Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2015 Dec 24;21(1):23. doi: 10.3390/molecules21010023

Benz[c,d]indolium-containing Monomethine Cyanine Dyes: Synthesis and Photophysical Properties

Eduardo Soriano 1,†, Cory Holder 1,†, Andrew Levitz 1, Maged Henary 1,2,*
Editor: Pani Koutentis
PMCID: PMC6274575  PMID: 26712725

Abstract

Asymmetric monomethine cyanines have been extensively used as probes for nucleic acids among other biological systems. Herein we report the synthesis of seven monomethine cyanine dyes that have been successfully prepared with various heterocyclic moieties such as quinoline, benzoxazole, benzothiazole, dimethyl indole, and benz[e]indole adjoining benz[c,d]indol-1-ium, which was found to directly influence their optical and energy profiles. In this study the optical properties vs. structural changes were investigated using nuclear magnetic resonance and computational approaches. The twisted conformation unique to monomethine cyanines was exploited in DNA binding studies where the newly designed sensor displayed an increase in fluorescence when bound in the DNA grooves compared to the unbound form.

Keywords: cyanine dye, unsymmetrical, synthesis, optical properties, DFT calculations, DNA grooves

1. Introduction

Polymethine dyes represent a class of organic molecules with absorption bands that cover a broad spectral range (430–1100 nm), larger than any other class of dye system [1]. Cyanine dyes consist of two terminal aza-heterocycles connected via an electron deficient polymethine bridge that allows for a push/pull system between the two heterocycles. The delocalization of electrons across this bridge causes them to exhibit long wavelength absorptions. In addition to the variable length of the conjugated system between the heterocycles, the heterocycles themselves can be altered which allows chemists to create dyes that possess ideal photophysical properties, such as high molar extinction coefficients (>105 M−1·cm−1), tunable fluorescence intensities, and narrow absorption bands. Due to the diversity in function associated with this class of chromophore, an extensive number of cyanine dyes have been synthesized and developed for numerous applications in photographic processes and more recently as fluorescent probes for bio-molecular labeling and imaging [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].

As cyanine dyes have been shown to be highly modifiable for desirable properties such as solubility, permeability, and binding, these modifications can also cause changes in the dye’s photophysical properties. Recently, the interpretation of the fluorogenic behavior of the monomethine cyanine dyes from in silico studies has been successfully used to design new fluorescent molecular rotors as viscosity sensors [10]. Two asymmetric dyes shown in Figure 1, thiazole orange (TO) and oxazole yellow (YO), are well known imaging probes in the biological sciences due to their enhanced photophysical properties which have been attributed to restricted torsional motion of the dye in the excited state upon binding to target a macromolecule (i.e., nucleic acid structure, protein) [11,12,13,14]. TO absorbs and fluoresces at 501 nm and 525 nm, respectively, while YO absorbs and fluoresces at 491 nm and 509 nm, respectively [15]. The dimers of these compounds are also known imaging probes and shown in Figure 1. YOYO absorbs and fluoresces at 450 nm [16] and 510 nm, respectively, while TOTO absorbs and fluoresces at 513 and 530 nm, respectively [17,18]. Nonetheless, there is a lack of understanding of how the structure interplays with the optical performance (i.e., extinction coefficient and fluorescence)—especially for those monomethine cyanines with red-shifted wavelengths [9,19,20,21]. Thus, it is important to understand how varying substituents and heterocycles would affect the optical properties of each dye.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Commercially available asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes.

Imaging of macromolecules such as DNA by staining with fluorescent compounds is of great interest, therefore, expanding the options of available probes is vital to several areas of research spanning from medical diagnostics to genomics [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The synthesis of low cost, easy to manipulate systems for fast analysis is required [8]. Fluorescent detection has rapidly become one of the most widely used techniques due to its sensitivity and noninvasiveness [39]. Ethidium bromide has commonly been used for the detection of DNA, however it has mutagenic effects and poses other environmental concerns [40,41,42]. On the other hand, cyanine dyes are sensitive, safe and highly modifiable.

Recently, our group has synthesized a series of benz[c,d]indol-1-ium-containing monomethine cyanines with separate adjoining heterocyclic moieties which were found to directly influence the optical properties of the dye system [20]. In this report seven additional red-shifted monomethine cyanine dyes were synthesized and the structural influence on their fluorogenic properties was investigated by comparing the optical characteristics, examining the change in chemical shifts of methine proton and carbon NMR spectra, determining the energy profile through in silico approaches, as well as demonstrating that the dyes can be employed as DNA binding agents. The ability to use the theoretical calculations of optical properties for fluorophores, such as monomethine dyes could be useful for the development of the viscosity detection methods or bioimaging agents with desirable optical profiles.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

Toward gaining better understanding of the relationship between various heterocyclic substitutions and changes in optical properties we began to rationally design and investigate the effect of altering the heterocyclic substitution on the photophysical characteristics of the dye systems. Two sets of monomethine cyanines were explored without altering the benz[c,d]indole heterocycle half of the dye. The first set possessing different heterocycles including 2-methylbenzothiazole, 2-methylbenzoxazole, 3,3-dimethylbenz[e]indole or 2-methylquinoline, respectively, and the second set containing the same 3,3-dimethylindole heterocycle, but with different substituents, one electron donating and one electron withdrawing, on the 5 position of the heterocyclic ring system.

The asymmetric red-shifted monomethine cyanine dyes were synthesized as shown in Scheme 1. The synthesis began with the alkylation of benz[c,d]indol-2(1H)-one (1) by reflux with iodobutane in acetonitrile. The alkylated amide 2 was then converted to the thioketone 3 under reflux with phosphorous pentasulfide in pyridine. The thioketone 3 was methylated to a thioether with iodomethane creating the key precursor, quaternary ammonium salt 4, which was used as one heterocycle. The second heterocycle was synthesized beginning with a Fischer indole synthesis by refluxing 4-substituted phenylhydrazine hydrochlorides 7 and 3-methyl-2-butanone in glacial acetic acid. The synthesized heterocyclic derivatives 8, 2-methylbenzothiazole, 2-methylbenzoxazole, 2,3,3-trimethylbenz[e]indole, and 2-methylquinoline were alkylated, respectively, with various alkyl halides in acetonitrile to form quaternary ammonium salts 5a–d and 9a–c, which acted as the second heterocycle for the final dyes. The two heterocycles were then connected by a condensation reaction in acetonitrile with a catalytic amount of triethylamine to afford final dyes 6a–d and 10a–c.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

Synthesis of Monomethine Dyes.

The reaction begins with the deprotonation of the methyl group at the 2 position of the heterocycle. This activated methylene group of the various heterocyclic salts 5a–d and 9a–c displaces the methyl sulfide moiety of 4 and results in the formation of the asymmetrical monomethine dyes 6a–d and 10a–c. After isolation, the dyes were characterized by HRMS, 1H- and 13C-NMR and their photophysical properties were investigated.

2.2. Optical Properties

Optical properties are shown in Table 1. Absorption for each dye was recorded in methanol and 9/1 glycerol/methanol solution. Many monomethine cyanines display multiple bands which are attributed to different vibronic bands of the same electronic transition [16]. Because the compounds did not fluoresce in methanol due the ability to freely rotate around the methine bridge in free flowing solvent, emission was recorded in a more viscous solvent, 9/1 glycerol/methanol solution. Representative UV-Vis spectra are shown in Figure 2. A symmetrical monomethine dye containing two benzothiazole heterocycles has a λmax of 430 nm in ethanol [43]. It has been shown by Brooker et al., that if the nitrogen containing heterocycles are not identical, or if the relative stabilities of the two resonance forms are different, the absorption would not be at the midpoint [44]. The substitution of one of these heterocycles with benz[c,d]indole shifts the λmax over 100 nm to 555 nm as seen in 6b. This was accounted for by the further conjugated electron deficient system in the benz[c,d]indole heterocycle [1,20,45,46]. The conjugated system has more electronegativity due to the oxygen atom in 6a causing a blue shift of the λmax to 498 nm [11,47]. While the compounds containing 3,3-dimethylindole have similar absorption maxima to the benzothiazole compounds, the addition of an extra benzene ring as seen in 6d red shifts the λmax to 585 nm due to the increased conjugation through the heterocycle. All of the dyes displayed molar extinction coefficients in the range of 24,000–38,000 M−1·cm−1. The dye with a methoxy substituted indole heterocycle 10b showed the lowest molar absorptivity at 24,800 M−1·cm−1 due to the electron donating nature of the methoxy group introducing electron density back into the system [47,48]. Aggregation was ruled out by measuring absorption of 6b as a representative compound at various concentrations (5–25 μM) and the results were presented in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S2G). Solvatochromic studies were performed on dye 6b in five different solvents (ethanol, dimethyl formamide, dichloromethane, acetonitrile, and aqueous tris buffer) (Figure S2H). Less than 5 nm change in λmax was observed. Such a small shift suggests that the electronic distribution of the ground state dye is virtually unaffected by the solvent polarity [47].

Table 1.

Spectral Characteristics of Dyes 6a–d and 10ac.

Dye λabs (nm) a λabs (nm) b λemission (nm) b Stokes Shift (nm) b ε (M−1·cm−1) a
6a 498 505 570 65 37600
6b 555 563 609 46 32300
6c 585 587 609 22 36500
6d 553 557 625 68 25300
10a 537 552 657 105 33300
10b 563 569 606 37 24800
10c 552 571 662 91 30100
Open in a new tab

a methanol b methanol/glycerol 9/1 (v/v).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Absorbance (solid lines) and emission (dashed lines) in methanol/glycerol 9/1 spectra at 20 μM.

It has been reported that the fluorescence of these compounds cannot be observed in methanol alone because of a high nonradiative rate of return of the excited molecule as previously reported with many monomethine cyanines [20,49,50,51]. However, when a viscous solution is used, the free rotation around the methine bridge is restricted and a fluorescence signal is observed as shown in Figure 2. Methanol (10%) was used in order to solubilize the compounds in the highly viscous glycerol. Fluorescence maxima ranged from 570 nm to 662 nm, almost reaching the near-infrared region. The benzoxazole containing dye 6a had the highest fluorescence intensity followed by benzothiazole containing dye 6b. The quinoline containing dye 6c had the least fluorescence intensity due to alternative relaxation pathways [52]. The largest Stokes shift, greater than 100 nm, was observed for the dye with an indole based heterocycle, 10a. Since the emission intensity was so low the Stokes shift reported could be slightly skewed due to low signal to noise. However, this finding is in agreement with red-shifted compounds previously synthesized by our group [20]. Large Stokes shifts are ideal for imaging applications as the excitation light is farther from the fluorescence signal of the compound [39,53].

2.3. Computational Evaluations

The electronic spectra of the monomethine dyes were investigated to help elucidate the trends described above in the optical properties. As shown by the calculations in Figure 3, over the series of dyes when the geometry is planar both the HOMO and LUMO orbitals are spread evenly throughout the dye. When the dyes are twisted out of plane the HOMO orbitals are localized around the more conjugated system benz[c,d]indole heterocycle. The energy transitions in cyanine dyes have been shown to be a dominant π–π* transition [11,21], but if the dye assumes a twisted geometry the orbitals are not delocalized throughout the dye, as shown in Figure 3, and the system is not conjugated or planar [54].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Frontier molecular orbitals of 6a constrained in planar (left) and twisted (right) configurations.

The geometry was constrained to keep the molecule planar to observe trends in the HOMO–LUMO gaps for comparing with excitation energies. As shown in Figure 4, the energy gap between HOMO and LUMO of compound 6d containing a benz[e]indole heterocycle is the lowest among the series of dyes at 2.06 eV. This finding is corroborated by the bathochromic absorbance maximum of the benz[e]indole compared to the Fischer indole, benzothiazole, and benzoxazole heterocycles which led to further delocalizing of the electrons and therefore stabilizing the orbitals.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

HOMO and LUMO orbital analysis of differing heterocycles in the monomethine system; energies (black), HOMO-LUMO gaps (blue).

The benzoxazole heterocycle in dye 6a influenced the conjugated system shown by shifting the absorbance maximum to the blue. This dye 6a shows the highest energy gap likely due to both the lone pair of electrons and electronegativity of the oxygen atom similar to dye 6b with a sulfur containing benzothiazole heterocycle that had the second highest energy gap. Dye 10a containing a 3,3-dimethylindole heterocycle had the same energy gap as 6b with the benzothiazole heterocycle, but had higher energy.

The theoretical absorption λmax values are plotted along with the experimental data as shown in Figure 5. Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) has been shown to work well for large conjugated molecules because the orbitals are obtained by solving the Kohn-Sham equation involving exchange and correlation (XC) terms [55]. Although a discrepancy gap is observed between the theoretical and experimental results, the observed trends in absorbance wavelength are almost the same with the calculated absorbance wavelength giving slightly blue-shifted values [47].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Experimental and Calculated λmax values.

As shown in Figure 6 and Table 2, the observed change of the chemical shift of the methine-proton is most likely due to altering the electron density from the surrounding atoms.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

1H-NMR shift of meso-proton in DMSO-d6 at 25 °C, Calculated EMP on the right.

Table 2.

λmax, NMR shifts, and computational charges of monomethine cyanine dyes.

Heterocycle Included in Monomethine Dye λabs (nm) exp. λabs (nm) calc. Charge of Methine Carbon Methine Carbon Shift (ppm) Methine Proton Shift (ppm) N-CH3 1H Shift (ppm)
6a benzoxazole 498 490 −0.535 75.51 6.15 4.05
6b benzothiazole 555 500 −0.421 87.40 6.47 4.16
6c quinoline 585 520 −0.526 93.65 6.35 4.37
6d benz(e)indole 553 487 −0.284 94.10 6.43 3.60
10a 3,3-dimethylindole 542 519 −0.328 82.78 6.30 3.47
Substitution at the 5-position of heterocycle 10a
10a H 542 519 −0.328 82.78 6.31 -
10b OMe 563 550 −0.316 83.44 6.23 -
10c Cl 552 530 −0.344 83.81 6.29 -
Open in a new tab

Calculated values obtained via TD-DFT in vacuum, NMR run in DMSO-d6 at 25 °C.

2.4. DNA Binding

It has been reported that a combination of a crescent shape complements the helical DNA minor groove, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors on the side of the molecule facing the DNA, a cationic center to enhance electrostatic interactions with negatively charged phosphate groups, and hydrophobic character from an extended fused heterocyclic structure allows for optimization of the compound for DNA minor groove interactions [56,57,58,59]. Dye 6b, which is crescent shaped and has an overall hydrophobic structure, includes a sulfur on the side suggested by computational data to be facing the DNA (Figure 7) and contains delocalized positive charge throughout the polymethine chain; therefore, it was selected for DNA binding as a representative example of the series.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Dye 6b with fixed torsion angles and planar geometry suggested to bind to the major (left) and minor (right) grooves of dsDNA by computational studies.

As presented in Figure 8, the fluorescence spectrum of 6b in Tris-HCl buffer exhibits a particularly weak fluorescence spectrum with 2 local maxima at 565 nm and 630 nm. The 565 nm band is red shifted to 582 when ct-DNA is added and an increase in fluorescence is observed. Similar to the previously described enhancement in glycerol, a viscous solvent, this enhancement is also attributable to the fact that on excitation the inability to freely rotate around the methine bond due to binding does not allow for nonradiative deactivation of the ground state causing the dye to fluoresce. Using a double reciprocal plot, the binding constant, Kb, of 6b was determined to be 1.0 × 104 M−1 which is on par with similar monomethine cyanine dyes [8].

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Emission spectra of dye 6b (10 μM) in Tris-HCl buffer with and without ct-DNA (excitation wavelength 520 nm).

Although dye 6b is structurally similar to TO (Figure 1), a known intercalating agent, it is intriguing to investigate interactions at the molecular level. Therefore, computational studies were conducted to get better insight on the mode of binding for these red shifted monomethines. The 264D (a dodecamer d(CGCAAATTTGCG)2) was chosen from the Protein Data Bank as a representative model for dsDNA binding. Molecular docking was then performed on 6b using Autodock (Figure 7). As it turns out, docking was achieved in both the minor and major grooves. Our computational data indicates higher propensity to bind in the minor groove based on relative scoring. Surprisingly, 6b did not display intercalation based on these computational studies. This could be due to the bulkiness of the benz[c,d]indole heterocycle. Further studies such as electrophoresis unwinding assays or crystallography can be conducted in the future to more accurately define the binding modes of these compounds.

3. Experimental

3.1. General Information

All chemicals and solvents were of American Chemical Society grade or HPLC purity and were used as received. HPLC grade methanol and glycerol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) or Acros Organics (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The reactions were followed using silica gel 60 F254 thin layer chromatography plates (Merck EMD Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were obtained using high quality Kontes NMR tubes (Kimble Chase, Vineland, NJ, USA) rated to 500 MHz and were recorded on an Avance spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA; 400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C) in DMSO-d6 or CD3Cl-d3. High-resolution accurate mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained at the Georgia State University Mass Spectrometry Facility using a Q-TOF micro (ESI-Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). HPLC data was obtained using a Waters 2487 dual detector wavelength absorption detector with wavelengths set at 260 and 600 nm. The column used in LC was a Waters Delta-Pak 5 μM 100 Å 3.9 × 150 mm reversed phase C18 column, with a flow rate of 1mL/min employing a 5%–100% acetonitrile/water/0.1% formic acid gradient. All compounds tested were >95% pure. Infrared spectra (FT-IR) were obtained using a Spectrum 100 spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Duluth, GA, USA) (see Supplementary Materials). UV-Vis/NIR absorption spectra were recorded on a Cary 50 spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) interfaced with Cary WinUV Scan Application v3.00 using VWR disposable polystyrene cuvettes with a 1 cm pathlength. Laser Induced Fluorescence (LIF) emission spectra were acquired using Shimadzu RF-5301 Spectroflurophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation Analytical Instruments Division, Duisburg, Germany) interfaced to a PC with RF-5301PC software using Sigma-Aldrich disposable polystyrene fluorimeter cuvettes with a 1 cm pathlength. All spectral measurements were recorded at room temperature. The data analysis and calculations were carried out using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

3.2. Synthesis

3.2.1. General Synthetic Procedure for the Indolium Salts 4 and 9a–c

Thioether 4 was previously synthesized by our group and others [20,60]. The substituted indoles 8 were synthesized as previously reported by our group and others [20,61]. Each individual compound 8 was dissolved in acetonitrile and alkyl halide was added. The reaction mixture was then refluxed for 12 h. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was used to monitor the reaction progress using a mixture of 4:1 dichloromethane-hexanes. Upon cooling to room temperature, the quaternary ammonium salts 9a–c were precipitated in diethyl ether and collected by vacuum filtration [36,62].

3.2.2. General Synthesis of the Monomethine Dyes

Thioether 4 and each quaternary ammonium salt 5a–d and 9a–c, respectively, were dissolved in acetonitrile and a catalytic amount of triethlyamine was added to the solution. The reaction mixture was refluxed at 60 °C for 1 h and monitored by UV-Vis. Upon cooling to room temperature, the corresponding dyes 6a–d and 10a–c were precipitated by adding diethyl ether. The solid was collected by vacuum filtration and triethylammonium salts were removed by washing with deionized water. The final dyes were purified via precipitation from methanol with diethyl ether.

1-Butyl-2-[(3-methyl-1,3-benzoxazol-2(3H)-ylidene)methyl]benzo[c,d]indolium iodide (6a); Yield 0.43 g, 69%; mp > 260 °C; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 0.95 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.44–1.49 (m, 2H), 1.82–1.85 (m, 2H), 4.04 (s, 3H), 4.48 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 6.14 (s, 1H), 7.55–7.67 (m, 3H), 7.73 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.82–7.89 (m, 2H), 8.04 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 8.39 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 9.17 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 14.3, 20.1, 30.2, 32.0, 75.5, 110.1, 112.3, 112.6, 126.6, 127.2, 129.7, 129.7, 130.3, 130.4, 131.8, 132.9, 141.1, 146.8, 155.6, 162.0; HRMS (ESI): Calcd for C24H23N2O+ m/z 355.1805, obsd m/z 355.1791.

1-Butyl-2-[(3-methyl-1,3-benzothiazol-2(3H)-ylidene)methyl]benzo[c,d]indolium iodide (6b); Yield 0.37 g, 57%; mp 249–251 °C; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 0.96 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.43–1.49 (m, 2H), 1.75–1.92 (m, 2H), 4.16 (s, 3H), 4.37 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.47 (s, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.3Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.81 (m, 2H), 7.89 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.20 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 9.25 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 13.8, 19.7, 29.7, 35.4, 43.4, 87.0, 109.0, 115.0, 122.0, 123.6, 124.7, 126.8, 128.8, 129.2, 129.6, 129.7, 132.3, 141.0, 141.2, 154.0, 165.9; HRMS (ESI): Calcd for C24H23N2S+ m/z 371.1576, obsd m/z 371.1566.

1-Butyl-2-[(1-methylquinolin-2(1H)-ylidene)methyl]benzo[c,d]indolium iodide (6c); Yield 0.44 g, 69%; mp 225–227 °C; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 0.95 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.40–1.54 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.85 (m, 2H), 4.25 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 4.37 (s, 3H), 6.35 (s, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.55–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.35 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 8.58–8.71 (m, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 13.9, 19.7, 29.7, 42.9, 93.6, 106.4, 118.4, 120.0, 123.7, 127.5, 128.9, 129.5, 129.7, 130.4, 133.9, 141.2, 152.1, 157.0; HRMS (ESI): Calcd for C26H25N2+ m/z 365.2012, obsd m/z 365.1999.

1-Butyl-2-[(1,1,3-trimethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzo[e]indol-2-ylidene)methyl]benzo[c,d]indolium iodide (6d); Yield 0.52 g, 72%; mp 190–192 °C; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 0.95 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.45 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.80–1.97 (m, 8H), 3.60 (s, 3H) 4.46 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 6.43 (s, 1H), 7.60 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.67–7.78 (m, 3H), 7.81 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.84–7.93 (m, 3H), 8.14 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 8.35 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 13.7, 19.7, 25.2, 29.8, 43.8, 53.2, 54.9, 82.9, 110.4, 113.1, 122.9, 123.0, 124.1, 125.8, 127.7, 128.0, 128.6, 129.3, 129.6, 129.8, 130.0, 130.2, 130.3, 132.1, 132.3, 133.6, 140.8, 141.3, 156.5, 181.1; HRMS (ESI): Calcd for C31H31N2+ m/z 431.2482, obsd m/z 431.2469.

1-Butyl-2-[(1,1,3-trimethyl-1,3-dihydro-1H-indol-2-ylidene)methyl]benzo[c,d]indolium iodide (10a); Yield 0.42 g, 63%; mp 238–240 °C; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 0.95 (t, J = 7.08 Hz, 3H), 1.42–1.47 (m, 2H), 1.65 (s, 6H), 1.85–1.88 (m, 2H), 3.47 (s, 3H), 4.46 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 6.31 (s, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.51–7.63 (m, 2H), 7.69–7.85 (m, 4H), 7.88–7.96 (m, 2H), 8.38 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 13.6, 19.6, 25.6, 29.7, 43.8, 45.7, 51.4, 82.9, 110.9, 113.3, 122.7, 123.2, 123.9, 126.4, 128.6, 129.1, 129.1, 129.5, 130.0, 130.2, 132.5, 140.1, 140.6, 143.9, 156.9, 179.5; HRMS (ESI): Calcd for C27H29N2+ m/z 381.2325, obsd m/z 381.2313.

1-Butyl-2-[(3-ethyl-5-methoxy-1,1-dimethyl-1,3-dihydro-1H-indol-2-ylidene)methyl]benzo[c,d] indolium iodide (10b); Yield 0.65 g, 90%; mp 187–189 °C; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 0.92 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.14 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.37–1.43 (m, 2H), 1.61 (s, 6H), 1.79–1.83 (m, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 4.20 (q, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 4.39 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 6.23 (s, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (s, 1H), 7.58–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.70 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.77–7.87 (m, 2H), 7.87–7.94 (m, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 13.3, 13.7, 19.5, 25.1, 29.7, 43.4, 45.6, 51.9, 56.0, 83.4, 109.5, 109.9, 113.8, 115.3, 122.4, 124.1, 127.3, 129.4, 129.5, 129.9, 130.1, 132.1, 134.8, 140.9, 142.8, 154.9, 158.9, 179.4; HRMS (ESI): Calcd for C29H33N2O+ m/z 425.2587, obsd m/z 425.2576.

1-Butyl-2-[(5-chloro-3-ethyl-1,1-dimethyl-1,3-dihydro-1H-indol-2-ylidene)methyl]benzo[c,d] indolium iodide (10c); Yield 0.25 g, 34%; mp 152–154 °C; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 0.91 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.08 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.37–1.43 (m, 2H), 1.63 (s, 6H), 1.81–1.84 (m, 2H), 4.16 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 4.47 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2 H), 6.29 (s, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.81 (m, 2H), 7.85–7.95 (m, 3H), 8.10 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.39 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ ppm 13.0, 13.7, 19.4, 25.4, 29.9, 43.8, 45.7, 51.5, 83.8, 111.8, 115.5, 123.5, 123.7, 123.9, 128.4, 128.9, 129.2, 129.6, 130.1, 130.6, 133.2, 140.5, 140.8, 142.7, 156.8, 179.1; HRMS (ESI): Calcd for C28H30N2Cl+ m/z 429.2092, obsd m/z 429.2083.

3.3. Stock Solutions for Optical Measurements

Stock solutions were prepared by weighing the solid of each individual compound on a 5-digit analytical balance and adding solvent via class A volumetric pipette to make a 1.0 mM solution. The vials were vortexed for 20 s and then sonicated for 5 min to ensure complete dissolution. When not in use, the stock solutions were stored in a dark at 4 °C. For emission spectra in methanol/glycerol solutions the concentrations were prepared via the dilution of the stock solution in methanol followed by the addition of the appropriate volume of glycerol to achieve the desired concentrations.

3.4. Method of Determining Absorbance and Fluorescence

Stock solutions were used to prepare five dilutions of dyes with concentrations ranging from 5 to 25 μM using a class A volumetric pipette in order to maintain absorption between 0.1 and 1.0. The dye solutions were diluted ten-fold for fluorescence in order to minimize inner filter effect. The absorption spectra of each sample were measured in duplicate from 400 to 750 nm. Aggregation of 6b was ruled out by measuring absorption at different concentrations (Figure S2G). Dye 6b was tested for solvatochromic changes in absorption by dissolving the dye in five different solvents (ethanol, dimethyl formamide, dichloromethane, acetonitrile, and aqueous tris buffer) to observe any change in λmax (Supplementary Materials Figure S2H). The emission spectra of each sample were measured in duplicate with a 530 nm excitation wavelength and slit widths of 5 nm for both excitation and emission. Emission spectra were corrected automatically by our developed method file used for reading the spectrofluorometer.

3.5. Computational Methods

The structure of each compound was first optimized using the TD-DFT method with the hybrid exchange-correlation functional, B3LYP/6-31G* basis set using SPARTAN ‘14 (Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) [63]. The torsional angles from the quaternary nitrogen to the α-carbon on the alternate heterocycle were restricted to 0° to get the calculated absorbance values, LUMO and HOMO orbitals, and electrostatic potential maps. The calculated LUMO and HOMO orbitals were obtained using a restricted hybrid HF-DFT SCF calculation performed with B3LYP/6-31G* basis set. The electrostatic potential maps were investigated for the optimized structures at HF/6-31G*. DNA docking studies were achieved using AutoDockTools 1.5.6 (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA). Results of DNA docking study with dye 6b under constraints were obtained by making all bonds within the dye to be non-rotatable and planar [64,65]. Polar and aromatic hydrogens were added to the DNA using GROMACS package [66] using GROMOS 53A6 force field [67] and Gasteiger Marsili charges [68]. A 78 × 70 × 64 grid box with a resolution of 0.375 Å was created encompassing the entire DNA using module AutoGrid 4.0. Dye 6b was then added and simulations were preformed using Genetic Algorithm (GA).

3.6. DNA Binding Studies

A stock solution of 6b (1 × 10−4 M) and ct-DNA type 1 (7.5 × 10−3 M) were prepared in ethanol and Tris-HCl buffer solution, respectively. Fluorescence titration with ct-DNA concentrations (0–200 mM) were made by mixing 35 μL 6b solution with Tris-HCl buffer solution with and without ct-DNA to a total volume of 3500 μL in a fluorescence cuvette to make working solutions of 10 μM 6b. Fluorescence spectra were measured in duplicate with excitation at 520 nm and slit widths of 10 nm for both excitation and emission.

4. Conclusions

A series of seven monomethine cyanines were synthesized in good yield with red-shifted absorbance properties in comparison to previously synthesized monomethine cyanine dyes. Although the benz[c,d]indolium containing monomethine cyanine dyes in this report are non-fluorescent in free flowing solvent, when the dyes are in a viscous environment their fluorescence becomes observable due to the restricted ability to rotate around the methine bridge. Computational methods outlined above were shown to be useful as a predictive tool for determining their optical properties. Dye 6b was chosen as a representative example for DNA binding studies and was shown to bind DNA with an observable increase in fluorescence. Computational studies suggest it is binding the minor groove. Utilizing the described techniques these dyes could be developed as potential biological probes. Future studies will investigate how the different heterocycles and substituents affect binding to biological targets.

Acknowledgments

M.H. appreciates the Georgia State University Chemistry Department and Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics for their Support. This study was supported by the Georgia State University Neuroscience Institute Brains and Behavior Seed Grant and Health Innovation Program Seed Grant. The authors thank Eric Owens and Vincent Martinez for editing.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (1.7MB, pdf)

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/21/1/23/s1.

Author Contributions

M.H. designed the research and all authors wrote the paper. E.S., C.H., and A.L. performed experiments. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  • 1.Mishra A., Behera R.K., Behera P.K., Mishra B.K., Behera G.B. Cyanines during the 1990s: A Review. Chem. Rev. 2000;100:1973–2012. doi: 10.1021/cr990402t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pisoni D.S., Todeschini L., Borges A.C.A., Petzhold C.L., Rodembusch F.S., Campo L.F. Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Cyanine Dyes. Synthesis, Spectral Properties, and BSA Association Study. J. Org. Chem. 2014;79:5511–5520. doi: 10.1021/jo500657s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wada H., Hyun H., Vargas C., Gravier J., Park G., Gioux S., Frangioni J.V., Henary M., Choi H.S. Pancreas-Targeted NIR Fluorophores for Dual-Channel Image-Guided Abdominal Surgery. Theranostics. 2015;5:1–11. doi: 10.7150/thno.10259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hyun H., Wada H., Bao K., Gravier J., Yadav Y., Laramie M., Henary M., Frangioni J.V., Choi H.S. Phosphonated Near-Infrared Fluorophores for Biomedical Imaging of Bone. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014;53:10668–10672. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hyun H., Owens E.A., Wada H., Levitz A., Park G., Park M.H., Frangioni J.V., Henary M., Choi H.S. Cartilage-Specific Near-Infrared Fluorophores for Biomedical Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015;54:8648–8652. doi: 10.1002/anie.201502287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Njiojob C.N., Owens E.A., Narayana L., Hyun H., Choi H.S., Henary M. Tailored Near-Infrared Contrast Agents for Image Guided Surgery. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:2845–2854. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hyun H., Park M.H., Owens E.A., Wada H., Henary M., Handgraaf H.J.M., Vahrmeijer A.L., Frangioni J.V., Choi H.S. Structure-inherent targeting of near-infrared fluorophores for parathyroid and thyroid gland imaging. Nat. Med. 2015;21:192–197. doi: 10.1038/nm.3728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.El-Shishtawy R.M., Asiri A.M., Basaif S.A., Rashad Sobahi T. Synthesis of a new beta-naphthothiazole monomethine cyanine dye for the detection of DNA in aqueous solution. Spectrochim. Acta A. 2010;75:1605–1609. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2010.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Henary M., Levitz A. Synthesis and applications of unsymmetrical carbocyanine dyes. Dyes Pigment. 2013;99:1107–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Silva G.L., Ediz V., Yaron D., Armitage B.A. Experimental and Computational Investigation of Unsymmetrical Cyanine Dyes: Understanding Torsionally Responsive Fluorogenic Dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:5710–5718. doi: 10.1021/ja070025z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cao J., Wu T., Hu C., Liu T., Sun W., Fan J., Peng X. The nature of the different environmental sensitivity of symmetrical and unsymmetrical cyanine dyes: An experimental and theoretical study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012;14:13702–13708. doi: 10.1039/c2cp42122d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Deligeorgiev T.G., Gadjev N.I., Drexhage K.-H., Sabnis R.W. Preparation of intercalating dye thiazole orange and derivatives. Dyes Pigments. 1995;29:315–322. doi: 10.1016/0143-7208(95)00056-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thompson M. Synthesis, Photophysical Effects, and DNA Targeting Properties of Oxazole Yellow-Peptide Bioconjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006;17:507–513. doi: 10.1021/bc050307t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dähne S., Resch-Genger U., Wolfbeis O.S. In: Near-Infrared Dyes for High Technology Applications. Daehne S., Resch-Genger U., Wolfbeis O.S., editors. Kluwer; Dordrecht, The Netherland; Boston, MA, USA: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nygren J., Svanvik N., Kubista M. The interactions between the fluorescent dye thiazole orange and DNA. Biopolymers. 1998;46:39–51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199807)46:1<39::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Joseph M.J., Taylor J.C., McGown L.B., Pitner B., Linn C.P. Spectroscopic studies of YO and YOYO fluorescent dyes in a thrombin-binding DNA ligand. Biospectroscopy. 1996;2:173–183. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6343(1996)2:3<173::AID-BSPY4>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kabatc J. Multicationic monomethine dyes as sensitizers in two- and three-component photoinitiating systems for multiacrylate monomers. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 2010;214:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hirons G.T., Fawcett J.J., Crissman H.A. Toto and Yoyo—New Very Bright Fluorochromes for DNA Content Analyses by Flow-Cytometry. Cytometry. 1994;15:129–140. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990150206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dietzek B., Brüggemann B., Persson P., Yartsev A. On the excited-state multi-dimensionality in cyanines. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008;455:13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.02.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Soriano E., Outler L., Owens E.A., Henary M. Synthesis of Asymmetric Monomethine Cyanine Dyes with Red-Shifted Optical Properties. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2015;52:180–184. doi: 10.1002/jhet.1963. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Upadhyayula S., Nunez V., Espinoza E.M., Larsen J.M., Bao D.D., Shi D.W., Mac J.T., Anvari B., Vullev V.I. Photoinduced dynamics of a cyanine dye: Parallel pathways of non-radiative deactivation involving multiple excited-state twisted transients. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:2237–2251. doi: 10.1039/C4SC02881C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sameiro M., Goncalves T. Fluorescent Labeling of Biomolecules with Organic Probes. Chem. Rev. 2009;109:190–212. doi: 10.1021/cr0783840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lavis L.D., Raines R.T. Bright ideas for chemical biology. ACS Chem. Biol. 2008;3:142–155. doi: 10.1021/cb700248m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mann S. Life as a nanoscale phenomenon. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008;47:5306–5320. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Resch-Genger U., Grabolle M., Cavaliere-Jaricot S., Nitschke R., Nann T. Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:763–775. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen A.K., Cheng Z., Behlke M.A., Tsourkas A. Assessing the sensitivity of commercially available fluorophores to the intracellular environment. Anal. Chem. 2008;80:7437–7444. doi: 10.1021/ac8011347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Simeonov A., Jadhav A., Thomas C.J., Wang Y., Huang R., Southall N.T., Shinn P., Smith J., Austin C.P., Auld D.S., Inglese J. Fluorescence spectroscopic profiling of compound libraries. J. Med. Chem. 2008;51:2363–2371. doi: 10.1021/jm701301m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Longmire M.R., Ogawa M., Hama Y., Kosaka N., Regino C.A., Choyke P.L., Kobayashi H. Determination of optimal rhodamine fluorophore for in vivo optical imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19:1735–1742. doi: 10.1021/bc800140c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Johnsson N., Johnsson K. Chemical tools for biomolecular imaging. ACS Chem. Biol. 2007;2:31–38. doi: 10.1021/cb6003977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marti A.A., Jockusch S., Stevens N., Ju J., Turro N.J. Fluorescent hybridization probes for sensitive and selective DNA and RNA detection. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007;40:402–409. doi: 10.1021/ar600013q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Willis R.C. Portraits of life, one molecule at a time. Anal. Chem. 2007;79:1785–1788. doi: 10.1021/ac0718795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hama Y., Urano Y., Koyama Y., Bernardo M., Choyke P.L., Kobayashi H. A comparison of the emission efficiency of four common green fluorescence dyes after internalization into cancer cells. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006;17:1426–1431. doi: 10.1021/bc0601626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yuste R. Fluorescence microscopy today. Nat. Methods. 2005;2:902–904. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1205-902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lichtman J.W., Fraser S.E. The neuronal naturalist: Watching neurons in their native habitat. Nat. Neurosci. 2001;4:1215–1220. doi: 10.1038/nn754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Selvin P.R. The renaissance of fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000;7:730–734. doi: 10.1038/78948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hu H., Owens E.A., Su H., Yan L., Levitz A., Zhao X., Henary M., Zheng Y.G. Exploration of Cyanine Compounds as Selective Inhibitors of Protein Arginine Methyltransferases: Synthesis and Biological Evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:1228–1243. doi: 10.1021/jm501452j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nanjunda R., Owens E., Mickelson L., Dost T., Stroeva E., Huynh H., Germann M., Henary M., Wilson W. Selective G-Quadruplex DNA Recognition by a New Class of Designed Cyanines. Molecules. 2013;18:13588–13607. doi: 10.3390/molecules181113588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mapp C.T., Owens E.A., Henary M., Grant K.B. Oxidative cleavage of DNA by pentamethine carbocyanine dyes irradiated with long-wavelength visible light. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2014;24:214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lakowicz J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. 3rd ed. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kantor G.J., Hull D.R. An effect of ultraviolet light on RNA and protein synthesis in nondividing human diploid fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 1979;27:359–370. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85223-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cerutti P.A. Prooxidant states and tumor promotion. Science. 1985;227:375–381. doi: 10.1126/science.2981433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Marks R. An overview of skin cancers. Incidence and causation. Cancer. 1995;75:607–612. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950115)75:2+<607::AID-CNCR2820751402>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Krasnaya Z.A., Tret’yakova E.O., Kachala V.V., Zlotin S.G. Synthesis of conjugated polynitriles by the reactions of β-dimethylaminoacrolein aminal and 1-dimethylamino-1,3,3-trimethoxypropane with 2-dicyanomethylene-4,5,5-trimethyl-3-cyano-2,5-dihydrofuran. Mendeleev Commun. 2007;17:349–351. doi: 10.1016/j.mencom.2007.11.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brooker L.G.S., Keyes G.H., Williams W.W. Color and Constitution. V.1 The Absorption of Unsymmetrical Cyanines. Resonance as a Basis for a Classification of Dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942;64:199–210. doi: 10.1021/ja01254a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Williams C.G. XXVI.—Researches on Chinoline and its Homologues. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1857;21:377–401. doi: 10.1017/S0080456800032208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yarmoluk S.M., Kovalska V.B., Losytskyy M.Y. Symmetric cyanine dyes for detecting nucleic acids. Biotech. Histochem. 2008;83:131–145. doi: 10.1080/10520290802383684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Levitz A., Ladani S.T., Hamelberg D., Henary M. Synthesis and effect of heterocycle modification on the spectroscopic properties of a series of unsymmetrical trimethine cyanine dyes. Dyes Pigments. 2014;105:238–249. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Murphy S., Yang X.Q., Schuster G.B. Cyanine Borate Salts That Form Penetrated Ion-Pairs in Benzene Solution—Synthesis, Properties, and Structure. J. Org. Chem. 1995;60:2411–2422. doi: 10.1021/jo00113a022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Deligeorgiev T.G., Zaneva D.A., Kim S.H., Sabnis R.W. Preparation of monomethine cyanine dyes for nucleic acid detection. Dyes Pigments. 1998;37:205–211. doi: 10.1016/S0143-7208(97)80088-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Timcheva I.I., Maximova V.A., Deligeorgiev T.G., Gadjev N.I., Sabnis R.W., Ivanov I.G. Fluorescence spectral characteristics of novel asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes in nucleic acid solutions. FEBS Lett. 1997;405:141–144. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00171-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Oster G., Nishijima Y. Fluorescence and Internal Rotation: Their Dependence on Viscosity of the Medium1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956;78:1581–1584. doi: 10.1021/ja01589a021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Potts K.T. In: Heteropentalenes, in Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds: Special Topics in Heterocyclic Chemistry. Weissberger A., Taylor E.C., editors. Volume 30 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Escobedo J.O., Rusin O., Lim S., Strongin R.M. NIR dyes for bioimaging applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010;14:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kuhn H. A Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Light Absorption of Organic Dyes and Similar Compounds. J. Chem. Phys. 1949;17:1198–1212. doi: 10.1063/1.1747143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bickelhaupt F.M., Baerends E.J. Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory: Predicting and Understanding Chemistry. Rev. Comput. Chem. 2000;15:1–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cantor C.R., Schimmel P.R. Biophysical Chemistry. W.H. Freeman; San Francisco, CA, USA: 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shaikh S.A., Ahmed S.R., Jayaram B. A molecular thermodynamic view of DNA-drug interactions: A case study of 25 minor-groove binders. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004;429:81–99. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2004.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chaires J.B., Ren J., Hamelberg D., Kumar A., Pandya V., Boykin D.W., Wilson W.D. Structural selectivity of aromatic diamidines. J. Med. Chem. 2004;47:5729–5742. doi: 10.1021/jm049491e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fairley T.A., Tidwell R.R., Donkor I., Naiman N.A., Ohemeng K.A., Lombardy R.J., Bentley J.A., Cory M. Structure, DNA minor groove binding, and base pair specificity of alkyl- and aryl-linked bis(amidinobenzimidazoles) and bis(amidinoindoles) J. Med. Chem. 1993;36:1746–1753. doi: 10.1021/jm00064a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sinha S.H., Owens E.A., Feng Y., Yang Y., Xie Y., Tu Y., Henary M., Zheng Y.G. Synthesis and evaluation of carbocyanine dyes as PRMT inhibitors and imaging agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012;54:647–659. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nanjunda R., Owens E.A., Mickelson L., Alyabyev S., Kilpatrick N., Wang S., Henary M., Wilson W.D. Halogenated pentamethine cyanine dyes exhibiting high fidelity for G-quadruplex DNA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012;20:7002–7011. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Narayanan N., Patonay G. A New Method for the Synthesis of Heptamethine Cyanine Dyes: Synthesis of New Near-Infrared Fluorescent Labels. J. Org. Chem. 1995;60:2391–2395. doi: 10.1021/jo00113a018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shao Y., Molnar L.F., Jung Y., Kussmann J., Ochsenfeld C., Brown S.T., Gilbert A.T.B., Slipchenko L.V., Levchenko S.V., O’Neill D.P., et al. Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006;8:3172–3191. doi: 10.1039/b517914a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Morris G.M., Huey R., Lindstrom W., Sanner M.F., Belew R.K., Goodsell D.S., Olson A.J. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 2009;30:2785–2791. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ricci C.G., Netz P.A. Docking Studies on DNA-Ligand Interactions: Building and Application of a Protocol To Identify the Binding Mode. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009;49:1925–1935. doi: 10.1021/ci9001537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kulchin Y.N., Vitrik O.B., Kamenev O.T., Romashko R.V. Vector Fields Reconstruction by Fiber Optic Measuring Network. SPIE; Bellingham, WA, USA;: 2001. pp. 100–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Oostenbrink C., Soares T., van der Vegt N.A., van Gunsteren W. Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field. Eur. Biophys. J. 2005;34:273–284. doi: 10.1007/s00249-004-0448-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gasteiger J., Marsili M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity—A rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron. 1980;36:3219–3228. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(80)80168-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (1.7MB, pdf)

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES