Table 4.
Volatile Compounds 1 | Extraction Methods | Enantiomeric Excess(e.e, %) 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP | CO | TO | |||||
Confgn. 3 | e.e | Confgn. | e.e | Confgn. | e.e | ||
α-Pinene | SPME | + | 86.96 | + | 90.31 | + | 71.55 |
SD | + | 87.89 | + | 93.91 | + | 66.91 | |
SE | + | 87.79 | + | 94.25 | + | 67.78 | |
Sabinene | SPME | nd 4 | +/− | 100.00 | +/− | 18.26 | |
SD | nd | +/− | 100.00 | +/− | 41.51 | ||
SE | nd | +/− | 100.00 | +/− | 38.29 | ||
Limonene | SPME | + | 49.57 | + | 91.52 | + | 24.09 |
SD | + | 56.70 | + | 96.74 | + | 23.29 | |
SE | + | 58.54 | + | 97.48 | + | 29.89 | |
β-Phellandrene | SPME | − | 100.00 | − | 100.00 | − | 100.00 |
SD | − | 52.92 | + | 17.25 | − | 96.68 | |
SE | − | 41.44 | − | 100.00 | − | 98.01 | |
4-Terpineol | SPME | − | 100.00 | − | 66.05 | + | 57.09 |
SD | + | 12.08 | − | 100.00 | + | 4.27 | |
SE | + | 18.95 | nd | + | 6.65 | ||
Bornyl acetate | SPME | − | 100.00 | − | 87.59 | − | 100.00 |
SD | − | 100.00 | − | 75.16 | − | 55.63 | |
SE | − | 96.59 | − | 78.93 | − | 100.00 | |
γ-Muurolene | SPME | +/− | 47.84 | +/− | 100.00 | +/− | 72.85 |
SD | nd | +/− | 100.00 | +/− | 61.79 | ||
SE | +/− | 2.51 | +/− | 13.46 | +/− | 22.32 | |
Caryophyllene | SPME | − | 64.50 | − | 56.53 | − | 92.56 |
SD | − | 100.00 | + | 100.00 | − | 91.06 | |
SE | − | 45.95 | − | 19.85 | − | 93.47 | |
γ-Curcumene | SPME | +/− | 52.10 | nd | +/− | 51.40 | |
SD | +/− | 100.00 | nd | +/− | 100.00 | ||
SE | nd | nd | nd |
1 The enantiomeric isomers separated on Cyclodex-B column; 2 The enantiomer excess (e.e, %) = ((predominant enantiomer − minor enantiomer)/(predominant enantiomer + minor enantiomer)) × 100; 3 Confgn. = The optical configuration of predominant enantiomer as following criteria: +, (+)-isomers identified by authentic chiral standard or retention index; −, (−)-isomers identified by authentic chiral standard or retention index; +/−, were identified without distinction of chirality; 4 nd = not detected.