yannong 19 increased by 1.6%, 9.5% and 16.1%, respectively. The three indexes of Luyuan 301 increased by 1.4%, 7.2% and 16.9%, respectively. However, the activity data of Yannong 19 and Luyuan 301 are similar. When the concentration was higher than 0.5‰, the three indexes of both kinds of seed began to be inhibited to varying degrees.
Table 2.
The effects of FA-500 with different concentrations on wheat seed germination.
| Treatment | Germination Rate/(%) | Length of Coleoptile/mm | Length of Radicle/mm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannong 19 | Luyuan 301 | Yannong 19 | Luyuan 301 | Yannong 19 | Luyuan 301 | |
| Control | 91.5 ± 0.3 | 78.0 ± 1.2 | 29.3 ± 0.3 | 28.9 ± 0.4 | 36.4 ± 0.2 | 34.1 ± 0.3 |
| 0.3‰ | 92.0 ± 0.4 | 76.0 ± 0.6 * | 29.7 ± 0.1 | 30.0 ± 0.2 | 35.1 ± 2.0 | 35.0 ± 0.4 |
| 0.5‰ | 92.5 ± 0.8 | 83.0 ± 2.5 | 32.0 ± 0.4 | 30.7 ± 0.7 * | 41.9 ± 0.6 * | 39.5 ± 0.7 * |
| 0.7‰ | 82.5 ± 2.9 * | 78.8 ± 0.8 | 30.2 ± 0.8 | 29.2 ± 0.6 | 40.6 ± 1.4 | 38.3 ± 0.4 * |
| 0.9‰ | 83.0 ± 1.2 * | 77.5 ± 1.5 | 36.1 ± 1.2 * | 27.6 ± 0.4 | 36.1 ± 0.4 | 35.4 ± 0.5 |
Results are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (* p < 0.05 vs. the control).
2.3. Influence of FA-500 on the Germination Index and the Vitality Index of Wheat Seed
Compared with the blank control group, the germination index and vitality index of both kinds of seed were improved significantly (p < 0.05) under most concentrations of FA-500 (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Overall, the two indexes of Yannong 19 were higher than Luyuan 301, which reflected that FA-500 had more significant activity on promoting germination for Yannong 19. At the concentration of 0.5‰, both indexes were the best. The two indexes of Yannong 19 increased by 29.7% and 49.1%, respectively, and 14.8% and 32.9% separately for Luyuan 301. When the concentration was higher than 0.5‰, there was a downward trend with the increase of concentration. When the concentration reached 0.9‰, the gap between the two kinds of seed was the largest for both indexes.
Figure 3.
The effects of FA-500 with different concentrations on the germination index of wheat seed. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (* p < 0.05 vs. control).
Figure 4.
The effects of FA-500 with different concentrations on the vitality index of wheat seed. Data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (* p < 0.05 vs. control).
2.4. Influence of FA-500 on the Activity of α-Amylase and (α+β) Amylase
Figure 5 and Figure 6 illustrated that the effect of FA-500 with different concentration on the activity of α-amylase and (α+β) amylase was remarkable. In the groups of 0.3‰, 0.5‰ and 0.7‰, the activity of the two amylases was higher than the control group. When the concentration of FA-500 came up to 0.5‰, both had the most significant effect (p < 0.05). At the top, the activities of α-amylase and (α+β) amylase for Yannong 19 increased by 76.6% and 43.3% respectively, and 80.0% and 53.2% respectively for Luyuan 19. When the concentration was higher than 0.5‰, the two indexes both showed a downward trend with the increase of concentration. At the concentration of 0.9‰, the indexes began to be less than the control groups. In general, with an increase in FA-500 concentration, the increasing or decreasing amplitude of α-amylase activity was larger than (α+β) amylase for both kinds of seed. In the process of seed germination, the amylase can hydrolyze starch to monose. The improvement of amylase activity is beneficial to increase the concentration of the monose needed by respiration, which is helpful to enhance the respiration of seeds. The results revealed that FA-500 may affect the amylase activity in the process of seed germination in order to influence the growth of the seed.
Figure 5.
The effects of FA-500 with different concentrations on the activity of α-amylase.
Figure 6.
The effects of FA-500 with different concentrations on the activity of (α+β) amylase.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Materials
Lignite was collected from Xiaopengzu coal mine in Eshan county of Yunnan province; then, its physical and chemical properties were analyzed, and the results are shown in Table 3. The selected wheat cultivars are Yannong 19 and Luyuan 301, which were examined and approved by Crop Variety Approval Committee of Shandong Province, PR China (Approval Nos. 2001001 and 2007044). The identification of the genotype refers to these papers [25,26,27]. Hoagland’s nutrient solution was prepared according to Hoagland et al. [28]. C8-C40 n-alkane mixed standard was bought from AccuStandard company of the U.S. Thirty percent hydrogen peroxide was purchased from East Tengen Reagent Factory of Tianjin. The MD31 dialysis bag was bought from Spectrum labs of the U.S. The Agilent GC/MS 6890N/5975C was bought from Agilent of the U.S. The R100 rotary evaporator was bought from Shanghai Shen Shun Biotechnology Co. Ltd. The freeze dryer was from Shanghai lang Instrument Co., Ltd. The centrifugal machine was from the Shanghai anting instrument plant.
Table 3.
The main physicochemical properties of the raw coal. HA, humic acid; FA, fulvic acid.
| Sample | The Water Content (%) | The Ash Content (%) | The Total HA Content (%) | The Free HA Content (%) | The FA Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eshan brown coal | 18.30 | 13.16 | 51.29 | 53.25 | 1.07 |
3.2. Preparation of 500-FA
One liter of 30% (v/v) H2O2 was added in the reactor with 1 kg sieved brown coal, continuously stirred for 3 h at 40 °C. When the oxidation reaction was finished, the product was centrifuged for 15 min (speed 3500 r/min), and the filtered supernatant fluid was the degradation liquid. The degradation liquid was concentrated and dried by a vacuum-rotary evaporation procedure at 50 °C. Solid FA was dialyzed with a 100–500 DA bag, and then, the dialysis fluid was concentrated and freeze-dried into a solid. The 0.3‰, 0.5‰ and 0.7‰ FA-500 solutions were prepared with distilled water by mass:volume (g/L).
3.3. Chromatographic Conditions
Column: HP-FFAP fused silica capillary column (30.0 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm); carrier gas: He; flow rate: 2.0 mL/min; constant current mode; injector temperature: 180 °C; split injection, split ratio of 10:1; the initial temperature was maintained at 60 °C for 7 min, programmed to 180 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min and held for 10 min; transmission line temperature: 280 °C.
3.3.1. MS Conditions
Using an electron bombardment iron source under the condition of electronic energy of 70 eV; electron multiplier voltage: 980 V; solvent delay time: 7 min; the temperature of ionization source and quadrupole were set as: 250 °C, 150 °C; scanning mode: full scan, mass range of m/z 50–550 atomic mass units; and the scan rate was 0.5 scan/s.
3.3.2. Measurement of RI
According to the conditions mentioned above, each n-alkane standard peak retention time value was measured with a linear heating program of the retention index formula to calculate the components of the RI values:
| RI = 100Z + 100 [TR (X) − TR (Z)]/[TR (Z + 1) − TR (Z)] | (1) |
wherein: TR (X), TR (Z), TR (Z + 1) are the peak retention time value of the sample and n-alkanes standards substance whose carbon atoms were Z and Z + 1, respectively; moreover, TR (Z) < TR (X) < TR (Z + 1). The RI of the analyzed components was obtained through calculating the retention time of the components obtained by GC, to verify the structure of the component further [29,30]. The retention time of FA-500 and mixed standards (C8-C40 n-alkanes) is shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Gas chromatogram of FA-500 and C8-C40 n-alkanes. The top is the gas chromatogram of FA-500; the bottom is the gas chromatogram of C8-C40 n-alkanes.
3.4. Seed Germination Process
The plump seeds were disinfected with 10% NaClO for 10 min and then washed 7 times with sterile distilled water. Using distilled water as the blank control and FA-500 solution with different concentrations as the sensitized liquid, the seeds were soaked in these respectively for two hours. One-hundred fifty grains of sensitized seeds from the same batch were put into three petri dishes with 50 grains per petri dish. The bottom of the petri dishes with a diameter of 12 cm was covered by a layer of filter paper, and 10 mL Hoagland’s nutrient solution were added into each petri dish. The seeds were cultured in a constant temperature incubator as 16–26 °C during the day and 10–16 °C at night, and the average photoperiod was 14 h. The evaporative loss of water was obtained through the weight method and compensated by adding distilled water into petri dishes. After 72 h, the germination rate, coleoptile and radicle length, germination index, vitality index and activity of α-amylase and (α+β) amylase were measured respectively according to the methods of Section 3.5.
3.5. Measurement of Activity Index
This was the standard of seed germination that the length of the seed radicle was more than the seed length by 1/2. After 72 h, the coleoptile and radicle length of 20 germinating seeds from each group were measured randomly, and the germination rate, germination index and vitality index were calculated according to the following formulas.
| Germination rate (GR) = ∑Gt/T × 100% | (2) |
| Germination index (GI) = ∑Gt/Dt | (3) |
| Vitality index (VI) = S × GI (4) | (4) |
Gt is the number of germinations on the t-th day; Dt is the germination number accordingly; T is the total number of seeds; S is the length of radicle. After 72 h, the activity of the seeds of α-amylase and (α+β) amylase was measured using 3, 5-2 nitro salicylic acid [31].
4. Conclusions
The chemical constituents of FA-500 and their molecular weight were analyzed and identified by using GC-MS combined with RI in this study. Moreover, the activity of FA-500 on promoting wheat seed germination was explored preliminarily. It could be concluded that FA-500 can produce a significant effect on promoting wheat seed germination in the appropriate concentration range, while it showed an inhibiting effect with a high concentration. In the process of seed germination, FA-500 may affect the growth of the seed through influencing the amylase activity, which was related to respiration. The results are consistent with the research of Zhang Hui et al. [18,32], and their study found that small molecules of FA showed a greater promoting activity.
In addition, fulvic acid was also found to overcome the rate-limiting step of transport of Fe from soil solution to plant roots by diffusion, and the efficiency of Fe-FA as a fertilizer is much greater than that of FeCl3 [8]. This may be related to the complexation of metal ions and oxygen-containing functional groups (such as carboxyl, phenolic hydroxyl, alcoholic hydroxyl and quinonyl group) belonging to FA [33]. Humic substances can enhance the availability of Zn and Fe, which were able to improve the activity of many enzymes [34]. The FA-500 with lower molecular weight has higher relative content of oxygen-containing functional groups, which probably produces more advantages for the diffusion and ion regulation in the plant. In addition, the activity characteristics of FA-500 were very similar to plant hormones with a promotive effect in this study. Many other studies also indicated that humic acids, particularly small molecule fractions, often show a hormone-like effect. Piccolo et al. found that humic acids had auxin-like, gibberellin-like and cytokinin-like activity, and the small molecule fractions could produce higher activity [17]. In the research of Nardi et al., the humic substances exhibited auxin-like and gibberellin-like activity [35]. Indoleacetic acid was directly detected in the humus by Muscolo et al. [36]. Meanwhile, the terpenes, phenols and quinones in humic acids or fulvic acids also have been confirmed to have indirect activities on promoting growth or resisting adversity [18,37,38]. Although plant hormone was not directly detected in the FA-500, it was not ruled out that some of these small molecules were the precursors or intermediates to form plant hormones or their analogues. Furthermore, the activity mechanism of F-500 may be similar to plant hormones and their analogues.
The study confirmed again that small molecule fraction of fulvic acids had strong activities at very low concentrations. FA-500, as a mixture consisting of small molecule organic compounds with a high activity, is very suitable for the development of high efficiency organic fertilizer or additives such as foliar fertilizer, drip irrigation fertilizer and plant growth regulators. This implies potential large economic value. The component identification and activity investigation of FA-500 in this study may provide a theoretical basis and technical support for the development of the high-end HA fertilizer. The focuses of future research on FA will be the activity of a single component, the interaction among different components and the molecular mechanism of activity.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21466018) and the Discipline Orientation Team Project of Kunming University of Science and Technology, China (No. 14078372).
Author Contributions
Hui Zhu, Yi Qin and Baocai Li conceived of and designed the experiments. Hui Zhu, Mi Zhang and Cheng Xiang performed the experiments. Hui Zhu, Huifen Zhang analyzed the data. Hui Zhu, Baocai Li and Yi Qin contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. Hui Zhu and Yi Qin wrote the paper. All of the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Sample Availability: Not available.
References
- 1.Abbt B.G., Lankes U., Frimmel F.H. Structural Characterization of Aquatic Humic Substances? The Need for a Multiple Method Approach. Aquat. Sci. 2004;66:151–170. doi: 10.1007/s00027-004-0711-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cavani L., Ciavatta C., Trubetskaya O.E., Reznikova O.I., Afanaseva G.V., Trubetskoj O.A. Capillary zone electrophoresis of soil humic acid fractions obtained by coupling size-exclusion chromatography and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A. 2003;983:263–270. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01737-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cheng S.X. Introduction of Humic Substances. 1st ed. CIP; Beijing, China: 2007. Exordium; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stevenson F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. 2nd ed. John Wiley Sons; New York, NY, USA: 1994. Structural basis of humic substances; p. 337. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lian H.D., Quan Y., Hong L.Y. Changes of chemical properties of humic acids from crude and fungal transformed lignite. Fuel. 2006;85:2402–2407. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maosz A. Effect of fulvic and humic organic acids and calcium on growth and chlorophyll content of tree species grown under salt stress. Dendrobiology. 2009;62:47–53. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhou L.N., Sun L.R., Mao H., Dong Q.U. Effects of drought-resistant fulvic acid liquid fertilizer on wheat and maize growth. Agric. Res. Arid Areas. 2012;30:154–158. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pandeya S.B., Singh A.K., Dhar P. Fluence of fulvic acid on transport of iron in soils and uptake by paddy seedlings. Plant Soil. 1998;198:117–125. doi: 10.1023/A:1004256325090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schepetkin I., Khlebnikov A., Kwon B.S. Medical dfugs from humus matter: focus on mumie. Drug Dev. Res. 2002;57:140–159. doi: 10.1002/ddr.10058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li Y.M., Li B.C., Li P., Liu J.Z., Cui J.L., Mei Z.Q. Effects of Na-FA on gastrointestinal movement and gastric ulcer in mice. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2011;34:1565–1569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cornejo A., Jiménez J.M., Caballero L., Melo F., Maccioni R.B. Fulvic acid inhibits aggregation and promotes disassembly of tau fibrils associated with Alzheimer’s. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2011;27:143–153. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bi Y.Y., Li B.C., He J., Li Y.M., Cui J.L., Zhang S.H., Mei Z.Q. Study on Extraction and Sober-up Effect of Fulvic Acid (FA) Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2010;22:144–148. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mao J.D., Fang X.W., Klaus S.R., Ana M.C., Lakhwinder S.H., Michael L.T. Molecular-scale heterogeneity of humic acid in particle-size fractions of two Iowa soils. Geoderma. 2007;140:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.03.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li L., Zhao Z.Y., Huang W.L., Peng P.A., Sheng J.Y., Fu J.M. Characterization of humic acids fractionated by ultrafiltration. Org. Geochem. 2004;35:1025–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li L., Yu Z., Ran Y., Sheng G., Fu J.M., Peng P., Huang W. Characteristics for the molecular weight distribution of the Pahokee peat humic acids and the effects on the sorption of phenanthrene. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae. 2004;24:587–594. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ma L., Qin Y., Zhu H., Zhang H., He J., Li S., Li B.C. The Effect of Brown Coal Distillate on the Germination of Wheat. Life Sci. Res. 2014;18:423–430. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Piccolo A., Nardi S., Coxcheri G. Structural characteristics of humic substances as related to nitrate uptake and growth regulation in plant systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1992;24:373–380. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(92)90197-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang H., Jiang W.Y., Liu B. Study on the activity and mechanism of humic acid from different sources: I. The sample preparation and structure determination of humic acid and its effect on plant seed germination. Humic Acid. 2000;1:9–14. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang S.H., Li B.C., Zhang H.F., Liu J.Z., He J., Dai W.F., Li P. Physicochemical Properties of Humic Acid Separated from Chemolysis Brown Coal from Xundian Yunnan. J. Kunming Univ. Sci. Technol. 2010;35:98–102. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang J., He J., Zhang H., Zhuang W., Li B.C. Effects of lignite-derived sodium fulvate on angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Latin Am. J. Pharmacol. 2014;33:1252–1257. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen Y.L. Influence of humic acids on physiological activities of plants. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2000;17:11–16. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li C., Liu K.H., Lan J.K. Humic acid and it’s significant in protection of soil environment. J. Guangxi Acad. Sci. 2001;17:129–132. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kelly A., Li C., Gao Z., Stanley C.A., Matschinsky F.M. Glutam inolysis and insulin secretion: From bedside to bench and back. Diabetes. 2002;51:S421–S426. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.S421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li C., Buettger C., Kwagh J., Matter A., Daikhin Y., Nissim I.B., Collins H.W., Yudkoff M., Stanley C.A., Matschinsky F.M. A signaling role of glutamine in insulin secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:13393–13401. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311502200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gismondi A., Canini A. Microsatellite analysis of Latial Olea europaea L. Cultivars. Plant Biosyst. 2013;147:686–691. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2012.751066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gismondi A., Impei S., Di Marco G., Crespan M., Leonardi D., Canini A. Detection of new genetic profiles and allelic variants in improperly classified grapevine accessions. Genome. 2014;57:111–118. doi: 10.1139/gen-2013-0218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hayden M.J., Nguyen T.M., Waterman A., McMichael G.L., Chalmers K.J. Application of multiplex-ready PCR for fluorescence-based SSR genotyping in barley and wheat. Mol. Breed. 2008;21:271–281. doi: 10.1007/s11032-007-9127-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hoagland D.R., Arnon D.I. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stat. 1950;347:1–32. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang Y.H., Wong P.K. Correlation relationships between physic-chemical properties and gas chromatographic retention index of polychlorinated-dibenzofurans. Chemosphere. 2003;50:499–505. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00491-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hu R.J., Liu H.X., Zhang R.S., Chun X.X., Xiao J.Y., Man C.L., Zhi D.H., Bo T.F. QSPR prediction of GC retention indices for nitrogen-containing polycyclic aromatic compounds from heuristically computed molecular descriptors. Talanta. 2005;68:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhou B.Y. Modern Plant Physiology Laboratory Manual. 1st ed. Science Press; Beijing, China: 1999. Determination of amylase activity; pp. 123–124. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang H., Jiang W.Y., Liu B. Study on the activity and mechanism of humic acid from different sources: II. The effect of humic acid on enzyme activity, respiration and photosynthesis of plants. Humic Acid. 2000;2:16–19. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rashid M.A. Absorption of metals on sedimentary and peat humic acids. Chem. Geol. 1974;13:121–132. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(74)90003-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen Y., Nobili M.D., Aviad T. Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: Magdoff F., Weil R.R., editors. Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture. 1st ed. CRC; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2004. pp. 103–124. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Reniero F., Muscolo A. Biological activity of humic substances extracted from soils under different vegetation cover. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1999;30:621–634. doi: 10.1080/00103629909370232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Muscolo A., Cutrupi S., Nardi S. IAA detection in humic substances. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998;30:1199–1201. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00005-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mato M.C., Fábregas R., Méndez J. Inhibitory Effect of Soil Humic Acids on Indoleacetic Acid Oxidase. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1971;3:285–288. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(71)90037-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mato M.C., Olmedo M.G., Méndez J. Inhibition of enzymatic indoleacetic acid oxidation by soil fulvic acids. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1972;4:475–478. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(72)90063-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]







